Bret Hart being #1 is the right call. Not only was his title reigns (for the most part) memorable, he became a Triple Crown champion at a time when there only was the three championships to win.
Yeah. For me, Bret Hart will always be the definitive Triple Crown champ because (aside from being one of greatest of all time) he did it in the "right" order. (1) Debut as part of a legendary tag team with a unified gimmick, (2) have a successful solo run with the IC belt, and (3) ascend to Top Guy with a world title win. Shawn Michaels kinda did it the same way (even though the Rockers tag championship win isn't recognized) , but I'll always see him as someone who came after Bret. Most of the people on this list (even Kofi and Big E) first made their name as solo performers, with tag success coming after an IC or world title win. And when you make a tag team out of two solo successes (no matter how great the tag team ends up being: New Day, Team Hell No, Money Inc., etc.) it's always going to feel a little wrong to me.
The Hart Dungeon is well represented on this list. Growing up I did not understand why I liked Bret and Owen (Blue Blazer) matches so much more than other matches. Bret was not as flashy as the top guys and Blue Blazer constantly lost but even when I was little-little (3-4 years old) I remember saying "his matches are just so fun".
I don’t understand why the smackdown/WWE tag titles don’t count. I get the US title since its lineage didn’t start in WWE but the tag belts did. That doesn’t make much sense.
Triple crown and grand slam stuff just doesn’t make sense. The triple crown should be 1 world title reign, 1 mid card reign, 1 tag reign. I think the grand slam should be retcon to 2 different world title rings and two different mid card reigns. What wwe views as counting for them is just strange
Dean Ambrose is a 3X International champion! His first reign was 64 days His second was a RESPECTABLE 152 DAYS! His third was 29 days! Why are you misinforming the audience just to place Mox in a lower position? Seriously either edit this or apologize
I would assume so but I think they might wait until recognition of the concept to confirm. I honestly don’t want this to happen but it would quickly put this in perspective if Bayley wins her matches over the next two days.
Pretty ridiculous to count the old World Heavyweight Championship but not the current one or even universal titles. They’re world titles too. WWE is basically saying they’re not. But why count the old HWC then?
For the record Eddie Guerrero was not a two time WWE tag team champion he was a four time WWE tag team champion. Twice with Chavo, once with Tajiri and once with Mysterio
@@Rashiddo I really must insist on seeing them do the arithmetic on this one, because if you average out the quality of the different tiers, 1. IC came first, pretty shortly after his debut and held together with Euro. Even the manner of dropping them protected him, because he wasn't pinned or submitted for either 2. World title. His first being in his maiden year, beating *the Motherfucking Rock* at the apex of his popularity and retaining it in a fuckin six man HIAC. 3. Tag. Debuted a whole new tag championship in the early days of the draft with Benoit, with whom he had amazing chemistry. Banger. Banger. Banger
it should be like how i do it in efed. a world division, mid card, special rules, tag, and now trios. When you win 3 belts (1 from each group) you are triple crown and if you get them all across you are known as Grand Slam champion
Bret Hart probably the greatest of all time. Hes been in the top 3 of any list cultaholic does. And rightfully so, i truly believe that Bret "Hitman" Hart is the greatest professional wrestler of all time.
It’s not really that crazy. Miz had some great tag and IC reigns. Ambrose didn’t do much with any of the belts, and Roman and Seth have had better times with other belts.
@@Justin_North I mean, if it was ranking every IC champion then yeah, but there are so many clangers in this list. Angle at the bottom? Come the fuck on. How much time was there from his debut to being a double champion? And then beating the Rock for the big one pretty much as soon as he dropped?
This is probably the worst list y’ave done so far. When I saw Booker T and Kurt Angle dead last and Ronda Rousey so high up, I knew this list would be bad.
I wonder if Pedro Morales had to defend his title against the '70s equivalents of Kane and the Big Show. You know: the guys they put up against champions they crowned "for the fans" instead of "for the McMahon."
So if the US title doesn't count, why does the World heavyweight? Plus with the women's ic/us titles being added, the triple crown for them will be restarted
Imagine this Orton wins the title and loses it a screwy way and then he wins it back now he’s at 16 Orton drops the title then later vacate the title cena vs Orton for the record
I mean, *technically*, Kevin Nash (maybe) did hold the WCW Television title. Scott Hall was a double champ (US and TV), he gave Nash the TV title, and Nash threw it in the trash all of 30 seconds later. But that should still count, dammit!
I'm not gonna rag on Cultaholic as seems to be the norm around here, but what I will say is... Big E??? CultaBOLLOCKS! Appreciate the effort aside from that though
for some reason i thought Liv Morgan was a triple crown champ then i realized it was the the same belt twice but the first one was with that M&M colored belt
Well there’s a women’s IC title now and there’s rumored to be a women’s US title so maybe it’ll be a bit easier for the women to get it instead of having to be the world champ in both brands
I remember as a child hearing about how Bret and Pedro had the Triple Crown....now it seems more normalized with 40+ But when Shawn won the GRANDSLAM It blew my little 6 year old mind You mean there another level above the "Triple crown"
Mania 25 is just too inconsistent and no near as good as the 8 Manias before it. I still have fond memories of it but sadly It’s still a one match show. HBK/Taker is literally the only match worth revisiting. There’s some gems like Jeff and Matt Hardy’s match but everything else is either forgettable or trash. 🗑️
Aj might be a 5x TNA triple crown holder, but Kurt Angle did it all at once
Ronda being above Bianca and Rhea doesn't sit right with me lmao.
Ronda being as high as she was is crazy
@@Clyde-S-Wilcoxasuka will always be above alexa
@@BossRoss13in the ring yes, in terms of WWE perception no
@@inuenndo_ in terms of perspective too
Asuka is better than Alexa and Ronda combined
For some reason my brain merged JBL & Christian into Jack Swagger when I saw the thumbnail
Same bro 😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Thats how u know you've had to much wrestling😂😂😂
JBL & Christian had a baby and it turned out to be Jack Swagger, that would be an interesting reality show.
Me too 😂
Dude this list is ALL OVER THE PLACE! I have no comprehension how you guys determined the order of things here lol
How many times of each belt how many days as champ and how significant the title reigns were.
That may be so, but he nailed #1 perfectly.
Bret Hart being #1 is the right call. Not only was his title reigns (for the most part) memorable, he became a Triple Crown champion at a time when there only was the three championships to win.
Pretty much the only right call in there tbh
Yeah. For me, Bret Hart will always be the definitive Triple Crown champ because (aside from being one of greatest of all time) he did it in the "right" order. (1) Debut as part of a legendary tag team with a unified gimmick, (2) have a successful solo run with the IC belt, and (3) ascend to Top Guy with a world title win. Shawn Michaels kinda did it the same way (even though the Rockers tag championship win isn't recognized) , but I'll always see him as someone who came after Bret.
Most of the people on this list (even Kofi and Big E) first made their name as solo performers, with tag success coming after an IC or world title win. And when you make a tag team out of two solo successes (no matter how great the tag team ends up being: New Day, Team Hell No, Money Inc., etc.) it's always going to feel a little wrong to me.
Time to wait for the ranking of all Grand Slam champions! Let's see how much the US title and Smackdown belts change things up!
The Hart Dungeon is well represented on this list.
Growing up I did not understand why I liked Bret and Owen (Blue Blazer) matches so much more than other matches. Bret was not as flashy as the top guys and Blue Blazer constantly lost but even when I was little-little (3-4 years old) I remember saying "his matches are just so fun".
It's like they were fun to watch WRESTLE instead of pose and flex😁
Omos can walk. He's certainly not Giant Gonzales or Great Khali.
He's done less in wrestling than them and Zeus
@@Kingofb0ngstyle He won a title. Most big men never do. Plus he managed to get screen time. Where has Strowman been lately ?
@@raoulk35 injured if I remember correctly
I don’t understand why the smackdown/WWE tag titles don’t count. I get the US title since its lineage didn’t start in WWE but the tag belts did. That doesn’t make much sense.
Triple crown and grand slam stuff just doesn’t make sense. The triple crown should be 1 world title reign, 1 mid card reign, 1 tag reign. I think the grand slam should be retcon to 2 different world title rings and two different mid card reigns. What wwe views as counting for them is just strange
They do count. Or should. Angie completed the triple crown when he and Benoit won the Smackdown tag team titles.
I remember Kane as Triple Crown Champion because he became the Grand Slam champion on the same night.
Christian did as well.
The greatest Triple Crown winner in WWE history indeed. One might even say the best there is, the best there was, and the best there ever will be.
Being on this list is like being in the first Elimination Chamber. All legends with a monumental achievement, but SOMEONE'S gotta be Booker T.
You mean RVD. Booker was a way bigger star in 2002 than RVD.
^Nope, booker was last on the list that’s what their comment was referencing. Not “star power”
This list's #01 couldn't be any other than The Best There Is, the Best There Was, the Best There Ever Will Be.
Technically Austin wasn't Tag Champion with Mankind. It was Dude Love
Try to do a video on the wrestlers that only hold world championships
Is Chris Benoit technically a triple crown winner?
Ye he is
It’s also a Grand Slam champion since the Us title counts
Come on guys no mention of Benoit
@@DavidPunk223 I only ask because with the criteria it places him as a triple crown. Nothing wrong with asking .
@@DavidPunk223why??
Angle's & Benoit's Tag Title reign lasted only 16 days, not 35.
AJ IC run is underrated.
finally some respect on Y2J
Dean Ambrose is a 3X International champion!
His first reign was 64 days
His second was a RESPECTABLE 152 DAYS!
His third was 29 days!
Why are you misinforming the audience just to place Mox in a lower position? Seriously either edit this or apologize
damn, bro took it personally 😂
I do not understand this list at all, is combined days most important, quality of reigns? Most titles? Is a world title more weighted? I'm lost
Just full of bias no way Roman that low or aj styles that’s bs Pedro mid frfr
Hbk being the only one with 300+ days with all three belts makes it pretty clear cut to me
Yeah I have no idea how these rankings were determined. The list seems really out of place with no clear reasoning.
Wow imagine putting Booker and JBL at the bottom. Clearly have something against commentary
Having Sasha over Charolette and Becky just feels so wrong. And I peeped that shot a Charolette winning the tag title
Are we gonna change what makes a women's triple crown? Since there are now women's midcard titles?
I would assume so but I think they might wait until recognition of the concept to confirm. I honestly don’t want this to happen but it would quickly put this in perspective if Bayley wins her matches over the next two days.
Daniel Bryan was tag champion with Erick Rowan too. Good research guys.
We need more of the Years In Professional Wrestling Timeline and WCW PPVs Ranked By Year videos thanks
No Randal Keith song. 0/10
TRUE
I could go my entire life not seeing rousey or baesler's faces ever again.
Rousey should be at the bottom of the list by principle.
Bro they are so biased that they even lied about Dean Ambrose whonhad 3 IC title reigns, one of which lasting 152 days!
Pretty ridiculous to count the old World Heavyweight Championship but not the current one or even universal titles. They’re world titles too. WWE is basically saying they’re not. But why count the old HWC then?
Because WWE has not said if either of those belts count
Edge should rank higher than Orton
Cena really needs to win the IC belt before his retirement and also a 17 time world champ.
Didn't know WWE didn't count the Universal or Smackdown titles for this. Poor Kevin Owens and Finn Balor getting screwed here.
Thx for another video to fall asleep to
lol also my plan
For the record Eddie Guerrero was not a two time WWE tag team champion he was a four time WWE tag team champion. Twice with Chavo, once with Tajiri and once with Mysterio
Thats three....
@@NorbertŐszi-c1s TWICE (2) with Chavo, once (1) with Tajiri, and once (1) with Mysterio...
Booker T at the bottom: big oof
Kurt Angle third from bottom: oof so big it has its own gravitational field
Yup they even fumbled dean ambrose, who had 3 IC title reigns, one of which lasted 152 days!
@@Rashiddo I really must insist on seeing them do the arithmetic on this one, because if you average out the quality of the different tiers,
1. IC came first, pretty shortly after his debut and held together with Euro. Even the manner of dropping them protected him, because he wasn't pinned or submitted for either
2. World title. His first being in his maiden year, beating *the Motherfucking Rock* at the apex of his popularity and retaining it in a fuckin six man HIAC.
3. Tag. Debuted a whole new tag championship in the early days of the draft with Benoit, with whom he had amazing chemistry.
Banger. Banger. Banger
If I was doing a list of WCW Triple Crown champs, he'd probably be my #1.
@@Rashiddowas that IC reign even meaningful or am I thinking of when he barely defended his US championship.
@@daviddalrymple2284 and ironically Bret Hart would probably be at the arse end of that list
it should be like how i do it in efed. a world division, mid card, special rules, tag, and now trios. When you win 3 belts (1 from each group) you are triple crown and if you get them all across you are known as Grand Slam champion
That unstable line about Flair had me crying laughing lol 😂
Good god Bianca held that RAW title for 427 days? I’m so tired of her…
Use this comment for your disgust at putting Booker T at the bottom of the list.
😢
Bret Hart probably the greatest of all time. Hes been in the top 3 of any list cultaholic does. And rightfully so, i truly believe that Bret "Hitman" Hart is the greatest professional wrestler of all time.
Daniel Bryan was tag champions alongside Eric Rowan. Why was this left out?
Miz being above the shield is just hilarious.
It’s not really that crazy. Miz had some great tag and IC reigns. Ambrose didn’t do much with any of the belts, and Roman and Seth have had better times with other belts.
Earned. He's the only 2x Grand Slam champion and about the most reliable person this century.
@@wanderlustwarriorreliably shit yeah
He's awesome for a reason
@@Justin_North I mean, if it was ranking every IC champion then yeah, but there are so many clangers in this list. Angle at the bottom? Come the fuck on. How much time was there from his debut to being a double champion? And then beating the Rock for the big one pretty much as soon as he dropped?
Which IC title reign of Dean Ambrose’s did they forget to count? I’m assuming the 3rd one cos it was the shortest lol
This is probably the worst list y’ave done so far. When I saw Booker T and Kurt Angle dead last and Ronda Rousey so high up, I knew this list would be bad.
Here i am finding out Nikki Cross has won the tag titles twice
CM Punk Best in The World ❤. Greetings from Chile 🇨🇱
What a great way to spend an hour. Also I shouldn't have to mention this but it's there I am not a bot.
That's what a bot would say.
Sorry, boot
The bots are adapting, getting smarter
Benoit’s entry was treated with a deft hand. Respect
I wonder if Pedro Morales had to defend his title against the '70s equivalents of Kane and the Big Show.
You know: the guys they put up against champions they crowned "for the fans" instead of "for the McMahon."
Day 1 of asking you to apologize and redo this list because Dean is a 3X intercontinental title holding the title for 152 days!
I have to hand it to you, the man whose legs hate him, that got me.
Dolph is way too high..
Hows about every grand slam champion ranked under both formats.
Weird how the Universal and Smackdown tag belts don't count
Kane should have been used better
So if the US title doesn't count, why does the World heavyweight? Plus with the women's ic/us titles being added, the triple crown for them will be restarted
The Intercontinental title has been around longer. And the triple crown accolade was established when the US title was in WCW.
Damn idk why I felt the APA had lengthy reign with the tag titles at some point
Had to wait on you to announce Bret as number 1 before I liked and shared! 😅
Didn't Bryan and Rowan win the Smackdown tag titles?
Jeff Hardy is in a list of his own winning light heavyweight hardcore European Intercontinental tad team and wwe heavyweight titles
Bret the GOAT.
Hey Adam quick side note: Dean is a 3 times IC Champ not 2 times
You guys should also do Grand Slam champions
Imagine this Orton wins the title and loses it a screwy way and then he wins it back now he’s at 16 Orton drops the title then later vacate the title cena vs Orton for the record
lots of iconic names
Love you guys 😘 greetings from Sinaloa 🇲🇽
I mean, *technically*, Kevin Nash (maybe) did hold the WCW Television title. Scott Hall was a double champ (US and TV), he gave Nash the TV title, and Nash threw it in the trash all of 30 seconds later. But that should still count, dammit!
Big e over christian, punk is crazy
will you do a video of every grand slam champion in wwe ?
daniel bryan being that high when he didn’t even get a reign with the ic belt is crazy, cm punk and aj styles outrank him
1-3 are interchangeable but I would have the 2nd place as 1 the 3rd place at 2 and the 1st at 3
Dolph, And as much as I love them, Big E and Kofi are way too high.
I'm not gonna rag on Cultaholic as seems to be the norm around here, but what I will say is...
Big E???
CultaBOLLOCKS!
Appreciate the effort aside from that though
I thought this was AJPW's Triple Crown tho that would be a great vid
Jericho is my favourite but who better than BRET
Shawn
You should do a ranking video for grand slam champions
The next video should be about grand slam champions
Dude i used to hate jbl especially when he was wwe champion. But over time he’s definitely grown on me alot
flair is in the bottom 5 of triple crown winners , his best work was with the wwe title in 92 the rest were transitional periods
Honestly shame the Universal Championship doesn't count for some reason, you'd have Finn Balor, Kevin Owens and Braun Strowman on the list.
for some reason i thought Liv Morgan was a triple crown champ then i realized it was the the same belt twice but the first one was with that M&M colored belt
Can’t wait to see where my favorite fella Sheamus lands on this list! ……
Well there’s a women’s IC title now and there’s rumored to be a women’s US title so maybe it’ll be a bit easier for the women to get it instead of having to be the world champ in both brands
Guerrero is a 4 time tag champ, not 2 🤔
And ambrose is a 3 time IC champ not 2. The research on this list is utter rubbish
I remember as a child hearing about how Bret and Pedro had the Triple Crown....now it seems more normalized with 40+
But when Shawn won the GRANDSLAM It blew my little 6 year old mind
You mean there another level above the "Triple crown"
Shawn having over 300 total days with every belt was crazy to me
@SpaceGhost92 then he would find any way to NOT LOSE it
Mania 25 gets slept on. Besides the main event (same thing with Mania 22) it's an A show
Mania 25 is just too inconsistent and no near as good as the 8 Manias before it. I still have fond memories of it but sadly It’s still a one match show. HBK/Taker is literally the only match worth revisiting. There’s some gems like Jeff and Matt Hardy’s match but everything else is either forgettable or trash. 🗑️
Ok, im gonna bring the hate to me.....Matt was heavyweight champion before jeff
Asuka is to Charlotte as Undertaker is to Lesnar
Okay but why do you insist on reminding us that Ronda Rousey used to be a thing?
So where will Sheamus rank once/if he wins the IC title?
I wonder why the wwe doesn't count the US Title as a alternative to the IC Title
Its just show You how great are these champs if the bottom of the list is Booker, JBL and Kurt Angle
"Pull yourself together, idiot!"😂😂😂
Mercedes and Bliss are way too high up
Thanks 🎉
Edge didn't need to comeback like that BUT he took the risk ... and not leave on his terms ... again.
21:39 Um are we forgetting about Rowan here?
No I tried to hear you out but Angle being that low is baffling, lads...
The Miz at #6??? 😵💫
His IC reigns helped him a lot