Istanbul | Rahdo's Final Thoughts

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
  • Help Rahdo Run: / rahdo ❤️ Code of conduct: conduct.rahdo.com 🙂 And now...
    A video outlining gameplay for the boardgame Istanbul. For more game info, www.boardgamege...
    2p Balance Thread:
    www.boardgamege...
    Part I: Gameplay Runthrough
    • Istanbul Gameplay Runt...
    Part I: Gameplay Runthrough (static cam)
    • (Static Cam) Istanbul ...
    Part II: Extended Gameplay
    • Istanbul Extended Game...
    Part II: Extended Gameplay (static cam)
    • (Static Cam) Istanbul ...
    Part III: Final Thoughts
    • Istanbul | Rahdo's Fin...

ความคิดเห็น • 55

  • @ugurbicici2394
    @ugurbicici2394 8 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I was born and grown in in Istanbul as a son of merchant father in old city district where inspired the game founder :) And my father even used to sell carpets like in the game, Rüdiger Dorn maybe passed by the shop of my father :)) So this game is special to me. Not something extraordinary to say but I wanted to get it off my chest :) Thanks for the videos btw, voted...

  • @MassEffectFan113
    @MassEffectFan113 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Easy Fix:
    Place the Dummy Merchant on the Sultan's Palace instead. Fixed. No cause for alarm. Paying 15 for a Gem Stone still takes longer than the method you mentioned.
    They would have to hit the tea house and post office to get enough money to hit Gem Stone dealer. If you would just try a different approach...

  • @LarstigGeval
    @LarstigGeval 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love the gemstone dealer/palace discussion. I almost never visit the Sultan's palace. I usually try to be the first to collect both tiles at the mosque thus earning me gemstones that way,

  • @kevinregan6566
    @kevinregan6566 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rahdo, I'm usually not one for Euro style games but this run through along with several others have shifted my opinions. May have to start picking up a few of these. Thank you again for taking the time to post these run through videos so we can all make intelligent decisions on board games that are available.

  • @willang3433
    @willang3433 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is my pick for KdJ as well, although since I've not played Rokoko or Concordia, my ONLY pick, lol. I nearly spit my breakfast cereal out when you starting singing One Jump from Aladdin! That's exactly how I felt when I sent family members to beat out the competition just when they're one turn away from purchasing a ruby!

  • @slysof6436
    @slysof6436 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, you read my mind! I was looking for a runthrough of this game and the next day TA DA a Rahdo runthrough appears. Thanks. Again, you did such a good job of explaining the game that I bought it.

  • @mayneric
    @mayneric 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    DAMN YOU RICHARD!!!!!!! (fists shaking) Another game I now desire to own after watching you play it.

  • @kosterix123
    @kosterix123 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Totally agree. It is about pattern recognition, always amazing, plus hindering subtly others. Nil downtime, every time different. And shiny pretty rubies. An the sudden sense of urgency once 1 player is 1 ruby short of a victory...
    Announced end 2016 still one of the best games ever. It's not a 2 player gane, it's a gateway game.

  • @TorIverWilhelmsen
    @TorIverWilhelmsen 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I feel the Sultan's Palace is balanced in the sense that it has far fewer gems than the gem stone dealer... as long as everyone knows about the "imbalance" they will probably start out going for the palace first until it is empty, simply because it is "easier" in the start.

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      that balance assumes that everyone is going to go for the palace because "they have to" because it's cheaper, which would be unfortunate because it means the gem merchant isn't (on average) a viable path to victory and the game becomes more scripted (in 2p) which is my worry.

  • @silverfang6668
    @silverfang6668 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There is a variant that we play with that I believe would eliminate the problem you referred to while making the game more interesting. We use the gemstones from our copy of fantastiqa which come in several colors, randomly distribute them on the board, and have a house rule that your wheel barrow can't have two stones of the same color adjacent to each other. p.s., I agree that while this game is fun, Concordia is the better game.

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      neat idea!

  • @eeHalcyon
    @eeHalcyon 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hmm, interesting. I asked about the palace vs. gem stone dealer on the extended gameplay video and it looks like you had the same thought! I will venture that the palace may be better at first, but timing and various other circumstances may make the dealer better as the game progresses, especially in the mid-to-late game after the Palace has been used a few times. Maybe it would be worth testing a house rule to put a starting merchant on the palace instead of the dealer?

  • @TyphoidBryan
    @TyphoidBryan 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I likened this game, in a different review, to Euphoria. Being efficient with your moves and not giving yourself a lot of downtime is a definite advantage towards winning.

  • @mgmccoy100
    @mgmccoy100 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hey Rahdo, I've been a fan of yours for a long time now (over a year) and I really appreciate what you do. You have helped me to expand my board game collection in a well informed way. That being said, I wanted to offer a suggestion. In more of your recent videos, it seems like you spend a very long time in the Gameplay Runthrough videos talking before you start playing. In some of your earlier videos, I think you would spend a few minutes talking about the game (if that) and then you would dive into the gameplay and explain as you went along. More recently, I feel like I want to skip to about the 15 minute mark of the video because you go through so many of the potential strategies and rules. I feel like you still explain whats going on as you play, so its like you explain a lot of strategy and rules at least twice, once before you play and during play. In my opinion, I would rather you just jump into the game play mechanisms right at the beginning of the video and let us see how they work as you go.
    Sorry for the rambling message, tl;dr, Start game play sooner, spend less time talking about the game and just play it.

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      yeah, it varies from game to game. i basically want to get into the gameplay as fast as possible, but I want the gameplay to make sense, and sometimes i think it helps to have a little bit of context before i jump right in. i'm not saying i get it perfect every time... i just kind of go on instinct. :)

    • @mgmccoy100
      @mgmccoy100 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      *****
      Yeah I understand that. Again, I'm a big fan of yours. I got Village, Race for the Galaxy, and Castles of Burgundy on your recommendation. Maybe I am remembering wrong (wearing rose-colored glasses) but that is just the impression that I have had for a while now. Thanks for the reply!

    • @masterbridgemaster1
      @masterbridgemaster1 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ***** For what it's worth, I appreciate the initial context you provide in the opening of the videos, be it 1 min or 15. I think it is important to "set the stage," as it were.

  • @joeldalangin2427
    @joeldalangin2427 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've just played 2 games of this, thanks for the playthrough, it's as good as you said.

  • @MikeThomas-ws9tu
    @MikeThomas-ws9tu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In regards to the unbalance between the gemstone dealer and sultans palace with the two player game, I would just make a house rule to either put the neutral players at both locations or at the big and small mosc or use the dice and place them randomly like the governor and smuggler

  • @petec3250
    @petec3250 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    hey, i know its been a few years and you don't have istanbul in your collection anymore, but i thought i'd just weigh in for other future viewers who are checking out the game. 5:14 - That's assuming one player only focuses on the sultan's palace and the other player only focuses on the gemstone dealer. i noticed you pigeon holed yourself and jen into that when you did this run through. jen could have easily snagged a gem or two from the sultan's palace - making it harder for you to get the next because of your smaller wheel barrow. a couple of times she had her nephew just sitting in jail and she could have easily sent him to sultans palace and gotten a gem on her way to the gemstone dealer where she was going to buy her gem. she totally should have won in the run through. maybe group-think? from watching your videos, i know you prefer less confrontation in games, so maybe your gaming style affected your play of this game - you tend to go off and do your own things with minimal interference.
    when my wife and i play game (2-players) the winner does a little bit of both the sultan's palace and gemstone dealer. it just depends on opportunities that come up. but really, for most decent euros, going all-in with one strategy and neglecting other point scoring opportunities isn't as powerful as being flexible.
    having said that, i am actually not a big fan of istanbul. lol. i'll play it, but i prefer euro games with more weight. my wife likes it, so we play it :). the art is nice. it is a good looking light game. we also use it as a gateway game
    although i disagree your imbalance argument, i do have another beef with the game - abusing paths. i feel like it doesn't take long for you to figure out a path (call it your gem-making engine) and just go back and forth for many turns in row. You can really abuse that early in the game with the post office. I feel cheap when I do it, but the game lets me, so i do it :). i guess that's what you would call breaking the game.

    • @jeffgoggin1394
      @jeffgoggin1394 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Sal Conz I did my own research on this myself. I used only the gem dealer/teahouse combo vs the black market/sultan's palace combo. I called "7" for every roll and applied the roll results to each player at the palace and dealer respectively. Once they had enough goods or money they spent the next turn redeeming them for a gem. The sultans palace earned a gem on turns 4,11,14, and 20 (after that it's not possible to go to the palace without a wheelbarrow upgrade which takes turns and money) the gem dealer earned a gems on turns 4,9,13,17 and 22. The gem dealer was also ready to get a 6th gem without an upgrade in 4 or 5 more turns. Purely between these 2 I wouldn't say the sultan's palace was more powerful especially in the 2 player in which case it's not even possible to get more than 4 gems without a wheelbarrow. Time the other player could be spending at the tea 🏠.

  • @ivanristov5835
    @ivanristov5835 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think that gem stone dealer could be far better choice, if it is close to the tea house Also if you first maximize profits with the market then you can concentrate to getting gems for example 2 actions btw market and some warehouse. you dont have to deliver all goods to change the order so sometimes you will get more sometimes less Lira but once you stockpile enough lira you can go to gem stone dealer and you can also swich btw gemstone dealer and tea house or drop by the police station. But on the other hand you can do this with post office and sultan palace if they are close so it really depends on the game setup which is awesome. Also I would like to say that this place in Istanbul is called Kapali Carsi and it is very beautiful and the rubies you can see them in the museum, which is the sultans palace :)))

  • @hotice88uk
    @hotice88uk 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Rahdo. I might be missing the point, but if the gemstone dealer were a blank tile would you have a problem with there only being the one "seller" of gemstones (the sultan) rather than having two options? If one is exclusively better, yes it might alter the decision-making landscape between a 3/4 player game and a 2-player game, but is that inherently an undesirable thing?

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      one of the game's strengths is that there are a several ways to pursue victory. if you took one of the major ways out of the game, I think it would weaken, especially since a big part of the game is avoiding "following in the footsteps of others". it'd still be a good game, but not as good a game :)

    • @hotice88uk
      @hotice88uk 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** I see, fair enough :) Thinking again I guess an imbalance not only makes the gemstone dealer tile somewhat less relevant, but also any other tiles used in that strategy. Thanks for the reply, and for the excellent runthroughs you keep producing!

  • @YakovPetrovich
    @YakovPetrovich 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think you're right about the Palace and the Gem Stone Dealer, but aren't there more ways to get money? There's the tea house and also special cards that give you money. If you have the re-roll ability you could be raking in the tea house cash to buy gems with. Seems like in a 2p game the Palace will get some more action in the beginning of the game but I can see the Gem Stone Dealer being very handy mid-late game (especially after the Palace prices have increased a lot).

    • @YakovPetrovich
      @YakovPetrovich 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also how about just rolling for the dummy merchants at the beginning of the game? Doesn't seem like that would change much.

    • @YakovPetrovich
      @YakovPetrovich 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've never played Istanbul though, so maybe I'm wrong. I'm still eagerly awaiting until it is released in Canada. Come on June!

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      right, but palace prices don't really raise very much over the course of a 2p game (with 4/5 it grows hugely, but not in 2/3). it's not that gem merchant isn't a viable way to get gems... it's that palace is so much faster, and doesn't require random chance of rolling for money... :)

    • @YakovPetrovich
      @YakovPetrovich 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** Hmm good point. You know I really like the idea you (or was it someone else?) mentioned in the BGG thread to remove a second gem whenever somebody buys one. When I get the game I will definitely give that idea a try since I play most of my games two player as well. Seems like the perfect way to balance it.
      Thanks for the runthrough as always Rahdo!

  • @keseph7749
    @keseph7749 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have played this a few times. It's all about never having to waste moves going back to that fountain. If you do that you are doomed

  • @knehren
    @knehren 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Have u tired putting the dummy merchant on the Palace instead of the Gemstone Dealer? It may balance it out...

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      could be... but i've got to move on to the next game and don't have time to experiment with variants! :)

  • @veerchasm1
    @veerchasm1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would you consider this a PU&D? (I know you've said you aren't a big fan of those).

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yup, very much PU&D

    • @kosterix123
      @kosterix123 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is that

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      pickup & deliver

  • @archmagus1510
    @archmagus1510 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ok since freaking english version of targi cost in my country 27€. i will pay the 5€ and get this game probably.i am kinda charmed by it.and i totally agree that this or concordia should win.i am one of those who would play istanbul very rarely with 2 players.so the unbalance issue dont bothers me that much.
    ps:seems like your camera starting to get some issues lately. it doesnt focuses some times. even the colour saturation is sometimes weird.

    • @kipik2
      @kipik2 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      well, maybe you'd better save 5 and buy Targi ;)

    • @archmagus1510
      @archmagus1510 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      nah targi is good but i rather buy a game for more people.i have some 2 players games anyway now. targi german version cost in my country 15€ and english 27 thats too much

    • @kipik2
      @kipik2 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      well... targi is just a killer with 2. One of the best 2pl games to date ;)

    • @archmagus1510
      @archmagus1510 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      well i believe you totally :D

  • @J-Wheeler-G
    @J-Wheeler-G 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    We have played 4 and 5 players and we found out that the Gemstone dealer is way better than anything else.

  • @Physiology-E-Paathshala
    @Physiology-E-Paathshala 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love it. Period.

  • @DavidDoughan
    @DavidDoughan 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    san juan card game or istanbul? trying to pick one. which would you choose?

    • @kosterix123
      @kosterix123 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Always Istanbul

  • @raulsanchezyellow
    @raulsanchezyellow 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice work thanks

  • @joeldalangin2427
    @joeldalangin2427 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please do a KS where you will perform the whole Aladdin song👍🏻😀

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Joel Dalangin next time, better use a nom de plume!

  • @randybookman
    @randybookman 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should try the game royal palace

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it's a very good game, we have it :)

  • @ElScotterino
    @ElScotterino 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You kinda look like the guy on the box.

  • @EddieInzauto
    @EddieInzauto 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just always call a 12 and roll double sixes at the Tea House. Problem solved.

  • @LosthorizonPT
    @LosthorizonPT 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wa alaykumu s-salam :P