Hi, this simulation was done through the workbench mechanical designer ryt? So what is the difference of the simulation we do it in ANSYS CFD solver by defining boundary conditions, and a turbulence model, and defining solver settings?
Here's an analogy: Imagine designing a bridge. Workbench Mechanical Designer is like a simple stress calculator, telling you if the bridge beams can support a certain weight. ANSYS CFD Solver is like a wind tunnel simulator, allowing you to analyze how wind affects the entire bridge structure in detail. Choosing the right tool depends on the complexity of your simulation needs. For basic structural analysis, Workbench Mechanical Designer might suffice. For in-depth analysis of fluid flow and related phenomena, ANSYS CFD Solver is the more powerful option.
I love the way you explain things! Great!
Hi, could you please share the paper that you’ve used these geometry from that with us?
drive.google.com/file/d/13x2VSx-zmi3gT27xU9obP1G-Alh9dgfi/view?usp=sharing
Hi, this simulation was done through the workbench mechanical designer ryt? So what is the difference of the simulation we do it in ANSYS CFD solver by defining boundary conditions, and a turbulence model, and defining solver settings?
Here's an analogy:
Imagine designing a bridge. Workbench Mechanical Designer is like a simple stress calculator, telling you if the bridge beams can support a certain weight. ANSYS CFD Solver is like a wind tunnel simulator, allowing you to analyze how wind affects the entire bridge structure in detail.
Choosing the right tool depends on the complexity of your simulation needs. For basic structural analysis, Workbench Mechanical Designer might suffice. For in-depth analysis of fluid flow and related phenomena, ANSYS CFD Solver is the more powerful option.
What would happen if i directly go to the transient analysis without doing the steady state analysis , will it be wrong?
Hi. Try it and share your findings with us🙂
🎉🎉