Steve Fezzik: Why Correlations Should Be Your Parlay Betting Strategy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 7

  • @archvaldor
    @archvaldor 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    INSANE parlays I have got away with:
    Over/Under In Quarter/Half-time/Match
    Team To Win Tournament/Final Match
    0-0 Correct Score/Draw/Under 2.5 Goals/No First Goalscorer
    My biggest one was a Formula 1 race where I got bets on the driver to win, the same driver to finish in the top 5, the same driver to finish in the top 10, the drivers team, the tyre manufacturer they were using and the German nationality to win the race-all of these bets were 100% correlated-1500-1 on an event with an evens probability.

    • @L33TTechReviewer
      @L33TTechReviewer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What book let you place this? No way I could on my books they don't even let you do things like player to score and team to have 1+ goals because of the correlation

  • @ddbrotherscontractors
    @ddbrotherscontractors 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    There's alot of bashing of fezzik, sometimes in the comments,a ton on Twitter. Sometimes it's just a person's personality,maybe this is the case with Steve.But me I don't get it,the guy only gives realistic advice.But mainly unlike so many others,he actually bets.The spill about not chasing great advice!!

  • @seasonsintheson
    @seasonsintheson 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good stuff!

  • @G-ZUZ_IZ_KING
    @G-ZUZ_IZ_KING 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ty fellas

  • @chadmoodybto4620
    @chadmoodybto4620 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tiger Woods wasn't merely even money, he was actually -120 to win the 2007 Masters. He finished 2nd.

  • @tommyfu9271
    @tommyfu9271 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Evil Pie is DISGUSTING