Why archaeologists avoid discussing this skull ?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
- In 2019, archaeologists have unearthed a 300,000-year-old skull in the Hualongdong cave of Anhui province, eastern China. This discovery has created waves in the scientific world and may revolutionalize the way we look at human evolution and their early ancestors.
The skull, known as HDL 6 (Hualongdong 6), was found along with 15 other specimens, including a nearly complete jawbone and leg bones. The remains belong to a young individual, estimated to be around 12 or 13 years old at the time of death.
Thanks For Watching 💖
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔔 Subscribe & Hit The Notification Bell 🔔
👍 Like This Video 👍
📥 Leave A Comment Down Below 📥
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER:
The video shows many hominins creatures from our past. These aren't real statues. They were made using computer programs (AI) based on what scientists think these ancient relatives looked like. We at "Hominin Horizons" created and own Most of these images.
If you own any of this video's content and don't want it to appear in our channel, please notify us via private message or email. The content will be REMOVED within 24 hours.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
The narrator claims that it is not denisovan. But we don’t have a denisovan skull, so it could be. Or like denisovan, it might be another “species” that has been hitherto unknown. It has gotten attention. We just do not have enough specimens to figure out how to classify it.
One reason it’s ignored is because it undermines China’s theory. God forbid you question them. Lol
One thing about migrations is that they probably occurred in waves and may or may not have followed consistent patterns. There's also nothing to say that very small groups left long, longgggg before larger groups began to leave more frequently, the first ones to leave may not have left any evidence at all.
Not leaving evidence is evidence in and of itself. Largish populations don’t just appear out of thin air and would indicate earlier, smaller populations, hence smaller migrations
How might environmental factors, such as climate change or resource depletion, influence the timing and patterns of these early migrations?
That's an Orc.
I think it's a young female denisovan skull.
it is not being avoided. there is simply nothing to ad to the discussion of it or anything more that has been found out about it yet. they are at a standstill, simple as that.
Hualongdong seems like an exclamation for a masculine presentation of an anatomical part. Sadly, this is not present in the fossil record. Probably why they are not discussing this.
Ooooh, they must be Annunaki Nephilim Giant Freemason skulls
Totally agree with you they all died out in a great flood that never happened because they never learnt how to swim.
Can DNA be extracted? That ends all discussion.
it´s far to old for it, I think...
You mean HLD 6. HuaLongDong
WS fantasy
The fact is many acheologists are very interested in this discovery and they certainly don't avoid the subject, at all .
But there's not really much to talk about at this time, only speculate
Don' t forget by the way that China Archeology is a part of chinese propaganda
The question is why do you need such this clickbait title for your video?😏
Kinda like evolution propaganda huh
@@markcredit6086 Indeed 😄
The hypocrisy of science has made me apathetic. Science of today is more interested in not hurting anyone's feelings rather than telling the world, the cold hard truth. It's boring to hear the same nonsense for 50 years.
bot
What we really need is a movement that hammers home the point that the authors of outdated theories and publications aren't failures and losers because they went off the best data available at the time. This is why we have the dogma, everyone is afraid to admit their publications and theories are wrong because they know they'll be viewed badly for it and have their reputations ruined. Really they shouldn't though. If it genuinely made sense when they first did it they should still be considered scholars and even better ones for retracting when and where necessary.
@@CoffeeFiend1 you answered a bot.
@@zerrierslizer1 Whether she's a bot or not the initial post was inviting a discussion on a particular topic. Something you don't seem particularly interested in, which is fine.
@@CoffeeFiend1 a bot inviting to a discussion? are you mental or something? talk to bots often do you?
Archaic is pronunced ar-KAY -ic, not arc-ic. Once again AI blunders where educated humans fear to go.
There are several words that have been mispronounced. It must, I suppose, be AI because of those mistakes, but I've never heard an AI voice with a Scottish accent before!
Scientist today for ideological reasons have placed all humans in the same racial box. What if each ethnic group we see today is descent of a different type of hominid? Humming birds, dolphins and wild cats are very similar among their species but they are different. We categorize two similar birds in different species but we never do the same with two modern humans.
It has a mix of later AND earlier traits? Well, that's the definition of a transitional fossil.
If one just Google HDL 6 Fossil one finds that the fossil is hardly being ignored by science. The consensus is that more fossils are needed for comparison, which is pretty much what is always said, and rightly so.
The problem is how 'specific' we are with human lineages. Humans are, and have always been, an extraordinarily morphologically varied class. IMHO, there are likely FEWER historical species of human than most believe, not more
He wandered away from the village and died , people went looking for him but couldn’t find him! 300000 years later we dug him up.
Hey that's my skull I lost it a long time ago, just kidding! What I think is two fold . #1 the Chinese scientist are very good but like any major discovery any where in the world they're subject to government interference for political or cultural reasons. #2 the idea that there is many more types of hominids yet to be discovered, many of these new finds are always subject to scrutiny and that is wise. Many of these questions can and will be answered in time when other technologies advance . Patients, after all people once thought that the earth was the center of the solar system and the sun circled it. Pure science with out cultural interference surly would be dreamy
I’m not surprised that not every fossil fits in a clear category.
Out of Africa theory getting less convincing all the time.
To me it looks like a Neanderthal skull.
God it's good to hear a Scots voice.
Big foot has been found!
Piltdown man!
ty 🙏🙏