Bayt al-Maqdis is a sign of God's love and wrath, but how? | Khalid Mehmood Abbasi
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2025
- Bayt al-Maqdis is a sign of God's love and wrath, but how? | Khalid Mehmood Abbasi
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Khalid Mehmood Abbasi is a renowned Islamic scholar. He dedicatedly spent 30 years of his life with Tanzeem e Islami (Founded by Dr. Israr Ahmed R.A) and held key positions in Tanzeem during those thirty years. He is the only true successors of Dr. Israr Ahmad’s politico-socio-economic thought. Late Dr Israr Ahmad picked him into Shura of Tanzeem e Islami at the age of 30 years. He has delivered thousands of lectures and sermons on both secular and religious platforms. He is graced with Qur’anic wisdom, knowledge and insight into regional and international politics, philosophy, psychology, sociology, history, philosophy of history and revolutionary thought.
After leaving Tanzeem e Islami in 2018, He continued his struggle in establishing system of Social Justice. He played a key role in establishing "SHUBBAN UL MUSLIMEEN” (a movement for the Revival of Political Islam). Currently he is serving as Head of Shura for “SHUBBAN UL MUSLIMEEN”. This movement derives its spirit and ideology from Dr. Muhammad Iqbal (Allama Iqbal), Maulana Maududi (R.A) and Dr. Israr Ahmed's (R.A) religious and social thought.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
►► 𝔽𝕚𝕟𝕕 𝕌𝕤 𝕆𝕟 𝕊𝕠𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕝 𝕄𝕖𝕕𝕚𝕒
#khalidmehmoodabbasi #nwaastudios #islamiclecture
👉 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐓𝐔𝐁𝐄
☑️ Khalid Abbasi Short Clips
/ khalidabbasishortclips
☑️ Khalid Mehmood Abbasi Official
/ khalidmehmoodabbasioff...
☑️ Nwaa Studios
/ nwaastudios
☑️ Nwaa Studios Shorts
/ @nwaastudiosshortclips
☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲
👉 𝐅𝐀𝐂𝐄𝐁𝐎𝐎𝐊
✔️ Khalid Mehmood Abbasi
/ khalidmehmoodabbasioff...
✔️ Nwaa Studios
/ nwaastudios
✔️ NWAA Studios Videos
/ nwaastudiosvideos
☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲☲
👉 𝐖𝐄𝐁𝐒𝐈𝐓𝐄𝐒
⭐️ Shubban-ul-Muslimeen
www.shubban.com/
الحمد للہ
آپ کی تقاریر اور ان کے موضوعات بڑے زبردست وضاحت اور بہترین انداز میں پیش کرتے ہیں۔جو اسانی سمجھ میں اتے ہیں اور ذہن نشین ہوجاتی ہیں۔
ماشاء اللہ
اللہ اکبر
Need more updates on palestine
Jazakallah
❤❤❤
MashAllah Khalid Mehmood Abbasi such a informative Vlog
جناب خالد صاحب برائے مہربانی ہمیں سمجھائیں کہ حماس کے بارے میں آپ کا کیا موقف ہے
❤️👌👍
Servival fitness کا نظریہ عنایت اللہ مشرقی کا ہے
Nahi bhai , survival of the fittest ki theory Charles Darwin ny di thi , 1858 Mai ، apni book "origin of species" ky ander.
8:39 You are joining 21:95 and 21:96, why? It makes more sense to join 21:96 and 21:97 as it depicts the end of times era i.e. when Yajooj and Majooj are let loose is the era when the promise of end of times is about reached. Here are the reasons why 21:95 is not Jerusalem. 1. Jerusalem was never mentioned by name in 21:95. 2. Jerusalem is holy land and it was never destroyed. 3. Final release of Yajooj and Majooj is after return of Hazrat Esa pbuh which hasn't happened yet. 4. The unnecessary joining of 21:95 and 21:96 has no verb that says that the village shall return, it is a conjecture you are making which can be right or wrong, and in this case it is not right at all. Joining of 21:96 and 21:97 makes much more sense as it has continuation of subject rather than return of a destroyed village and in our case Jerusalem was never destroyed to begin with and it has always been populated by people and never completely empty, abandoned and inhabitable like other villages which were destroyed.
@user-rw3vz9vo3s The Hatta joins 21:96 and 21:97 and not 21:95 and 21:96. Imran Hosein didn't originally interpreted this. It was originally interpreted by Maulana Munazir Ahsan Gilani 80 years ago, probably before birth of Imran Hosein. Maulana Ahsan's interpretation is incorrect and therefore every one who Is using his interpretation is incorrect including Imran Hosein.
@user-rw3vz9vo3s it is a conjecture, a taweel which can be right or wrong because in the Hatta sentence it doesn't say the Qaryat will return. And rather the Hatta joins the next ayat which says that Final hour draws near. I can say the same thing about you that you understand Urdu and can't make that Hatta can be used used to join 96 and 97.
@user-rw3vz9vo3s First of all it is not Imran Hossein's analysis, it is the analysis of Syed Manazir Ahsan Gilani. He wrote this analysis in his book "Dajjali Fitnay ke Numaya Khud o Khal". Imran Hossein should have mentioned that he is basing his analysis from this book instead of portraying as his own. Syed Manazir Hussain was born in 1892 while Imran Hosein's DOB is 1942. Manazir Hussain came with this idea before Imran Hosein's birth. Secondly the analysis fails to address the clear words in Quran "Ahlakna" which means nothing but "Destroyed". Jeruslam was never destroyed because it is holy land. So 21:95 by no means talk about holy land of Jerusalm being destroyed by Allah's wrath like village of Lut, villag of Aad etc. You have to prove, not me, that Jersalem was destroyed by Allah's wrath because I know Jerusalem has never been destroyed by Heavenly punishment and always had population living in there. I have already described my points. Once you can look beyond your infatuation with personality i.e. Sheikh Imran Hosein, perhaps you would have examined my points with a clear mind.
@user-rw3vz9vo3sBro, its the truth. You are infatuated by personality which curtails your ability to look without bias. Ahlakna comes before Hatta, so we will go into Hatta once you have proved that Jerusalem as a village was destroyed so that it became in habitable like village of Lut, Aad, Samood. Therefore 21:95 does not refer to Jerusalem, before we even talk about Hatta. And I don't wish to go in loops, neither should you.
1:06:07
Assalam u alaikum sir itna din sa vedio nahiaye