World Scholar's Cup Sydney Global Round 2019: Debate Showcase
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2019
- The Debate Showcase at the Global Round of the World Scholar's Cup in Sydney, which brought together 2100 students (and slightly more alpacas) for five days of discovery, friendship, and debate.
This debate was really good indeed, but if I were the negative side, I would start straight away with "Everyone can become the best leader". In the affirmative team rebuttals there were always brought up terms "majority" and "minority". However the motion "Best leaders come from the margins" doesn't presuppose that the opposition should go on about majority. The concluding sentence of the last negative speaker should've been their beginning.
P C I agree because marginalization doesn’t represent the term minority. You can be in the minority but not marginalized. People are great debaters but went off topic...
@@liusunny10baba Yes, it's a valid point as well, but negatives still would have more advantage.
YES I agree on that point
Many debators went off topic. And also negatives had more advantages.
Please be aware that these are students that have little to no experience they are also nervous so please be open minded to how they feel
This showcase was interesting. Although, I must say that I think it was interpreted wrong... You could here everyone in the crowd cheer when a speaker basically insulted the other team, disregarding the fact that this is a debate and doesn't represent the opinions of the debaters themselves. It's pretty stupid. But there were some amazing debaters though
Rachel Panth I agree this debate was really interesting, but to me some debaters who gave those insults, delivered it in a strategic manner that it engaged the judges and audience in the room. Even if those insults were opinion based, they were still part of the debaters’ speech which did in fact support their point, so i would call it a strategy instead of an insult. So overall i liked the way all of them debated :) especially the final speaker for the negative team
@@haru365isme but like insults are generally considered as bad debating... It may make the speech more intresesting. But from a purely logical point of view its useless
Because they were competitive, representing their country, school. How could they hold that. You may say that they could just hold their anger but think the pressure, the crowd, their school. How do you think they would respond?
19:13-19:41 Pay attention to Figo's facial expressions they're hilarious
HAHAHA
Absolutly
Humty Dumty
Not sure that’s a place to showcase them tho
Hahahahahaha yes sooooo true🤣🤣
thqt was cringe icl 😭
its been a year since i was there...it was the best event I was ever at.
WSC needs a better debate format, this isn't cutting it, competitive debates often are a lot more technical and have arguments that actually link to analysis with substantive rebuttle, still enjoyed this tho
Fr. The time given for rebuttals in one’s speech is very minimal and hence no productive conclusion is ever drawn moreover there’s a huge need for more questions on speeches.
YOU GO THIRD SPEAKER AFFIRMATIVE AND ALSO XAVIER! Love all you scholars see ya at TOC Edit: okay but wscpwaarty
The debate was so good.
Hi guys ! I’m hazel from Melaka and I went to the Sydney round . I would like to give a comment here coz I was at the top level . So first off I’m going to say that I’m neutral about this motion and I’ll tell you why . So first off the speakers has been constantly mentioning the examples of world leaders like Donald trump and Barack Obama and the speakers are constantly giving comparisons about their leadership skills . I support with the negative side which said that leaders doesn’t have to be a political leaders as mentioned presidents . I also agree with the affirmative which mentioned about them gaining their experience through them being treated harshly by the majority like how there are still children who are sleeping on the road or those who have been made slaves. These had made the marginalised better in solving conflicts in fields like politics and economy . They understand the hard work that they have to face as a leader .
Thank you for listening !
melaka ? from which school? one of my senior also went to sydney 2 years ago
omg heyy my name is Hazel too
That lady from the Bahamas was killing it!!!!
"racism didn't stop with obama"
"OMG ARE YOU SAYING THAT YOU LOVE TRUMP AND ENDORSE EVERYTHING HE'S EVER DONE?????? IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE IMPLYING?!"
Damn! What a showcase!
Xavier from New Zealand, Saint Andrews Collage had by far the most developed and immersing argument, I even believe that he beat 3rd speaker from the negative side
My daughters are going to the 2024 WorldScholars debate in Kenya. Any recommendations or ideas on how to win?
First time is wsc this year and it was amazing, everyone was so warm and welcoming and although I traded my alpaca in the "black market" the whole experience was great, unfortunately I wont go to the global rounds because of the whole corona virus outbreak but such a lovely event
Didn't they cancel WSC?
woshi i don’t think so. It happened where I live and people are going to the global rounds from my country.
@@cottonmint7880 Ohh... They cancelled wsc in my country for some reason :( goodluck!!!
woshi that’s sad. Unfortunately my experience for this year is done
woshi which country did they cancel it in?
I am about to go to my first regional round this debate helped me understand what I can expect
Just had my first regional round too 😂 how did you perform?
@@albertogeorge2903 Good I got 6 medals 2 gold 4 silver
@@albertogeorge2903 Which Regional Round did you go too
@@SarthAgrawal nice I went to the Cairo regional round and I got 6 silver medals and 1 gold my team got 3rd overall
I did mine today and the award ceremony is tomorrow
How can I get South African learners to enter? Is the showcase annual?
Wait, is it Junior or Senior debate showcase? If you pay attention to their badges, there are seniors and juniors as well. What's wrong?
Both Seniors and Juniors participated in the showcase, as the bowl was run on the same day for both of them.
Strange.. I don't think it's fair.
Why should Sidney have only two junior speakers, while other Globals eight (or even more in the pannel of judges) Some great debaters missed the opportunity then, because of that strange mix.
I agree with you, but I think that the issue was simply surrounding the venue, as scholar's cup may have not been able to secure a room large enough for the bowl for two seperate days (?)
im pretty sure these were the seniors because there is another debate of the 2019 cup that specifies juniors as the debaters
Possibly this is a senior round the juniors are just students who have senior team members thus they to must qualify with the senior.
Hi there @Kevin Kuo
Will you be posting the Durban Mini Global Round Debate Showcase?😁
amazing debate!
WOWWEEEE the third speaker on the affirmative team was ON FIREEEEEEEE THE SASSSSS QUEEEEEENNNNNNN
hi i know who u are >:)
im going to seoul this year for globals and can tell that this debate really helped me on how i can start my intros
you go third aff. speaker!
she was outstanding
anyways, thanks for posting this video! it really helped a lot
hiii I'm going to seoul tooo
if i go against you i will beat you up
@@kendallsprocreateart4327 me too!
@@r4yn77 OMG how was it??
@@manishkamouvery5961 so memorable 😭❤️
I see Indonesia (1st speaker of affirmative team)
Is internet access allowed during debate?
yes
@@julietaorourke how much info do you need
not anymore
@@ughkaliyah.really?
@@luvleytt yeah, only for the first 15 minutes, but once the actual debate begins you can't use them
19:23 -That eye cross 🤣🤣
lmao i just noticed it
I QUALIFIED FOR CAPE TOWN GLOBAL ROUND!
Even tho I don't know you at all, good job!
Can you give me tips? I'm going for a regional round and want to at least go to the global round
Nice job, good luck
This is nice Hi Logan this was a very interesting debate
Gbemisola Treasure hi
I mean at 19:30,what was that?
I'm going to the Bangkok global round
14:20
, the speaker had misinterpreted the donation , bill gates donated to a charity but the 99 % she stated was donated to a private fund under bill gates name.
However he did do many good deeds and donated and developed many third world countries but the information she stated at that point was wrong.
I can't believe I am in 2020 round and going to Muscat
Congrats my regional round is tomorrow any tips I'm in Pakistan Lahore BTW
beena salman I bet u got many medals 😁
@@jinninsocheat3513 I got only 2 gold and 1 silver but who cares at least I qualified and I was the only one in my school to go to the debate showcase
Muscat got cancelled
Muscat got cancelled so I may go to Australia
I wanted to add a comment but I was on the second floor so i’ll say it here.
I’m speaking if I was on the affirmative; recently, an official legal law is being considered (the law was initiated by Trump and his minions) where in companies related to the federal government are basically allowed to choose who gets in or not by their race, gender, sexuality, etc. that includes housing as well. That’s all the news that came out, hopefully the law won’t pass. I just thought that may be a point that would be useful
being rich doesn’t mean u were born rich all the time some people built themselves so they know both aspects sometimes or they have at least felt the same thing I mean there’s a high chance cuz the rich community is limited like we have Jeff Bezos he wasn’t born rich so saying they don’t know about the struggles is kinda eh
43:06 “oof” for Trump
Look at the first speaker at 19:50 seconds
Im going to Globals this year!
which round
which country?
Olivia Watson😻
6:33 lol and 6:58 haha
Interesting "NICE"😎
it's not the battle of affirmative vs negative teams anymore, it becomes obama vs donald trump supporters debate
Hahaha it's logan is crazy hi
2020?
I
I
↓
I thought it should had been the affirmative side but anyway great stuff
Hi kibet
@@raindrops767 who is this
@@jifty3781 reeer
Oh Rodney
R u subbed
I remember this day quite well I loved the black girl when she was like stating her opinion and saying what she believed in especially when she said need I say more 👧🏿
Stewie Griffin sameeeeeee
I think there is also a point of view which was not discussed. Marginalized are not always people that face racism. It could be womens. there are lots of past history of sexism in this world between men and women and how womens are marginalized. So technically it means only womens can be leaders?!?!?!
wsdc made me realize how inferior this debate format is
the speeches are so flawed i can rebut all of them lmao
Nekis😂
This showcase was interesting. Although, I must say that I think it was interpreted wrong... You could here everyone in the crowd cheer when a speaker basically insulted the other team, disregarding the fact that this is a debate and doesn't represent the opinions of the debaters themselves. It's pretty stupid. But there were some amazing debaters though