The Name is turning the world upside-down again. YOD-HAY-UAU is YAHU. SHIN-AYIN is the suffix in ALISHA (H477) and YAHUSHA (H3091). H3068 (YOD-HAY-UAU-HAY) uses four vowels for the Name of YAHUAH in at least 6,823 places in Scripture. The suffix SHA is from the root YASHA (YOD-SHIN-AYIN. The prophet "ISA-IAH" is YASHAYAHU, YAHU+SHA is H3091, and found 216 times. It means "I am your Deliverer." It was first used at Num. 13:16 when the name of HUSHA (H1954) was altered.
@LewWhite10 --- Yeah, you are "turning the world upside-down" Lew and in the wrong direction. I pray for all of the people you have led astray over the years with your perversion of the Hebrew and the false gospel that you promote by telling people they can only be saved if they use the name Yahusha or that God will not hear them unless they call out Yahuah. Yahuah and Yahusha **never** existed in Hebrew and cannot be constructed according to proper and legitimate past or present Hebrew grammar. However, that does not stop you from continuing to claim to be a Hebrew expert and passing off flawed grammar rules as truth. All you are doing is taking the YHWH and infusing it with your flawed grammar and lie to people by claiming your fake name shows up "6,823 places in Scripture" and on numerous inscriptions, but the only thing that shows up is YHWH, not Yahuah. Have you no shame for that deception? Even more tragic is how you have people believing that the New Testament is flawed, that Jesus is a false Christ and that there was a secret conspiracy to remove the truth from the Bible or were inserted in the Bible just to debunk your claims. Very convenient!! When you can't fight back against truth that refutes your lies, you just make up conspiracies and misinformation. I hope one day the many that follow you will wake up to see how you have led them astray.
@@Refuteit YHWH, the popularized form for the 4 Hebrew vowels of the Name, YAHUAH, is slightly incorrect. No one should be condemned for making a mistake, until they are shown the Truth, and reject it. It is Yahusha in us Who guides us into all Truth. Without His indwelling, we are helpless and will fall prey to the rules of men. The letter "double-U" (VV) is a new letter added after the invention of the printing press. The Latin letter V is not the VEE sound most think it is today, but simply the way the Latin alphabet inherited the Greek letter UPSILON, known by the sound of our modern letter "U." The double-U is a misrepresentation of the Hebrew letter UAU, simply the sound of U, as in the names NetanYahu, AliYahu, Yahuah, and Yahusha. U is the sixth letter of the Hebrew alef-beth, not the waw people have been taught. We only invite problems for ourselves if we hear the Truth, and do not receive a love for it. At that point, we will be sent a strong delusion to favor the lie (2 Thess. 2:11-12). LORD is the definition of the Hebrew word BEL, H1167, and used to replace the true Name YAHUAH (H3068) at least 6,823 times. Read the Preface of your translation, and see how the translators admit doing this.
@@Refuteitrecently one of our members of our church fell for this, her whole family followed, a friend of hers as well, now they’re trying to take more members into believing this non-sense, she visits people and brings confusion. This is why we have to be equipped with the word of God so we don’t fall for just anyone who tries to show they know so much more than you. Bringing Bible verses and names and what not. Church needs to wake up and start having a better relationship with our God, praying, fasting, reading, studying the word. Without cease. Blessings.
@LewWhite10 -- #1. YHWH is not 4 Hebrew vowels but consonants. Your insistence that YHWH are 4 vowels, is because you misunderstand what Josephus was saying in Jewish Wars, 5. 5. 7, which was his reference to the Greek transliteration of YHWH, which used 4 Greek vowels, and since Jewish Wars was in Greek, his Greek audience understood this. #2. You are wrong about the W in YHWH. Modern Hebrew has evolved the sound to a V but originally vav was a W sound, which every legitimate scholar of Hebrew understands. You are wrong about the Greek as well because the ancient Greek, like Hebrew, is derived from Phoenician and Greek had the digamma which was a W. Aramaic also has the W as well. And you are wrong about English not having a W until the invention of the printing press because English, which is a combination of Greek, Latin and Germanic languages did have a W long before the printing press as seen in the runic and as mentioned also in the Greek. You need to understand the difference between the existence of a sound and letter in a language and the later creation of a dedicated letter for a particular sound. #3. In regards to the word Lord, and translations replacing YHWH with Lord, many of the translations did so because they formerly used Jehovah in place of YHWH and the Jews use Adonai. Therefore, to be more “universal” rather than take a stance on any particular name they used “Lord” in place of YHWH. If you don’t like the fact that a particular translation did that, then don’t buy that translation. Simple solution! However, since you created and sell your own translation, and are in competition with all of these other translations that you criticize, it becomes clear why you would want to create these conspiracies and drama.
@Godisgood3789 -- Thank you for sharing that. It is true that we are seeing many more things enter churches that are attempting to steer people from the true Gospel and bring discredit to the Word of God like this nonsense with God's name. I agree with you that we need to wake up and start speaking out against these things but it appears there are too many other things churches are focused on that are more like motivational seminars than places that equip the saints.
I asked my heavenly father to help reveal this truth to me and he opened my eyes to the truth almighty Yahusha is lifted high, almighty YAHUAH is to be praised. When you worship him in spirit and truth you will see
@YAHSCHOSENFAV --- Just because you asked for something and think you got a revelation, that alleged "revelation" does not validate a fake name that never existed in the Hebrew language, has never appeared in history, never showed up in archaeological artifacts, was never in the Bible, and is grammatically incorrect. You did not hear back from the Father if you feel the revelation was the names Yahusha or YAHUAH. Therefore, that is something you need to go back and figure out, keeping in mind that God will never go against his revealed word, the Bible.
There is no letter double-u in Eberith, yet there is a reference to Yahweh commonly preferred by English teachers of the four vowels, yod-hay-uau-hay (YHUH). The form YESHUA (H3444) is found as a common word for salvation, and certainly not a word worthy of being stoned to death over. This is a noun seen as the last word in Psalm 91. The five-lettered name invented by Mushah for his assistant at Numbers 13:16 (see interlinear for proof of this) is spelled yod-hay-uau-shin-ayin, but usually seen written in the Aramith script we brought back from our captivity in Babel. YAHUSHA is the closest and simplest expression of these 5 Eberith letters. YESHUA is not the correct name for obvious reasons. All it means is "salvation." Yahusha declares "I am your Deliverer." The high priest mentioned at ZekarYah 3 was YAHUSHA, not YESHUA.
@Lew White ---There is absolutely a letter W and the W sound not only in the ancient Hebrew, but in ALL Semitic languages to include proto-semitic/proto-sinaitic. Additionally, early Egyptian hieroglyphics reveals that there was a letter W in that language as well, which the Hebrews since the time of Joseph (aka: Zaphnathpaaneah - Gen. 41:45) would have been exposed to. This is even more true about Moses, who was raised in the royal court of Egypt. Since you claim the Jews adopted the language of Babel during their captivity, would you not equally have to agree that the Hebrews also would have been exposed to and likely adopted the W from Egypt? The evidence is too overwhelming for you to deny this or to make a claim that the Hebrews had no knowledge or use of the letter W. This truth may make you and your followers uncomfortable, but it is time for you and your followers to get better resources to study. Let me just make you aware that I am familiar with your “ministry” and how you attempt to use these linguistic tricks to cause people to doubt the Bible, which then opens them up to the other more serious doctrinal errors you teach, like claiming the Christian Jesus is false and denying the deity of Christ, etc. I have also seen what you say on your website and social media when you are corrected or refuted. You like to claim how you are being persecuted by others for simply exposing false reasoning and strongholds. No. You are not exposing false reasoning and strongholds, and you are not be persecuted. I am correcting you in the hopes that you will turn away from the false teachings that you are peddling and from the spiritual damage you are causing others when they fall from truth and follow your teachings. So, don’t include me among your list of persecutors, because I have faith that you can change.
@Shanna Honea Yahuah or Yahusha do not appear in the scriptures any where. If you think those two names represent the Father and the Savior then it is time to stop listening to people that have no clue about Hebrew and begin to get correct instruction from people that know what they are talking about. **** Stop letting the ignorance of another person be your source of education **** th-cam.com/video/GpO2l3BBIPs/w-d-xo.html
@Lion of Yahudah You guys run to the Paleo Hebrew because you know that YAHUAH violates the rules of Hebrew grammar. So, to get around the rules you only use Paleo Hebrew and claim it does not have rules. See this video: th-cam.com/video/A_E4y0fzj8I/w-d-xo.html
Thanks Brother, it's very easy, what language did they wrote on top of the cross, Greek, Latin and Hebrew, All 3 wrote about Jesus, Jesus the Nazarene King of the Jews, so it was Jesus all the way until James strong who wrote Hebrew concordance in late 1860. And then Ben Yehuda's who created the Hebrew dictionary also in the late 1860, so Ben was a Jew Orthodox, and many Jewish people are against Jesus. So who do we have to believe the sign on the cross or men who had made up all these names. How far can you date Yahuaha?? Thanks Brother
Why is David pronounced "Da-veed" if that v sound is a u? Its like reading the name Wagner in German and not realizing that Vahg-ner isn't Wag-nur. Yahovah I understand. Yahuah I don't understand. David is "Davide" because the vav is a Vah sound.
Sometimes I don’t understand ! Man is the one who Changed his name. His name is Yahuah and sons name is Yahusha!. Please do your diligent research ( Lord, God, Jesus etc…) all have pagan roots, it is the belief and power that we held unto when these names were called. Please seek The most high Yahuah on this matter! Because it’s or of deception here.
@Charline Charles The only man that changed the name that you should be concerned about is the one that lied to you and told you the name of the Father is Yahuah and the Son is Yahusha. No such names exist in the scriptures or in the past. It is not rocket science. You simply need to turn to the scriptures and the names are right there in Hebrew. And, guess what? The Greek New Testament is also the inspired word and you can see the names in that language as well. Because the Father is multilingual. There are even historic accounts (before Christianity)of the names in Greek. No mystery! No paganism involved! Do the research and don't let someones ignorance of the facts and truth be your source of education.
@Lion of Yahudah That same excuse is used by multiple cults and everyone else that cannot produce proof for their doctrines. The old "they removed it from the Bible." excuse. So, let's step back for a moment a take a close look at the picture that you're trying to paint. So, you believe that the name Yahuah and Yahusha was once in the Bible (which there is zero evidence for). Then every Jew from the BC era conspired to remove those names. Then when Christianity came on the scene the Jews had a secret meeting with the Christians and asked them to join in their conspiracy to remove the names. The Christians agreed and continued to follow the Jews in removing Yahua and Yahusha from the scriptures. Then this secret agreement was so successful that it got passed down from generation to generation. Then one day, the publishers of the NIV revealed the secret in their preface. A secret that was never revealed before. A secret that has remained hidden and unknown by the majority of Christianity for over 2,000 years. But now in the 21st century, dedicated followers have re-discovered the true name and once again for the first time since the BC era, the name Yahuah and Yahusha has been restored! So, now that the name has been restored and the conspiracy that spanned multiple centuries has been exposed, we can throw out all 5,000+ Greek manuscripts of the NT, all the Septuagint manuscripts, all the Dead Sea Scroll manuscripts that contain the name, and the historic writers (both Jews and Christians) and all the archaeological evidence because you know it's all tainted and full of errors. So, would that be the summary of your conspiracy that you're trying to sell?? Because that is how it sounds and I hope you can see how beyond far fetched that whole excuse really is. So, you can continue to follow these silly ideas and the people making them up, or you can get back to reality and truly discover the teachings handed down to us from Christ and the apostles. Not teachings made up in the 21st century from the minds of people that have no clue what their talking about.
@Lion of Yahudah No one changed the names and the NIV preface does not "admit that they removed the name of Yahuah." The preface states that they use Lord in place of the YHWH, which is perfectly fine because the Septuagint (300 BC) did the same thing (Kurios=Lord and Theos=God) and so did the apostles. Are you going to blame the apostles of lying and being part of your conspiracy as well? You guys need to go back to a Bible believing and teaching church, instead of believing conspiracies based on zero evidence.
@Entime Watchmen Go look at Exodus 3:14 in Hebrew if you want to know what the creator called himself before the New Testament, then go read Exodus 3:14 in Hebrew. He said his personal name was Ehyeh Here is a video for you: th-cam.com/video/A_E4y0fzj8I/w-d-xo.html
@Peggy Russell But deliver you to where? More than likely to a place that you may not want to go if you continue to follow wrong teachings. The more you reject what is in the Bible, the further you get from truth until you will find yourself in a place you never intended to go. Come back to truth.
@Lion of Yahudah God has more than one name. Go read Exodus chapter 3. Also, you only run to the the Paleo Hebrew because you think by doing so you are not bound by Hebrew grammar rules, which would quickly debunk the name Yahuah (which is not a Hebrew name). th-cam.com/video/A_E4y0fzj8I/w-d-xo.html also see: th-cam.com/video/VE1C1e0uAF8/w-d-xo.html (this video covers Acts 4:12)
My husband and I prayed for confirmation on His Name and He Confirmed to us both that it's Yahuah and His Son Yahusha. You can believe or not I respect really no judgement.
Gods name was deliberately removed from Bible translations (some 7000 times ) and replaced with LORD or GOD. He clearly says in the Bible Exodus 3:15 "This is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations" Psalm 9:10 Those who know your name will trust in you, for you, have never forsaken those who seek you.” 6. Love His Name And much more verses that our Creator left us to know how important for Him is to us be calling Him by His Name not Titles. But again i'm coming in complete respect with this.
@karlalopez6531 --- Thank you for sharing your experience and perspective on the names. However, to be open and transparent with you, I hear the same things from others that have said the same about Yehovah and others said the exact same thing about Yahweh or a whole host of other names. So, can we really go by what we interpret God is saying to us alone or should we not confirm it by legitimate evidence as well? I appreciate that you and your husband are seeking prayer, but why not consider praying about why this is so important for you to settle on a "Hebrew name" that you must call the Father. What is so sinful or wrong about using your English language or names that are in the Bible? Why not follow the example of Christ, which told us to pray just saying Father? I have seen far too many harmed by this movement because of all the extra baggage that gets added to it, like how you are not saved unless you use the right name, or your prayers won't be answered unless you use the right name and then you get plunged into a works based salvation and sanctification system, and thus depart from Christ, putting yourself under a curse as described in Galatians.
@karlaopez6531 -- Well, respectfully, his name was not deliberately removed from the Bible. In fact, the main person who started that rumor claims the translations that allegedly did that announced it in the preface of their translation--so, not really a super-secret hidden conspiracy as that person claimed. What some translations did was to replace YHWH or Adonai from the original text with the English word Lord to make it easier for people to read. There are plenty of resources that one can go to to see what the original text actually says, so again, not a conspiracy or anything, just a decision a translation committee made for their intended audience.
@@Refuteit I understand and respect your point of view, thank you for not being disrespectful. It doesn't matter what is important to me or what is easier for me to call Him. If He wants us to call Him by His name like multiple scriptures He left for is stating it then I will ask him for the name He wants us to call him. I live for him and I will do anything to Respect Him and His name and If I prayed and not only me but my husband received the Same dream, I will honor it. But honestly I respect if you don't see it that way, what is important that we glorify the Same Elohim❤️
@@karlalopez6531Do you call your biological Father by his given name?. Or because of your relationship with him do you call him Father?.. Evrytime I come across those that push this heresy... It's always: "No one told me this name., It was revealed to me., I prayed and the Father confirmed it." ect...which is not true, you came across this name on the internet just like all those that follow this nonsense... It is obvious that none of you are testing the spirits... Like the scriptures say to do... You are no longer willing to endure sound doctrine and you are bringing a new Gospel, just as the scriptures say...
@josephfaulkner2230 -- There is nothing in any "old hebrew" anything (text, carvings, or otherwise) that pronounces YHWH or YHVH as Yahuah. Additionally, a concordance is typically based off a particular translation of the Bible or the original language, the most famous is Strongs. However, a look at Strongs shows the following: "Transliteration: Yhvh Phonetic Spelling: (yeh-ho-vaw') ---- NOT Yahuah" --AND-- A look at Brown-Driver-Briggs says: "יהוהc. 6823 i.e. יַהְוֶה proper name, of deity Yahweh, the proper name of the God of Israel" - NOT Yahuah As an added reference for you, the Encyclopedia Judaica says: “the true pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton YHWH was never lost. The name was pronounced Yahweh.” So, I don't know what you are reading, but the proper pronunciation of YHWH is not Yahuah.
@@RefuteitThank you for all your hard work, you are greatly appreciated... This nonsense drives me nuts... Please keep up the great work you do for the Kingdom...
@janineclaassens9019 --- What I do know is Hebrew, history, paleography, and the Bible. Additionally, I have debated the Yahuah/Yahusha names and many other invented sacred names since 2012. My base of "knowledge" to these names are not from TH-cam or Facebook. Therefore, it’s disappointing to see you dismiss the messenger because you’re uncomfortable with the message. This name that you're defending is a recent invention from the Hebrew Roots movement and was made up this century, and so instead of questioning the legitimacy of the Yahuah and Yahusha names, you resort to attacks on the messenger. A sad reflection on your part. Your inability to engage with the counter-evidence proves that you only heard something about the Yahuah/Yahusha names and willfully accepted it as truth without extensive verification of the "evidence" that these people presented to you, and now you are left inadequate to defend what you believe and can only at best parrot the lines of rhetoric you heard others speak. This is why it's worth taking the time to verify claims rather than blindly accepting what you’ve heard.
ZephaniYAHU Zephaniali NechemYAHU -Nchemiah ChizaiY. Hezckinh YAHUchannon Jolin Isaiah YAHU MatitYAHU Matthew ZechanYAHU Zechariah EIYAHU Yerme Y AHU Elijah Jeremiah For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ve shall sav. "Blessed is he that cometh in the name of YAHUAH" YAHU SHA NEITHER IS THERE SALVATION IN ANY OTHER: FOR THERE IS NONE OTHER NAME UNDER HEAVEN GIVEN AMONG MEN, WHEREBY WE MUST BE SAVED, ACTS 412 I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. JOHN 5:43
@Dorrie All of those prophet names were not originally spelled that way. See this video: th-cam.com/video/A_E4y0fzj8I/w-d-xo.html Acts 4:12 and John 5:43 do not mean what you think it means. See this video: th-cam.com/video/QTTjuQIUp_I/w-d-xo.html You might also be interested in this video: th-cam.com/video/VE1C1e0uAF8/w-d-xo.html
Apparently the NT was written in aramaic (sister lang to hebrew) but was destroyed by the romans. Apparently it makes sense that it was in Aramaic as some translations in koine greek make no sense as the meaning is of hebrew/aramaic originally and only makes sense when explained in that way. It would make sense as they burned a rabbis including haninah teradion for using the true name of our heavenly father and teaching the OT (torah). Yet you think YaH appointed the holy scriptures to them? If they could have destroyed the original torah no doubt they would have but it was too late at that point. It was already sacred before the romans even knew about YaH. Just saying.
@Faith And what you are saying is a lot of speculation, historic inaccuracies, and Dan Brown "Da Vinci Code" like fiction. The evidence is overwhelming and undeniable that the NT was originally written in Greek. The Romans did not travel around the world and destroy every NT text. The NT was not written in Hebrew nor was it written in Aramaic. th-cam.com/video/ikKATvRXL8s/w-d-xo.html
It certainly cannot be Jesus… the letter, J, was not invented until the year 1524 CE. NO word nor name in ANY language of ALL the world began with the letter,J. The pagan name Jesus, means , inferior , substandard, in Hreek. YAHUAH/YAHUSHA means “ l am the deliverer.” In Paleo Hebrew. HIS REAL NAME IS; Ayah Ashar Ayah! “ l Am whom I Am”
So what if the letter J was a later invention? Languages evolve and change. The J sound has been in the English language for centuries prior and used other letters/characters to symbolize the sound. By the way, the letter J was not invented in 1524, because the letter J is in the 1382 Wycliffe Bible, which means that letter J was familiar to people and used prior to that date. You make the same error as do most sacred namers like you, by using this English letter J argument to elevate Hebrew names. English and Hebrew are two different languages, with different grammar, and letters. Stop using Hebrew to demonize English. If English is so demonic and pagan as you claim, then why are you using it to type your comments?
I keep seeing Yehuah and Yahusha and they just don't sit well with me. I pray the Lord to open the eyes of my understanding and let the truth rise like Joseph's wheat and lies fall down like tares.
Same. I thino. Coz we grew up praying in the name of Jesus to God our Father. But we never really used God's name isnt it. I think it would make God very happy if wr cannuse His name. Coz there are many gods out there. But we serve the one true living God.
@Gasper Forever--- Where in the Bible does it mandate that every believer must speak Hebrew? Can you find that passage? To say that everyone must perfectly speak Hebrew to properly say God's name is found nowhere in the Bible. Therefore, why do you put a burden on yourself that is not biblical only because you are listening to people that want to put you under spiritual slavery and under their teachings? God created you to live in the nation you live and to speak the language that you speak: "From one man he created all the nations throughout the whole earth. He decided beforehand when they should rise and fall, and he determined their boundaries." (Acts 17:26) and it is God that put various languages in the mouth of the people. There is nothing wrong with speaking to God in the language you were destined to be born under.
@@Refuteit This. When the Lord confused the languages at Babel, all the people who prayed to Him in their new language (that they had zero input in creating), prayed to Him. How could He be offended, since He was the one who changed their language? As people moved, over the years, language changes. At one point, Hebrew was a dead language! The name of Jesus or Yeshua or Yehusha, as long as we are talking about the one born of a virgin, died for our sins, conquered death, rose the third day, and is the only son of Creator God, we will be ok. I cannot think that the years I spent praying to Jesus were wasted, because it brought me to Torah. The whole Word. The LORD God knows who are His and will keep them, no matter what language they speak.
The name of Jesus has delivered me time and time again. I mean, I was in thy throws of life and death in the realm of it spirit and the name Jesus Christ saved me by breaking whatever demonic hold was over me. Jesus Christ aka Yeshua Hamashiac is it. I'm
Like you, I have had a video clearly showing the fallacies and grammatical impossibility of the very new appearance of the pronunciation "Yahusha." I can't help but notice that your comments are also filled with blind ignorance trying to defend a position with absolutely zero evidence or support from anywhere. This flawed pronunciation is perpetrated by those who know next to nothing about Hebrew grammar, deny the written historical evidence and continue causing confusion among the body of Mashiach.
Psalms 68:4 KJV show JAH but the letter J didn’t exist back the till 400-500 years ago nor is there a J sound or letter J in Hebrew, in the NKJV it says YAH Psalms 68:4 Isaiah 12:2,4. 26:4. 38:11
First of all, you do know that English is not the same as Hebrew, correct? So, when one language (Hebrew) is translated into another language (English) the finished text will have different sounds, letters, and words. Also, how they spoke in 1611 is not how we speak today. Second, languages adapt and change over the years. In old English Father used to be Faeder. Is that how you say it today? So, your point about how the language added letters to tie it to an exclusive sound rather than sharing a letter for multiple sounds is meaningless. Finally, your point is also incorrect, because there actually always was a J sound in English and even a previous symbol for the J sound which goes back to the 2nd or 4th century AD proto-English. Even the Wycliffe Bible that goes back to 1382 (641 years ago) is filled with the letter J. Symbols for sounds in languages come and go, like the ancient Greek Digamma for the W / Waw sound as an example. Stop believing the lies people are spreading about the Bible, about biblical languages, and about the English language.
@@RefuteitI just want to say you are honestly contending for the Faith! God promised to preserve his Word for us and so many people has been set free by the name Jesus. God does not expect everyone one to learn Hebrew.
@nganungmanghilabotmangyudu6117 --- Oh really? Then let's put your claim to the test. Pronounce this ("Влади́мир") in English just the way you read it, and remember, like you claim, this "shall be called as it is" without translating it and without looking it up online or putting it through GOOGLE TRANSLATE. Since I know you are still going to look it up, try to pronounce it like a native speaker, see how easy that goes for you. When you are ready to give up, here is a video to show you that your point is wrong. th-cam.com/video/_02dwYFZBKM/w-d-xo.html
The ONLY inspired language and alphabet is Paleo Hebrew. ALL other languages are pagan and inadequate and distorted and inferior , substandard to the original Hebrew.
We just made a video to address your statement. Paleo Hebrew is not an "inspired language" and all other languages are not pagan. Watch this video and learn why your statement is wrong: th-cam.com/video/cupaB0rGtGU/w-d-xo.html
@user-mt4ml6cj5j -- So, switch roles and provide five compelling reasons the name of Yahusha is false. I would like to read about your better way to do it.
My spirit tells me Yahusha is fake also, where's the fruit of those who worship him? Also look at them trying to use fear, mocking, shame and guilt to silence you. A true christian wouldn't do that. This is another way of the devil to idolize a specific name and sow discord among believers of christian doctrines. Jesus Christ will always be attacked, for he is the Light in this world.
The name doesn’t bear fruit .. “ I come in my Father's name" is a quote from the Bible, John 5:43. The verse continues, "and you do not receive me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him" Everyone knows the name Jesus but J doesn’t exist in hebrew though he spoke Hebrew ??? His name had to be Hebrew it’s a fact along with the verse His name would have to be similar with his fathers name Yahuah and Yahusha the son and if someone else comes in his own name you will receive him everyone accepts Jesus will accept him further more The Name Jesus Christ is associated with Christmas and every other holiday which is paganism smh The creator can be associated with Sin ….. break down the name Je sus and the meaning
@tayafrieson6294 --- It would really be nice if individuals like yourself would first view all of the content (videos) on a channel prior to commenting or at least read the previous comments, so that I would not have to address the repetitive rhetoric made by the Yahuah pandemonium. All of the things that you presented have been debunked (John 5:43, the letter J, his name supposedly having to be the same as his Fathers name, and the allegation that Jesus means something derogatory, etc, etc.) So, I invite you to grab a coffee, relax, and watch some of the playlists on the channel related to the topic. I recommend you start with this one: th-cam.com/play/PLqgWCG_xu-1auflm8g0pVu4sbHUB5CY_D.html Then watch this one: th-cam.com/play/PLqgWCG_xu-1bMBVI94S7iDxHtquZ4FJCJ.html
@Stella Sounds like you didn't watch the video. Whoever sold you the lie that Yahusha is the name of the Savior, is actually the one bringing you a different Gospel and Paul said if anyone does that, they are cursed.
@Stella G So, let's analyze this for a moment. So, you deny (1) Over 2,000 years of church history discussing the name (2) Deny over 5,000 Greek New Testament manuscripts (3) Deny the Greek Septuagint which we have BC Era textual evidence for showing the name (4) Deny very early Aramaic text with the name (5) Deny non-Christians writers that wrote out the names in both Hebrew and Greek (6) Deny the Masoretic vowel points (7) and you look past the fact that not once do we ever see the name Yahusha in scripture, text, or history. (because the name was manufactured in the 21st century from a persons mind). However, despite all your denial of this truth and mountain of evidence, you still say I am the one on dangerous grounds?? I don't think debunking false teachings and lies puts me on dangerous grounds. I think the person that turns away from the truth, the mountain of evidence, some of which I mentioned above, puts a person on dangerous grounds. "For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will TURN THEIR EARS AWAY FROM THE TRUTH and turn aside to myths." 2 Timothy 4:3-4
@Lion of Yahudah There is no hypocrisy. The name of Jesus in Hebrew does appear in Hebrew, Aramaic, and in Greek in numerous text. And, the name is not what you guys claim it is. That's the point I was making.
@Endtime Watchmen You are right. There are some Hebrew letters that work as both vowels and constants and become either depending on the context. However, the name of Yahuah violates the rules of Hebrew grammar. Hebrew syllables need both vowels and constants, so a name cannot be all vowels. The four vowels is something you obviously are borrowing from Josephus, who made that claim. However, even if the YHWH are all vowels, that still does not equal YAHUAH. You still need constants in each syllable.
@Soho Divinci And Iesous Christos (A real name for the Savior that you can actually find in the Bible) loves you and would like you to discover the truth, rather than follow error.
@@RefuteitRespectfully Yahusha is not error. What if that is his real name and you called it an error. Again, respectfully we need to watch our words for he’ll judge our words in the last days if we don’t repent. We all need to grow in our knowledge and stop judging against each other instead we supposed to love each other especially in this time of seeking his truth including his Holy Name.
@sanalouis2620 --- I disagree that it is not an error as you believe, and I say that based off of facts and not opinion. The name Yahuah never existed prior to the 21st century. The name was invented from within the modern Hebrew Roots movement. So, not only is it an error, but it is a modern human invention. I can tell you have not yet gone deep into the abyss of the Yahuah cult by your avatar which is a cross. The cross is taboo for any one using the name of Yahuah and is seen as a pagan symbol. Therefore, I hope there is still time to rescue you from the errors of that movement. I suggest you watch this playlist (every video) and confirm everything stated for yourself. th-cam.com/play/PLqgWCG_xu-1auflm8g0pVu4sbHUB5CY_D.html
Then you are following an unknown / False Messiah, because there is no such person in the Bible with that name or in the history of the Body of Christ. If you have fallen for that, what else have you fallen for? I invite you to rediscover the truth, return back to the teachings of the Bible and learn about the true Messiah.
@Refuteit you don't know what your talking about. Hebrew yod hey waw hey. W in the tetragrammaton makes the sound U like in food or rude. Yhuh is correct. W is is 2 U's hence double u or a long oo sound. Do research before you insert your foot in your mouth. Repent of your idols.
@Pr1nce4of4Peace4 --- So, let me get this straight: you think I should disregard the over 50 scholarly sources I gathered that confirm the Waw was pronounced as [w] in classical Biblical Hebrew? Is that what you’re suggesting? Should I also overlook the fact that Yemenite Jews have preserved this classic W sound, just as other Semitic languages did? And what about the fundamental grammatical rules of both classic biblical and modern Hebrew that clearly show you can't construct a name like "Yahuah"? Should I simply toss aside the substantial archaeological evidence pointing to the vocalization of "Yahweh"? Are you really serious in suggesting that I abandon all this in favor of chasing after self-proclaimed Hebrew experts from the Yahuah cult? Is that the path you would have me "research"-regurgitating the same tired mantras parroted in some Yahuah teacher's video? No, thank you! I choose to stick with the legitimate experts. I'd rather not walk in ignorance, bolstered by unwarranted confidence in those who cling to delusions while dismissing the truth. You have nothing factual or substantial to offer that would sway me to adopt a 21st century invented name that came out of the Hebrew roots movement. May Christ open your eyes to see and cause your ears to hear the truth and may he remove the hardness of your heart that has you despising the traditional teachings of Christianity, as given to us by the apostles. Amen!
Now I am even more confused. What if I believe the wrong thing and disappoint Yahuah/YHWH The Elohim of the Bible. All I want is to make HIM proud to follow the one true God and thank HIM for Yeshua/Yahusha for dying for my sins. I am not at the point I am literally scared of using names.
@C31living --- The fact that you feel that fear and bondage over this subject is evidence that you are listening to teachings or conversations that are not of God and discussions that are putting you under condemnation. "For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind." 2 Timothy 1:7 "There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit...For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father....Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered... And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God." Romans 8:1, 15, 26-27 Do you see anything in that passage about if you don't get the name right God will not hear you as these sacred namers claim? The passage says that the Spirit of God will intercede on your behalf, does it not? So, why put yourself under fear? The Gospel message of the scriptures is not to put you under fear and condemnation like others want you to be under, by demanding you speak their magical mantra and live under the Mosaic covenant to please God as one of their "Natsarim." The message of the Gospel is that Christ lifted condemnation off of you and placed you in a position that you don't have to fear for your salvation and sanctification because you are not good enough. Why? Because no one is good enough to satisfy the demands of God's holiness. If they could please God by their performance then there would have been no need for Christ to come on our behalf. "Salvation is not a reward for the good things we have done, so none of us can boast about it." Ephesians 2:9 "I do not treat the grace of God as meaningless. For if keeping the law could make us right with God, then there was no need for Christ to die." Galatians 2:21 "He saved us, not by the righteous deeds we had done [like saying a certain name or following the mosaic covenant, or by becoming a member of the Natsarim cult], but according to His mercy, through the washing of new birth and renewal by the Holy Spirit." Titus 3:5 "For they [the Jews] don’t understand God’s way of making people right with himself. Refusing to accept God’s way, they cling to their own way of getting right with God by trying to keep the law." Romans 10:3 Therefore, your fear is because of your focus is on your performance and if your performance will save you and keep you saved and be accepted by God. That is something you can never do for yourself. That is why it is not based on you being good enough for God or saying his name right, but solely on what Christ has done for you. Stop listening to the lies of these Judaizers and legalistic cults. Cast off the lies of this Yahuah cult and ignore them. They are the type of people spoken about in the scriptures. "They are the kind who work their way into people’s homes and win the confidence of vulnerable women who are burdened with the guilt of sin and controlled by various desires." 2 Timothy 3:6 Instead embrace the love, mercy and grace of God through Christ. Allow the Holy Spirit to infuse you with the love of God. "No fear exists where his love is. Rather, perfect love gets rid of fear, because fear involves punishment. The person who lives in fear doesn’t have perfect love." 1 John 4:18 And through his love you will experience the fullness of the life God offers and will live in the life that pleases him as his daughter being led by the Spirit. Here is another video you may want to watch: th-cam.com/video/vh1dECJM678/w-d-xo.html
Our Fathe who art in Heaven, hallowed by thy name... Even Jesus never called God by name. Our God wants to be called Father, because he is our Father. Ofc he knows who you are praying to. He is not dumb. Pray to the Father, through the Son by the Holy Spirit.
@Jellow Kellow --- Do I believe that all the Sabbaths, festivals, and dietary laws were a shadow but Christ is the reality (Colossians 2)? Yes. Do I believe that God has now established a "new” covenant, making the first one obsolete (Hebrews 8:13)? Yes. Do I believe this is a covenant not of written laws, but of the Spirit (2 Corinthians 3:6). Yes. Do I believe the righteous requirement of the law are fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh or letter of the law but according to the Spirit (Romans 8:4). Yes. Do I believe salvation, sanctification, or holiness is earned by obedience to the Mosaic law? No. (Galatians 3). Am I outside of God's law? No. I am under the law of Christ (1 Corinthians 9:21) What is the law of Christ? (Galatians 5 & 6).
@@RefuteitI admire your work my brother, you are definitely apart of the body of Christ! ☝🏽I feel sorry for these lost individuals blatantly ignoring the truth.
@ekluksdahl --- The answer is in your question, "mosaic" law which is also know as the "written code" (Romans 7:6) the "ministry of death" carved on stone (2 Corinthians 3:7) which is the law and covenant that Moses received and Israel followed (2 Corinthians 3) We are now under a New Covenant with greater glory than the Mosaic Law/Covenant. We are under a covenant led by the Spirit which empowers us and is not based on our self-effort, but on faith and grace. So that we are now people that avoid the ways that lead to death and destruction (aka: sin). Read 2nd Corinthians chapter 3 in your favorite translation for more detail. The Mosaic law/covenant has expired and we are now under a new way made available through Christ.
Its funny how the yashua cult rushed in to replace the name above all names, clearly translated, yet they're say some other name in vain. There are people coming into churches and saying BOTH names after they pray, what an abomination. There was a jewish lady that died in Israel and she was rushed to the hospital. When she recovered she was clearly distraught and she approached one of her coworkers and said that she was very confused because when she was gone, she left her body and she said she saw JESUS, then she began to cry. She said that very name. She was confused because in her OWN WORDS "I'm a jew and we are taught to HATE Jesus", to NEVER say that name and to refer to him by a derogatory slur. His name is the LORD, JESUS CHRIST. For there is ONE name under heaven by which you are save, the name above every name, JESUS CHRIST.
@partysimpson5154 --- That is actually the Hebrew/Aramaic name that has the most evidence. However, it becomes "bad" if you demand others only use that name as a legalistic requirement or go around telling people God will not hear them when they pray or they cannot be saved unless they use that name, as so many sacred namers do. That is the nonsense we refute on this channel along with the pride and Gnosticism of pushing secret knowledge and magical mantras to reach God. So, if Yeshua is the name you use for yourself, then that is fine.
@@Refuteit Paul, a pronounced Hebrew scholar and the most learned and astute of his day wrote the name of the person that knocked him off his horse and struck him blind, Iesus. Written in HIS own hand. If the name was this Yiddish invention, I'm sure someone who KNEW him....like say, his BROTHER James, would have corrected everyone. I've heard the excuses for why we all need to pronounce it "correctly" and they're all bunk. It ONLY his name that want change. They say things "there was no "J" in the Hebrew alphabet...but curiously they don't want to be called Yews, or Yuda, or Yeremiah. And assuming we're all playing this new game, "Yoshua" or "Joshua, is the false messiah the "YEWS" are waiting for and think that if they build the 3rd temple (which will NEVER happen) that he's magically appear. It's astonishing how easy it is to TEST this but it's even MORE astonishing how virtue signaling everyone is what it comes to this.
@TheCountofToulouse --- You raise great points that I have said similarly to others about how easy it is to just look in the New Testament and see what is in the Greek and then to understand that Latin and English is how we pronounce that name in our vernacular. It is not rocket science. However, people can't do that because they despise anything other than Hebrew, to include the Greek New Testament. I also like how you bring up "virtue signaling" because that is a lot of what I see as well. They want to join either the Yahuah group or the Yahweh group or the Yehovah group and then look down on others, divide, and argue how they are far more enlightened than the rest. These are the games that need to end. I also agree that this Third Temple hysteria and claims that sacrifices will be re-introduced is not a good thing considering the message of the Gospel. There are not two ways to salvation, one for the Jews and another for gentiles as some teach. I have a new video coming out soon to escalate the refute of all this sacred name cult nonsense, so please be on the watch.
@JohnSmith-bm6zg --- I am glad you came. I hope you received the information you were looking for and it has helped you find truth on this subject and others that may be on your heart and mind. Continue to watch other videos as well.
@Dave Messenger Run to who? There is no such person in the Bible or history with that name. Yet, I have numerous historic accounts giving the correct pronunciation in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic, going into the first century AD and BC era.
@Lion of Yahudah Calm down. people on this channel are smart enough to see that you are in fact not providing proof, you are spewing out unsubstantiated rhetoric that you are parroting from books and videos from a guy that invented Yahuah and Yahusha in the 21st century.
@Lion of Yahudah You need to know the difference between opinion and facts. Your statement that the entire Bible was written in Paleo Hebrew is your opinion, it is not fact. The Bible was written in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. Additionally, the point of the Septuagint being an additional and useful resource is because it is a Greek translation of the Old Testament that was not based on the Masoretic Hebrew, but on a much older Hebrew text. It was also the Old Testament used by the apostles and early church. And, even though the Septuagint is a much older text, it still does not support your false teachings or false names, but actually debunks your opinions. Finally, Christianity is not based on the religion of Roman Catholicism. That again, is your opinion based on speculation supported by zero facts. Anyone that spent a small amount of reading in the New Testament could clearly see that Christianity pre-dates the Catholic Church. I suggest you spend more time reading the New testament.
@Endtime Watchmen All your evidence is nothing more than the tetragrammaton (YHWH). That is not evidence that the pronunciation is YAHUAH. In fact, I know it is not Yahuah because it violates Hebrew grammar rules. I also know it is not Yahuah based on Exodus chapter 3. th-cam.com/video/A_E4y0fzj8I/w-d-xo.html
Our Lord is omnicient and knows our hearts even if we by error use the wrong pronunciation of His name. As for those making up names that are not even in the original scriptures, please go study biblical Hebrew. Yahusha is not a Hebrew word or name. It is made up and used by people operating in the spirit of anti-Christ to bring confusion and division to God's people. Do as the Word commands, "study to show yourself approved".
For additional Content on this subject please see the following videos: th-cam.com/video/zHVlDaxheD8/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/iCS36vDeJIA/w-d-xo.html
@Dorrie You are right, the KJV did remove books. The 1611 KJV had the Apocrypha in it all the way til 1828, and then it was removed. And of course the Messiah is Hebrew, he is also the Savior that died so that the world can be saved, which includes the people of every tribe, nation, and language. He does not demand the world take Hebrew lessons before they come to him to be saved.
@Endtime Watchmen I am already familiar with Steven Rudd's website. And his archaeological work in Israel. You should continue reading more of his site. I am pretty sure he would join me in debunking what you are teaching.
Im also faced with this concern as im being told not pray in the name of Jesus. 🤦🏻♀️ I was also told that the word God is not good. I cant weite😔that here
Don't listen to people that tell you the word of God is not good or those that condemn you for praying in English and using the name of Jesus. They are all false teachers. For centuries believers have used the name of Jesus and now all of a sudden in these last days you have false teachers condemning a name the church has used successfully for generations.
@@Refuteit thank you.. I was actually praying in the name if Yahusha this week. I felt i was adressing thr Son of God. But still i have my doubts. Its so true all this is coming up esp in the last days howveer🙄years ago ive seen various ppl talk abt this too. Hope ita fine i write this hear, i was told tjat the name Jesus was purposely added taking out Yahusha bcoz in Latin it meant ( I cannot say it..... 😔) I was shocked. But i also wondered why the original name of our Father God and Jesus was changed. Other religions dont change in most languages same name. Only our Saviour. 😢
The best thing you can do is to stop listening to these people that have no clue what they are talking about when it comes to the name of God. Their stories and rewrite of history are very wrong. They portray God as a tyrant that demands everyone speak Hebrew or go to hell for praying in a non-Hebrew language. There is no such doctrine found in the scriptures. In fact, God has used several languages to get his message out to the world.
I forgive you for your accusations! I refuse to assume anyone to be an antichrist over a disagreement! HE says to love one another! Disagreeing with someone is not considered to be hateful!! GOD is a witness to my efforts to understand HIM more deeply!!
@davidelliott8747 --- If you are advocating for people to see the New Testament as full of error or not the original text, or any similar conspiracy theory, then that is more than just a disagreement about a doctrine. If you are advocating for people to follow a man or a movement that will teach things counter to what we find in scripture, then that is more than a disagreement. So, let's not candy coat what you are implying or play victim. There is no such name as Yahuah and the New testament was originally written in Greek and is reliable in preserving the original message of God.
It was Yeshua or Yehoshua…..I am messianic and hold to to the truth of scripture. We keep a real sabbath and do go along with the Catholic Church that worships the sun God…..but I also can’t stand the sacred namer cult stuff. I came to know YHWH via Sunday church and Jesus BUT it is very wrong and corrupted. The word of God can be trusted, but it’s been twisted. Anyway, I like this video because the ya-HU-sha stuff really bugs me.
@Stella This is our ministry channel, so whenever someone makes a comment, we reserve the right to comment as needed. We make that determination, you don't. If you cannot agree to that, then you can make your comments on another channel.
@Lion of Yahudah As stated previously, this is our ministry channel and it is our right to respond to whatever comment. No one has the right to come on our channel and tell us we can't comment.
@@SuperUnknown905 why does it matter SO MUCH to have the proper pronunciation??? Why does salvation hinge on being able to say his name perfectly? That’s not biblical.
@JB-ot5eu --- False! Stop listening to these people online that know nothing about Hebrew and are making up myths about the name of God and the Hebrew language. Here is Dr. Michael Brown, which is a scholar of ancient Semitic languages and he debunks this nonsense about inhaling and exhaling God's name. th-cam.com/users/clipUgkx4cLcWvs8YDAIcn-lFTFxjlyOybfAaWXn?si=Z7pjByXNPkAOHh3d
Don't let anyone confuse you with their false doctrines, stick to the word of God and attend a church that will confirm everything they teach is from the word of God.
Beware of this “yahuah”, “Yahshua” nonsense for the record, once again, THERE IS NO SUCH NAME AS YAHSHUA. It didn’t exist in biblical times and it has not existed as a genuine Hebrew name in history - until people who really didn’t understand Hebrew made it up, thinking that it somehow restored the “Yah” element (from “Yahweh”) into the Savior’s name. there’s no such either as Yahushua - Joshua was pronounced ye-ho-shu-ah - and God’s name was NEVER pronounced Yahua or the like.
@Gasper Forever --- Genes Kim is wrong if that is what he is teaching. There is strong evidence that Yahweh is the correct pronunciation of God's name in Hebrew. The other names by the sacred namers (yahu, Yahusha, etc.) are fake and without historic and linguistic evidence.
I am so glad I found your channel. I heard this woman speaking on a you tube video claiming the lie that I had to use Yahusha. All I know is this, she is wrong, not because I am learned, scholarly, smart, just one thing. I had a child like innocent faith and needed a healing. I asked God to heal me in Jesus name. Jesus came to me and I was healed by his name, JESUS CHRIST OF NAZARETH. Just the name I had a life changing encounter with Jesus. He is not dead, HE IS ALIVE, Jesus came to me and healed me. HE IS THE SON OF GOD and the Bible is true. So I knew the woman teaching that only Yahusha was then name to use was wrong, but YOURS is the first explanation of why. I thank God for your channel.
JESUS is less than 500 years old, yet highly accepted. It mean nothing at best - by sounds suspiciously similar to "the horse" to someone familiar with Hebrew. There is no letter double-u in Eberith, yet there is a reference to Yahweh commonly preferred by English teachers of the four vowels, yod-hay-uau-hay (YHUH). The form YESHUA (H3444) is found as a common word for salvation, and certainly not a word worthy of being stoned to death over. This is a noun seen as the last word in Psalm 91. The five-lettered name invented by Mushah for his assistant at Numbers 13:16 (see interlinear for proof of this) is spelled yod-hay-uau-shin-ayin, but usually seen written in the Aramith script we brought back from our captivity in Babel. YAHUSHA is the closest and simplest expression of these 5 Eberith letters. YESHUA is not the correct name for obvious reasons. All it means is "salvation." Yahusha declares "I am your Deliverer." The high priest mentioned at ZekarYah 3 was YAHUSHA, not YESHUA.
@Lew White --- Really Lew? Are you really going to keep using these sacred namer urban myths to bash the name of Jesus? First, I have to say, so what if the name of Jesus is 200, 500 or a 1,000 years old? What does that matter? It’s true that English is a new language in comparison to many other languages, but does that make it unholy? If that is how you feel, then stop using English and only speak and write in Paleo-Hebrew. Also, keep in mind that the Holy Spirit allowed people to hear about the wonders of God in their native language - multiple languages (Acts 2:5-12). God used their own language to reach them, not Hebrew! A scriptural debunk against your claim that only Hebrew is supreme or that we need to only speak in Hebrew to get right with God. Second, I am sure that you are aware that Jesus is English (not Hebrew), which is derived from the early Greek and later Latin to English (Iesus --- see the similarity? Jesus - Iesus), so why use Hebrew to interpret its meaning? The origin of Jesus is from the original Greek New Testament. You know, all those inspired books written by the apostles and early followers of Christ in Greek, for the Greek speaking world at that time. Third, Jesus does not mean horse in Hebrew. Horse in Hebrew is “soos” not Jesus. All you are doing is playing a game by taking the word from one language and trying to match it with some sound in Hebrew for the purposes of discrediting the meaning behind that name. That is childish Lew! I could easily play that same childish game with your name as well, because Lew is “suspiciously similar” to “if” (lu) in Hebrew. You know, as in you are an “iffy” person, aka a person with dubious authentication. Do you see how your name game works when it is applied to you, Lew? Not so great or funny anymore, is it? Fourth, regardless of what you claim. There is no one ever mentioned in the Bible with the name Yahusha. You will not find a legitimate ancient text with that name. Joshua was pronounced: ye-ho-shu-ah, not yod-hay-uau-shin-ayin. Yahusha is a modern fabricated word that you perpetuate and is actually a blasphemy. So, you can continue to ignore all of the volumes of scholarly articles, books, and native speakers that apply the correct pronunciation of biblical names, but what does that say about your character? I have many verses I could quote about stubbornness and about those who refuse correction and instruction for you to read.
@@Refuteit We can not make a fake uninspired name receive our attention. The source of Truth the inspired Hebrew. JESUS has no meaning, and many Christian pastors have said so in recent years; it only tracks to the mid 16th century. Teachers have to resort to Greek, which is a translation (therefore not inspired), and Greek cannot transliterate the true Name Yahusha, having no way to sound "SH." It also adds an ending S to the fake name to make it masculine, according to the rules of Greek. Calling on the Name Yahusha was forbidden because of the YAH component in it. YESHUA is a common Hebrew word for "salvation," and no one would be arrested and stoned for saying that. Look at the interlinear of Numbers 13:16 to see the first use of the name YAHUSHA, which Mushah called his assistant HUSHA. Use inspired Hebrew, not uninspired Greek and Latin to teach, and words will make sense. YAHUSHA has a meaning, but JESUS has no meaning in any language. It is most probable that Inigo Loyola S.J. made JESUS a popular word, since he named his sect after the IESU form in the Latin Vulgate, "SOCIETAS IESU." Expose the error of the Jesuits, please don't promote their false teachings.
@ Lew White - (1) For the second time, Jesus is the English version of Iesus, which appears in the inspired Greek New Testament multiple times. If you don’t like the fact that the apostles wrote in Greek, then you need to get over it, because that is the language God used to reach the world and to spread the Gospel. The world did not speak Hebrew, they spoke Greek, the common language of that era, and God wanted to ensure the world heard the good news about Jesus Christ in a language they understood. (2) I don’t know what “Christian Pastors” you are listening to, but who cares if modern Christian pastors speak negative about the name of Jesus and claim it has no meaning. They must be ignorant of history and the development of the English language. My question to you is , why do you hate and attack the English language so much? You speak English but you bash it. (3) So what if ancient Greek speakers could not pronounce a Hebrew name the same as a Hebrew speaker. Why is it important for you to make a big deal about that? Do you think we all need to say some secret Hebrew code to enter heaven or God will rejects us? Does the world need to learn Hebrew to be saved? If you believe any of that then you do not know the love and true nature of God. Let me repeat to you what I have previously shared, which you must have ignored. In Acts chapter 2, the Holy Spirit did not use Hebrew to reach people. The Holy Spirit reached people by allowing them to hear about the wonders of God in their own native language. Not one language, but multiple languages were used to reach each person. Additionally, listen to the end time message of the Elders in heaven as recorded in the Book of Revelation chapter 5 verse 9. They offer praise to Christ for redeeming people from every language (tongue) tribe and nation---not just those that speak Hebrew. Your obsession with Hebrew being the only holy language is legalistic and biblical history proves that God does not share your opinion since he has used many languages to save the world. Your obsession with Hebrew is unbiblical. (4) Funny how you are a non-native Hebrew speaker, trying to tell Hebrew speakers and Semitic language experts how to speak Hebrew. You make up “Hebrew names” that do not and have not existed and you make up grammatical rules for a language you do not speak, yet somehow you are comfortable elevating yourself as a Hebrew language expert. (5) For your information, the “Yah” element that you mentioned, does not work the way you think it does in regards to a Hebrew name. Therefore, what you claim about the Hebrew name for Joshua and Jesus is far from accurate. There were many people in the Bible with the name Yeshua and the Greek equivalent of that name is seen as well. I have over 5,000 Greek New Testament text, the Septuagint, and the Peshitta to back up what I know. Your evidence is non-existent. (6) You say that Jesus has no meaning in any language? LOL!! The world does not share your opinion. Multiple people from around the world call out to Jesus in prayer in their native tongue. Do an internet search on the name for Christ to see how many use the name of Jesus in their language and you will see multiple languages use that same English name or a close representative of that name. Is God who wants all the world to be saved going to reject these people because they don’t say the secret name that you invented? The answer is no! God will hear these people who simply cry out in their own native language, calling up the name of the savior they know, which died for their sins. Daniel 7:14 states that Jesus will be given a dominion, glory, and a kingdom, and that all people, nations and LANGUAGES will serve him. In this future kingdom, Jesus does not make everyone speak Hebrew. Jesus is comfortable with people speaking a foreign language in his kingdom. (7) Wow! You can’t give up these sacred namer urban myths, can you? So, now your claim is that the Jesuits made the name of Jesus popular. LOL! Let me prove how silly that statement is. The name of Jesus appears in the Wyciffe Bible, which dates back to 1382 AD and the Jesuits were founded over 150 years later. So, the name of Jesus was popular long before the Jesuits, thus debunking your sacred namer urban myth. Please don't respond by just repeating yourself. I am not going to waste my time saying the same thing to your over and over again because you only have a limited number of points to make to support your claims.
Look again yesshua followers Read the first chapter of the Bible it says the word was and it was god, and I’m orthdox and I call him Jesus not some kind of funny name repent kids.
@DoBetterAndDoMore --- So, is that the excuse you're telling yourself as to why you dismiss the message of the video? #1) Your faith should not be based on the words of any human, but rather on the word of God. "And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God." (1 Corinthians 2:4-5) #2) By claiming you only believe things when you actually see and hear a person speak, is a likely indicator that you accept truth based on the charisma of the speaker and how that person makes you feel (goosebump theology), rather than biblical truth. Remember, the Bible tells us "but test everything; hold fast what is good." (1 Thessalonians 5:21) #3) Funny how you can watch an entire video (if you did at all) and not have any comment relevant to the scriptural discussions, historic content, and grammatical explanations. No! Let's not talk about all the relevant biblical stuff, let's instead talk about how you dismiss everything because you dislike how the video was produced. Yet, you probably accepted everything in a cheaply made video with a guy talking nonsense and playing a guitar at the end (hint). "Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment." (John 7:24)
@SModex777 ---- So are you saying it is impossible for God to plan how his message is to be sent around the world? # 1. The entire Old Testament was translated into Greek and distributed around the world in time for the all the New Testament writers to quote from it (as they did) and for Jews around the world (who spoke Greek) to use it as well, rather than the Hebrew. #2. There is ZERO evidence that the original New Testament was written in Hebrew, Aramaic, or any other language other than Greek, there may have been translations after the original writings but Greek was what the New Testament writers used because the world (even Jews) understood Greek, so it was the best language to use to spread the Gospel. These are all facts proven by historic and physical evidence. Do the research from ***credible sources*** and you will see the truth for yourself.
@SModex777 --- Just because you want something to be true, that does not make it true. Just because you convinced yourself that you are right, that does not make you right. Just because you don't like the truth, that does not give you the right to change the truth, based on your opinions alone. You say, "Just because there might be zero evidence of something doesn’t make it not true." So, will you accept that same logic when you are convicted of something in a court of law? Would you be okay with a judge telling you the government does not have evidence against you, but we don't need evidence because we still think you did it? Even worst, what if you had a ton of evidence that you are innocent and the government had zero evidence, but they still tell you "Just because there might be zero evidence of something doesn’t make it not true." Would you accept that answer and go happily off to jail? Why would you make a stand on opinion and speculation that has zero evidence, to fight against a well established truth that has a mountain of evidence that confirms the truth? Should that not cause you to take a pause, search your heart and test what you think is true? You said, "make sure not to give false information and say it’s factual." Well, I think you should take your own advice and do it. Scripturally, by doing what you are doing, that is defined as a sin, "You shall not spread a false report." Exodus 23:1 Study the facts and evidence from reliable sources. Heed the scriptures that tell you to "reject foolish and ignorant speculation..." 2 Timothy 2:23
@SModex777 --- I usually do not support the promotion of other videos in comments, but I did view the videos you mentioned. However, I saw no difference from what they were saying in their videos about the name of God in comparison to any other sacred namer's video. The first video used all the same silly arguments like the name of Jesus means earth pig, and that if you travel your name is always the same in every country, that the "us" is Greek points to Zeus. However, the guy tried to have it both ways by saying "I am not saying this, BUT...." All comical stuff that has been debunked over and over again. In the second video, I was trying to figure out the guys approach because he would cite resources, but those resources actually disagreed with his points. I didn't get that part. However, most of his video was nonsense because all he was doing was showing the constants for the name Joshua while displaying his version of the name on the screen and saying "look it says Yahushua" "Look here is the Dead Sea scrolls with the name Joshua and it says, Yahushua!" My response is NO, you are showing the constants of the name and just imposing your own invented name in the constants. You proved nothing. So, as I said, with those two videos there is nothing new under the sun. Same old rhetoric, same lack of knowledge of how Hebrew, Greek, and Latin works, same silly arguments about the name of Jesus. All these videos do is create doubt in the minds of people about God's word and preach another gospel that turns the name of God into a magical incantation. That is why this thought pattern and these type of teachings are cults. You may have good intentions and have pure motivations to honor God, but the only thing you will find from people that produce videos like you shared or in any other sacred name camp are false teachers that will lead you astray and put you under a curse (Galatians 3:10) by encouraging you to follow a works based salvation through the law and a false-messiah that is not the Messiah in the New Testament. Again, that is why my videos warn people that this is a cult, so that they take this stuff serious and know this is not a game but has serious eternal consequences. My suggestions is that you take a more critical approach when you watch a video and test everything. Don't let somebody just flash things up on the video and say, "see here it is." Is it really there? Dive deeper. I hope that answered your questions.
@loriey9746 --- So, you only believe and accept things according to your feelings? Is your salvation based on how you feel today and subject to change depending on how you feel tomorrow? What about truth? Is that confirmed by good feelings or perhaps goosebumps on your arms? I don't recall a verse that tells us to forsake scripture and rely on how we feel about things. Scripture does state: "For we walk by faith, not by sight." (2 Corinthians 5:7) "Those who trust their own insight are foolish, but anyone who walks in wisdom is safe. (Proverbs 28:26) "Trust in the LORD with all your heart; do not depend on your own understanding." (Proverbs 3:5) That is the difference between you picking and choosing doctrine based on "feelings" and how God tells you can know what is true doctrine. Scripture (God's Word)!
@@Refuteit how about the effect of the Qodesh Spirit? You should feel peace and not confused man. And everything you have mentioned, dyou think I don't know that? You immediately judged me based on a simple phrase I have mentioned, lol. It seems like you're the one who needs to read more of these. As a seeker myself, I've been to a lot of different churches, I even got baptized (mostly Christian religion). However, these churches that I've been through don't celebrate the festival of the Most High which is written and even commanded by Himself to all of our generations. Like for example the Sukkot, that even the Messiah Himself celebrated. I don't wanna say His name here as I guess it's provoking for you. But like what i said, no religions out there taught me what are the festivals that need to be celebrated and what is not as everyone's teachings are almost the same. I used to be a Jehovah's witnesses as a kid, and I guess of all the religions out there, their teachings are the closest to what's in the bible. However, they don't celebrate the festivals as well. Even though they also know about pagan festivals that are being celebrated by most Christian religions out there, like Christmas. I respect them if that's their belief, but for me, I have my own belief based on my research and with the help of our Creator's guidance of the Spirit. As I have mentioned, I am a seeker who loves to read His words and making sure that His hebrew name is written on it. Keeping His Turah is His love language and if you seek further you'll know. Most religions nowadays are mixing lies and truths so be vigilant and you'll determine it by simply observing their festivals. Shalum brother.
@loriey9746 --- Thanks for proving my point. Anyone who says: the Jehovah's witnesses "teachings are the closest to what's in the bible." Has serious spiritual discernment issues and a lack of knowledge about the Bible. That is why your idea that "You should feel peace and not confused" is not working for you. If you are confused then you need to get instruction, not move to another church were you "feel" better. That is why you say: "As a seeker myself, I've been to a lot of different churches." You are looking for truth and for God in all the wrong ways. It's not biblical. Now, you are into one more error, which is following the Judaizers. Don't you read the Bible and see what it says about putting yourself under the Mosaic covenant? Understand this, if you put yourself under the law, the law requires you to keep ALL of it. You can't say I am commanded to just follow the feast days. No. That is not how it works. Over and over again, we are warned that if we put ourselves under the Mosaic laws, we MUST do everything in them, which is impossible to keep. We are actually told we no longer are under those laws that you claim you're commanded to follow. We serve under a new way by the Spirit and under the laws of Christ. Here is proof you are not under law: "For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one point, he has become guilty of ALL" (James 2:10) "And I testify again to every man receiving-circumcision that he is a debtor to do the WHOLE Law" (Galatians 5:3) Additionally, here is what is said about the Mosaic law. "When God speaks of a “new” covenant, it means he has made the first one obsolete." (Hebrews 8:13) "He has enabled us to be ministers of his new covenant. This is a covenant not of written laws, but of the Spirit. The old written covenant ends in death; but under the new covenant, the Spirit gives life." (2 Corinthians 3:6) "But now we have been released from the law, for we died to it and are no longer captive to its power. Now we can serve God, not in the old way of obeying the letter of the law, but in the new way of living in the Spirit." (Romans 7:6) "For they don’t understand God’s way of making people right with himself. Refusing to accept God’s way, they cling to their own way of getting right with God by trying to keep the law." (Romans 10:3) "Don't let anyone tell you what you must eat or drink. Don't let them say you must celebrate the New Moon festival, the Sabbath, or any other festival. These things are only a shadow of what was to come. But Christ is real! (Colossians 2:17) So, you need to study and be taught. Not chase feelings.
@@Refuteit so what's your religion then? Why did the Messiah been called Jesus if it's not His name in Hebrew? Since u love educating people and acting as if you know everything even the hearts and minds of people, tell me more. Like what i have mentioned I am a seeker and I'm seeking the truth. Everyone has something to say about the scripture and debating endlessly claiming they are the TRUTH. Tell me more about the TRUTH that u know then. Because basically if this is the case, then the bible was actually contradicting itself? Because as written, the Turah or Laws are FOREVER and needs to be kept for all generations. Forever. All generations. And the Messiah didn't abolish the laws but fulfilled it. Anyways, I really wanna know more. Maybe you can email me or if you have telegram where we can have this discussion. My purpose here is not to argue but to learn. Because if the bible contradicts itself, maybe it's about time to try different beliefs then like Buddhism or Hinduism. Like what I said, I'm open. As long as it's the truth.
@loriey9746 --- The Bible is not “contradicting itself” as you think. God had a plan from the very beginning to save the entire world and the law was incapable of saving people: “The law of Moses was unable to save us because of the weakness of our sinful nature. So God did what the law could not do. He sent his own Son in a body like the bodies we sinners have. And in that body God declared an end to sin’s control over us by giving his Son as a sacrifice for our sins.” (Romans 8:3) You say: “Laws are FOREVER and needs to be kept for all generations. Forever. All generations.” My Response: The Hebrew word Olam does not always mean “forever” but can also mean a hidden time, a time beyond the horizon (til a future period) or until a new age to come. Context determines the application of the word. So, since we have the revelation of the New Testament explaining that the law of Moses had a temporary function and that we are not obligated to follow the feast days, dietary laws, Sabbaths, and ceremonies, we can get a better understanding that God had a better plan for us then living under the yoke of the law (Acts 15:10). We instead live by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9) Verses that show the law had a temporary or limited function: “So the law was our guardian until Christ came that we might be justified by faith. Now that this faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian [the law].” (Galatians 3:24-25) “Why, then, was the law given at all? It was added because of transgressions until the Seed [Jesus] to whom the promise referred had come.” (Galatians 3:19) “Yes, the old requirement about the priesthood was set aside because it was weak and useless. For the law never made anything perfect. But now we have confidence in a better hope, through which we draw near to God.” (Hebrews 7:18-19) “For that old system deals only with food and drink and various cleansing ceremonies-physical regulations that were in effect only until a better system could be established.” (Hebrews 9:10) “Therefore no one will be declared righteous in God’s sight by the works of the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of our sin.” (Romans 3:20) You say: “And the Messiah didn't abolish the laws but fulfilled it.” My Response: Jesus did fulfill them but probably not in the same way you are thinking about fulfillment. “For Christ has already accomplished the purpose for which the law was given. As a result, all who believe in him are made right with God.” (Romans 10:4) “He did this by ending the system of law with its commandments and regulations. He made peace between Jews and Gentiles by creating in himself one new people from the two groups.” (Ephesians 2:14-16) “Don't let anyone tell you what you must eat or drink. Don't let them say you must celebrate the New Moon festival, the Sabbath, or any other festival. These things are only a shadow of what was to come. But Christ is real [or the reality of these shadows]! (Colossians 2:16-17) So, when Jesus said he fulfilled the law, that means he completed its purpose and transformed it into something better, which was God’s original plan. “ Remember, scripture also says, “This is what I mean: the law, which came 430 years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void.” (Galatians 3:17) So, the law does not supersede the covenant of faith that God made before the law was introduced. We are under this covenant of grace and faith, which is not by our works of the law. “For if the inheritance could be received by keeping the law, then it would not be the result of accepting God’s promise.” (Galatians 3:18) We still have three uses of the law, so we do not cast it aside as worthless. It is not a way of salvation nor is it a way to please God, earn points, to be set apart, sanctified, or maintain your salvation. Grace through faith in Christ alone accomplishes all of that not the law. The law cannot save anyone. Therefore, you can rest from trying to be good enough for God. There is nothing you can do to earn his favor. Instead, you have a perpetual Sabbath rest in the fulfilled (finished) works of Christ as your savior and righteousness. Does that mean we have a license to sin? Not at all! Our faith will produce good works and love for God and for our neighbors (people). These good works do not come from following demands from a law, but by the Spirit of God operating in you and through you to bless the world.
@Marie Rejoice in Jesus Yes, you will find Yeshua in 1 Chronicles 24:11, 2 Chronicles 31:15, Ezra 2:2, 2:6, 2:36, 2:40, 3:2, 3:8-9, 4:4, 8:33, 10:18, Nehemiah 3:19, 7:7, 7:11, 7:39, 7:43, 8:7, 8:17, 9:4, 10:9, 11:26, 12:1, 12:7, 12:8, 12:10, 12:24, and 12:26. However, you will won't see it in an English translation because they will render it in the English form of the name, but you will see it in the Hebrew/Aramaic, which you should be able to view on biblehub. You can see it in Greek by looking up these passages in the Septuagint at studybible.info. I hope that answers your question. Thank you for watching the video and commenting.
HalleluYE? Or do you sing HalleluYAH ? And The saviour said...I come In the name of My Father and you dont believe me...He Must have his fathers name In his name...but yes...everyone believes Differently...your free to believe What you want...and the same to me...
@RockyDempers --- Your two examples prove two things. #1. That you or the people that you listen to about the name Yahuah have no understanding how Hebrew grammar works, such as the difference between a prefix and suffix and how the two will differ in certain Hebrew words or names. #2. That you or the people that taught you about John 5:43, have not used proper hermeneutical (interpretation) skills and therefore you both come to wrong conclusions about the meaning of that scripture verse, which leads you into faulty doctrines. (((( Example of proper interpretations of John 5:43:)))) "He came in the name of, as representing, the Father" -- Ellicott's Commentary "They could not appreciate and accept Jesus who came in God’s name, that is, who truly represented God." -- Expositor's Greek Testament "I am come in my Father's name - By the authority of God; or giving proof that I am sent by him." -- Barne's Notes on the Bible "I am come clothed with an authority from my Father, sent by him for this very purpose, to reveal his will to men for their salvation; I speak, I do nothing but by the authority of my Father which sent me; nor do I aim at my own glory, but the glory of him that sent me: yet you give no credit to my words, nor embrace me, as him whom God hath sent for the Saviour of man." --- Matthew Poole's Commentary "I am come in my Father's name,.... Power and authority; by his consent, with his will, and according to a covenant with him: Christ came not of himself, of his own accord, by a separate power and will of his own, but was called, and sent, and came by mutual agree meat; and brought his credentials with him, doing the works and miracles which his Father gave him to finish:" --- Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible " ‘I come with the highest credentials, as My Father’s representative (comp. John 8:42), and ye reject Me.’" --- Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges "I have come in the name (i.e. in the power, with the credentials, with the encompassing revelation) of my Father, and ye receive me not. " --- Pulpit Commentary **** As you can see, no one says the verse is saying that the name of Christ is the same as the Father's name. That is not what the verse means and your interpretation distracts from the true message of the passage, which is that Christ operated under the blessings, mission, unity, and authority of the Father who is all Israel understood and reverenced. So, Christ did not act alone and based off his own ideas. A very important message. *** With all this in mind and the examples shown by scholars of the Word, it’s clear that understanding Scripture requires us to use proper interpretation techniques. Misinterpretations will happen when we don’t pay attention to language details, like Hebrew grammar, or when we read our own ideas into the text instead of letting the verse speak for itself as the original writer intended for it to read. It’s crucial for us to dive into the Scriptures considering the context and background of what we read. This way, we can avoid falling into the trap of faulty doctrines as so many do in this yahuah cult, trying to twist the meaning of the verse in an effort to create a "proof text" for their pet doctrine. Instead, let’s commit to being thoughtful students of the Word, seeking the true meaning of Scripture so that we can grow in faith based on sound doctrine. So, it might be time for you to seek more reliable sources of information instead of relying on the Yahuah/Natsarim cult, which emphasizes a name that doesn't exist according to ancient Hebrew grammar. Unless however, you're okay with them disregarding established rules or creating their own grammar rules based on conspiracy theories and the fear of the mysterious "they" hiding the truth from you. So, it may be worth it for you to explore perspectives grounded in sound scholarship rather than uneducated speculation and the manipulation of God's word.
@Margaret Baker Yeshua is Hebrew - Jesus is English from the Latin/Greek = Iesus (which is from the original Greek text written by the apostles). It is true that the English translation of Iesus would be Joshua, but to distinguish the Savior from Joshua (the man) English tradition has kept the Saviors name close to its Greek/Latin origin, thus we keep his name as: "Jesus" rather than fully translating it Joshua. So, Jesus is more accurate to the original text of the Bible than what people think.
The Name is turning the world upside-down again.
YOD-HAY-UAU is YAHU. SHIN-AYIN is the suffix in ALISHA (H477) and YAHUSHA (H3091).
H3068 (YOD-HAY-UAU-HAY) uses four vowels for the Name of YAHUAH in at least 6,823 places in Scripture.
The suffix SHA is from the root YASHA (YOD-SHIN-AYIN.
The prophet "ISA-IAH" is YASHAYAHU,
YAHU+SHA is H3091, and found 216 times. It means "I am your Deliverer."
It was first used at Num. 13:16 when the name of HUSHA (H1954) was altered.
@LewWhite10 --- Yeah, you are "turning the world upside-down" Lew and in the wrong direction. I pray for all of the people you have led astray over the years with your perversion of the Hebrew and the false gospel that you promote by telling people they can only be saved if they use the name Yahusha or that God will not hear them unless they call out Yahuah.
Yahuah and Yahusha **never** existed in Hebrew and cannot be constructed according to proper and legitimate past or present Hebrew grammar. However, that does not stop you from continuing to claim to be a Hebrew expert and passing off flawed grammar rules as truth.
All you are doing is taking the YHWH and infusing it with your flawed grammar and lie to people by claiming your fake name shows up "6,823 places in Scripture" and on numerous inscriptions, but the only thing that shows up is YHWH, not Yahuah. Have you no shame for that deception?
Even more tragic is how you have people believing that the New Testament is flawed, that Jesus is a false Christ and that there was a secret conspiracy to remove the truth from the Bible or were inserted in the Bible just to debunk your claims. Very convenient!! When you can't fight back against truth that refutes your lies, you just make up conspiracies and misinformation. I hope one day the many that follow you will wake up to see how you have led them astray.
@@Refuteit
YHWH, the popularized form for the 4 Hebrew vowels of the Name, YAHUAH, is slightly incorrect. No one should be condemned for making a mistake, until they are shown the Truth, and reject it. It is Yahusha in us Who guides us into all Truth. Without His indwelling, we are helpless and will fall prey to the rules of men.
The letter "double-U" (VV) is a new letter added after the invention of the printing press. The Latin letter V is not the VEE sound most think it is today, but simply the way the Latin alphabet inherited the Greek letter UPSILON, known by the sound of our modern letter "U." The double-U is a misrepresentation of the Hebrew letter UAU, simply the sound of U, as in the names NetanYahu, AliYahu, Yahuah, and Yahusha. U is the sixth letter of the Hebrew alef-beth, not the waw people have been taught. We only invite problems for ourselves if we hear the Truth, and do not receive a love for it. At that point, we will be sent a strong delusion to favor the lie (2 Thess. 2:11-12).
LORD is the definition of the Hebrew word BEL, H1167, and used to replace the true Name YAHUAH (H3068) at least 6,823 times. Read the Preface of your translation, and see how the translators admit doing this.
@@Refuteitrecently one of our members of our church fell for this, her whole family followed, a friend of hers as well, now they’re trying to take more members into believing this non-sense, she visits people and brings confusion. This is why we have to be equipped with the word of God so we don’t fall for just anyone who tries to show they know so much more than you. Bringing Bible verses and names and what not. Church needs to wake up and start having a better relationship with our God, praying, fasting, reading, studying the word. Without cease. Blessings.
@LewWhite10 -- #1. YHWH is not 4 Hebrew vowels but consonants. Your insistence that YHWH are 4 vowels, is because you misunderstand what Josephus was saying in Jewish Wars, 5. 5. 7, which was his reference to the Greek transliteration of YHWH, which used 4 Greek vowels, and since Jewish Wars was in Greek, his Greek audience understood this.
#2. You are wrong about the W in YHWH. Modern Hebrew has evolved the sound to a V but originally vav was a W sound, which every legitimate scholar of Hebrew understands. You are wrong about the Greek as well because the ancient Greek, like Hebrew, is derived from Phoenician and Greek had the digamma which was a W. Aramaic also has the W as well. And you are wrong about English not having a W until the invention of the printing press because English, which is a combination of Greek, Latin and Germanic languages did have a W long before the printing press as seen in the runic and as mentioned also in the Greek. You need to understand the difference between the existence of a sound and letter in a language and the later creation of a dedicated letter for a particular sound.
#3. In regards to the word Lord, and translations replacing YHWH with Lord, many of the translations did so because they formerly used Jehovah in place of YHWH and the Jews use Adonai. Therefore, to be more “universal” rather than take a stance on any particular name they used “Lord” in place of YHWH. If you don’t like the fact that a particular translation did that, then don’t buy that translation. Simple solution! However, since you created and sell your own translation, and are in competition with all of these other translations that you criticize, it becomes clear why you would want to create these conspiracies and drama.
@Godisgood3789 -- Thank you for sharing that. It is true that we are seeing many more things enter churches that are attempting to steer people from the true Gospel and bring discredit to the Word of God like this nonsense with God's name. I agree with you that we need to wake up and start speaking out against these things but it appears there are too many other things churches are focused on that are more like motivational seminars than places that equip the saints.
I asked my heavenly father to help reveal this truth to me and he opened my eyes to the truth almighty Yahusha is lifted high, almighty YAHUAH is to be praised. When you worship him in spirit and truth you will see
@YAHSCHOSENFAV --- Just because you asked for something and think you got a revelation, that alleged "revelation" does not validate a fake name that never existed in the Hebrew language, has never appeared in history, never showed up in archaeological artifacts, was never in the Bible, and is grammatically incorrect.
You did not hear back from the Father if you feel the revelation was the names Yahusha or YAHUAH. Therefore, that is something you need to go back and figure out, keeping in mind that God will never go against his revealed word, the Bible.
There is no letter double-u in Eberith, yet there is a reference to Yahweh commonly preferred by English teachers of the four vowels, yod-hay-uau-hay (YHUH).
The form YESHUA (H3444) is found as a common word for salvation, and certainly not a word worthy of being stoned to death over. This is a noun seen as the last word in Psalm 91. The five-lettered name invented by Mushah for his assistant at Numbers 13:16 (see interlinear for proof of this) is spelled yod-hay-uau-shin-ayin, but usually seen written in the Aramith script we brought back from our captivity in Babel. YAHUSHA is the closest and simplest expression of these 5 Eberith letters. YESHUA is not the correct name for obvious reasons. All it means is "salvation." Yahusha declares "I am your Deliverer."
The high priest mentioned at ZekarYah 3 was YAHUSHA, not YESHUA.
@Lew White ---There is absolutely a letter W and the W sound not only in the ancient Hebrew, but in ALL Semitic languages to include proto-semitic/proto-sinaitic. Additionally, early Egyptian hieroglyphics reveals that there was a letter W in that language as well, which the Hebrews since the time of Joseph (aka: Zaphnathpaaneah - Gen. 41:45) would have been exposed to. This is even more true about Moses, who was raised in the royal court of Egypt. Since you claim the Jews adopted the language of Babel during their captivity, would you not equally have to agree that the Hebrews also would have been exposed to and likely adopted the W from Egypt? The evidence is too overwhelming for you to deny this or to make a claim that the Hebrews had no knowledge or use of the letter W. This truth may make you and your followers uncomfortable, but it is time for you and your followers to get better resources to study.
Let me just make you aware that I am familiar with your “ministry” and how you attempt to use these linguistic tricks to cause people to doubt the Bible, which then opens them up to the other more serious doctrinal errors you teach, like claiming the Christian Jesus is false and denying the deity of Christ, etc.
I have also seen what you say on your website and social media when you are corrected or refuted. You like to claim how you are being persecuted by others for simply exposing false reasoning and strongholds. No. You are not exposing false reasoning and strongholds, and you are not be persecuted. I am correcting you in the hopes that you will turn away from the false teachings that you are peddling and from the spiritual damage you are causing others when they fall from truth and follow your teachings. So, don’t include me among your list of persecutors, because I have faith that you can change.
Exactly yeshua was Joshua before the j
False name
@@RefuteitThat was extremely well said
@@Refuteit💪👏
As for me and my house we will serve YAHUAH... halleluYAH for YAHUSHA
@Shanna Honea Yahuah or Yahusha do not appear in the scriptures any where. If you think those two names represent the Father and the Savior then it is time to stop listening to people that have no clue about Hebrew and begin to get correct instruction from people that know what they are talking about. **** Stop letting the ignorance of another person be your source of education ****
th-cam.com/video/GpO2l3BBIPs/w-d-xo.html
@Lion of Yahudah You guys run to the Paleo Hebrew because you know that YAHUAH violates the rules of Hebrew grammar. So, to get around the rules you only use Paleo Hebrew and claim it does not have rules. See this video: th-cam.com/video/A_E4y0fzj8I/w-d-xo.html
What is the real name of Creator ?
Thanks Brother, it's very easy, what language did they wrote on top of the cross, Greek, Latin and Hebrew,
All 3 wrote about Jesus, Jesus the Nazarene King of the Jews, so it was Jesus all the way until James strong who wrote Hebrew concordance in late 1860. And then Ben Yehuda's who created the Hebrew dictionary also in the late 1860, so Ben was a Jew Orthodox, and many Jewish people are against Jesus.
So who do we have to believe the sign on the cross or men who had made up all these names.
How far can you date Yahuaha??
Thanks Brother
Why is David pronounced "Da-veed" if that v sound is a u?
Its like reading the name Wagner in German and not realizing that Vahg-ner isn't Wag-nur.
Yahovah I understand. Yahuah I don't understand.
David is "Davide" because the vav is a Vah sound.
Sometimes I don’t understand ! Man is the one who Changed his name. His name is Yahuah and sons name is Yahusha!. Please do your diligent research ( Lord, God, Jesus etc…) all have pagan roots, it is the belief and power that we held unto when these names were called.
Please seek The most high Yahuah on this matter! Because it’s or of deception here.
@Charline Charles The only man that changed the name that you should be concerned about is the one that lied to you and told you the name of the Father is Yahuah and the Son is Yahusha. No such names exist in the scriptures or in the past. It is not rocket science. You simply need to turn to the scriptures and the names are right there in Hebrew. And, guess what? The Greek New Testament is also the inspired word and you can see the names in that language as well. Because the Father is multilingual. There are even historic accounts (before Christianity)of the names in Greek. No mystery! No paganism involved! Do the research and don't let someones ignorance of the facts and truth be your source of education.
@Lion of Yahudah That same excuse is used by multiple cults and everyone else that cannot produce proof for their doctrines. The old "they removed it from the Bible." excuse.
So, let's step back for a moment a take a close look at the picture that you're trying to paint. So, you believe that the name Yahuah and Yahusha was once in the Bible (which there is zero evidence for). Then every Jew from the BC era conspired to remove those names. Then when Christianity came on the scene the Jews had a secret meeting with the Christians and asked them to join in their conspiracy to remove the names. The Christians agreed and continued to follow the Jews in removing Yahua and Yahusha from the scriptures. Then this secret agreement was so successful that it got passed down from generation to generation. Then one day, the publishers of the NIV revealed the secret in their preface. A secret that was never revealed before. A secret that has remained hidden and unknown by the majority of Christianity for over 2,000 years. But now in the 21st century, dedicated followers have re-discovered the true name and once again for the first time since the BC era, the name Yahuah and Yahusha has been restored! So, now that the name has been restored and the conspiracy that spanned multiple centuries has been exposed, we can throw out all 5,000+ Greek manuscripts of the NT, all the Septuagint manuscripts, all the Dead Sea Scroll manuscripts that contain the name, and the historic writers (both Jews and Christians) and all the archaeological evidence because you know it's all tainted and full of errors. So, would that be the summary of your conspiracy that you're trying to sell??
Because that is how it sounds and I hope you can see how beyond far fetched that whole excuse really is.
So, you can continue to follow these silly ideas and the people making them up, or you can get back to reality and truly discover the teachings handed down to us from Christ and the apostles. Not teachings made up in the 21st century from the minds of people that have no clue what their talking about.
@Endtime Watchmen Okay. I will do a few videos on the subject. Stay tuned and I am working on a page for Refuteit.com
@Lion of Yahudah No one changed the names and the NIV preface does not "admit that they removed the name of Yahuah." The preface states that they use Lord in place of the YHWH, which is perfectly fine because the Septuagint (300 BC) did the same thing (Kurios=Lord and Theos=God) and so did the apostles. Are you going to blame the apostles of lying and being part of your conspiracy as well?
You guys need to go back to a Bible believing and teaching church, instead of believing conspiracies based on zero evidence.
@Entime Watchmen Go look at Exodus 3:14 in Hebrew if you want to know what the creator called himself before the New Testament, then go read Exodus 3:14 in Hebrew. He said his personal name was Ehyeh
Here is a video for you: th-cam.com/video/A_E4y0fzj8I/w-d-xo.html
Yah is my deliverer =Yahusha.
@Peggy Russell But deliver you to where? More than likely to a place that you may not want to go if you continue to follow wrong teachings. The more you reject what is in the Bible, the further you get from truth until you will find yourself in a place you never intended to go. Come back to truth.
@Lion of Yahudah God has more than one name. Go read Exodus chapter 3. Also, you only run to the the Paleo Hebrew because you think by doing so you are not bound by Hebrew grammar rules, which would quickly debunk the name Yahuah (which is not a Hebrew name). th-cam.com/video/A_E4y0fzj8I/w-d-xo.html also see: th-cam.com/video/VE1C1e0uAF8/w-d-xo.html (this video covers Acts 4:12)
Do people in USA have freedom call Him Jesus??
What about Job, James, John??
Matt. 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.
My husband and I prayed for confirmation on His Name and He Confirmed to us both that it's Yahuah and His Son Yahusha. You can believe or not I respect really no judgement.
Gods name was deliberately removed from Bible translations (some 7000 times ) and replaced with LORD or GOD.
He clearly says in the Bible Exodus 3:15
"This is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations"
Psalm 9:10
Those who know your name will trust in you, for you, have never forsaken those who seek you.” 6. Love His Name
And much more verses that our Creator left us to know how important for Him is to us be calling Him by His Name not Titles.
But again i'm coming in complete respect with this.
@karlalopez6531 --- Thank you for sharing your experience and perspective on the names. However, to be open and transparent with you, I hear the same things from others that have said the same about Yehovah and others said the exact same thing about Yahweh or a whole host of other names. So, can we really go by what we interpret God is saying to us alone or should we not confirm it by legitimate evidence as well?
I appreciate that you and your husband are seeking prayer, but why not consider praying about why this is so important for you to settle on a "Hebrew name" that you must call the Father. What is so sinful or wrong about using your English language or names that are in the Bible? Why not follow the example of Christ, which told us to pray just saying Father?
I have seen far too many harmed by this movement because of all the extra baggage that gets added to it, like how you are not saved unless you use the right name, or your prayers won't be answered unless you use the right name and then you get plunged into a works based salvation and sanctification system, and thus depart from Christ, putting yourself under a curse as described in Galatians.
@karlaopez6531 -- Well, respectfully, his name was not deliberately removed from the Bible. In fact, the main person who started that rumor claims the translations that allegedly did that announced it in the preface of their translation--so, not really a super-secret hidden conspiracy as that person claimed.
What some translations did was to replace YHWH or Adonai from the original text with the English word Lord to make it easier for people to read. There are plenty of resources that one can go to to see what the original text actually says, so again, not a conspiracy or anything, just a decision a translation committee made for their intended audience.
@@Refuteit I understand and respect your point of view, thank you for not being disrespectful. It doesn't matter what is important to me or what is easier for me to call Him. If He wants us to call Him by His name like multiple scriptures He left for is stating it then I will ask him for the name He wants us to call him. I live for him and I will do anything to Respect Him and His name and If I prayed and not only me but my husband received the Same dream, I will honor it.
But honestly I respect if you don't see it that way, what is important that we glorify the Same Elohim❤️
@@karlalopez6531Do you call your biological Father by his given name?.
Or because of your relationship with him do you call him Father?..
Evrytime I come across those that push this heresy...
It's always: "No one told me this name., It was revealed to me., I prayed and the Father confirmed it." ect...which is not true, you came across this name on the internet just like all those that follow this nonsense...
It is obvious that none of you are testing the spirits...
Like the scriptures say to do...
You are no longer willing to endure sound doctrine and you are bringing a new Gospel, just as the scriptures say...
Old hebrew and the concordance which is number literally lines up perfectly. For the name YAHUAH AND YAHUSHA.
@josephfaulkner2230 -- There is nothing in any "old hebrew" anything (text, carvings, or otherwise) that pronounces YHWH or YHVH as Yahuah.
Additionally, a concordance is typically based off a particular translation of the Bible or the original language, the most famous is Strongs. However, a look at Strongs shows the following:
"Transliteration: Yhvh
Phonetic Spelling: (yeh-ho-vaw') ---- NOT Yahuah"
--AND--
A look at Brown-Driver-Briggs says:
"יהוהc. 6823 i.e. יַהְוֶה
proper name, of deity Yahweh, the proper name of the God of Israel" - NOT Yahuah
As an added reference for you, the Encyclopedia Judaica says: “the true pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton YHWH was never lost. The name was pronounced Yahweh.”
So, I don't know what you are reading, but the proper pronunciation of YHWH is not Yahuah.
@@RefuteitThank you for all your hard work, you are greatly appreciated...
This nonsense drives me nuts...
Please keep up the great work you do for the Kingdom...
You shouldn't post something you so obviously have no knowledge about. Watch your step. You are dealing with a holy name
@janineclaassens9019 --- What I do know is Hebrew, history, paleography, and the Bible. Additionally, I have debated the Yahuah/Yahusha names and many other invented sacred names since 2012. My base of "knowledge" to these names are not from TH-cam or Facebook.
Therefore, it’s disappointing to see you dismiss the messenger because you’re uncomfortable with the message. This name that you're defending is a recent invention from the Hebrew Roots movement and was made up this century, and so instead of questioning the legitimacy of the Yahuah and Yahusha names, you resort to attacks on the messenger. A sad reflection on your part.
Your inability to engage with the counter-evidence proves that you only heard something about the Yahuah/Yahusha names and willfully accepted it as truth without extensive verification of the "evidence" that these people presented to you, and now you are left inadequate to defend what you believe and can only at best parrot the lines of rhetoric you heard others speak.
This is why it's worth taking the time to verify claims rather than blindly accepting what you’ve heard.
ZephaniYAHU
Zephaniali
NechemYAHU
-Nchemiah
ChizaiY.
Hezckinh
YAHUchannon
Jolin
Isaiah
YAHU
MatitYAHU
Matthew
ZechanYAHU
Zechariah
EIYAHU
Yerme Y AHU
Elijah
Jeremiah
For I say unto you, Ye shall not see
me henceforth, till ve shall sav.
"Blessed is he that cometh
in the name of YAHUAH"
YAHU SHA
NEITHER IS THERE
SALVATION IN ANY OTHER:
FOR THERE IS NONE OTHER
NAME UNDER HEAVEN GIVEN
AMONG MEN, WHEREBY WE
MUST BE SAVED,
ACTS 412
I am come in my Father's name,
and ye receive me not: if
another shall come in his own
name, him ye will receive.
JOHN 5:43
@Dorrie All of those prophet names were not originally spelled that way. See this video: th-cam.com/video/A_E4y0fzj8I/w-d-xo.html
Acts 4:12 and John 5:43 do not mean what you think it means. See this video: th-cam.com/video/QTTjuQIUp_I/w-d-xo.html
You might also be interested in this video: th-cam.com/video/VE1C1e0uAF8/w-d-xo.html
I come in My Father's NAME/AUTHORITY...
He comes in his Father's AUTHORITY not an actual name..
🙄🙄🙄
Apparently the NT was written in aramaic (sister lang to hebrew) but was destroyed by the romans. Apparently it makes sense that it was in Aramaic as some translations in koine greek make no sense as the meaning is of hebrew/aramaic originally and only makes sense when explained in that way. It would make sense as they burned a rabbis including haninah teradion for using the true name of our heavenly father and teaching the OT (torah). Yet you think YaH appointed the holy scriptures to them? If they could have destroyed the original torah no doubt they would have but it was too late at that point. It was already sacred before the romans even knew about YaH. Just saying.
@Faith And what you are saying is a lot of speculation, historic inaccuracies, and Dan Brown "Da Vinci Code" like fiction. The evidence is overwhelming and undeniable that the NT was originally written in Greek. The Romans did not travel around the world and destroy every NT text. The NT was not written in Hebrew nor was it written in Aramaic. th-cam.com/video/ikKATvRXL8s/w-d-xo.html
It certainly cannot be Jesus… the letter, J, was not invented until the year 1524 CE. NO word nor name in ANY language of ALL the world began with the letter,J. The pagan name Jesus, means , inferior , substandard, in Hreek. YAHUAH/YAHUSHA means “ l am the
deliverer.” In Paleo Hebrew.
HIS REAL NAME IS;
Ayah Ashar Ayah!
“ l Am whom I Am”
So what if the letter J was a later invention? Languages evolve and change. The J sound has been in the English language for centuries prior and used other letters/characters to symbolize the sound. By the way, the letter J was not invented in 1524, because the letter J is in the 1382 Wycliffe Bible, which means that letter J was familiar to people and used prior to that date. You make the same error as do most sacred namers like you, by using this English letter J argument to elevate Hebrew names. English and Hebrew are two different languages, with different grammar, and letters. Stop using Hebrew to demonize English. If English is so demonic and pagan as you claim, then why are you using it to type your comments?
Calling in the name of Jesus Christ works against demons that's for sure, try calling for who you are saying and report back simple.
I keep seeing Yehuah and Yahusha and they just don't sit well with me.
I pray the Lord to open the eyes of my understanding and let the truth rise like Joseph's wheat and lies fall down like tares.
Same. I thino. Coz we grew up praying in the name of Jesus to God our Father. But we never really used God's name isnt it. I think it would make God very happy if wr cannuse His name. Coz there are many gods out there. But we serve the one true living God.
@Gasper Forever--- Where in the Bible does it mandate that every believer must speak Hebrew? Can you find that passage? To say that everyone must perfectly speak Hebrew to properly say God's name is found nowhere in the Bible. Therefore, why do you put a burden on yourself that is not biblical only because you are listening to people that want to put you under spiritual slavery and under their teachings? God created you to live in the nation you live and to speak the language that you speak: "From one man he created all the nations throughout the whole earth. He decided beforehand when they should rise and fall, and he determined their boundaries." (Acts 17:26) and it is God that put various languages in the mouth of the people. There is nothing wrong with speaking to God in the language you were destined to be born under.
@@Refuteit This. When the Lord confused the languages at Babel, all the people who prayed to Him in their new language (that they had zero input in creating), prayed to Him. How could He be offended, since He was the one who changed their language? As people moved, over the years, language changes. At one point, Hebrew was a dead language! The name of Jesus or Yeshua or Yehusha, as long as we are talking about the one born of a virgin, died for our sins, conquered death, rose the third day, and is the only son of Creator God, we will be ok. I cannot think that the years I spent praying to Jesus were wasted, because it brought me to Torah. The whole Word. The LORD God knows who are His and will keep them, no matter what language they speak.
I have lately seen people say that if you don't call him Yahusha he wont hear you. Someone also called the bible satanic
The name of Jesus has delivered me time and time again. I mean, I was in thy throws of life and death in the realm of it spirit and the name Jesus Christ saved me by breaking whatever demonic hold was over me.
Jesus Christ aka Yeshua Hamashiac is it.
I'm
Thank you for sharing your testimony.
Jesus Christ works for me also.
Like you, I have had a video clearly showing the fallacies and grammatical impossibility of the very new appearance of the pronunciation "Yahusha."
I can't help but notice that your comments are also filled with blind ignorance trying to defend a position with absolutely zero evidence or support from anywhere.
This flawed pronunciation is perpetrated by those who know next to nothing about Hebrew grammar, deny the written historical evidence and continue causing confusion among the body of Mashiach.
Psalms 68:4 KJV show JAH but the letter J didn’t exist back the till 400-500 years ago nor is there a J sound or letter J in Hebrew, in the NKJV it says YAH
Psalms 68:4
Isaiah 12:2,4. 26:4. 38:11
First of all, you do know that English is not the same as Hebrew, correct? So, when one language (Hebrew) is translated into another language (English) the finished text will have different sounds, letters, and words. Also, how they spoke in 1611 is not how we speak today.
Second, languages adapt and change over the years. In old English Father used to be Faeder. Is that how you say it today? So, your point about how the language added letters to tie it to an exclusive sound rather than sharing a letter for multiple sounds is meaningless.
Finally, your point is also incorrect, because there actually always was a J sound in English and even a previous symbol for the J sound which goes back to the 2nd or 4th century AD proto-English. Even the Wycliffe Bible that goes back to 1382 (641 years ago) is filled with the letter J. Symbols for sounds in languages come and go, like the ancient Greek Digamma for the W / Waw sound as an example.
Stop believing the lies people are spreading about the Bible, about biblical languages, and about the English language.
@@RefuteitI just want to say you are honestly contending for the Faith! God promised to preserve his Word for us and so many people has been set free by the name Jesus. God does not expect everyone one to learn Hebrew.
Can you translate a name? Its a name and it shall be called as it is not translate it lol
@nganungmanghilabotmangyudu6117 --- Oh really? Then let's put your claim to the test. Pronounce this ("Влади́мир") in English just the way you read it, and remember, like you claim, this "shall be called as it is" without translating it and without looking it up online or putting it through GOOGLE TRANSLATE. Since I know you are still going to look it up, try to pronounce it like a native speaker, see how easy that goes for you.
When you are ready to give up, here is a video to show you that your point is wrong. th-cam.com/video/_02dwYFZBKM/w-d-xo.html
Great video saved me from going down a pointless rabbit hole!
Wow! Thank you for sharing that great comment. We love reading encouraging feedback.
The ONLY inspired language and alphabet is Paleo Hebrew. ALL other languages are pagan and inadequate and distorted and inferior , substandard to the original Hebrew.
We just made a video to address your statement. Paleo Hebrew is not an "inspired language" and all other languages are not pagan. Watch this video and learn why your statement is wrong: th-cam.com/video/cupaB0rGtGU/w-d-xo.html
Is the saviour's name the same as Joshua's name? Yehoshua
@gracediscipleship --- Yes. That is correct.
Not a very good way of debunking this I'm afraid
@user-mt4ml6cj5j -- So, switch roles and provide five compelling reasons the name of Yahusha is false. I would like to read about your better way to do it.
My spirit tells me Yahusha is fake also, where's the fruit of those who worship him? Also look at them trying to use fear, mocking, shame and guilt to silence you. A true christian wouldn't do that. This is another way of the devil to idolize a specific name and sow discord among believers of christian doctrines. Jesus Christ will always be attacked, for he is the Light in this world.
The name doesn’t bear fruit .. “ I come in my Father's name" is a quote from the Bible, John 5:43. The verse continues, "and you do not receive me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him" Everyone knows the name Jesus but J doesn’t exist in hebrew though he spoke Hebrew ??? His name had to be Hebrew it’s a fact along with the verse His name would have to be similar with his fathers name Yahuah and Yahusha the son and if someone else comes in his own name you will receive him everyone accepts Jesus will accept him further more The Name Jesus Christ is associated with Christmas and every other holiday which is paganism smh The creator can be associated with Sin ….. break down the name Je sus and the meaning
@tayafrieson6294 --- It would really be nice if individuals like yourself would first view all of the content (videos) on a channel prior to commenting or at least read the previous comments, so that I would not have to address the repetitive rhetoric made by the Yahuah pandemonium. All of the things that you presented have been debunked (John 5:43, the letter J, his name supposedly having to be the same as his Fathers name, and the allegation that Jesus means something derogatory, etc, etc.)
So, I invite you to grab a coffee, relax, and watch some of the playlists on the channel related to the topic. I recommend you start with this one:
th-cam.com/play/PLqgWCG_xu-1auflm8g0pVu4sbHUB5CY_D.html
Then watch this one:
th-cam.com/play/PLqgWCG_xu-1bMBVI94S7iDxHtquZ4FJCJ.html
Who ever posted this. Woe to you. You're in danger.
@Stella Sounds like you didn't watch the video. Whoever sold you the lie that Yahusha is the name of the Savior, is actually the one bringing you a different Gospel and Paul said if anyone does that, they are cursed.
@@Refuteit It's not up for debate. You're treading on dangerous ground.
@Stella G So, let's analyze this for a moment. So, you deny (1) Over 2,000 years of church history discussing the name (2) Deny over 5,000 Greek New Testament manuscripts (3) Deny the Greek Septuagint which we have BC Era textual evidence for showing the name (4) Deny very early Aramaic text with the name (5) Deny non-Christians writers that wrote out the names in both Hebrew and Greek (6) Deny the Masoretic vowel points (7) and you look past the fact that not once do we ever see the name Yahusha in scripture, text, or history. (because the name was manufactured in the 21st century from a persons mind).
However, despite all your denial of this truth and mountain of evidence, you still say I am the one on dangerous grounds??
I don't think debunking false teachings and lies puts me on dangerous grounds. I think the person that turns away from the truth, the mountain of evidence, some of which I mentioned above, puts a person on dangerous grounds.
"For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will TURN THEIR EARS AWAY FROM THE TRUTH and turn aside to myths." 2 Timothy 4:3-4
@Lion of Yahudah There is no hypocrisy. The name of Jesus in Hebrew does appear in Hebrew, Aramaic, and in Greek in numerous text. And, the name is not what you guys claim it is. That's the point I was making.
@Endtime Watchmen You are right. There are some Hebrew letters that work as both vowels and constants and become either depending on the context. However, the name of Yahuah violates the rules of Hebrew grammar. Hebrew syllables need both vowels and constants, so a name cannot be all vowels.
The four vowels is something you obviously are borrowing from Josephus, who made that claim. However, even if the YHWH are all vowels, that still does not equal YAHUAH. You still need constants in each syllable.
THE ORIGINAL BOOKS OF THE BIBLE... WERE NOT WRITTEN IN HEBREW.
@IAMWORLDBULLYCOMPOUNDGLOBAL -- Feel free to elaborate.
YAHUSHA loves you all
@Soho Divinci And Iesous Christos (A real name for the Savior that you can actually find in the Bible) loves you and would like you to discover the truth, rather than follow error.
@@RefuteitRespectfully Yahusha is not error. What if that is his real name and you called it an error. Again, respectfully we need to watch our words for he’ll judge our words in the last days if we don’t repent. We all need to grow in our knowledge and stop judging against each other instead we supposed to love each other especially in this time of seeking his truth including his Holy Name.
@sanalouis2620 --- I disagree that it is not an error as you believe, and I say that based off of facts and not opinion. The name Yahuah never existed prior to the 21st century. The name was invented from within the modern Hebrew Roots movement. So, not only is it an error, but it is a modern human invention.
I can tell you have not yet gone deep into the abyss of the Yahuah cult by your avatar which is a cross. The cross is taboo for any one using the name of Yahuah and is seen as a pagan symbol. Therefore, I hope there is still time to rescue you from the errors of that movement.
I suggest you watch this playlist (every video) and confirm everything stated for yourself. th-cam.com/play/PLqgWCG_xu-1auflm8g0pVu4sbHUB5CY_D.html
Yahusha's my Mashiak
Then you are following an unknown / False Messiah, because there is no such person in the Bible with that name or in the history of the Body of Christ. If you have fallen for that, what else have you fallen for? I invite you to rediscover the truth, return back to the teachings of the Bible and learn about the true Messiah.
That’s the antichrist.
@@Refuteit so just Jesus? No other name
@Refuteit you don't know what your talking about. Hebrew yod hey waw hey. W in the tetragrammaton makes the sound U like in food or rude. Yhuh is correct. W is is 2 U's hence double u or a long oo sound. Do research before you insert your foot in your mouth. Repent of your idols.
@Pr1nce4of4Peace4 --- So, let me get this straight: you think I should disregard the over 50 scholarly sources I gathered that confirm the Waw was pronounced as [w] in classical Biblical Hebrew? Is that what you’re suggesting?
Should I also overlook the fact that Yemenite Jews have preserved this classic W sound, just as other Semitic languages did? And what about the fundamental grammatical rules of both classic biblical and modern Hebrew that clearly show you can't construct a name like "Yahuah"? Should I simply toss aside the substantial archaeological evidence pointing to the vocalization of "Yahweh"?
Are you really serious in suggesting that I abandon all this in favor of chasing after self-proclaimed Hebrew experts from the Yahuah cult? Is that the path you would have me "research"-regurgitating the same tired mantras parroted in some Yahuah teacher's video?
No, thank you! I choose to stick with the legitimate experts. I'd rather not walk in ignorance, bolstered by unwarranted confidence in those who cling to delusions while dismissing the truth. You have nothing factual or substantial to offer that would sway me to adopt a 21st century invented name that came out of the Hebrew roots movement.
May Christ open your eyes to see and cause your ears to hear the truth and may he remove the hardness of your heart that has you despising the traditional teachings of Christianity, as given to us by the apostles. Amen!
Now I am even more confused. What if I believe the wrong thing and disappoint Yahuah/YHWH The Elohim of the Bible. All I want is to make HIM proud to follow the one true God and thank HIM for Yeshua/Yahusha for dying for my sins. I am not at the point I am literally scared of using names.
@C31living --- The fact that you feel that fear and bondage over this subject is evidence that you are listening to teachings or conversations that are not of God and discussions that are putting you under condemnation.
"For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind." 2 Timothy 1:7
"There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit...For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father....Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered... And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God." Romans 8:1, 15, 26-27
Do you see anything in that passage about if you don't get the name right God will not hear you as these sacred namers claim? The passage says that the Spirit of God will intercede on your behalf, does it not? So, why put yourself under fear?
The Gospel message of the scriptures is not to put you under fear and condemnation like others want you to be under, by demanding you speak their magical mantra and live under the Mosaic covenant to please God as one of their "Natsarim."
The message of the Gospel is that Christ lifted condemnation off of you and placed you in a position that you don't have to fear for your salvation and sanctification because you are not good enough. Why? Because no one is good enough to satisfy the demands of God's holiness. If they could please God by their performance then there would have been no need for Christ to come on our behalf.
"Salvation is not a reward for the good things we have done, so none of us can boast about it." Ephesians 2:9
"I do not treat the grace of God as meaningless. For if keeping the law could make us right with God, then there was no need for Christ to die." Galatians 2:21
"He saved us, not by the righteous deeds we had done [like saying a certain name or following the mosaic covenant, or by becoming a member of the Natsarim cult], but according to His mercy, through the washing of new birth and renewal by the Holy Spirit." Titus 3:5
"For they [the Jews] don’t understand God’s way of making people right with himself. Refusing to accept God’s way, they cling to their own way of getting right with God by trying to keep the law." Romans 10:3
Therefore, your fear is because of your focus is on your performance and if your performance will save you and keep you saved and be accepted by God. That is something you can never do for yourself. That is why it is not based on you being good enough for God or saying his name right, but solely on what Christ has done for you.
Stop listening to the lies of these Judaizers and legalistic cults. Cast off the lies of this Yahuah cult and ignore them. They are the type of people spoken about in the scriptures.
"They are the kind who work their way into people’s homes and win the confidence of vulnerable women who are burdened with the guilt of sin and controlled by various desires." 2 Timothy 3:6
Instead embrace the love, mercy and grace of God through Christ. Allow the Holy Spirit to infuse you with the love of God.
"No fear exists where his love is. Rather, perfect love gets rid of fear, because fear involves punishment. The person who lives in fear doesn’t have perfect love." 1 John 4:18
And through his love you will experience the fullness of the life God offers and will live in the life that pleases him as his daughter being led by the Spirit.
Here is another video you may want to watch: th-cam.com/video/vh1dECJM678/w-d-xo.html
Our Fathe who art in Heaven, hallowed by thy name... Even Jesus never called God by name. Our God wants to be called Father, because he is our Father. Ofc he knows who you are praying to. He is not dumb. Pray to the Father, through the Son by the Holy Spirit.
@@AxhenioShkurtithis dude is losing his faith to semantics
hey i have a question. do you think the laws where done away with
@Jellow Kellow --- Do I believe that all the Sabbaths, festivals, and dietary laws were a shadow but Christ is the reality (Colossians 2)? Yes.
Do I believe that God has now established a "new” covenant, making the first one obsolete (Hebrews 8:13)? Yes.
Do I believe this is a covenant not of written laws, but of the Spirit (2 Corinthians 3:6). Yes.
Do I believe the righteous requirement of the law are fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh or letter of the law but according to the Spirit (Romans 8:4). Yes.
Do I believe salvation, sanctification, or holiness is earned by obedience to the Mosaic law? No. (Galatians 3).
Am I outside of God's law? No. I am under the law of Christ (1 Corinthians 9:21)
What is the law of Christ? (Galatians 5 & 6).
@@Refuteitso it’s ok to eat pork and selfish?
@@RefuteitI admire your work my brother, you are definitely apart of the body of Christ! ☝🏽I feel sorry for these lost individuals blatantly ignoring the truth.
@@Refuteitwhat is the definition of the mosaic law?
@ekluksdahl --- The answer is in your question, "mosaic" law which is also know as the "written code" (Romans 7:6) the "ministry of death" carved on stone (2 Corinthians 3:7) which is the law and covenant that Moses received and Israel followed (2 Corinthians 3)
We are now under a New Covenant with greater glory than the Mosaic Law/Covenant. We are under a covenant led by the Spirit which empowers us and is not based on our self-effort, but on faith and grace. So that we are now people that avoid the ways that lead to death and destruction (aka: sin). Read 2nd Corinthians chapter 3 in your favorite translation for more detail. The Mosaic law/covenant has expired and we are now under a new way made available through Christ.
Is that group called natsarim?
Yes. Some call themselves that.
Jesus saves!
In my Language we call him JESUS. By scripture language, is the same as Ii̱soús
Its funny how the yashua cult rushed in to replace the name above all names, clearly translated, yet they're say some other name in vain. There are people coming into churches and saying BOTH names after they pray, what an abomination. There was a jewish lady that died in Israel and she was rushed to the hospital. When she recovered she was clearly distraught and she approached one of her coworkers and said that she was very confused because when she was gone, she left her body and she said she saw JESUS, then she began to cry. She said that very name. She was confused because in her OWN WORDS "I'm a jew and we are taught to HATE Jesus", to NEVER say that name and to refer to him by a derogatory slur. His name is the LORD, JESUS CHRIST.
For there is ONE name under heaven by which you are save, the name above every name, JESUS CHRIST.
Thank you for sharing!
so if I say yeshua its bad yeah?
@partysimpson5154 --- That is actually the Hebrew/Aramaic name that has the most evidence.
However, it becomes "bad" if you demand others only use that name as a legalistic requirement or go around telling people God will not hear them when they pray or they cannot be saved unless they use that name, as so many sacred namers do. That is the nonsense we refute on this channel along with the pride and Gnosticism of pushing secret knowledge and magical mantras to reach God.
So, if Yeshua is the name you use for yourself, then that is fine.
@@Refuteit
Paul, a pronounced Hebrew scholar and the most learned and astute of his day wrote the name of the person that knocked him off his horse and struck him blind, Iesus.
Written in HIS own hand. If the name was this Yiddish invention, I'm sure someone who KNEW him....like say, his BROTHER James, would have corrected everyone.
I've heard the excuses for why we all need to pronounce it "correctly" and they're all bunk. It ONLY his name that want change. They say things "there was no "J" in the Hebrew alphabet...but curiously they don't want to be called Yews, or Yuda, or Yeremiah. And assuming we're all playing this new game, "Yoshua" or "Joshua, is the false messiah the "YEWS" are waiting for and think that if they build the 3rd temple (which will NEVER happen) that he's magically appear.
It's astonishing how easy it is to TEST this but it's even MORE astonishing how virtue signaling everyone is what it comes to this.
@TheCountofToulouse --- You raise great points that I have said similarly to others about how easy it is to just look in the New Testament and see what is in the Greek and then to understand that Latin and English is how we pronounce that name in our vernacular. It is not rocket science. However, people can't do that because they despise anything other than Hebrew, to include the Greek New Testament.
I also like how you bring up "virtue signaling" because that is a lot of what I see as well. They want to join either the Yahuah group or the Yahweh group or the Yehovah group and then look down on others, divide, and argue how they are far more enlightened than the rest. These are the games that need to end.
I also agree that this Third Temple hysteria and claims that sacrifices will be re-introduced is not a good thing considering the message of the Gospel. There are not two ways to salvation, one for the Jews and another for gentiles as some teach.
I have a new video coming out soon to escalate the refute of all this sacred name cult nonsense, so please be on the watch.
My heart told me it was wrong, so I came here to get more facts. Just felt uneasy saying it; sounds like some Black Israelite heresy.
@JohnSmith-bm6zg --- I am glad you came. I hope you received the information you were looking for and it has helped you find truth on this subject and others that may be on your heart and mind. Continue to watch other videos as well.
Run to Yahusha!
@Dave Messenger Run to who? There is no such person in the Bible or history with that name. Yet, I have numerous historic accounts giving the correct pronunciation in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic, going into the first century AD and BC era.
You people lack evidences and historical, archaeological proofs.
There is no Yahusha in New Testament.
@Lion of Yahudah Calm down. people on this channel are smart enough to see that you are in fact not providing proof, you are spewing out unsubstantiated rhetoric that you are parroting from books and videos from a guy that invented Yahuah and Yahusha in the 21st century.
@Lion of Yahudah You need to know the difference between opinion and facts. Your statement that the entire Bible was written in Paleo Hebrew is your opinion, it is not fact. The Bible was written in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek.
Additionally, the point of the Septuagint being an additional and useful resource is because it is a Greek translation of the Old Testament that was not based on the Masoretic Hebrew, but on a much older Hebrew text. It was also the Old Testament used by the apostles and early church. And, even though the Septuagint is a much older text, it still does not support your false teachings or false names, but actually debunks your opinions.
Finally, Christianity is not based on the religion of Roman Catholicism. That again, is your opinion based on speculation supported by zero facts. Anyone that spent a small amount of reading in the New Testament could clearly see that Christianity pre-dates the Catholic Church. I suggest you spend more time reading the New testament.
@Endtime Watchmen All your evidence is nothing more than the tetragrammaton (YHWH). That is not evidence that the pronunciation is YAHUAH. In fact, I know it is not Yahuah because it violates Hebrew grammar rules. I also know it is not Yahuah based on Exodus chapter 3. th-cam.com/video/A_E4y0fzj8I/w-d-xo.html
Our Lord is omnicient and knows our hearts even if we by error use the wrong pronunciation of His name.
As for those making up names that are not even in the original scriptures, please go study biblical Hebrew. Yahusha is not a Hebrew word or name. It is made up and used by people operating in the spirit of anti-Christ to bring confusion and division to God's people.
Do as the Word commands, "study to show yourself approved".
For additional Content on this subject please see the following videos:
th-cam.com/video/zHVlDaxheD8/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/iCS36vDeJIA/w-d-xo.html
THE KJV WAS CHANGED AND BOOKS REMOVED!
YOU KNOW THE MESSIAH IS HEBREW
@Dorrie You are right, the KJV did remove books. The 1611 KJV had the Apocrypha in it all the way til 1828, and then it was removed.
And of course the Messiah is Hebrew, he is also the Savior that died so that the world can be saved, which includes the people of every tribe, nation, and language. He does not demand the world take Hebrew lessons before they come to him to be saved.
YAHUAH💥YAHUSHA 🔥
@R Barabanoff Those names do not exist in the scriptures. Go see the links at the pinned comment.
@Endtime Watchmen I am already familiar with Steven Rudd's website. And his archaeological work in Israel. You should continue reading more of his site. I am pretty sure he would join me in debunking what you are teaching.
Im also faced with this concern as im being told not pray in the name of Jesus. 🤦🏻♀️ I was also told that the word God is not good. I cant weite😔that here
Don't listen to people that tell you the word of God is not good or those that condemn you for praying in English and using the name of Jesus. They are all false teachers. For centuries believers have used the name of Jesus and now all of a sudden in these last days you have false teachers condemning a name the church has used successfully for generations.
@@Refuteit thank you.. I was actually praying in the name if Yahusha this week. I felt i was adressing thr Son of God. But still i have my doubts. Its so true all this is coming up esp in the last days howveer🙄years ago ive seen various ppl talk abt this too. Hope ita fine i write this hear, i was told tjat the name Jesus was purposely added taking out Yahusha bcoz in Latin it meant ( I cannot say it..... 😔) I was shocked. But i also wondered why the original name of our Father God and Jesus was changed. Other religions dont change in most languages same name. Only our Saviour. 😢
The best thing you can do is to stop listening to these people that have no clue what they are talking about when it comes to the name of God. Their stories and rewrite of history are very wrong. They portray God as a tyrant that demands everyone speak Hebrew or go to hell for praying in a non-Hebrew language. There is no such doctrine found in the scriptures. In fact, God has used several languages to get his message out to the world.
I forgive you for your accusations! I refuse to assume anyone to be an antichrist over a disagreement! HE says to love one another! Disagreeing with someone is not considered to be hateful!!
GOD is a witness to my efforts to understand HIM more deeply!!
@davidelliott8747 --- If you are advocating for people to see the New Testament as full of error or not the original text, or any similar conspiracy theory, then that is more than just a disagreement about a doctrine.
If you are advocating for people to follow a man or a movement that will teach things counter to what we find in scripture, then that is more than a disagreement.
So, let's not candy coat what you are implying or play victim. There is no such name as Yahuah and the New testament was originally written in Greek and is reliable in preserving the original message of God.
It was Yeshua or Yehoshua…..I am messianic and hold to to the truth of scripture. We keep a real sabbath and do go along with the Catholic Church that worships the sun God…..but I also can’t stand the sacred namer cult stuff. I came to know YHWH via Sunday church and Jesus BUT it is very wrong and corrupted. The word of God can be trusted, but it’s been twisted. Anyway, I like this video because the ya-HU-sha stuff really bugs me.
I don't know what part of "Not up for debate" you don't understand? You have NO understanding.
@Stella This is our ministry channel, so whenever someone makes a comment, we reserve the right to comment as needed. We make that determination, you don't. If you cannot agree to that, then you can make your comments on another channel.
@Lion of Yahudah As stated previously, this is our ministry channel and it is our right to respond to whatever comment. No one has the right to come on our channel and tell us we can't comment.
Endtime Watchmen Actually, my understanding about the errors of the Sacred Name movement is pretty good.
@@SuperUnknown905 why does it matter SO MUCH to have the proper pronunciation??? Why does salvation hinge on being able to say his name perfectly? That’s not biblical.
Inhale and exhale now what did you just say ?
Those were your first words when you were born .....
@JB-ot5eu --- False! Stop listening to these people online that know nothing about Hebrew and are making up myths about the name of God and the Hebrew language.
Here is Dr. Michael Brown, which is a scholar of ancient Semitic languages and he debunks this nonsense about inhaling and exhaling God's name. th-cam.com/users/clipUgkx4cLcWvs8YDAIcn-lFTFxjlyOybfAaWXn?si=Z7pjByXNPkAOHh3d
Thank you for sharing!
Honestly all this is so confusing
Don't let anyone confuse you with their false doctrines, stick to the word of God and attend a church that will confirm everything they teach is from the word of God.
Calling in the name of Jesus Christ works for me, demons run away and people all of a sudden change mental state, you have to see them 🤣
Beware of this “yahuah”, “Yahshua” nonsense for the record, once again, THERE IS NO SUCH NAME AS YAHSHUA. It didn’t exist in biblical times and it has not existed as a genuine Hebrew name in history - until people who really didn’t understand Hebrew made it up, thinking that it somehow restored the “Yah” element (from “Yahweh”) into the Savior’s name. there’s no such either as Yahushua - Joshua was pronounced ye-ho-shu-ah - and God’s name was NEVER pronounced Yahua or the like.
Theres no Yahweh too.. I just learned from dr Gene Kim.
@Gasper Forever --- Genes Kim is wrong if that is what he is teaching. There is strong evidence that Yahweh is the correct pronunciation of God's name in Hebrew. The other names by the sacred namers (yahu, Yahusha, etc.) are fake and without historic and linguistic evidence.
I am so glad I found your channel. I heard this woman speaking on a you tube video claiming the lie that I had to use Yahusha. All I know is this, she is wrong, not because I am learned, scholarly, smart, just one thing. I had a child like innocent faith and needed a healing. I asked God to heal me in Jesus name. Jesus came to me and I was healed by his name, JESUS CHRIST OF NAZARETH. Just the name I had a life changing encounter with Jesus. He is not dead, HE IS ALIVE, Jesus came to me and healed me. HE IS THE SON OF GOD and the Bible is true. So I knew the woman teaching that only Yahusha was then name to use was wrong, but YOURS is the first explanation of why. I thank God for your channel.
Thank you for sharing your testimony of healing and your experience.
JESUS is less than 500 years old, yet highly accepted. It mean nothing at best - by sounds suspiciously similar to "the horse" to someone familiar with Hebrew.
There is no letter double-u in Eberith, yet there is a reference to Yahweh commonly preferred by English teachers of the four vowels, yod-hay-uau-hay (YHUH).
The form YESHUA (H3444) is found as a common word for salvation, and certainly not a word worthy of being stoned to death over. This is a noun seen as the last word in Psalm 91. The five-lettered name invented by Mushah for his assistant at Numbers 13:16 (see interlinear for proof of this) is spelled yod-hay-uau-shin-ayin, but usually seen written in the Aramith script we brought back from our captivity in Babel. YAHUSHA is the closest and simplest expression of these 5 Eberith letters. YESHUA is not the correct name for obvious reasons. All it means is "salvation." Yahusha declares "I am your Deliverer."
The high priest mentioned at ZekarYah 3 was YAHUSHA, not YESHUA.
@Lew White --- Really Lew? Are you really going to keep using these sacred namer urban myths to bash the name of Jesus? First, I have to say, so what if the name of Jesus is 200, 500 or a 1,000 years old? What does that matter? It’s true that English is a new language in comparison to many other languages, but does that make it unholy? If that is how you feel, then stop using English and only speak and write in Paleo-Hebrew. Also, keep in mind that the Holy Spirit allowed people to hear about the wonders of God in their native language - multiple languages (Acts 2:5-12). God used their own language to reach them, not Hebrew! A scriptural debunk against your claim that only Hebrew is supreme or that we need to only speak in Hebrew to get right with God.
Second, I am sure that you are aware that Jesus is English (not Hebrew), which is derived from the early Greek and later Latin to English (Iesus --- see the similarity? Jesus - Iesus), so why use Hebrew to interpret its meaning? The origin of Jesus is from the original Greek New Testament. You know, all those inspired books written by the apostles and early followers of Christ in Greek, for the Greek speaking world at that time.
Third, Jesus does not mean horse in Hebrew. Horse in Hebrew is “soos” not Jesus. All you are doing is playing a game by taking the word from one language and trying to match it with some sound in Hebrew for the purposes of discrediting the meaning behind that name. That is childish Lew! I could easily play that same childish game with your name as well, because Lew is “suspiciously similar” to “if” (lu) in Hebrew. You know, as in you are an “iffy” person, aka a person with dubious authentication. Do you see how your name game works when it is applied to you, Lew? Not so great or funny anymore, is it?
Fourth, regardless of what you claim. There is no one ever mentioned in the Bible with the name Yahusha. You will not find a legitimate ancient text with that name. Joshua was pronounced: ye-ho-shu-ah, not yod-hay-uau-shin-ayin. Yahusha is a modern fabricated word that you perpetuate and is actually a blasphemy. So, you can continue to ignore all of the volumes of scholarly articles, books, and native speakers that apply the correct pronunciation of biblical names, but what does that say about your character? I have many verses I could quote about stubbornness and about those who refuse correction and instruction for you to read.
@@Refuteit We can not make a fake uninspired name receive our attention. The source of Truth the inspired Hebrew. JESUS has no meaning, and many Christian pastors have said so in recent years; it only tracks to the mid 16th century. Teachers have to resort to Greek, which is a translation (therefore not inspired), and Greek cannot transliterate the true Name Yahusha, having no way to sound "SH."
It also adds an ending S to the fake name to make it masculine, according to the rules of Greek. Calling on the Name Yahusha was forbidden because of the YAH component in it. YESHUA is a common Hebrew word for "salvation," and no one would be arrested and stoned for saying that.
Look at the interlinear of Numbers 13:16 to see the first use of the name YAHUSHA, which Mushah called his assistant HUSHA.
Use inspired Hebrew, not uninspired Greek and Latin to teach, and words will make sense. YAHUSHA has a meaning, but JESUS has no meaning in any language. It is most probable that Inigo Loyola S.J. made JESUS a popular word, since he named his sect after the IESU form in the Latin Vulgate, "SOCIETAS IESU." Expose the error of the Jesuits, please don't promote their false teachings.
@ Lew White - (1) For the second time, Jesus is the English version of Iesus, which appears in the inspired Greek New Testament multiple times. If you don’t like the fact that the apostles wrote in Greek, then you need to get over it, because that is the language God used to reach the world and to spread the Gospel. The world did not speak Hebrew, they spoke Greek, the common language of that era, and God wanted to ensure the world heard the good news about Jesus Christ in a language they understood.
(2) I don’t know what “Christian Pastors” you are listening to, but who cares if modern Christian pastors speak negative about the name of Jesus and claim it has no meaning. They must be ignorant of history and the development of the English language. My question to you is , why do you hate and attack the English language so much? You speak English but you bash it.
(3) So what if ancient Greek speakers could not pronounce a Hebrew name the same as a Hebrew speaker. Why is it important for you to make a big deal about that? Do you think we all need to say some secret Hebrew code to enter heaven or God will rejects us? Does the world need to learn Hebrew to be saved? If you believe any of that then you do not know the love and true nature of God.
Let me repeat to you what I have previously shared, which you must have ignored. In Acts chapter 2, the Holy Spirit did not use Hebrew to reach people. The Holy Spirit reached people by allowing them to hear about the wonders of God in their own native language. Not one language, but multiple languages were used to reach each person. Additionally, listen to the end time message of the Elders in heaven as recorded in the Book of Revelation chapter 5 verse 9. They offer praise to Christ for redeeming people from every language (tongue) tribe and nation---not just those that speak Hebrew. Your obsession with Hebrew being the only holy language is legalistic and biblical history proves that God does not share your opinion since he has used many languages to save the world. Your obsession with Hebrew is unbiblical.
(4) Funny how you are a non-native Hebrew speaker, trying to tell Hebrew speakers and Semitic language experts how to speak Hebrew. You make up “Hebrew names” that do not and have not existed and you make up grammatical rules for a language you do not speak, yet somehow you are comfortable elevating yourself as a Hebrew language expert.
(5) For your information, the “Yah” element that you mentioned, does not work the way you think it does in regards to a Hebrew name. Therefore, what you claim about the Hebrew name for Joshua and Jesus is far from accurate. There were many people in the Bible with the name Yeshua and the Greek equivalent of that name is seen as well. I have over 5,000 Greek New Testament text, the Septuagint, and the Peshitta to back up what I know. Your evidence is non-existent.
(6) You say that Jesus has no meaning in any language? LOL!! The world does not share your opinion. Multiple people from around the world call out to Jesus in prayer in their native tongue. Do an internet search on the name for Christ to see how many use the name of Jesus in their language and you will see multiple languages use that same English name or a close representative of that name. Is God who wants all the world to be saved going to reject these people because they don’t say the secret name that you invented? The answer is no! God will hear these people who simply cry out in their own native language, calling up the name of the savior they know, which died for their sins. Daniel 7:14 states that Jesus will be given a dominion, glory, and a kingdom, and that all people, nations and LANGUAGES will serve him. In this future kingdom, Jesus does not make everyone speak Hebrew. Jesus is comfortable with people speaking a foreign language in his kingdom.
(7) Wow! You can’t give up these sacred namer urban myths, can you? So, now your claim is that the Jesuits made the name of Jesus popular. LOL! Let me prove how silly that statement is. The name of Jesus appears in the Wyciffe Bible, which dates back to 1382 AD and the Jesuits were founded over 150 years later. So, the name of Jesus was popular long before the Jesuits, thus debunking your sacred namer urban myth.
Please don't respond by just repeating yourself. I am not going to waste my time saying the same thing to your over and over again because you only have a limited number of points to make to support your claims.
Look again yesshua followers Read the first chapter of the Bible it says the word was and it was god, and I’m orthdox and I call him Jesus not some kind of funny name repent kids.
@EeeAlr -- They call him by a fabricated name (Yahusha) that never existed in Hebrew or Aramaic. Thanks for sharing your comment.
If you refuse to let us hear your voice and see your face I have no Faith in your words.
@DoBetterAndDoMore --- So, is that the excuse you're telling yourself as to why you dismiss the message of the video?
#1) Your faith should not be based on the words of any human, but rather on the word of God.
"And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God." (1 Corinthians 2:4-5)
#2) By claiming you only believe things when you actually see and hear a person speak, is a likely indicator that you accept truth based on the charisma of the speaker and how that person makes you feel (goosebump theology), rather than biblical truth. Remember, the Bible tells us "but test everything; hold fast what is good." (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
#3) Funny how you can watch an entire video (if you did at all) and not have any comment relevant to the scriptural discussions, historic content, and grammatical explanations. No! Let's not talk about all the relevant biblical stuff, let's instead talk about how you dismiss everything because you dislike how the video was produced. Yet, you probably accepted everything in a cheaply made video with a guy talking nonsense and playing a guitar at the end (hint).
"Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment." (John 7:24)
This statement was made for another video and not this one concerning Christ’s true name.
“Since God decided to use the Greek language” 🧐 ….whaat 😅.
@SModex777 ---- So are you saying it is impossible for God to plan how his message is to be sent around the world?
# 1. The entire Old Testament was translated into Greek and distributed around the world in time for the all the New Testament writers to quote from it (as they did) and for Jews around the world (who spoke Greek) to use it as well, rather than the Hebrew.
#2. There is ZERO evidence that the original New Testament was written in Hebrew, Aramaic, or any other language other than Greek, there may have been translations after the original writings but Greek was what the New Testament writers used because the world (even Jews) understood Greek, so it was the best language to use to spread the Gospel.
These are all facts proven by historic and physical evidence. Do the research from ***credible sources*** and you will see the truth for yourself.
@SModex777 --- Just because you want something to be true, that does not make it true. Just because you convinced yourself that you are right, that does not make you right. Just because you don't like the truth, that does not give you the right to change the truth, based on your opinions alone.
You say, "Just because there might be zero evidence of something doesn’t make it not true."
So, will you accept that same logic when you are convicted of something in a court of law? Would you be okay with a judge telling you the government does not have evidence against you, but we don't need evidence because we still think you did it? Even worst, what if you had a ton of evidence that you are innocent and the government had zero evidence, but they still tell you "Just because there might be zero evidence of something doesn’t make it not true." Would you accept that answer and go happily off to jail?
Why would you make a stand on opinion and speculation that has zero evidence, to fight against a well established truth that has a mountain of evidence that confirms the truth? Should that not cause you to take a pause, search your heart and test what you think is true?
You said, "make sure not to give false information and say it’s factual." Well, I think you should take your own advice and do it. Scripturally, by doing what you are doing, that is defined as a sin, "You shall not spread a false report." Exodus 23:1
Study the facts and evidence from reliable sources. Heed the scriptures that tell you to "reject foolish and ignorant speculation..." 2 Timothy 2:23
@SModex777 --- I usually do not support the promotion of other videos in comments, but I did view the videos you mentioned. However, I saw no difference from what they were saying in their videos about the name of God in comparison to any other sacred namer's video.
The first video used all the same silly arguments like the name of Jesus means earth pig, and that if you travel your name is always the same in every country, that the "us" is Greek points to Zeus. However, the guy tried to have it both ways by saying "I am not saying this, BUT...." All comical stuff that has been debunked over and over again.
In the second video, I was trying to figure out the guys approach because he would cite resources, but those resources actually disagreed with his points. I didn't get that part. However, most of his video was nonsense because all he was doing was showing the constants for the name Joshua while displaying his version of the name on the screen and saying "look it says Yahushua" "Look here is the Dead Sea scrolls with the name Joshua and it says, Yahushua!" My response is NO, you are showing the constants of the name and just imposing your own invented name in the constants. You proved nothing.
So, as I said, with those two videos there is nothing new under the sun. Same old rhetoric, same lack of knowledge of how Hebrew, Greek, and Latin works, same silly arguments about the name of Jesus.
All these videos do is create doubt in the minds of people about God's word and preach another gospel that turns the name of God into a magical incantation. That is why this thought pattern and these type of teachings are cults.
You may have good intentions and have pure motivations to honor God, but the only thing you will find from people that produce videos like you shared or in any other sacred name camp are false teachers that will lead you astray and put you under a curse (Galatians 3:10) by encouraging you to follow a works based salvation through the law and a false-messiah that is not the Messiah in the New Testament. Again, that is why my videos warn people that this is a cult, so that they take this stuff serious and know this is not a game but has serious eternal consequences.
My suggestions is that you take a more critical approach when you watch a video and test everything. Don't let somebody just flash things up on the video and say, "see here it is." Is it really there? Dive deeper.
I hope that answered your questions.
I don't feel peace in this video.
@loriey9746 --- So, you only believe and accept things according to your feelings? Is your salvation based on how you feel today and subject to change depending on how you feel tomorrow? What about truth? Is that confirmed by good feelings or perhaps goosebumps on your arms?
I don't recall a verse that tells us to forsake scripture and rely on how we feel about things.
Scripture does state:
"For we walk by faith, not by sight." (2 Corinthians 5:7)
"Those who trust their own insight are foolish, but anyone who walks in wisdom is safe. (Proverbs 28:26)
"Trust in the LORD with all your heart; do not depend on your own understanding." (Proverbs 3:5)
That is the difference between you picking and choosing doctrine based on "feelings" and how God tells you can know what is true doctrine. Scripture (God's Word)!
@@Refuteit how about the effect of the Qodesh Spirit? You should feel peace and not confused man. And everything you have mentioned, dyou think I don't know that? You immediately judged me based on a simple phrase I have mentioned, lol. It seems like you're the one who needs to read more of these. As a seeker myself, I've been to a lot of different churches, I even got baptized (mostly Christian religion). However, these churches that I've been through don't celebrate the festival of the Most High which is written and even commanded by Himself to all of our generations. Like for example the Sukkot, that even the Messiah Himself celebrated. I don't wanna say His name here as I guess it's provoking for you. But like what i said, no religions out there taught me what are the festivals that need to be celebrated and what is not as everyone's teachings are almost the same. I used to be a Jehovah's witnesses as a kid, and I guess of all the religions out there, their teachings are the closest to what's in the bible. However, they don't celebrate the festivals as well. Even though they also know about pagan festivals that are being celebrated by most Christian religions out there, like Christmas. I respect them if that's their belief, but for me, I have my own belief based on my research and with the help of our Creator's guidance of the Spirit. As I have mentioned, I am a seeker who loves to read His words and making sure that His hebrew name is written on it. Keeping His Turah is His love language and if you seek further you'll know. Most religions nowadays are mixing lies and truths so be vigilant and you'll determine it by simply observing their festivals. Shalum brother.
@loriey9746 --- Thanks for proving my point. Anyone who says: the Jehovah's witnesses "teachings are the closest to what's in the bible." Has serious spiritual discernment issues and a lack of knowledge about the Bible.
That is why your idea that "You should feel peace and not confused" is not working for you. If you are confused then you need to get instruction, not move to another church were you "feel" better. That is why you say: "As a seeker myself, I've been to a lot of different churches." You are looking for truth and for God in all the wrong ways. It's not biblical.
Now, you are into one more error, which is following the Judaizers. Don't you read the Bible and see what it says about putting yourself under the Mosaic covenant?
Understand this, if you put yourself under the law, the law requires you to keep ALL of it. You can't say I am commanded to just follow the feast days. No. That is not how it works. Over and over again, we are warned that if we put ourselves under the Mosaic laws, we MUST do everything in them, which is impossible to keep. We are actually told we no longer are under those laws that you claim you're commanded to follow. We serve under a new way by the Spirit and under the laws of Christ.
Here is proof you are not under law:
"For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one point, he has become guilty of ALL" (James 2:10)
"And I testify again to every man receiving-circumcision that he is a debtor to do the WHOLE Law" (Galatians 5:3)
Additionally, here is what is said about the Mosaic law.
"When God speaks of a “new” covenant, it means he has made the first one obsolete." (Hebrews 8:13)
"He has enabled us to be ministers of his new covenant. This is a covenant not of written laws, but of the Spirit. The old written covenant ends in death; but under the new covenant, the Spirit gives life." (2 Corinthians 3:6)
"But now we have been released from the law, for we died to it and are no longer captive to its power. Now we can serve God, not in the old way of obeying the letter of the law, but in the new way of living in the Spirit." (Romans 7:6)
"For they don’t understand God’s way of making people right with himself. Refusing to accept God’s way, they cling to their own way of getting right with God by trying to keep the law." (Romans 10:3)
"Don't let anyone tell you what you must eat or drink. Don't let them say you must celebrate the New Moon festival, the Sabbath, or any other festival. These things are only a shadow of what was to come. But Christ is real! (Colossians 2:17)
So, you need to study and be taught. Not chase feelings.
@@Refuteit so what's your religion then? Why did the Messiah been called Jesus if it's not His name in Hebrew? Since u love educating people and acting as if you know everything even the hearts and minds of people, tell me more. Like what i have mentioned I am a seeker and I'm seeking the truth. Everyone has something to say about the scripture and debating endlessly claiming they are the TRUTH. Tell me more about the TRUTH that u know then. Because basically if this is the case, then the bible was actually contradicting itself? Because as written, the Turah or Laws are FOREVER and needs to be kept for all generations. Forever. All generations. And the Messiah didn't abolish the laws but fulfilled it. Anyways, I really wanna know more. Maybe you can email me or if you have telegram where we can have this discussion. My purpose here is not to argue but to learn. Because if the bible contradicts itself, maybe it's about time to try different beliefs then like Buddhism or Hinduism. Like what I said, I'm open. As long as it's the truth.
@loriey9746 --- The Bible is not “contradicting itself” as you think. God had a plan from the very beginning to save the entire world and the law was incapable of saving people:
“The law of Moses was unable to save us because of the weakness of our sinful nature. So God did what the law could not do. He sent his own Son in a body like the bodies we sinners have. And in that body God declared an end to sin’s control over us by giving his Son as a sacrifice for our sins.” (Romans 8:3)
You say: “Laws are FOREVER and needs to be kept for all generations. Forever. All generations.”
My Response: The Hebrew word Olam does not always mean “forever” but can also mean a hidden time, a time beyond the horizon (til a future period) or until a new age to come. Context determines the application of the word. So, since we have the revelation of the New Testament explaining that the law of Moses had a temporary function and that we are not obligated to follow the feast days, dietary laws, Sabbaths, and ceremonies, we can get a better understanding that God had a better plan for us then living under the yoke of the law (Acts 15:10). We instead live by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9)
Verses that show the law had a temporary or limited function:
“So the law was our guardian until Christ came that we might be justified by faith. Now that this faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian [the law].” (Galatians 3:24-25)
“Why, then, was the law given at all? It was added because of transgressions until the Seed [Jesus] to whom the promise referred had come.” (Galatians 3:19)
“Yes, the old requirement about the priesthood was set aside because it was weak and useless. For the law never made anything perfect. But now we have confidence in a better hope, through which we draw near to God.” (Hebrews 7:18-19)
“For that old system deals only with food and drink and various cleansing ceremonies-physical regulations that were in effect only until a better system could be established.” (Hebrews 9:10)
“Therefore no one will be declared righteous in God’s sight by the works of the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of our sin.” (Romans 3:20)
You say: “And the Messiah didn't abolish the laws but fulfilled it.”
My Response: Jesus did fulfill them but probably not in the same way you are thinking about fulfillment.
“For Christ has already accomplished the purpose for which the law was given. As a result, all who believe in him are made right with God.” (Romans 10:4)
“He did this by ending the system of law with its commandments and regulations. He made peace between Jews and Gentiles by creating in himself one new people from the two groups.” (Ephesians 2:14-16)
“Don't let anyone tell you what you must eat or drink. Don't let them say you must celebrate the New Moon festival, the Sabbath, or any other festival. These things are only a shadow of what was to come. But Christ is real [or the reality of these shadows]! (Colossians 2:16-17)
So, when Jesus said he fulfilled the law, that means he completed its purpose and transformed it into something better, which was God’s original plan. “
Remember, scripture also says, “This is what I mean: the law, which came 430 years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void.” (Galatians 3:17)
So, the law does not supersede the covenant of faith that God made before the law was introduced. We are under this covenant of grace and faith, which is not by our works of the law. “For if the inheritance could be received by keeping the law, then it would not be the result of accepting God’s promise.” (Galatians 3:18)
We still have three uses of the law, so we do not cast it aside as worthless. It is not a way of salvation nor is it a way to please God, earn points, to be set apart, sanctified, or maintain your salvation. Grace through faith in Christ alone accomplishes all of that not the law. The law cannot save anyone.
Therefore, you can rest from trying to be good enough for God. There is nothing you can do to earn his favor. Instead, you have a perpetual Sabbath rest in the fulfilled (finished) works of Christ as your savior and righteousness.
Does that mean we have a license to sin? Not at all! Our faith will produce good works and love for God and for our neighbors (people). These good works do not come from following demands from a law, but by the Spirit of God operating in you and through you to bless the world.
Is Yeshua in the Bible? Just wondering.
@Marie Rejoice in Jesus Yes, you will find Yeshua in 1 Chronicles 24:11, 2 Chronicles 31:15, Ezra 2:2, 2:6, 2:36, 2:40, 3:2, 3:8-9, 4:4, 8:33, 10:18, Nehemiah 3:19, 7:7, 7:11, 7:39, 7:43, 8:7, 8:17, 9:4, 10:9, 11:26, 12:1, 12:7, 12:8, 12:10, 12:24, and 12:26. However, you will won't see it in an English translation because they will render it in the English form of the name, but you will see it in the Hebrew/Aramaic, which you should be able to view on biblehub. You can see it in Greek by looking up these passages in the Septuagint at studybible.info. I hope that answers your question. Thank you for watching the video and commenting.
Thanks for the Talk.Lew. again to much vipism...
Your next video should debunk YHWH = Satan.
Thank you for the suggestion. I will look into that.
HIS NAME IS YESHUA ..GET IT !
Amen. Yeshua Ben Yeosef. The Messiah.
HalleluYE? Or do you sing HalleluYAH ? And The saviour said...I come In the name of My Father and you dont believe me...He Must have his fathers name In his name...but yes...everyone believes Differently...your free to believe What you want...and the same to me...
@RockyDempers --- Your two examples prove two things.
#1. That you or the people that you listen to about the name Yahuah have no understanding how Hebrew grammar works, such as the difference between a prefix and suffix and how the two will differ in certain Hebrew words or names.
#2. That you or the people that taught you about John 5:43, have not used proper hermeneutical (interpretation) skills and therefore you both come to wrong conclusions about the meaning of that scripture verse, which leads you into faulty doctrines.
(((( Example of proper interpretations of John 5:43:))))
"He came in the name of, as representing, the Father" -- Ellicott's Commentary
"They could not appreciate and accept Jesus who came in God’s name, that is, who truly represented God." -- Expositor's Greek Testament
"I am come in my Father's name - By the authority of God; or giving proof that I am sent by him." -- Barne's Notes on the Bible
"I am come clothed with an authority from my Father, sent by him for this very purpose, to reveal his will to men for their salvation; I speak, I do nothing but by the authority of my Father which sent me; nor do I aim at my own glory, but the glory of him that sent me: yet you give no credit to my words, nor embrace me, as him whom God hath sent for the Saviour of man." --- Matthew Poole's Commentary
"I am come in my Father's name,.... Power and authority; by his consent, with his will, and according to a covenant with him: Christ came not of himself, of his own accord, by a separate power and will of his own, but was called, and sent, and came by mutual agree meat; and brought his credentials with him, doing the works and miracles which his Father gave him to finish:" --- Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
" ‘I come with the highest credentials, as My Father’s representative (comp. John 8:42), and ye reject Me.’" --- Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
"I have come in the name (i.e. in the power, with the credentials, with the encompassing revelation) of my Father, and ye receive me not. " --- Pulpit Commentary
**** As you can see, no one says the verse is saying that the name of Christ is the same as the Father's name. That is not what the verse means and your interpretation distracts from the true message of the passage, which is that Christ operated under the blessings, mission, unity, and authority of the Father who is all Israel understood and reverenced. So, Christ did not act alone and based off his own ideas. A very important message. ***
With all this in mind and the examples shown by scholars of the Word, it’s clear that understanding Scripture requires us to use proper interpretation techniques. Misinterpretations will happen when we don’t pay attention to language details, like Hebrew grammar, or when we read our own ideas into the text instead of letting the verse speak for itself as the original writer intended for it to read.
It’s crucial for us to dive into the Scriptures considering the context and background of what we read. This way, we can avoid falling into the trap of faulty doctrines as so many do in this yahuah cult, trying to twist the meaning of the verse in an effort to create a "proof text" for their pet doctrine. Instead, let’s commit to being thoughtful students of the Word, seeking the true meaning of Scripture so that we can grow in faith based on sound doctrine.
So, it might be time for you to seek more reliable sources of information instead of relying on the Yahuah/Natsarim cult, which emphasizes a name that doesn't exist according to ancient Hebrew grammar. Unless however, you're okay with them disregarding established rules or creating their own grammar rules based on conspiracy theories and the fear of the mysterious "they" hiding the truth from you. So, it may be worth it for you to explore perspectives grounded in sound scholarship rather than uneducated speculation and the manipulation of God's word.
JESUS Christ !!!!!!!
Amen!!!
All these crazy people and their gods and odds with each other
Demons
Yeshua, Joshua = Jesus
@Margaret Baker Yeshua is Hebrew - Jesus is English from the Latin/Greek = Iesus (which is from the original Greek text written by the apostles). It is true that the English translation of Iesus would be Joshua, but to distinguish the Savior from Joshua (the man) English tradition has kept the Saviors name close to its Greek/Latin origin, thus we keep his name as: "Jesus" rather than fully translating it Joshua. So, Jesus is more accurate to the original text of the Bible than what people think.
Thankyou for sharing this brother. I'm gonna share this on Facebook.
They clearly lack truth, knowledge and wisdom.
@Reformed Theology Thank you for sharing.
Good thing you post a video refuting these false group of People
fake name of God
yahuah yahusha fake names
Thank you for sharing your comment