Project Oathmark/Dragon Rampant- Episode 4C: A Look at the Books - Compare and Contrast (Osprey)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @TheLordUrban
    @TheLordUrban 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I think Oathmark has a lot of potential. Dragon Rampant is fantastic at allowing you to field any kind of force your collection can support.

    • @ten4miniatures
      @ten4miniatures  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s such a great draw for DR, on top of what I think are great, easy rules. I think OM has both going for it, although to a lesser degree. I think there’s room for both on my tabletop.

  • @TJClark-sw2yz
    @TJClark-sw2yz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I enjoyed your review. I think I’m going to look in to Dragon Rampant as well just to expand the use of my army.

    • @ten4miniatures
      @ten4miniatures  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I recommend it! It’s a nice way to use the same minis (and less of them) in another enjoyable way. DR is fun, simple to learn and quite open when building your army.

  • @TheByteknight
    @TheByteknight 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We've had Kings of War, which is all rank and file, since Warhammer FB disappeared.

  • @MrVlandus
    @MrVlandus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ordered the Oathsmark book getting it soon. I will be playing it with my son's.

  • @vulturesuc4
    @vulturesuc4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the review, very informative :)
    I have both sets of rules, but todate have only played DR.

  • @wolfpetersson756
    @wolfpetersson756 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for your review, very clear and covers the two games well. My local group likes to play multiplayer, usually 4 players. Which of these games would work best with 4 players?

    • @ten4miniatures
      @ten4miniatures  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think I’ve seen DR work well with multiplayer, so definitely that one. OM is new, though, and has come out during a pandemic, so we haven’t seen it on the table as much as DR. I think it would work, but DR may be easier, especially with the ease of list building.

  • @lobo3660
    @lobo3660 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot! That's exactly the info I want :)

  • @thenachomancandysavage4074
    @thenachomancandysavage4074 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I've had my eyes on oathmark for a while, sadly no one in my area is interested in old school rank & flank wargaming. Dragon rampant on the other hand I think would be easier to get folk into.

    • @ten4miniatures
      @ten4miniatures  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Perhaps start with DR, because of its lower model count. Then move on to Oathmark when the armies are big enough. Let me get a few games of each played in the near future and we can see what length of play looks like.

  • @cptlazyjack
    @cptlazyjack 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Osprey are a great company. My personal favourites from Osprey are Zona Alfa, Gaslands & Frostgrave.

  • @PMMagro
    @PMMagro ปีที่แล้ว

    I like Dragon Rampant. Never tried Oathmark but love Frostgrave from the same guy.
    For me the "mix your own faction" in Oathmark is a negative and I feel many old players shun form that having their favorites (Orcs/elves, undead, whatever) or wnating to make a ne faction (not a new mixed collection).

  • @paulgibbons2320
    @paulgibbons2320 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dragon rampant looks like very frustrating activations. Very basic. Oathmark has a little more too it.
    Best rank and flank system is A song of Ice and fire by Cmon. The NCU board is a fantastic thing.
    The card play will turn some players off though. An it's not a game where you can deploy any minis you like.