I’ll say this. I’m currently in Monaco for a couple of weeks and I’ve seen countless Rolex Submariners. I saw a guy at a coffee shop wearing a super ocean today and I couldn’t take my eyes off it. Looked amazing in person.
It is a very nice looking watch, just a bit thick for my preference. The submariner is perhaps a tad bit too big for my wrist as well, but I really enjoy wearing it.
Exactly this. The SO just has the cool factor over the Submariner. Too many people follow a cliche and buy a Sub making their watch selection no different to anyone else. It also says, ‘I don’t really know anything about watches so I went safe’.
@Nick-r9z It can be as cool as ever (and as gorgeous as ever) but if the dimensions are off (which they are on the SO) it renders everything else futile. 14.35 mm thick and almost a 52mm lug to lug? Really?? That's a massive watch on most wrists. There's a reason why you see countless submariners on peoples wrist; because it wears like a glove. There's a reason it's popular and worn by so many. The SO is also a whopping 173grams.The submariner while plain and boring, has the perfect goldilock dimensions. That can't be argued. On top of the virtually perfect dimensions, the glidelock clasp is incredible. It makes it so that you can get the tiniest of adjustments for the best comfort on your wrist. I personally love the look of the Breitling SuperOcean heritage over the submariner, but unfortunately, the dimensions don't make it nearly as comfortable as the submariner. Especially for 12-14 hours of all day every day wear. If Breitling ever refines this model to 40-41mm, 12 to 12.5 mm thick, 46-47mm lug to lug, and add an on-the-fly quick adjust on the clasp to get the perfect fit depending on temperature, they will win.
If I get the Rolex for 8900 and the Breitling for 5500 MSRP, then, of course I would go for the Rolex. But since I could get the Breitling for 3000 plus and the Rolex, not below 13000, I went for Breitling.
I absolutely love that breitling. I own a sub and love it as well but honestly it's not special anymore. The AR coating on the soh gives it a nice touch.
I own both 41 126613LN and b20 42. The Breitling is an amazing watch, love it on rubber, love that it’s not a Rolex Homage. The lume they need to fix asap, and clasp you have is nice minus micro adjust. For the price especially discounted Breitling is hard to beat by other brands. The Sub on the other hand is the most perfect iconic watch ever, the king of divers. Great review! I prefer the Breitling over any Seamaster or Tudor doing Homages.
Thank you. I like this Breitling as well, and would be tempted to buy it, if I did not already own a few other luxury divers. I think the Breitling is just a little bit too flashy, and thick for my preference.
I am so glad I don't like Rolex watches, I cannot understand their appeal and why they are so desired. I like the Breitling way more, I also think Zenith is way nicer than Rolex in another comparison (Daytona). Why do people really crave for a Rolex is inexplicable for me.
I like the styling of Rolex watches, yes they are expensive, but they are well built. One of the good things about the watch hobby is that there are so many options out there, so you can buy what you want.
@@torontowatches9709 uhmm yes, how can I hate something without actually trying it out? and what do you mean modern Rolex? Do you imply by this that old Rolex watches are sub-par in quality? cause they are not but I don't like them, new or old, their design does not appeal to me.
I agree. The Zenith el primero chronoMaster is superb. I'd take that over a Daytona. I do like the Sub though but wow that Breitling is so classy, a masterpiece
@@WrongTimeWatch I think that Rolexes look amazing. I don’t know how they do it, or what it is, but considering they are copied by other makes so much it’s amazing how they just ooze quality and are a step up. I still think the SO Heritage is more classy but you can’t deny the appearance of a Rolex.
I own the SOHII for a year and for the money (3600€ with rubberstrap, factory new) it is really amazing. I use the glide lock of the clasp that comes with the rubberstrap often. I think prices on the grey market went up a bit since. Mine is very accurate and looks great, daily worn. The lume is sufficent for me to tell the time at night. I also find the 72h power reserve very useful. A sub is a dream for the future for me.
I agree, I think it is a good watch for the money. My preference is for slightly thinner watches, and maybe a little less flashy, but the sub is kind of flashy. So, for me it comes down to buying what I like, and I happen to like the sub more than the SOH, but if I had the means, I would like to have both in my collection.
What is even better is the regular superoceans. I guess they are all different with each other so you might as well get the Rolex and then get the Breitling (or the other way around).
That is a good thing about this hobby, so many different styles and shapes of watches. Should be a watch for every person. In this case I prefer the submariner.
For watch lovers, you can’t go with the Breitling. I got a SOHII b01with the panda dial in my collection and it absolutely blows the sub no date out of the water with its quality. The sub is more rugged looking and the bracelet is a scratch magnet. I had to change it to a nato strap.
was gifted a Breitling submariner as a gift and i've cherished it for the last few years and I always get compliments on it. I'm getting married in a few months and am looking to get a Rolex before the big day. Thanks for the video comparison!
2 different watches, can't compare them. If someone is buying and in mind is the watch to keep a steady value, for now anyway, it's the sub. You may buy the Breitling with a certain discount while the chances of a discount on a sub are very slim. Provided that you have an AD that got a lot of money off you over the years and the sub will be accessible. I wouldn't put my self choosing between the two, they can't be compared as they are very different. Comparison - similar items. Congrats on the sub Kevin, date or no date is an all rounder and will never bore you.
That is a good point, and I tend to agree to a certain extent. I like to compare things, and I am always interested in how different watches compare to each other.
So I'm actually looking to get the Tudor BB58 and the Breitling SOH2 (obviously not at the same time :-D ). HOWEVER, I'm actually thinking whether or not it would make more sense in just getting a secondhand Rolex sub instead. Both the Tudor and the Breitling will cost about as much as a secondhand Sub. And the resale value in the future will be better with the Rolex off course. Such a luxury problem haha!
I would try to get a Submariner new from the AD, unless you are looking for a vintage nor neo vintage Submariner. I really do like by BB58 though. I still have my BB58, and a Submariner.
Watching this video I can see why Rolex sets the standard, Whatever love I had for the Brightling, Rolex has knocked it out of me. You have a beautiful Rolex submariner.
@@WrongTimeWatch because greymarket accepts the risk of an uncertain time when it will be sold, they also have to be smart in receiving stuff because one bad thing can really destroy them as a greymarket, I have almost never heard of greymarket committing fraud in selling their products in the area where I live,
There is more than £3K rrp price difference between these two, notwithstanding the aftermarket price premium of the sub which effective means you could have 3 SOH's for Sub money! On that basis the Superocean Heritage smashes the sub, ego buys the Rolex Sub. Its not 3 times the Superocean, which aesthetically is the nicer looking watch.
It's the Sub for me. I fell in love with Rolex as a teen watching Magnum P.I. and I never did get his Pepsi GMT out of my head. I am eagerly waiting for the market to cool (hopefully) and for the "flex" douchebags to move on to something else so maybe I can justify buying the 14060M. Great job!!
It is good to know that I am not the only one who was introduced to Rolex through Magnum PI. A Rolex Pepsi GMT is my dream watch. There are probably a number of folks who were introduced to the brand through the older James Bond movies as well though. Thank you.
@@WrongTimeWatch Yeah I get the whole Magnum PI look with the oyster. I’ve got the Pepsi on Jubilee & I think it looks amazing. I wouldn’t say no to one on Oyster but the polished centre links really bug me.
Horology and luxury do not contradict each other, and actually can go hand in hand. While emphasis on “status” only is just completely wrong in my book. Today when people are humiliated by Rolex and like slaves or like in Soviet Union stand in huge lines to get sausage and bread it doesn’t even about higher social status anymore.
I completely agree. I breitling is far cooler. See a Breitling and you think that’s someone who appreciates watches. See a Rolex and you think something a little different.
I do somewhat agree, however Breitling watches are less expensive and could offer a better value. It all depends on what you are looking for in a watch.
Do you live under water? I don’t, I live on land where I spend 99.9999% of my time. When I do go in water I put on a gshock. Not really an issue is it.
@@binyard1972 or maybe just judge and buy a watch on its merits rather than by what it’s called. The whole idea that people are buying ‘diving’ watches is just silly.
those lugs on Breitling look so ugly. It sticks out like, almost protruded out like it's going to bend soon. Makes the watch too long. and looking at this Brietling from the side, it looks like the dial and bezel is sitting on a tin. like plain tin. no detail and class finish at all.
I think that is kind of the styling of this watch historically though. Overall I like the watch, but it is a bit thick for my preference. I do like the Submariner a lot more, even at twice the price.
The Breitling is gorgeous.
I totally agree
Breitling All the way! More classy
I agree, it is more of a dressy looking watch.
Agreed
I’ll say this. I’m currently in Monaco for a couple of weeks and I’ve seen countless Rolex Submariners. I saw a guy at a coffee shop wearing a super ocean today and I couldn’t take my eyes off it. Looked amazing in person.
It is a very nice looking watch, just a bit thick for my preference. The submariner is perhaps a tad bit too big for my wrist as well, but I really enjoy wearing it.
Exactly this. The SO just has the cool factor over the Submariner. Too many people follow a cliche and buy a Sub making their watch selection no different to anyone else. It also says, ‘I don’t really know anything about watches so I went safe’.
@Nick-r9z It can be as cool as ever (and as gorgeous as ever) but if the dimensions are off (which they are on the SO) it renders everything else futile. 14.35 mm thick and almost a 52mm lug to lug? Really?? That's a massive watch on most wrists. There's a reason why you see countless submariners on peoples wrist; because it wears like a glove. There's a reason it's popular and worn by so many. The SO is also a whopping 173grams.The submariner while plain and boring, has the perfect goldilock dimensions. That can't be argued. On top of the virtually perfect dimensions, the glidelock clasp is incredible. It makes it so that you can get the tiniest of adjustments for the best comfort on your wrist. I personally love the look of the Breitling SuperOcean heritage over the submariner, but unfortunately, the dimensions don't make it nearly as comfortable as the submariner. Especially for 12-14 hours of all day every day wear. If Breitling ever refines this model to 40-41mm, 12 to 12.5 mm thick, 46-47mm lug to lug, and add an on-the-fly quick adjust on the clasp to get the perfect fit depending on temperature, they will win.
If I get the Rolex for 8900 and the Breitling for 5500 MSRP, then, of course I would go for the Rolex. But since I could get the Breitling for 3000 plus and the Rolex, not below 13000, I went for Breitling.
When you look at it that way, I won't disagree with you.
I own the 38MM and the green dial on 42MM. I also own a Rolex Sub. I get so many more compliments when wearing the green breitling super ocean.
I can totally see that. The submariner is a little flashy, but not as flashy as the Breitling SOH.
I have the green Breitling too! It’s more bling but oh so beautiful!
I absolutely love that breitling. I own a sub and love it as well but honestly it's not special anymore. The AR coating on the soh gives it a nice touch.
I understand where you are coming from. The Breitling does look like a more expensive watch.
I own both 41 126613LN and b20 42. The Breitling is an amazing watch, love it on rubber, love that it’s not a Rolex Homage. The lume they need to fix asap, and clasp you have is nice minus micro adjust. For the price especially discounted Breitling is hard to beat by other brands. The Sub on the other hand is the most perfect iconic watch ever, the king of divers. Great review! I prefer the Breitling over any Seamaster or Tudor doing Homages.
Thank you. I like this Breitling as well, and would be tempted to buy it, if I did not already own a few other luxury divers. I think the Breitling is just a little bit too flashy, and thick for my preference.
@@WrongTimeWatchYeah bro totally agree for the 200m WR it should definitely be 12mm thick, the lume also needs to be fixed as well as less text!
I am so glad I don't like Rolex watches, I cannot understand their appeal and why they are so desired. I like the Breitling way more, I also think Zenith is way nicer than Rolex in another comparison (Daytona). Why do people really crave for a Rolex is inexplicable for me.
I like the styling of Rolex watches, yes they are expensive, but they are well built. One of the good things about the watch hobby is that there are so many options out there, so you can buy what you want.
Zenith is not nicer than Daytona lol have you ever held a modern Rolex? Or you just like to hate
@@torontowatches9709 uhmm yes, how can I hate something without actually trying it out? and what do you mean modern Rolex? Do you imply by this that old Rolex watches are sub-par in quality? cause they are not but I don't like them, new or old, their design does not appeal to me.
I agree. The Zenith el primero chronoMaster is superb. I'd take that over a Daytona. I do like the Sub though but wow that Breitling is so classy, a masterpiece
@@WrongTimeWatch I think that Rolexes look amazing. I don’t know how they do it, or what it is, but considering they are copied by other makes so much it’s amazing how they just ooze quality and are a step up. I still think the SO Heritage is more classy but you can’t deny the appearance of a Rolex.
Breitling is amazing!!
I totally agree
Agreed don’t get the rolex hype
I own the SOHII for a year and for the money (3600€ with rubberstrap, factory new) it is really amazing. I use the glide lock of the clasp that comes with the rubberstrap often. I think prices on the grey market went up a bit since. Mine is very accurate and looks great, daily worn. The lume is sufficent for me to tell the time at night. I also find the 72h power reserve very useful. A sub is a dream for the future for me.
I agree, I think it is a good watch for the money. My preference is for slightly thinner watches, and maybe a little less flashy, but the sub is kind of flashy. So, for me it comes down to buying what I like, and I happen to like the sub more than the SOH, but if I had the means, I would like to have both in my collection.
@martinschnabel1961 where did you find it new at that price? I found one for 4000 on the grey market this week.
Two awesome watches Kevin, definitely both are worthy for anyone collection I'm going for Breitling
I agree
What is even better is the regular superoceans. I guess they are all different with each other so you might as well get the Rolex and then get the Breitling (or the other way around).
That is a good thing about this hobby, so many different styles and shapes of watches. Should be a watch for every person. In this case I prefer the submariner.
The superocean definitely looks more elegant, not as sporty as the sub. I like it better as a daily wearer.
I don't think you can go wrong with either one. I like that the Submariner is not as thick as the Breitling though.
For watch lovers, you can’t go with the Breitling. I got a SOHII b01with the panda dial in my collection and it absolutely blows the sub no date out of the water with its quality. The sub is more rugged looking and the bracelet is a scratch magnet. I had to change it to a nato strap.
That is good to know. Thanks for sharing.
was gifted a Breitling submariner as a gift and i've cherished it for the last few years and I always get compliments on it. I'm getting married in a few months and am looking to get a Rolex before the big day. Thanks for the video comparison!
Congratulations on the upcoming wedding, and thanks for watching.
I got the B01 movement in my super ocean heritage and I love it
It is a very good looking watch.
That must be the Chrono To have BO1 Movement ?
Brightling ❤
I would like to own one someday.
2 different watches, can't compare them. If someone is buying and in mind is the watch to keep a steady value, for now anyway, it's the sub. You may buy the Breitling with a certain discount while the chances of a discount on a sub are very slim. Provided that you have an AD that got a lot of money off you over the years and the sub will be accessible. I wouldn't put my self choosing between the two, they can't be compared as they are very different. Comparison - similar items. Congrats on the sub Kevin, date or no date is an all rounder and will never bore you.
That is a good point, and I tend to agree to a certain extent. I like to compare things, and I am always interested in how different watches compare to each other.
So I'm actually looking to get the Tudor BB58 and the Breitling SOH2 (obviously not at the same time :-D ). HOWEVER, I'm actually thinking whether or not it would make more sense in just getting a secondhand Rolex sub instead. Both the Tudor and the Breitling will cost about as much as a secondhand Sub. And the resale value in the future will be better with the Rolex off course. Such a luxury problem haha!
I would try to get a Submariner new from the AD, unless you are looking for a vintage nor neo vintage Submariner. I really do like by BB58 though. I still have my BB58, and a Submariner.
Watching this video I can see why Rolex sets the standard,
Whatever love I had for the Brightling,
Rolex has knocked it out of me.
You have a beautiful Rolex submariner.
Thank you. I really enjoy it, and am happy to have it in my collection.
I'd go for the Sub. I prefer no date and I like how thin the Rolex is.
I totally agree. I've really come to appreciate thinner watches, and the no date dial is perfect in my opinion.
when you buy new breitling then you selling tomorrow, dealer will offering -50% / -65% from it price, so buy second breitling more safe😂
Yes, I totally agree, and the same can be said for most watch brands.
@@WrongTimeWatch because greymarket accepts the risk of an uncertain time when it will be sold, they also have to be smart in receiving stuff because one bad thing can really destroy them as a greymarket, I have almost never heard of greymarket committing fraud in selling their products in the area where I live,
Ehhhh, I don’t sell watches!
124060 is just the best!!!
I think so too, I really like it
There is more than £3K rrp price difference between these two, notwithstanding the aftermarket price premium of the sub which effective means you could have 3 SOH's for Sub money!
On that basis the Superocean Heritage smashes the sub, ego buys the Rolex Sub. Its not 3 times the Superocean, which aesthetically is the nicer looking watch.
I agree, when compared to secondary market prices, it is very hard to justify the purchase of a Submariner over the Super Ocean Heritage.
The Breitling looks far better than the Rolex. Even better in the green dial.
I will agree that the super ocean heritage is a good looking watch.
And this is the lower end of soh the b01 movement chrono is wow
They are nice watches for sure
2 great watches, but the sub wins .
Thanks, I really like it
Pretty cool there sending watches for you to review
I totally agree. I really appreciate them loaning in watches for video.
Submariner in NYC means your in sales. It’s a statement piece but in a negative sense.
Thanks, I had not considered it as a negative, but I don't know many people outside the watch community that own a submariner.
I greatly prefer the Submariner. The no-date Sub is arguably the most iconic watch of all time. Glad you are enjoying yours.
Thank you. I hope to enjoy it for many years to come.
Yes... After the Speedmaster...
It's the Sub for me. I fell in love with Rolex as a teen watching Magnum P.I. and I never did get his Pepsi GMT out of my head. I am eagerly waiting for the market to cool (hopefully) and for the "flex" douchebags to move on to something else so maybe I can justify buying the 14060M. Great job!!
It is good to know that I am not the only one who was introduced to Rolex through Magnum PI. A Rolex Pepsi GMT is my dream watch. There are probably a number of folks who were introduced to the brand through the older James Bond movies as well though. Thank you.
@@WrongTimeWatch Would you go for the Pepsi on Oyster or Jubilee?
@@unclejonga I think Oyster because of magnum PI, but the original Pepsi was on jubilee, so tough choice for me.
@@WrongTimeWatch Yeah I get the whole Magnum PI look with the oyster. I’ve got the Pepsi on Jubilee & I think it looks amazing. I wouldn’t say no to one on Oyster but the polished centre links really bug me.
@@unclejonga That is a great point. I would prefer brushed like my Submariner. I might have to go with Jubilee then.
Both are very common..
I have not really seen either watch on wrist out in the "real" world.
@@WrongTimeWatch ow what I'm telling porkies now... ok 👍 😂
@@WrongTimeWatch I think he’s joking, surely. I haven’t seen another Heritage out there. Rolex Sub, yes, but not the Breitling.
Breitling is cooler and more serious brand. Rolex is overpriced status symbol for people who aren’t interested in horology.
I think the same thing could be said for either brand. These are luxury items.
Horology and luxury do not contradict each other, and actually can go hand in hand. While emphasis on “status” only is just completely wrong in my book. Today when people are humiliated by Rolex and like slaves or like in Soviet Union stand in huge lines to get sausage and bread it doesn’t even about higher social status anymore.
I completely agree. I breitling is far cooler. See a Breitling and you think that’s someone who appreciates watches. See a Rolex and you think something a little different.
I own a 114060 and yes im interested in horology
Es una comparasion muy desigual. Rolex es mas lindo y mejor marca siempre. Igualmente el Brtl es lindo
I do somewhat agree, however Breitling watches are less expensive and could offer a better value. It all depends on what you are looking for in a watch.
@@WrongTimeWatch Of course, i have one, is a great watch!!
Superocean that's hard to see underwater with that lume
That is a good point. It should have better lume being a dive watch.
Do you live under water? I don’t, I live on land where I spend 99.9999% of my time. When I do go in water I put on a gshock. Not really an issue is it.
Er yea maybe re name it super land cash grab
@@binyard1972 or maybe just judge and buy a watch on its merits rather than by what it’s called. The whole idea that people are buying ‘diving’ watches is just silly.
@@Nick-cs9dt then don't call it superocean!
those lugs on Breitling look so ugly. It sticks out like, almost protruded out like it's going to bend soon. Makes the watch too long. and looking at this Brietling from the side, it looks like the dial and bezel is sitting on a tin. like plain tin. no detail and class finish at all.
I think that is kind of the styling of this watch historically though. Overall I like the watch, but it is a bit thick for my preference. I do like the Submariner a lot more, even at twice the price.
Just tried on the Superocean yesterday, it looks fantastic. Lugs are fine.
@@alphaofalphas8121 yes they are. It’s part of the style of the watch. It’s like a frame, proudly lifting up and displaying the watch.