on the one hand we have a god who is sophisticated enough to create a universe using extremes of physics, chemistry, biology and quantum mechanics, a universe that is finely tuned to one part in zillions, with humans designed to have the smallest of biological machines to regulate the workings of their bodies, not to mention the uncountable operations our brain carries out every moment, and the intricacies of consciousness, but you want me to believe that his person also thought nailing his son to a tree was a good idea. religists are crazy people.
1. Just because you dont understand why a god would let something like that happen doesn't make it an argument against god. It's just incredulity added to an assertion 2. In the most good faith interpretations of your issue with that specific god you just chipped away at some fluff you personally dont like but even if you were "correct" about it that would not lessen the possibility of a deity existing it just exposes what you think makes a god "cool" or not. Most atheists really just dont like the menu of different approximations of a god simply because they dont like the fluff around the core concept.
How could micro living beings reproduce without complexity? See them as machines by the complexity. Dont think any life is simple. God that created the first animals and etc.
To continue with his card analogy, the anti-science people trying to use science to prove something unscientific are stacking the deck against themselves
@@MarkPatmos No, I never said *anyone* who believes in imaginary beings is anti-science. They just aren’t using science to form that specific belief. How close was I with the “just a theory” reference?
@@moonshoes11Where do the laws of physics come from? They just popped into existence like magic without a magician. Makes believing in God seem more rational.
(/_;)/~~ This is an artistic proof of a created universe. When you paint a shadow it's the opposite color of the object that made the shadow. Nobody knew what the opposite color of white was so the artists avoided painting white on white. The opposite color of white is baby blue and baby pink. The first artist to figure it out was Norman Rockwell. I was the second artist to figure it out. I saw it in the corner of a white room. The lighting was perfect to see it.
If a Martian landed on Earth and watched the podcasts associated with Justin Brierley, it would think that the only thing human beings do is discuss science and religion. Justin manages to ignore about 95% of what human beings really value.
@@MarkPatmos if a martian landed on earth i think you'd find it interesting fairly quickly. that's a daft thing to say. you really aren't a scientist, you;re right about that.
@@MarkPatmos The Martian metaphor is just a way of invoking the idea of someone who holds no cultural or psychological prejudices, of seeing something objectively.
- Raised by atheists - Starts questionning his beliefs (like any intelligent person) - Is influenced by the counterculture of the 1960s - Talks about "dreams" pointing him in the right direction? - Decides to go to church. I'm sorry, what is the scientific evidence for the existence of a creator? There isn't any, It can be boiled down to a single sentence at 02:15, he felt like he had something "missing" and he used science and religion to feel the void.
＼(_ _) The artifacts of a swastika is flobby with stazzle and a jumble that tumbled. That is a skeleton, human heart, signature, internal combustion engine, animation of the big bang and a wave. That unify the universe you can't do with math. A swastika is the simplest rendering possible for those artifacts and needs to be saved.
@@Theo_Skeptomai But it does seem possible that our reality might be designed for this purpose assuming God exists and the Bible gives an insight into the creator
( ￣ー￣)ﾉ We need to popularize the idea of getting God married. Getting God married is a good use of someone's time. You are supposed to make the environment intelligent so no God is needed. We fixed the video and audio for the best experience possible. Cameras are supernatural and all of them captured 3D that not a gimmick. The audio loud don't make violence so has depth. Nobody has to buy anything for it to work.
Should this podcast be renamed Maybe Sub-Christain Podcast as it never deals with topics people engage with in their lives. Only those entranced in a positivist myth engage in the type of discourse that Justin promotes. “People nowadays think that scientists are there to instruct them, poets, musicians, etc., to give them pleasure. The idea that these have something to teach them - that does not occur to them.” Wittgenstein - Culture and Value
So we don't know how life started on earth. It is a mystery. What is the difference between this mystery and people, 2000 years ago, sitting around and pondering the mystery of lighting? To them, Zeus caused lighting and now these Gentlemen are talking about god starting life. What is the difference? It is all god of the gaps.
The difference between this God and Zeus are immense.Humans could not create/imagine a God who is thrice Holy,infinite in majesty,A God who punishes with fire forever for sins.A God whose prophecies are so accurate (Old Testament), hundreds of years before they occur,no,humans create Gods who are like them...have sex,are greedy,fight,die,are definitely not Holy but encourage orgies.
Hallelujah!!! I’m blessed and favored with $60,000 every week! Now I can afford anything and support the work of God and the church. For Your glory, LORD! HALLELUJAH!
Absolutely! I have heard stories of people who started with little or no knowledge but managed to emerge victorious thanks to Ana Graciela Blackwelder.
(⌒0⌒)／~~ The universe was created in 1976. It is too hot to make a universe at the time of the big bang. It can be created at anytime. God is slow and easy. A human can do a lot with their lifespan. I got the hunk. God got the chunk. Everyone else can have the rest. That is song spirit of '76 by The Alarm.
![Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See - CTMU [Full Version; Timestamps]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9miVG2xT5jY/mqdefault.jpg)
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 87 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องชัย vs โชคปรีชา"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YN6e7HVnekw/mqdefault.jpg)
![⭐️( ลอยกระทง 2024 ) Ver. แดนซ์ Remix BY [ ดีเจกิต รีมิกซ์ ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rMWOLhgXUHc/mqdefault.jpg)
on the one hand we have a god who is sophisticated enough to create a universe using extremes
of physics, chemistry, biology and quantum mechanics, a universe that is finely tuned to one
part in zillions, with humans designed to have the smallest of biological machines to regulate
the workings of their bodies, not to mention the uncountable operations our brain carries out
every moment, and the intricacies of consciousness, but you want me to believe that his person
also thought nailing his son to a tree was a good idea.
religists are crazy people.
He didn't nail His Son, you did.
1. Just because you dont understand why a god would let something like that happen doesn't make it an argument against god. It's just incredulity added to an assertion 2. In the most good faith interpretations of your issue with that specific god you just chipped away at some fluff you personally dont like but even if you were "correct" about it that would not lessen the possibility of a deity existing it just exposes what you think makes a god "cool" or not. Most atheists really just dont like the menu of different approximations of a god simply because they dont like the fluff around the core concept.
How could micro living beings reproduce without complexity? See them as machines by the complexity. Dont think any life is simple. God that created the first animals and etc.
@@peterbassey9668 should us believers maybe use ‘we’ instead of ‘you’,
Great conversation. Thank you.
To continue with his card analogy, the anti-science people trying to use science to prove something unscientific are stacking the deck against themselves
I think you’re stacking the deck by referring to ‘anti-science people’
@@MarkPatmos
No, you’re just one of them.
Probably think evolution is “just a theory”.
@@moonshoes11So anyone who believes in God is anti-science? That's just an incorrect generalisation.
@@MarkPatmos
No, I never said *anyone* who believes in imaginary beings is anti-science. They just aren’t using science to form that specific belief.
How close was I with the “just a theory” reference?
@@moonshoes11Where do the laws of physics come from? They just popped into existence like magic without a magician. Makes believing in God seem more rational.
(/_;)/~~ This is an artistic proof of a created universe. When you paint a shadow it's the opposite color of the object that made the shadow. Nobody knew what the opposite color of white was so the artists avoided painting white on white. The opposite color of white is baby blue and baby pink. The first artist to figure it out was Norman Rockwell. I was the second artist to figure it out. I saw it in the corner of a white room. The lighting was perfect to see it.
If a Martian landed on Earth and watched the podcasts associated with Justin Brierley, it would think that the only thing human beings do is discuss science and religion. Justin manages to ignore about 95% of what human beings really value.
He is doing a Christian podcast. What human values are we talking here?
Why does it matter what a Martian might think? (I'm not a scientist but I believe that there is no intelligent life on Mars anyway)
@@MarkPatmos if a martian landed on earth i think you'd find it interesting fairly quickly. that's a daft thing to say. you really aren't a scientist, you;re right about that.
@@MarkPatmos The Martian metaphor is just a way of invoking the idea of someone who holds no cultural or psychological prejudices, of seeing something objectively.
@@opinion3742I think the Martian should watch more than one podcast channel
- Raised by atheists
- Starts questionning his beliefs (like any intelligent person)
- Is influenced by the counterculture of the 1960s
- Talks about "dreams" pointing him in the right direction?
- Decides to go to church.
I'm sorry, what is the scientific evidence for the existence of a creator? There isn't any, It can be boiled down to a single sentence at 02:15, he felt like he had something "missing" and he used science and religion to feel the void.
Thank you!
Had a dream. Must have been jesus. Therefore christainity . Move along. Ate some peyote, saw some things, Therefore coyote. Move along. etc etc
＼(_ _) The artifacts of a swastika is flobby with stazzle and a jumble that tumbled. That is a skeleton, human heart, signature, internal combustion engine, animation of the big bang and a wave. That unify the universe you can't do with math. A swastika is the simplest rendering possible for those artifacts and needs to be saved.
In order to find God and believe in Him freely God must first make it possible to not believe in Him.
?!?
@@Theo_SkeptomaiGod could have designed our reality to make a full range of choices available, including atheism
@@MarkPatmos HOW did you determine this 'God' is a reality?
@@Theo_Skeptomai But it does seem possible that our reality might be designed for this purpose assuming God exists and the Bible gives an insight into the creator
Nothing about this statement makes any sense
science? common sense says.... Fiction
Ah, but what kind of fiction?
@@opinion3742 historical fiction. pretty obvious. and not even original historical fiction, plagiarised historical fiction.
@@opinion3742 schizophrenic fiction
@@opinion3742
Literary fiction.
@@moonshoes11 Clearly
( ￣ー￣)ﾉ We need to popularize the idea of getting God married. Getting God married is a good use of someone's time. You are supposed to make the environment intelligent so no God is needed. We fixed the video and audio for the best experience possible. Cameras are supernatural and all of them captured 3D that not a gimmick. The audio loud don't make violence so has depth. Nobody has to buy anything for it to work.
Should this podcast be renamed Maybe Sub-Christain Podcast as it never deals with topics people engage with in their lives. Only those entranced in a positivist myth engage in the type of discourse that Justin promotes.
“People nowadays think that scientists are there to instruct them, poets, musicians, etc., to give them pleasure. The idea that these have something to teach them - that does not occur to them.” Wittgenstein - Culture and Value
So we don't know how life started on earth. It is a mystery. What is the difference between this mystery and people, 2000 years ago, sitting around and pondering the mystery of lighting? To them, Zeus caused lighting and now these Gentlemen are talking about god starting life. What is the difference? It is all god of the gaps.
The difference between this God and Zeus are immense.Humans could not create/imagine a God who is thrice Holy,infinite in majesty,A God who punishes with fire forever for sins.A God whose prophecies are so accurate (Old Testament), hundreds of years before they occur,no,humans create Gods who are like them...have sex,are greedy,fight,die,are definitely not Holy but encourage orgies.
Hallelujah!!! I’m blessed and favored with $60,000 every week! Now I can afford anything and support the work of God and the church. For Your glory, LORD! HALLELUJAH!
Oh really? Tell me more! Always interested in hearing stories of successes.
This is what Ana Graciela Blackwelder does, she has changed my life.
After raising up to 60k trading with her, I bought a new house and car here in the US and also paid for my son’s (Oscar) surgery. Glory to God.shalom.
I know Ana Graciela Blackwelder, and I have also had success...
Absolutely! I have heard stories of people who started with little or no knowledge but managed to emerge victorious thanks to Ana Graciela Blackwelder.
(⌒0⌒)／~~ The universe was created in 1976. It is too hot to make a universe at the time of the big bang. It can be created at anytime. God is slow and easy. A human can do a lot with their lifespan. I got the hunk. God got the chunk. Everyone else can have the rest. That is song spirit of '76 by The Alarm.
A bloody lie. There is no evidence of a creator.
crackers in the pantry fallacy and category error on your part
Evidence is certainly subjective
The God hypothesis
It's all just magic!