Shaquille O'Neal MONSTER Highlights Of 2000 Finals vs Pacers - 38 PPG, 16.7 RPG, 2.7 BPG | 720pHD
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024
- Watch Shaq's MONSTER Highlights from his first championship in HD quality | Shaquille O'Neal Full Highlights Compilation Of 2000 Finals vs Pacers - 38 PPG, 16.7 RPG, 2.7 BPG
_____________________________________
✅ Sub And Like For More Content
📌 Dawkins Patreon - / freedawkins
📌 Follow on Twitter - / dawkinsmta
📌 IG - / dawkinsofficial
📌 More Vintage And Now-days NBA at FreeDawkins.Com
DISCLAIMER - All clips property of the NBA. No copyright infringement is intended, all videos are edited to follow the "Free Use" guideline of TH-cam.
______________________________________________________
If Shaq stayed in peak shape he could've played a little bit longer
He could be the GOAT
Holy shit the points per game
Shaq is best center
38PPG??? WTF
and 16.7 rebounds lol
38 points, nearly 3 blocks, 3,8 assists, 16,7 rebounds on insanee 61% shooting from the field 😮😮😮
People forget how dominant Shaq was, I think it’s because towards the end of his prime 2004-2006, Lebron became the most dominant player.
If I had to pick, I would take Prime Shaq over Prime LBJ.
Lebron dominant where? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 You mean the 2011 Mavs and Spurs and GSW era ... Where is the dominant 🙄 he got the ring last year as Pandemic Championship of the NBA
@Sam Zheng I think he was the best since like 2006.
@Sam Zheng i understand that the 07 Celtics traded for those pieces but that was the original super team. They formed it to stop a 22-23 year old Lebron
@@zendo09 hes averaged 25pts a game 18 straight times thats the literal definition of dominant.
This Shaq is just monstrous. He is the Laker's flagship player that time.
Kobe knows it, as he is just a mere scorer of a role player. Not to mention that Kobe is not that reliable as Shaq in scoring efficiency during this 3-peat run.
Yeah but that all changed after 2002. Kobe stayed getting better and Shaq got lazy
@@31olegna yup. and that’s what pissed Kobe off. Shaq getting lazy
This is about Shaq being the dominant force on their 3peat. Not after that. Stop that kobe blah blah blah after 2002. Meh
@@hanninaur lol even during their 3peat shaq needed kobe to assist him when they were fighting west teams. When they were against the spurs, kobe carried shaq.
Than you definitely didn't watched those seasons. Only in 2000 Shaq was clearly better player than Kobe, in 2001 and 2001 Lakers played finals only because of KOBE and Kobe was the mean who played the best in play offs in 2001 and 2002, Shaq wasonly better than him in finals, Lakers wouldn't play finals if wasn't Kobe in 2001 and 2002. So, Kobe wouldn't have thise titles without Shaq, and Shaq would also never winthose titles without Kobe, NEVER.
I like how Shaq's head is the last 0 of 2000 in the thumbnail.
2 best player I’ve ever seen.
Holy. Shit. Unbelievable.
If he did drop a few free throws in the series, he would average 40 points per a game.
Indiana and the Nets had nobody close to his size to guard him. Terrible centers to matching against this monster. No wonder they had to quadruple him 😅
No one in the NBA could guard him. Shaq was a monster.
dennis rodman: am I a joke to you ?
*7"4 Rik Smits was not a terrible Center.* Few could stop Shaquille O"Neal.
If Shaquille O"Neal played in the modern league, he would average 45-ppg. FG-60%.
name 1 center at that time that could really guard shaq 1 on 1? Even mutombo got wrecked in the 01 finals. At that time no center could guard shaq 1 on 1 you always had to double or even tripple team him
@@allanhouston6759 Smits was a decent center offensively. Defensively not that great, and no match for Shaq who tossed him around like a ragdoll.
Kobe fans wouldn't like this but kobe's lucky he got these monster at his peak. Those 3 rings is because of Shaq. Most dominant at that time.
Shaq was just as lucky. He's the most dominant at that time for sure and definitely the main option specially during the finals but remove kobe from the team then he wouldn't even reach the finals guaranteed. You dont need to discredit kobe to appreciate shaqs dominance.
Shaq
Without kobe :no chips
With kobe:3 chips
After kobe:1chip 1 finals appearance
Kobe
With shaq:3chips
Without shaq:2chips back to back 3 finals appearances
Who's better?
Than you definitely didn't watched those seasons. Only in 2000 Shaq was clearly better player than Kobe, in 2001 and 2001 Lakers played finals only because of KOBE and Kobe was the mean who played the best in play offs in 2001 and 2002, Shaq wasonly better than him in finals, Lakers wouldn't play finals if wasn't Kobe in 2001 and 2002. So, Kobe wouldn't have thise titles without Shaq, and Shaq would also never winthose titles without Kobe, NEVER.
@@louietv1443 yeah bro, I definitely agree. There are soo many people who hate Kobe that it isn't real.
@@louietv1443 shaqs better
🐐
Shaq
watching this... IDEK what to say...
shaq was a cheatcode
Shaq has no left I just realized that lol
Left hands are optional at 7ft 300lbs🤣
left hand isn’t needed when you’re averaging 40, 17 and 3 on 61%
Who will stop shaq right now in NBA! Hahaha 😂
Dennis Rodman:🤨?
Carried Kobrick so hard. Kobrick averaged like 15 points on 36%
They don't 3 peat without Kobe.
Jalen Rose intentionally injured Kobe in game 2 by sliding his feet under Kobe's feet while Kobe was shooting. This caused Kobe to have an ankle injury that he played through for the rest of the series.
@@31olegna Doesn't matter. Shaq carried them. 38PPG 16.7RPG. Monster
@@hanninaur the east was weak, the finals was decided in the west. without kobe they dont even make the finals
@@brinley1261 pfft. I get that you're a kobe fan but come on appreciate Shaq's dominance on that 3peat👀💪 carried