So I finally learned that, using your explanation, thanks. Just a minor thing though: there is a typo on slide in time 7:50. The resulting value for f(1.75) is actually 15.8594 not 115.8594.
You mention the boundary conditions here, but only give the setup for Dirichlet boundary conditions (i.e. y(x_0) = c1, y(x_n+1) = c2 ) - could you also describe the process for working with Neumann (y'(x_j) = some value) and Robin (y(x_j)+y'(x_j) = some value) boundary conditions?
Were doing 1D finite difference method along the length of the reactor. Can I phone a smart friend? Your future president is getting creamed by the school right now!
Very informative video, especially showing the difference between the accuracy of mixed and constant high order accuracy methods.
So I finally learned that, using your explanation, thanks. Just a minor thing though: there is a typo on slide in time 7:50. The resulting value for f(1.75) is actually 15.8594 not 115.8594.
Great work
finally all makes sense. thanks for clear explanation
Great work, thank you! But you should seriously consider changing the "apocalypse siren" sound in the background...
I liked !
Yeah I also really liked it, it adds an apocalyptic ambience.
the music perfectly sync with the myth of finite deference method.
im on the verge of giving up
You mention the boundary conditions here, but only give the setup for Dirichlet boundary conditions (i.e. y(x_0) = c1, y(x_n+1) = c2 ) - could you also describe the process for working with Neumann (y'(x_j) = some value) and Robin (y(x_j)+y'(x_j) = some value) boundary conditions?
can't thank you enough for this.
Great lecture!!
Nice video. I enjoyed and liked it.
Were doing 1D finite difference method along the length of the reactor. Can I phone a smart friend? Your future president is getting creamed by the school right now!
Great video. Thank you!
Great video
Great work!
5:57 what happened there exactly?
❤
Hello! Is there a way we could send you an email?