Real Lawyer Reacts to Idiocracy (The Movie)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2020
  • ⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! legaleagle.link/eagleteam ⚖️
    This is fiction, right? Not a documentary?
    Get CuriosityStream AND Nebula for 26% off! (includes bloopers and the extended cut) curiositystream.com/legaleagle
    ⚖️⚖️⚖️Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my PRELAW COURSE:
    legaleagle.teachable.com/p/pr...
    ©©©©© Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you (15% OFF!):
    www.copyrightcourse.com/yt
    ★ A Few of My Favorite Things★
    🕵️♂️My Custom Suits: legaleagle.link/indochino
    👔My Ties: fave.co/2ImLY9I
    📎My Tie Clips/Bars: amzn.to/2WIQ6EE
    🔲My Pocket Squares: amzn.to/2UfsKtL
    💈My Hair Product amzn.to/2Ui2aQx
    📸My Video Camera Setup www.amazon.com/shop/legaleagle
    New episodes weekly! Subscribe here:
    th-cam.com/users/legaleagle?su...
    ★More series on LegalEagle★
    Real Lawyer Reacts: goo.gl/hw9vcE
    Laws Broken: goo.gl/PJw3vK
    Law 101: goo.gl/rrzFw3
    Real Law Review: goo.gl/NHUoqc
    I get asked a lot about whether being a practicing attorney is like being a lawyer on TV. I love watching legal movies and courtroom dramas. It's one of the reasons I decided to become a lawyer. But sometimes they make me want to pull my hair out because they are ridiculous. Today I'm taking a break from representing clients and teaching law students how to kick ass in law school to take on lawyers in the movies and on TV. While all legal movies and shows take dramatic license to make things more interesting (nobody wants to see hundreds of hours of brief writing), many of them have a grain of truth. This is part of a continuing series of "Lawyer Reaction" videos. Got a legal movie or TV show you'd like me to critique? Let me know in the comments!
    Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos! All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
    ========================================================
    ★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ ➜ / legaleagledj
    ★ More vids on Facebook: ➜ / legaleaglereacts
    ★ Stella’s Insta ➜ / stellathelegalbeagle
    ★ For promotional inquiries please reach out here: legaleagle@standard.tv

ความคิดเห็น • 8K

  • @LegalEagle
    @LegalEagle  3 ปีที่แล้ว +456

    👮‍♂️What should I cover next?
    🚀Get CuriosityStream/Nebula to watch the EXTENDED CUT and BLOOPERS: curiositystream.com/legal

    • @Larry-rk1op
      @Larry-rk1op 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      The trial of tim heidecker is a good one

    • @SidneyHurcombe
      @SidneyHurcombe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      The trial of the chicago 7
      A few good men
      Primal Fear

    • @ciaranwhitehead3906
      @ciaranwhitehead3906 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      The Trial of the Chicago 7 definitely

    • @BigPoppaT10
      @BigPoppaT10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I’m telling you you should totally review Fracture staring Anthony Hopkins and Ryan gosling. Hopkins represents himself in court and tries to manipulate the system and gosling is an upcoming lawyer in LA it’s got some fun moments that I think you would enjoy.

    • @adam87971
      @adam87971 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Another +1 for Trial of the Chicago 7, I'd love to see your take on it.

  • @Nulono
    @Nulono 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9594

    Objection: President Camacho finds a smart person to fix a problem plaguing the nation, and follows his advice. This movie is not realistic.

    • @dysn3961
      @dysn3961 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1248

      "Don't vote for my opponent because he listens to scientists" is something I thought I would only hear in a parody

    • @stlkngyomom
      @stlkngyomom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +220

      Objection! Evidence submitted:
      Chris Hedges once said(around 2008,while promoting his book,Empire of Illusion:The End of Literacy and Rise of The Spectacle):
      "Americans are the most illusioned nation on the planet. "
      Ergo(Florida man & woman taken into consideration)"The Idiiocracy"could be declared a documentary and not a"work of fiction'.

    • @Dong_Harvey
      @Dong_Harvey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +82

      @@dysn3961 that just means Trump wants to copyright all possible parody of Trump as no historical documentary of his administration can be called a satire..
      I didn't mean to make any sense of this, but it might turn out to be true

    • @Abyssinian121
      @Abyssinian121 3 ปีที่แล้ว +183

      It used to be realistic... long ago, in the Before Times. These days? We'd be lucky to upgrade to Camacho. Gah.

    • @SquishyFletcher
      @SquishyFletcher 3 ปีที่แล้ว +133

      I personally believe that Idiocracy is a Romanticized future Historical Documentary, depicting a less than truthful situation (Poetic license), when a President is smart/humble enough to listen to someone who is clearly smarter than them-self, on matters of scientific import.

  • @harryjennings5602
    @harryjennings5602 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1062

    Yo, don't diss on President Camacho.
    He saw the country in trouble and he reached out to the most qualified person he could find to help. AND when he recognized he made a mistake sending him to rehabilitation, he reversed course.
    Oh, that we had leadership with the integrity and humility of Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho.

    • @Strider91
      @Strider91 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Amen

    • @jonathanstmartin
      @jonathanstmartin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      Comancho 2020

    • @TheWifeRottenRomance
      @TheWifeRottenRomance 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      For real! I was so pissed at his commentary.

    • @robmd887
      @robmd887 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Camacho is best girl

    • @sycho-tech5104
      @sycho-tech5104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Lol it’s funny cuz it’s true!
      At any rate president Camacho in the movie a better president than the last 4 we’ve had in real life... and I Doubt anything going to get better.

  • @jeremyc6054
    @jeremyc6054 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +210

    The only glaring error I can see in this movie is that they thought it would take 500 years to get to that point...

    • @Freakazoid12345
      @Freakazoid12345 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Mike Judge says he's no profit because he was off by hundreds of years.

  • @matthewdennis5782
    @matthewdennis5782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +513

    “For 2006 unrealistic, for 2020 I give it an A+” best line of the episode.

    • @mynameismaxdowis
      @mynameismaxdowis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      For 2022 I give it a reason to report this comment ;(

    • @Intranetusa
      @Intranetusa 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      It became realistic back in 2016. 2020 just adds to it.

    • @mr.dr.kaiser4912
      @mr.dr.kaiser4912 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@IntranetusaTry 2008.

    • @Intranetusa
      @Intranetusa 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​ @mr.dr.kaiser4912 - Nah. Obama and Bush were both riding on the populist bandwagon but neither of them were complete jokers. Both Obama and Bush knew how to act respectably.

    • @mr.dr.kaiser4912
      @mr.dr.kaiser4912 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Intranetusa Ah, yes, quite respectable war crimes and abuse of executive orders, how could I forget.

  • @robmd887
    @robmd887 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5480

    I love this movie... it has electrolytes

    • @CobaltCruiser
      @CobaltCruiser 3 ปีที่แล้ว +257

      Electrolytes: It's what plants crave

    • @whorebagsss
      @whorebagsss 3 ปีที่แล้ว +129

      Ha. Ha. Ha. You said... you said the thing!
      Man, we're living this movie.

    • @katanafourzeronine
      @katanafourzeronine 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      what are electrolytes though?

    • @mrcritical6751
      @mrcritical6751 3 ปีที่แล้ว +103

      @@katanafourzeronine it’s what Brawdo is made out of

    • @zyansheep
      @zyansheep 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@katanafourzeronine salt

  • @Rational_Driver
    @Rational_Driver 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3729

    "This movie is COMPLETELY unrealistic...for 2006. For 2020, I give it an A+."
    So true.

    • @xtpsxreportsx
      @xtpsxreportsx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      Sigh

    • @stefangrobbink7760
      @stefangrobbink7760 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Ouch.

    • @corvusdove874
      @corvusdove874 3 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      And if Mike Judge had cracked out a sequel somehow, I am sure in his prophetic awesomeness it would have been about a disease ravaging the populace.

    • @LordButtersI
      @LordButtersI 3 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      It is staggering how quickly the US went to absolute shit.

    • @xtpsxreportsx
      @xtpsxreportsx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@LordButtersI seems its downfall has had more momentum than most would give it credit for

  • @travisgessler6283
    @travisgessler6283 2 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    Love how this lawyer thought this was a comedy, till he got about half way through and realized it was a documentary

  • @bertbaker7067
    @bertbaker7067 ปีที่แล้ว +247

    @~6:25 , I totally agree. Having corporate sponsorship of the criminal justice system is nuts. Could you imagine the conflicts of interest if, for instance, a prison was a for profit business? Thank God we don't have to worry about that. *cough* cash for kids *cough*

    • @Jthanson88
      @Jthanson88 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Or if the legal system was unjustly used to prosecute a political opponent

    • @Zoroaster4
      @Zoroaster4 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@Jthanson88You think the laws shouldn't apply to former presidents?

    • @JB-pu8ik
      @JB-pu8ik 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@Zoroaster4he said "unjustly" so he must not mean President Document-Thief

    • @JasonZakrajsek
      @JasonZakrajsek 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Jthanson88yeah that would be bad. Good thing that’s not what actually happening.

  • @luisnunez3606
    @luisnunez3606 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2282

    Every time he said "that would never happen" you can see his soul get crushed little by little.

    • @Jordan-Ramses
      @Jordan-Ramses 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      Our actual legal system is worse.

    • @joeystokes1921
      @joeystokes1921 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Well, no s....t, My supervisor said the movie is representing real life.

    • @avinashtyagi2
      @avinashtyagi2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Idiocracy is today, just much less humorous

    • @louisjutras1
      @louisjutras1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      You can feel the pain and disappointment!!! 😂

    • @MostlyPennyCat
      @MostlyPennyCat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Good News!
      It's only America that's like this.

  • @lucadivine3862
    @lucadivine3862 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1020

    2006: laughing because it's ridiculous...
    2020: laughing because it hurts.

    • @StrategicGamesEtc
      @StrategicGamesEtc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      "We laugh because it hurts too much not to." --- Stranger in a Strange Land by Heinlein

    • @hunterashwill5766
      @hunterashwill5766 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Unfortunately true

    • @vHindenburg
      @vHindenburg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Rewatching this movie every few years... Yes it hurts.

    • @douglaswinters9695
      @douglaswinters9695 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      US govt apparently took this movie as a how to guide

    • @robertabarnhart6240
      @robertabarnhart6240 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@StrategicGamesEtc That's why medical personnel use gallows humor to get through the day - if you don't laugh, you'll cry. (Although, if you value your job, you don't let patients' families or other laypeople hear you making jokes.)

  • @imthatonegirl87
    @imthatonegirl87 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    When I worked at Blockbuster I told people to rent this movie because its the only move that started as a comedy and turned into a Documentary... I was too correct.

  • @sirius4k
    @sirius4k 2 ปีที่แล้ว +434

    Idiocracy 2006 - A Prophecy
    Idiocracy 2016-2020 - A Reality Show
    Idiocracy 2020+ - A Documentary

    • @gmancolo
      @gmancolo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      All the characters have some Hunter Biden in them.

    • @sirius4k
      @sirius4k 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gmancolo And a lot of generic trump supporters. I mean Trump's picks for secretaries of various fields was straight from the movie. Bunch of least qualified dumbasses, who are rich and Trump likes for one reason or another and that was good enough.
      The movie couldn't predict the shit the left is pulling, but they were spot on what will happen on the right.
      Stupidity is celebrated and facts don't matter if you don't agree with them.

    • @Intranetusa
      @Intranetusa 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​ @gmancolo The crack-ho nature of Hunter Biden, combined with the arrogant and grifting nature of Trump, and the forgetful speeches of Biden + made up words of Trump.

    • @criticalthinker3262
      @criticalthinker3262 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      @@gmancolo You are the person we're making fun of

    • @gmancolo
      @gmancolo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@criticalthinker3262 You're a bater.

  • @HWFchamp
    @HWFchamp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +431

    Idiocracy still has the greatest prison break in movie history.
    "Uh, I'm supposed to be getting out of prison."
    (smack) "Idiot. You're in the wrong line!"

    • @StrategicGamesEtc
      @StrategicGamesEtc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Nah; just kidding; I'm here for crucifixion.

    • @s.marshian8455
      @s.marshian8455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Yea, that guy already sat on my face and everything

    • @fritsdaalmans5589
      @fritsdaalmans5589 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@StrategicGamesEtc Always look on the bright side of life!

    • @Freakazoid12345
      @Freakazoid12345 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol

  • @pipolwes000
    @pipolwes000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +342

    "The Supreme Court does not do trials"
    That may be true, but we're talking about the EXTREME COURT here

    • @NickSachau
      @NickSachau 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      They also have original jurisdiction over disputes between States, ambassadors, and public ministers. Sooo technically can have trials.

  • @TehAmelie
    @TehAmelie 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Funny trivia and maybe an interesting tidbit re. the permission to kill any escaping prisoner: here in Sweden the law says, explicitly, that escaping imprisonment is not a crime. The rationale is that the human urge for freedom may not be criminalized.

  • @MC-ri8ku
    @MC-ri8ku 2 ปีที่แล้ว +88

    I never ever imagined in 2007 when I saw this movie that a real lawyer would even think of explaining to people that events in this movie are not real and legal.

    • @jameshejny7375
      @jameshejny7375 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      We've made it to the Idiocracy timeline

    • @Schnipps
      @Schnipps ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Honestly though, the fact that it's realistic now is the scary part XD

    • @mism847
      @mism847 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Schnipps It's not realistic XD

  • @jerichoswan
    @jerichoswan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1296

    "What a wildly unqualified member of cabinet in the whitehouse"
    "Corporate influence of a member of the cabinet in the whitehouse"
    "Straight up nepotism amongst the advisors to the president"
    "that would... what would never happen.. right?"
    The gradual despair in tone and looks as you went through the cabinet members XD Oh what crazy times we live in eh!

    • @SLKibara
      @SLKibara 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      That was genuinely depressing to watch

    • @jaredmoore2472
      @jaredmoore2472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Yup just like Bidens income was couple hundred grand to millions upon millions after being VP. Biden emails. Bidens campaign is going quiet till Thursday wonder why.

    • @gufosufo337
      @gufosufo337 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      True

    • @bryansylvestrew5024
      @bryansylvestrew5024 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@jaredmoore2472 Those emails were bad but were obtained illegally,Customer personal data cannot be sold when abandoned.

    • @SLKibara
      @SLKibara 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@bryansylvestrew5024 You know as an outsider looking in, I don't care if the next president you guys elect is a literal sex offender as long as he is competent in office and is willing to play ball with international leaders. I want to feel safe ALL THE WAY here in Australia.

  • @Sabrowsky
    @Sabrowsky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +549

    Least Camacho was actually interested in helping his country.
    I mean, as soon as someone smarter came up, he stepped down

    • @angc214
      @angc214 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Thank God no one is smarter than our current President. Einstein couldn't hold a candle to Trump. Lol

    • @sv32099
      @sv32099 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Lol that was funny camacho just didn't give a shit and realized his public image is probably even better if he were out of office.

    • @thesage1096
      @thesage1096 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@angc214 wtf ?? atleast in the department of physics id say Einstein is wayyyyyy smarter than mr trump

    • @angc214
      @angc214 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@thesage1096 look up the word sarcasm and try to understand its meaning.

    • @thesage1096
      @thesage1096 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@angc214 why shud I have to do that and what does orgasm have to do with it?????

  • @scottfitzpatrick1939
    @scottfitzpatrick1939 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I kept wishing they would make a sequel to this movie, but then I realized we are living in it.

  • @MrTurnipator
    @MrTurnipator 2 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    "A lawyer with a corporate sponsorship? That's completely ridiculous. Get 20% of the link in the description" GOLD!

  • @doctriv8596
    @doctriv8596 3 ปีที่แล้ว +417

    "Luke Wilson is not an unfit mother."
    Objection, counsel is drawing conclusions! Lol

  • @Dilligff
    @Dilligff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1359

    Watching Idiocracy:
    2006: Laughs hysterically.
    2020: Cries inconsolably.

    • @embracethebright1587
      @embracethebright1587 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      lmao

    • @BadgerOff32
      @BadgerOff32 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Shut up, I'm 'bating....

    • @newguy6935
      @newguy6935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      lmao, too

    • @ThomasIOsaze
      @ThomasIOsaze 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Underrated comment. 🙏🏼

    • @ataridc
      @ataridc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      yes because America has surpassed the stupidity of idiocracy and it isn't even half as funny

  • @MrLovegrove
    @MrLovegrove 2 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    Ever since I first saw this movie back in 2006, I called it the scariest movie I'd ever seen. A terrifying vision of an all too likely future. In the end, it took less than a generation for many of it's predictions to come true instead of centuries.

    • @SugarandSarcasm
      @SugarandSarcasm ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Same. Same… 😕

    • @tsriftsal3581
      @tsriftsal3581 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah, in that time we lost a generation that knew real suffering from the public consciousness. It's going to happen again so that we may repeat the mistakes and go along with the masses.

    • @raeje
      @raeje 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Back in.. I want to say 2014? 2015 ish? Cracked did a video showing how by that point Idiocracy was no longer a cautionary tale and had become a "best case scenario". A black president who can drive down the street on a motorcycle flipping off the masses with no fear of shooters? A cabinet with a female member who's ideas are treated equally by her peers? That the current head of state steps down to let a more qualified person take over? I think at this point it's now a pipe dream. Lowered expectations suck.

    • @mism847
      @mism847 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's extremely unlikely, what are you talking about?

    • @han090
      @han090 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The movie didn't really depict anything at all though, same as most dystopia films don't.
      They took problems that already existed in the US (Corruption, Corporate interference in politics, Anti Intellectualism, Vanity, Hyper Masculinity, Homophobia, Soulless automation etc) and exaggerated them to an extreme.

  • @leemiller29
    @leemiller29 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    12:58 - sounds like LegalEagle just found a new Idiocracy argument for the prosecution:
    Defense: "That's like, so unconstitutional, man."
    Prosecution: "Yeah but it's funny, though"

  • @donalny
    @donalny 3 ปีที่แล้ว +513

    "Obviously, Luke Wilson is not an unfit mother."
    I don't think you're in a place to judge his parenting skills. For all we know, he is a terrible mother.

    • @carlanderson5068
      @carlanderson5068 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      He’s biologically unfit to be a mother. ;)

    • @Anankin12
      @Anankin12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes but they're not a mother. They haven't any child hat we're aware of. Until the end of the movie that's it.

    • @GerBessa
      @GerBessa 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      He' supposed to be average as a mother.

    • @daveevans3204
      @daveevans3204 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      How do you know "Not Sure" didn't identify as a mother?

    • @wombatkidd
      @wombatkidd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He's the worst mother I've ever had.

  • @krieghart5515
    @krieghart5515 3 ปีที่แล้ว +442

    Realism rating:
    2006: F
    2020: A+

    • @e1123581321345589144
      @e1123581321345589144 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      damn, this movie's 14 years old? I feel ancient.

    • @JekyViews
      @JekyViews 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@e1123581321345589144 - it’s likely not gonna get better. *sigh*

    • @culwin
      @culwin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It was fairly accurate for 2006 too. More like a B+

  • @MacedonZero
    @MacedonZero 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    A former VP actually has been voted into the presidency before. 4 sitting VPs have won the presidency, and 2 former but not sitting VPs have won it

    • @jackmessick2869
      @jackmessick2869 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Sitting Vice Presidents: John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Martin van Buren, George H W Bush.
      Former VP: Nixon and Biden. What a pair!
      VP who got reelected after death of a President: not as many as you would think. First one was Teddy Roosevelt, then Calvin Coolidge, then Truman, then LB Johnson. The other 4 just served out the former President's term (Tyler, Fillmore, A Johnson, Arthur)

  • @ohgeegames
    @ohgeegames ปีที่แล้ว +85

    I'm truly surprised that you hadn't seen this movie before 2020... It really is one of my favorite documentaries, and also proof of time-travel. 😂

    • @PyroGam3s
      @PyroGam3s 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There's no time travel in the movie, i'm curious what your reasoning is on that.

    • @ohgeegames
      @ohgeegames 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @mikeraker7742 If i have to explain the joke, then you didn't get the joke. 🙂

    • @yutterh9153
      @yutterh9153 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@ohgeegames What you said wasn't a joke though 😅

    • @ohgeegames
      @ohgeegames 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@yutterh9153 You got the joke! 😂

    • @mism847
      @mism847 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yutterh9153It is a joke

  • @ronaldjames8615
    @ronaldjames8615 3 ปีที่แล้ว +626

    Every time he says "that would never happen" take a shot for the hope dying in his eyes

    • @toesheo
      @toesheo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Yes

    • @InTecknicolour
      @InTecknicolour 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      devin dying a little bit on the inside every time

    • @ukeyaoitrash2618
      @ukeyaoitrash2618 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah ikr its so funny 😆🤣

    • @PyroGam3s
      @PyroGam3s 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes so true, and yet he reaffirms his resolve that those things would never ever happen at the end of his video. Like, we aren't fooled dude, we know what you really think...

  • @inorite4553
    @inorite4553 3 ปีที่แล้ว +345

    There's a reason why its tagline is:
    "The movie that began as a comedy, but became a documentary."
    I love this movie!!!

    • @ms272885
      @ms272885 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Honestly been saying for over a decade Idiocracy is a documentary, but that was for the scientific/cultural aspects of it. The legal/political aspects also being a documentary (also honestly) blindsided me.

    • @goofusmaximus1482
      @goofusmaximus1482 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or a blueprint.

    • @lrgogo1517
      @lrgogo1517 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When did that become its tagline?

    • @goofusmaximus1482
      @goofusmaximus1482 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lrgogo1517 when reality decided it so.

    • @NJGuy1973
      @NJGuy1973 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      More like began as a comedy and ended up an instructional film.

  • @JenniferRademaker
    @JenniferRademaker ปีที่แล้ว +39

    This is an excellent and well spoken evaluation. I'm not a lawyer. I'm a state licensed funeral director with a BS in mortuary science

    • @LisaAnn777
      @LisaAnn777 ปีที่แล้ว

      What's a mortuary science

    • @marc-antoinemarcoux697
      @marc-antoinemarcoux697 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Would you like some EXTRA BIG ASS TACO now with MOLLECULES ?

    • @LisaAnn777
      @LisaAnn777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@marc-antoinemarcoux697 Mmm I love molecules.

    • @PyroGam3s
      @PyroGam3s 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      wait... you need college to bury someone?

    • @AMortalDefiant
      @AMortalDefiant 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@marc-antoinemarcoux697 As long as I can get some BRAWNDO (it's got electrolytes) to wash it all down.

  • @user-cl4lg8hs4s
    @user-cl4lg8hs4s 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I was in jail once back when I was 18. They had a chair with straps on it. It was rumored that if you were a "difficult" prisoner the guards would strap you to "the chair" and either beat the crap out of you outright, or at least make sure to "accidentally" bash your head on metal doors and walls and stuff like that. It may have just been a prop used to scare the youngsters like me tho'. I went to the same jail about 10 years later and saw no sign of "the chair".

  • @MurderousEagle
    @MurderousEagle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +139

    OBJECTION! Camacho realizes he made a mistake and gives credit to expert advisors he sought out for their expertise. That is NOT 2020

  • @spinal676
    @spinal676 3 ปีที่แล้ว +366

    Objection: George Bush was the vice president for Ronald Reagan, It has happened a total of 14 times

    • @spacedinosaur8733
      @spacedinosaur8733 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Excellent point.

    • @dallasswoveland4466
      @dallasswoveland4466 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      Yeah, was he making a joke or something?

    • @purplegill10
      @purplegill10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      He was making a joke

    • @ghyslainabel
      @ghyslainabel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I agree, I checked on Wikipedia, I also saw 14 names that went from vice-president to president.

    • @Lambda_Ovine
      @Lambda_Ovine 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@dallasswoveland4466 The joke depended on the assumption that Biden could be the first vice president to become president for it to work,. So, the correction stands and is deserved.

  • @UltraViolent21
    @UltraViolent21 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This isn’t a movie is a prophecy that is unfolding before our very eyes.

  • @iambiggus
    @iambiggus 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Not sure what was thicker, the sarcasm or the irony. Love your work sir.

  • @tymandude1510
    @tymandude1510 3 ปีที่แล้ว +737

    Objection: Luke Wilson is an unfit mother because he cannot be a mother thus it makes him unfit of the duty.

    • @mihneazarojanu5761
      @mihneazarojanu5761 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      That's what I thought they meant

    • @thedragonclan693
      @thedragonclan693 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I mean, have you seen how technology has been adapting? only thing he can't do is get pregnant and give birth at this point, with formula he can feed the child at a young age, and that's really the only other mother-specific thing. While the title is father, he can fill the mother role (not counting conception and birth and the pregnancy), just as vice president can fill the president role if need be.

    • @kyle9401
      @kyle9401 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      This particular commenter is on to something.

    • @gaidin21
      @gaidin21 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thedragonclan693 Formula is a pale substitute for the nutritional and immunization value of mother's milk.
      And many studies have shown that non-traditional parent households' kids are at certain disadvantages statistically.

    • @thedragonclan693
      @thedragonclan693 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@gaidin21 my point was simply that he could technically serve a fairly similar role to a mother, formula is a perfectly fine substitute however, as it is still nutritional enough that the baby doesn't starve, which means women who cannot breastfeed can have kids, and there are tons of different household types that would put a kid at a disadvantage, some traditional households would put kids at a disadvantage, the tradition doesn't matter, it's how the parent treats the child.

  • @Prizm44
    @Prizm44 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1012

    Joe: "Your Honor, I'm pretty sure we have a mistrial here"
    His lawyer: "I'll mistrial my foot up your ass"
    😂 such a great movie

    • @Goabnb94
      @Goabnb94 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Please listen!
      PlEaSe LiStEn!

    • @Gamerboy-yb3db
      @Gamerboy-yb3db 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@Goabnb94 GUILTY!

    • @thhomasmarks
      @thhomasmarks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      "don't bother me when I'm watching, "OWW MY BALLS!"

    • @blackleague212
      @blackleague212 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Goabnb94 We gonna go family style on your sister, you can join after we finished the starbucks part.

    • @linguineimpasta
      @linguineimpasta ปีที่แล้ว +10

      "I didn't do it!" "That's not what the other lawyer said"

  • @hannah_red
    @hannah_red 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    At 6:22, I love it when he says "There would be all kinds of reasons why you wouldn't want private enterprise to interfere with the criminal justice system itself." Like it doesn't already happen with the CCA lol.

  • @jeremygilbert7989
    @jeremygilbert7989 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Legal Eagle needs to brush up on his history. "A vice president who goes on to become president? Hasn't happened yet." Dude, literally the second president of the United States, John Adams, was the vice president for George Washington.

  • @yake222
    @yake222 3 ปีที่แล้ว +401

    We wouldn't want private enterprise involved in criminals justice. *looks at private prisons*

    • @tokiobabe99
      @tokiobabe99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      well, he did say it would be really bad if that happened. *looks at the general prison industrial complex and the rate of recidivism in the united states*

    • @commissarf1196
      @commissarf1196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      😬😬😬😬

    • @TheGuruStud
      @TheGuruStud 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tokiobabe99 and judges being paid to sentence kids to private camps....

    • @ShifuCareaga
      @ShifuCareaga 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep

  • @TheLibermania
    @TheLibermania 3 ปีที่แล้ว +394

    Other name of the video:
    "Lawyer slowly dying inside"

  • @xxDrain
    @xxDrain 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    15:00 I love how your jokes keep getting closer and closer to real impotent concern :D

  • @garryrichardson4572
    @garryrichardson4572 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    A former vice president becomes president. That’s so far fetched.😂

  • @ShadaOfAllThings
    @ShadaOfAllThings 3 ปีที่แล้ว +267

    I'm here for Eagle's soul leaving his body every time he has to go that hard on the sarcasm

    • @dallastexas5653
      @dallastexas5653 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Soul? He’s a lawyer.

    • @ShadaOfAllThings
      @ShadaOfAllThings 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@dallastexas5653 Contrary to popular belief he has one, its just been severely damaged by the initiatory rites that are law school and the bar exam. Most lawyers sell their souls for skill or lose it after it just DOES NOT want to be there anymore, but more than a few hang on, usually to have that pushed out of them eventually by other lawyers and the cases they have to try while in a toxic culture that does not at all one bit value mental health or logic beyond rhetoric
      Edit: the realization that we're just Rome 2 electric boogaloo keeps hitting me like a sledge hammer a week later

  • @scolkereybel
    @scolkereybel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +353

    "In Florida-"
    *cuts to an officer dragging a crocodile*

    • @Jartran72
      @Jartran72 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      What is the difference between an alligator and a crocodile? Some florida man or gal please explain.

    • @templar_1138
      @templar_1138 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I'm not in Florida, but: Alligators have shorter, wider snouts than crocodiles.

    • @slackerdc
      @slackerdc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      a police man dragging alligator off a driveway doesn't even make the top 10,000 strange things that happen in Florida every day.

    • @thewanderingmistnull2451
      @thewanderingmistnull2451 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@Jartran72 Alligators generally don't stray too far from water and also they are only in two locations, Florida Everglades and China. They are opportunistic feeders and are unlikely to attack unless provoked in some way (or starving). Crocodiles are more aggressive and more widespread. Alligators have U-shaped mouths while crocodiles' are more V-shaped, and when an alligator closes its mouth you can only see its top teeth, whereas with a crocodile you see both rows. Also, alligators are freshwater, crocodiles are saltwater.

    • @Shard18
      @Shard18 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      that was an adolescent Alligator

  • @garmezon9502
    @garmezon9502 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    0:14 VERY good timing xd

  • @Acradius
    @Acradius 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I've always said that I don't know whether to file this movie under comedy, horror, or documentary.

    • @Tedger
      @Tedger 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Future documentary

    • @mism847
      @mism847 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unrealistic comedy

  • @ReversedShadows
    @ReversedShadows 3 ปีที่แล้ว +121

    For legal realism as things are: A+
    For legal realism as things should be: F
    Gotta love America

    • @mism847
      @mism847 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Legal realism as things are: E-

  • @Jan_Koopman
    @Jan_Koopman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +431

    That moment when the dumbest legal movie ever gets the highest grade ever on this channel...

  • @zenacapulco
    @zenacapulco 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    YES! I've been saying this for years!
    In a little more than a decade, this movie went from comedy to documentary...

  • @Rkenton48
    @Rkenton48 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    2:50 He was unscannable. No tattoo. That's illegal in their time. Probable cause.

  • @Hairysteed
    @Hairysteed 3 ปีที่แล้ว +174

    8:08 _"Honestly that is not the worst opening statement I've heard in my life!"_ - Wow! Way to pique my curiosity!

    • @bsv103
      @bsv103 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It’s spelled “pique” in this context, actually.

    • @Hairysteed
      @Hairysteed 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@bsv103 I didn't know that! Then again English isn't my first language. Thanks!
      You sure it's not "peek"? ;D

    • @tomboedeker8479
      @tomboedeker8479 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@Hairysteed bsv103 is 100% correct, pique, not 'peek' and also not 'peak.' This is a VERY common usage error among native English speakers, including the highly educated, so it is completely excusable for you to have made this error. (Pique = verb meaning 'to cause a state of intellectual or emotional arousal.' Often a state of annoyance, in this case a state of curiosity. Peek = noun meaning 'A quick look at something.' A sneak-peek at an upcoming video game, or the game of peek-a-boo with an infant. Peak =noun 'Summit or highest point' such as a mountain-top or on a graph; valley or trough is the opposite. Sometimes used as a verb like 'the economy peaked in the second quarter of 2019.')

    • @Rystefn
      @Rystefn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Yeah, it's 100% pique, not peek, or peak, but it's no biggie. De-Frenchifying French loanwords is a tradition as old as English. Fun fact: it's basically the same word as "pick." So we already swapped vowel sounds on it anyway.

    • @greenyawgmoth
      @greenyawgmoth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I also would like to peek at what Devin considers the peak of bad opening statements. I'm sure it's quite piquant.

  • @kaptindeadpool4972
    @kaptindeadpool4972 3 ปีที่แล้ว +400

    "When I made Idiocracy I never knew I was making a documentary." -Mike Judge

    • @wades623
      @wades623 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      It would be more of a prophecy

    • @Hello-xg3qc
      @Hello-xg3qc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      In Idiocracy they at least listened to the intellectuals.

    • @williamtoccijr9579
      @williamtoccijr9579 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Hello-xg3qc but it took absolute proof before the idiots actually listened…

    • @Metal_Sign-Friday_Patchouli
      @Metal_Sign-Friday_Patchouli 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Hello-xg3qc Sounds like it's more of a fantasy, then.

  • @antimattv
    @antimattv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I don't know if it's been said before, but our host lawyer really comes across as a class act. Definitely going a long way to cleaning up the negative portrayal of lawyers by Hollywood at large.

  • @FrankRoosevelt32
    @FrankRoosevelt32 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    4:25 “Don’t mind me… just watering my hippies.” Lol one of my favorite memes of all time comes from a very similar mace vs. protesters situation.

  • @VolcyThoughts
    @VolcyThoughts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +325

    “So check it, the judge should be like guilty! Peace.”
    League Eagle: That’s actually not the worse opening statement I’ve heard.
    LMAOOOOOO WHAT?? WHAT IS HAPPENING IN OUR COURTS?! 🤣🤣🤣

    • @melissasilva4493
      @melissasilva4493 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      WE NEED TO KNOW

    • @Measos77
      @Measos77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      Sovereign citizens and taxation is theft people. I had the displeasure of observing a court case with those.

    • @Krescentwolf
      @Krescentwolf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@Measos77 oh god...if i got called for jury duty on a 'taxation is theft' person...i cant even imagine the migraine i'd get.

    • @iamzid
      @iamzid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@Krescentwolf if you want to get out of jury duty just make a few racist, sexist, or extremist statements when they're interviewing you. they won't call you back in. bonus points if you go in with a t-shirt that has the sleeves ripped off and a trucker hat.

    • @Xbox360mIRC
      @Xbox360mIRC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@iamzid I told them I was mentally unfit which its true and it worked.

  • @carloscaro9121
    @carloscaro9121 3 ปีที่แล้ว +209

    Objection: It's the EXTREME Court, not the Supreme Court.

  • @TakeruDavis
    @TakeruDavis 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The movie was classified as a comedy in 2006, nowadays I'd call it as a horror movie. The movie was a warning and we did not listen.

  • @nightfly1985
    @nightfly1985 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A lawyer with corporate sponsorship is what you have

  • @grumpynerd
    @grumpynerd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +298

    Comacho may have been a meathead, but his administration successfully tackled a major crisis threatening the survival of the country. That puts him there with Lincoln and FDR.

    • @velmawhite9830
      @velmawhite9830 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmmm🤔 Are we still drawing parallels here?

    • @theblacklion916
      @theblacklion916 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@velmawhite9830 key word is successfully

    • @grumpynerd
      @grumpynerd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      ​@@velmawhite9830 Contrasting. When faced with a problem he couldn't solve. Comacho, while applying a healthy dose of BS to grease the political gears, didn't try to BS his way out of it. Instead he found someone who could understand the problem, then used his bullshitting skills to protect that person so they could do their job. That's leadership.

    • @oblivi8games808
      @oblivi8games808 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Seeing FDR compared to Lincoln makes me die inside. Did no-one learn about how he put Asian-Americans in what were basically concentration camps during world war 2. Seriously.

    • @pmpowalisz
      @pmpowalisz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@oblivi8games808 Well Lincoln approved of scorched earth tactics in the confederacy. Merely the times their in dude.

  • @dagame81790
    @dagame81790 3 ปีที่แล้ว +221

    Objection!
    He isn't arrested for being an "unfit mother", he's arrested for being un-scannable (not displaying the legally required tattoo identification).

    • @stephaniemarquez7072
      @stephaniemarquez7072 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Might as well be an unfit mother lol

    • @mygalsiii
      @mygalsiii 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      But let's not forget, he was officially arrested for not paying his hospital bill... which they wouldn't know about until after arresting him for being unscannable... which they only noticed because he was at the scene of a crime... which because he didn't reasonably fit the description of being the unfit mother they were looking for meant they lacked probable cause to question him to begin with... which means being incorrect in applying probable cause can cause it to become probable???

    • @kvngn
      @kvngn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@mygalsiii What if the police already had a report about an unscannable particular individual who skipped out on his hospital bill? Maybe he fits that description -- or maybe the ID tattoos are so common that simply not having one counts as fitting that description.

    • @mygalsiii
      @mygalsiii 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kvngn then you'd hope the officer would have made mention of the "particular individual" fitting the description of a reported unscannable suspect that fled a hospital earlier in the day to the obviously new recruit in training he kept speaking to for training.

    • @Ikantspell4
      @Ikantspell4 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@peterdowdy174 incorrectly applying probable cause because you are stupid is unlikely. Cops of today's average intelligence make more leaps than a grasshopper to justify their cause and it's always upheld. Legal precedent states that probable cause never really existed exhibiting restraint in a few rare cases courts alluded to it but it never really worked out.

  • @saadkhalid5521
    @saadkhalid5521 10 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Objection: "A lawyer with a coporate sponsorship" -> Proceeds to give a corporate sponsorship whilst being a lawyer

  • @zackmeus7793
    @zackmeus7793 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    15:46, “Joe’s going to to fix all their problems and heal the economy” lol

  • @RoseThePhoenix
    @RoseThePhoenix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +201

    "Is this a documentary?"
    Hahaha, don't be silly. The idiocracy was EAGER to put the smartest person they could find in the government.

    • @the_kombinator
      @the_kombinator 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I remember watching this for the first time with my roommate back in 2009 or so. I was scared. Turns out I was right to be...

    • @icbarefoot
      @icbarefoot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      They did almost kill him though. So not exactly. It’s pretty much the same, we’ll give experts the microphone but then ignore and ridicule their advice.

    • @Demortra
      @Demortra 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@Plumpkitters4u Dude, you turned a blanket statement into a political one. Congrats on playing the red vs blue game, read both sides, assume 90% of what the politician says is lies, then double-check to make sure their 'achievements' were not just a lump of coal. I swear to god the lot of Republicans and Democrats don't care about politics only what will piss the other off.

    • @alw2839
      @alw2839 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Demortra Unfortunately that's the way a lot of people have become I've heard it started with Reagan but I don't know about that....

    • @48917032
      @48917032 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Plumpkitters4u How about I damn you for being a mindless cultist instead?

  • @MrFreakRite
    @MrFreakRite 3 ปีที่แล้ว +236

    "that's not the worst opening statement I've heard"
    Ok sir, you're gonna have to elaborate on that? Mkay?

    • @pigs18
      @pigs18 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      "They helped me when I turned into a dog."

    • @josesaavedra5623
      @josesaavedra5623 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I wanna hit like, but it's at 100.

    • @AtheneHolder
      @AtheneHolder 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah because I would loe to hear this one

    • @kevinyarosh3528
      @kevinyarosh3528 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I rarely comment but I absolutely need to back this.

  • @lawyeroutlaw
    @lawyeroutlaw ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Objection: SCOTUS has original jurisdiction along with appellate jurisdiction, and so long as Congress has made no exceptions or done away with them (Art III,2) and the crime he committed was in DC, then it is possible SCOTUS here *could* do a trial if it chose to...

  • @andimatrus
    @andimatrus 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It turned out to be a documentary faster than I thought!!!

  • @catfreak192
    @catfreak192 3 ปีที่แล้ว +273

    "That's completely unrealistic. That would never happen in the United States."
    Tell the truth, how many takes did you have to scrap because you burst into tears after saying that?

    • @Methrael
      @Methrael 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Zero.
      ... He started crying instead.

    • @SEGAClownboss
      @SEGAClownboss 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Poor Devin

    • @MisterJackTheAttack
      @MisterJackTheAttack 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      He must have done hundreds, and he still tears up.

  • @andrearaimondi882
    @andrearaimondi882 3 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    Before I even start watching, can we please all appreciate that Devin felt the need to specify?? 🤣🤣🤣

  • @rowanhanning8077
    @rowanhanning8077 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I appreciated the "this could never happen" bits with context. Bravo.

  • @michaelandreas2177
    @michaelandreas2177 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Idiocracy was prophetic. They only thing they got wrong is that it didn't take 500 years.

  • @DanielKlein23
    @DanielKlein23 3 ปีที่แล้ว +289

    "It's so unconstitutional but at the same time it's very, very funny."
    That's the tag line for 2020, isn't it.

    • @YingofDarkness
      @YingofDarkness 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Objection! 2020 is not funny at all.

    • @HENJAM48
      @HENJAM48 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ahem... Jan 2017 thru Jan 2021

    • @Ericwvb2
      @Ericwvb2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      But it's funny "uh oh" and not funny "ha ha."

    • @Tykku88
      @Tykku88 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Solid legal defense

  • @andrewgutmann9432
    @andrewgutmann9432 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Objection: the reasonable person standard uses a hypothetical person in society who exercises average care, skill, and judgment in conduct as a comparative standard. If the average person is a complete idiot, then the reasonable person standard would ‘allow’ behavior that we might consider to be very, very dumb.

  • @johnstevenson9956
    @johnstevenson9956 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've said for a long time that "Idiocracy" is the most accurate "dupicshun" of the future I've ever seen. Except I never imagined the future would happen quite so quickly.

  • @the_omg3242
    @the_omg3242 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Idiocracy used to be a satire. Now it's a documentary.

  • @PancorRath
    @PancorRath 3 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    2006: haha, we'll never end up like Idiocracy
    2020: **LOOMS IN BACKGROUND**

    • @Yora21
      @Yora21 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Stands in foreground.

    • @azcomicgeek
      @azcomicgeek 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No background needed, it's current history.

    • @the_kombinator
      @the_kombinator 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      When I saw the movie about 10 years ago, I had a feeling this would happen. And it is.

    • @gabrielgarcia640
      @gabrielgarcia640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Trump watched this movie and thought it was an instructional video but fell asleep halfway through it.

  • @A.F.Whitepigeon
    @A.F.Whitepigeon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +250

    Now we must know: What _was_ the worst opening statement you've ever heard?

    • @logantravis2084
      @logantravis2084 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Seconded

    • @AB-ee5tb
      @AB-ee5tb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Pingo21 squared

    • @alucard347
      @alucard347 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@AB-ee5tb quadrupled.

    • @Dan-uf2vh
      @Dan-uf2vh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      no doubt something about Chewbacca living on Endor - it makes no sense!

  • @wereszycki
    @wereszycki ปีที่แล้ว +7

    18:42 Four sitting vice presidents have been elected president: John Adams in 1796, Thomas Jefferson in 1800, Martin Van Buren in 1836, and George H. W. Bush in 1988. Likewise, two former vice presidents have won the presidency, Richard Nixon in 1968 and Joe Biden in 2020.

  • @emmasprague5465
    @emmasprague5465 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    18:41 objection, john adams and thomas jefferson both served as vice presidents and were then elected to the office of the presidency

  • @swashhustler1326
    @swashhustler1326 3 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    "Did they predict the future?" No. They just warned us of what could be.

    • @eZU4nQsWN9pAGsU38aHj
      @eZU4nQsWN9pAGsU38aHj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      And since humans forget history every couple of years...

    • @LadyOcon
      @LadyOcon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It has always happened. But now we have social media to record it at The moment...

    • @CNC-Time-Lapse
      @CNC-Time-Lapse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      ... and no one listened. :/

    • @thewanderingmistnull2451
      @thewanderingmistnull2451 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This is nothing more than a view of what government has always looked like. The only difference is that people are paying attention to it now when they didn't in history class.

    • @WhaleManMan
      @WhaleManMan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Idiocracy: *explicit satire of the Bush Presidency*
      Internet: I cAnT BeLieVe tHiS PrEdiCteD THe FuTuRE

  • @andrewscott7728
    @andrewscott7728 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    The only prediction this movie got wrong was that society's leaders would value a smart person and put them in charge rather than demonizing experts.

  • @77mpickett
    @77mpickett 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I literally almost choked to death when they 1st cut to the secretary of education. I didn't see that one coming

  • @Michael_H_Nielsen
    @Michael_H_Nielsen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Your editor does a great job 💪

  • @laurinlatour4246
    @laurinlatour4246 3 ปีที่แล้ว +258

    This movie scared me when it was new. Now that certain things have come to pass, it scares me way more

    • @henrylockhart495
      @henrylockhart495 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Seriously! All my friends love the comedy and I’m over here like “this movie is terrifying, what are you guys talking about?”

    • @SugarandSarcasm
      @SugarandSarcasm ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Part of the reason why I would like to have a child (even though I realize that just because I am slightly intelligent, it doesn’t mean my offspring would be).

    • @M50A1
      @M50A1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@henrylockhart495considering you take this movie as gospel, I don't think you're terrified in the way you're trying to portray

    • @mism847
      @mism847 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@henrylockhart495 For your group of online doomers, an egg dropping to the ground would be "terrifying", a small house being destroyed would be "horrifying", and the need to get out of the bed and brush your teeth would be "dystopian". Man, I hate it when you guys exaggerate the living crap out of everything and believe that Murphy's Law is applicable to reality. How about you spend less time online doomscrolling and thinking you have an unbiased perspective on things? The future and the present is nothing like 2505, on the contrary, things seem to generally get better.

    • @MiracleFound
      @MiracleFound 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@M50A1grow a sense of humor for the good of everyone who has to suffer your presence.

  • @Acularius
    @Acularius 3 ปีที่แล้ว +492

    LegalEagle: "For 2006 this was completely unrealistic... for 2020 - A+"
    Me: "I miss living in precedented times..."

    • @automaticspaz
      @automaticspaz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      I want to live in un president ed times.

    • @feldegast
      @feldegast 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      In the book Interesting Times by Terry Pratchett there is a curse, "may you live in interesting times" before Trump was elected I did not fully understand this curse, now......

    • @WhaleManMan
      @WhaleManMan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Idiocracy: *explicit satire of the Bush Presidency*
      Internet: I cAnT BeLieVe tHiS PrEdiCteD THe FuTuRE

    • @sleepykitty8918
      @sleepykitty8918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@WhaleManMan The hate train is too easy for people to jump on.

    • @sleepykitty8918
      @sleepykitty8918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @drew pedersen If you say so.

  • @MicoRich
    @MicoRich หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A lawyer wirh a corporate sponsor is NOT ridiculous. It’s exactly what happens. It’s just hidden from the public because it’s CRIME!

  • @CGRREDACTED
    @CGRREDACTED 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You may have missed this LegalEagle. At 2:48 you said the police did not have probable cause to arrest luke Wilson. But they did. because at 2:08 the police do in fact state why he is being arrested. "This particular individual is unscannable." every citizen of the future has a tattooed UPC barcode on their wrist, and luke's unbutton sleeve revealed he did not have this UPC tattoo which is a crime.
    At 12:18 you said, "can the state conduct warrantless surveillance?" It wasn't. In this future, Costco as well as all other retail establishments use passive direct marketing. Just like in Minority Report. I only flagged him because when the system looked for information about prior purchases the only record found was his arrest and the system switch automatically from sales to public safety.

  • @juliadandy6019
    @juliadandy6019 3 ปีที่แล้ว +463

    “Idiocracy” is indeed a sad glimpse into the future, thought the first time I watched it. Just never expected it would be the NEAR future.

    • @alexschalk5439
      @alexschalk5439 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      I don't really agree with it's whole eugenics undertone though.

    • @GoatMen
      @GoatMen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@alexschalk5439 I do though

    • @diogenesoliveira6473
      @diogenesoliveira6473 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@alexschalk5439 yeah in the end idiocy spread through memes, not genes ("memes" as Dawkins described them)

    • @barakav3483
      @barakav3483 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's the 5G, it turns us into idiots who belives that the workd is round!
      I thnik this movie is already quite accurate.

    • @alexschalk5439
      @alexschalk5439 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@barakav3483 I seriously hope you're trolling

  • @KingGrio
    @KingGrio 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    15:35 "Did this movie predict the future ? What am I seeing right now ?"
    If you are saying that while looking out your window, then the answer might be 'The Prequel to Idiocracy'.

    • @kennyholmes5196
      @kennyholmes5196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not the prequel. the AU version.

    • @classifiedveteran9879
      @classifiedveteran9879 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This entire segment was quite disheartening, and hit close to home...

  • @jdotoz
    @jdotoz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Objection: the review apparatus for pardon applications is not required by any law, nor can it be since the Constitution vests the pardon power solely in the President. If the President determines that he knows enough about the case to issue a pardon, he does in fact have the authority to do so - and there's certainly nothing new about it happening in cases where there's a conflict of interest.

  • @valentinarunko67
    @valentinarunko67 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "A former vice-president that gets elected president? Hasn't happened yet."
    Thomas Jefferson: Am I a joke to you?
    😂😂😂

  • @robertfitzpatrick1943
    @robertfitzpatrick1943 3 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    Objection: historical accuracy issue. John Adams, the second president of the United States, was the vice President of George Washington. Thomas Jefferson, Martin Van Buren, and George H.W. Bush were also former vice presidents duly elected to the Presidency later. A former vice president has in fact become the Elected President.

    • @Heijk
      @Heijk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Counterargument: None of those mentioned were elected as former vice presidents, but rather as sitting vice presidents.
      Objection: Richard Nixon, however, in 1968 became the first (and only) former vice president to be elected president.

    • @culwin
      @culwin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He was being sarcastic.

    • @AnonymousStudentT
      @AnonymousStudentT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Albin Delibas Heijkenskjöld Objection: Both Harry Truman and Lyndon B. Johnson were Vice Presidents who assumed the Presidency after their predecessors died in office and then went on to win the next election. So, they could be classified as former Vice Presidents who were later elected to the Presidency.

    • @WoolyNips
      @WoolyNips 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@culwin there is no such thing as satire in TH-cam Court.

    • @andymonserud9029
      @andymonserud9029 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lyndon Johnson and Theodore Roosevelt can also both be added to the list, but not to Albin's list. Each served as VP to a president who was assassinated, and ascended to the presidency that way, but each was later duly elected.

  • @narnigrin
    @narnigrin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +171

    I was so confused about that police officer wrestling a gator for a moment.
    Until I realised Devin was just illustrating the concept of "Florida"

    • @ScottChristianSimmons
      @ScottChristianSimmons 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      In the context of the discussion at that point of the video, I assumed that was a police alligator which had just been unleashed to capture a fleeing fugitive, and which was now being returned to the police van. Standard Florida police force escalation procedure: verbal commands, taser, K-9, alligator, improvised explosive device, pigpile.

    • @morticiaheisenberg9679
      @morticiaheisenberg9679 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Florida man got a job as a cop. Lol

    • @leev211
      @leev211 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I thought it was a police alligator too, and it was shown as the police using unnecessary force

    • @spacedinosaur8733
      @spacedinosaur8733 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I assumed it was an example of a police officer using an approved method of deadly force. "He's running, get ready to deploy the Gator."

    • @chapablo
      @chapablo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm from Florida. Can confirm.

  • @Julia-lk8jn
    @Julia-lk8jn ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I swear, at 16:09 I thought for two seconds that Legal Eagle was using a real-world Faux News segment for comparison. Explosion sound effects, bullet sound effects ... sound exactly like Rupert Murdoch's brain child.

  • @forrestcommander6283
    @forrestcommander6283 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just to clarify, list of VPs who were elected President
    1:John Adams
    2: Thomas Jefferson
    3: Martin Van Buren
    4: Theodore Roosevelt
    5: Calvin Coolidge
    6: Harry S Truman
    7: Lyndon B. Johnson
    8: Richard Nixon
    9: George H. W. Bush
    I do have a feeling that was slightly sarcastic, though.
    Fun fact, out of those 9, Adams, Jefferson, Nixon and Bush were the only 4 who never obtained the Presidency as a result of a predecessor death or resignation.

  • @burrowowl
    @burrowowl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    Objection: the defense attorney's sleeve wasn't a a corporate advertisement, it was labeling him as an attorney.

    • @Ferret440
      @Ferret440 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Rofl, thank you for pointing out that detail. I love this movie.

  • @benn454
    @benn454 3 ปีที่แล้ว +684

    I love how you can see him die a little more inside every time one of Idiocracy's predictions came true.

    • @sigurdtheblue
      @sigurdtheblue 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Not predictions in most of these cases. Instead, it just shows how terrible the legal system is in America that pretty much everything is allowed to be used against you, including abuse of government powers.

    • @thhomasmarks
      @thhomasmarks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It did, 2016 the Trump Administration have you ever known of a bigger buffoon?

    • @noctisocculta4820
      @noctisocculta4820 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Those sorts of things had happened and were continuing to happen long before Idiocracy was filmed. This movie was contemporary satire, and the fact you think this was a future prediction is sad.

    • @themachoechidnaugandarandy7583
      @themachoechidnaugandarandy7583 ปีที่แล้ว

      I mean it's not any better today. Never forget 2+2=5 because math is racist towards blacks.

    • @TV-ob1if
      @TV-ob1if ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sigurdtheblue there is no better legal system in the world. Change my mind

  • @rifter0x0000
    @rifter0x0000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm sure legal eagle was joking about the VP thing. Because he would know there have been a lot of those. Like Teddy Roosevelt, Papa Bush, Adams, and Jefferson. He probably also remembers that Jesse Ventura ran for president. Camacho epitomizes our tendency to vote for politicians because we like them. Kind of like that line in "Crimes of the Hot (Futurama)": " Fortunately, our handsomest politicians came up with a cheap last-minute way to combat globaI warming."