Paul McCartney's Vocal Transformation 1963-1970

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @Mondgeist7777
    @Mondgeist7777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    1967 to those who have ears to hear.

    • @kadektionanda561
      @kadektionanda561 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      67s Paul voice is very different and i know people getting age to but how his voice can changing only one year?

  • @TheSilentRevolution1988
    @TheSilentRevolution1988  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    00:00 to 02:07 - 1963
    02:07 to 05:27 - 1964
    05:28 to 08:28 - 1965
    08:29 to 11:00 - 1966
    11:01 to 16:24 - 1967
    16:25 to 22:26 - 1968
    22:27 to 26:03 - 1969
    26:04 to 28:26 - 1970

  • @willallen7034
    @willallen7034 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Cool video man
    Thanks for all the work you do
    Been following for years
    Rarely have time to comment or engage. But thanks for the years of content & hard work
    And the livestream hangouts which I often silently watch.

    • @TheSilentRevolution1988
      @TheSilentRevolution1988  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks dude :) glad you’ve stuck around through the highs and lows! Hopefully this will be a good resource for people to draw their own conclusions about the Beatles.
      This is also a good video to fall asleep to

  • @minilla4778
    @minilla4778 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great vid tsr

  • @ConnorTerrell
    @ConnorTerrell 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's all Paul. One guy throughout the whole thing.

  • @mores5780
    @mores5780 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ant thoughts on how his brother Mike fits in? I don't buy the death either, am thinking the entire thing was planned just to mess with us. No one died. And the group was not talented to "write" all these hits. Everything is a show.

  • @BOBBYT5751
    @BOBBYT5751 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It all sounds like Paul to me

  • @93TILINFINITYY
    @93TILINFINITYY 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    It all sounds like JPM til 1967.
    All bs aside and "hoax" aside, we all have to step away from the nonsense and our "own or existing conspiracies" and accept that he def was replaced. We will never know the truth. Not yet. But yes its all in the voice. We are all born with a specific sound that only our own vocal chords can create. JPM had a naturally rock n roll raspy voice that you cant miss it. Faul was the perfect impersonter, very good almost perfect, but you can never imitate someone down to the core even with years of "practice" . For me its the pronounciation and style that gives it away for Faul. The high screams and notes that JPM hit are irreplacable. For me, it seems Faul is trying to hard to scream and hit high notes that JPM could ONLY hit NATURALLY.

    • @Jens1-nb9fb
      @Jens1-nb9fb 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When people get older it will be more difficult to sing very high notes

    • @wildannie6788
      @wildannie6788 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yep. 💯💯 The screams with pre-1967 Paul feel organic. Faul screaming sounds like he's struggling. I feel nothing post 1967. Although I do love Let it Be. Faul's voice seems "thinner" to me. You could tell by watching them live Paul loved the rock songs. He was a natural.

    • @jonasrmb01
      @jonasrmb01 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Jens1-nb9fb He would not even have been 25 at the time, you're delusional

  • @johnnada.
    @johnnada. ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you not get copyrighted?

    • @johnnada.
      @johnnada. ปีที่แล้ว

      can’t barely stand to listen to anything beyond revolver except pepper and the few mystery songs

    • @TheSilentRevolution1988
      @TheSilentRevolution1988  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Luck, I guess lmao

  • @OCTOBERBABY7901
    @OCTOBERBABY7901 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I can hear difference in the songs. Its sounds like 2 different singers. Well at least to my ears. : )

  • @gaylerhodes7757
    @gaylerhodes7757 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    1967 - different guy onward. Clearly a replacement.. Open your eyes and ears. It’s obvious if you open your mind.

    • @Tyler-zo6sm
      @Tyler-zo6sm 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's the same guy your voice starts changing as you age

  • @Tyler-zo6sm
    @Tyler-zo6sm 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Paul mccartney never died and you're crazy if you think he did

  • @debramcintosh3692
    @debramcintosh3692 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    James Paul McCaretney did actually die I learned it from a reliable source and go look at the Quarry Men because there were three different Pauls

    • @TheSilentRevolution1988
      @TheSilentRevolution1988  2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      What do you think of the possibility of JPM actually dying in his early teens during the quarry men days or not dying at all? You are right about the three different looking Paul’s in quarry men, so maybe if anything he died much younger than we think. Cause, you know me Debra I’m not buying the death hoax anymore. But, to each their own.

    • @TheSilentRevolution1988
      @TheSilentRevolution1988  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @starz xD

    • @Tyler-zo6sm
      @Tyler-zo6sm 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No he didn't

  • @ga.bri.el.
    @ga.bri.el. ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hes is not good... He is the best!