JA-37DI F21 In War Thunder : A Basic Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @gabrielgalvaodesouza5591
    @gabrielgalvaodesouza5591 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +98

    the mirage 2000 kill was nasty

    • @TimsVariety
      @TimsVariety  18 วันที่ผ่านมา +27

      1 on 1s are so damned rare, I knew I had to include that match.

  • @TheGrace020
    @TheGrace020 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +17

    Tim you are epic and the mirage outmaneuver kill was glorious 😻bless you

  • @derf5045
    @derf5045 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +14

    The viggen's FM has been nerfed to oblivion over the past years, so much so that in many cases i'd rather fly the draken because it turns better and looses less speed. (IRL in simulated dogfights, draken pilots had to pull the craziest ace combat style manouvers to stay relevant against the viggens)

  • @chemputer
    @chemputer 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    Regarding heavy fuel consumption planes, I think using the program WTRTI to show the fuel consumption rate at full AB vs half vs none would be really interesting. I've been using it for years now and it's lovely.
    Probably excessive, but thought I'd mention it.

  • @mikerobin7600
    @mikerobin7600 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +39

    It's a shame how much the viggen got powercrept. I remember playing it Back in the day , and Thinking that is a Close as i get to flying a ef2000

    • @Cythil
      @Cythil 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +10

      There is a reason why we in Sweden replaced with the Grippen. It was a good plane for it time. But it is not odd that a jet that first flew in 1967, before man had landed on the moon, have a hard time competing with more modern planes. Even with modernization.
      Well the Swedish tech tree often have a bit weird BR placement of stuff so we are used to all of this. ^_^

  • @PerformanceBlueOverYou
    @PerformanceBlueOverYou 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Good morning Tim☕️
    thanks for another review!

  • @ODST_Parker
    @ODST_Parker 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

    I will never understand why Gaijin didn't just add the Rb 99 to the existing JA 37D, then add the JA 37DI as the premium. The D variant was literally designed to carry them, and the DI had nothing to do with missile integration.
    This sets a very bad precedent for future copy/paste tech tree *and* premium vehicles going forward. Another example being the Italian F-16A getting some kind of "Late" tech tree version, then a premium F-16B or something like that.

    • @diobrando2575
      @diobrando2575 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Because it would've left a really nasty gap in BRs so players would jump from being 11.3 to 13.0, and until Gaijin finally decides to add in BRs being determined based on the loadout selected, it's the least worst option in my honest opinion.

    • @tezbertzero1915
      @tezbertzero1915 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@diobrando2575 Same, i'd rather playing Viggen D at his br than this one, missiles don't make it better.

    • @ODST_Parker
      @ODST_Parker 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@diobrando2575 There are already huge BR gaps all over the game, and Gaijin doesn't give a shit.
      This was for money, nothing more.

    • @Pvt_Wade
      @Pvt_Wade วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      jas39a is also missing aim120
      they want you to grind the same vehicle twice just to get a missile they already had irl

    • @ODST_Parker
      @ODST_Parker วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Pvt_Wade Same with the F-15A, which could get the same MSIP upgrade as the C, but likely never will because then it'll essentially be the same plane in all significant aspects.
      I don't expect *every* plane to be updated to its ultimate version with the most modern weapons it was *ever* capable of carrying. Some vehicles are introduced as something of a historical snapshot of the vehicle at a specific point in time. The problem with the Italian F-16A is that it *never* existed in the configuration it has in the game now.

  • @Urssaff
    @Urssaff 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Unfortunately, as a lot of planes in the higher brs you need the br ceiling to get significantly up

  • @ReaperChi3f
    @ReaperChi3f 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +11

    No HMD at 13.0 is a disaster...

    • @KoiR2Y2
      @KoiR2Y2 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      It’s inconvenient but idk if I’d call it a disaster.
      Try playing the Thai f16, it has no hmd at 13.7. The absolute nerve 😐

    • @ondrejpokluda2877
      @ondrejpokluda2877 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I never use HMD in realistic battles and im not even sure how i would use it, could you elaborate in what situation do you use it?

    • @PerformanceBlueOverYou
      @PerformanceBlueOverYou 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@ondrejpokluda2877 it’s great for locking onto targets below you while maintaining level flight. What it is even better for is acquiring a target mid turn. You can be maneuvering and selecting exactly who you want to engage while they are highly off bore sight. The advantages are even higher when coupled with missiles that pull super hard off the rails/have thrust vectoring.

    • @lelandcheng9187
      @lelandcheng9187 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ondrejpokluda2877 its arguablly the most vital feature in any missle fight under 20km, especially for throwing fox3 or ir missiles offbore. short answer is that its much faster than ACM because you can use your eyes on VR or with tobi eye track to lock targets with your eyes at close range or with your mouse cursor, much faster than having to put your nose on target to use ACM to lock someone at close range

  • @HueWave
    @HueWave 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    i play with this and i love it, once you get comfortable with it and realize what you are flying, you can genuinely rack 2/3 kills per match by doing asymmetrical stuff, (ambushing from the side of the maps, flying high to bait then going low and behind the team to take out the enemy whos busy with your teammates, etc etc.

    • @YungRolex
      @YungRolex 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Exactly.
      I got a 2.0 kd with it easily.

  • @Amexel
    @Amexel 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    I know this plane isn't very meta to say the least, but I adore it so much regardless.

  • @YungRolex
    @YungRolex 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The ja37di worked out really well for me in 11.7 squadron battles.
    Honestly not a bad plane.

  • @theDarkside798
    @theDarkside798 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +11

    At 13.0 its a sitting duck. Fighing EF2000, Rafales and F-15Es is like going with an T-34 against an Leopard 2.

    • @francescodibattista896
      @francescodibattista896 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      I'd compare the DI to a M60 upgunned to 120mm against leo2a7

    • @soldat88hun
      @soldat88hun 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Yep, I've tried it out and it's absolutely not suited to face modern planes.

    • @OneMoreDesu
      @OneMoreDesu 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      13.0 is a really shitty BR at the moment, but the F-15A has it worse

  • @a_catfish5180
    @a_catfish5180 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Pro tip for all viggens use thrust reversal (p is default I believe otherwise multifunction menu works) and hold the brakes using sim controls (you can bind them under sim controls but work in mouse sim even f you don’t use them I think B is default) that way you get both thrust reversing and brakes at the same time

  • @Banaananananananaman
    @Banaananananananaman 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    I don't think the plane should be 12.7 at all, but rather that everything else should go UP. 12.7 is already a nightmare because of the uptiers to 13.7 against fox 3 capable jets. Having amraams possible entering 11.7 territory sounds awful.

    • @TimsVariety
      @TimsVariety  16 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

      The BR cap really ought to be 15.0 with re-adjustment of at least a few dozen planes.

  • @Miratesus
    @Miratesus 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    We got no idea if the RWR is accurately modelled or not, Gaijin made a huge assumption as it's still classified.

  • @MultiSweeney1
    @MultiSweeney1 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The FliteTest Viggen remains arguably my favorite RC plane of all time, so I can't help but have a huge soft spot for the Swedish double dorito.

  • @XolarPoweredHistory21
    @XolarPoweredHistory21 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It’s RWR in real life id quite unique! It has a different sound for every airplane or ship or SAM system that looks at it!

  • @lasse4416
    @lasse4416 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Really enjoyed grinding the sweden TT with this on sim. Only major drawback for me was bad rwr making notching challenging.

  • @m1sz3lpl24
    @m1sz3lpl24 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    This thing is diabolical in sim, absolutely hate going against it

    • @RT42069
      @RT42069 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      My C.10's arch nemesis

  • @downwindfish1
    @downwindfish1 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    You can’t really move the JA37DI to 12.7 because then in a down tier the enemy team of entirely MIG-23ML’s will get nuked from orbit the nanosecond you can fire an AMRAAM at them. That’s why the only Fox-3 carrier below 13.0 is the F-14A, which still shouldn’t be facing 11.7’s imo
    If the BR’s were decompressed however, this thing could be competitive because it won’t fight 4.5 gen super fighters anymore but we also won’t have to subject 3rd gen missile busses to fighting AMRAAMs

  • @TKS-D
    @TKS-D 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nice, I'm currently suffering the modification grind of the JAS39A
    Also RB99s are AAMRAMs, I understand why you corrected it tho

  • @Moondoggymungmung
    @Moondoggymungmung 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Got it to swat su34s in ground rb and now after like nearly 600 kills to 200 deaths this plane honestly is a fantastic premium plane (I hate premiums so yeah...). Not worth the money for the premium version but the plane itself outside of irl monetary cost is really great for what you need it for. After flying the Eurofighter for like 700-800 kills made me miss the F-15 radar badly so when I started flying the Viggen at first I was super disgusted by the flight model but having a radar that works just means everything. I've been grinding Air RB to get to the Gripens finally and have had a pretty sweet time. Uptiers aren't as bad as people say it is. The average F15/EF/Rafale pilot has sub room temperature iq so killing 1-2 isn't a hard task. In downtiers, the Viggen is absolutely disgusting. The massive Kfir/premium influx at 13.0 and below has meant you often just butt blast these new players. In the future obviously won't be as easy farming them but I pretty much finished the entire Swedish air tree now just farming them the past week and a half. The near gripen level's of CM means you can just mindlessly leave them on when getting into furballs (which you shouldn't fly into but sometimes we can't resist).
    Despite all that, this plane is not for new players at all. The RWR alone makes it archaic and pure suffering when you have multiple fox 3 launches on you from different angles. The flight model makes dogwater look appetizing and no hmd like you said is a huge disadvantage for the simple reason that it's very difficult to fly high with the poor performance of the Viggen. When down low lurking like a rat, pitching up to get a lock often results in death.
    What really made me struggle was thinking it had no datalink to take advantage of the new mechanics we got last month cause of misinformation from another content creator. Now I can somewhat take advantage of angle gating and not losing aim-120s instantly to slight notches. I learned my lesson to just rely on you for information about aircraft haha.
    All in all for ground rb CAP this plane was a godsend for me. SPAA isn't enough for ground rb and everyone playing it should have a CAP capable aircraft and the Viggen does this role fantastically. Air RB I don't really like grinding with premiums as it gets stale but like the f-5c in it's heyday, I rather enjoyed grinding the last 4-5 million exp compared to the usual suffering. Getting 2 kills a match is relatively simple and getting more is more of a norm than an outlier simply cause you have a reliable radar and Aim-120s. The gun is easy to use too which is another huge plus. The SAP rounds just delete choppers and light AFVs.
    Love your vids Tim, always fun to listen to while spawn camping USA mains in top tier ground rb.

  • @TheRealCharter
    @TheRealCharter 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    As I haven't spent the time grinding out Sweden, I'm ever curious about what their tree holds. But in playing other nations this explains why I only see a handful for F21s in game. Sad story but hopefully a fixable one unless gaijin sees low sales and yeets it from sale for one reason or the other.

    • @TechSpidey111
      @TechSpidey111 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Really only worth playing for the Gripen or Viggens if you like them. Even for that, now that half the nations in game have a Gripen, there isn't that much point.
      On the other hand, the Gripen is great CAS for a Swedish ground lineup which I why I did the grind. Swedish top tier has arguably the best ground lineup in the game at the moment so it's absolutely worth playing for that.

  • @titan_fx
    @titan_fx 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Gaijin can't pay me $70 to play this thing

  • @janusz4156
    @janusz4156 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ideal fighter to Ace Combat 8.
    55 years of Viggen in 2022 and 30 years of Ace Combat series in 2025.

  • @csii6478
    @csii6478 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I don’t know why they didn’t model the gauges correctly because they are not in standard units also this plane suffers bad in ARB I have played the tech tree version some since I already had the whole tree done but where this plane really shines is in Simulator battles when you are at 13.0 top tier which happens every other rotation right now for 13.0. Was really a decent grinder for the winter event in Sim

  • @Sukhoi_Su-34
    @Sukhoi_Su-34 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nice work m8 keep it up

  • @tezbertzero1915
    @tezbertzero1915 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    AAAAAND the Pyörremyrsky still sits as the best Sweden tech tree premium up to this day (no, Draken premium is just for grinders that used to rocket base, it had to be free)
    At least there's a free copy paste in the TT.

  • @Tanks.With.Teeth.Malloy
    @Tanks.With.Teeth.Malloy 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I’m glad I did not buy this when it came out. Knew it was too good to be true. Ill wait for it to go on sale like I did for the Mig-21 bison. Wonderful review and frags as always Tim.

  • @JadsterNZ1
    @JadsterNZ1 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This would be hard for me to decide to use even if it was 12.0

  • @_Ladiesman217
    @_Ladiesman217 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Mannnnn THANK YOU

  • @Frost_x_NB
    @Frost_x_NB 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The BR is good the ceiling needs to increase.

  • @SourYogurt09
    @SourYogurt09 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Attack the d points!

  • @Ghawkes10
    @Ghawkes10 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Tim any plans on making a top tier guide for the newbies who get premiums?

    • @TimsVariety
      @TimsVariety  16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I generally just rely on my radar and weapon guides for that.

  • @diobrando2575
    @diobrando2575 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Honestly this plane is really nasty in a downtier. Sucks in an uptier but at least it's funny to imagine what's going through the head of a Eurofighter player when his Gen 4.5 jet gets dunked on by a Gen 3 Viggen.

  • @lasse4416
    @lasse4416 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hey Tim, whats your setup for VR? Also do you have any workaround for extreme shaking when zooming in? Its the main problem stopping me from playing wt on my quest 3.

  • @lorenmax2.013
    @lorenmax2.013 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If I played war thunder I'd name it "Mary" so that it'd be the Viggen Mary

    • @lorenmax2.013
      @lorenmax2.013 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      My puns have been becoming worse and worse, even for my standards

  • @T.o.p186
    @T.o.p186 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    if you make an video about the F4 version of this plane contract me, i can get unique photos of the real one

  • @Zosterias
    @Zosterias 18 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    How is this jet for Ground RB for anti-CAS duties?

    • @TimsVariety
      @TimsVariety  17 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      About the same as it is for regular air combat - if you're sneaky and get into position for RB-99 shots at people looking for ground targets, it can be reasonably effective.

  • @auzzyboy3421
    @auzzyboy3421 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    For the radar scope can you not cycle the MFDs?

  • @ashman8891
    @ashman8891 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How are you switching targets in TWS so quickly? Could you please tell me the keybind you're using for that? It works only inconsistently for me and I've resorted to turning my radar on and off and pointing my nose at where I think enemy planes are to lock up targets

    • @TimsVariety
      @TimsVariety  14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Cyclic radar targeting, I cover it with keybinds/details in my complete radar guide.
      th-cam.com/video/Weghk_2DpfA/w-d-xo.html

  • @kampfsau9997
    @kampfsau9997 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Like the F4F ICE to old of an airframe with to modern weapons, giving it a BR where it suffers in silence.

  • @Вольфрамище
    @Вольфрамище 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    im looking to buy that plane for my friend at sale, either that or J35XS (which i have, and like very much), but he is not sure about CM count on XS.
    so my question is. in your opinion which plane is better in today's meta?
    and second - is J-37DI better than F4F ICE ? (in your opinion)
    because for me i would say FM of J37 is more suited for top tier ambush tactics.
    but having ACM modes on ICE's radar was pretty usefull too.

    • @TimsVariety
      @TimsVariety  16 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      It really depends on playstyle. The 35XS will be better if your friend prefers up-close knife fights with IR missiles and guns, but the 37DI will be a better fit if they want to do active radar missile stuff. The low CM count on the 35XS _is_ an issue (I believe I mentioned it in my review), but its not a show stopper.
      In terms of the F4F ICE vs J37DI , IMHO they're both very comparable.

    • @Вольфрамище
      @Вольфрамище 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @TimsVariety thanks!

  • @jojosworlds1208
    @jojosworlds1208 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Has it even Datalink? I heard in another review that it doesn't support it.

    • @TimsVariety
      @TimsVariety  16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      As of making this video, it supports 4 datalink channels. You can see this on the statcard I show during the systems&weapons segment.

    • @jojosworlds1208
      @jojosworlds1208 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @TimsVariety OK, thanks. I didn't make sense to me that it has no datalink anyways.

  • @ragnarokinfall8565
    @ragnarokinfall8565 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    13.0 is like the 7.7 of air, most of planes at that BR shouldn't be there, like this ,the F4F, they could be fine, but facing planes that just outperform them in every aspect make them worse.

  • @sentinelxcix2526
    @sentinelxcix2526 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    well, at least it’s better than the Sea Harrier FA.2

  • @edgy_dabs9167
    @edgy_dabs9167 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Do the tornado F.3 late

    • @TimsVariety
      @TimsVariety  14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The GR.4 will be the next Tornado, and its coming soon.

    • @edgy_dabs9167
      @edgy_dabs9167 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @ it’s also a very sad aircraft to imo, with the typhoon being only slightly higher than better in basically every way its existence seems abit pointless currently

  • @ulfhedtyrsson
    @ulfhedtyrsson 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Bootychatter or not, she's a beaute.

  • @Hunting_Party
    @Hunting_Party 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How much do you have to screw up to lose to a viggen in a Mirage 2000 lol

  • @Fire...
    @Fire... 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This plane looks like it was made from paper and cardboard for me 😂

  • @samgaming2296
    @samgaming2296 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    the f4 ej and atw are also really bad

  • @spray916
    @spray916 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The viggen looses to the F-4E now in a dogfight. It's flight model is now among the worst in the game. You also get no DL channels with this radar. It's possibly on of the worst premiums in the game. A waste of money. Not much to grind in Sweden anyways. The future is Gripen E/F, Legacy Hornets, and F-35s.

  • @snowbrero5448
    @snowbrero5448 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    28 seconds ago is crazy why are there comments already lol

    • @chemputer
      @chemputer 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      TH-cam Memberships, notice how all the comments from 1-2 days ago have the little star next to their username that says "new member" or "member (4 months)"? Yeah, they get early access as a perk.
      I don't understand how someone asks this _every_ time someone releases a video with Patreon comments or TH-cam Members. People have been asking this question for over a decade now.
      I'm not trying to shit on you, you don't know, that's not your fault, now you know. I'm just kinda clueless how people in general still don't know, you know? It's weird.

    • @OneMoreDesu
      @OneMoreDesu 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@chemputer Bro was that really worth getting upset about?

  • @arnel4752
    @arnel4752 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Sooo.. No skill issue if you suck with this ::--D

  • @RageTH22
    @RageTH22 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The airspeed indicator?
    Don't you mean the fart indicator?

  • @carburo360
    @carburo360 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    it should be noted that people don't dog fight in this BR unless they are dumb. In this br is all about missiles and its missiles are pretty good. This plane does not struggle it fits into the meta just fine. A biplane with a good radar and fox 3 missiles would do well in this br oh wait the missiles have their own radar at 16 km so you don't even needs that. Is it a cash grab? yes. is it bad ? No. Sorry Tim you have lost all credibility after saying the f20 is amazing and and that this is bad. If you have cash and no time this plane is great; which is the whole point after all.

    • @TechSpidey111
      @TechSpidey111 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      So blatantly wrong lmao! Just because dogfights don't happen all the time (and they do happen once every match or 2 depending on how you play) doesn't meant flight performance isn't king. The jet itself is *okay* but the worst part is the matchmaker. I would not recommend any 13.0 planes at all right now, there's just no point when all you'll be fighting is 13.7.

    • @TimsVariety
      @TimsVariety  16 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      99% of the playerbase except for you are dumb then, as people get into dogfights at top tier all the time (its just not often 1 on 1, due to WT's game modes). As such, and catering to an audience of "the average player" I try to present how the plane will perform in a variety of circumstances. If you're content to skirt the edge of the battle, sometimes having zero engagements the entire match because you can't setup 1-on-1 BVR jousting with positioning 100% reliably, you're free to do so, but thats not how the vast majority of people play and it doesn't make them "dumb".

    • @mortexic4939
      @mortexic4939 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Massive L take. If you actually believe what you typed, than NOTHING about a plane matters for you except the number of fox3s it has, which is an incredibly low-iq hottake.

    • @_ace_defective_
      @_ace_defective_ 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      People don't dogfight a lot but flight performance *does* matter. Being able to accelerate quickly for more dangerous launches, being able to turn quickly to get into notches, not shitting away all your speed and becoming a sitting duck... and if you make it into late game situations, your dogfighting ability suddenly matters a lot more because it's more likely that you'll end up merging.
      So no - a biplane with good radar + missiles would not be good lmao, it would still be ass because its flight performance wouldn't let it do anything even with its missile kit. And flight performance does matter. Do you even know what you're doing?

    • @carburo360
      @carburo360 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @ So you are pandering giving bad information. The plane is much better than most other premiums. Its got 4 Guaranteed kills with 14.0 missiles. Need anyone say more. Btw yes getting your self into an unwinnable situation on purpose is the definition of dumb.