Michel Foucault's "The Archaeology of Knowledge" (Part 2 of 4)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ต.ค. 2024
  • In this episode, I cover part 2 of Michel Foucault's "The Archaeology of Knowledge."
    Please consider donating to one of the following organizations:
    Palestinian Children's Relief Fund: pcrf1.app.neon...
    United Nations Relief and Works Agency: donate.unrwa.o...
    Middle East Children's Alliance:
    secure.everyac...
    Twitter: @DavidGuignion
    IG: @theory_and_philosophy
    Podbean: theoretician.p...

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @theboys9070
    @theboys9070 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks David for all the effort you put in to make these videos!

  • @paulwells411
    @paulwells411 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great work David, I've listened to most your videos on the "poststructualists/postmoderns" and with regards to Foucault in general, I feel so far this series has been the most clear and spot on - would love to hear to revisit The Order of Things after all these years. I loved that you tipped the hat to Baudrillard at the end there in the mirror of discourse and your reconciliation of these views. I struggle with this paradox in Foucault's work.

  • @enlightenedanalysis
    @enlightenedanalysis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey David. Thanks for these videos on Foucault. I really appreciate it. I just finished listening to your podcast on Foucault’s Madness and Civilisation - it was great. I’m going to your podcast on Discipline and Punish next.

  • @BrennenKing-d5w
    @BrennenKing-d5w 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excited for part 3

  • @maxbrecher1326
    @maxbrecher1326 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very well done

  • @Firmus777
    @Firmus777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You accuse Foucault of doing the exact thing he criticizes others for, but is he criticizing others in the sense that he is saying these practices are negative, or is he merely explaining how things are like?
    You also seem to be prone to the mistake of thinking that different discourses don't correctly present the objective reality. But Foucault's insight is much more radical than this. Different discourses are precisely what forms the objective reality.