Chigorin dude was indeed incredibly strong, as the majority of his moves are preferred by today's strongest chess engine. So, WOW! Amazing play by Chigorin, and easy-to-follow, excellent explanation and analysis by Chess Wisdom!
No because he says: finding combinations + in every position finding the move that leads most quickly to the fulfillment of your plan. With the emphasis on your plan. Many people will find the best move in the position but that's only 1 move, it's different to think of your own plans and being efficient at quickly achieving them like Morphy. The best move could be very basic principle or positional but his plan is always checkmate so it leads to different moves, but in the end he is finding the best combinations and moves every single time efficiently to achieve his objective. I personally noticed a big change when I started only thinking about how can I eventually checkmate rather than just playing basic positional moves.
I’ve long been a fan of the creative Chigorin. Like Alekhine later, he had such a deep understanding of attacking potential which he built from his powerful positional play, with his unique desire of insisting on having a knight vs bishop middle game (which backfired against the likes of Lasker when they met in 1899 as Lasker crushed him with the bishop pair; other times, though, he managed to maintain strong pressure with the knight). He died only 3 years after this game and was in his early 50s but he was still a very strong player at the time. While Teichmann made his large errors (castling to “un”-safety and allowing enemy queen infiltration), the fact that a young, healthy master could lose with as White to an opening that insisted on offering the bishop pair, blocked the c pawn so quickly, and left a hole on e5 is quite spectacular. Chigorin crushed Pillsbury at the peak of his career with this same opening. While it is possible that Pillsbury got sick during the tournament (St. Petersburg 1895/96) and didn’t play his best, it still shows the years of practice he had with it prior to this Teichmann game as well as the fact that it wasn’t easy even for a weakened Pillsbury to handle the tricky opening. Thanks as always
@@chesswisdom Very good. I don’t think I’ve seen it covered very many times. And the few times it was, the depth was not so great. So it would be good seeing it here. Hope all has been well, Sir. Good luck and good day
Great game from the classics. I think the king had to go to b2, like the computer said, and it finds safety on a1 where white's bishops are strong defenders.
I think there are more refined versions of the principle of "the advantage of two bishops." For instance a bishop and a strong centralized knight in a congested center sounds like an exception. To me, chess is all about the exceptions.
Bro, these things doesn't work in games, because there is very low probability that your opponent will those moves as you have mentioned in the game,,,, maybe 1 out of 20 games😂😂 or 1 out of 50 games 😂😂😂😂🥳
Well, watching just the two moves of the first game ... 1. d4 d5 2 c4 I think you will have ample opportunity to play 2 ... Nc6. But to be honest, most combinations only get used once in a while in the actual game. However, they are constantly there in the moves you think about making and avoid. Notice how many combinations were there in variations that were not actually played. If you are not aware of the common combinations, you will run into them quite often actually because you will find them happening to you quite often. High level players are aware of the possibilities and will happily educate you in basic combinations. The exact moves do not matter, but the recurring combinative patterns matter.
The point is that you need to learn how to create combinations. Alekhine was said to be able to seemingly pull them out of thin air. Much of the skill in chess is knowing how to categorize and evaluate game states and how they will continue.
You need to be on a certain level to understand why this is unusual. Obviously you are far from that. You don't need to comment just because you can. Sometimes is better to remain silent.
Brilliant game and love the way Chess Wisdom analyses the thought process behind every move. Subscribed!
If "the skill of making combinations" is a principle, I have a more effective principle: "the skill of winning".
Chigorin dude was indeed incredibly strong, as the majority of his moves are preferred by today's strongest chess engine. So, WOW! Amazing play by Chigorin, and easy-to-follow, excellent explanation and analysis by Chess Wisdom!
Sorry, but that is not true. The Most moves are not the engine top choice
Only the winning attacking sequence was perfectly played.
One of the best chess channel... Beauty of the classic chess remain one of the most way to learn about real exceptional minds of grand masters.
Children: Please try this @ home. For we mere mortals...@ Ur own peril(joking).
This principle sounds a lot like "just play the best move bro"
No because he says: finding combinations + in every position finding the move that leads most quickly to the fulfillment of your plan. With the emphasis on your plan. Many people will find the best move in the position but that's only 1 move, it's different to think of your own plans and being efficient at quickly achieving them like Morphy. The best move could be very basic principle or positional but his plan is always checkmate so it leads to different moves, but in the end he is finding the best combinations and moves every single time efficiently to achieve his objective. I personally noticed a big change when I started only thinking about how can I eventually checkmate rather than just playing basic positional moves.
Chess in a sense is THAT simple.
I’ve long been a fan of the creative Chigorin. Like Alekhine later, he had such a deep understanding of attacking potential which he built from his powerful positional play, with his unique desire of insisting on having a knight vs bishop middle game (which backfired against the likes of Lasker when they met in 1899 as Lasker crushed him with the bishop pair; other times, though, he managed to maintain strong pressure with the knight). He died only 3 years after this game and was in his early 50s but he was still a very strong player at the time. While Teichmann made his large errors (castling to “un”-safety and allowing enemy queen infiltration), the fact that a young, healthy master could lose with as White to an opening that insisted on offering the bishop pair, blocked the c pawn so quickly, and left a hole on e5 is quite spectacular. Chigorin crushed Pillsbury at the peak of his career with this same opening. While it is possible that Pillsbury got sick during the tournament (St. Petersburg 1895/96) and didn’t play his best, it still shows the years of practice he had with it prior to this Teichmann game as well as the fact that it wasn’t easy even for a weakened Pillsbury to handle the tricky opening.
Thanks as always
Thank you. I'm planning to make a video on that game against Pillsbury too.
@@chesswisdom
Very good. I don’t think I’ve seen it covered very many times. And the few times it was, the depth was not so great. So it would be good seeing it here.
Hope all has been well, Sir.
Good luck and good day
A beautiful game brilliantly analysed
Your explanation ! So simple , so instructive , Thanks alot sir .
My pleasure, sir!
Muy buena partida y excelente analisis, gracias chess wisdom, saludos
My pleasure.
A very nice game from black 's point of view ❤, thanks.
My pleasure.
Thank you for the excellent explanation
My pleasure.
watched this again ... as good the second time around
Beautiful game Chigorin is a great strategist has the ability to simplify his attack
Very good explanation you got a new follower
Great game from the classics. I think the king had to go to b2, like the computer said, and it finds safety on a1 where white's bishops are strong defenders.
A view I can't revisit. Thnx tho.
superb game!
Very instructive.
Nc6 - he's on acid
I shouted when he played Nc3. Amazing.
Thank you for your analysis. I loved it.
My pleasure.
Beautiful game!
Brilliant!!!
Wonderful especially it's in black
I watched this video and now have increased my lichess elo by 2000.
That is an incredible game
I think there are more refined versions of the principle of "the advantage of two bishops." For instance a bishop and a strong centralized knight in a congested center sounds like an exception. To me, chess is all about the exceptions.
16:41 Kd3, *Qb3+*
What is the principle mentioned in the title?
He preferd knights over Bishops in his games most teachers teach the opposit
4:55 after black ND5, why not NxD5? If black take then Qxb4?
It's illegal, as the white knight is pinned.
@@chesswisdom Ah yes I'm blind lol
Thanks
@@czer096 My pleasure.
how do you have only 13 thousands subscribers
He had his own engine in head😂
That’s pretty impressive, but I would have chosen the worst moves for both pieces every time.
The sigma wolf likes it
Be honoured
Awoooooooo🐺
Chigorin noodles ;):)
Bro, these things doesn't work in games, because there is very low probability that your opponent will those moves as you have mentioned in the game,,,, maybe 1 out of 20 games😂😂 or 1 out of 50 games 😂😂😂😂🥳
Well, watching just the two moves of the first game ... 1. d4 d5 2 c4 I think you will have ample opportunity to play 2 ... Nc6. But to be honest, most combinations only get used once in a while in the actual game. However, they are constantly there in the moves you think about making and avoid. Notice how many combinations were there in variations that were not actually played. If you are not aware of the common combinations, you will run into them quite often actually because you will find them happening to you quite often. High level players are aware of the possibilities and will happily educate you in basic combinations. The exact moves do not matter, but the recurring combinative patterns matter.
The point is that you need to learn how to create combinations. Alekhine was said to be able to seemingly pull them out of thin air. Much of the skill in chess is knowing how to categorize and evaluate game states and how they will continue.
❤🔥 Very nice, Thank you.
My pleasure.
…as with so many 19th century masters - it’s all in the beard…
Second view 😅.
First views
Not true. I viewed it first, you commented first
I do not see anything unusual about this game it's like any other chess game he's moving the black pieces like anybody else would move to Black pieces
You need to be on a certain level to understand why this is unusual. Obviously you are far from that. You don't need to comment just because you can. Sometimes is better to remain silent.
Hey CHESS WISDOM ! What is your name? Why do you hide your name? Are you ashamed of your name or of your Elo rating??
The skill and memory needed to be a grandmaster is inspiring.
Damn......Surgical.
Best. Move Checkmate