53:37 from Collins dictionary: EXPAT: An expatriate is someone who is living in a country which is not their own. so it means Michael Breen has lived in Korea?
and the emphasis should be put on **living in a country**? but yeah, i understand why you say he can be living in Hong Kong, Britain, or elsewhere. lol
@@CL-eu9kh Can’t be Hong Kong, which is not a country. Can’t be Britain, which is his own country. So it has to be elsewhere, and South Korea is just a possible, not necessary, somewhere. lol
多謝ChuLowC既詳細解釋，想問最後果題"his view of Koreans and their achievements" ，點解個答案唔係作者覺得 既然做咁多野都唔會happy，所以暗示左佢覺得韓國人做咁多野都係meaningless? 但個marking scheme既答案好似只係講番篇passage已知既野咁，似乎冇推進到任何野。
57:51 The question asks what does it imply, and it doesn't ask about what does it imply about North Korea or South Korea or anything really. I answered 'Only the list of must-read books about South Korea has been mentioned by the writer.' Do you think my answer makes sense? Also, I don't think the writer necessarily implies 'North Korea is more interesting/popular/attractive than South Korea' and 'there is a greater interest in reading about North Korea' just by his sentence 'the list of must-read books about North Korea is far longer'. First of all, the criteria of 'must-read' is set up by the writer himself. Also, publication of North Korea books can be about greater interest in writing, political reasons or anything really. I understand you think publication = interest in Korea = higher demands of N. Korea books, but merely saying 'his sentence implies supply of publication is high' is faulty I guess? Just my 5 cents.
You need to understand the meaning of “imply” first. An implication is by definition something that is suggested or indirectly stated. Your response “Only the list of must-read books about South Korea has been mentioned by the writer” is quite obvious, too direct I’m afraid. It is an inference, not an implication. Many can mix up “infer” and “imply”. Implication questions are among the most difficult as they demand good comprehension of both the text and the world, which always involves a certain degree of subjectivity. Sometimes I disagree with the EAA marking scheme, but this time I mostly agree, and have nothing new to add to my comment in the video.
你講得好好！我24dser 真係幫咗好多
thanks a lot!!! 竟然解卷片仲好睇過Netflix
啋！快啲好好考完個試睇真Netflix吧啦
多謝ChuLowC！❤️
好鍾意你啲Dse reading 嘅片👍🏻👍🏻講得好好，又唔會悶，好用心解釋成篇文章，仲有題目嘅keywords、答案。有差唔多睇晒你解past paper啲片同認真做past paper。
By reading 5* 嘅2021 dser
很榮幸陪伴各位走過了一些日子，伽菲同學也要好好努力回饋社會😌👍。
好多謝阿sir係百忙中都抽時間益我地😂，拍得好有心機，好鍾意你既演繹，衷心多謝朱老師
益呢個字，就好似魚菜共生，好多時係相向嘅……
53:37
from Collins dictionary: EXPAT: An expatriate is someone who is living in a country which is not their own.
so it means Michael Breen has lived in Korea?
and the emphasis should be put on **living in a country**?
but yeah, i understand why you say he can be living in Hong Kong, Britain, or elsewhere. lol
@@CL-eu9kh Can’t be Hong Kong, which is not a country. Can’t be Britain, which is his own country. So it has to be elsewhere, and South Korea is just a possible, not necessary, somewhere. lol
@@ChuLowC LOL you're very funny
Congratulations 🎉 ❤️ChuLowC has 1K subscribers 🥳
好有心機，好豐富，好好睇🥰係咪考DSE 都覺得好正👍🏻
Thank you very much Vicky. I believe I’ve gained some extra subs because of you. They want to read your comments full of love. 🤣🙏🏻
@@ChuLowC Really ?😻 Wow 💃🏻💃🏻💃🏻so exciting 🥁🥁🥁
又點會因為小小comments 而追訪呢🙈 ChuLowC先至係主角，我每次聽ChuLowC演繹嘅內容真係好似跟住文章去遊歷一樣，加上你把聲，你讀個 T
音好好聽😆😆
ChuLowC 1K subs. 點慶祝😆不如開個live 😻👍🏻
@@vickyho617 多謝。慶祝方式=繼續默默拍片…
我都係教補習英文
我地d style都幾似xddd
所以有時都會睇一次你點教haha
keep it up 朱sir!
榮幸之至。共同為推高香港英語水平0.0000009%而努力。
阿sir講解得超好
(嗰標題真係好正！
🥶🥶
多謝ChuLowC既詳細解釋，想問最後果題"his view of Koreans and their achievements" ，點解個答案唔係作者覺得 既然做咁多野都唔會happy，所以暗示左佢覺得韓國人做咁多野都係meaningless? 但個marking scheme既答案好似只係講番篇passage已知既野咁，似乎冇推進到任何野。
喺paper 1要答”suggest”題，需要睇得明文章嘅暗藏意思，再寫得返出嚟，唔係好多同學過到呢關，做得到已經係社會需要嘅識英文嘅人材😂。考開中文、中國文學、英國文學嘅朋友要留意調整答法。
我嘅立場：其實一份閱讀卷嘅問題同答案based on原文係理所當然嘅，反而點樣按住原文去「推進」我覺得可圈可點，以同學寫嘅為例，題目寫明係”achievements”，你演繹為”meaningless嘅嘢”，我覺得幾危險。我睇到作者問嘅係「點解韓國人做咗咁多咁正咁meaningful 嘅嘢，都仲係咁憂鬱，佢哋到底想點？」焦點係韓國人嘅心理。同學嘅「推進」似乎唔係Not given咁簡單，簡直係False。
又如果同學嘅”meaningless”意思係指韓國人做埋呢啲achievements對全世界有意義但對韓國人自己冇意義，咁你只係將not happy定義為meaningless，係一個幾狹隘嘅定義式答法，我見唔到任何推進。
阿sir如果開補習班一定會有好多人報
57:30 如果寫the list of must-read books about Korea係咪唔得？
很接近呀👏👏我覺得唔得，但當年評卷員可能話得，I don’t know。
我觉得这年A都好难
如果8:31嗰度嘅They寫咗The other journalists in the Economist得唔得？
不合理地狹窄，唔得。
@@ChuLowC thanks!!🙏🏻
57:51 The question asks what does it imply, and it doesn't ask about what does it imply about North Korea or South Korea or anything really. I answered 'Only the list of must-read books about South Korea has been mentioned by the writer.' Do you think my answer makes sense?
Also, I don't think the writer necessarily implies 'North Korea is more interesting/popular/attractive than South Korea' and 'there is a greater interest in reading about North Korea' just by his sentence 'the list of must-read books about North Korea is far longer'. First of all, the criteria of 'must-read' is set up by the writer himself. Also, publication of North Korea books can be about greater interest in writing, political reasons or anything really. I understand you think publication = interest in Korea = higher demands of N. Korea books, but merely saying 'his sentence implies supply of publication is high' is faulty I guess?
Just my 5 cents.
You need to understand the meaning of “imply” first. An implication is by definition something that is suggested or indirectly stated. Your response “Only the list of must-read books about South Korea has been mentioned by the writer” is quite obvious, too direct I’m afraid. It is an inference, not an implication. Many can mix up “infer” and “imply”.
Implication questions are among the most difficult as they demand good comprehension of both the text and the world, which always involves a certain degree of subjectivity. Sometimes I disagree with the EAA marking scheme, but this time I mostly agree, and have nothing new to add to my comment in the video.
呢份卷算唔算難 分數比平時做出版社啲卷低左成十幾二十分🥲🥲 定係我太見識淺薄。 補返啱啱對埋B 2仲高分過part A十幾分🫠🫠🫠🫠
人人盲點不同，唔出奇呀，不過2015 B2係公認題材最難的。
44:01 你解卷真係好好笑好有趣XD 識少少韓文嘅表示 Jeong(讀做有鼻音嘅蒼)=정=情 XDDDD一直聽到Jeng Jeng Jeng 真係好正 哈哈哈
唔識韓文嘅表示必須要識得讀Jeng先可以快速準確命中第22題☝🏽
通常我自己識韓文嘅學生啲英文都麻麻desu，希望聖家堂同學打破呢個宿命🤗🤗
@@ChuLowC umm其實麻麻desu係日文...麻麻yo先係韓文(siu jor
不過我認自己英文差, 早期DSE考生不幸地當年P1 B2淨係識做第一版TAT(小心翼翼地唔暴露年齡...不過睇到果年你冇解 咁睇嚟我呢世都唔會知篇文點解😆)
英文DSE最後低空飛過 靠啲理科入到三大🤫
不過當今年需要重考DSE英文時，操到近年Paper 1有發現淺咗(應該唔係我英文好咗TVT)
希望今年P1 B2唔好出autobiography，就算要出都出Stephen Hawking嘅, 一齊探討下黑洞🤭
咁應該就靠你啲解題片可以安全升Grade QvQ 到時再上嚟報喜報平安www
@@twinklelf23 唔識韓文嘅只係曬吓啲日文啫，有啲嘢唔攞出嚟曬吓會發霉🌞
早期…我冇解…自傳…太易估啫🌞🌞
果然要有返啲閱歷先至有閒情同深度喺度同豬滷司吹水，豬滷司果然係自修生嘅好伙伴🌞🌞🌞
好想知道點解要重考DSE英文，我以為只有補習老師要證明自己仲好年青把寶刀仲未生銹🤖
Q4 如果寫咗British people 得唔得🙏🫡
Timestamp please
thank you for your explanation😂😂
👋Drop by again.
因為用 expat, 要住在韓國才可以用 expat
British expat，只知道不是住英國，為什麼一定要住韓國
Q31 如果寫 Daniel thinks that Koreans should be more optimistic about what they have achieved 得唔得？
請報時。
@@ChuLowC 1:06:08 btw估唔到呀sir咁快覆🥳
@@jamesfung6335 所以要報時幫阿sir慳返啲時間🌝
achieved a great deal冇答到；optimistic係樂觀，係對將來嘅感覺，同要滿足於現在係兩樣嘢。
結論係0分，同學多手將原文嘅happier錯誤paraphrase做more optimisitc出事。
@@ChuLowC 好 唔該呀sir 第一次留言唔識規矩😂
討厭英文既我見到L段片都有返d心機操卷
討厭拍片嘅我見到L段留言都有返d心機拍片
q10 但係佢淨係講話韓國人係expressive ,都冇話西方人都係咁樣，點解就變咗similarity (佢可以話係西方人本身都係好內向，佢覺得亞洲東方都係好內向，但係佢哋唔,再加上個Title已經講話from the Cold 咁西方人點會都係expressive）
q13daniel 係覺得K-Pop膚淺咋喎，點解就變咗Both
help pls🥲🥲
Q10首先同學搞錯咗一樣嘢，題目講嘅係西方人，冷漠保守同from the cold嘅係英國人，不代表整個歐洲同埋北美洲南美洲，所以論expressiveness而言，Westerners ～Koreans >> Britons (～: 相若於）
Q10 要考生喺第5段短短三行搵一個similarity同一個difference，唔係問”西方人都好expressive”呢個statement係T/F/NG。局住填答案嘅情況下，not explicitly given嘅訊息都極有可能當implicitly given咁考慮。正如我片中所講，我都運用咗一啲文本以外嘅常識去答呢題。至於文本以內，steroeotype呢個字俾我感覺係暗示對非我族類嘅一啲刻板印象，而作者澄清呢啲印象in fact係假嘅時候，佢冇講到嗰句即係「我哋」同「佢哋」原來冇我哋所想像咁唔同，大家都係similar。
Q13 唔明