Should You GM Wardens of Wildwood? - Part 2 (SPOILERS)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @Niktorak_
    @Niktorak_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Hey, the quote from Andrew White comes from a response he sent me via Discord after I had posted my written review. If you want the full doc explaining everything he said point by point to my feedback I can send you the Doc Andrew White sent me.

    • @HowItsPlayed
      @HowItsPlayed  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That would be great! Can you send it on Twitter (@howitsplayed_) or facebook (facebook.com/HowItsPlayed)? Thanks!

  • @BrambleBear
    @BrambleBear 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You mentioned Ruzadoya getting a head start by the time to learn how to use the portal, but the adventure details at the start of the chapter that she immediately went through following the ritual that cut Idyllis off from the plane of Wood; which gives her at least a 2 week head start plus the time it takes to siege the island and figuring out how to use the portal.

  • @kylethoren1949
    @kylethoren1949 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you for doing all of these. Great information. Makes it easy for me to decide what to run next.

  • @donm6552
    @donm6552 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    This is solid stuff - thanks a lot for the overview.

  • @silverwolf5101
    @silverwolf5101 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Please continue to do the great work you're doing ! The internet is not always a friendly place, but for almost all of the Pathfinder 2nd edition players who know you, know the quality of your content.
    I myself do not like adventure campaigns for any system, but find your videos entertaining. However, if I'm unsure of a rule for Pathfinder 2, I find it easier to refer to your videos and then going to the rule book.
    Thank you for your stellar work!

    • @HowItsPlayed
      @HowItsPlayed  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for the kind words!

  • @BardTails
    @BardTails 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My group for this AP started with Fistful of Flowers and I just let them be level 5 after some time passed after that when they were invited to the gala for saving fellow residents of the Verduran Forest.

  • @danrimo826
    @danrimo826 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this!

  • @travisbaggett2813
    @travisbaggett2813 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love all How It's Played adventure path videos!

  • @mirrikybird
    @mirrikybird 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Howl of the Wilds book contains the rules for large PC's navigating smaller spaces, just off the top of my head a large creature would have greater difficult terrain when a medium creature has difficult terrain from a tight spot

  • @bettsdn
    @bettsdn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My players will 100% refer to that one character in book 3 as Xzibit and will make no-stop Pimp my Ride references.

  • @unservant
    @unservant 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I like this longer review format. A lot of the previous videos were superficial. Good adventures are quite rare and writing them is an art form. Especially elements like structure and player agency are not well understood.
    Nice to see you roll up your arms and dig in

  • @dmeep
    @dmeep 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I enjoy your videos and find them very helpful screening APs for potential GMing

  • @derskalde4973
    @derskalde4973 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Unrelated, but I need some help: can someone tell me what the spear is you can get from Xamanthe Silverfire in the Kingmaker AP?
    I have the strong suspicion, that there was a mistake during Translation, because I just can't find what a _variable_ spear is meant to be. I assume it's meant to be a versatile spear, so you probably can choose between piercing and slashing damage.
    On a similar Note, can someone maybe explain to me, why Annamede Belavarah is mad at the PCs, if they win during the hunt in chapter 5? Or is that maybe a translation error? Because no matter how often I read her statblock, I feel like I'm missing something.

  • @Ironbearjones
    @Ironbearjones 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The difference between an earnest review and a lot of your other content is that a review requires literary analysis and critical thought. This had none of that , and even the attempts you pulled from sources you actively refused to cite properly was piecemeal and incorrect in places. It's profoundly disappointing..