Txij lì xyoo no tas dhau mus rau lwm xyoo tej zaus cov neeg muaj siabntsws ntshe yuav tsis caum saib nej cov hmoob nplog ko ntxiv lawm, vim tias nej tej tub tej ntxhais xyaumquav npias haus luamyeeb.ntximntxub dhau lawm, hos cov Niag neeg tsis siabntsws mias tej zaus kuj tseem yuav caum saib nej cov tubntxhais qiasneeg ntawd thiab .
@@aher2723 hehe...koj aw tub ntxhais cov ko muaj tsawg leej xwb mog,xyiv li tiag muaj ib txhia neeg nyiam thaij duab tej yam tsis zoo tso rau kom nrov no ,pom tau tias tus yuav ua li cas los muaj cov no tsawg leej xwb hehe...ua tsaug mog.
Free TH-cam Grammar Policing and Free 2nd grade Hmong Lesson for the day: For those who keep describing TWO SISTERS, in Hmong, as being "Ib viv ncaus..." how do you describe a situation of there being three, four, or five SISTERS? Is the situation (of there being 3 or more sisters) still being described as "Ib viv ncaus," too? Or, do you go on to describe that situation (with 3, 4, or 5 sisters) as now being "Ob (or 3, 4, or 5) viv ncaus"? But, logically, if "2 sisters" = "Ib viv ncaus," then "3 sisters" must still equal "Ib viv ncaus," no?, as it would be silly to, then, say, "Oh, 3 sisters? That's PEB VIV NCAUS." But if "3 sisters" = PEB viv ncaus, then isn't it logically consistent, in the first place, to describe 2 SISTERS as being 2 VIV NCAUS?
Cas koj yuav ruam ua luaj li na thaij tso hauv youtube xwb tsis tas koj ua ua introduction koj tej nyuag quav dev kov os ok, mus saib mekas thiaj cov neeg ntiaj teb no tej youtube tso mam los ua TH-cam nawj vim koj tseem xav ruam heev koj xav tias koj yuav ua movie no. Txoj kev ruam tso tseg tau lawm
waiting
Thanks.
thank you.
@@lalroaroteathanks
kuv nyiam tus niam laus lawm nawb ???? yuj yeev
Haha...yog li ces cia koj lub peev xwm lawm xwb nawb hehe...
Koj niam aw cas zk ntxim hlub ua luaj
😀😀😀ua tsaug os❤️
Nyob zoo koj
@@danglor5589 aws nyob zoo koj thiab mog.
Twb g zoo nkauj phem ncawb
@@NkajzebVang-sb9jl hehe...tus yus tsis nyiam ces yeej xav li nawb.
Txij lì xyoo no tas dhau mus rau lwm xyoo tej zaus cov neeg muaj siabntsws ntshe yuav tsis caum saib nej cov hmoob nplog ko ntxiv lawm, vim tias nej tej tub tej ntxhais xyaumquav npias haus luamyeeb.ntximntxub dhau lawm, hos cov Niag neeg tsis siabntsws mias tej zaus kuj tseem yuav caum saib nej cov tubntxhais qiasneeg ntawd thiab .
@@aher2723 hehe...koj aw tub ntxhais cov ko muaj tsawg leej xwb mog,xyiv li tiag muaj ib txhia neeg nyiam thaij duab tej yam tsis zoo tso rau kom nrov no ,pom tau tias tus yuav ua li cas los muaj cov no tsawg leej xwb hehe...ua tsaug mog.
Hmoob nplog tsis tau lub npe hus uas hus dab raw noj raw haus lis hmoob america
@ailee6199 hehe...
Free TH-cam Grammar Policing and Free 2nd grade Hmong Lesson for the day:
For those who keep describing TWO SISTERS, in Hmong, as being "Ib viv ncaus..." how do you describe a situation of there being three, four, or five SISTERS?
Is the situation (of there being 3 or more sisters) still being described as "Ib viv ncaus," too?
Or, do you go on to describe that situation (with 3, 4, or 5 sisters) as now being "Ob (or 3, 4, or 5) viv ncaus"?
But, logically, if "2 sisters" = "Ib viv ncaus," then "3 sisters" must still equal "Ib viv ncaus," no?, as it would be silly to, then, say, "Oh, 3 sisters? That's PEB VIV NCAUS."
But if "3 sisters" = PEB viv ncaus, then isn't it logically consistent, in the first place, to describe 2 SISTERS as being 2 VIV NCAUS?
Ua tsaug ntau os ,ho qhia cais meej2 li no zoo heev ua tsaug ua tsaug.
Cas koj yuav ruam ua luaj li na thaij tso hauv youtube xwb tsis tas koj ua ua introduction koj tej nyuag quav dev kov os ok, mus saib mekas thiaj cov neeg ntiaj teb no tej youtube tso mam los ua TH-cam nawj vim koj tseem xav ruam heev koj xav tias koj yuav ua movie no. Txoj kev ruam tso tseg tau lawm
hehe...ua tsaug koj qhiab nawb 😀😀😀🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️