@@sep1364-l3d😂😂Desperate Dems couldn’t even beat “Hitler “!!😂Very uneducated,when it comes to economics!!!!💯Americans want zero to do with corrupt politicians! Sorry,it’s over,smarten up! Good luck ever seeing the WH again🤡’s!!! It’s TRUMP time!!! We have 💯faith in Trump! Get over it!!
I’m a birthright guy. Deport me, we don’t give a damn. We Americans will always be Americans here or in Mexico. I’ll survive here or anywhere else. We will come back trump. Go ahead. Time for America to learn a lesson
The Supreme Court will interpret the 14 th Amendment as stated, no longer allowing it to be used as a “loophole” to allow “anchor babies” as a pathway to U.S. citizenship,the free ride is over,waving around your flag is over,taxpayers paying your way is over.
They can try to argue that illegal migrants are not subject to the laws of the United States by virtue of the fact that the law was not applied to them as it relates to their immigration status. Trump's supreme court will then lap it up like they did Roe V Wade
If he loses, he should pass a law that if you're a kid of illegal migrants (anchor baby) you're mandatory 1 contract (8yrs) military service at the age of 18 or your parents will be deported, and you won't be granted social security or benefits for the rest of your life. If you complete your service, you can then claim your parents.
@@Easymadeit If you're "subject to the jurisdiction", that means subject to US law. If 8llegals aren't subject to US law, they effectively have diplomatic immunity.
You're leaving out part of it. "And subject to the jurisdiction thereof", illegals are subjects in a different jurisdiction than the U.S. Besides, why do you care? Oh, you like your country being invaded? You like all those future democrat voters coming in? You're pathetic.
@ wtf? No they don't. Diplomates do, and anyone from any country that can get into a foreign embassy - but not immigrants, asylum seekers, any other human in the US. BABIES born in the United States are CITIZENS - and they'r erights are YOU rights.
@@Easymadeit Ever read the thing? Didn't think so past A2 *Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1* : _All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside_
The issue here is jurisdiction and there is precedent case law on the subject. A baby born in the US by an illegal alien is not automatically subject to the jurisdiction of the US Government. Ask yourself why a LEGAL immigrant must meet mandatory residency prerequisites, learn English, AND SWEAR AN OATH OF ALLEGIANCE to the US Government before becoming a NATURALIZED Citizen. All of these requirements must be met before citizenship is granted and the applicant becomes SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION of the US Government affording all the privileges thereof. Misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment for a long period of time does make the misinterpretation correct. It means that existing case law is being ignored to promote something that does not exist for a desired outcome. When this case is heard by the SCOTUS the ruling will support the opinion of President Trump so every effort will be made to ridicule (existing case law) and to keep the issue out of the Courts review.
Sorry that is false. Everyone in the United States is subject to the jurisdiction of it no matter where they are from. If you are not subject to the jurisdiction of the country you are in that law cannot be appied to you. You cannot say someone is illegal if you have no jurisdiction over them. you cannot arrest, them, deport because you have no jurisdiction over them. You cannot have this both ways.
Because even every “sh*thole” country in the world does. You can’t own property in Mexico unless you are native born. America could take a page And quit allowing Chinese shell companies buy up American food production plants in the Midwest. Or are you from the Liberal elite suburbs?
@@redscope897 - The issue the courts will end up having to decide is if this section of the Constitution, "and not subject to any foreign power", includes babies conceived in other countries to people who are subject to foreign powers. Keep in mind the original intention of the law as it relates to slavery and the fact slaves had been sold off from their original continent/homes and were no longer subject to any government other than the U.S. I can very easily see the Supreme Court ruling in Trump's favor on this given the wording of the Constitution itself.
@@c-gunz4482 14 Amendment contains nothing at all about slavery nor does it contain anything about parents, the legal status of them at all. It states the person born in the country it does not say anything at all about parents being subject to other foreign power. Here is the thing people in the USA are allowed to be dual Citizens. What the foreign powers means is you are not subject to the Jurisdiction of a foreign power. If your in the USA only 2 conditions I am aware of exist if you are in American Samoa or you have diplomatic immunity and hence outside of Jurisdiction of ther United States. I am pretty certain in 99% of the cases neither of those two conditions would be true and hence the kid being born would not be subject to foreign powers typically. I see zero chance of anyone with a basic knowledge of the constitution ruling in Trump favour.
@ - interesting interpretation but not sure anyone would ever use that argument in court though; which is where this will end up being decided. The history and original intent of the amendment will play a major part in any court's final ruling, so you can ignore the slavery aspect if you want. Saying "it contains nothing about slavery" isn't a valid legal argument when discussing the wording of the amendment.
No, more than 30 countries have this law including Canada and Mexico - countries built by settlers and slaves. And other countries that removed birthright citizenship did so through proper process not overnight EOs and put in place policies to provide a pathway to citizenship for children born in their countries after some years of residence and irrespective of the parents immigration status. How cruel must one be to treat a child as a second class citizen and throw them out for being born in a place and time that they had no control over. This is unlawful, unamerican, inhumane and not Christian at all!
You know they can grandfather people in right? After Biden’s last 4 years the progressives have lost all moral grounds. Game on for Trump at this point.
@@wsbs520no she wasn’t American when she gave birth to Barron do some research smfh🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️ she even worked illegally before getting a work visa lol
what did he do in 2019 when he let more immigrants STAY than had even come to the border for any of the last 10 years before that? Every hear of a guy who starts a fire then acts the heroo putting it out? yeah, that guy. How about ban tik tok, lose, a law gets passed to ban it, then 'save' tik tok, yeah that guy and yeah, that thing ICE FY 2019 has your answer
You do mean Jim **Acostya**. Never forget big tough guy Jimmy boi Acostya bullying the microphone away from the 110 pound female white house staffer during a Trump press conference. Such a tough guy.
Instead of having a debate you are just being critical of him. Allowing birthright citizenship shows America as defender of individual rights and freedom. The moral compass of the country that every new life on the American soil gets the same rights as its citizen. which is why its extend to embassies and army bases i.e. basically every part of Earth under the jurisdiction of US govt. I think subject to jurisdiction thereof applies to that, that all parts of the Earth and Mars as somebody joked under US control. but the President carries the will of the people. Remember he is directly elected by the public. The will of the people comes first.
PS 77.1 million votes for President Trump and 74.7 million votes for Vice President Harris.36% of the country 's voting-eligible population didn't vote in this election. So. 89,278 948 didn't vote.
Instead of talking how illegal immigrant should be allowed to be working, why don't you discuss how to give them an expedite or temporary stay in the country? Using illegal workers is immoral because they can be abused.
The order was expected to face legal hurdles as birthright citizenship is enshrined in the constitution. But it can be politically rewarding for trump. Irrespective of the US SC verdict the executive order has sent a signal and a message that america will now be less warm and less receptive to the idea of immigration and immigrants. Trump must heed the economic argument on immigration.
The judge needs to read up on how the amendment was passed in the first place! The person who wrote the original language of the amendment said it did not confer citizenship on a baby born in the U.S. *of foreign parents who were 'subject to the jurisdiction' of their home country - not the United States!* That's why the language is in the amendment "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof..." This amendment was originally, specifically interpreted at the time to confer citizenship on former slaves!
By your logic, the babies of permanent residents and dual citizens should not get birthright citizenship? Trump does not exclude them - why is he inconsistent? Basically he is just picking and choosing who he thinks should get birthright citizenship as the amendment is clear that all babies born in the US and subject to the jurisdiction (nothing about parents) should get citizenship. The only exceptions are babies with diplomatic immunity, babies of invading armies, and babies born in Native American tribal lands which all have their own set of rules.
Also the amendment was meant to be non exclusionary- slaves were just one subset and the SC later clarified that it would apply to children born to foreign citizens as the children are still subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. (read the Wong Kim Ark case)
We have the same problem in Canada taking rooms away from citizens then leaving the country without paying the bill. Companies advertise this in Asian countries and charge big bucks to organise
Did that pink woman just talk about fairness? Asking a baby who had no choice on where they were born if it is fair they were born where they were born
We gotta learn to start speaking the way they do... By "blocking" the order, we really mean "embracing" the order, see. So, it's fine. Don't worry about it.
Please improve the lower thirds. If you don’t know who these panelists are, I can just have this conversation in my kitchen. Abby’s team needs to step it up for this Black woman. She’s a smooth moderator and journalist.
Birthright citizenship was meant for the offspring of black slaves in the U.S., which was why the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868. It's wasn't meant to be abused by illegal immigrants and corrupt politicians, or for foreigners that weren't slaves in the U.S.. Every right black Americans fought and won was given more to other groups and not to black Americans of who theses hard fought gains were meant for.. Reparations is owed.
The issue the courts will end up having to decide is if this section of the Constitution, "and not subject to any foreign power", includes babies conceived in other countries to people who are subject to foreign powers. Keep in mind the original intention of the law as it relates to slavery and the fact slaves had been sold off from their original continent/homes and were no longer subject to any government other than the U.S. I can very easily see the Supreme Court ruling in Trump's favor on this given the wording of the Constitution itself.
first :Better focus on changing laws of using weapons in this country and how many innocent children have died in this country. Second : Combating the import of fentanyl
According to my DNA, even if they went back to the original constitution as a Spanish American, I would be cool forget the amended one let’s go to the original. The amended one was a nightmare.
@@keithosmond5730 Democrats Soy Boys who call people fascists should easliy move to Canada. It will be easy for them because everyone knows their boyfriends already packed their shit for them... 😂
@@Rumpelstiltskin-s8e Bravo. Isnt this typical of those Trump supporters? Constantly whining. Like Trump. I swear, I have never heard a grown man bellyache and complain as much as that liar. They usually get their news from Fox news who has been sued for MILLIONS of dollars for lying. Yet, they swear they heard the gospel.
His followers are losing their uneducated minds and I love it. The Appeals Court needs to stop hearing these cases that makes no sense. A waste of taxpayers money. That’s how you stop dumb cases going to the Supreme Court. You deny to hear their dumb cases. ****Anyone who respond to my comment will be talking to themselves. I never receive any notifications for comments so if you like talking to yourself, go right ahead.*****
His followers are losing their uneducated minds and I love it. ****Anyone who respond to my comment will be talking to themselves. I never receive any notifications for comments so if you like talking to yourself, go right ahead.*****
We can get the full context of the phrase that the founders inserted in the 14th amendment if we go to the Congressional Record of 1868. The phrase in question is…. … and subject to the jurisdiction thereof’
Could it be written more plainly? I don't think so. Forget your feelings, read the document. Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1 : *_All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside._*
It was a great amendment for its time and circumstances, but times have changed. America was founded by settlers. Immigrants came later.. My belief is that the amendment needs to be changed for now.
lets have this situation : two native-born american people travel abroad and unexpectedly childen is born outside USA teritory. could that foreign‐born children (having native-born american parents) , could that children be president of USA ?
Are the cowboy hats multiplying? Is it some kind of inside joke we don't know about? I can't take these guys seriously when they're wearing these giant, comical hats. I hope I'm not the only one who sees the hats... because people are pretending like they're normal! 😂
The Constitution is a living document it can be amended. American citizenship comes with benefits. Everybody can't be a citizen. Maybe they should focus on what type of country we want for our children. We need jobs and schools that educate. All of this is a distraction.
Oh dear...first we had the Covid virus spreading, recently we've seen Avian Flu spreading. Your show suggests cowboy hats indoors is a virus spreading too! 😅
Who are any of these people on this panel. No wonder CNN is collapsing in ratings.
And yet here you are commenting. If you want them to collapse, stop watching and commenting on their videos.
Did you come from FOX just to troll?
Sometimes I go to FOX to call Jeanine a drunk, and to tell Gutfield he’s going to have a stroke 😂😅😊
The lefty lone ranger had me spitting milk out my nose.
I despise corporate media, but a simple research will show ratings have increased.
So, stop being ignorant.
@ a couple weeks ago the big news was CNN having less actual viewers during prime time than Food Channel reruns. Go ahead and fact check me.
Birthright citizenship was during slavery times
Look look, a MAGA slave Is talking 😮
"right to bear arms" was during muskets not automatic weapons.
@@kevinlawrence2229 you are so right, let's get rid of the guns
So amend it the proper way genius
@@kevinlawrence2229 So?
Give me a break, he already knows how his Supreme Court plants will vote.
Yay😂
Plants? Yup if he wants a tree 😂 basement dwellers can't even spell correctly yet English is the main language
@@sep1364-l3d not flipping that one cletus - trump refers to his supporters as basement dwellers OWN IT, don't project it
@@sep1364-l3d😂😂Desperate Dems couldn’t even beat “Hitler “!!😂Very uneducated,when it comes to economics!!!!💯Americans want zero to do with corrupt politicians! Sorry,it’s over,smarten up! Good luck ever seeing the WH again🤡’s!!! It’s TRUMP time!!! We have 💯faith in Trump! Get over it!!
Let's hope you are right!
No, he won’t back down. When this goes to the SC he will win.
Nope.
What can we expect after America elected a self serving criminally indicted insurrectionist sexual harassing orange crook.
@@Rumpelstiltskin-s8etypical Democrat you'll destroy the country for your hate of Donald Trump it's insane you people are crazy
@ apparently you’ve never read the Constitution. The dimocratic party is about to get a lesson.
@@stephenpritchard8787 You have no idea how the Constitution works. Trumpers are going to get one hell of a civics lesson.
I’m a birthright guy. Deport me, we don’t give a damn. We Americans will always be Americans here or in Mexico. I’ll survive here or anywhere else. We will come back trump. Go ahead. Time for America to learn a lesson
Sure bud
@ God bless you 🙏🏽
You're making zero sense, but ok.
nope he will take it to supreme court and they will change it for him
He can declare himself emperor and the Republican supreme court will oblige
No they won’t. There is no mechanism to change the constitution with executive order. It’s not a thing. It’s just posturing.
The Supreme Court will interpret the 14 th Amendment as stated, no longer allowing it to be used as a “loophole” to allow “anchor babies” as a pathway to U.S. citizenship,the free ride is over,waving around your flag is over,taxpayers paying your way is over.
@@madarauchihaSTLthey better
They can try to argue that illegal migrants are not subject to the laws of the United States by virtue of the fact that the law was not applied to them as it relates to their immigration status. Trump's supreme court will then lap it up like they did Roe V Wade
“Woke ideology is the cancer that must be removed"
Javier Milei
💥🤨💯%
Guess the founding fathers, the authors of the constitution must have been woke then. 😊
What's woke to you? What does it mean?
@@hotboy757the ability to find outrage in everything while ignoring your own hypocrisy
Racism is worldwide !!!
If he loses, he should pass a law that if you're a kid of illegal migrants (anchor baby) you're mandatory 1 contract (8yrs) military service at the age of 18 or your parents will be deported, and you won't be granted social security or benefits for the rest of your life. If you complete your service, you can then claim your parents.
Who the heck is the woman that doesn’t think it’s “fair” ??? WTF CNN
Its says right there in the 14th Amendment THEY ARE CITIZENS
He ain't THAT stupid
This is a direct violation of his Oath of Office
No it doesn’t what are you talking about?
@@Easymadeit If you're "subject to the jurisdiction", that
means subject to US law. If 8llegals aren't subject to US law, they
effectively have diplomatic immunity.
You're leaving out part of it. "And subject to the jurisdiction thereof", illegals are subjects in a different jurisdiction than the U.S. Besides, why do you care? Oh, you like your country being invaded? You like all those future democrat voters coming in? You're pathetic.
@ wtf? No they don't. Diplomates do, and anyone from any country that can get into a foreign embassy - but not immigrants, asylum seekers, any other human in the US. BABIES born in the United States are CITIZENS - and they'r erights are YOU rights.
@@Easymadeit
Ever read the thing? Didn't think so past A2
*Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1* : _All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside_
Y'all haven't been right yet
why are they wearing hats in the studio. so stupid.
The issue here is jurisdiction and there is precedent case law on the subject. A baby born in the US by an illegal alien is not automatically subject to the jurisdiction of the US Government. Ask yourself why a LEGAL immigrant must meet mandatory residency prerequisites, learn English, AND SWEAR AN OATH OF ALLEGIANCE to the US Government before becoming a NATURALIZED Citizen. All of these requirements must be met before citizenship is granted and the applicant becomes SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION of the US Government affording all the privileges thereof. Misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment for a long period of time does make the misinterpretation correct. It means that existing case law is being ignored to promote something that does not exist for a desired outcome. When this case is heard by the SCOTUS the ruling will support the opinion of President Trump so every effort will be made to ridicule (existing case law) and to keep the issue out of the Courts review.
Sorry that is false. Everyone in the United States is subject to the jurisdiction of it no matter where they are from. If you are not subject to the jurisdiction of the country you are in that law cannot be appied to you. You cannot say someone is illegal if you have no jurisdiction over them. you cannot arrest, them, deport because you have no jurisdiction over them. You cannot have this both ways.
Because even every “sh*thole” country in the world does.
You can’t own property in Mexico unless you are native born.
America could take a page
And quit allowing Chinese shell companies buy up American food production plants in the Midwest.
Or are you from the Liberal elite suburbs?
@@redscope897 -
The issue the courts will end up having to decide is if this section of the Constitution, "and not subject to any foreign power", includes babies conceived in other countries to people who are subject to foreign powers. Keep in mind the original intention of the law as it relates to slavery and the fact slaves had been sold off from their original continent/homes and were no longer subject to any government other than the U.S.
I can very easily see the Supreme Court ruling in Trump's favor on this given the wording of the Constitution itself.
@@c-gunz4482 14 Amendment contains nothing at all about slavery nor does it contain anything about parents, the legal status of them at all. It states the person born in the country it does not say anything at all about parents being subject to other foreign power. Here is the thing people in the USA are allowed to be dual Citizens. What the foreign powers means is you are not subject to the Jurisdiction of a foreign power. If your in the USA only 2 conditions I am aware of exist if you are in American Samoa or you have diplomatic immunity and hence outside of Jurisdiction of ther United States. I am pretty certain in 99% of the cases neither of those two conditions would be true and hence the kid being born would not be subject to foreign powers typically. I see zero chance of anyone with a basic knowledge of the constitution ruling in Trump favour.
@ - interesting interpretation but not sure anyone would ever use that argument in court though; which is where this will end up being decided.
The history and original intent of the amendment will play a major part in any court's final ruling, so you can ignore the slavery aspect if you want. Saying "it contains nothing about slavery" isn't a valid legal argument when discussing the wording of the amendment.
Dictators and wanna be dictators do not back down
Invading welfare leeches gonna play the system. It soon ends.
We are the only country that has that law.
No, more than 30 countries have this law including Canada and Mexico - countries built by settlers and slaves. And other countries that removed birthright citizenship did so through proper process not overnight EOs and put in place policies to provide a pathway to citizenship for children born in their countries after some years of residence and irrespective of the parents immigration status. How cruel must one be to treat a child as a second class citizen and throw them out for being born in a place and time that they had no control over. This is unlawful, unamerican, inhumane and not Christian at all!
People jumping the fence and then having babies that we have to take care of forever is bad policy and bad law.
Who is " We " most Trumpers cant afford a cyber truck let alone eggs.
WHO IS WE AGAIN?
@Rumpelstiltskin-s8e The American tax payer.
What an ignorant response. What can we expect after America elected a self serving criminally indicted insurrectionist sexual harassing orange crook.
@@Rumpelstiltskin-s8eyeah. Poor people suck. Especially poor illegal aliens. Amirite
@@Rumpelstiltskin-s8eI don’t think he’s talking about welfare recipients like you
The law was to protect freed slaves, not criminals invading America!😂😂
Perfectly said!
There is no invasion of America pull your head outta trumps asshole and use your two brain cells and do a little thinking
@@Paul-lm5gvnot really as protection is not the word
Yes well now the Chinese are invading, so what do we do ?
Liberia was supposed to have been a viable option, and we all know what happened there.
Has he ever backed down? 😅
Nope Nope Nope
@@porterdor39
He certainly has. He backed down on Mexico paying for the wall. He backed down on replacing Obamacare with something better.
@@kazkazimierz1742 he backed down on infrastructure "week" and he backed down in over a thousand lawsuits in business
Perhaps, Ban on" birth right citizen ship needs to one year time since (21 st January 2026) so that mother May prepare for delivery place
Ending birthright citizenship is a right decision
Good job
Trump
They're going back. Like it or not.
does that mean Baron is deported?
@ chrispery9002 and guess what ? Many will turn around and come right back
Agreed. Close the loop hole
@mycat2230, Good question, you should call Tom Homan’s office and share your insight
Ask Pam Bondi. She said she would never do anything unconstitutional
What about his son who is born under that act....!!!!
Making America Great Again!
You mean MAF - Making America Fascist. Or MAHA - Make America Hate Again.
Time for a new, more accurate red hat.
this 2 cowboy clowns are a total joke
Thank you president Trump ❤
What can we expect after America elected a self serving criminally indicted insurrectionist sexual harassing orange crook.
For what... tearing up the constitution? Promoting hate? Moving the US toward being a fascist autocracy?
Is he trying to deport his son?
You know they can grandfather people in right? After Biden’s last 4 years the progressives have lost all moral grounds. Game on for Trump at this point.
Melanie was a legal American when she had Barron
@@wsbs520no she wasn’t American when she gave birth to Barron do some research smfh🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️ she even worked illegally before getting a work visa lol
@@joshuapounds7646doesn't matter. Trump IS legal even if Melania wasn't.
@@jamesestelle7260 I mean, if we're gonna play this game - His grandparents weren't, which means his parents weren't, which means he isn't.
Thank you president Trump for your great Supreme Court, the greatest gift to America
Try to pass out face down.
That way, you won't choke on your drool.
Let's make Mexico our prison. Anyone who commits a crime, they are stripped of citizenship and are immediately deported south of the border.
@@mickmccrory8534stop spreading hate!!!
@@mickmccrory8534💥🫵🤡
@@mickmccrory8534 Rage on little man, you’re in for a wild ride these next 4 years.
Trump is doing the right thing at the right time. Go go go Trumpet.
what did he do in 2019 when he let more immigrants STAY than had even come to the border for any of the last 10 years before that? Every hear of a guy who starts a fire then acts the heroo putting it out? yeah, that guy. How about ban tik tok, lose, a law gets passed to ban it, then 'save' tik tok, yeah that guy and yeah, that thing ICE FY 2019 has your answer
Ignoring the constitution is "the right thing"???
Jim Acosta now moves to the midnight slot🙂
You do mean Jim **Acostya**. Never forget big tough guy Jimmy boi Acostya bullying the microphone away from the 110 pound female white house staffer during a Trump press conference. Such a tough guy.
About time. Hope he takes Kaitlyn colloins, tapper and Dana with him.
yeah ..... big lose there .... LOL
Womp womp
Only thing better than that is to schedule his show in a 30 second time slot.
He was about to tell a big lie
Trump is a smart man. He knows what he's doing.
Why doesn't he show us that?
@@mycat2230WTF? Is this a sentence?😂😂
What can we expect after America elected a self serving criminally indicted insurrectionist sexual harassing orange crook.
@ Excuse me, I corrected it, thank you.
@mycat2230 Trump beat Biden, Kamala, Cheney, Obama, Clinton, MSNBC, and CNN, but he's not smart?
Let's hope not. We need it ended. They're wrecking our social services and our schools and our hospitals.
Instead of having a debate you are just being critical of him. Allowing birthright citizenship shows America as defender of individual rights and freedom. The moral compass of the country that every new life on the American soil gets the same rights as its citizen. which is why its extend to embassies and army bases i.e. basically every part of Earth under the jurisdiction of US govt. I think subject to jurisdiction thereof applies to that, that all parts of the Earth and Mars as somebody joked under US control.
but the President carries the will of the people. Remember he is directly elected by the public. The will of the people comes first.
Do you know how racist you sound?
PS 77.1 million votes for President Trump and 74.7 million votes for Vice President Harris.36% of the country 's voting-eligible population didn't vote in this election. So. 89,278 948 didn't vote.
@@darlenedowie2926it doesn't matter you lost and you're going to keep losing😂😂😂
@@darlenedowie2926 just sharing my views.
Hahahaha, you sweet summer child…😅😊
Hopefully not.
You can't eliminate poverty in every form by 2030 if college graduates don't return home,if they don't want to help why should we?
Healing begins the moment you are willing to come to grips with the truth.
A good government protect immigrant
Legal immigrants, yes.
I hope he doesn’t.
Instead of talking how illegal immigrant should be allowed to be working, why don't you discuss how to give them an expedite or temporary stay in the country? Using illegal workers is immoral because they can be abused.
Well, they probably should have come legally or stayed at home.
Its was illegal anyway and unconstitutional
Abby can you get people around that table who don't have brain freeze.
Abby is the problem, she is a grade school teacher intellect.
@@bayridge2011 But she's kind of cute🙂
@@jezballs4018lol. Not at all
*Abby has her brain freeze too. She was good. Now she is a Joy Behar in the making.*
There aren't any trumptards there like Jennings,thank God every time that fool talked I felt my IQ drop
The order was expected to face legal hurdles as birthright citizenship is enshrined in the constitution. But it can be politically rewarding for trump. Irrespective of the US SC verdict the executive order has sent a signal and a message that america will now be less warm and less receptive to the idea of immigration and immigrants. Trump must heed the economic argument on immigration.
Molest means bother, harass, hassle, or annoy. Unwelcome or unwanted contact could be sexual, but not necessarily.
What’s with the cowboy hats. Ffs
The judge needs to read up on how the amendment was passed in the first place! The person who wrote the original language of the amendment said it did not confer citizenship on a baby born in the U.S. *of foreign parents who were 'subject to the jurisdiction' of their home country - not the United States!* That's why the language is in the amendment "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof..." This amendment was originally, specifically interpreted at the time to confer citizenship on former slaves!
By your logic, the babies of permanent residents and dual citizens should not get birthright citizenship? Trump does not exclude them - why is he inconsistent? Basically he is just picking and choosing who he thinks should get birthright citizenship as the amendment is clear that all babies born in the US and subject to the jurisdiction (nothing about parents) should get citizenship. The only exceptions are babies with diplomatic immunity, babies of invading armies, and babies born in Native American tribal lands which all have their own set of rules.
Also the amendment was meant to be non exclusionary- slaves were just one subset and the SC later clarified that it would apply to children born to foreign citizens as the children are still subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. (read the Wong Kim Ark case)
We have the same problem in Canada taking rooms away from citizens then leaving the country without paying the bill. Companies advertise this in Asian countries and charge big bucks to organise
Did that pink woman just talk about fairness? Asking a baby who had no choice on where they were born if it is fair they were born where they were born
We gotta learn to start speaking the way they do... By "blocking" the order, we really mean "embracing" the order, see. So, it's fine. Don't worry about it.
Daily reminder to all dems, this is day 5 of President Trump’s triumphant return to the presidency!
4. You dont count inauguration day. The poorly educated cant count.
Day 5 of the destruction of American democracy, and the creation of a fascist dictatorship.
These people are ridiculous they are celebrating the battle while the war isn't over lol
It just amazes me how stupid people truly are. It’s just mind blowing to me.
At least Scott isn’t on here making crazy excuses.
Please improve the lower thirds. If you don’t know who these panelists are, I can just have this conversation in my kitchen. Abby’s team needs to step it up for this Black woman. She’s a smooth moderator and journalist.
These supreme court judges were appointed by bipartisan vote.
Birthright citizenship was meant for the offspring of black slaves in the U.S., which was why the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868. It's wasn't meant to be abused by illegal immigrants and corrupt politicians, or for foreigners that weren't slaves in the U.S.. Every right black Americans fought and won was given more to other groups and not to black Americans of who theses hard fought gains were meant for.. Reparations is owed.
What's with all the cowboy hats?
Disrespectful…..
No Scott Jennings!! Hallelujah 😌
The issue the courts will end up having to decide is if this section of the Constitution, "and not subject to any foreign power", includes babies conceived in other countries to people who are subject to foreign powers. Keep in mind the original intention of the law as it relates to slavery and the fact slaves had been sold off from their original continent/homes and were no longer subject to any government other than the U.S.
I can very easily see the Supreme Court ruling in Trump's favor on this given the wording of the Constitution itself.
You mean, you can see SCROTUS *rewriting* the constitution *yet again* and tossing out over a century of precedent.
Take it to SCOTUS!
Why the black hats?
Because cnn thinks by him wearing that hat. he represents the southern democrats.
@@OfficialDripDrop good grief!
first :Better focus on changing laws of using weapons in this country and how many innocent children have died in this country.
Second :
Combating the import of fentanyl
Simply vile ! But unfortunately simply irresistible for those who hate others . Trump is their man . Stay safe .
Since this is what latinos voted for it's hard to know what to feel.
Stepping on the stone stepped on the wolf nothing left to step on✋🏻
What's up with the sudden rise of cowboy hats?
According to my DNA, even if they went back to the original constitution as a Spanish American, I would be cool forget the amended one let’s go to the original. The amended one was a nightmare.
Is this a cowboy hat convention now
Best week America has had in 208 weeks. Trump is awesome...
I agree. He awes me - and that is not a compliment.
Said every criminal ever
Democrat Pedophiles are scared Trump will deport their illegal entry children they have to sexually abuse...
Okay fascist.
@@keithosmond5730 Democrats Soy Boys who call people fascists should easliy move to Canada. It will be easy for them because everyone knows their boyfriends already packed their shit for them... 😂
Not on your life but if he does he will bury himself
NO!
Donald Trump is your daddy , America has spoken , start applying for new jobs😂😂😂😂😂
Yes Daddy.... What are you doing Daddy? Mmmmm Daddy....
1/5th of America chose him, do some math your feelings are not important to the math
Trump is Barron daddy that’s about it
So, just toss out the constitution? Heil Drumpf?
Looking for your Fourth Reich?
u need a hair transplant baldy
Of course not Trump will take it all the way and will win!!! We the people have spoken and have voted for this!!!
17m subs, and the best you got is like 4k in views. Talk about a dead ass channel. Cnn dying a slow death. 😂
Yet here you are daily helping. Doesnt matter if you dont listen. You clicked to cry
@@Rumpelstiltskin-s8e Bravo. Isnt this typical of those Trump supporters? Constantly whining. Like Trump. I swear, I have never heard a grown man bellyache and complain as much as that liar. They usually get their news from Fox news who has been sued for MILLIONS of dollars for lying. Yet, they swear they heard the gospel.
@@Rumpelstiltskin-s8ehis comments arent going to help cnn cnn is to far gone its just fum to watch tje crying liberials on cnn amd msnbc
His followers are losing their uneducated minds and I love it. The Appeals Court needs to stop hearing these cases that makes no sense. A waste of taxpayers money. That’s how you stop dumb cases going to the Supreme Court. You deny to hear their dumb cases.
****Anyone who respond to my comment will be talking to themselves. I never receive any notifications for comments so if you like talking to yourself, go right ahead.*****
Lightweight panel..................moving on.
He will not back down, and that's a good thing! This stupid law should have been scrapped decades ago!!
Wasted energy
Thank God for Trump!
Nope
What can we expect after America elected a self serving criminally indicted insurrectionist sexual harassing orange crook.
@@kisha1682 thank Satan for woke trash
Trump🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🕺🎶🕺🎶🕺🎶🕺
Don't you mean thank the devil for Trump
His followers are losing their uneducated minds and I love it.
****Anyone who respond to my comment will be talking to themselves. I never receive any notifications for comments so if you like talking to yourself, go right ahead.*****
No😂 he will not back down! 😅
2A is clearly written in the Constitution too but they cant have firearms either.
What happened to John Griffin? Didn’t he produce this network during that crazy year of 2020?
We can get the full context of the phrase that the founders inserted in the 14th amendment if we go to the Congressional Record of 1868. The phrase in question is….
… and subject to the jurisdiction thereof’
Dumb question. Have you not been paying attention.
Could it be written more plainly? I don't think so. Forget your feelings, read the document.
Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1 : *_All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside._*
2-4 months before delivering their baby! The travels to USA to deliver their baby to have us citizenship, they don’t live en USA
6:50 indeed. Four years of this. lol😅. That got me
Good idea. Constitutional convention. Keep mentioning that CNN, and see if it doesn't happen.
Poor democrats won’t win on birthrights either not in the long run 😂 you people need mental hospitals to get well
How is Trump doing on grocery prices? Cost of eggs? Ending the war in Ukraine? Anything?
College wasn't for you was it?
The constitution > executive order. The nations poorly educated dont understand politics let alone the constitution
Sorry this is DOA.
@@chancock4222
@@liamfinch4129gonna take some time fixing what yalls bozo Biden created lol. Good riddance to Weekend at Bernies
It’s the golden age!
I've never seen golden feces. Where does that come from?
It was a great amendment for its time and circumstances, but times have changed. America was founded by settlers. Immigrants came later..
My belief is that the amendment needs to be changed for now.
lets have this situation : two native-born american people travel abroad and unexpectedly childen is born outside USA teritory.
could that foreign‐born children (having native-born american parents) , could that children be president of USA ?
A couple fake cowboys up there😂😂
Are the cowboy hats multiplying? Is it some kind of inside joke we don't know about? I can't take these guys seriously when they're wearing these giant, comical hats. I hope I'm not the only one who sees the hats... because people are pretending like they're normal! 😂
Wow, Do People still take this propiganda network seriously.
No
Abby Philips is so irritating
The Constitution is a living document it can be amended. American citizenship comes with benefits. Everybody can't be a citizen. Maybe they should focus on what type of country we want for our children. We need jobs and schools that educate. All of this is a distraction.
Oh dear...first we had the Covid virus spreading, recently we've seen Avian Flu spreading. Your show suggests cowboy hats indoors is a virus spreading too! 😅
American people their lazy thing Trump's gonna make miracles for them.Good luck with that.Go to work and make money