Using fluorescent light to find evidence

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 42

  • @tiendaforense
    @tiendaforense 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is by far the best channel on forensic education out there!, congratulations Mike, another beautiful video...

    • @profmccutch
      @profmccutch  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don’t know why I didn’t see this months ago. Thank you so much.

  • @brandonbeach6076
    @brandonbeach6076 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Mike,
    How would you lift those prints from each of those surfaces? For example, off of the textured siding and wood? Would Mikrosil or Durocast work the best since they can fill in the entire surface?

    • @profmccutch
      @profmccutch  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      brandon beach I would use the diff-lift tape or black gel lifters. They work awesome. I have another video showing how to lift off of textured surfaces. I use those items.

    • @brandonbeach6076
      @brandonbeach6076 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome, thanks.

  • @richardgray131185
    @richardgray131185 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Mike,
    Which light frequency is best for detecting fingerprints on photographs?
    Thank you.

  • @verltasium
    @verltasium 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which UV light was used: 365nm or 395nm?

  • @seancampbell6738
    @seancampbell6738 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Mike, I'm using a Lumatec Superlite M 05. Can I just ask about torch techniques. Do you always shine the light source at an angle to your target or do you ever find shining you light straight on helpful? I know white light can give a lot of glare back but do you find the same with UV or Blue? thanks

    • @profmccutch
      @profmccutch  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sean Campbell If I am not looking for foot impressions I will shine the light at many angles to find the best print. Most of the time I find the angles work best. For footwear, I always use oblique/side lighting.

  • @gonzalonestorflorescevallo6949
    @gonzalonestorflorescevallo6949 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    And to lift the fingerprint you use a regular tape or what method you use?

  • @Twisted666Freak
    @Twisted666Freak 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Mike,
    So you lift the print after putting fluroscent powder, and analyse it again using UV back in a lab ? Like can you (or do you) use techniques like super glue fumming or something so the print is visible to the naked eye after you have applied the powder ?
    I just want to know if you want to show the print to the court, do we click a high resolution photograph of the print under Blue light ? This will be admissible right ?
    Also is powder a better way to go about than other things like iodine crystals and fuming ?
    Like lets say i find a can on a crime scene, i dont have to use powder on it right there,i can pack it and use those techniques in the lab ?

    • @profmccutch
      @profmccutch  9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Rahim,
      Thanks for the comment. The use of light will vary depending on the type of evidence that you are examining. If you are just dusting for fingerprints then I would fume it first for sure. Then I would use the fluorescent powder. If you are examining the object at a lab, you may want to use a dye before the dusting, but still fume first. If you choose to use the fluorescent powder to develop the print, you can still lift it with tape or hinge lifter. The print can be shown in court if necessary and a 1:1 photograph can be taken of the print as well. I hope this helps. If you want to chat more you can send me an email through my website www.forensiceducation.net and we can talk further. I hope this helps! Thanks for watching.

  • @alexanderj4545
    @alexanderj4545 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice instructive video. Do you know what ´type´ the orange/amber filter is?

    • @profmccutch
      @profmccutch  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For filming purposes I used an orange shield to cover the camera. I usually use goggles or I have just square orange plastic shields.

    • @alexanderj4545
      @alexanderj4545 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@profmccutch Thanks for your response. Are these just any orange goggles or something like from lynnpeavey? Greetings from Iceland.

  • @tatianavitanova2509
    @tatianavitanova2509 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Mike, what determines what color fluorescent powder to be used..?

    • @profmccutch
      @profmccutch  10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Whatever color gives you the best contrast. I like the green. As long as it is a high quality powder, any color should do.

  • @ondskanbolton28
    @ondskanbolton28 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Mike, what's the wavelenght for observe Gunshot Residues?

    • @profmccutch
      @profmccutch  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ondskan Bolton try 450-522 with orange or yellow filter. If that doesn't work try UV 370-390 and use same filters. Let me know if it works.

  • @anatoliyanatoliy9315
    @anatoliyanatoliy9315 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    что за фонарь.где купить?

  • @julianwilliams9088
    @julianwilliams9088 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What model Battle Light do you use?

    • @profmccutch
      @profmccutch  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Julian Williams if you buy it from LynnPeavey.com it is just called Battle lite. You can change the tips for the color you want I.e. UV, blue, green, etc.

    • @julianwilliams9088
      @julianwilliams9088 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@profmccutch thank you

  • @JoFrieFam
    @JoFrieFam 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Mike, could you give me some more informations (manufacturer) about the light with the diffrent Heads and the Dimmer?

    • @profmccutch
      @profmccutch  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jörg Frie check out www.lynnpeavy.com. Put "battle light" in the search. That is the light I use. It is a great light. Very durable and I mostly use the flashlight, UV and Blue heads. Thanks for watching.

  • @sakura-chan6460
    @sakura-chan6460 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankyou

  • @siyonasingh5421
    @siyonasingh5421 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankyou !!!

  • @RationallySkeptical
    @RationallySkeptical 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have tested this myself and UV light will not illuminate semen without the proper eyewear filter. I have no idea why you're saying only blue light needs the orange goggles. UV does also. Not for bone fragments or other near-white items that will naturally fluoresce, but semen and urine definitely will not light up without any eyewear.

    • @profmccutch
      @profmccutch  8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      RationallySkeptical I have been doing this for years and never wear googles for UV light. I am not sure why it wouldn't work for you. It is like using a black light. The black light bulb illuminates light colored objects without any filtered googles. The googles are actually filtering out parts of the light. With UV, there is no need to wear the googles. I have used UV to find urine and semen numerous times. Just like the sample card I use. No tricks, just science.
      Thanks for watching.

    • @profmccutch
      @profmccutch  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      RationallySkeptical Check out at 6:20 mark when I illuminate the sample sheet. It is semen in the middle and urine on the right

    • @jesusrivera4300
      @jesusrivera4300 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@profmccutch does semen come up a brighter more fluoresce color?

    • @profmccutch
      @profmccutch  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jesus.rivera43 Rivera not really. It depends on him much sample is left behind and how strong the light is.

  • @SebastianMann222
    @SebastianMann222 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    cool

  • @profmccutch
    @profmccutch  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    My latest video

  • @johnmatsson4254
    @johnmatsson4254 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please sir, blow your nose before doing infomercials. Very distracting