Radioactive Stuff // 2015 edition

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @ez4pz
    @ez4pz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +111

    You know it's bad when even your Geiger counter screams out in pain.

    • @theraq226
      @theraq226 ปีที่แล้ว

      yea haha

    • @Bread.799
      @Bread.799 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I seem to be late

  • @kumachu3649
    @kumachu3649 8 ปีที่แล้ว +429

    I feel like I got radiation poisoning from just watching this

    • @maixwaix6740
      @maixwaix6740 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      well you did not because it takes 25,000 MR to get you sick

    • @ivarandamy1499
      @ivarandamy1499 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Kumatine me too

    • @loquenlucas9060
      @loquenlucas9060 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Steve so need some rad away only 60 caps

    • @tamaragaber
      @tamaragaber 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      well, computers and smartphones also amit radiation.

    • @GRBtutorials
      @GRBtutorials 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      tamaragaber Yeah, and you, and I, and everything in this universe, does too. It’s mostly in the long wave infrared spectrum for us due to blackbody radiation, and other parts of the spectrum for objects at different temperatures. In addition, almost everything is slightly radioactive due to naturally occurring radioisotopes such as potassium-40 and carbon-14.

  • @crambo205
    @crambo205 9 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    WOAH, That pseudoscience on those pedants scare me...

    • @the_mentaculus
      @the_mentaculus 9 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Here, hang this radiation source right over your thyroid gland!

    • @TheKnaeckebrot
      @TheKnaeckebrot 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      this fuckin amulets give you ~16 mSv/a ... thats like working in a nuclear plant ^^

    • @MultiSciGeek
      @MultiSciGeek 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here. You think we would stop after Hiroshima but nah

    • @terryh.9238
      @terryh.9238 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      imagine those poor pets wearing the radioactive pendants!

    • @louistournas120
      @louistournas120 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It reminds me of a case where it was discovered that a ordinary stapler was radioactive. It turns out that the company had filled the inside with sand to add weight to it and it was actually monazite containing sand, which has ThO2.

  • @RumblyGreenEarth
    @RumblyGreenEarth 8 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    I hope you used some Rad-X before filming!

    • @zeechy
      @zeechy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ☭_DRINK_CCCP_420_☭ literally nobody cares

  • @mat2468xk
    @mat2468xk 8 ปีที่แล้ว +155

    You should have used bananas for comparison.

    • @misaalanshori
      @misaalanshori 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      veritasium?

    • @mat2468xk
      @mat2468xk 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +M Isa Yeah.

    • @mat2468xk
      @mat2468xk 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Po Lu Nah, Veritasium is one of those scientific YT channels.

    • @rottis5042
      @rottis5042 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had that exact same idea

    • @NebosvodGonzalez
      @NebosvodGonzalez 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bananas are very Dangerous there Radiation is very Dangerous if a Man it's One He Becomes Gay and can't Make Baby's.

  • @damonjackson5857
    @damonjackson5857 8 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    am I the only one that LOVES the sound of the geiger counter?

    • @mathematicalhuman6858
      @mathematicalhuman6858 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Damon Jackson ℵϙ ⅈ ĹⅈϏ℮ ⅈȶ ȶϙϙ

    • @ratedasmr7811
      @ratedasmr7811 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Nope. Geiger counter ASMR for life

    • @whitrenee1
      @whitrenee1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Damon Jackson Definitely Not For Me I Like The Geiger Counter Sound

    • @Sir.Fithers
      @Sir.Fithers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP BEP

    • @alexanderskladovski
      @alexanderskladovski 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤨

  • @Forssa1
    @Forssa1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +220

    I felt like I got cancer just by watching this.

    • @davis.zakis.dental
      @davis.zakis.dental 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      +Forssa1 Our bodies produce around 5000 cancer cells in 1 minute, sleep on that.

    • @grarglejobber4263
      @grarglejobber4263 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Dāvis Zaķis -- We are world cancer so it's like a pot and a kettle thing at this point.

    • @lunaticluna9071
      @lunaticluna9071 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, i am from saxony. why did you said it because it is in germany?

    • @timlipinski2571
      @timlipinski2571 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Forssa1 Only if you Smoke ! tjl

  • @billstamford1043
    @billstamford1043 9 ปีที่แล้ว +120

    Your a very rare sort of Guy.
    A credit to the intelligent and interesting aspects of human kind.
    Thank you for your presentation, most enjoyable.

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  9 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      +Bill Stamford
      Thank you for commenting! And you are a polite commenter - something rare here on the internet ;)

  • @tigereyemusic
    @tigereyemusic 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I used to live in Aberdeen as a student. Because of all the granite buildings (it's known as the Granite city) the background gamma radiation is somewhere around 40% higher than the rest of the country.

  • @Xathian
    @Xathian 8 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    "These are considered safe for food. Just avoid acidic foods and drinks"
    Or just use a normal bowl where there is no "just avoid" attached on to it.

  • @ThePONITROX
    @ThePONITROX 9 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Where do you store these "Radioactive Stuff" ?

  • @Coyote0874
    @Coyote0874 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    You’re delusional, it was obviously 3.6 Roentgens, get him out!
    I’ll leave now

    • @anaana-on7rb
      @anaana-on7rb 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      not good, not terrible

  • @JustSomeGuy489
    @JustSomeGuy489 9 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Ironic, everyone is so scared of radioactivity, they don't even realize they encounter radioactive objects in their daily lives.
    You've just got to stop worrying and love the bomb, is what I say.
    Oh and, what's that ominous music you used? I recognize it... S.T.A.L.K.E.R.?

    • @trippybruh1592
      @trippybruh1592 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Found the Children of Atom follower 🤣

  • @ad-ik1893
    @ad-ik1893 8 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    HOLY CRAP! I'm from Czech Republic.. and right now I'm like super scared to touch any rock in the nature here. 😄

    • @peterbucek2136
      @peterbucek2136 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ja taky

    • @Chan-minion
      @Chan-minion 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can’t find radioactive rocks in Ohio, Usa

  • @Harlequin314159
    @Harlequin314159 9 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I would love to hear what kinds of saftey precautions you take with storing and handling these samples? Is it not very necessary (I notice the bare hands). Is there any risk to repeated handling and or storing them near your for long periods?

    • @MarkRose1337
      @MarkRose1337 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You should wash your hands with soap after handling them. Uranium is about as chemically toxic as lead. Our bodies evolved with uranium in the environment and we're able to excrete it, but large amounts are still a concern. For the most part, besides avoiding contamination with dust, the two precautions are to keep it some distance away from where people spend considerable time (the radiation rate decays with the square of the distance), and to keep it in a well ventilated area (outside, basically) to avoid a radon build up indoors (radon is more of a risk because it gets inside the lungs). His collection is radioactive enough that he can probably detect it from several meters away. A "safe" distance is about when the dose rate falls below 1 µSv/hr. You can shorten the distance with shielding (basically, any mass), but it's not necessary when distance will do.

    • @Liam8488
      @Liam8488 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Another thing to keep in mind is that alot of radiation is stopped by our skin. So being near radioactive materials like this for a few minutes won't kill you. What's extremely dangerous is when radioactive materials are dispersed in air or water. If we were to breath or otherwise ingest radioactive materials we wouldn't have our skin to protect us

    • @MarkRose1337
      @MarkRose1337 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Liam8488 The skin only protects against alpha radiation. It does nothing to protect against beta or gamma radiation.

    • @Liam8488
      @Liam8488 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mark Rose
      Beta radiation isn't nearly as damaging relative to Gamma or Alpha as far as I understand.due to the radically lower mass of electrons. I think my point still stands that consumed radioactive materials are radically more dangerous than ones sitting on a table or something

    • @nichtdiemama11
      @nichtdiemama11 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      A single flight from New York to Los Angeles exposes you to about 40µSv, so you could probably play with these samples every day without being in any danger.

  • @vlogealtraroba....2216
    @vlogealtraroba....2216 8 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    Naaah...My socks emit 500 000 millisieverts/hout

    • @mechalinkergaming7169
      @mechalinkergaming7169 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +VLOG e altra roba.... Wow. Can be used as a nuclear bomb.

    • @sloppypotato00
      @sloppypotato00 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Throw it to china

    • @C-MC_Gamer
      @C-MC_Gamer 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +VLOG e altra roba.... heh. you think YOURS are bad? i tested mine and they were 14,000,000,000,000 Microsieverts/hour!

    • @vlogealtraroba....2216
      @vlogealtraroba....2216 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +MCPE Manu_ Beh....Non so.Se vai a cercare "Bionerd" il tuo "standard" si alzerá.È incredibile quante radiazioni sopra la norma possiamo ricevere senza conseguenze.E poi quest i non sono materiali con radioattivitá seria.Se guardi il canale di Bionerd,ha trovato a Chernobyl un pezzetto di carburante del reattore esploso per terra,e se lo tiene in camera da letto,anche se supera il limite dei misuratori.

    • @manuelbucci1591
      @manuelbucci1591 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +VLOG e altra roba.... Bionerd la conosco eccome...è da un po che non si vede aveva fatto anche la scintigrafia...non gli sarà andate molto bene

  • @DrKriegsgrave
    @DrKriegsgrave 7 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Who the hell sells radioactive necklaces!? D:

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  7 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      ...and they don't even inform the buyers about it. They're sold as beneficial for your health. Even for your pet... Welcome to 2016 :)

    • @Kurioismi
      @Kurioismi 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Brainiac75 thanks

    • @strawberryjam3670
      @strawberryjam3670 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Brainiac75 throwback to the 1800's

    • @AhnafAbdullah
      @AhnafAbdullah 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Personally, I think anything below 100 microsieverts/hour is not dangerous if you only hold it for a few minutes or hours
      And I'd quite happily wear that lavastone pendant, it's just like wearing a piece of granite

    • @matth23e2
      @matth23e2 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Richard Frank You'd have to absorb 126 days worth of radiation from it to die, but your body will heal itself before that. (from the 1.66 microseivents one)

  • @pvc988
    @pvc988 9 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    I was waiting for: "Warning! Hazardous radiation levels detected."

    • @nahman3810
      @nahman3810 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +pvc988 The warnings on the meter including "DANGEROUS BACKGROUND RADIATION" was clear enough to me.

    • @FagitSohn
      @FagitSohn 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Was that a Half Life reference ?

    • @Holeshot109
      @Holeshot109 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I was waiting for it to say "Get the fuck out!"

    • @theolddeus9672
      @theolddeus9672 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Subnautica?

    • @pvc988
      @pvc988 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Friday Harlowe :)

  • @colecolerobomaster
    @colecolerobomaster 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I find it funny that some people make a big deal over Brazil nuts when random stuff is more radioactive

  • @OscarScheepstra_Artemis_
    @OscarScheepstra_Artemis_ 9 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I don't know it it is really smart to make those radioactive lava samples pendant-shaped. Someone stupid enough might actually wear them.

    • @kagi95
      @kagi95 9 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Oscar Scheepstra people wear them to cure cancer... oh the irony...

    • @OscarScheepstra_Artemis_
      @OscarScheepstra_Artemis_ 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      kagi95
      Well, so this is really cool! :D

    • @chriss6356
      @chriss6356 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oscar Scheepstra alpha and beta particles are not harmful unless they are ingested or inhaled. these decays are almost always alpha or beta decay

    • @slugworth1987
      @slugworth1987 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Physics Only the device measures hard beta and gamma... no alpha is detected

  • @AzVidsPro
    @AzVidsPro 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    how to commit a crime with radioactive shit.
    1. Give your victim the lava rock pendent as a present.
    2. AND BOOM CHECK IT OUT PRETTY AMAZING HEH?

  • @vantalane
    @vantalane 8 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    use Rad-x dude :)

    • @0Synergy
      @0Synergy 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      that shit is real Nasa is working on it, but I think it works like rad-x and rad away

    • @drpepperoverdose
      @drpepperoverdose 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I need some stampaks because of this comment..

    • @RelevantRhythm
      @RelevantRhythm 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Scrolled down to find this!!

  • @ShadowHackerCZ
    @ShadowHackerCZ 9 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    Czech Republic for the win!
    I'm just kidding.
    Or not.

    • @slahous
      @slahous 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Shadowhacker Yeah i live in most radioactive county propably :-D

    • @platypuschallenger
      @platypuschallenger 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Shadowhacker Don't be mean to my neighbour country D:
      jk dont take srsly

    • @ProWajxxx
      @ProWajxxx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Slahous já nevěděl že žiju v Černobylu 0.o

    • @slahous
      @slahous 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      :-DD

    • @a.iwanov1574
      @a.iwanov1574 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MichalH What is your neghbour country?

  • @chaoticchris8924
    @chaoticchris8924 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Word has it that Keemstar emits 174991748293.29kGy/h of radiation.

    • @Aleksander-cc7jm
      @Aleksander-cc7jm 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      WoW i didn't knew that MeeMStar can cause cancer o.o

    • @chaoticchris8924
      @chaoticchris8924 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Painis Cupcake It's true!

    • @chaoticchris8924
      @chaoticchris8924 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** Sometimes I touch myself.

  • @Al3311998
    @Al3311998 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    So if the pendant is dangerously radioactive, I can't see how keeping it right on your chest would be in any means safe..

  • @magicstix0r
    @magicstix0r 8 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    "...it's tiny, but still has a larger, more sensitive geiger tube..."
    .... That's what she said ...

  • @thelamb288
    @thelamb288 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Before you mentioned it, I thought; "How the hell can people sell radioactive pendants?". Prefect example of greed, no matter what the cost to others!

  • @mrkiky
    @mrkiky 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    How radioactive is that rock?
    It says 320uSv/h but that's as high as the meter goes...
    Ah! 320. Not great, not terrible.

  • @julien4097
    @julien4097 8 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    A normal day in Braniac's life xD

  • @aristeas28
    @aristeas28 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How did you keep yourself safe from the Radiation? Or is it safe for linited periods of exposure?

  • @alkistihara3188
    @alkistihara3188 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have a question:
    Since the counter detected dangerous amounts of radioactivity in some samples isnt it dangerous for your health too?

  • @TheCluelessAF
    @TheCluelessAF 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My question to you sir, why the hell you keep radioactive material in your home?

  • @blackvalley007
    @blackvalley007 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Last year at our school we had to test some radioactive material, shit got scary when the gauger counter still counted around 1600 uSv/hour even when there was 6cm of leadplate between it and the source.(source itself counted over 3400 uSv/hour)

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      blackvalley007 Wow, what kind of school/university is that? Sources with that activity are to my knowledge not common among pupils :)

    • @blackvalley007
      @blackvalley007 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's a school in holland called bernardinus, tough it was a yearly event of an university, since it is prohibited for a school to have such materials laying around.

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      blackvalley007 Ah OK, that makes sense to me. I would also be careful when handling sources with millisieverts/h :)

    • @shadic187
      @shadic187 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Holy shit, your school got a mini nuclear plant in a box? A LEAD box?

  • @luismauersberger2797
    @luismauersberger2797 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I live in Saxony, Ore Mountains from where you got the Pitchblende and in my town there are a lot of mines but they are all closed in cause of radioactive ores/materials.

  • @johnSmith-cg2ys
    @johnSmith-cg2ys 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    your videos are always a treat

  • @AwesomeGamesShow
    @AwesomeGamesShow 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank god this came up in suggested videos, I couldn't help but keep watching race crashes.

  • @aflappincod
    @aflappincod 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Could you perhaps put these figures into context in terms of how dangerous some of these items could potentially be?

  • @techsbyglebbagrov7470
    @techsbyglebbagrov7470 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    4:10 I love how the geiger counter is already beeping in fear

  • @GiorgioCapocasa
    @GiorgioCapocasa 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A very engaging and beautifully narrated video. Thank you for sharing this stuff with us!

  • @PabloLeautaud1
    @PabloLeautaud1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Really interesting video! Definitely subscribing to your channel… Two questions: Can the SOEKS detector display counts per minute (CPM)? And also, what is the font you used for displaying the mineral’s names and formulas? It’s beautiful!

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you :)
      No, the Soeks cannot display CPM. The Gamma-Scout can (CPS or accumulated counts in a given period).
      The font is called Lao UI.

  • @Fyralism
    @Fyralism 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    What is the most radioactive thing in the body naturally?

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      +TheGamerOfSamness (Evarderp)
      Potassium-40 has some hard gamma radiation. More info: hps.org/publicinformation/ate/faqs/faqradbods.html

    • @AZEMBadlen
      @AZEMBadlen 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bananas have Potassium-40

    • @vlogealtraroba....2216
      @vlogealtraroba....2216 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      A penis?(Maybe?)

    • @AZEMBadlen
      @AZEMBadlen 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You are funny. But no

    • @Fyralism
      @Fyralism 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what is the deadliest thing naturally in the body

  • @fabiomilazzo7467
    @fabiomilazzo7467 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Who is watching this in 2016?

  • @stivep1
    @stivep1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good work, nice presentation but.. there is a problem.
    Your video is misleading. Both instruments show numbers, and numbers only. You could make anyone of them show Fukushima inside the reactor while it does not exist at more than low sample level of say Cs-137. The answer is Calibration of whatever we use as nuclear decay energy detector or to be more accurate nuclear activity detector.
    The only limitation with how big is the error is sensitivity of the detector.
    I love your videos, thank you for your work. It is my preoccupation on a daily basis.
    Wesley

  • @agentwot7646
    @agentwot7646 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Where do you buy your mineral samples? Thanks for the video!

  • @synicyst9925
    @synicyst9925 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am looking to buy a reliable Geiger counter because I live on top of a mass of hot granite and have several defunct thorium and uranium mines in the neighbourhood. I have been told that even our well water contains uranium and radon. The strange thing is that people around here also live to great old age.

  • @CZDrMike
    @CZDrMike 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I live in the Czech Republic :)

  • @AttilaSVK
    @AttilaSVK 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video made me wondering if the 33x45x5cm "Viscount White" granite slab underneath my record player is radioactive, and if, how much.

  • @eliasihalainen03
    @eliasihalainen03 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How did you get that radioactive material 🇫🇮🇫🇮🍪

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I bought it. Search eBay or dedicated mineral webshops :)

    • @eliasihalainen03
      @eliasihalainen03 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Brainiac75 Okay :) Thank you for anwsering to my comment many big you tubers dont even read my comments so thank you :)

    • @TelgeProductions
      @TelgeProductions 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Could you provide a link?

  • @ektoras_fl4943
    @ektoras_fl4943 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yeah my cooking has like 900sieverts per second

  • @OtherworldJudge89
    @OtherworldJudge89 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What would happen if you put your radiation detector thing in a microwave and turned it on?

    • @OtherworldJudge89
      @OtherworldJudge89 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm also aware that radioactivity and microwaves aren't necessarily the same thing lol.

    • @johannesvahlkvist
      @johannesvahlkvist 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Borka223 im fairly certain it detects alpha too, but yea

    • @GoddardsJournal
      @GoddardsJournal 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      johannes the stalking biscuit only if it has a mica window, thin enough to allow alpha particles in. I believe the SOEKS in this video does not have one.

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Microwave radiation is non-ionizing so a geiger counter doesn't detect it. But it would probably fry/melt the electronics so don't do it :)

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** Yes, geiger counters are usually quite far from the full story unless you are measuring a Cesium-137 sample. I would get a higher reading if the samples were 'unpacked' and measured including alpha radiation. But with an energy-compensated scintillator I think most samples would score a lower reading.

  • @diesellight6204
    @diesellight6204 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video, but is it really safe touching these with your bare hands?… I mean, these things could contaminate your hand and give you long time exposure…that's not good for the system

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +陈厚邻
      You won't believe how much I wash my hands when handling radioactive samples :)
      It is a good idea to wear gloves. I actually don't handle the large, strong pitchblende samples with my hands. I use a 'trash grabber'. This lowers my recieved dose, and uranium is also a heavy metal that could give heavy metal poisioning...
      Thanks for watching!

  • @jackreoh
    @jackreoh 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    THIS VIDEO SCARED THE LIVING HELL OUT OF ME

    • @phantomchaser6210
      @phantomchaser6210 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lore it's the background music

    • @benbaselet2026
      @benbaselet2026 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      People tend to fear what they do now know about.

  • @Sypaka
    @Sypaka 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Back in the days, where they made glass from Uran. Aside from having radioactive material embedded, those glasses are really nice to look at under UV light.

  • @jaimebenito620
    @jaimebenito620 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It's great to see you're making super-interesting videos again!

  • @SetagayaObserver
    @SetagayaObserver 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Konban Wa, just saw it and want to inform you that Fukushima Daiichi is now open for Tourgroups: www.insidejapantours.com/japan-news/3723/new-magazine-focuses-on-dark-tourism-sites-in-japan/

    • @donewiththeinternet
      @donewiththeinternet 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      but that place is less radioactive then the necklaces in the videos.

  • @mariusa5754
    @mariusa5754 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How do you store your radioactive samples?

    • @unclemozart6129
      @unclemozart6129 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Marius Ammann behind Iron bars well that is what i would do

    • @peterbucek2136
      @peterbucek2136 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Gandalf Bruh Lead bars at least

    • @unclemozart6129
      @unclemozart6129 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      iron? defuq i talk lead yes iam sorry m888

    • @ravenbil4221
      @ravenbil4221 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bars? You know it's not a prisoner right? It can go through the gap in the bars lmao. Surely a lead box would be better?

    • @shadic187
      @shadic187 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The fridge.

  • @timlipinski2571
    @timlipinski2571 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video ! Other samples to add to your collection are the sensor from an old smoke alarm, welding rod with 2% thorium and maybe old glow in the dark clocks or instruments from pre WW II or The Great War to end all wars... Have you been to the Trinity Site ? And 2015 was the 70th year with a big turn out in the Spring Open House. Used to play at the old Argonne site where CP-2 and CP-3 are buried. CP-3 was the First Working Heavy Water Reactor ! The German design was to small and needed to be three times larger to work. And think that a young woman from Poland started all the work on radiation and was the first woman professor and taught at a French University. Thank you, tjl

  • @ferencs.harmat7049
    @ferencs.harmat7049 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This man wants to die

  • @Nipunsayswtf
    @Nipunsayswtf 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great video! Thanks for sharing!!! I'm gonna buy one of these radiation measurement things and check my dinnerware in case any stuff at my home is radioactive too. Those pendants and dinnerware sets should be clearly labeled as radioactive! It's kinda scary!!!

  • @benceee1204
    @benceee1204 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bionerd just signed your hat! Dude, that's so cool! I watched her videos about Chernobyl! She is a brave and great person!

  • @Filetrekker
    @Filetrekker 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think you need to add some context to the levels of radiation these things are giving out. The tool you're using seems to consider anything above 0.9 as dangerous, yet you're handling it without a care, so what is dangerous?

    • @megamario1392
      @megamario1392 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      FileTrekker If I'm right, that counter is made for measuring background radiations, so it's for long-term exposure. normally the normal amount we get usually for a year is 4mSv, this counter measure the number of uSv per Hour (i use ''u'' for micro),
      if we take his background exposure, its 0.13uSv/h, in one year you get 1.14 mSv a year, which is a low amount
      But at 0.9uSv/h, you get 7.88mSv, which is almost twice (4mSv) the normal dose
      one of the sample was 38uSv/h, in one year you get an impressive 332.88mSv, which is almost 7 time higher the max allowed exposed for one year (50mSv) of an Nuclear plant employee
      For the highest thing he tested, 4x320=1.28mSv/h, the one year dose is 11.21Sv, the deadly dose is 2Sv to 4Sv, il make you see how fast it goes up
      second: 0.35 uSv
      minute: 21.33 uSv
      Hour: 1.28 mSv
      Day: 30.72 mSv
      Week: 215.04 mSv
      Month: 921.6 mSv
      Year: 11.21 Sv
      there the image i used, which is reliable upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/20/Radiation_Dose_Chart_by_Xkcd.png
      So the fact he touch them for a short time is not dangerous at all, since the counter is for Long term measurements. Hope that helped

  • @ahadd100
    @ahadd100 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As always a really interesting video. I have never seen one that I didn't like. Thank you for making, them very informative.

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for watching :)

  • @ramikla_146
    @ramikla_146 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That might explain why I felt nauseous for no reason (this only occurred a few times within a decade)
    Touching things that we would not even think to be radioactive

    • @inductivelycoupledplasma6207
      @inductivelycoupledplasma6207 ปีที่แล้ว

      Won't be the cause. Exposure to low/ moderate amounts of radiation produces no acute symptoms

  • @robertdunaway-tyll7635
    @robertdunaway-tyll7635 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey I'm new to these types of videos and I'm curious how much radiation would be a lethal dose, or how much would actually affect you?

  • @project-326
    @project-326 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @Brainic75, I'm glad that you now have the Radiacode device, but that said, lots of people went out and purchased the Gamma Scout because they saw it on your channel. The gamma scout is a totally horrendous product, and even now get sales revenue for this snake oil. FYI, I just did a review on my channel about that horrible product.

  • @featheredfan
    @featheredfan 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great, the dogs will be happy to know that the quality of the material is very important to the dog owners! Are those lava souvenirs from your island vacations haha? Are they popular in Europe? Japan is in such a state, I don't even want to say... It is interesting that they turned Chernobyl into a tourist trap. Have you heard about the radioactive wild Boars? They like the Truffles, yum! Please, can you test the mushrooms and maybe some soil samples? Thanks

  • @Squeaky_Ben
    @Squeaky_Ben 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Any recommendations for geiger counters? I would like one

  • @knollebolle8802
    @knollebolle8802 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    der GAMMASCOUT hat das messfenster vorne an der stirnseite und kann deshalb die werte nicht richtig messen wenn sie das gerät mit der unterseite auf den zu messenden gegenstand legen!

  • @cometchris1090
    @cometchris1090 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You should make a video where you test and show things that are radioactive or emit radiation that we may have or use on a daily basis. Like what you did with the dog tag and the set of dishes.

  • @weirdmeisterinc
    @weirdmeisterinc 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    why the gammascout jumps to zero at the 320µsv piece? (at 10:10) thats not normal, its not too much for that device (when its too much it shows "overflow")
    maybe there is something wrong with the tube voltage regulation, it needs to rise the voltage at higher counts

  • @SaMaknae
    @SaMaknae 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    5.00 Is the radiation used in Xray's 37? Run. xD

  • @GoPnIK_1
    @GoPnIK_1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    HOLY FUCK IS ME IM FROM CZECH REPUBLIC.

  • @BensoftMedia
    @BensoftMedia 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    So as most of these came under "Dangerous Radiation" levels, where do you store them? Away from your house?

    • @gooscarguitar
      @gooscarguitar 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Ben J
      Alpha radiation is stopped by only a sheet of paper and has a range of only a few centimetres in air. Beta radiation is a bit stronger, so maybe some of the samples are in a lead box.

  • @BBadCraft
    @BBadCraft 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Too much radiation. We'll have to go around.

  • @GRVProductions
    @GRVProductions 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is that one made into a necklace!!?? Here buddy I got you a necklace keep this by your heart, always. :P

  • @nataliee103
    @nataliee103 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've never worked with these nor have I had an interest but, isn't it dangerous for you to be around some of them?

    • @the_mentaculus
      @the_mentaculus 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      For short periods, it is not dangerous to be around sources with that dosage rate. To give you some perspective, lets say the max dosage rate of one of these samples is four times the max of 320 uSv/hr that he detected. That ends up being about 1.3 mSv/hr. The dosage from a CT scan can be about 7 mSv. So the brief exposure of handling these sources isn't a major cause for concern. You would NOT want to carry it around in your pocket with you though.
      If you carried a sample so that part of your body was exposed to 1.3 mSv/hr all the time, 24/7 for a whole year, that part of your body would receive about 11 Sv over the course of the year. That's about 3000 times the amount of ionizing radiation your body experiences over the course of a year from natural sources. That's not a dosage you want to receive.

    • @Asasiene23
      @Asasiene23 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      the thing is that most of the particals are beta and Alpha, as long as they are Not inhaled they wont Do shit, they only particals that are very dangerous are gammar particals, but those are normally Not in things we have in normal live.

  • @todkapuz
    @todkapuz 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    to the end question... Interestingly Fukushima is already starting to draw tourists to the ghost towns. had I had more time I would have liked to visit myself... maybe my next trip.

  • @joshuafelty6779
    @joshuafelty6779 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the music you use for this, kind of has a dark feel to it. :)

  • @marialiyubman
    @marialiyubman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chernobyl is a tourist destination, but Chelyabinsk is still open to live and no one knows what happened in Krasnoyarsk because they turned off the Geiger counters...

  • @sandtheneet_
    @sandtheneet_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    heh... ...what a strange feeling when i noticed many of this stuff is from my country...

  • @Nguagemaster
    @Nguagemaster 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it dangerous to wear a radioactive pendant like that if its not exposed to your skin?

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      +Nguagemaster
      Well, for a few hours once in a while you have to be very unlucky to be hurt by these pendants.
      But the gamma rays from these will go through clothes, skin etc. so you need a thick layer of for example lead to actually shield the radiation at a short distance.
      My advice is that you never wear these pendants. There are a lot of nice, non-radioactive pendants to choose from :)

    • @0Raik
      @0Raik 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +brainiac75 but...will they give me superpowers?

  • @sciencoking
    @sciencoking 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The uranyl acetate struck me. I was not aware soluble uranium compounds were available for purchase.

    • @sciencoking
      @sciencoking 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** Labs are definitely going to have it, sure, but it seems like he got it as a private buyer, which is what made me curious. I've been trying to synthesize uranyl nitrate for display over an ultraviolet LED, but struggling to isolate the uranyl.

  • @brandonfireking7655
    @brandonfireking7655 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i found this same Geiger counter on a forum from a man who goes to Chernobyl for his birthday, he used it for checking radiation in the areas he visited, so it was neat to see you using it as well knowing that the russian military who helped him into the zone also used it for visitors

    • @brandonfireking7655
      @brandonfireking7655 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Brandon Fireking actually i believe its Ukrainian military, my bad

  • @gustavogodoy9626
    @gustavogodoy9626 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shouldnt you put something against... idk. Dangerous radiation?! Remember what happened to Marie Curie :v

  • @Minecraft12257
    @Minecraft12257 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bought another motor oil and it didn't spike. Should I add more Fe3O4 or should I try geting magnatec oil (it is hard to get in my area)

  • @Alfetto8
    @Alfetto8 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's interesting but 50usv/h is not THAT much. A normal radiography is almos 1 mSV and 1 mSV= 1000 usv.
    Furthemore deadly effects reach the body with 3 or 4 SV where 1 SV = 1000 mSV = 1.000.000 usv.
    Of course that's still terrible for a necklace because of the continuous exposition

  • @gameoverwehaveeverypixelco1258
    @gameoverwehaveeverypixelco1258 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How can they legally sell those pendents.

  • @gpowerdragon9852
    @gpowerdragon9852 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    House full of the Elements free cancer for everyone ringing the The doorbell to enjoy a cup of tea with iodine 😊 Japanese sushi yes please😀

  • @GLITCH_-.-
    @GLITCH_-.- 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hm. Crappy devices. The GQ GMC 300+ costs lot less and is not out maxable. I have a uraninite sample that gives over 87k cpm - although because I recently modded the GMC, I don't know the ySv/h value, but who cares? It's not Very useful anyway.

  • @Eden_GT
    @Eden_GT 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is that ionising pyramid even called that I couldn't seem to find online anymore? Now watching this I remember that my mom had a bigger size than that depicted in the video and had it put at the corner of our bedrooms for years. Didn't really expect to know that in the past I've been living with higher than background radiation for sure.

    • @lennihaapala8169
      @lennihaapala8169 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      inverse square law should lower the exposure a lot if you sleep on the other side

  • @gillianwallace3781
    @gillianwallace3781 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello. i am not gillian walace, but do have a question... How do i calculate the radiation compared to backround radiation.
    For example: if the avrage backround usv/h is 0.10 and the radiation fron my sample is 37.0, how much would i be exposed to radiation, and how would i calculate it, with like, a calculator.

  • @dominykaszakrys3373
    @dominykaszakrys3373 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    400 grams pitchblende radioactivity is approx. ~50 mSv/h so if i were you, i would rather place that mineral and geiger counters with 1m long pinchers cuz its definetely not safe to be that close to 400 grams pitchblende, or even worse touch it with your hands. i mean, 50 mSv/h is definetely nothing to worry about for sure, but it could already make you throw or at least give you strong headache for sure

  • @northernskies86
    @northernskies86 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not sure about you but those pendants made me very mad. They claimed it uses so-called 'negative ion technology', which is pseudoscientific bullshit by the way, and claimed all these false health benefits while exposing you and your pets to high levels of ionizing radiation. Seriously, it should be illegal to advertise something dangerous as being 'good for immunity.' However, I am not a radiophobe either, but it really pisses me off when people sell this to gullible people who buy this stuff thinking it will help them even though it is just exposing them to unnecessary amounts of ionizing radiation, which is bad for your health.

  • @LordCaledonFraszer
    @LordCaledonFraszer 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    One thing that always sticks my mind about nuclear fuel rods and such is that the half-life of uranium 238 (i.e. the time necessary for half the material to break down and become non hazardous) is several million years. Moreover, there is no practical way to recycle or dispose of spent fuel rods, you can only store them away. The "elephant foot" reactor slag at Chernobyl will be lethally radioactive for as long as humans walk the Earth.

  • @MrMattsung
    @MrMattsung 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Would you recommend the Soeks 01m over the defender?
    I am looking for a portable geiger counter.

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I would choose the most modern one. Soeks 01m Generation 2 is better than the older Soeks Defender. But I would choose Defender over the original 01m (older).
      If I had to buy one today I would save up for the Soeks Prime (www.soeks-usa.com/compare/76/77/82/80?sort=product_name&setCurrencyId=3).

    • @MrMattsung
      @MrMattsung 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brainiac75 Does the Prime have better features than the 01m Generation 2? Apparently Soeks-USA on Amazon won't ship to my country :c There are other sellers though!

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      MrMattsung Yes, the Prime is an upgraded 01M G2. Faster, more sensitive, twice the battery life, able to switch to other units than microsieverts etc. More info here: www.soeks-usa.com/prime/
      It seems like the best buy to me. My Defender is getting quite outdated :/

    • @MrMattsung
      @MrMattsung 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Looks really good! Display looks great. What do you think about the Quantum?

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Quantum is really nice with better screen and dual geiger tubes. But at 40% higher price I'm not sure it's the best buy unless money is no object.

  • @Ag89q43G0HyA
    @Ag89q43G0HyA 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would love to ask if you could check expensive stuff like: cosmetics, perfumes, food, computers, smarphones, jewlery. it would be amazing to know which make up is radioactive, because im sure they use variety of materials and in order to get colors they go for stuff that is unsafe, brands that i know, is jefree star, Anastasia, dior, tom ford

  • @brandonmartin8258
    @brandonmartin8258 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have collected and removed more than 600 lbs of pitchblende from my seven acre property. I live in Independence, Virginia. Pearisburg, VA is worse. I'm just glad that most of those rocks are directional.

  • @MarkRose1337
    @MarkRose1337 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very cool video! Those samples sure beat anything I have!

  • @kubikkq_
    @kubikkq_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im from czech republic thanks for use our radioactive ore (sorry for my english i know its bad)

  • @CzechNomad
    @CzechNomad 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, are you from Czech Republic ? because i just realised, that all radioactive minerals were from there .. actually I am from Příbram - city that your Uranium comes from .. we still have radiation naturaly there .. write me PM for more details if you are interested about radioaction, real uranium mining city .. etc ..