To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/adumb/. The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant’s annual premium subscription.
2:04 The first suggestion from GPT reads like it's telling people "Don't go towards death. Become Death for others." Is it suggesting people should kill others? LMAOO
Don't think I really understood just how accessible this has all come when you can automate entire channels with AI already. Really interesting video and great motivation for me to continue studying Python :D
Awesome video, as a dev myself I was wondering if it's possible to create something like this. Hope you will make it on this chanel with more interesting projects!
Very, very insightful analysis of a “real life” experiment, comparing the performance of an LLM versus a human. My take is that currently LLMs excel on quantity with “good enough quality “, but LLMs do not seem capable of “excellent” or “brilliant” performance. That conclusion looks intuitive to me: when I look at the output of any of the LLMs I’ve tested so far, I do get something that looks as the “average opinion/knowledge” of what I see on the internet using a search engine. Thinking about how LLMs operate, this is what I expect: the tokens with the highest probability are those that are found most often on the internet (this is also the cause for bias). Thus, documents published by exceptional people (let’s say, some genius) will receive a very low probability of being generated by the LLM. Anyway, I really enjoyed a lot this video, and I surely be looking for your future videos.
LLM's (unintentionally) are an exceptional way of representing the collective unconscious of WEIRD countries (Westernized, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) and GPT 4 manifests this intangible "average" pretty eloquently. The problem with this lies in the famous quote by Schopenhauer: "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." Which is to say that yes, until the gears of society shift to accept the currently exceptional as codified and self-evident, the exceptional will remain fringe and speculative - outside the radar of LLM's. Although the same (speculative and fringe) attributes can be assigned to the unfalsifiable ramblings of a conspiracy theorist. The benefit of humans is that we can physically test hypothesis in the real world and receive actual feedback and experience, and this is what differentiates genius from actual insanity: truth - both in terms of accuracy, precision, and frequency. The point here is that to excel in excellence or brilliance, an AI (or AGI, to be more precise) would need to: 1. Be able to interact with the outside world and receive appliable feedback and experience from those interactions. 2. Be able to transfer that feedback to different (or unique, if taken one step further) scenarios, in essence mimicking the executive function and higher-level cognition of humans. (GPT 4 can already do the former, to an extent.) 3. Push boundaries and consequently face doubt, mockery, ridicule, or even violent opposition from the conclusions it generates. Speaking of speculation, since we're on the subject of hypothetical future AGI, I feel it helps to have a rough idea of the difference between consensus truth, empirical truth, and axiomatic truth. In my opinion fields like psychology, political science, ethics, economics, etc are too "fuzzy" for AI to have an opinion on, or to try to influence - at least until we have a complete mapping of the human brain and can understand more empirically how the brain works in its entirety. Until then its genius should remain confined to pushing the envelope on empirical and axiomatic truth.
LLMs are capable of producing far more compelling content if you prompt smarter and keep it more focused on something specific rather than just asking for generic lists, assigning the AI a personality/role with your opening prompt or custom instructions goes a long way on its own.
I can't find it, but I remember that TH-cam had something in the terms of service against automated content (or perhaps against monetizing it). It's possible I misremember, but even if I do I think TH-cam would be likely to add something like that to its TOS if purely automated content had the potential to go viral.
It would probably be good for everyone... except youtube. What's the difference from youtubes pov? They have content that generates views. Why would they care if it is human or AI generated?
@@asdads3948 Probably reducing bloat on the servers? The problem isn't that they get a couple of viral bot channels that make them money, the problem are the millions upon millions of bot channels that do nothing but take up space on their servers. Because lets be real here, if you can fully automate a channel people won't just have one channel. There will be bot farms with 100+ channels constantly uploading junk content daily that all belong to the same group of people, multiply that by many groups doing the same thing and the situation can quickly become unsustainable. Banning fully automated channels from receiving money won't stop all channels, as there probably would be loopholes but it will stop a lot of people from even attempting it.
@@asdads3948 I dont see any problem in it even for the viewers like dude as long as you're getting all get the information or entertainment in it or whatever you seek , viewer should be cool with that they are here for entertainment not investigating the creator.
This was so refreshing, thank you for sharing. I like using AI as a co-pilot instead of complete automation, it makes the work quicker and helps remove blockers, sort of like a muse... but that actually does the work and then you refine it.
If you had 100% automation it would be worth to have like 10 channels running without any interaction, even with a slow growth after years it would be great. The only work you be management to track problems and eventually have anew idea when one starts failing.
You could run the experiment a second time with completely new channels but incorporating everything learned from the first run. After introducing the new style of quote of the day videos on the ai channel, it gained a significant boost in subscribers. Restarting the experiment, you could try to investigate how helpful this boost was in the long term.
What if you create 10+ accounts to play the lottery youtube game in the attempt one go viral? (each account would have a different video, but the same style)
And now we are gonna have a flood of useless automated channels, this noise should settle down eventually but I hope it will be before TH-cam will become flooded with bs like other platforms. The reels format is already destroying our attention span as it is...
TH-cam has already reported that it wants to filter by AI content + there is no need to underestimate people, they will forget without revelations that something is wrong here)
That can only be the case with these disgusting shorts invention, long form content even if its being made with the help of Ai, there's no harm its still gonna provide you correct information or entertainment as obviously majority people do research and script at least by themselves or else its not gonna last longer.
And to be honest some Ai voices are so calm and deep that even without emphasising words we just want to listen it more and get relaxed, making us forget who made it.
Really facinating. Also, i've got an idea. Maybe if you were to make some human made content for some time, you can reach the monetization threshold and continue automation from there.
@@mummyjohn what’s inspiring about people subscribing to dumb shit Not everything needs a positive spin and that’s coming from someone who despises cynicism
The conclusions about quality by each method are unsurprising, though I'm inclined to think that the relative effort required far more than makes up for the difference, no? Your graphs at 11:38 seem to bear this out. If the goal was strictly to monetize from youtube directly, indeed this isn't a useful structure, but then monetizing from youtube directly is a pretty foolish goal IMO. I'd think building a regular audience that can then be leveraged elsewhere (merchandising? creating a consumer/email list for something else?) is a better way to go. Curious your (or anyone's) thoughts.
the one thing missing is that the human channel has the ability to upload better quality content than daily facts and quotes. I know it is supposed to be an equal comparison but the entire point of not using ai is so you can produce better content than just quotes and facts
In shorts is easier as literally people doesn't care if its Ai or human, our fast span mind doesn't calculate that much and just want to watch anything new every 30 seconds, this is why they succeed
Btw a tip for this videos thumbnail: include some text like ‘can AI beat a human?’ in it, really anything related to the videos topic that is decently clickbait-y. I think this will increase the amount of views you’ll get by quite a lot.
Wow, this is such an interesting experiment! I love how you've created two distinct channels to compare the success they would achieve. It's fascinating to see the combination of handmade videos and AI-generated content in action. Both approaches have their own unique qualities and advantages. The handmade videos bring a personal touch and creativity that can truly resonate with viewers. The effort, time, and craftsmanship involved in creating them can be appreciated, and it adds an element of authenticity to the content. On the other hand, the AI-generated channel offers a different perspective, leveraging the power of technology to generate intriguing quotes and facts. It's amazing to witness how AI can contribute to content creation. I'm excited to see the results of this experiment and discover which channel garners more success. It's a great opportunity to explore the preferences of the audience and understand the impact of different content creation methods. Kudos to you for pushing the boundaries and exploring new avenues in content creation. Keep up the fantastic work, and I'll be eagerly following both channels to see how they progress! (Written by ChatGPT)
I did the same thing, but I quickly realized it would cost quite a bit of money and probably never generate it back. How much money did this experiment cost?
Bro you earned my respect by your honesty, even i started my channel listening to this fake youtubers, and now i am stuck because no one gives me feedback whether my videos is good or bad😭
To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/adumb/. The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant’s annual premium subscription.
There's a certain irony that YouTude named you @Human-279
Sup!
You sound like making videos is easy, actually?
Importantly, this kind of long-form high quality thoughtful analysis can't even be produced by most people much less an AI.
ive seen ai shorts with 1000x the views of this video though
@@fergalhennessy775 tis luck in the algorithm
@@fergalhennessy775They are talking about quality, not success
@@silviocupica2521 nobody goes to yt shorts for quality lil bro
@@fergalhennessy775 You agree with him and then call him lil bro? ok kid
Plot twist, it turns out that adumb himself is an extremely sophisticated ai.
Yes
_audible gasp_
Yes
Yes
Yes
dude getting a sponsor in just your fifth ever video is such a huge flex
Brilliant basically sponsors any educational channel lol
@@Trifect69420 to be honest you are accurate. I have seen Brillant sponsorships from other educational channel. Not as much flex.
That goes crazy 😂
Listen to how this guy works, he doesn’t need sponsors dude is guaranteed a millionaire from his day job.
dsa
Actually nuts that you managed to get nearly 500 subscribers in a month on an AI channel
@@youbetyourwrasse if you like the content then what's the issue?
People love junk food.
thats how much subs i got on my youtube channel that i put weekly effort into between ages 14 and 17. not that im jealous or anything..
@@thedistinguished5255 tbf, short form content is a much easier way to get subs than long form
Nuts 😋
Congrats on getting sponsored already, your projects are awesome
Plot twist: this is the ai channel
_audible gasp_
Lol ikr 😂
You can tell by the voice 😂
lol
Dude, you your creations are really next level man!
I'm sure I've come across a few of your reels before on youtube 😂😂
It's a real fight to get the algorithm to stop suggesting ai generated garbage
On TH-cam they are called shorts 🤓☝️
@@icyboyy6177nice face reveal.
nicely done, showing pros and cons of an automated channel with actual data
2:04 The first suggestion from GPT reads like it's telling people "Don't go towards death. Become Death for others." Is it suggesting people should kill others? LMAOO
Suggestion from gpt?
Don't think I really understood just how accessible this has all come when you can automate entire channels with AI already. Really interesting video and great motivation for me to continue studying Python :D
Uhhh...you get the AI to run python. You don't write it yourself.
@@yougeo You do write yourself the code, the AWS instance he created didnt appear magically
Man flexing he can make a large yt channel from scratch, but chooses to stay with this format for his integrity, hats off
Great video. I really appreciate the approach and thoroughness
This was a very interesting idea and the execution was amazing. Good video!
This is a real gem of a channel. I love seeing this content, and you really inspire me to work on some cool hacks like this too!
This is the beginning of the dead internet theory
might be worth re-doing this experiment now with GPT4 and more sophisticated tools overall
This channel is really cool, man! Looking forward to seeing what you do next!
ai replaced the prayer service reflection at my school. not even religion is safe from the ai apocalypse
5:13 pov gen alpha: yay
this is extremely interesting! keep up the good work
Awesome video, as a dev myself I was wondering if it's possible to create something like this. Hope you will make it on this chanel with more interesting projects!
Clipclamp or whatever it’s called is useful because it can make short videos using stock footage and it already has a voice and it adds music
Very, very insightful analysis of a “real life” experiment, comparing the performance of an LLM versus a human. My take is that currently LLMs excel on quantity with “good enough quality “, but LLMs do not seem capable of “excellent” or “brilliant” performance.
That conclusion looks intuitive to me: when I look at the output of any of the LLMs I’ve tested so far, I do get something that looks as the “average opinion/knowledge” of what I see on the internet using a search engine. Thinking about how LLMs operate, this is what I expect: the tokens with the highest probability are those that are found most often on the internet (this is also the cause for bias). Thus, documents published by exceptional people (let’s say, some genius) will receive a very low probability of being generated by the LLM.
Anyway, I really enjoyed a lot this video, and I surely be looking for your future videos.
LLM's (unintentionally) are an exceptional way of representing the collective unconscious of WEIRD countries (Westernized, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) and GPT 4 manifests this intangible "average" pretty eloquently.
The problem with this lies in the famous quote by Schopenhauer: "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Which is to say that yes, until the gears of society shift to accept the currently exceptional as codified and self-evident, the exceptional will remain fringe and speculative - outside the radar of LLM's.
Although the same (speculative and fringe) attributes can be assigned to the unfalsifiable ramblings of a conspiracy theorist. The benefit of humans is that we can physically test hypothesis in the real world and receive actual feedback and experience, and this is what differentiates genius from actual insanity: truth - both in terms of accuracy, precision, and frequency.
The point here is that to excel in excellence or brilliance, an AI (or AGI, to be more precise) would need to:
1. Be able to interact with the outside world and receive appliable feedback and experience from those interactions.
2. Be able to transfer that feedback to different (or unique, if taken one step further) scenarios, in essence mimicking the executive function and higher-level cognition of humans. (GPT 4 can already do the former, to an extent.)
3. Push boundaries and consequently face doubt, mockery, ridicule, or even violent opposition from the conclusions it generates.
Speaking of speculation, since we're on the subject of hypothetical future AGI, I feel it helps to have a rough idea of the difference between consensus truth, empirical truth, and axiomatic truth. In my opinion fields like psychology, political science, ethics, economics, etc are too "fuzzy" for AI to have an opinion on, or to try to influence - at least until we have a complete mapping of the human brain and can understand more empirically how the brain works in its entirety. Until then its genius should remain confined to pushing the envelope on empirical and axiomatic truth.
LLMs are capable of producing far more compelling content if you prompt smarter and keep it more focused on something specific rather than just asking for generic lists, assigning the AI a personality/role with your opening prompt or custom instructions goes a long way on its own.
"Your friendly neighborhood human" doesn't sound like a sinister robot at all.
A really neat video idea!!! Love your channel! Keep going!
BUT YOU COULD JUST REQUEST the quotable api so it generates a random quote each time.
Based on the diagram in the "complete automation" section, that's exactly what they did
dude this was such interesting and high quality video, well done
I can't find it, but I remember that TH-cam had something in the terms of service against automated content (or perhaps against monetizing it). It's possible I misremember, but even if I do I think TH-cam would be likely to add something like that to its TOS if purely automated content had the potential to go viral.
Prtobably them Simps working there have no way to detect it.
It would probably be good for everyone... except youtube. What's the difference from youtubes pov? They have content that generates views. Why would they care if it is human or AI generated?
@@asdads3948 Probably reducing bloat on the servers? The problem isn't that they get a couple of viral bot channels that make them money, the problem are the millions upon millions of bot channels that do nothing but take up space on their servers. Because lets be real here, if you can fully automate a channel people won't just have one channel. There will be bot farms with 100+ channels constantly uploading junk content daily that all belong to the same group of people, multiply that by many groups doing the same thing and the situation can quickly become unsustainable. Banning fully automated channels from receiving money won't stop all channels, as there probably would be loopholes but it will stop a lot of people from even attempting it.
@@asdads3948 I dont see any problem in it even for the viewers like dude as long as you're getting all get the information or entertainment in it or whatever you seek , viewer should be cool with that they are here for entertainment not investigating the creator.
... I swear to god I've seen the short you showed in this video. (Specifically the quote one..)
''In this tutorial I will teach you how to ruin the internet even more"
This guy rocks! Amazing video
Seems like this vid couldn't hack it in the algo but I really enjoyed it.
This was so refreshing, thank you for sharing. I like using AI as a co-pilot instead of complete automation, it makes the work quicker and helps remove blockers, sort of like a muse... but that actually does the work and then you refine it.
3:10 “ass=subtitles.ass” 😂
I was looking for someone who would notice that
Bro your channel is really interesting, you have high quality informative content, and I know how hard and time consuming it is
Honestly, using a script for editing but doing actual voiceover and research would split the difference on what matters.
Yeah, there’s probably an ideal intersection that maximizes the benefits of both approaches.
Google's "I'm feeling curious" is a really nice fun fact generator
If you had 100% automation it would be worth to have like 10 channels running without any interaction, even with a slow growth after years it would be great.
The only work you be management to track problems and eventually have anew idea when one starts failing.
You could run the experiment a second time with completely new channels but incorporating everything learned from the first run. After introducing the new style of quote of the day videos on the ai channel, it gained a significant boost in subscribers. Restarting the experiment, you could try to investigate how helpful this boost was in the long term.
What if you create 10+ accounts to play the lottery youtube game in the attempt one go viral? (each account would have a different video, but the same style)
And now we are gonna have a flood of useless automated channels, this noise should settle down eventually but I hope it will be before TH-cam will become flooded with bs like other platforms. The reels format is already destroying our attention span as it is...
TH-cam has already reported that it wants to filter by AI content + there is no need to underestimate people, they will forget without revelations that something is wrong here)
That can only be the case with these disgusting shorts invention, long form content even if its being made with the help of Ai, there's no harm its still gonna provide you correct information or entertainment as obviously majority people do research and script at least by themselves or else its not gonna last longer.
And to be honest some Ai voices are so calm and deep that even without emphasising words we just want to listen it more and get relaxed, making us forget who made it.
Really facinating.
Also, i've got an idea. Maybe if you were to make some human made content for some time, you can reach the monetization threshold and continue automation from there.
thumb nails can be made pretty easily with ai or at least spisific ones like 3d animated roblox thumbails
Great video. Horribly depressing.
We are clearly doomed
the opportunity to find something inspiring, and yet you go for depressing.
Only if people decide computer > human
@@gavine2363Obviously it has already been decided
@@mummyjohn what’s inspiring about people subscribing to dumb shit
Not everything needs a positive spin and that’s coming from someone who despises cynicism
The conclusions about quality by each method are unsurprising, though I'm inclined to think that the relative effort required far more than makes up for the difference, no? Your graphs at 11:38 seem to bear this out. If the goal was strictly to monetize from youtube directly, indeed this isn't a useful structure, but then monetizing from youtube directly is a pretty foolish goal IMO. I'd think building a regular audience that can then be leveraged elsewhere (merchandising? creating a consumer/email list for something else?) is a better way to go. Curious your (or anyone's) thoughts.
Came here after watching your Wikipedia video…I think I just lost the rest of the workday to catching up on your channel 😂
same
3:17 that looks exactly like the grade A garbage I see on shorts
Plot twist: this video idea was generated by AI.
2:46 it says “.ass” 😂😂
the one thing missing is that the human channel has the ability to upload better quality content than daily facts and quotes. I know it is supposed to be an equal comparison but the entire point of not using ai is so you can produce better content than just quotes and facts
Tuvok was a great choice for the voice over AI.
Literally got an ad for an ai youtube video generator right in the middle of this
how does this only have 8k views 😭😭😭 this deserves millions fr
Amazingly implemented.
Loved the video!
you were so concerned with whether or not you could, you never stopped to consider whether or not you should
Plot twist this video was made by AI
you totally shouldve ended the video with: "So, how did I do? Did I make you think this was a human?"
You should try whisper for the transcription, worked well for me
Bro the volume just went up for some reason on my phone and its loud AF
Broo this shows how far AI has gone you can create 10 AI channels and then 💥 it will blow youtube
this was very interesting, good video
Interesting analysis!
Incredible video, deserves more attention
In shorts is easier as literally people doesn't care if its Ai or human, our fast span mind doesn't calculate that much and just want to watch anything new every 30 seconds, this is why they succeed
This was so good! Thanks for making this
3:05 this is over complicated
You think AI could go through my 300GB of sweet shadowplay clips and make shorts with each one?
Youre still underrated as hell
Is it just me or did this video age like milk with how far and fast ai is moving
this was a super interesting video thank you so much for doing it so perfectly
Btw a tip for this videos thumbnail: include some text like ‘can AI beat a human?’ in it, really anything related to the videos topic that is decently clickbait-y. I think this will increase the amount of views you’ll get by quite a lot.
It would definitely be interesting if you uploaded the videos to other platforms such as tiktok and instagram.
Is at your github the completly code with how you use it, so we can reproduce it by our own? I will try it on my server just for fun
I wish you had given the actual amount of money you made from each channel... that is an important piece of the puzzle
Subtitles @ss😂 2:45
I feel like this kind of stuff would work better with reddit stories rather than quotes.
Wow, this is such an interesting experiment! I love how you've created two distinct channels to compare the success they would achieve. It's fascinating to see the combination of handmade videos and AI-generated content in action. Both approaches have their own unique qualities and advantages.
The handmade videos bring a personal touch and creativity that can truly resonate with viewers. The effort, time, and craftsmanship involved in creating them can be appreciated, and it adds an element of authenticity to the content. On the other hand, the AI-generated channel offers a different perspective, leveraging the power of technology to generate intriguing quotes and facts. It's amazing to witness how AI can contribute to content creation.
I'm excited to see the results of this experiment and discover which channel garners more success. It's a great opportunity to explore the preferences of the audience and understand the impact of different content creation methods. Kudos to you for pushing the boundaries and exploring new avenues in content creation. Keep up the fantastic work, and I'll be eagerly following both channels to see how they progress!
(Written by ChatGPT)
underrated video good job ur very cool subbed
imagine these shorts and as long form content those reddit story reads
Lol you have put in a lot of effor to get subtitles, there are direct AI that can generate captions for the audio
Man i hope you make it because i love the content
Can you please do an updated video about content automation
Very useful experiment!
3:09 don’t look at the second line of code
Do you plan on doing the experiment with long form contents?
Monetising shorts is actually damn hard, Google is keeping so much money
The most amazing thing about this is that google didnt immediately delete the channel
I did the same thing, but I quickly realized it would cost quite a bit of money and probably never generate it back.
How much money did this experiment cost?
I would have liked to know how much the AWS cost for that pipeline was. I'm guessing not that much.
If you wanted to make the AI part a bit smarter, train it to optimise both views and subs, and adjust its content accordingly
tbh i don't like automated channels i usualy block them i am on TH-cam for the people behind the videos :)
Can you make a video on where you will tell how we can use 11labs through api?❤❤❤❤
Amazing video!
I think some kind of combination would rock though
You could vastly improve the ai videos just by using better ai music and ai voice just with the huge improvement in ai since this video came out
Bro you earned my respect by your honesty, even i started my channel listening to this fake youtubers, and now i am stuck because no one gives me feedback whether my videos is good or bad😭
I hope you try again with the new ChatGPT-4o together with whisper. Curious what the results could be and if they'll be any different.