I've been trying to understand what this mystical "fixed point" is for MONTHS and your video achieved it before the 1 minute mark. (The Nix package manager uses this theory for example to override package definitions.)
I've been trying to understand this topic/ module for a long time now but no luck. You're truly god sent, A whole big blessing Thank you so much. I fully understand all because of you. Stay blessed!
I understand that if, by chance, we plugged in p into g(x) = x + f(x) and we get g(p) = p, then we have found a solution for f(x). What I don't understand is how we know that if we plug in an x - not necessarily p - then we know that to eventually converge to p, we use whatever g(x) = x + f(x) outputs as the new x.
Hi, for x(x-1) = 1 you say u start at xo =0 but i am not sure what are the next x0 you use, you say you get x2 = -1/2 but i have no clue why. It cannot be x0 = 1 so i am not sure what you use thanks.
I don't understand how teachers and textbooks manage to make these topics ununderstandable. Great explanation!
I've been trying to understand what this mystical "fixed point" is for MONTHS and your video achieved it before the 1 minute mark. (The Nix package manager uses this theory for example to override package definitions.)
I've been trying to understand this topic/ module for a long time now but no luck. You're truly god sent, A whole big blessing Thank you so much. I fully understand all because of you. Stay blessed!
thanks!!!!! finally someone who actually does an example not only talks notations
3:36 example (for those who don't have time)
Very helpful video, thanks so much!
Thank you..understood at the 11th hour of exam..
Glad to be of help
Thanks a lot for your explanation! Really helped me understand this topic! I am definitely going to check your other videos!
I like ur explanation, thank you so much
Great video , make me understand the concept as well!!
Glad to be of help
thanks a lot today is my maths paper
Good explanation, thanks
Thank you! It help me to understand my programming assignment question :)
Thank you so much that’s was very helpful ✨🌸
I understand that if, by chance, we plugged in p into g(x) = x + f(x) and we get g(p) = p, then we have found a solution for f(x).
What I don't understand is how we know that if we plug in an x - not necessarily p - then we know that to eventually converge to p, we use whatever g(x) = x + f(x) outputs as the new x.
Clearly Explained .... Very nice
Wddeu
Thank you 😊, it’s amazing 👍🏼🌸
Thanks! Just a quick refresher under quarantine
Better than my numerical analysis' lecturer's explanation lol
thank you so much! 🙏🏼
Great video, thank you.
Nice video keep it up
great job at explaining.
how did he get the values to substitute in those equations?
Just find the domain of the function that will not make the value of g(x) more than 1.
after the initial iteration, you substitute x for the value from the previous iteration
Great video. The way you write your x triggers me though
What if the initial approximation is not given ?
Hi, for x(x-1) = 1 you say u start at xo =0 but i am not sure what are the next x0 you use, you say you get x2 = -1/2 but i have no clue why. It cannot be x0 = 1 so i am not sure what you use thanks.
you get x_1 from subbing in x_0 into x_1 = 1/(x_0 - 1) = 1 / (0-1) = -1
Sir can u solve this question
f(x)=x-e^-x by fixed iteration method ?
9:01😊
great!
why x cannot be equal to zero ?
ay tor satya
Denominator gets zero sp
In that case there was only an x in the denominator so x=0 would mean division by zero
3:00
That's a sexy accent. Where are you from?
Not same method as my lecture teaches.
Initial guell