this man tells it like it is, no lofty romanticized explanations. He speaks, and seconds later, the student knows just what he's talking about. Very direct and I love it.
He aprendido mucho, al ver éste video, sobre cómo interpretar la música, y en especial a chopin; el gran maestro katsaris ha expandido mi horizonte de la apreciación músical y gracias a él he adquirido el hábito de no sólo tocar notas mecánicamente, sino de encontrar lo que el autor de una pieza músical quiso transmitirnos realmente, es decir la verdadera intención, el sentimiento, la escencia de la composición. GRACIAS MAESTRO KATSARIS Y GRACIAS TAMBIÉN A QUIEN HA SUBIDO ÉSTE VIDEO A YT.
Cette sonate à toujours était l'une des œuvres les plus importantes pour moi (pas seulment en ce qui concerne Chopin). Je sais qu'il y a une certaine nostalgie dans ce sentiment et aussi de l'incompréhension dù à son impopularité. Mais il s'y passe tellement de choses, si belles, du début à la fin.. j'ai beau la connaitre par coeur depuis une décenie, j'y decouvre toujours de nouvelles choses à chaque fois que je l'écoute ou la joue, et j'en suis toujours autant fasciné aujourd'hui.
Katsaris is an absolute genius. I love the detailed approach he takes, so many gorgeous inner melodies and sororities otherwise ignored even by other "masters". His technique is so developed (traced back to Liszt) that he can now pay attention to these things, it's amazing.
Sí, de acuerdo; pero hay que tener un grado de mecanización al principio, es decir hay que tener memorizada la pieza, hay que tenerla mecanizada y después interpretada, el proceso inverso creo no es posible: como puedes sentir la pieza, comprender su escencia, como puedes interpretarla si no la mecanizas primero.
Pues no estoy de acuerdo con usted. Antes de saber qué gestos utilizar con las manos, hay que hacer algo de interpretación. Sino, se tiene que gastar mucho mas tiempo más tarde para cambiar todo. Eso que usted dice es como construir una casa sin los dibujos técnicos.
Haha now feel french poeple's despair when everything is in english hahaha No but seriously, it's too bad, he says really interesting stuff in all of these masterclasses, I will try to make some subtitles whenever I have time ! :)
ejecucion-memoria-mecanización-y finalmete interpretación que es la integración de lo anterior a una subjetividad afectivo-emocional de quien interpreta lo que interpreta y que en un sentido riguroso es objetivamente controlada(la interpretación) por las anotaciones del autor en cuanto a matices, crescendos, diminuendos, ritmos, tiempos, texturas, carácteres(temperamento) y hasta por el momento histórico del periodo musical de la pieza que pretendes interpretar.
El ejecutante y el interprete no son lo mismo, de hecho creo que el ejecutante perfecto no es humano sino q debe ser una máquina( un software o algo así), cuando has captado la escencia y la intención de una composición musical y la has adaptado a tu ser con toda seguridad podemos afirmar q has pasado de autómata perfeccionado a intérprete. la ejecución propiamente dicha, es decir la reproducción musical, está supeditada a la técnica, pero el sentimiento es infraestructura de la interpretación.
Eso de que te pasen una partitura para interpretarla en un evento es lo que se llama lectura a primera vista, dependiendo de tu entrenamiento (y talento) musical podrás interpretarla correctemente. Pero ve de nuevo el error en el q caes cuando usas la palabra INTERPRETAR y la confundes con la de EJECUTAR, podríamos pasarnos horas discutiendo sobre esto. Brevemente permíteme explicarte lo q para mí es el PROCESO de INTERPRETACIÓN MUSICAl, creo es como sigue:
He does say interesting things, but what is his intent? Does he really expect this student to play the sonata with all his very specific directions? For example, at around 3:02 "No! Pianissimo without pedal the second one." That is a nice touch, but why should a young student do it just because Katsaris demands it? Chopin didn't. The fact is, it is the underlying idea of making something of the music that is important, not the specifics. That is what the student should take home with her.
Agreed completely. Actually, although he does it in a very nice way, i don't imagine it pleasant to be a student there, machinely reproducing his view. I prefer the way of Jorge Bolet, trying to win over the student with his interpretation rather than dictating it.
He does say interesting things, but what is his intent? Does he really expect this student to play the sonata with all his very specific directions? For example, at around 3:02 "No! Pianissimo without pedal the second one." That is a nice touch, but why should a young student do it just because Katsaris demands it? Chopin didn't. The fact is, it is the underlying idea of making something of the music that is important, not the specifics. That is what the student should take home with her.
He's not demanding anything, he's just asking her to learn a different way to play that part for when it repeats later on in the piece. He actually started by telling her she played it really well. He made her play it 'his' way in order for her to have more freedom and choose, or simply have more variety.
I completely agree with camaysar. There is no objective reasoning. He is teaching her "one" interpretation and doesn't even explain why he believes this one is the right one.
He does say interesting things, but what is his intent? Does he really expect this student to play the sonata with all his very specific directions? For example, after 3:02 "No! Pianissimo without pedal for the second one." That is a nice touch, but why should a young student do it just because Katsaris demands it? Chopin didn't. The fact is, it is the underlying idea of making something of the music that is important, not the specifics. That is what the student should take home with her.
this man tells it like it is, no lofty romanticized explanations. He speaks, and seconds later, the student knows just what he's talking about. Very direct and I love it.
He aprendido mucho, al ver éste video, sobre cómo interpretar la música, y en especial a chopin; el gran maestro katsaris ha expandido mi horizonte de la apreciación músical y gracias a él he adquirido el hábito de no sólo tocar notas mecánicamente, sino de encontrar lo que el autor de una pieza músical quiso transmitirnos realmente, es decir la verdadera intención, el sentimiento, la escencia de la composición. GRACIAS MAESTRO KATSARIS Y GRACIAS TAMBIÉN A QUIEN HA SUBIDO ÉSTE VIDEO A YT.
Cette sonate à toujours était l'une des œuvres les plus importantes pour moi (pas seulment en ce qui concerne Chopin). Je sais qu'il y a une certaine nostalgie dans ce sentiment et aussi de l'incompréhension dù à son impopularité. Mais il s'y passe tellement de choses, si belles, du début à la fin.. j'ai beau la connaitre par coeur depuis une décenie, j'y decouvre toujours de nouvelles choses à chaque fois que je l'écoute ou la joue, et j'en suis toujours autant fasciné aujourd'hui.
She was very good. Technically very flexible and very musical. And Katsaris is the right man too.
A great reason for me to improve my French! Would love to know immediately what Mr. Katsaris is saying.
Katsaris is an absolute genius. I love the detailed approach he takes, so many gorgeous inner melodies and sororities otherwise ignored even by other "masters". His technique is so developed (traced back to Liszt) that he can now pay attention to these things, it's amazing.
How does he develop the technique to understand the emotion of each measure? And what do you mean it’s traced back to Liszt?
xtaylorxboyx 雀蜂 he was the student of george cziffra which in turn was a student of liszt.
@@xtaylorxboyx Decades of research and just a full understanding of Chopin, he’s one of the all time greatest
これめっちゃ参考になるわ
I wish these were in English or at least had subtitles.
これ・・・・まるで自分がレッスン受けた感じになるわ・・・
Amazing 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
You are fantastick!!!
How does she remember all those points without making notes on the score? I would have a pencil at the ready in case I forgot!
Hard to believe he was 42 years old here... He looks much older. I hope his health is ok.
Göktuğ Kaya I feel his hair adds an additional 15 years lol
Chopin nocturne in C sharp minor opus 27 no 1
Sí, de acuerdo; pero hay que tener un grado de mecanización al principio, es decir hay que tener memorizada la pieza, hay que tenerla mecanizada y después interpretada, el proceso inverso creo no es posible: como puedes sentir la pieza, comprender su escencia, como puedes interpretarla si no la mecanizas primero.
Pues no estoy de acuerdo con usted. Antes de saber qué gestos utilizar con las manos, hay que hacer algo de interpretación. Sino, se tiene que gastar mucho mas tiempo más tarde para cambiar todo. Eso que usted dice es como construir una casa sin los dibujos técnicos.
Can someone please tell me what is he playing at 10:47?
Beethoven - Opening theme of Symphony no. 6, mov. I (Pastoral)
@@christopherwyatt8124 thanks!
Haha now feel french poeple's despair when everything is in english hahaha
No but seriously, it's too bad, he says really interesting stuff in all of these masterclasses, I will try to make some subtitles whenever I have time ! :)
Cna you PLEASE add english subtitles? PLEASEE
What part you need help with?
Have to learn either Japanese or French to know what he’s talking about
9:09
ejecucion-memoria-mecanización-y finalmete interpretación que es la integración de lo anterior a una subjetividad afectivo-emocional de quien interpreta lo que interpreta y que en un sentido riguroso es objetivamente controlada(la interpretación) por las anotaciones del autor en cuanto a matices, crescendos, diminuendos, ritmos, tiempos, texturas, carácteres(temperamento) y hasta por el momento histórico del periodo musical de la pieza que pretendes interpretar.
El ejecutante y el interprete no son lo mismo, de hecho creo que el ejecutante perfecto no es humano sino q debe ser una máquina( un software o algo así), cuando has captado la escencia y la intención de una composición musical y la has adaptado a tu ser con toda seguridad podemos afirmar q has pasado de autómata perfeccionado a intérprete.
la ejecución propiamente dicha, es decir la reproducción musical, está supeditada a la técnica, pero el sentimiento es infraestructura de la interpretación.
Eso de que te pasen una partitura para interpretarla en un evento es lo que se llama lectura a primera vista, dependiendo de tu entrenamiento (y talento) musical podrás interpretarla correctemente.
Pero ve de nuevo el error en el q caes cuando usas la palabra INTERPRETAR y la confundes con la de EJECUTAR, podríamos pasarnos horas discutiendo sobre esto. Brevemente permíteme explicarte lo q para mí es el PROCESO de INTERPRETACIÓN MUSICAl, creo es como sigue:
why in french :'(
Chan Nguyen and why not?
Because Katsaris is french
3:03 sexual assault. She/he/it/Ze/They didn't consent! Jail and career end immediately! Lock up this monster!
CATSARIS >>> CATARSIS
c est une honte c qui ce mec il a quel diplome ? il connait quoi de chopin?
He does say interesting things, but what is his intent? Does he really expect this student to play the sonata with all his very specific directions? For example, at around 3:02 "No! Pianissimo without pedal the second one." That is a nice touch, but why should a young student do it just because Katsaris demands it? Chopin didn't. The fact is, it is the underlying idea of making something of the music that is important, not the specifics. That is what the student should take home with her.
Agreed completely. Actually, although he does it in a very nice way, i don't imagine it pleasant to be a student there, machinely reproducing his view. I prefer the way of Jorge Bolet, trying to win over the student with his interpretation rather than dictating it.
He just introduced in the lesson that there is such a way if you want to do it.
You don’t understand what he is saying Jesus people make comments without thinking
Quite pathetic meeting. What is the of copying every line? Shouldnt there be some plane of imagination? Creativity?
Bla bla bla
633223
No point in having a masterclass, if the pupil lacks the technique to play the piece correctly.
rationalistx lol everybody does mistakes chill out
Agreed
she did really well
He does say interesting things, but what is his intent? Does he really expect this student to play the sonata with all his very specific directions? For example, at around 3:02 "No! Pianissimo without pedal the second one." That is a nice touch, but why should a young student do it just because Katsaris demands it? Chopin didn't. The fact is, it is the underlying idea of making something of the music that is important, not the specifics. That is what the student should take home with her.
You don’t understand the french if you did you wouldn’t make this comment
He's not demanding anything, he's just asking her to learn a different way to play that part for when it repeats later on in the piece. He actually started by telling her she played it really well. He made her play it 'his' way in order for her to have more freedom and choose, or simply have more variety.
I completely agree with camaysar. There is no objective reasoning. He is teaching her "one" interpretation and doesn't even explain why he believes this one is the right one.
He does say interesting things, but what is his intent? Does he really expect this student to play the sonata with all his very specific directions? For example, after 3:02 "No! Pianissimo without pedal for the second one." That is a nice touch, but why should a young student do it just because Katsaris demands it? Chopin didn't. The fact is, it is the underlying idea of making something of the music that is important, not the specifics. That is what the student should take home with her.
he explains his own interpretation. listen his carnegie hall perfomance of this sonata .
7：33 aussi
Once again you don’t understand French, if you did you wouldn’t make this comment
Analysis-Paralysis