Chain Drive Design Procedure

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 มิ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 53

  • @piyushajadhav9044
    @piyushajadhav9044 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much it helped me a lot

  • @robertmoreno8092
    @robertmoreno8092 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you have a simple equation for power in a two sprocket chain drive system.

  • @FloridaIndependent
    @FloridaIndependent ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how the design is based on breaking strength of the chain. But the computation of Ft, Fs and Fc are iffy.

  • @amaranthmurugan3960
    @amaranthmurugan3960 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are there any standard sizes of sprocket dia and chain length?

  • @vishwanathvpai4090
    @vishwanathvpai4090 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey, first of all...Great video sir ! At 4:52,the total on what is calculated ? front sprocket ? Also, shoudnt that be added vectorially ?

  • @techanicalstrikers176
    @techanicalstrikers176 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey bro in this play list please make on the video on design of flywheel springs brakes with the psg college of technology data book
    Make it completely like DME 2 book
    U r doing very good
    Well done

  • @harikrishnan3430
    @harikrishnan3430 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much sir..!!!!

  • @eway2subrata
    @eway2subrata 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    SO DIFFERENT FROM VB BHANDARI BOOK CHAIN DRIVE, WHICH ONE SHOULD BE FOLLOWED?

  • @spvids46
    @spvids46 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    please mention that book name with name of author which you are referring in your videos

  • @smilesmile6831
    @smilesmile6831 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The books which have mentioned 102 instead of 1020 aren't misprinted. In those Pt is in kgf instead of Newton. That's why ... Difference of 9.8(10 aprx)

    • @viswanadhamlokesh3964
      @viswanadhamlokesh3964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yep that's truee....

    • @smilesmile6831
      @smilesmile6831 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@viswanadhamlokesh3964
      Haha thanks for the reply. Because of ur reply I got to know about this comment of mine. Time flies! I was I engineering that time and was struggling hell lot with chain design...haha ... . 😄😄

  • @tarunsaichannel300
    @tarunsaichannel300 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you sir

  • @paranganathan710
    @paranganathan710 ปีที่แล้ว

    U DONT NEED TO HOPE THAT I UNDERSTOOD SIR
    FOR REAL I UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING]

  • @parthapratimnayak5791
    @parthapratimnayak5791 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pl give reason if motor and gearbox connect with single chain spoket if we use double spoket motor load increase or not.

  • @shrikantmaurya7961
    @shrikantmaurya7961 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please upload the design also in pdf format...that will be helpful...

  • @shubhamshinde4710
    @shubhamshinde4710 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, if center distance was not given, then how will you find step 4 i.e p(max)....?

  • @sasi2240
    @sasi2240 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u

  • @bluephoenix4745
    @bluephoenix4745 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you told that we should take((w/g)=m) but in the table weight is given and not mass

  • @nirajpandey2512
    @nirajpandey2512 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How to do sums when centre's distance not given,.?

    • @ROBOMECHTRIX
      @ROBOMECHTRIX  6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      For a question on chain drive, if the center distance is not given, I have a formula to calculate it on page 7.74.
      The formula states that the optimum distance is to be taken as a=(30 to 50)p. Pitch as we know can be selected from the same page or can be assumed, whichever is suited. This center distance can be an approximate value because at the very last, we calculate the final center distance once again corrected to even number of pitches from the formula on page 7.75!

  • @irfanhabib5919
    @irfanhabib5919 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir, how to determine output power when designing from scratch?

    • @kentlouieeyana7189
      @kentlouieeyana7189 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      sir I have the same issue, I am inquiring if you have solve this issue?

    • @irfanhabib5919
      @irfanhabib5919 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kentlouieeyana7189 not yet

  • @sumanthbhushan6840
    @sumanthbhushan6840 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i have a calculation to be done on Chain drive mechanism. Can anyone help me out with that ? Thanks in advance...

  • @milangurnule3277
    @milangurnule3277 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, you have said that we have to consider or prefer the transmission ratio if we won't given both N1 and N2. But while calculating the Pt we need N2 then from where we should take the speed. Plz revert

    • @ROBOMECHTRIX
      @ROBOMECHTRIX  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure we will get back to you.

  • @akhilpadmanabhan1240
    @akhilpadmanabhan1240 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello
    According to the data book page 7.78, w is weight/m in kgf (relating to centrifugal tension) while going back to the big table the value for weight/m is 1.78 in kgf so how did you conclude m=1.78kgf?
    While m being w/g, the units don't come up as kgf.. or I'm confused..
    Kindly explain..
    Thank you..

    • @ROBOMECHTRIX
      @ROBOMECHTRIX  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In step 6, I have put in 1.78 kgf but that is actually 1.78 kgf/m which when multiplied by the square of velocity which is (m/s)^2 automatically gives the value in Newtons.
      Hope this cleared the doubt. Feel free to reply back if it isn't clarified still.

    • @akhilpadmanabhan1240
      @akhilpadmanabhan1240 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ROBOMECHTRIX
      Oh sir I got but it still couldn't digest it.. like if it is (wv^2/g) the unit comes up as [kgf (m/s)^2 (m/s^2)^-1] since in the data book 7.72 it is said to consider weight per metre to be "kgf" and not "kgf/m" there is still an "m" left in multiplication with "kgf".. but okay.. if it was kgf/m then it would cancel out the "m" but still sir was it worthy of you to show only "w/g" to be in kgf.. the "v" part has also helped in bringing the value to "kgf m m^-1"
      Thank you for you reply sir it was very kind of you..

  • @abhinaytheruler
    @abhinaytheruler 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    dude in step 6 why didnt you convert kgf to newtons

    • @ROBOMECHTRIX
      @ROBOMECHTRIX  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      In step 6, I have put in 1.78 kgf but that is actually 1.78 kgf/m which when multiplied by the square of velocity which is (m/s)^2 automatically gives the value in Newtons.

  • @tirsoparis5307
    @tirsoparis5307 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Reference book?

  • @ajitkumarvishwakarma7276
    @ajitkumarvishwakarma7276 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    hello sir, in this entire solution the data that is power to be transmitted P=11 kW is no where used. Is it that the power to be transmitted does not affect the selection of the chain drive?

    • @abhinaytheruler
      @abhinaytheruler 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      kiya tho hai step 6

    • @ROBOMECHTRIX
      @ROBOMECHTRIX  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, it has been used in step number 6.

  • @himanshu9301
    @himanshu9301 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir if the center distance is not given in the question,how do we proceed?

    • @ROBOMECHTRIX
      @ROBOMECHTRIX  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For a question on chain drive, if the center distance is not given, I have a formula to calculate it on page 7.74.
      The formula states that the optimum distance is to be taken as a=(30 to 50)p. Pitch as we know can be selected from the same page or can be assumed, whichever is suited. This center distance can be an approximate value because at the very last, we calculate the final center distance once again corrected to even number of pitches from the formula on page 7.75!

    • @himanshu9301
      @himanshu9301 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sir I asked my college professor regarding this. I suggested him the same method you have described I.e assumption of pitch. But he said instead of assuming pitch ,assume the velocity. But the problem here is if we assume the velocity and find the breaking load,ultimately in order to calculate the exact center distance we need an assumed value.
      Sir can we assume the centre distance to 1500mm.? This was suggested by my college professor while taking this topic.

    • @ROBOMECHTRIX
      @ROBOMECHTRIX  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Assumption is one of the thing that can be anything, your professor might be correct too! But eventually if the actual center distance is eventually less, we will have to lower down the value anyways.
      Both the approaches can be used, but it is preferable that you follow what your professor has asked you to.

    • @himanshu9301
      @himanshu9301 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ROBOMECHTRIX thank you sir.

  • @anguscampbell1533
    @anguscampbell1533 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am testing ...

  • @paraspatidar7925
    @paraspatidar7925 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    where i can find design data book please help

  • @abdelrahmansabrah104
    @abdelrahmansabrah104 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you please upload the data book or give us a link to download it

    • @ROBOMECHTRIX
      @ROBOMECHTRIX  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The link of the book from which the formulas are taken is
      Amazon - www.amazon.in/Design-Data-Engineers-College-Kalaikathir-Coimbatore/dp/8192735508/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1508657797&sr=8-4&keywords=design+data+handbook

    • @abdelrahmansabrah104
      @abdelrahmansabrah104 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      no pdf version at all?

    • @ROBOMECHTRIX
      @ROBOMECHTRIX  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am not sure. You will have to check it out online.

    • @abdelrahmansabrah104
      @abdelrahmansabrah104 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      thanks a lot

    • @himanshusahu3081
      @himanshusahu3081 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      bro do you got it's pdf?

  • @yatniksawant6619
    @yatniksawant6619 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    units ki pure waat laga di hai sir ne

  • @FloridaIndependent
    @FloridaIndependent ปีที่แล้ว

    73.74 TEETH? How?

  • @vijayasunmathi6159
    @vijayasunmathi6159 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    At last step dr formula not in pg 7.72