The great controversy of this Match Lasker vs Schlechter has not been fully clarified yet. Schlechter was winning The Match by 1 point ahead, he only needed a draw in The last Game (10th) to win the Match..... but Schlechter took risks and played to win. Why? What was the reason? Schlechter was a very kindly and sportive man, he didn't want to win playing defending....(version 1). Or there was another Reason? Did he really need to win by 2 points ahead to win The Title? (Version 2)
The great controversy of this Match Lasker vs Schlechter has not been fully clarified yet. Schlechter was winning The Match by 1 point ahead, he only needed a draw in The last Game (10th) to win the Match..... but Schlechter took risks and played to win. Why? What was the reason? Schlechter was a very kindly and sportive man, he didn't want to win playing defending....(version 1). Or there was another Reason? Did he really need to win by 2 points ahead to win The Title? (Version 2)
Excelentes partidas gran aprendisaje!!!
Egal wie schlecht Lasker geheißt wird, Carl wird immer Schlechter heißen....
Parecen Muchísimo jugando al Ajedrez Mundial a Las Grandes Aplicaciones de Ajedrez.