You can feel the emotional angle this is being presented from. It’s taken so personally like it was his uncle killed last week. And missed out stacks of the facts. And this is funded by the BBC?! Bizarre false history lesson.
In the writings of Critical Theory between the "priestly class" of it, the originators (nothing wrong with that), one of the main concerns is trying to shut down & suppress questioning, reason or analysis or discussion or debate and gain acceptance using Emotionally Manipulative Methods. Standard cult (i.e. controlling) behavior. I don't think it is the blantantness of their racist ideology that is so bad (similar attitudes as Hitler towards the Jews); or the belief that if you have less power or numbers your entitled to low ethics - that is protected as free speech - it is the manipulative way it is taught, and the intention to create resentment & conflict or guilt (both which gains power).
As with everything in the media people should not take the statements made as gospel,do your home work to make sure it’s verifiable. If you don’t you are lending yourself to be used. There is always a narrative.
There was no lynching here, he and his fellow sailors started a fight, stabbed several Swedish sailors, slashed a policeman who tried to intervene and shot two policemen when they came to arrest them for attempted murder. He was chased by the police and local population while trying to evade the arrest and get to his ship. He fell in the water and drowned because he couldn't swim.
It only makes sense when you realise they know it's wrong and push the agenda anyway. Deliberate misinformation is the only dequate explaination for the BBC being so wrong, so often.
3:07 "Charles Wootton who was NOT part of the riot, SUDDENLY became a target of the mob." How could he not have been involved in the riot after having killed a policeman and wounded another? @BBC Stories
Isn't it sad, that the BBC has put this forward without putting in ALL of the facts around this incident, and what Charles Wootton really was and how much of a major part he played in insighting the trouble that night, should there be any sort of plaque put up, if anyone goes around stabbing people, shooting at people, but even worse is this is not a true reflection on what happened that night, and a totally different story is being put forward to create tension between people, and I would like to think that if the true facts were presented, that the black community wouldn't like to represented in this portrayal.
Read the Londonderry sentinel 7 June 1919, Yorkshire evening post 6 June 1919 and Liverpool watch committee 17 June 1919. You will find the facts of the case, it was no lynching this man shot several people stabbed several others then died whilst attempting to avoid being apprehended.
Also read the Sun, Daily Mail, The Daily Express and the Evening Standard dated 1989 - which said that Liverpool supporters were drunk, violent and pilfering from the dying ....... Hold on wait a minute?!
I’ve just researched this. Two policemen had been shot and he was being chased as he was suspected of being the shooter. Why didn’t the BBC mention this in the report ?
What's more worrying is that this hasn't been done by a "boy who cried wolf", but by a "serious academic in a position of national influence". Furthermore, it hasn't been done for the purposes of "mischief", but for the purposes of "inciting social division, lawlessness and violence and (long term) undermining culture and government".
0:00: Because you’re in Britain, mate, and your learning about British people and British history. Imagine being a white man in China and whining because you “can’t relate” to the emperors and warriors you’re taught about,
Strangely no mention of the two policemen the black sailors shot. Also, how does a drowning become a lynching? “I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you.” ― Nietzsche
Rather alarmingly, I'm getting a load of YT recommendations for other videos about the "lynching" of Charles Wooten. Whoever initiated this vile piece of propaganda clearly knew what they were doing...
In Cardiff the Migrants were also grooming/pimping out White girls, replaced the White population tin some areas after they went to fight in WW1 and stabbed/shot the returning soldiers
I think the BBC should up sticks & start a broadcasting company in Africa or somewhere.then impose their license fee scam on the populace & at the same time.Tell all the folk there that they are scummy people.but tell the staff not to go near water at anytime.I wouldn't miss them.
There was no legally defined black population in Britain in 1919. But there were large numbers of Caribbean transients found in most docks. All this story proves is that the West Indian problem has been in Britain for much longer than we knew.
King James who had the 1611 bible written was a black man, Ann Boleyn swarthy, the Jacobites lost the crown and sent into slavery or murdered. Something happened world wide in the 1800's history was rewritten, in Britain the crown became German, they are from Vlad the Impaler and the queen is a granddaughter++ of Muhammad ( the Muslim creator man.)
Problem? Isn’t it weird how that ‘problem’ was conveniently good enough when needed to rebuild Britain after the war. You didn’t regard those people as problems when you needed their labour. Tbh the British government is known to have destroyed millions of records about the Cold War, slave trade and the empire. How can anything they teach be regarded as historically accurate?
@@venalisa3116 these racists degenerate will find a reason to justify their hatred. Just look at the comment section on this film/documentary. They are making all kind of allegations against Charles Wootton. The chief allegation is that he had shot a policeman therefore the instigator of the riot. Then they are portraying the Scandinavian seamen and the white Liverpool population as victims. They are even saying that one policeman tried to save Charle Wootton...smh. These degenerates have no shame.
@@idratherbeaphilthanajustin9533 sorry to burst yours but people were brought over from the Caribbean during Windrush for a reason… People from CommonWealth countries were also forced to fight during WW1 (1914-1918).
You don't learn Alt history in school like this because its bunkem! For a factual take on this particular subject see Simon Webbs short video that debunks most of the premises underpinning this nonsense, all paid for by the BBC licence payer: th-cam.com/video/srY_1kPCcLY/w-d-xo.html All these young people should be brought back after watching Simon Webb and then ask them what they now think?
We have had a community of Black and white people living together in Southern Liverpool, they have been least 200 years if not more. In 1919 there was a police strike where the army was brought in, I know of this because my mother was involved , she was nine years old I had heard about Charles Wooton because a centre had been named after him. This is a great fat lie and should be investigated properly with the fact exposed I know for a fact that this would have have been spread around Livrrpool like wildfire Tjhe circumstances must have been recorded in the newspapers if someone had been lynched then fair enough cause a stink but don't forget inconvenient facts.
"so all of this started based on the fact white women thought black men were superior" whoa there little bird, be careful, love isn't about superiority, its about, connections.
i think it's more that back then, can u imagine some stiff upper lipped british guy being a good lover n considerate of 'his' woman's sexual needs? Besides, there is an evolutionary advantage via better immunity for any offspring. so faced with the choice, hell yeah, i love me a foreigner -they usually more fascinating than the locals u grew up with like a bunch of siblings anyway ... ;)
They aren't really talking about the full picture, these riots were for the most part fueled by the unemployment, as many servicemen and sailors were returning back to Britain in 1919, there wasn't a lot of work, and in some of the docks areas there was anger at wages being undercut for cheaper foreign workers. There is more to the incident with Charles Wootton also. The fight broke out between black sailors and swedes, to which the black sailors had pulled out razors and knives(sailors often did carry knives or firearms) a policeman intervened but was slashed across the face, until he was fell to the ground with exhaustion. More police and a mob had arrived chasing the black sailors to their quarters where they were living. From the house shots from a revolver were fired out wounding several policemen, one shot through the neck and was in a serious condition in hospital. Charles Wootton had ran from the house were the sailors were in which the shots from one revolver had come from, at which point the mob had grabbed him and he ended up in the water, whether thrown in or fell in, its not entirely clear. This is what is reported in the newspapers at the time.
Perhaps we heard about the British soldiers because nearly one million died. And hostility to outsiders was unique to the UK? I knew someone who married a Zulu women. There was hostility in the women's family to her prospective white husband as he wasn't black and wasn't Zulu. Shame on the BBC for stirring unnecessary racial hatred.
These riots also deeply affected the Chinese community too. Similar disgusting stereotypes of interracial couples. They set fire to the houses of Chinese people because they had white wives in the East End London, 1919
Consider yourself lucky that you're not being taught these lies .. unless you're more comfortable to continue virtue signaling,then stay on that soap box
This is not history, it is a story miss told to aggravate racial tension, look up the story as reported in the newspapers of the area and time of the incident, the person who sadly drowned was being pursued for a criminal act he was suspected of wounding and killing British police officers and also of wounding a Scandinavian sailor, he was not being chased on account of his race .
Do some proper research on this, my friend. You'll find it's absolute bullshit. The BBC you might have grown up with which was respected throughout the world for its quality broadcasting is long gone. They're more than happy to peddle lies these days. As this proves.
I would like to know why it’s always about black and white? What about the discrimination of the Irish in Britain that came before, what about Italian discrimination that came before as well? What about how discrimstiin about catholics? Yeah you can’t change the colour of your skin, but you can’t also change being Irish or Italian and given the times it happened you also couldn’t just change your religion after being brought up with it amongst your family, kind of getting bored now of all this. It’s a way of learning but I don’t see how this would solve anything by bringing it all up, it’s going to cause more tension than there already is. And I don’t see why you can be frustrated and angry at something that happened over 100 years ago. I’m part Irish and I don’t feel frustration to how my ancestor were treated or the catholic ones. My Scottish great great grandfather was killed in the first war by a German over 100 years ago leaving 6 children orphaned, don’t see why I should be frustrated with Germans just cause he was basically murdered by one. A two great great uncles were also killed in the first and second war by Germans leaving families heartbroken and causing one of the mothers to die a week later cause she couldn’t take it and the other to live her days wondering what ever happened to the body of her son. It’s all in the past. People move on. What happened to Charles was a tragedy, but to hold on to it after all this time, and constantly want to talk about it and pin point how bad whites were back then can only do more damage, as if we are still being hated in for the actions people took all those years ago. And although Britain is still a racist country, it’s not as racist as it was back then
I was born and grew up in south east London and, I´m a white male. I clearly remember the riots in the late 80´s and also, the wise words and vision of great Mr. Enoch Powell in the late 1960´s! This video reflects on the past, and not the present! Oh, and by the way, when it comes to real slavery, black and white peoples´ enslavement, the Jews were at the forefront of this once thriving and inhuman business!
@@kimwarburton8490 Hello Kim, if that´s your real name. I have chosen only one link from which, you will eventually understand, that the official version of black slavery, is as false and untrue, as the official version of WWll! Enjoy, or perhaps, no! th-cam.com/video/51EZ0vLxWK8/w-d-xo.html
4 ปีที่แล้ว +3
I keep telling people Britain only stopped lynching people three years before America did. Interestingly, the last person lynched was white.
@@mcr2356 There were very few on either side of the Atlantic, only dozens in the entire 19th and 20th century. "Massively" different, seeing as how few there were in the United States must mean the UK had MORE. There were only 2,107 lynchings in the United States going back two hundred years before the United States existed and only sixteen from now back to the end of the 19th century (122 years ago) and only TWO in the 20th century. Over 80% of those were when the United States was a colony of a certain world power. But you say it was massively different in Britain. If it was "massively different", seeing as I know the numbers in the United States were so incredibly low that must mean you Brits lynched a whole lot of people, huh? Because there is no way to go DOWN from the vast number of "two", so you must mean they were MORE violent, right? Or were you just talking out of your ass about a subject you know nothing about? See, I think it's a subject you know nothing about, but WANT to be thought of as knowing about. You *want* to be better than those yanks, but those gosh darned facts are in the way. Huh.
@ Your figures are massively wrong, you know it. It's not a dick measuring contest. Britain didn't have a big history of lynching in the 18th to the 20th century, dosnt make the country better.
This is not in anyway intended to be negative. I am a white English female and just want to know two things...firstly, there was little known about different ethnic issues a hundred years ago so don’t you think we have progressed from then? And if this was an all cast of white people complaining about ethnic issues that they have suffered wouldn’t that be a big no no and it would be called a racist programme? There are always two sides...just saying.
Here come your white tears, what sort of “ethnic” issues have white people faced in this country at the hands of minorities?! This video is just detailing a violent racial attack and murder of an innocent black man that occurred in the UK. His story was never told so that’s why they’ve made a video explaining what had happened. In this very case there are no two sides as he was in fact murdered in a racial attack. Stop coming under videos that are teaching us about the lost history of the many struggles black people had to face at the hands of your ancestors.
Sweet Dreams Have progressed..no, there are not so many out and out murders anymore racism is just a lot more sophisticated now, and in many ways much more insidious. Here is a perfect example th-cam.com/video/1x0G4NCBTzg/w-d-xo.html
Please tell me you are all black Americans? Because in England I do not see the struggles America has. And if so, why is it so nasty for you? Make me understand. All my black friends don’t seem to take issue with it or is it because I am in the U.K.?
@@yareyaredaze9656 hey, I live right down south 60 miles from London, my neighbors are from The Gambia and there is no issues at all, in fact they are one of the friendliest families in the close. But no offence to my northern citizens they have more issues, they call us ‘southern softies’ and bowl it around thinking they are well hard lol but it’s more poverty up north so maybe that’s a factor? Btw thanks for replying, I see America in a sad state and like they are living 50yrs ago...
@@daniscottxo There is more to this story that what was said. Several police officers were shot and injured from a single revolver coming from the house the sailors were in, Charles Wootton had ran from the house, in which the angry mob saw him as guilty as coming from the house, I'm not saying he was the one the fired the shots, but there is more to this story than what this vid is claiming. The fight with the Swedes that started it all escalated when the Black sailors drew razors in the altercation, to which a police officer intervening had his face slashed up. To which a mob and several police chased this group back to the house they were staying at, which then resulted in the shooting of the revolver.
Again another race baiting dishonesty. The reason why police officer wanted rest black sailor is that black sailor had knocked one police officer down and police went to arrest him. The black sailors went to their quarters and locked themselves inside. People gathers around and one black sailor started to shoot at the police and 2 were hit. This of course caused more excitement among crowd and when one black sailor tried to flee. They though he was shooter. They chased him and he fell into the docks and drowned cause he couldn't swim. Calling this a race riot is a lie. It was drunken brawl between Scandinavian and black sailors that went out of control.
Because it never happened. They neglected to mention that the fella who drowned was being chased because he and his acquaintances had just attacked and killed three policemen and he was the main suspect and tried to flee.
Wootton shot 2 policemen, one in the head? 11 were charged with attempted murder for slashing and stabbing the policeman who tried to break up the fight at the pub? he doesn't cite a source for this or "throwing rocks at him"? Because it's a fabrication!
I'm a white man, this part of British history was never taught to us. Personally I don't see different races, I see a fellow human being. Like all races including whites, there are good and bad, respect me and I will respect you.
If there is no difference in the races and we can all get along, why do they not want to learn British history, as was stated at the start of the video? They're British, right? But they don't want to learn about historical British people. That makes no sense.
Possibly the reason you weren’t taught it was because it didn’t happen. This video was a biased, one sided incomplete reporting designed to initiate racial tension - pure BBC.
Remember this is a BBC video. I'm attaching a counter argument that needs airing. If it is true the BBC have something to answer for. th-cam.com/video/srY_1kPCcLY/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=HistoryDebunked
Nice collection of experts and historians btw! I'm from Cardiff and we've always been proud of our multiracial city! So enough of this horseshit ... Cardiff aint Louisiana!! ffs!
I think he was using the word lynched to try and draw a comparison between the USA and the UK. The man who died drowned after the mob pushed him in the water and threw stones at him. He was murdered and they did not find or prosecute the perpetrators. It is not what happened in the USA in action, scale or timeframe. In the USA 3,500 African Americans and 1,300 white Anericans were lynched between 1882 and 1968. In the 1919 UK riots there were two murders of BAME and three murders of white people, and it wasnt on the scale of the USA 1919 riots (Red Summer ) en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Summer There is quite a lot of information online about the UK riots. Wives and girlfriends were treated badly, children grew up without their fathers who were repatriated to their home countries, men separated from their families. Whole communities felt considerable fear for some time due to the rioters. It was really terrible. I havent read all of this, but I think it's a comprehensive look at what was happening www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/6874/D086172.pdf%3Fsequence%3D1%26isAllowed%3Dy&ved=2ahUKEwiqsaf4uufqAhUYSBUIHahxBb0QFjAJegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw1UExr2ux3PN5g7mcjjI-cm
They didn’t, although we still were legally using hanging as a method of execution, up until 1964 if memory serves. Don’t get me wrong, racial tension in London in 1919 was documented as being a serious problem, but i think some people are getting confused between American and British history by the use of this term. Lynching was certainly not a common practice in the UK as it was in the states.
Charles Wooten was part of a black group/ gang of men that had an argument with Scandinavian sailors. Woo trim himself a sailor. Unfortunately the woke “ black people are innocent of everything “ approach here is lies. Woo trim and others attacked Scandinavians and when the politeness up they shot 2 police officers… Because of this a gang with police surrounding a house , Wootton tried to make his escape and ran towards the river where he fell in or was pushed in, there is no evidence to support what happened. It is reported he was hit with a stone and drowned. He along with the black gangs had knives and guns which were used violently towards whites and police. Charles Wootton had a college/ training building in upper Parliament street named after him. For an explanation see History debunked on TH-cam. David Olusoga’s book also twists this story to appeal to a black racist agenda. Like the fraudulent Black Lives Matter in the US people are sick to death with the notion that everything is racist. Whilst the 18 th Century Slavs trade was abhorrent it wasn’t the worst event in history, it wasn’t even the worst slavery event, the Muslin people enslaved people and treated them more severely but we don’t hear much about that. Neither do we hear of the black African leaders who sold their own people. Today Haiti is controlled by slavery but we don’t hear black people condemning that. Nor do we hear them condemning the Romans for enslaving the white British. It’s time black people got over slavery that hasn’t affected them for hundreds of years and tried to get on with life without playing the race card .
This is a lie. First, the fight they mentioned broke out the previous night with a gang of Scandinavian sailors. Wootton was in a mob of black sailors who returned to the pub the following night for revenge with knives and straight razors and stabbed up the Scandinavians, as well as attempting to slash the throat of a passing police officer who tried to stop them. The cops showed up in numbers and arrested them for a series of stabbings, not just for being black in a street fight. Second, after they returned to their boarding house, Wootton fired a pistol at the cops, wounded two officers (one of them in the throat) and fled with a hue-and-cry behind him. After this, he either fell, jumped or was pushed into the dock. Myself, I doubt anyone in the crowd would've been in a hurry to approach an armed man. TL, DR; Wootton wasn't whistling down the street minding his own business when he was set upon by an angry mob, he was fleeing the cops as one of a number of men wanted for several attempted murders.
The BBC and the lying Olugosa obviously have so many examples of racism to choose from that they have to completely falsify the one they chose. How weird is that!
Been circulating this incredible #AltHistory series by #BBCStories since the summer!! Stunning stories and its utterly shameful that #BlackBritishStories erase us#WhiteWashing #BlackHistory #BritishHistory #BlackSoldiers #BlackRegiment #ForgottenRegiment #BlackBritishMen
Total misrepresentation of the truth. What about the fate of the police that were slashed and shot by him and his friends ?
The BBC should be ashamed of itself imo.
Lies, lies and more lies from the BBC !
yes lies
You can feel the emotional angle this is being presented from. It’s taken so personally like it was his uncle killed last week. And missed out stacks of the facts. And this is funded by the BBC?! Bizarre false history lesson.
Don't watch BBC. Don't pay your licence fee.
Adaptable Teacher: I have not owned a TV for almost two years now, and I do not intend to get a replacement in the foreseeable future.
I don't, didn't get jabbed either. . . .
It’s funny how you just forgot to mention that Charles Wooton had just shot a police officer and the reason the police were after him
Cancelled my bbc tax a year ago one of the best decisions I ever made!
Report the video
@@stewartw.9151 I doubt it will do anything but yeah. For example, this video is still up: th-cam.com/video/BYZ2XoaBO2A/w-d-xo.html
@@Zanuka If many report this lying trash, then they may take it seriously. We must not keep silent.
@@stewartw.9151 Agreed.
I feel sorry for the people in this video. The BBC certainly know how to use gullible people to stir up undue animosity.
In the writings of Critical Theory between the "priestly class" of it, the originators (nothing wrong with that), one of the main concerns is trying to shut down & suppress questioning, reason or analysis or discussion or debate and gain acceptance using Emotionally Manipulative Methods. Standard cult (i.e. controlling) behavior.
I don't think it is the blantantness of their racist ideology that is so bad (similar attitudes as Hitler towards the Jews); or the belief that if you have less power or numbers your entitled to low ethics - that is protected as free speech - it is the manipulative way it is taught, and the intention to create resentment & conflict or guilt (both which gains power).
Since forever we've been forced to believe whitewashed history in school so that was pretty gullible of us
The BBC: 'Whoops, oh dear, we forgot to turn the comments off!'
Tell the truth, it wasn't a lynching.
This is a disgusting lie. Don’t buy a TV licence.
#ScumMedia
As with everything in the media people should not take the statements made as gospel,do your home work to make sure it’s verifiable. If you don’t you are lending yourself to be used. There is always a narrative.
Report the video
Useful idiots there called
There was no lynching here, he and his fellow sailors started a fight, stabbed several Swedish sailors, slashed a policeman who tried to intervene and shot two policemen when they came to arrest them for attempted murder. He was chased by the police and local population while trying to evade the arrest and get to his ship. He fell in the water and drowned because he couldn't swim.
Is this really the BBC or just somebody using the logo, hard to imagine the BBC is this misinformed?
It only makes sense when you realise they know it's wrong and push the agenda anyway. Deliberate misinformation is the only dequate explaination for the BBC being so wrong, so often.
To be balanced and accurate would you please make another film to tell the truth based on all the available evidence
I was taught british history in British oohhhh nooo loool
* in Britain 😉
"We are BBC Stories, a group of journalists" Real journalists do research and give unbiased reports, have a word with yourselves! Pathetic!
They are the equivalent of money launderers except they launder history rather than money.
@@BANKO007 Launder? This is utter, dishonest, fabrication, with evil intent.
@@robm8809 I was being as kind as possible.
LIES!
Alt history is the right name for this. It's alternative history in that it isn't true.
Why do they say “white men” no mate we are native men
Indigenous English!
No mate u guys came from scandanavia
@@tropicalstormxox9444 Oh dear!
@@idratherbeaphilthanajustin9533 Caucas mountain Philstine Neanderthal head ahh
3:07 "Charles Wootton who was NOT part of the riot, SUDDENLY became a target of the mob."
How could he not have been involved in the riot after having killed a policeman and wounded another? @BBC Stories
Because of racism
@@smithandsuperdeadeyeofthew823 Forgot that holding Blacks accountable for their actions was racist
bollox
Lies!!!! BBC
Isn't it sad, that the BBC has put this forward without putting in ALL of the facts around this incident, and what Charles Wootton really was and how much of a major part he played in insighting the trouble that night, should there be any sort of plaque put up, if anyone goes around stabbing people, shooting at people, but even worse is this is not a true reflection on what happened that night, and a totally different story is being put forward to create tension between people, and I would like to think that if the true facts were presented, that the black community wouldn't like to represented in this portrayal.
Read the Londonderry sentinel 7 June 1919, Yorkshire evening post 6 June 1919 and Liverpool watch committee 17 June 1919. You will find the facts of the case, it was no lynching this man shot several people stabbed several others then died whilst attempting to avoid being apprehended.
Also read the Sun, Daily Mail, The Daily Express and the Evening Standard dated 1989 - which said that Liverpool supporters were drunk, violent and pilfering from the dying ....... Hold on wait a minute?!
I’ve just researched this. Two policemen had been shot and he was being chased as he was suspected of being the shooter. Why didn’t the BBC mention this in the report ?
Didn't this guy shoot multiple police officers? The cherry picking of facts is shocking. Bbc you've let yourself down.
This is “Race baiting” of the worst kind!
This never happened, that's why you never heard of it. Remember the story of the boy who cried Wolf.
What's more worrying is that this hasn't been done by a "boy who cried wolf", but by a "serious academic in a position of national influence". Furthermore, it hasn't been done for the purposes of "mischief", but for the purposes of "inciting social division, lawlessness and violence and (long term) undermining culture and government".
@LonerBlack66 with that logic, as you weren't either, your comment is pointless.
Please go and see an honest recount of these events at the history debunked channel.
that's what brought me here. Hello from 'Merican South. Our history is lied about too.
0:00: Because you’re in Britain, mate, and your learning about British people and British history. Imagine being a white man in China and whining because you “can’t relate” to the emperors and warriors you’re taught about,
not like most of our ancestors were stolen to come here or anything...
@@belb6759 Not to Britain no
@@belb6759 Windrush weren't forced to Britain. They migrated.
@@belb6759 Not stolen. Sold. Not to Britain. Your forebears decided to come here. Ģive thanks for their good judgement.
@@belb6759 No one was stolen and taken here you fool!
Strangely no mention of the two policemen the black sailors shot. Also, how does a drowning become a lynching? “I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you.”
― Nietzsche
Reported this video for inciting racial hatred.
NEVER LET THE FACTS GET IN THE WAY OF A GOOD STORY. Lies, lies and damned lies.
Rather alarmingly, I'm getting a load of YT recommendations for other videos about the "lynching" of Charles Wooten. Whoever initiated this vile piece of propaganda clearly knew what they were doing...
Bet they will turn off comments in a bit
Please check out the truth by watching the History Debunked TH-cam channel, it is important to know the truth.
Riots at the time were apparently based on violence between groups of sailors. Black sailors and European sailors were killed in these fights.
In Cardiff the Migrants were also grooming/pimping out White girls, replaced the White population tin some areas after they went to fight in WW1 and stabbed/shot the returning soldiers
Malicious lies with evil intent
I think the BBC should up sticks & start a broadcasting company in Africa or somewhere.then impose their license fee scam on the populace & at the same time.Tell all the folk there that they are scummy people.but tell the staff not to go near water at anytime.I wouldn't miss them.
It's thanks purely to the BBC's relentless campaign of disinformation that I no longer have a TV.
There was no legally defined black population in Britain in 1919. But there were large numbers of Caribbean transients found in most docks. All this story proves is that the West Indian problem has been in Britain for much longer than we knew.
King James who had the 1611 bible written was a black man, Ann Boleyn swarthy, the Jacobites lost the crown and sent into slavery or murdered. Something happened world wide in the 1800's history was rewritten, in Britain the crown became German, they are from Vlad the Impaler and the queen is a granddaughter++ of Muhammad ( the Muslim creator man.)
Problem? Isn’t it weird how that ‘problem’ was conveniently good enough when needed to rebuild Britain after the war. You didn’t regard those people as problems when you needed their labour.
Tbh the British government is known to have destroyed millions of records about the Cold War, slave trade and the empire. How can anything they teach be regarded as historically accurate?
@@venalisa3116 these racists degenerate will find a reason to justify their hatred. Just look at the comment section on this film/documentary. They are making all kind of allegations against Charles Wootton. The chief allegation is that he had shot a policeman therefore the instigator of the riot. Then they are portraying the Scandinavian seamen and the white Liverpool population as victims. They are even saying that one policeman tried to save Charle Wootton...smh. These degenerates have no shame.
@@venalisa3116 Sorry to burst your bubble, but the people who 'rebuilt Britain' as you put it were British and Irish construction workers.
@@idratherbeaphilthanajustin9533 sorry to burst yours but people were brought over from the Caribbean during Windrush for a reason…
People from CommonWealth countries were also forced to fight during WW1 (1914-1918).
IT WOULD BE REAL NEWS IF YOU THE BBC PUBLISH YOUR THUMBS DOWN ON THIS ONE WILL YOU?
Did you know, Charles wonton shot two police officers in the face after stabbing a Scandinavian sailor to death…..
STOP THE LIES
You don't learn Alt history in school like this because its bunkem! For a factual take on this particular subject see Simon Webbs short video that debunks most of the premises underpinning this nonsense, all paid for by the BBC licence payer:
th-cam.com/video/srY_1kPCcLY/w-d-xo.html
All these young people should be brought back after watching Simon Webb and then ask them what they now think?
just shows how gullible people are, that's why this country is in a mess
Fake history here
I wonder how accurate this account is...
oops forgeting to mention he shot 2 police killing one of them and stabing a 3rd police man in the neck
I pay my license fee for this ?!
We have had a community of Black and white people living together in Southern Liverpool, they have been least 200 years if not more. In 1919 there was a police strike where the army was brought in, I know of this because my mother was involved , she was nine years old I had heard about Charles Wooton because a centre had been named after him.
This is a great fat lie and should be investigated properly with the fact exposed I know for a fact that this would have have been spread around Livrrpool like wildfire Tjhe circumstances must have been recorded in the newspapers if someone had been lynched then fair enough cause a stink but don't forget inconvenient facts.
"so all of this started based on the fact white women thought black men were superior" whoa there little bird, be careful, love isn't about superiority, its about, connections.
i think it's more that back then, can u imagine some stiff upper lipped british guy being a good lover n considerate of 'his' woman's sexual needs? Besides, there is an evolutionary advantage via better immunity for any offspring. so faced with the choice, hell yeah, i love me a foreigner -they usually more fascinating than the locals u grew up with like a bunch of siblings anyway ... ;)
They aren't really talking about the full picture, these riots were for the most part fueled by the unemployment, as many servicemen and sailors were returning back to Britain in 1919, there wasn't a lot of work, and in some of the docks areas there was anger at wages being undercut for cheaper foreign workers. There is more to the incident with Charles Wootton also. The fight broke out between black sailors and swedes, to which the black sailors had pulled out razors and knives(sailors often did carry knives or firearms) a policeman intervened but was slashed across the face, until he was fell to the ground with exhaustion. More police and a mob had arrived chasing the black sailors to their quarters where they were living. From the house shots from a revolver were fired out wounding several policemen, one shot through the neck and was in a serious condition in hospital. Charles Wootton had ran from the house were the sailors were in which the shots from one revolver had come from, at which point the mob had grabbed him and he ended up in the water, whether thrown in or fell in, its not entirely clear. This is what is reported in the newspapers at the time.
@@Dom-fx4kt truth has no place here.. Be gone with your facts
@@kimwarburton8490 there are also disadvantages of having children with foreigners.
@@kimwarburton8490 Revolting concept.
Perhaps we heard about the British soldiers because nearly one million died. And hostility to outsiders was unique to the UK? I knew someone who married a Zulu women. There was hostility in the women's family to her prospective white husband as he wasn't black and wasn't Zulu. Shame on the BBC for stirring unnecessary racial hatred.
You need to go to Africa to find African history guys come on
❌❌❌
Lies lies lies... you've been outed for your lies fella... I feel embarrassed for you 🤣😅🤣😅
These riots also deeply affected the Chinese community too. Similar disgusting stereotypes of interracial couples. They set fire to the houses of Chinese people because they had white wives in the East End London, 1919
Middle Eastern and South Asian people were targets too. Especially in Bristol.
Chinese are the most racist though particularly in interracial relationships. Its literally an ethno state lmao
Uh oh, not British ppl denying my British great grandparents existed 🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️
Where is the video on Kriss Donald BBC?
How are these total lies being allowed on the BBC?
I’m a Bermudian & I’ve never been taught this story. Thank you for presenting this Black British history ✊🏿
Because its bullshit, he shot police officers and this guy is pulling the "he dindu nuffin" card
I'm a white guy from South East England and I'm disgusted we're not taught THIS but are taught about segregation in America
You are not taught it (yet), because it is a lie. "How a dangerous myth was created by people like Reni Eddo-Lodge, David Olusoga and the BBC"
Do you think that you were taught everything at school?
Consider yourself lucky that you're not being taught these lies .. unless you're more comfortable to continue virtue signaling,then stay on that soap box
This is not history, it is a story miss told to aggravate racial tension, look up the story as reported in the newspapers of the area and time of the incident, the person who sadly drowned was being pursued for a criminal act he was suspected of wounding and killing British police officers and also of wounding a Scandinavian sailor, he was not being chased on account of his race .
Do some proper research on this, my friend. You'll find it's absolute bullshit. The BBC you might have grown up with which was respected throughout the world for its quality broadcasting is long gone. They're more than happy to peddle lies these days. As this proves.
I would like to know why it’s always about black and white? What about the discrimination of the Irish in Britain that came before, what about Italian discrimination that came before as well? What about how discrimstiin about catholics? Yeah you can’t change the colour of your skin, but you can’t also change being Irish or Italian and given the times it happened you also couldn’t just change your religion after being brought up with it amongst your family, kind of getting bored now of all this. It’s a way of learning but I don’t see how this would solve anything by bringing it all up, it’s going to cause more tension than there already is. And I don’t see why you can be frustrated and angry at something that happened over 100 years ago. I’m part Irish and I don’t feel frustration to how my ancestor were treated or the catholic ones. My Scottish great great grandfather was killed in the first war by a German over 100 years ago leaving 6 children orphaned, don’t see why I should be frustrated with Germans just cause he was basically murdered by one. A two great great uncles were also killed in the first and second war by Germans leaving families heartbroken and causing one of the mothers to die a week later cause she couldn’t take it and the other to live her days wondering what ever happened to the body of her son. It’s all in the past. People move on. What happened to Charles was a tragedy, but to hold on to it after all this time, and constantly want to talk about it and pin point how bad whites were back then can only do more damage, as if we are still being hated in for the actions people took all those years ago. And although Britain is still a racist country, it’s not as racist as it was back then
Blatant lies made up by troublemakers.
BBC😡
No one was convicted of the murder of Terry Gregory!!
Check out this channel for more details
Great injustice was common cos racism is unjustice
I was born and grew up in south east London and, I´m a white male. I clearly remember the riots in the late 80´s and also, the wise words and vision of great Mr. Enoch Powell in the late 1960´s! This video reflects on the past, and not the present! Oh, and by the way, when it comes to real slavery, black and white peoples´ enslavement, the Jews were at the forefront of this once thriving and inhuman business!
hey, can u give me a date n place so i can look into that jew-slavery link myself?
@@kimwarburton8490 Hello Kim, if that´s your real name. I have chosen only one link from which, you will eventually understand, that the official version of black slavery, is as false and untrue, as the official version of WWll! Enjoy, or perhaps, no!
th-cam.com/video/51EZ0vLxWK8/w-d-xo.html
I keep telling people Britain only stopped lynching people three years before America did. Interestingly, the last person lynched was white.
The numbers though are massively different.
@@mcr2356 There were very few on either side of the Atlantic, only dozens in the entire 19th and 20th century. "Massively" different, seeing as how few there were in the United States must mean the UK had MORE.
There were only 2,107 lynchings in the United States going back two hundred years before the United States existed and only sixteen from now back to the end of the 19th century (122 years ago) and only TWO in the 20th century. Over 80% of those were when the United States was a colony of a certain world power.
But you say it was massively different in Britain. If it was "massively different", seeing as I know the numbers in the United States were so incredibly low that must mean you Brits lynched a whole lot of people, huh? Because there is no way to go DOWN from the vast number of "two", so you must mean they were MORE violent, right?
Or were you just talking out of your ass about a subject you know nothing about?
See, I think it's a subject you know nothing about, but WANT to be thought of as knowing about. You *want* to be better than those yanks, but those gosh darned facts are in the way. Huh.
@ Your figures are massively wrong, you know it. It's not a dick measuring contest. Britain didn't have a big history of lynching in the 18th to the 20th century, dosnt make the country better.
"Alt history"
Like Trump huh
This is not in anyway intended to be negative. I am a white English female and just want to know two things...firstly, there was little known about different ethnic issues a hundred years ago so don’t you think we have progressed from then? And if this was an all cast of white people complaining about ethnic issues that they have suffered wouldn’t that be a big no no and it would be called a racist programme?
There are always two sides...just saying.
Here come your white tears, what sort of “ethnic” issues have white people faced in this country at the hands of minorities?! This video is just detailing a violent racial attack and murder of an innocent black man that occurred in the UK. His story was never told so that’s why they’ve made a video explaining what had
happened. In this very case there are no two sides as he was in fact murdered in a racial attack. Stop coming under videos that are teaching us about the lost history of the many struggles black people had to face at the hands of your ancestors.
Sweet Dreams Have progressed..no, there are not so many out and out murders anymore racism is just a lot more sophisticated now, and in many ways much more insidious. Here is a perfect example th-cam.com/video/1x0G4NCBTzg/w-d-xo.html
Please tell me you are all black Americans? Because in England I do not see the struggles America has. And if so, why is it so nasty for you? Make me understand. All my black friends don’t seem to take issue with it or is it because I am in the U.K.?
@@yareyaredaze9656 hey, I live right down south 60 miles from London, my neighbors are from The Gambia and there is no issues at all, in fact they are one of the friendliest families in the close. But no offence to my northern citizens they have more issues, they call us ‘southern softies’ and bowl it around thinking they are well hard lol but it’s more poverty up north so maybe that’s a factor? Btw thanks for replying, I see America in a sad state and like they are living 50yrs ago...
@@daniscottxo There is more to this story that what was said. Several police officers were shot and injured from a single revolver coming from the house the sailors were in, Charles Wootton had ran from the house, in which the angry mob saw him as guilty as coming from the house, I'm not saying he was the one the fired the shots, but there is more to this story than what this vid is claiming. The fight with the Swedes that started it all escalated when the Black sailors drew razors in the altercation, to which a police officer intervening had his face slashed up. To which a mob and several police chased this group back to the house they were staying at, which then resulted in the shooting of the revolver.
I didn’t learn anything at school about the war my father had fought in much less the First World War that my grandfather fought in.
How did you attended school and not attend any history lessons ?
@@nobby91010 Did I say that ? I’m afraid that you’ve made an assumption.
We had history lessons but it just wasn’t on the curriculum.
So what ,the curriculum at schools does not revolve around you.
Here’s the real story th-cam.com/video/srY_1kPCcLY/w-d-xo.html
Again another race baiting dishonesty. The reason why police officer wanted rest black sailor is that black sailor had knocked one police officer down and police went to arrest him. The black sailors went to their quarters and locked themselves inside. People gathers around and one black sailor started to shoot at the police and 2 were hit. This of course caused more excitement among crowd and when one black sailor tried to flee. They though he was shooter. They chased him and he fell into the docks and drowned cause he couldn't swim. Calling this a race riot is a lie. It was drunken brawl between Scandinavian and black sailors that went out of control.
Some cursory research of this sailor reveals that him and the other sailors shot an wounded police before the mob put an end to it
I don't think BBC knows what alt history means
I never heard this. I was born there I live in USA now. I’m 57.
Because it never happened. They neglected to mention that the fella who drowned was being chased because he and his acquaintances had just attacked and killed three policemen and he was the main suspect and tried to flee.
Because it never happened. He's a liar.
Wootton shot 2 policemen, one in the head?
11 were charged with attempted murder for slashing and stabbing the policeman who tried to break up the fight at the pub?
he doesn't cite a source for this or "throwing rocks at him"? Because it's a fabrication!
Its sad that people are gullible enough to go along with this obvious lies and nonsense thankfully most people see through it
I'm a white man, this part of British history was never taught to us. Personally I don't see different races, I see a fellow human being. Like all races including whites, there are good and bad, respect me and I will respect you.
White racism is not an individual thing and white wemen are at the forefront of this all.
Look up the truth and don't just virtue signal . This dude is lying.. kinda like you are about not seeing differences in races
If there is no difference in the races and we can all get along, why do they not want to learn British history, as was stated at the start of the video? They're British, right? But they don't want to learn about historical British people. That makes no sense.
Possibly the reason you weren’t taught it was because it didn’t happen. This video was a biased, one sided incomplete reporting designed to initiate racial tension - pure BBC.
Remember this is a BBC video. I'm attaching a counter argument that needs airing. If it is true the BBC have something to answer for. th-cam.com/video/srY_1kPCcLY/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=HistoryDebunked
Youre in a white country like britain should
Simply a biased black view of their history!!
A pack of lies!!!
This is bollocks
You're looked at suspicious because most of you ARE suspect
shut up
😂
Wow dude. get a life.
Nina Bina please elaborate, put forward a well reasoned argument to support your claim....
Fake news
Absolute fabrication! This reminds me of what falls out of the south end of a bull.
I call BULLSHIT
Nice collection of experts and historians btw! I'm from Cardiff and we've always been proud of our multiracial city! So enough of this horseshit ... Cardiff aint Louisiana!! ffs!
I didnt know that they lynched in the uk
I think he was using the word lynched to try and draw a comparison between the USA and the UK. The man who died drowned after the mob pushed him in the water and threw stones at him. He was murdered and they did not find or prosecute the perpetrators. It is not what happened in the USA in action, scale or timeframe. In the USA 3,500 African Americans and 1,300 white Anericans were lynched between 1882 and 1968. In the 1919 UK riots there were two murders of BAME and three murders of white people, and it wasnt on the scale of the USA 1919 riots (Red Summer ) en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Summer
There is quite a lot of information online about the UK riots. Wives and girlfriends were treated badly, children grew up without their fathers who were repatriated to their home countries, men separated from their families. Whole communities felt considerable fear for some time due to the rioters. It was really terrible. I havent read all of this, but I think it's a comprehensive look at what was happening www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/6874/D086172.pdf%3Fsequence%3D1%26isAllowed%3Dy&ved=2ahUKEwiqsaf4uufqAhUYSBUIHahxBb0QFjAJegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw1UExr2ux3PN5g7mcjjI-cm
They didn’t, although we still were legally using hanging as a method of execution, up until 1964 if memory serves. Don’t get me wrong, racial tension in London in 1919 was documented as being a serious problem, but i think some people are getting confused between American and British history by the use of this term. Lynching was certainly not a common practice in the UK as it was in the states.
You are only being told part of Charles Wooton. You are being led by the nose - conned....
There was no lynching.
This was no lynching, he was being chased because police wanted him for the murder of a police officer and slashing some Scandinavian sailors.
Charles Wooten was part of a black group/ gang of men that had an argument with Scandinavian sailors. Woo trim himself a sailor. Unfortunately the woke “ black people are innocent of everything “ approach here is lies. Woo trim and others attacked Scandinavians and when the politeness up they shot 2 police officers… Because of this a gang with police surrounding a house , Wootton tried to make his escape and ran towards the river where he fell in or was pushed in, there is no evidence to support what happened. It is reported he was hit with a stone and drowned. He along with the black gangs had knives and guns which were used violently towards whites and police. Charles Wootton had a college/ training building in upper Parliament street named after him. For an explanation see History debunked on TH-cam. David Olusoga’s book also twists this story to appeal to a black racist agenda. Like the fraudulent Black Lives Matter in the US people are sick to death with the notion that everything is racist. Whilst the 18 th Century Slavs trade was abhorrent it wasn’t the worst event in history, it wasn’t even the worst slavery event, the Muslin people enslaved people and treated them more severely but we don’t hear much about that. Neither do we hear of the black African leaders who sold their own people. Today Haiti is controlled by slavery but we don’t hear black people condemning that. Nor do we hear them condemning the Romans for enslaving the white British. It’s time black people got over slavery that hasn’t affected them for hundreds of years and tried to get on with life without playing the race card .
Complete pack of lies. Glad I don't fund this anymore. Never get a penny out of me.
Lies lies lies
Read a book rather than listening to this nonsense
Lies
All propaganda lies
Look up Tomas sowell.
In America something similar happened look up the Elaine Massacre
Tulsa race riot 1920
Red summer 1919
Jesse Washington Lynching
Marion Lynching
Atlanta race riot 1905.
Nothing similar in the USA happened because this didn’t happen in the first place.
This is a lie. First, the fight they mentioned broke out the previous night with a gang of Scandinavian sailors. Wootton was in a mob of black sailors who returned to the pub the following night for revenge with knives and straight razors and stabbed up the Scandinavians, as well as attempting to slash the throat of a passing police officer who tried to stop them. The cops showed up in numbers and arrested them for a series of stabbings, not just for being black in a street fight. Second, after they returned to their boarding house, Wootton fired a pistol at the cops, wounded two officers (one of them in the throat) and fled with a hue-and-cry behind him. After this, he either fell, jumped or was pushed into the dock. Myself, I doubt anyone in the crowd would've been in a hurry to approach an armed man.
TL, DR; Wootton wasn't whistling down the street minding his own business when he was set upon by an angry mob, he was fleeing the cops as one of a number of men wanted for several attempted murders.
Love the video
Please look up Black Wall Street as well
Then look up the Bantu expansion and the Mfecane for more history of black oppression.
@@villein2907 Indeed the Bantu ps were a terror. Ask the Khoisan.
lmao 😆😅🤣😂
Nobody cares
@Jaime Brown 😘😘😘😘
The BBC doesn't care that this account is a pack of lies intended to stoke up anti-white hate.
The BBC and the lying Olugosa obviously have so many examples of racism to choose from that they have to completely falsify the one they chose. How weird is that!
BBC fairy stories
Been circulating this incredible #AltHistory series by #BBCStories since the summer!! Stunning stories and its utterly shameful that #BlackBritishStories erase us#WhiteWashing #BlackHistory #BritishHistory #BlackSoldiers #BlackRegiment #ForgottenRegiment #BlackBritishMen
you've been played on this one, I'm afraid
You should share the History Debunked channel. He just uploaded a video telling the truth of the story the BBC used here.
@@shaunpatrick8345 When you se this HD vid you HAVE to ask What are the BBC doing here? th-cam.com/users/results?search_query=history+debunked