This was very helpful to me. By default it appears that every college professor in mathematics is forced to go through everything at the speed of light being that the material is more condensed than a high school course would be. This filled in so many gaps for me. Very thorough and I can't appreciate that enough.
I watched several TH-cam videos. You are the only one who led me to understand what transitive closure is. I subscribed. Thank you :) And btw, you are a funny teacher lol
About Transitive part of "Does not equal" : Explanation in video says " It is not transitive" based on the argument of type a => b b => a & there is no a => a But isn't the definition of Transitive a => b b => c Then there should be a=>c So 1 => 2 =>1 in the video is a => b => a which violates the definition of Transitive property. I calculate this example Transtive
The definition of transitivity does not assume that a, b and c are DISTINCT elements of the set, so "does not equal" is not transitive on sets with more than one element, due to the a -> b -> a case that you cited.
![[TH] VALORANT Champions Seoul - Lower Bracket Final - LEV vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fyYkI80GG4o/mqdefault.jpg)
This is the first time i laughed watching a math video. I would gladly watch your videos for leisure. Thanks for making it interesting!!
This was very helpful to me. By default it appears that every college professor in mathematics is forced to go through everything at the speed of light being that the material is more condensed than a high school course would be. This filled in so many gaps for me. Very thorough and I can't appreciate that enough.
you have a real gift for teaching- it's apparent by watching your videos that teaching is your raison d'être. thank you so much!
I watched several TH-cam videos. You are the only one who led me to understand what transitive closure is. I subscribed. Thank you :) And btw, you are a funny teacher lol
you should link this video on the previous video, it too me a while to find this. Thanks, good video
thank you man ! it's the lectur that makes the subject interesting or not interesting
and you make it too interesting
great video thank you for sharing this with us I hope you do more videos
Thank you very much and this saved my day.
okay this was so helpful, thank you!
pleas come teach my professor how to teach. great video, thanks. I hope you do more videos about Foundations of Adv. Math.
great video, helped a lot !
I don't know how to thank you enough
Very helpful, I’m very grateful 😭❤️😌
You're the BESTEST!! 😘Thank you for your willingness to do this as well as taking the time to do so. It is VERY helpful!! 🤓👍
It’s really helpful for me jee main exam bro 😊 thanku
good stuff sir
THANK YOU VERY MUCH
Great video 🔥🔥🔥
great work!! though i kept hearing the alert tone and for the half of the video i thought it was my iphone but nothing came up LOL🤣
i really enjoyed it ...
very helpful, thank you
Thank you
it is very helpful thank you
thanks, it help me a lot :)
thanks a lot!
Thank you so much for helping me understand it
I never write comments but now I just have to. Thank you very much. :)
So good
Thank you sir.
About Transitive part of "Does not equal" :
Explanation in video says " It is not transitive" based on the argument of type a => b b => a & there is no a => a
But isn't the definition of Transitive a => b b => c Then there should be a=>c
So 1 => 2 =>1 in the video is a => b => a which violates the definition of Transitive property.
I calculate this example Transtive
The definition of transitivity does not assume that a, b and c are DISTINCT elements of the set, so "does not equal" is not transitive on sets with more than one element, due to the a -> b -> a case that you cited.
thank you omfg
Thank you