3D Printed V2 Pressure Engine

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ค. 2024
  • So I made my next try at making an air pressure engine! The results have increased the efficiency of the engine by a literal order of magnitude... Wonder if it is possible to squeeze out another order of magnitude improvement with V3, mmh?
    Hope you enjoyed the video! And I hope You have a great day!
    Printables page with .STL files and an assembly manual for if you are considering replicating this engine... or generally just want to know a bit more about the construction of the engine.
    www.printables.com/model/2710...
    Tom Stanton's Diaphragm Engine video for if you want to know a bit more in-depth what each bit in this design choice does - • Diaphragm Air Engine
    Propeller from Thingiverse - www.thingiverse.com/thing:261...
    Music from TH-cam Audio Library and Pixabay
    =|Chapters|=
    0:00 - OP-1, the previous work
    0:34 - BMV1, the prototype
    2:12 - BMV2-V2, the result
    2:51 - Engine explanation
    4:17 - Testing
    5:33 - Actually kinda rubbish?
    6:22 - Closing words and future plans
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @BirdbrainEngineer
    @BirdbrainEngineer  ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hey there! If you are looking for the STL files of the BMV2-V2 engine showcased, then you can find a link to the Printables page in the description of the video!
    Hope You enjoyed the video!

  • @veyselk.a698
    @veyselk.a698 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thats a beatiful video and channel I love it

  • @Nixqy
    @Nixqy ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Have recently found your channel, really enjoying your videos! Designing my own engine and your design has given me a bunch of inspiration!

  • @Edward-pw6zz
    @Edward-pw6zz ปีที่แล้ว +2

    damn, you have improved a lot since your earlier videos, i really like this video style! the engine is awesome and i think there is a lot of potential!!! cant wait for more videos!!!

  • @swecreations
    @swecreations ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How does this only have 800 views??

  • @asdasdasdasdasddd123
    @asdasdasdasdasddd123 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    absolutely love the videos

  • @unusualfabrication9937
    @unusualfabrication9937 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    cool as hell

  • @nuttyDesignAndFab
    @nuttyDesignAndFab 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you could probably skip the rubber membrane; rubber has a lot of hysteresis that eats your efficiency. these things often have some sort of slippery plastic piston seals? teflon, UHMW Polyethylene, or maybe nylon?

  • @Stubert619
    @Stubert619 ปีที่แล้ว

    legend

  • @fernandoandaluz2281
    @fernandoandaluz2281 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Make a boat with a compressed air reservoir and see how it goes 😊

    • @BirdbrainEngineer
      @BirdbrainEngineer  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A boat might indeed be the one :D

    • @fernandoandaluz2281
      @fernandoandaluz2281 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BirdbrainEngineer Let's make it happen captain 😉👍🏼

  • @Koto-Sama
    @Koto-Sama ปีที่แล้ว +2

    a train would be nice. we have seen cars and planes before but not a train

  • @rsantana2021
    @rsantana2021 ปีที่แล้ว

    What software are you using for the exploded view animation?

  • @Lucas_sGarage
    @Lucas_sGarage ปีที่แล้ว +1

    imagine using liquid nitrogen as a source of air and then a 3 way valve to redirect the gas flow to the engine) another option is liquid butane, but it's inflammable, so... maybe the liquid that is on air cans is an option

    • @BirdbrainEngineer
      @BirdbrainEngineer  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The problem with using liquefied gases is that as they change from liquid to gaseous phase, they cool down... *a lot*. Not only does this mean lost energy for running the engine, it also means the engine gets cooled down, often down to cryogenic temperatures, which would destroy the diaphragm(s) of the engine.

    • @Lucas_sGarage
      @Lucas_sGarage ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BirdbrainEngineer probably a radiator is required in between to allow enough time to normalize the gas

    • @BirdbrainEngineer
      @BirdbrainEngineer  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Lucas_sGarage A heat exchanger to heat up the gas before it is used in the engine would work, but in most cases you'd be better off creating something akin to a steam engine then instead.

    • @Lucas_sGarage
      @Lucas_sGarage ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BirdbrainEngineer i was just thinking about weight/performance ratio

  • @shrimpsoldier9780
    @shrimpsoldier9780 ปีที่แล้ว

    First :) also really awesome video also would be cool to see it on a bike

  • @vatonix84
    @vatonix84 ปีที่แล้ว

    This engine design is very similar to Tom Stantons engine, although he did get the inspiration from old air hogs engines

    • @BirdbrainEngineer
      @BirdbrainEngineer  ปีที่แล้ว

      It is brought up in the video, that it is certainly inspired by Tom Stanton's design, though there are some differences such as a different crankshaft design and the different diaphragm material, which allows it to work at very low pressures. (And of course - this engine is a V2)

    • @vatonix84
      @vatonix84 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BirdbrainEngineer none the less, a very big round of a applause for creating a new design

  • @ryanellis4383
    @ryanellis4383 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Printed props just really suck, especially compared to carbon ones. I set up a thrust test stand a while back and I found that the same pitch and diameter produced less than half of the thrust, when compared to cheap plastic props. Considering Tom used an even fancier prop, this could have a lot to do with the results.

    • @BirdbrainEngineer
      @BirdbrainEngineer  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yep, it did occur to me, and for future, I have already ordered carbon fiber props of different sizes... Couldn't really that easily choose the prop pitch though, as they were meant for some large drones I guess.

  • @kennyking9667
    @kennyking9667 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Plane

    • @BirdbrainEngineer
      @BirdbrainEngineer  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Will have to dramatically increase the efficiency and lose weight before I could get a flying plane to work... but I may try that some day.

  • @AiOinc1
    @AiOinc1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your flywheel is pretty badly out of balance. If you're interested in air engines, you should look into the Lego Vacuum Engine community. Easier to design and make much more power.
    I have personally seen my inline twin reach ~1600rpm and produce almost 35 watts (from a three phase motor to a rectifier and through a variable resistor)

    • @BirdbrainEngineer
      @BirdbrainEngineer  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The flywheel for the prototype was horrid, yes.
      Problem with lego engines is that they are way less precise than 3d printed stuff and moreover... they are *massive* compared to 3d printed engines. The reason I do not want to make a vacuum engine for now, is because I want the engine to be capable of powering something as a self-contained unit (eg. a boat)... having a vacuum cleaner pipe constantly attached to the thing that is being powered just sorta feels like cheating and a bit of a copout :P

  • @IStreebok
    @IStreebok 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Великолепно...
    Но лучшее, что может сделать женщина - это родить мужчину 😘