Thanks. Brings back memories of my water chemistry days. There is a lot of talk about carbon capture. Too much mechanical and not enough biological thinking. What we need are super bacteria that consume CO2 and methane.
Thanks for sharing this. I do have one picky comment, although it did affect my ability to watch: when you keep swaying back and forth, whether shifting your body or camera angle, it starts to make me dizzy and I had to block you out of my view so I could hear what was being said.
there's 1200 gigatons of pressurized methane in the world's largest ocean shelf - East Siberian Arctic Shelf - the latest Natalia Shakhova research group study shows the methane is already accelerating into the atmosphere out of ESAS.
What do the models predict since the 1st and subsequent estimates compared to actual data to present? This woukd be an indicator of prediction models temperature future accuracy.
@@mykota2417 Modeling means you have something identical or like to cast from. We don't have data showing what will happen with such sudden and spectacular ejections into the atmosphere.
@@therealdesidaruNo. Models are not a collection of past explorated in the future. It is math - e. g. you can modell present time without the extra c02.
@@gehwissen3975 Whatever. No one knows what will happen or what the time scale really looks like. NOAA announced that they can no longer make reliable models for weather outside of TEN HOURS. Ten hours. Ten minutes too late in the case of tornadoes. 24 hours too late in the case of Acapulco. You really want to throw your chickens in with a lot that says what it will be like in 10 years? Bust a nut.
Really brilliant and horrifying, validating of the extreme rapidity of our demise... Thank you
Excellent talk, thanks for sharing on TH-cam
grateful for the efforts made to share this Knowledge
Rly good work!
Thanks. Brings back memories of my water chemistry days. There is a lot of talk about carbon capture. Too much mechanical and not enough biological thinking. What we need are super bacteria that consume CO2 and methane.
Take good care of your fantasy friend. When they have eaten their way through to 280ppm - they should be stopped.
@@gehwissen3975 I know what you mean. My active dry yeast got out of control and took over my kitchen.
Synthesis, Summary?...hard to grasp...key points...?..whats the trend..?
Thanks for sharing this. I do have one picky comment, although it did affect my ability to watch: when you keep swaying back and forth, whether shifting your body or camera angle, it starts to make me dizzy and I had to block you out of my view so I could hear what was being said.
there's 1200 gigatons of pressurized methane in the world's largest ocean shelf - East Siberian Arctic Shelf - the latest Natalia Shakhova research group study shows the methane is already accelerating into the atmosphere out of ESAS.
What do the models predict since the 1st and subsequent estimates compared to actual data to present? This woukd be an indicator of prediction models temperature future accuracy.
We cant model what is happening. It's never happened before.
@@therealdesidaru 'Modelling' is a future prediction?
@@mykota2417 Modeling means you have something identical or like to cast from. We don't have data showing what will happen with such sudden and spectacular ejections into the atmosphere.
@@therealdesidaruNo.
Models are not a collection of past explorated in the future.
It is math - e. g. you can modell present time without the extra c02.
@@gehwissen3975 Whatever. No one knows what will happen or what the time scale really looks like. NOAA announced that they can no longer make reliable models for weather outside of TEN HOURS. Ten hours. Ten minutes too late in the case of tornadoes. 24 hours too late in the case of Acapulco. You really want to throw your chickens in with a lot that says what it will be like in 10 years? Bust a nut.
Life flourishes under warming.
And Humans die from heat stroke.
Martin Mark Taylor Edward Rodriguez Dorothy
ask your audience to guess repeatedly ,okay for a classroom maybe not so much for global distribution of new knowledge from an expert
The info is great, but you really got to find a way to make it more palatable for normal people. Too dull!
MNP movement coincides with climate change. Explain? Or at least explain why no scientist mentions it.