I have always wondered how in the world they did this intro.. what you did totally makes sense. Thank you very much. BTW very few drummers can play this intro in time with the guitar since there is no count . I'm not a drummer but i have had to teach every drummer i've played with how to come in on time.
Hey Rusty, very interesting how you figured this out. Also enjoyed the real to real. It's been many years since I recorded with one and the forward and backward sounds came back like it was yesterday. those machines were fun to play with and the sound was much better than any digital. Do you find the analog as still better today than digital?
@ejnmusic I have looked into comparisons of digital and analog. Spent many hours on You Tube looking at whether digital fails to deliver an accurate analog output. Simply put, I believe that with todays converters, when recording digital, a sample rate of 24k and a bit depth of 24bits will have enough resolution to accurately playback up to 24kHz. Since this is beyond the range of human hearing the listener will hear an accurate reproduction of the original analog input to the digital recording system. While aliasing at lower frequencies can occur in the audible range when using certain DSP processors, enabling oversampling in those DSP processors can usually filter out the aliasing, thus eliminating it. So fo me, I think digital has taken analog's place in the world of recording for justifiable reasons. Cheers. Rusty
![Shareปลาวาฬ ส่งท้าย SS1 พาเปียโน ขึ้น Ferrari ก่อนไปขาย แลก Nissan l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KAknGkTNIvg/mqdefault.jpg)
I have always wondered how in the world they did this intro.. what you did totally makes sense. Thank you very much. BTW very few drummers can play this intro in time with the guitar since there is no count . I'm not a drummer but i have had to teach every drummer i've played with how to come in on time.
I am sure there will be comments that think I am wrong but glad the first comment was one that agreed with my porposition. Cheers, Rusty
Hey Rusty, very interesting how you figured this out. Also enjoyed the real to real. It's been many years since I recorded with one and the forward and backward sounds came back like it was yesterday. those machines were fun to play with and the sound was much better than any digital. Do you find the analog as still better today than digital?
@ejnmusic I have looked into comparisons of digital and analog. Spent many hours on You Tube looking at whether digital fails to deliver an accurate analog output. Simply put, I believe that with todays converters, when recording digital, a sample rate of 24k and a bit depth of 24bits will have enough resolution to accurately playback up to 24kHz. Since this is beyond the range of human hearing the listener will hear an accurate reproduction of the original analog input to the digital recording system. While aliasing at lower frequencies can occur in the audible range when using certain DSP processors, enabling oversampling in those DSP processors can usually filter out the aliasing, thus eliminating it. So fo me, I think digital has taken analog's place in the world of recording for justifiable reasons. Cheers. Rusty