On Touching: The Alterity Within, Karen Barad

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @IzzyCubito
    @IzzyCubito 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This lecture is in itself a projection from 2018 to today 2020 and our lives as we have begun social distancing, no touching, not understanding our relationship with another human being...

  • @newoysters9884
    @newoysters9884 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you

  • @JakeBuckley-i1c
    @JakeBuckley-i1c ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does anyone have a citation on who this person is referring to here? at 47:15?

    • @Jules_Dufresne
      @Jules_Dufresne ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think the abyss is a key concept in Edouard Glissant's work, but as an example : " Yet, the belly of this boat dissolves you, precipi­tates you into a nonworld from which you cry out. This boat is a womb, a womb abyss."
      Glissant, E. (1997) The Poetics of Relation.

  • @bert6644
    @bert6644 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Brilliant

  • @natalie.natalie.natalie
    @natalie.natalie.natalie 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really good.

  • @johnhannon8034
    @johnhannon8034 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    An example of what can happen when a physicist refuses to simply “shut up and calculate.”
    Although she doesn’t use the term, Barad seems to be espousing panpsychism here.

  • @thulaniearnshaw4094
    @thulaniearnshaw4094 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    $$$$$$$$$$$$$

  • @gregyoung3243
    @gregyoung3243 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is she just saying touch is an emergent phenomenon? Electrons don’t touch, so we never touch. Seems trivial

  • @vinylmeister2165
    @vinylmeister2165 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Not physics

    • @macguy14
      @macguy14 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      physics is understanding the movement between bodies

  • @objektivone3209
    @objektivone3209 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The lady does not have an
    idea what she is saying.

    • @monstersoftheid4693
      @monstersoftheid4693 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      May it not be truer to say that you have no idea?

    • @kevinilango7896
      @kevinilango7896 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@monstersoftheid4693 do you know what they are saying? a lot of "meeting the universe halfway" from my reading is just inaccessible vocabulary. barad seems so dependent on foucault but is also trying to distinguish their work from his. the only example of intra-action that they have admitted concretely is that they wrote the book and the book wrote them.

    • @Uzmacakekitchen
      @Uzmacakekitchen ปีที่แล้ว

      She is an outstanding speaker

  • @Ronnybengt
    @Ronnybengt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant