Redefining test automation | Richard Bradshaw |

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Test Automation, a term everyone in testing probably hears on a regular basis, but what is it? If we listen to consultancies and tool vendors, it’s the holy grail. If we listen to some gurus in the testing space it’s the current and future of testing. Others are more conservative. However, I commonly hear people say Test Automation when they actually mean Automated Testing, to be frank, they’ve become synonyms.
    This confuses me. As a skilled tester I use automation and tools all the time, some I create, some I download, but automated tests they are not. I’ve built automation to help my team create data, I’ve built low tech dashboards and I’ve built tools to install my mobile app under test on as many devices as I could connect to my computer. I’ve written tiny little scripts, they saved me hours on a weekly basis. All these tools provided a lot of value. I’ve also built numerous architectures to do automated checking, which just like my tools, provided a lot of value. My focus on all these occasions was my testing mission.
    So, what is Test Automation? How can we succeed with it? What skills do we need to succeed with it? Questions I’ve been pondering for the last four years, and I think I finally have some answers. Not just answers though, I also have lots of actionable advice for you to take back to work. This advice will be woven between real examples like those listed above, exploring why I created them, the skills needed and how they helped me with my testing mission. To keep the balance, I’ve also included lots of stories where my automated approach has failed and how I learnt from it.
    Takeaways
    Models to take back to work to challenge your existing use of automation
    A list of skills required to succeed with automation that you can use to plan your learning
    A list of techniques to spot opportunities for valuable automation in your context
    About Richard Bradshaw
    Richard Bradshaw is an experienced tester, consultant, trainer and generally a friendly guy. He shares his passion for testing through consulting, training and giving presentations on a variety of topics relating to testing. With over 12 years of testing experience, he has a lot of insights in the world of testing and software development.
    Richard is currently the BossBoss at the Ministry of Testing, co-creator of the Automation in Testing (AiT) namespace, blogs at automationintesting.com and thefriendlytester.co.uk. Tweeting over at @FriendlyTester and also the creator of the TH-cam channel Whiteboard Testing.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 9

  • @kanto501
    @kanto501 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    wow! one of the first seleniumconf talks I could understand, most of the talks I find way over my head and talking about something so complicated I would never ever use.

    • @awsumgeorge
      @awsumgeorge 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      try this one, th-cam.com/video/rvcMIYy47xw/w-d-xo.html; same presenter, but it goes into details. The whole talk is essentially about a single slide from this one talk.

  • @187nellybelly
    @187nellybelly 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great talk on automation Richard!

  • @calkelpdiver
    @calkelpdiver 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Yep, utility scripts to create test data can be quite valuable. Automation isn't always about the test/check itself, their are other opportunities to leverage your tool to help you do your job.

  • @jakessentle1608
    @jakessentle1608 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great talk indeed, so insightful

  •  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great point on testability !

  • @elgatov823
    @elgatov823 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    there are still valid reasons to check if an element disappeared from the page, though

  • @pcloudy
    @pcloudy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good one

  • @shining-ana418
    @shining-ana418 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Haha yep, big consultancies are more like tool agencies or Dell for tools.