Ep 6. The SECRET behind how they carved hard stone!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ส.ค. 2024
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @withouthistory
We accept CRYPTO donations, please use Etherium, Binance Smarch Chain, AVAX, SOL, Or MATIC
0xBc74449F2521BBe61E42F1e9a13aa09a8b769877
How Africans Invented Mathematics
• Ep 2. The SHOCKING tru...
The Largest civilization in history
• Ep 1. Historians are S...
The TRUE Cradle of civilization
• Ep 5. They LIED about ...
VIDEO CHAPTERS
0:00 Intro
2:20 Chapter 1: Mudbricks
6:10 Chapter 2: Concrete and geopolymer
10:45 Chapter 3: Stone carvings
14:35 Chapter 4: Complex form reproduction
16:45 Chapter 5: Obelisk
24:30 Chapter 6: Stone Drilling
28:40 Chapter 7: Bonus
#withouthistory #uncharted #metatronscube
Sources
www.ancient-origins.net/ancie...
qualitygraniteandmarble.com/w...
www.Wikipedia.org
www.astenb.com/2019/07/africa...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_I...
• 3d ancient egypt
• 026 Senusret I Sunruset Pyramid
• Virtual Egypt: The Big... Karnak virtual tour
• 029 Senusret III Dashur Senruset iii pyramid
Hi Noble ones! If you find this informative. Please SHARE. Love ❤️ you all regardless of your melanin concentration.
Awsome information and excellent presentation 👏, this is the type of historical story telling that keeps me glued with wide eye enthusiasm.
Noble ones is what the word Aryan translates to. Are you implying you or that your audience is Aryan. Well I am, well my ancestors was anyhow so there maybe some others watching this I guess. But looking at your choice of people to represent Egyptians I doubt it somehow.
Very interesting video. I like how you explained the lime stone outer layer of the great pyramid
I think the drilling has been worked out. I wonder why so many people go on about how power tool are needed?
I've been cutting granite for 40 year's,mud & straw bricks was a dry joke
Not to diminish the advanced technology, skill, and brilliant minds of the people who lived during these times, but there are far too many unanswered questions to claim totally resolved, especially due to the massive scale and precision of these endeavors.
Not to mention, the civilization in (Hittites')Gobekli Tepe .
"Not to diminish the advanced technology, skill, and brilliant minds of the people who lived during these times......."
Proceeds to immediately diminish them 😑
@@manueldumont3709
Gobkeli Tepe was abandoned and buried by erosion literally MILLENNIA before the Hittite civilisation was founded.
The Hittite ancestors were not local to Anatolia, but moved there about 3.5-4 thousand years after Gobekli Tepe was abandoned.
That's literally more time than the ENTIRE dynastic Egyptian civilisation existed for.
Also Turkey is the name given to Anatolia in the early 20th century - named for the Turkic peoples that invaded the area during the middle ages with the Islamic caliphates.
That name has ZERO meaning to the ancient history of Anatolia which long preceded the presence of Turkic peoples.
We were clickbaited by a 30 minute video :(
@@captaindein33 agreed
My first job was as a trainee sculptor in London and I can accept the limestone concrete theory... but carving Amenhotep III's statue and a multitude like it in various granite stones... or the granite boxes at the Serapeum of Saqqara with dolerite hammers and a copper chisels? Hilarious!
Agreed. I was thinking along the exact same lines. Hilarious. Not going to happen... then you take into account the sheer amount of items, the size and breadth of structures -well, I'm gonna say it's still a mystery.
They don't want to admit that ancient man had ancient rudimentary versions if modern machinery... thanks to the "Annunaki"
@@daffydlandegge3843 May i ask why you say "thanks to Annunaki?"
It was easy for whoever made all this. Not only was it easy, they were showing off just a tad.
@spadesmaster2153 every ancient peoples states this as fact (in the form of literature).
Emerald Tablets of Thoth
Cuneiform tablets of Sumeria
Enuma Elish
Mahabarhata
The internet has more uses than just watching memes, animal videos and "fails" or girls looking stupid doing those Tik Tok dances
The oldest construction has the highest level of craftsmanship. Those extremely old vases were built to a fine level that we are just now advanced enough to measure. Just because some race claims possession of a land, doesn't mean that they built it.
People who think that there was an ancient civilisation with futuristic technology making fairly simplistic but labour intensive megalithic architecture and art are just stupid racists or people who are a bit mental.
When you have a stone carving tradition that is thousand of years old you start to get really really good at it.
Racism is obvious.
Guessing that kicks out the white man theory, using your logic.
Then the pyramids built in Guatemala were not built by Guatemalans? Or built by the Mayan race? Same big block construction. We know that the Aztecs did not do it, as they were always on the warpath. They took over Maya cities and called it home. So Paris, France was not built by Frenchmen? Etc. Greeks did not build the Parthenon, they did not build Rome when most of the population was Greeks? Romans were busy fighting others. Every Roman was in the military.
@bunzeebear2973
If you put a little effort into it, you can see what happened. Dead humans, obviously left all of their cities and possessions behind. We now have hard dates where humans were reduced to only a few thousand. 2.6 and 0.9 million years ago. Once at the beginning of the Ice Ages and once almost in the middle during one of the coldest parts.
So how did they get perfect bilateral and three-dimensional symmetry on really complex statues like Khufu? How doe these techniques explain the really fine details which are perfectly symmetrical?
the stone working, sure... but what about their unexplainable accuracy?
Not that I doubt they couldn't do it... but just exactly HOW did they do it?
I still think there are massive gaps in understanding exactly how they did it, and there are likely techniques and skills that are not part of the 'known techniques' mentioned.
And while its not aliens, thats still an unknown advanced technology ... doesnt have to be friggen lazers, but they definitely knew shit then, that we dont know how to do now.
It's not perfect though.
Very good yes, but not perfect.
The continuous drumbeat of 'perfection' and 'impossible precision' in relation to these ancient sites and artefacts comes from people like Graham Hancock, Randall Carlson, and TH-cam channels like Brien Foerster, Bright Insight and UnchartedX who are just trying to sell you on that to keep you buying from them (or funding their lifestyle with ad clicks) rather than actually pushing forward the science.
It's closer to cult/religion than archaeology, in fact the way that they speak about archaeologists is very reminiscent of the way Scientologists speak about psychologists to keep their believers from realising that they are being brainwashed.
Ask yourself this question, how would you start the manifestation of a Pyramid into physical manifestation, if you get an answer to this question that I proposed then you will understand how the pyramids were made . I know it sounds esoteric , but I say it this way so you can (THINK) about it , I gave you the answer , now let's see if you can ( ) about it , and please do not allow your ego to take an offense , because in truth it just does not know !!
@mnomadvfx while not "perfect" the level of perfection is indeed impossible with the current "official" explanations by archeologists and historians.
It's obviously not an "impossible level of perfection" because it exists. No one is actually claiming that as you suggest.
It shouldn't have to be explained that the "impossible level of perfection" only applies to our current acidemically accepted model.
Seeing as such a simple concept went so far over your head without any notice (by you) I'm not sure your judgement is at a level that should be trusted to assess what is and isn't "brainwashing."
That is a very serious claim and you failed to keep the basic claims accurate.
In fact... the lack of application of basic thought that derives your statement seems to suggest you have far more experience with brainwashing that you realize.
As you take a very hardline stance that is basically liable (written slander) while not even getting the basics concepts correct.
Meaning you don't even have the basic knowledge needed to make such a claim... so it's not an original thought of your own but instead a repeat of someone else. Also you have a religious level of faith in that claim as you take such a hard stance and again... don't even understand the basics on the topic of your claim.
Believing what you are told (but don't understand on your own) to such a level that you would basically attack those that speak otherwise is the result of brainwashing.
That is not a result of free thinking on your own.
How did they work in those dark excavations with out leaving evidence of flames?
"but they definitely knew shit then, that we dont know how to do now." That is not hard to fathom. Our grandparents knew things and skills and crafts that is lost on todays youth. There are tons of skills that are dying currently. So definitely not hard to think of what all was lost from ancient times.
Unfortunately measuring the ago of stone is not possible so these dates are just predictions based on biological material left in or around the sites in question. Those stone pots in the in kemet still found today in museums had walls that where so thin it's blows people's minds. Also the stones used in the pyramids construction are natural solid stone from bedrock and many locations show stone still left in bedrock but they did use geopolymer to fill the games in the outer limestone but not in the inside granite chambers and pathways. Plus you can still see unfinished stonework outside the pyramids with huge saw cuts and tub drill holes just sitting there as if people wouldn't notice. My issue is how people will still believe in nonsense like they where buriel chambers for pharaohs 🤦🏾♂️.
Please watch the laser scanning they did on those on the uncharted channel.
Your opening statement was/is still so unbelievably absurd that I damn nearly broke my neck from shaking my head so freakin' hard! I mean, you've heard of radiometric dating before, right? I'd bet you have because it's not really a new technology or anything given its advent in 1905!!! Anywho, there are a few other methods for dating the age of stone, albeit less accurate.
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric_dating)
@@0neToWatch OK so will that be able to date the age of the stone to when it was cut and placed? Because clearly that's the actual point not how old the stone is itself. We wouldn't need to date the age of stone as it would be extremely old as we know granite would take a long time to form naturally. Clearly you miss understood the point that is being made and went on about technology that doesn't actually solve the problem at hand 🤦🏾♂️.
You can date organic matter in the mortar. There are many clues that tell us Egyptian people built the pyramids.
@@WayneBraack I said you can only measure the organic matter and the egyptologists won't admit that they had mortar. Also I never said Egyptian didn't build them I just said the age of stone can't be measured and determine what age period of Egyptians built them.
I am all for K.I.S.S. being the most likely scenario for the construction methods. I think the thing that puzzles me the most is the moving and lifting of some of the largest stones weighing in at 80+ tons or more to the heights that they were as not all of the stones are geopolymers.
Does not show the level of perfection of some of the carved bowls that are carved perfectly round to a few thousands of an inch with handles, that would not be able to be achieved in your way shown. Also 1000 plus tonne stones shipped 500kms away that are also perfectly shaped, and many, many more statues heads, all geometrically perfectly made to CNC machine type quality.
Their work only demonstrates that rudimentary methods could be utilized to reproduce, by copying, these artifacts, given a tremendous amount of time.
It is a bit like arguing we could build sky scrapers without motorized construction equipment. Given dozens of years, it would be possible. Yet, the quantity of sky scrapers, as the quantity of Egyptian artifacts, strongly suggests they were not taking 6 months to make a small vase with laser cutter accuracy.
No, the machine like precision would not be, we need to know how they can cut granite to mm thickness without breaking with copper chisels and sand for smoothing @@thekey429
When you lie about one thing the rest isn't true
Them folks just don’t want to admit that romans didn’t invent concrete
Apparently the Ancient Egyptians had it as well!
What "folks" Historians.
Music video is pretty good 🤙🏼💯
Syria and Jordan were the first to use it 6500BC? I’m sure something will be found to push that back even further.
Hahaha. Simple facts.
What a huge assumption in reasoning is this video. I give it a 10 Pinocchio's !
As soon as they couldn't pretend that Egyptians were white they want to attribute the Great African Civilization to Aliens. 😂😅😅 Just pathetic.
They’re Incapable of comprehending truth
@AkhetofHeruHERE’S to black men, my heroes 🌟🌟🌟🍾🍸!!!
We are the aliens 👽 😎
The Nubians were a distinct ethnic group with an entirely different culture and language. While they were part of the greater Egyptian empire and even ruled as pharaoh at one point, it doesn't make proper Khemetians a Sub-Saharan African people. Just as they aren't Greek because of the Ptolemaic dynasty that resulted from Alexander's conquest.
The black / white dichotomy of American socio-politics has no place in serious academic discussion because it is inadequate to deal with the complexity of ethnicity. Over-generalized classifications based on color or continents is nothing more than intellectual laziness. "Asian" doesn't really tell us anything, as Indians and the Chinese are clearly not the same. Not to mention we could technically place Russia in this category as well.
In reality, there are 56 officially recognized ethnic groups in China. Tribal lines in Africa are no different. Even if Nubians and Egyptians were the same, they are different from the Bantu West African tribes from which black Americans are descended. Any way you look at it - they're not your people. However, we don't have to speculate on the Egyptians. We have the mummies, therefore we have the DNA.
www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-tutankhamun-dna/half-of-european-men-share-king-tuts-dna-idUSTRE7704PB20110801
www.nature.com/articles/546017a
It is what it is.
@@Shin_Lona First off your making a huge mistake by stating Egyptians and Nubians since antiquity were not the same.. I’m sorry my friend archaeologists and genetic studies do not support you as you supposed… There are many studies proving the religion, husbandry, agriculture, pottery, temple complexes and much more were very similar… As I’ve mentioned earlier there are proven genetical linkage between the two regions since the earliest cultures.
Second I disagree with your assertion that West Africans having nothing to do with the regions when there has been genetic discoveries of mtDNA L and Y-DNA E1b1a present in the Nile valley which we know comes from West Africa and probably got there during the time of the green Sahara period. Not only that we also have anthropological evidence to farther reinforce my claims. This ascertain knowledge should not be ignored in anyway…
Thirdly though king Tut was indeed R1b let’s not forget that the same Y-DNA is found heavily in Central Africa too, ironically the Amarna family has the closes affinity with Africans below the Sahara along with Ramses III’s harem. This discovery was unraveled using their STR data provided by Zahi Hawass which gives us a more accurate assessment of the mummies deep ancestry than maternal or paternal DNA ever could.
Fourthly the 2017 Abusir el-Meleq study did not cover the entire history of ancient Egypt from the oldest dynasty or thee early New Kingdom dynasty, they didn’t even bother abstracting DNA from remain in the south of Egypt which we know sprouted the culture. It was even admitted in the study itself which ironically states…
*However, we note that all our genetic data were obtained from a single site in Middle Egypt and may not be representative for all of ancient Egypt. It is possible that populations in the south of Egypt were more closely related to those of Nubia and had a higher sub-Saharan genetic component, in which case the argument for an influx of sub-Saharan ancestries after the Roman Period might only be partially valid and have to be nuanced. Throughout Pharaonic history there was intense interaction between Egypt and Nubia, ranging from trade to conquest and colonialism, and there is compelling evidence for ethnic complexity within households with Egyptian men marrying Nubian women and vice versa51,52,53. Clearly, more genetic studies on ancient human remains from southern Egypt and Sudan are needed before apodictic statements can be made.”*
My overall point is let’s not make definitive statements about the population history of Egypt when there hasn’t been enough DNA research on many other historical nomes in and around the areas of the country. The researchers don’t even bother studying their southern neighbors which would absolutely provide more in-depth information about the history of the Nile valley civilizations… When things remain mysterious and unknown it only births bias assertions.
While these techniques might have worked for the limestone blocks, they would not have worked for the "sarcophagus" found in the king's chamber, the accuracy of stone placement inside the pyramid, or the Ramesses statues, as they don't account for the perfect leveling and edging, the circular saw marks or the overcuts (mistakes) we find.
The vases are particularly problematic, because we know with 100% certainty after doing a 3d scan of the objects and measuring their symmetry and consistency that they could not be done by hand. I can link you to the study if you'd like. The same would have to be done for the tube drill cores. But engineers now looking at them believe it would not have been possible by hand either.
Similar to the sphinx, it is far more likely that many of these objects were built before the dynastic Egyptians were around, closer to 9000-12000 years ago or more. Our current dating methods use the hieroglyphs found on the objects to arrive at a conclusion, but this is problematic because the level of the sophistication between the items themselves and the hieroglyphs simply don't add up and do not have anything close to the same level of finish. It was also common for Pharaohs to put their names on items that they did not build, and many texts speak about how they inherited their civilization from an older more advanced one.
There's so much that could be said, including how they even would have moved 2000 ton stone blocks, or the scoop marks found in hard stone, but I highly recommend looking at the work of Christopher Dunn (a leading engineer on the matter of ancient Egypt and author of "The Giza Powerplant") and UnchartedX (who's channel you can find on TH-cam). They provide a lot of evidence and many testimonies from other engineers as well that point to a much higher level of advancement that what is commonly thought. I would say their approach is also highly scientific, so no ancient aliens nonsense.
The evidence pointing to an older dating for many of these works is actually a good thing for those trying to prove the "African-ness" of the builders, as the farther you go back in time, the "darker" the region probably becomes. But this, to me, is of secondary importance (despite my being from Africa)
Up South
Trying to pass the accepted narrative falls flat. They may have understood cement but the harder stone and precision required make his arguments fall flat.
People do not fully comprehend how heavy and how hard granite and diorite is. Pounding an obelisk with a stone ball is hilarious. They really don’t think we believe that this is how they did it right?
@@pennydink72We’re Abrahm went?
@@forrestwhichard2862 ...its been proven by sevral ppl, using copper shisels and a wooden/stone hammer...(wich was available at the time) its perfectly feasible make perfect corners in just a few hours ...
you are missing something , it is wrong to say we can recreate today the stone vase , marble breccia is no more than 4 on mohs scale, the granite vases and porphyry cannot be shape perfectly by hands please refer to uncharted x video on precision , also all granite blocks cannot be made by hands
No one should ever refer to uncharted x nonsense
@@chiznowtchits not nonsense. UnchartedX doesn’t pretend to know how the observed level of precision was achieved, unlike this channel which keeps repeating how easy it all was without hardly any explanation of how..
@simontillson482 oh yes he does. He claims it's done via advanced technology provided by a high tech civilization
The only thing that never adds up is apparently the ancient Egyptians didn’t have the tools to quarry the granite yet build Egyptians pyramids, labyrinths, and libraries, etc… perfectly aligned to the Orin Star constellations, exactly on the 30th parallel.
Also 7 geologist state in their studies that the sphinx has thousands of years of rain and water weathering which would date the building of sphinx and great pyramids to 11,500 years ago not 4,500 which the only tools found were copper and dolerite rocks 🪨
The inner layers of the Great Pyramid were built on a pre-existing hillock. The stones were rough quarried and unfitted. Only the outer layers were dressed stone, and even they were coarse enough to require mortar. Composite construction would be labor prohibitive. Pounding that much limestone into powder would have been much more work than just splitting blocks in a quarry.
The inside of the great pyramid is made out of huge granite slabs smoothend and perfectly fitted.. the weight and hardness compared to limestone is waay harder to work with..
The one flaw in the polymer theory is the lack of bonding between the layers and individual blocks
Exactly - they would be far more uniform than we see if it were all geopolymer.
This method was used in acient South America though. Proven by finding trapped organic material in the blocks that were of volcanic orgin. If they were cut blocks the organic material would have been burnt away when the rock formed.
Meaning they had to form the blocks to have the organic material trapped as such.
However this is a very recent discovery. The blocks were long thought to be actual cut blocks even by geologists.
@@jacobnash9755 not necessarily. I've personally seen organic matter trapped in lava flows that weren't burned away.
Obviously this video is propaganda for weak minds.
6:05... why is the dialogue seemingly separating Kemet from Africa when it is all one and the same continent? Saying "Africans" moved northward into Kemet is like saying "Americans" moved northward into New York... they were/are all "Africans". Okay, I see near the end the statement is made that the "Africans of Kemet" achieved these awesome feats. Very good documentary, thank you for sharing!
You no they dont have a clue, ancient times . North kemet was in fact south sudan and south was north.
This technique does not explain how the kailash temple was carved from a mountaintop down.
? as far i know this is about ancient Egytian stone cutting...not ancient Asian stone cutting... and kailash temple and Ellora cave sytem is belived to have been constructed 600 - 1000 BCE (2400 to 3000 years ago) in a time when all kinds of different metal alloys existed, ...
...but still... the Ellora caves are truly amazing... thay must have been truly beutiful once (before all the pollution and discolouring)
This video also explains why almost every tomb were often looted as soon as it was sealed up. Treasures had to be hidden in secret to prevent the looting epidemic.
Priests, can you really trust them?
To be sure, it's a great start.... but basalt will take much more than a cutting agent, much less the huge structures in rose granite, the hardest of all granites
The symmetry found and the .003 flat surface(smoother than glass ) modern tools this scale would have difficult almost incalculable cost. Let alone 1 mistake loss of symmetry
The more of these that I watch, I become convinced Western Africa in the fertile, lush Sahara, 5-6,000 years ago, where lakes and rivers were everywhere, was the true location of Atlantis. This explains how Egypt (Khmet) had inherited the precision technology and how Haitians were also African. What wiped out all the history must have been pretty apocalyptic.
They found Atlantis in Africa it's located in the eye of the Sahara but they won't talk about that😊
@@davidshareefChTPhD hi, yes I know and so much points to this. Archeologists need evidence unfortunately, so need to discount it until they find something definitive - which they won't, because Mauritania won't let prospectors in (too much gold to be mined) and archeologists could be under false pretences - not to mention that where it is located is so remote that you can dehydrate and/or starve out there. It has also been stripped of any ancient feature, I believe because of many (one super-huge) tsunamis stripping it clean. People get confused between the island, the city and the whole kingdom. This could be the city.
You are not far off at all
And why they renamed Ethiopic Ocean as Atlantic Ocean. The remnant of the bloodline are still there in West Africa. They moved "ancient Ethiopia" identity to the east to fit the new narrative they invented for the middle-east area. However, they don't expect people to easily figure if those with Atlantis bloodline still exist today.
@@withoutHistory I've done some good research 😉. If you have read Plato you have done well. That Cleito had 5 sets of twins? Where in the world is the highest incidence of twins? Right on the western border of Nigeria - RIGHT NEXT TO THE EYE OF AFRICA.! Where Poseidon made her his city (which was in her homeland).
The Egyptian vases are made so thin you can see light through them.
They must have been idiots. Why spend all that time making a vase so thin that you couldn't even use it when it was finished.
@@ratdad48 why do you assume they didnt use them.
I don't know why they made them, but they're there for all to see.
Translucent materials, genius
Just like construction workers today, they took their tools with them when a project was finished. To think that they would leave their tools at the job site so it could be figured out how it was done when they were finished, sounds stupid. 😈
Hmmmmm but all sorts of tools were found. No power tools though. No batteries. No molds to pour muh geopolymers into. Etc and so on.
This video amazing great job 🔥🔥🔥
🙏🏽🙏🏽thanks so much Teroj. Do check out our other videos
Great presentation on how many of the ancient Egyptian structures and antiquities were most likely created starting with the pre Dynastic Eras up through the Dynastic Periods. Glad it was noted the various objects and structures predated Mesopotamia.
But Not(+-12 000 YR old)
@AkhetofHeru+-3500 yr old mummies(from Kemet) had indoEuropean DNA .
@AkhetofHeru lmAssOff @theDESPERATEsubSaharanAfricans(sitting onTheirArses in the Jungles of Africa...Then Trying to STEAL the(OutOfAfrica(ns'))
@AkhetofHeru Too bad(as with Ra🌞Moon🌛 CATH(SATH😈an...aka aKHET=SETH)olic
More closer to Sumeria (the guys who built the ziggurats) as they left behind an early writing system that got fired to become ceramic, so it lasts virtually forever. No proof of an earlier civilization exists by their writing.
Incredible discovery of ancient techniques, priceless and spellbinding. I wonder what the discovery of south Indian techniques would be truly unbeliever and stupendous. The techniques employed by the Maya and Aztecs would be out of this world.
Truly explains very little. Techniques that we aren't aware of. Great explanation.
Clever explanation of somethings.
What about the other megalithic structures found around the world? -The multiple underground cities carved from stone in Turkey.
Were they all commissioned by the rich? Did they all have specialized economies? How did they all move and carve those giant stones with precision? Were they in contact with each other to share the knowledge?
The Olmecs of Mexico come to mind. A civilization older than the Aztecs.
I know of that stone in Turkey. It is not hard at all so easily carved out with bronze or other stone tools.
Your video has not solved the problem of precision.
That vase replica looks hilarious when compared with the original vases. They are massive levels of precision apart. The original vases have been laser scanned and show a level of precision and symmetry that isnt possible with hand tools.
100+ ton granite boxes with surfaces that have been laser scanned and confirmed to be as flat as glass?
400+ ton statues that are flawlessly symetrical?
Dont get me wrong, there is so much skill and craftsmanship in many of ancient Egypts structures and artifacts. Some truly beautiful pieces of work.
But the movement is growing very rapidly of people who strongly believe that the reason that all of the most magnificent things are from the predynastic era, is due to inheritance.
Growing despite no evidence of a lost high tech civilization being found. Strange.
I've learned so much about our history that I didn't learn in school. Thank you for these lessons
Some very interesting stuff in your video. It obviously can't explain everything, but what you did show was fascinating.... thanks.
It is only with an open mind that we can move forward on any mystery. And I truly appreciate when I hear from a mind that is willing to reconsider.
I think it's common sense that no we haven't "found" advanced machinery and tools. But, from the Pyramids, to the Serapeum, to the stone vases we see the results of that tooling and machinery. As the accuracy, and level of sophistication, and accuracy of construction could not have been done completely by human effort only. We just are not that good unless we have the aid of tools.
Or a lot of time on our hands and wasn't gonna get paid for it anyway. No TV to waste time watching and I can only watch GOATS for so long(goat is the main animal, not sheep) and it was burros there not camels. Camels are native to Syria so way back there was a time there was no camels and in fact that the Sahara was the bottom of a sea for way down south is whale bones still sticking out of the sand (meaning there was big fish there.) and maybe an earth movement and those whales got trapped in puddles that dried up in the sun and they died. Long before man came. Bones are still there, no one cares.
If you see "results of that tooling and machinery" you should visit an ophthalmologist.
Your explanation for carving the obelisk doesn't account for the tool marks left on the stone. The thought of pounding a diorite ball to do the job is totally absurd!
Spinning the vase around then showing the vase with two carved handles is just total nonsense.
As an engineer those vases would be difficult to replicate today.
And they found 30000 of them too
That hand drill is truly astonishing in its own right👌
I can eassily buy the concrete/geopolymer explanation, it actually makes sense. Maybe - maybe also the obelisk and to a lesser extent the drill holes stories. But to take material that is 2-3 points softer on the Mohs scale than the materials originally used (granite and dolerite), crudely reproduce in 4 months work one of the simpler forms of the thousands upon thousands surviving finely made, perfectly symmetrical, highly polished predynastic objects, still add mysterious "optimized processes" for increased efficiancy is quite a bit of a stretch. Using this as explanation on how these objects and much more complex and delicate things like the shist disk were produced ("totally explained") is downright ridiculous.
Hi, people seemed to have rock shaping skills in many places. There is a one metre dolorite cube near where I live that was shaped to provide a (unmoveable) marker for an observation stance to observe signals from a lookout 3.5 km distant. This would date from the Picts in the Scottish Iron age and may be around 200AD. See my article "Messages from the past: Iron Age signalling in Argyll". An informative and good video. Thanks.
The statues with long arms and legs are so intriguing also
Mark Qvist`s article (and the conclusions in it) disavow any idea that the vase on unchartedx`s channel was made by simple craftsmen with handtools.
Quote. '' There is no way, in which we can attribute the production of this artefact, to anyone who do not possess, at minimum, the level of technological sophistication and capabilities mentioned above."
The article is linked on a post entitled "Was a COMPUTER Used to Design this Artifact?" dated three months ago from now (Sept 1st 23)
There is an important detail that contradicts the hypothesis of the use of geopolymers. The building blocks of the pyramid are not homogeneous in size, as they would be if they were made in molds. They have different sizes.
They could have been portable 2 sided forms so that the stones could be poured in place.
This doesn't explain anything, there are stones in several different formats, and the quarry where the stones originated is there with the cuts for anyone who wants to see it.@@timothyappleseed2986
@timothyappleseed2986 any evidence? Any shred of evidence for this? Like maybe a written accounting? A drawing of the process by the builders? Some mold artifacts found? No, of course not.
Also if they were 2 sided, poured against each other, they wouldn't be distinct blocks, which is what we can clearly see
@@timothyappleseed2986 its a stupid theory. Logistically doesn't make sense/ One would have to first powderize 6 million tons of limestone then put it back together.
Thank you for your time and your works. It is very much appreciated. Be blessed🙌🙏
How do you carve out those huge statues, those definite and precise carvings
I appreciate your videos Bro
I think that the one factor that gets in the way of believing artisans could make the amazing objects of ancient times is time itself. People didn't think in terms of time/efficiency. They had nothing but time. And Egypt lasted for THOUSANDS of years. You can get a lot done in that time with unlimited manpower, wealth, resources, etc.
Good point. Let’s not also forget that the pharaohs wanted their pieces completed at least before they died.
It's certainly not impossible that one or even several of the Giza pyramids were multi phase constructions only started in the reign of the pharaohs most closesly associated with them.
The Meidum pyramid has clear evidence of no less than 3 construction phases - believed to all be the work of Khufu's father Sneferu which seems remarkably unlikely considering he is also credited with the Bent and Red pyramid constructions.
It seems highly likely that Sneferu's father Huni (last pharaoh of 3rd dynasty) began the phase of pyramid building starting with Meidum that is associated with the 4th dynasty - and Sneferu merely carried on where his father left off.
Also something to bear in mind - no ones wealth is 'unlimited'.
Wealth in the Nile valley would have meant 2 things mainly.
#1. Water from the Nile.
#2. Food from the harvest and various livestock sources.
The pharaoh would have had a giant share of each harvest - therein was his TRUE wealth, and without which their various construction projects would have been impossible, as a starving worker can do no work, basic fundamental facts.
Take all the time in the world, it won't help produce the flat surfaces and sharp corners we see, especially with inside corners, it simply can't be done with pounding stones.
Hey without History, thanks for your content. Any chance you can provide shorts African victories or Europeans, and or shorts of some bad ass warrior quotes. I hear them when they speak of sparta, I figured we have some too, if you have not already. I am a patron also. Thanks
Will do a special on that JH.
🙏🏽🙏🏽
In his meeting with Saudi head of state after they had signed deals, president Ruto assured us that, "soon, nearly one million Kenyans would be finding work in Saudi A😊rabia". These people don't want Africans, they want Africa!
Incredible! Great channel
This is the most honest documentary I’ve watched thank you for this presentation .
Thanks Serge!!
enjoyed your video .. thanks ✌
I could show you some amazingly carved and drilled neolithic stone axes made of diorites and other hard stones. The shaft-holes are perfect and this is precopper. Humans are just brill.
Yes. Sure. They were geniuses once and quickly degenerated into poor-quality building and pottery. Apparently, geniuses became rare. And their technology vanished, to be replaced by copper chisels and diorite hammers. That's why the ancient Egyptians could not have carved the earliest artefacts. They inherited them from an earlier civilisation.
They didn't degenerate. It's been an upward technological curve. Think of the Greeks, the Romans, the great medieval cathedrals.@@stephenphillips4984
@@stephenphillips4984Yes. Sure, the Atlanteans walked out of Ocean carrying fkng table saws and 35 feet circular saws, powered by Baghdad Batteries. Then with all that amazing tech, they just built vases and shit. Then, even more amazingly, a global catastrophe hit, killing them and wiping away any shred of evidence of their existence! How convenient. Yes sure, indeed.
THOTH is the key
Wisdom
Everything is Energy Everything runs on Frequency and Vibration
Thoth
You mean Tehuti/Djedhudi?
That Greek stuff is the problem
Everything is energy Everything? What In hell does that mean?
Scale and precision aside you kind of made some points. Unfortunately, the biggest questions are related to scale and precision.
Don't forget that pharaohs commissioned their monuments when they gained the throne so there were years of project time
Correct.
I wonder where we would as African people if our civilizations were uninterrupted 🤔 💭.
Not commenting in the interwebs.
There is only one problem with the stone theory and that is that organic material has been found in every single one of those stone vases as well as the megalithic rocks that was used to build the pyramids. This proves 100% that the rocks where not carved from natural stone but rather manufactured from some type of polymer. Even the Dolorite was found to contain organic material that just doesn't happen in natural rock. They clearly had knowledge that we don't have today and is extremely difficult to reverse engineer. In addition these vases found in Egypt are withing 1/1000 of an inch tolerance, an accuracy that we can replicate only with extreme difficulty even today!
You do understand that limestone is organic material! You know what falls to the sea bed! And most of the stone was cut from the bedrock that the thing sets on!😊
@@AnswermanAnswerman Organic material does not occur in Dolorite and other granite's which some of these stones and vases are made of. Limestone contains mostly fossilized shells (calcium carbonate) however to understand how natural rock is formed you need to look at the micritic material between the shells and for that you need an electron microscope. I would highly recommend looking into the work of professor Joseph Davidovits who has written several papers on the subject and proven without a doubt that the stones are not naturally occurring. There are several videos on you tube where Jospeh goes into scientific detail.
@@zaneaussie the biggest problem with the polymer idea is why did they have different sized blocks, why are blocks obviously damaged when used. Why are other blocks obviously cut with tube drills when they could have just kept the center devoid of material? It does not add up.
@@CrazyRFGuy The different sized blocks is not so hard to understand as the blocks at the bottom are much much larger than the ones at the top, so it has a decreasing block size as it rises up to the apex. Here is the kicker though and you are right, a lot of this makes no sense whatsoever. Even though these are polymer stones or an advanced type of concrete that is virtually indistinguishable from natural stone, they were not cast in place and still transported there from ages away. Why cast the stones and transport them if you can just cast them in place? Also, yes there are many examples of machining on many of the stones and structures. There certainly is a lot of things that don't add up at all...Maybe they needed to install wiring lol 😛
You misunderstand what I asked. Why did they even /have/ separate stones. The physical layout does not add up for any kind of poured material. Look at the grand gallery. You would not pour big blocks with a few inches over hang. You would pour entire rows at one time. No over hang, you would slope the walls top to bottom, and they knew how to do that look at the pyramid itself. I know how precise the bowls are, and thin. I know how to work metal to that tolerance and it is not easy. To pour a bowl that precise is not possible today and the evidence for machining is evident by their precision. Or do you think they were some how ultra skilled and could feel the distance your skin moves from your heart beat? That is how tight the distances are.
I was already entertaining the limestone concrete theory, and when I started your video I was actually pretty skeptical until you revealed a similar belief and explanation. I understand the traditionalists want to align their details to fit the popular narrative, but that doesn't make the transport/ramp theory any more viable or likely. When you speak to people that don't know a lot about the pyramids, they are typically pretty open to the concrete theory bc instinctually, the current popular method simply doesn't feel intelligent, and the African Egyptians were extremely that.
“ if I repeat Africans often enough…”
I know exactly how ancient ppl built just about everything, but during my journey of discovery I would share what I learned online thinking I could get support, nope , I discovered how Roman concrete worked, bc I was a guy that worked construction. Figured out how they made symmetrical statues, with lava, resonating frequencies with rocks, flying drones that terraform the desert, I am limited bc I need to ask help to start but we are surrounded by vultures that want fame without doing any work, they are taking directly out of all civilians mouths, bc the ideas puts everyone at a great advantage, great job opportunity/ biz op, I have ancient knowledge ppl struggle whole life trying to figure out, class a die repair / maker ,, and they have ppl make videos bc they are good at fancy videos they get the credit… we no longer need to depend on their system of oppression.. everyone can have honor again
You should write this s**t down - you'd make a fortune on the fiction bestseller lists.
@@mnomadvfx one thing I’ve learned out of my years of trying to start small biz or share what I learned..it only helps vulture’s.Americans don’t control cyberspace that’s y they change laws/ definitions to match what they want to do. Id rather save the info for ppl who can just walk into desert and never have to come back. Greed basically re runs history.. only if the ppl using stingrays wasn’t so greedy
I watch a lot of ancient documentaries and you have been one of the best ones props.
What if stamps were imbedded in the side wallls of the composite limestone frames and the carvings were mostly framed too. Could they have made the marble is what I wonder.
Amazing work! 👍
The secret is that “free energy” was what powered the old world and the ancients knew stuff long since deleted from the “history” books ✌️
Thank you..straight up bars of truths.
It is good to see content such as this. It allows us to take a look at what it offered up and decide for ourselves whether it has merit, is nonsense, is feasible OR>:? and therein lies the truth; OR ??? At least we NOW have that option and NOT the ones shoved down our throats or shoved in front of our eyes from those who attempted to manipulate history, who in essence were guilty of more fiction and misinformation let alone manipulation of the truth however limited that was; in conning us into their ideologies, perceptions, assumptions. We can only see as one might say the past through a cloudy semi opaque glass that leaves us no further closer to knowing what WAS, IS; without accepting that most of us in OUR lifetime will NEVER have the inconclusive, indisputable answers we seek. The 'ancient ones' existed. Something came along and they vanished. What they left in their 'wake' ? We will NEVER have the answers to WHO they were, where they originated and so much more. BUT.. one thing remains above all others, they WERE part of Earth's historical timeline; and part of OUR history.
Geopolymer, is a good explanation of how things got built.
Although, not everything 'geopolymer,' was powdered limestone. But if geopolymer is indeed how at least some things were made, then it is just as important to agree, that geopolymer construction was a known technique, on a global scale.
It has been thought that many of the 'cyclopean walls,' found all over Earth, were constructed in the same manner.
And it was also thought that the "nubs," found on many of these stone constructions, were in fact, the place where the geopolymer was poured into a mold, and then left to cure.
Some think that the geopolymer material is put 'wet,' into a bag, or sack, set into place and then shaped by jand, during the curing process. No mortor was ever used in any of the cyclopean constructions. But there are numerous examples of 'molten metal, clamps,' poured into special slots, which would have helped stabilized the over all construction.
As for the "Cradle of Civilization," Mesopotamia is the ONLY place that has both the Euphrates and the Tigres, rivers.
Neither of which are in Africa, as we know it today.
These rivers are mentioned in many ancient writings.
Ofcourse, the world has undergone changes through the eons of time.
Today, are we concerned about, where civilization began? Or where it is heading?
Very good at working stone is a huge understatement!
Funny you say that. I was thinking that if an alien civilization came here, with a totally different tech vector, I wonder how strange a whole world of electricity or combustion engine would look to them
Exciting video. I'm psychic and saw some 15 years ago about the mould technique.
As I was myself unsure of this I decided to research it. My biggest mistake. Once you read the work of Egyptologists and about stone quarries one gets misled and burdened with colossal confusion. So much so that I forgot the main theory itself.
What better way to move massive blocks of stone than to make the very stones.
The video hits the nail on the head. Congrats!
I'm also psychic and I foresaw you writing this post even before you foreseent what you seent
Happy to know. You can perhaps then even tell the other things I saw with regards to the pyramids.
What is the name of the music you use in this video
excellent video
YOU CANT BELIEVE THAT ARABS BUILT KEMIT. Because when you say
”EGYPTIAN” then you’re referring to gypsy people who now call themselves “ EGYPTIAN “. KEMIT and Egypt aren’t interchangeable, it’s either KEMET or Egypt but you keep going back and forth in your description
It's a gaslighting technique.
Another misinformed person in the comment section lol this is the norm in these ridiculous afrocentric videos, Europeans gave the Romani people the name "Gypsy" because they mistakenly assumed they were Egyptians because of they're complexion, notice they didn't call them Nubian or Ethiopian, so what does that tell you about the Egyptians complexion in ancient times
Technically Kemet was an 18th dynasty term for one area
Smai TaWi or Ta Mery is more accurate for what the Rametch called the area…
And Egypt is a misinformed Greek interpretation of Heka-Ptah(which was in Ta-Nehesi=Nubia);
so Egypt has NOTHING to do with the great civilization building that took place there…
By the time it was called EGYPT the great dynasties were over
@nicoscarfo4486 IT TELLS US THAT THEY KNEW THE MULLATORIZED MIXNICITHIES[ ALA ALEX THE G-R-E-E-K OTTOMAN[OTHERMAN] TURKS(A-R-A-B\EREB ETYMOLOGY=MIXED) GERMAN VANDALS FRENCH AND BRITISH INVADERS!!! ETC "N-O-T" THE ORIGINAL KHEMITIANS INHABITANTS\FOUNDERS OF ANCIENT KHEMIT!!!
@@nicoscarfo4486 If you weren't misinformed yourself, you may have escaped the ridiculous bandwagon. The original gypsies are from India and were indeed dark/swarthy skinned, hence them being called Egyptian. On top of that, the ancient Indian peoples were originally from East Africans/Ethiopians. DNA doesn't lie, and even their historical docs prove it so. No getting around Egypt being black, but keep crying!
But many structures were built long before the Egyptian dynastic period, perhaps even before the great floods and solar flares. Please tell us more about the pre dynastic time.
There are some Pyramids in America built before the ones in Egypt. There is one in South America , larger and older than the ones in Egypt. Adam and Eve were in America long before they went to Africa. Some of their children REMAINED IN AMERICA. When they left for Africa, they settled in the Nile Valley. Their children whom remained in the Nile Valley when Adam and Eve left for another part of Africa, were the first Egyptians and obviously took their Mound and Pyramid building culture with them TO Africa. Contrary to what they say, THE AMERICAS IS THE TRUE OLD WORLD.
Don't forget that Wakanda, a secret country has exisited for 66 billion years. Wakandans kept dinosaurs as pets around 120 million years ago, thats why you will find so many dinosaur bones near Lake Victoria where Wakanda likely exisits!
@@EdenSophia118😅 LOL that makes no sense since we know for a fact pangea existed
@@SeanMichael-yt4ps When did it end?
@@SeanMichael-yt4ps When did Pangea end? How did it come about?
Nice vase lol.
Thanks for the great info.
The vase is really interesting! But as Ben from UnchartedX showed the level of symmetry doesn't add up to the ancient product, nor the size of the sample group (Thousands and thousands) I'd note also the lip is minimal compared.
That eye of Horus looks terrible! :D
Lolol. It looks pretty good.
But you have a point.
Notice also that this is their first try. If we keep at it for decades then our tooling and precision will increase.
Note that any tool that rotates like that will eventually achieve almost perfect symmetry.
@@withoutHistory I take your point, but rotating the piece doesn't explain all the points of symmetry in the original stone work. The handles should be well within modern tolerance (a milling machine is needed). To do that the tool must rotate. I'd like to see them do one in stone so thin you can see through it.
But yes, they did make a stone, well, cup, there's little noteworthy lip. The lip creates a new problem, the stability of the piece. The internal lip cut requires astute mathematics.
Not sure if you saw the paper where they scanned a vase..? Very interesting
@@benjaminlusty91 correct. Especially the symmetry observed in artefact like the giant statue of Ramses II. We definitely don’t know everything.
@@benjaminlusty91the handles had significant imperfections in unchartedX's (completely unverifiable and unknown) vase.
@@chiznowtch I could be wrong, I will take another look. Regarding its providence; Maybe, but irrelevant as they are doing scans on verifiable vases currently. I do however share the opinion it is a legitimate old dynasty vase.
Very engaging images of the African children, but as for your claim of " Totally Solved " ? How far from the truth this is. A very good travelogue, maybe, but you addressed less than one percent of the questions posed by archaeology. You will have to work much harder to dispel the theories of higher technologies. Even to infer that all the intricate carvings and hieroglyphics were clubbed out of the granite with a two pound rock + a lot of manhours ? I guess that I have added to your audience on this channel, watching right to the end to maximise your " click-fees. "
Just because you can do something doesn't mean that's how it was or is done. You will never know for sure until the time machine is made.
How do they drill when the drill is not vertical, but in horizontal position?
Many of the ancient stone working techniques are still carried out today by modern Egyptians who practice traditional techniques using traditional tools.
There are videos on TH-cam showing these guys at work
You do know that the Egyptians of today had to send statue's to Italy to polish and even the Italians couldn't get the same level of finish that the original builder had done. Clearly the technique's and/or technology was more advanced and let not mention how they managed to move and place each stone to such an incredible height to apparently over 300 plus pyramids.
wrong. perhaps there was some polymer produced and used but there is no way it was widespread and certainly not 'how the pyramids were built'.
No polymer molded blocks.
No readily available polymer manufacturing.
Why?
Because the blocks of the pyramid are too much of a mess. Rough, disparate, irregular.
If you mold things you end up with hundreds of identical things. We simply don't have that. They were not molded.
Now a rock softener. i.e. a 'polymer maker'. This is a possible but the point is that it clearly was either expensive or difficult or both.
Why? Because of lack of ubiquity. Many, many things would be done that way if it were possible and feasible: not too expensive, not too difficult.
But all we see really is the digging out of obelisks and that gouge pattern that looks like the rocks must have been soft (maybe). i.e. the technique confined to one use. And when we peruse that use we find large radius curves. If you have a softener you would maximise its use by using wherever possible simple 'gouges' down into the material and cut out sections. kinda use it like a knife. make cuts. if you want to take off the first half inch from a pat of butter with a knife you cut it off. you don't scrape it off with the knife, layer by layer, do you?
I KNEW it. I was certain they used catamarans or trimarans. But in your video we are shown how it was done. Envision a 10 pontoon bridge. Then see it as 10 sturdy multi oared boats in a row. Attached by a very solid cross deck with masts for intelligently and powerfully rigged masts. you can know for certain their landing stage and dock architecture were built for modular access, and other heavy docks and piers were positioned in the Nile to mate with these ten boat stone moving barges. Image at 25.52. Thank you to the video creator.
Then the question is. How do you move a 50 ton or 100 ton block of stone over a wooden pier?
A layer of smooth stones would be laid across the strong deck. The big stone would slide over the thinner stone fairly readily. A super strong wooden floor. @@petervermeer.4904
A lot of loose ends to be tied up. Like the tremendous heat required to create your concrete /limestone mixture.
Agreed. Also the creation of all the required aggregate. Hate how it is just assumed that gravel was randomly collected for the geopolymer. If this happened, at all, the gravel came from all the quarrying, grinding, chiseling, shaping etc... which would leave all the supposed geopolymer with a blend of stone, absent in nature and instantly recognisable as man-made.
I would like to see a 100 ton obelisk be transported. Transportation was not addressed adequately. We still can not move 100 ton stone blocks
I think I have the problem of transporting the heavy materials worked out. It’ll take me a few years to prove it out and when I do I’ll start my own TH-cam channel.
Harmonic resonance throat humming?
Combine the mining hypothesis (Curious Being channel) with Davidovits and you have a useful hypothesis.
Thanks for this. Much appreciated ❤
I still believe they could have used pressurized water to cut and design things. I think it would be relatively easy to make about 3 to 5 psi of air and a water wheel pumping water to a higher collector tank, and send it down a series of smaller and smaller line where it would be hit with the pressurized air. We use water jet cutting today. It has a faster, and more penetration cut than any plasma torch
There is the disk that they don't know its purpose. And the Nile was much closer then as well
@CarsCatAliens "I still believe they could have used pressurized water to cut and design things." Are you seriously suggesting that water pressure (which these days IS used for cutting but require about 2,000 psi) would be generated by material extant in the age of the Pharaohs? Think it through
Where is all the video/animation from? Is it a game?
The ONLY possible way it makes since to use blocks that weigh more than 100 tons to build a wall is if were easy to move them.
Modern Day Archaeology Mantra: "Don't let the facts get in the way of the (their) truth."
Would love your insight into the H blocks of Peru lol I'm sure it will be just as entertaining
I lone people who just come here and didn’t even watch the video and spew out none thought out comments.
Please watch and you’ll see that we answer most of your questions
Stones made of granite and limestone cannot be melted and reformed. Melt granite and you get a black goo that hardens to form obsidian , a black glass. Trying to melt limestone gets you CO2 gas and Calcium Oxide.
Geo-polymer, huh? New one on me. Sort of makes sense, though. And the one sample from the Pyramids seems to support this. Have there been other examples found?
It is special that Davidovtz is mentioned here, who discovered the geopolymers in Egyptian and other structures.
Of course there were also many artists just like now, they made beautiful things, but not everything looks like art.
the jar that is shown from 11.50 minutes looks nice, but is very crudely finished and clearly does not fall under works of art.
If it really took that much effort to make something like this, it would also be nicely finished, but this seems like a "cheap" jar that was sold on the market.
Not surprising, because you can crush any kind of stone and easily make a nice pot with cement, just like a potter does now.
The beautiful and large granite stones and statues also look very homogeneous, it does not seem to come from nature, but also to be artificially made.
Everything is possible with cement and with geopolymers the distinction with natural stone is indistinguishable, as stated in the film.
Large statues that are said to be made in one piece often have damage, the plaster has broken off and underneath it is made of ordinary bricks, but that is never discussed.
Figures in walls are also plasterwork that was worked when it was still soft, so not carved out with a copper chisel, but worked with wooden spatulas, as a sucdoor does.
Undoubtedly, hard stone has also been worked manually, but certainly not everything.
Thank you for this amazing video of knowledge you have done with your team..
Be proud bro!
Subscribed💖✌️👍
the image at @2:30 I'd particularly like to have the source of.
Appreciated
Maximum Respect
🇬🇧🇯🇲
Love you right back Andrew!!
Have any cores from the drilling been found?
Plenty. We discuss their property in the video
Thank you. Just curious if they were found amassed, suggesting a workshop/processing site, or more randomly scattered, suggesting either drilled in situ, or scattered subsequently.
I live in an historical mining area, dating back nigh on as old as the later pyramids, we find more recent drill holes in rocks everywhere from mining over the last few hundred years since the Industrial Revolution, sometimes in piles where they were collected and assayed for mineral content or occasionally near the site they were drilled, the latter tend here to be in locations where mining drills and bits were being tested and developed, rather than any practical functional use for the holes or the resulting cores.
Also length of the cores could be interesting, possibly shedding some insight into the drilling process.
Lol. They have found the quarries where the stones from the pyramids were cut. The stones from the pyramids were proven to be from those quarries. As in, it's the exact same stone. There would be no quarries if they could just pour the stones.