AJ fought over two months ago and hasn’t done any interviews since, yet not a week goes by where Talksport doesn’t talk about him. Fury’s supposed to be fighting Usyk in less than a month, yet we keep hearing about Fury potentially fighting AJ, who’s coming off a loss. Say AJ is the face of British boxing, without saying he’s the face of British boxing.
Right....like AJ is busy with he's foundation and talksport literally every single week do a video about him. We have Usyk/Fury 2 coming up. U would think they would be talking about Usyk but nope. It's just goes to show who the biggest name is in the division. I am curious how things are gonna go once AJ retires
Forget those excuses for AJ, the guy is an experienced pro and knows what he needs to do in the hours before a fight. I think Ben Davison has some responsibility, for telling AJ to “roll the dice.” Dubois had burned a lot of energy up to that point, surely it would have been better for AJ to try to cover up, use the ring & weather the storm for a bit longer, to clear his head and wait for Dubois to slow down? Not saying it would’ve worked but it seemed like a better strategy to me.
@@t.f.1345 Anthony Joshua's dad Usyk battered him twice. Joshua got humiliated by Usyk and then had a meltdown. AJ accused Usyk of racism in February 2023🤣
wake up! they had to add the trinity later Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version.
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century. Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275: “It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: Matt 28,19 “The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church.
@@TheQuestionTheAnswerimagine being that upset about somebody saying something bad about blm aj you resort to the reverse psychology “sweetheart” comments 😂
Not an excuse because it's still his fault for not preparing properly, and not a shock because everyone was saying similar things not long after the fight.
Aj lost , he’s in the warrior business , we don’t want to hear about he had to get a taxi to the stadium or he had a scratch on his hand or any of that rubbish ! If you lose just say best man on the night and come back and do better ! I don’t remember hagler , Duran , hearns ever complaining about things that happens before the fight ?? 😂. Real warriors
Come on guys, AJ has been busy with he's clean hearts foundation and yall have been doing a video about him every week since😂. Can we talk about the 🤴 of the Heavyweight Division USYK more please
Here comes the excuses when it comes to Joshua as always. ALL UK MEDIA CAN DO IS TALK ABOUT JOSHUA ALL THE TIME? They always talked about the same topics. Uk media IS REALLY SORRY.
@@Anthony.Joshuas_lrish_Grandma not true - AJ has had plenty of criticism even here on talkSPORT including calls for his retirement. You’re confusing AJ with Fury who gets praised no matter what. Some of you are so delusional you think Fury lost because he was having so much fun in there. Lol whatever…
Does AJ deserve to walk into straight another world title shot? He's lost all of his last 3 fight's. He should fight Parker or someone to earn the right for another title shot surely.
Just move on. Joshua, Wilder and Fury have all been fun to watch but they're the most overrated heavyweights in heavyweight history. They all have fought 2/10 of their era and been knocked down around 25 times combined. They have never been goats or the best ever. It's alright for them to lose, so just let them all fight each other.
Yeah it's getting towards that time, I still wanna see more from AJ I don't think we've seen the best version of him. Fury I worry that we have seen the best version of and I don't think he can beat Usyk in the 2nd fight. Wilder should be done, although I would still love to the AJ v Wilder. I'm looking forward to the new crop coming through too, There's some serious potential coming from Britain in the Heavyweight department and I can't wait to see how the rest of the world tries matching up to the 🥊👌🏼
I don't want to see Del Boy continuing on much longer. He's been in some real wars and hopefully has made and banked enough to live a decent lifestyle. Every fight now seems like punishment he doesn't have to take. Hopefully he stays safe and manages to get out on his terms with his faculties intact.
i think being punched continuously in the face had a lot to do with why joshua face planted onto the canvas.... when joshua walked to the ring all we heard was how 'this is the best version of joshua ever' and now he got absolutely rinsed by Danile dubois all we get are shills making excuses. joshua got beat, lost every round, was on the floor 4 times. and ko'd in the 5th round - the better man won.
Let’s just get this right, AJ himself has never made one excuse. People are trying to make them for him so let’s not have a pop at AJ for other people being abit stupid
People still dont get it, and this is not about being an AJ fanboy (nothing like that in my books), but the unit that AJ is just can't be discounted. He's not the face of boxing for nothing!!! It was DDD's day on that night for sure, but that doesn't immediately discount AJ. Rematch will be a totally different game. Notice the slight moment when AJ connected, Dubois was like "Oh my God what was that?". AJ was unlucky when he went for the kill, and this can happen to the best of 'em as we saw in his case. But come the rematch, we all going to see the force of those two heavy handed fighters slug it out in a different way! As for Chisora's next fights, yes he'll have my attention if he takes the fight to Nnganou in Africa.. I'd like me another rumble in the jungle for sure, and after that he can test out Ruiz and Zhang. No need to fight wilder or Dillan... no point in those fights to me.
Doesn't matter what aj's excuses are, id be embarrassed to even use one, what matters is what happened, and what happened is ...that duboi exposed AJ for the hype job he essentially is
Aj didn’t get outclassed or anything like that it was just a big hard lucky punch could have easily gone the other way but good luck to the winner he should have taken the rematch dodging fights not a good plan fans will lose hope and interest in him
What was the excuse? Am I missing something? AJ took a nap before the fight? Eh lol that's normal not an excuse if it was an excuse it's right up there with wilder claiming his silly power rangers outfit was too heavy. And I'm a big wilder fan BTW. That lad needs to drop the silly immature ring outfits if he comes back. Do it old school, shorts a towel and James breland carrying a bucket.
Hold On! AJ has been two time Unified Heavyweight Champion of the World and Derek is saying that, he needs to be told to arrive at the venue earlier for his fight. Seriously? AJ got beaten by the better, hungrier Daniel Dubois.
wake up! they had to add the trinity later Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version.
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century. Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275: “It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: Matt 28,19 “The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church.
Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus. In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement. Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83) It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions. It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version. Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
Dubois beats aj 9 times out of 10... Sj can't take a punch amd Dubois isn't scared to throw his hands ... he sint gonna play the jab jab move type of fight. Dubois throws down.
wake up! they had to add the trinity later Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version.
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century. Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275: “It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: Matt 28,19 “The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church.
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes: “Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”. He explains further, that: “The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3]
Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus. In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement. Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83) It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions. It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version. Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
Ngannou vs Chisora better not be pay-per-view, because if it is, they sell maybe 5000, that has to be one of the worst fights that could ever be made, Chisora has been a warrior for a lot of years, but he thinks he is so much more popular than he actually is, he should just fight Dylan Whyte One more time, and then retire, people just aren’t interested in watching him anymore, he can go down as the guy that never back down from a challenge, but that’s about as good as it gets with him
Eddie Hearn annoys me.Keeps on about AJ and the biggest fight in boxing.AJ was exposed by DDD and AJ is running scared of the rematch because he would get smashed again.
These boxers insult the intelligence of most boxing fans their idea of entertainment is different than that of joe public who pay the bills in most instances (leave the oil money out of it). He Chisora is deluded he thinks people want to see him doing the same old washed up tactics round after round fight after fight gassed from about the 2nd round holding on, they don't its all baloney. And thinking that Tyson vs Paul is what the public want that's just a joke its no more than a freak show that's what boxing is becoming a circus act. In 20 years from now no one will talk about Chisora unless he's still in the ring fighting Pauls lad at 80.
AJ tried everything to get better. He done meditation in solitary, hypnosis and had 25 trainers who just couldn't polish a .......... But he made loads of money so job done
Chisora said he’d love to be London mayor after boxing - please do and get rid of khan who’s destroyed London. Good luck on next fight chisora would love a third fight with whyte
wake up! they had to add the trinity later Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version.
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century. Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275: “It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: Matt 28,19 “The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church.
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes: “Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”. He explains further, that: “The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3]
Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus. In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement. Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83) It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions. It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version. Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
What a pathetic excuse and disrespectful to DDD. So the only reason AJ lost / DDD won is because AJ had a long nap and got there late? Rubbish, he got out boxed, out punched and had no desire let alone the basics of keeping your hands up. DDD knocks him out quicker if it ever happens again.
Trust me, I would be richer than Richard Branson and Elon Musk put together if a penny represented each false and fabricated narrative that this channel creates about Anthony Joshua. Please stop, I beg.
Whyte v Chisira, hoth fights, was boxing at it's worst IMO - not much skill involved from bixers who do posess a little - a brutal slug fest, not for me, give me the unpopular pugilism of Mayweather v Pac Msn all day long!
It's apples and pears, though. Casuals love heavyweights as there's always a chance of big ko. Mayweather pacquio are much lighter, heavyweights aren't going to move like them. Usyk, fury, and aj are freaks of the sport for their speed and timing with their size. (This comment is not related, but has anyone else had their comments turned off by talksport? It will only let me reply to other comments? All because of comments I made about Spencer oliver and Gareth a Davis, the supposed professional "analysts" (who are paid, by the way), over their predictions for the fake paul v tyson fight, and Gareth comments on bellew and froch regarding fake paul.
@craigphillips9383 I hear you and agree that heavyweight boxing is a different animal. But your comment is irrelevant to what I was trying to explain, pugilism is pugilism regardless of weight. I also disagree that AJ is a freak heavyweught, excellent athlete and heavyweight specinan, but slightly above average boxing skill.. There are countless other examples of skilled heabyweights from previous eras also, Lewis being the most obvious from a Britush standpoint. I know most people like to see brutal fights/situations in life, I no longer do. I no longer enjoy fighting, thank God, but I do enjoy watching good fights (if you can work thst one out mate) ☺️
Aj has the potential to beat any he gets in with think nerves and worrying how much money he’s getting is his problem needs to fight for pride not just the bank account hope he comes back stronger
AJ fought over two months ago and hasn’t done any interviews since, yet not a week goes by where Talksport doesn’t talk about him. Fury’s supposed to be fighting Usyk in less than a month, yet we keep hearing about Fury potentially fighting AJ, who’s coming off a loss. Say AJ is the face of British boxing, without saying he’s the face of British boxing.
Right....like AJ is busy with he's foundation and talksport literally every single week do a video about him. We have Usyk/Fury 2 coming up. U would think they would be talking about Usyk but nope. It's just goes to show who the biggest name is in the division. I am curious how things are gonna go once AJ retires
Fkn LOL
@ 🗣️💯 Facts!
Don't talk wet.
If by “face of British boxing” you mean face down on the canvas then… yeah… you are right!
The excuses for AJ are hilarious 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Not really, it's all about timing 😌👌
It's like it was his first fight u can't blame others for your disorganisation
Derek "you understand" chisora
bruh...
Derek don’t understand though
Forget those excuses for AJ, the guy is an experienced pro and knows what he needs to do in the hours before a fight. I think Ben Davison has some responsibility, for telling AJ to “roll the dice.” Dubois had burned a lot of energy up to that point, surely it would have been better for AJ to try to cover up, use the ring & weather the storm for a bit longer, to clear his head and wait for Dubois to slow down? Not saying it would’ve worked but it seemed like a better strategy to me.
Lithen, AJ passed the torch to DDD. Everybody made fun of DDD but he proved us wrong. I'm so happy for him
Facts we are now entering the Dubois era. Cause think about it...Usyk, Fury AJ & Wilder will all be retiring nxt yr or 2026.
Anthony Joshua tried to act like a gangster with Dubois before the fight then got knocked down 5 times and sparked out cold 😅
@IronMike_Ththon ....... Getting Mike's lisp in there wherever you can. Blinder 😂😂😂
Dubois got humiliated by his dad usyk 🤣
@@t.f.1345 Anthony Joshua's dad Usyk battered him twice. Joshua got humiliated by Usyk and then had a meltdown. AJ accused Usyk of racism in February 2023🤣
AJ rimmer Chisora said,"AJ under Ben Davison would KO Fury in 4 and Usyk in 5 rounds". 😂
Jeez, Chisora has taken too many blows to the head.
Arnold Judas Rimmer 😂
In the 70s the top heavyweights fought each other win lose or draw. Ali Norton Frazier Foreman Shavers amongst others all fought
Frazier never fought Shavers , Lyle or Norton all three big punchers of that era .
@@UncleTermite Yeah exactly and Foreman never fought Shavers, Norton and Frazier never fought etc etc Ali however did fight everyone.
Chisora vs Sadiq Khan would make me so happy! Vote Chisora
Thts piss take
Chisora for Reform UK
wake up! they had to add the trinity later
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version.
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century.
Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command
The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:
“It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: Matt 28,19
“The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church.
Aj took him lightly and never focus
I agree, just like Andy ruiz
Derek has taken toooo many punches if he thinks AJ Has still got something he never had in the first place
Proper pilchard you are mate. The kind of a person even your parents regret having
Chisora is a Joshua bootlicker. He said that AJ would KO Fury in 4 and Usyk in 5 rounds 😅
@@Anthony.Joshuas_lrish_Grandma Hello gorgeous, how are you? I knew it wouldn't be long before you came to talk some nonsense.
@@TheQuestionTheAnswerimagine being that upset about somebody saying something bad about blm aj you resort to the reverse psychology “sweetheart” comments 😂
No one cares what derek thinks
Not an excuse because it's still his fault for not preparing properly, and not a shock because everyone was saying similar things not long after the fight.
It’s not about entertainment it’s about sport!
🤔... sports is entertainment!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's none of it. Its about money. Always
It's called Sports Entertainment
@@CR7hg what do you reckon? they should do it for free?? be my guest if you want to take punches to ya face for free...
AJ doesn't deserve to fight DDD, Fury or Usyk!!! He needs to get back in the que, just like everyone else!
I agree 👍
Money talks
How is he close , no one will buy the fight
Aj lost , he’s in the warrior business , we don’t want to hear about he had to get a taxi to the stadium or he had a scratch on his hand or any of that rubbish ! If you lose just say best man on the night and come back and do better ! I don’t remember hagler , Duran , hearns ever complaining about things that happens before the fight ?? 😂. Real warriors
Own African people WTF 😳 been where in union jacks all his fights
Thanks for posting.
Joshua's nap before the fight must not have been long enough cos he went for another one in the ring
Dumbest comment I've read in a long time.
@HisExcellencyB NOW THE BIGGEST BURNER ACCOUNT ON TH-cam.
Since when did AJ go to sleep in his career? Never been put unconscious 😂
😂😂
Come on guys, AJ has been busy with he's clean hearts foundation and yall have been doing a video about him every week since😂. Can we talk about the 🤴 of the Heavyweight Division USYK more please
It makes perfect sense for AJ to fight Wilder.
Love Del Boy but hes slurring his words more and more. Hope he dont take much more punishment
Aj got to stadium 45 mins before fight time.. WTF!!
It's all about timing ⏲️
Here comes the excuses when it comes to Joshua as always.
ALL UK MEDIA CAN DO IS TALK ABOUT JOSHUA ALL THE TIME? They always talked about the same topics. Uk media IS REALLY SORRY.
Anthony Joshua controls the British boxing media through his PR team and 258 Management. Most of the journalists and pundits avoid criticising him
@@Anthony.Joshuas_lrish_Grandma not true - AJ has had plenty of criticism even here on talkSPORT including calls for his retirement.
You’re confusing AJ with Fury who gets praised no matter what. Some of you are so delusional you think Fury lost because he was having so much fun in there. Lol whatever…
CHI CHI CHISORA IS A LEGEND OF BRITISH BOXING 🥊
Haye
Usyk
Fury x3
Whyte x2
Pulev x2
Parker x2
Joyce
Takam
ANYONE AND EVERYONE
MAXIMUM RESPECT TO DEL
Does AJ deserve to walk into straight another world title shot? He's lost all of his last 3 fight's. He should fight Parker or someone to earn the right for another title shot surely.
Tut Tut🤦
everyone makes excuses for Aj he gets beat all the time even when he fights bums it's tight
Dubois wins again if it happens.
Someone else deserves a chance to fight the winner of Usyk Fury. AJ should settle the score with miller
Just move on. Joshua, Wilder and Fury have all been fun to watch but they're the most overrated heavyweights in heavyweight history. They all have fought 2/10 of their era and been knocked down around 25 times combined. They have never been goats or the best ever. It's alright for them to lose, so just let them all fight each other.
Yeah it's getting towards that time, I still wanna see more from AJ I don't think we've seen the best version of him. Fury I worry that we have seen the best version of and I don't think he can beat Usyk in the 2nd fight. Wilder should be done, although I would still love to the AJ v Wilder.
I'm looking forward to the new crop coming through too, There's some serious potential coming from Britain in the Heavyweight department and I can't wait to see how the rest of the world tries matching up to the 🥊👌🏼
@@mattkiddie7939aj7.0 will ko usyk in 3 rounds 🙈 not really though 😂
@@Fathervinyard What are you on about?
@@mattkiddie7939 ajs had more comebacks than the spice girls hes done
@@Fathervinyard I still think there are fights for him. Not for any belts but he's still a big draw.
How many times does AJ have to prove he's a mid level boxer before people accept he's a mid level boxer?
Chisora has such a silky smooth voice.
Glad Ade was honest about AJ v Dubois pt2
I can't understand this human punching bag still relevant in boxing. Make it make sense.
Derek daniels biggest words were “YOU DONT INTIMIDATE ME” and he sure meant it
I don't want to see Del Boy continuing on much longer. He's been in some real wars and hopefully has made and banked enough to live a decent lifestyle. Every fight now seems like punishment he doesn't have to take. Hopefully he stays safe and manages to get out on his terms with his faculties intact.
Nice chemistry guys
Derick vs Lois Ortiz or Andy Ruiz would be live
i think being punched continuously in the face had a lot to do with why joshua face planted onto the canvas....
when joshua walked to the ring all we heard was how 'this is the best version of joshua ever' and now he got absolutely rinsed by Danile dubois all we get are shills making excuses.
joshua got beat, lost every round, was on the floor 4 times. and ko'd in the 5th round - the better man won.
Derek had to many punches to the head if he believes this BS he's comin out with about Joshua! 😂😂😂 That big stiff ain't goin near Dubois again 💯
Bent's dislike for AJ is always hilarious....It is ok
The Last dance,They say that every time Del-boy fights 🤣🤣🤣
Let’s just get this right, AJ himself has never made one excuse. People are trying to make them for him so let’s not have a pop at AJ for other people being abit stupid
People still dont get it, and this is not about being an AJ fanboy (nothing like that in my books), but the unit that AJ is just can't be discounted. He's not the face of boxing for nothing!!! It was DDD's day on that night for sure, but that doesn't immediately discount AJ. Rematch will be a totally different game. Notice the slight moment when AJ connected, Dubois was like "Oh my God what was that?". AJ was unlucky when he went for the kill, and this can happen to the best of 'em as we saw in his case. But come the rematch, we all going to see the force of those two heavy handed fighters slug it out in a different way!
As for Chisora's next fights, yes he'll have my attention if he takes the fight to Nnganou in Africa.. I'd like me another rumble in the jungle for sure, and after that he can test out Ruiz and Zhang. No need to fight wilder or Dillan... no point in those fights to me.
We will all miss delboy when hes gone
Respect war chisora while you can
Dericks really showing signs of CTE , he has suffered brain damage threw out all these fights
Doesn't matter what aj's excuses are, id be embarrassed to even use one, what matters is what happened, and what happened is ...that duboi exposed AJ for the hype job he essentially is
Aj didn’t get outclassed or anything like that it was just a big hard lucky punch could have easily gone the other way but good luck to the winner he should have taken the rematch dodging fights not a good plan fans will lose hope and interest in him
Yes he did, he was beaten in every department
Jab
Aggression
Movement
Punch selection
Desire
Everything he was outclassed totally for the whole fight
What was the excuse? Am I missing something?
AJ took a nap before the fight? Eh lol that's normal not an excuse if it was an excuse it's right up there with wilder claiming his silly power rangers outfit was too heavy.
And I'm a big wilder fan BTW. That lad needs to drop the silly immature ring outfits if he comes back.
Do it old school, shorts a towel and James breland carrying a bucket.
Hold On! AJ has been two time Unified Heavyweight Champion of the World and Derek is saying that, he needs to be told to arrive at the venue earlier for his fight. Seriously? AJ got beaten by the better, hungrier Daniel Dubois.
BE A BEAUTIFUL LONDON WITH DEL AS MAYOR 💯 🎉
london is gone
wake up! they had to add the trinity later
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version.
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century.
Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command
The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:
“It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: Matt 28,19
“The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church.
Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus.
In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement.
Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83)
It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions.
It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version.
Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
According to chisora… AJ has had 40 winks, and a good chat, so he’ll beat Dubois next time around.
Dubois beats aj 9 times out of 10... Sj can't take a punch amd Dubois isn't scared to throw his hands ... he sint gonna play the jab jab move type of fight. Dubois throws down.
Derek bout to ask "Where's Wallin"?
Derrick they all missed something special you had my vote long time ago
Delboy for Mayor 100%
Chisora fought everybody but beaten by everybody
Wasnt ready aka bottled it
Chisora chats some shite
Del Boy would beat AJ if they wasn’t friends
5:50 Derek speaking sense again. REFORM
wake up! they had to add the trinity later
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version.
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century.
Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command
The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:
“It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: Matt 28,19
“The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church.
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes:
“Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”.
He explains further, that:
“The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3]
Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus.
In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement.
Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83)
It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions.
It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version.
Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
Derick just making excuses for his friend AJ!
True, Chisora said that the new AJ would KO Fury in 4 and Usyk in 5 rounds. Joshua got humiliated and sparked out cold in the 5th😅
Ngannou vs Chisora better not be pay-per-view, because if it is, they sell maybe 5000, that has to be one of the worst fights that could ever be made, Chisora has been a warrior for a lot of years, but he thinks he is so much more popular than he actually is, he should just fight Dylan Whyte One more time, and then retire, people just aren’t interested in watching him anymore, he can go down as the guy that never back down from a challenge, but that’s about as good as it gets with him
Dereck “ do you understand “ Chisora
Eddie Hearn annoys me.Keeps on about AJ and the biggest fight in boxing.AJ was exposed by DDD and AJ is running scared of the rematch because he would get smashed again.
AJ was lookjng for an out in the fight before it even started hence his poor pre-fight prep.
Albert Hall great
These boxers insult the intelligence of most boxing fans their idea of entertainment is different than that of joe public who pay the bills in most instances (leave the oil money out of it). He Chisora is deluded he thinks people want to see him doing the same old washed up tactics round after round fight after fight gassed from about the 2nd round holding on, they don't its all baloney. And thinking that Tyson vs Paul is what the public want that's just a joke its no more than a freak show that's what boxing is becoming a circus act. In 20 years from now no one will talk about Chisora unless he's still in the ring fighting Pauls lad at 80.
AJ tried everything to get better. He done meditation in solitary, hypnosis and had 25 trainers who just couldn't polish a ..........
But he made loads of money so job done
I think Ben brain washed AJ . AJ went in thinking he was going to do a Francis on Dubois.
del boy doesnt sound right in this, almost like he has a lisp. hes gave a lot to the sport.
Whats the point in these guys fighting? There is alwsys an excuse when they lose...even when they get battered
Femi the most overrated heavyweight in history 😂
Calm down there mate 😂
Femi who's tht
Perhaps, but Luke Partridge is running a close race with all the pull outs, cherry picking and recycling
Femi the Black British King 👑👑
@@ManicMarxmanFury is the best British heavyweight since Lennox Lewis. Anthony Joshua is the biggest hypejob and quitter 😅
I am bored by AJ always in the limelight when he is not that good. He needs to fight Bakole or Zhang. Thats where he is now.
What he said just shpws that he didnt take the man serious and thats why the putcome is what it was
Oscar de la hoya iz the best boxer I ever seen till date
Chisora said he’d love to be London mayor after boxing - please do and get rid of khan who’s destroyed London. Good luck on next fight chisora would love a third fight with whyte
wake up! they had to add the trinity later
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version.
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century.
Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command
The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:
“It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: Matt 28,19
“The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church.
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes:
“Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”.
He explains further, that:
“The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3]
Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus.
In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement.
Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83)
It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions.
It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version.
Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
It's not AJs first big fight. Excuses sound lame.
I’m sorry but AJ got absolutely battered we don’t forget
The excuses are not coming from AJ's mouth so who cares!
@@michealdexter1188 yes indeed. Your comment is probably the most overlooked one on this thread.
Son of hard working migrant parents “big up Farage and Reform”. Dozy
No chin AJ. Thats all she wrote....
What’s wrong with derek he’s talking strange or has he always been like that
What a pathetic excuse and disrespectful to DDD. So the only reason AJ lost / DDD won is because AJ had a long nap and got there late? Rubbish, he got out boxed, out punched and had no desire let alone the basics of keeping your hands up. DDD knocks him out quicker if it ever happens again.
Joshua is finished doesn't deserve tyson fury or usyk but usyk is gonna knock fury out in the rematch
AJ finished unfortunately
Our African people, yet claims to be British? Make your mind up son.
He’s British but he’s also acknowledging his African ethnicity. Nothing wrong with what he says imo.
🇿🇦🇩🇰
A bit like when the Irish and Italian Americans embrace their heritage. Do you understand the difference?
I hope Derek Retires, He's slurring his speech more now than before !!
Chisora loves his boy AJ.. has his built in excuses at the ready embarrassing
he just mumbles nonsense
Deethroat the who ? Chisora slurrin
Terrible excuses ''he got to the stadium to late and had a nap in the day time'' almost as bad as wilders heavy costume excuse.
Chisors would probably beat aj lol
What a load of old rubbish.
Black tie and five guys
Trust me, I would be richer than Richard Branson and Elon Musk put together if a penny represented each false and fabricated narrative that this channel creates about Anthony Joshua.
Please stop, I beg.
Chisora is like a dinosaur been around for years
excuses for AJ ... they guy is done , weak chin stamina gone , in his own words he is sh!t...
Difference is aj never made any excuses.
Derek chisora what he's age
Whyte v Chisira, hoth fights, was boxing at it's worst IMO - not much skill involved from bixers who do posess a little - a brutal slug fest, not for me, give me the unpopular pugilism of Mayweather v Pac Msn all day long!
It's apples and pears, though. Casuals love heavyweights as there's always a chance of big ko. Mayweather pacquio are much lighter, heavyweights aren't going to move like them. Usyk, fury, and aj are freaks of the sport for their speed and timing with their size.
(This comment is not related, but has anyone else had their comments turned off by talksport? It will only let me reply to other comments? All because of comments I made about Spencer oliver and Gareth a Davis, the supposed professional "analysts" (who are paid, by the way), over their predictions for the fake paul v tyson fight, and Gareth comments on bellew and froch regarding fake paul.
@craigphillips9383 I hear you and agree that heavyweight boxing is a different animal. But your comment is irrelevant to what I was trying to explain, pugilism is pugilism regardless of weight. I also disagree that AJ is a freak heavyweught, excellent athlete and heavyweight specinan, but slightly above average boxing skill.. There are countless other examples of skilled heabyweights from previous eras also, Lewis being the most obvious from a Britush standpoint. I know most people like to see brutal fights/situations in life, I no longer do. I no longer enjoy fighting, thank God, but I do enjoy watching good fights (if you can work thst one out mate) ☺️
Aj has the potential to beat any he gets in with think nerves and worrying how much money he’s getting is his problem needs to fight for pride not just the bank account hope he comes back stronger
Just retire chisora 🤷
These three are sharp and funny.