ncees pe hb 1.1, p. 152-154. but this reference doesnt include the density, mass, w, and V equation presented here. therefore, this example needs to be tweaked to accommodate the new cbt reference format. still good practice.
ncees pe hb 1.1, p. 152-154. but this reference doesnt include the density, mass, w, and V equation presented here. therefore, this example needs to be tweaked to accommodate the new cbt reference format. still good practice.
CBT Ref Man Pg. 154, Sect 3.9.2, gamma d- Pg. 139-140, Sect 3.8.3
Thanks for listing these!
ncees pe hb 1.1, p. 152-154.
but this reference doesnt include the density, mass, w, and V equation presented here. therefore, this example needs to be tweaked to accommodate the new cbt reference format.
still good practice.
The table incorrectly states mass as lbm/ft^3, which is density. It should just say lbm.
agree.
Why you used dry mass in order to calculate dry density in situ while the equation of dry density equals mass of solids divided by total volume
ncees pe hb 1.1, p. 152-154.
but this reference doesnt include the density, mass, w, and V equation presented here. therefore, this example needs to be tweaked to accommodate the new cbt reference format.
still good practice.
The density equation is basically the same as the dry unit weight equation on p. 141: Wt/(V*(1+w))=dry unit wt
new videos has too small question text