Without wishing to be personal the deep rich cadence of the teachers voice makes this very interesting and easy to listen too over an extended time. That is often not the case at all. The detailed step by step expo is the clearest I have even seen.
@@stepbystepscience The term universe is very and increasingly overused. Everything has to be clearly defined and understood. Outer “space” is not to be referred to as SPACE. Gravity, as it has been written, is an interaction. It is fundamental. The term inertia is now redefined as “inertia/inertial resistance”. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Einstein never nearly understood physics/physical experience. Here are the facts. PRECISELY WHY AND HOW THE BALANCED, TOP DOWN, COMMON SENSE, SIMPLE, EXTENSIVE, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS PROVEN BY (AND CONSISTENT WITH) F=MA AND E=MC2: The following also CLEARLY explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. c squared represents a dimension of SPACE on balance WITH the fact that the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Indeed, the sky is blue; AND what is THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE (on balance) !! Consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c) (ON BALANCE); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is (CLEARLY AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). General Relativity is directly taken from Special Relativity. E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. I have exposed Einstein. Beautiful. Note: Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Think carefully about the black “space” AS WELL. Great. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, as BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THE EYE represents a two dimensional surface OR SPACE (ON BALANCE) that is consistent with F=ma AND E=mc2. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN/ON BALANCE. Consider what is necessarily, CLEARLY, logically, and by definition the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE ON/IN BALANCE. GREAT !!! Think about what is true/real QUANTUM GRAVITY !!! Great. Consider what is THE SUN. The sky is blue, and THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GREAT. E=mc2 IS F=ma. This explains the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. The gravitational “field” is E=mc2 as F=ma. Consider what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) on balance. Consider what is THE SUN ON BALANCE. I have explained why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. The sky is blue, and THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE. Carefully consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Consider what is the balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE. E=mc2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. That's the answer. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY and necessarily proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Get a good LOOK at what are the fully illuminated (AND setting) Moon AND the orange AND setting Sun. Consider what is the blue sky ON BALANCE. Lava is orange, and it is even blood red. THINK !!! SO, ON BALANCE, consider what are the tides !!! Excellent. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Accordingly, it ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense; as BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider what is THE SUN ON BALANCE. Think about what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE !!! GREAT !!! Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE !!! Wonderful. The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. The tides are CLEARLY and necessarily proven to be ELECTROMAGNETIC/gravitational ON/IN BALANCE, as E=mc2 IS F=ma (ON/IN BALANCE). By Frank DiMeglio
So, I am a retired advanced life support paramedic. Haven’t done physics in 30 years and am now working on a biomechanics degree. These videos have been a life saver for me!!!!
My teacher went over this for 2 hours (its a block class) and he only made me more confused! This step by step process is exactly how a teacher should teach a class! Thank you so much for helping me understand this!
i finally understood this tension breaking up components from watching your video.. was trying to figure it out for the past 2 days.. good thing i ran into this video of yours!! thanks a lot!
I swear to god, I'm so dumb. I hate myself. Sometimes I say things like "durr why iz dat number goin there hurr hurr". I'll do my best to ace my test though. If I do, I'll come back here tomorrow. Very, VERY helpful video. I can't thank you enough.
You are The Boss , I am glad to watch your video ,you are amazing and i understood everything, even though My English is not good enough , thank you very much , made my day
May i ask about how when you solve for T2 @ 7:51 you ended up with 0.58xT1 what confused me is why is the T1 there. Otherwise thank you for making these videos i really appreciate what you are doing sir.
T1 is there because you solve the previous equation for T2. When doing this you divide the cos 63 by the cos 38, that equals 0.58 and then multiply by T1. Does that help?
Does this apply to every task like this? I get the right result for this one when i try to recreate it but when i try to do my homework the same way i cant get it right.
Thank you Teacher, I would like to ask about a part of a question I saw in an IG textbook, the question starts as "A smooth bead is threaded on a light inextensible string, the ends of the string are attached to the ceilling, the bead is acted on by a horizontal force F and the bead is in equilibrium..... ", the point is that the answer assumes that the tension on both sides of the string are equal, why is this true? Thanks
Without wishing to be personal the deep rich cadence of the teachers voice makes this very interesting and easy to listen too over an extended time. That is often not the case at all. The detailed step by step expo is the clearest I have even seen.
Wow! That is an amazing comment. Thank you very much.
@@stepbystepscience The term universe is very and increasingly overused. Everything has to be clearly defined and understood. Outer “space” is not to be referred to as SPACE. Gravity, as it has been written, is an interaction. It is fundamental. The term inertia is now redefined as “inertia/inertial resistance”. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Einstein never nearly understood physics/physical experience. Here are the facts.
PRECISELY WHY AND HOW THE BALANCED, TOP DOWN, COMMON SENSE, SIMPLE, EXTENSIVE, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS PROVEN BY (AND CONSISTENT WITH) F=MA AND E=MC2:
The following also CLEARLY explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.
c squared represents a dimension of SPACE on balance WITH the fact that the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Indeed, the sky is blue; AND what is THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE (on balance) !! Consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c) (ON BALANCE); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is (CLEARLY AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE).
General Relativity is directly taken from Special Relativity. E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. I have exposed Einstein. Beautiful.
Note: Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Think carefully about the black “space” AS WELL. Great. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, as BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THE EYE represents a two dimensional surface OR SPACE (ON BALANCE) that is consistent with F=ma AND E=mc2. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN/ON BALANCE. Consider what is necessarily, CLEARLY, logically, and by definition the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE ON/IN BALANCE. GREAT !!! Think about what is true/real QUANTUM GRAVITY !!! Great.
Consider what is THE SUN. The sky is blue, and THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GREAT. E=mc2 IS F=ma. This explains the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental.
The gravitational “field” is E=mc2 as F=ma. Consider what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) on balance. Consider what is THE SUN ON BALANCE. I have explained why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. The sky is blue, and THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE. Carefully consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Consider what is the balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE. E=mc2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. That's the answer. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY and necessarily proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE).
Get a good LOOK at what are the fully illuminated (AND setting) Moon AND the orange AND setting Sun. Consider what is the blue sky ON BALANCE. Lava is orange, and it is even blood red. THINK !!! SO, ON BALANCE, consider what are the tides !!! Excellent. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Accordingly, it ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense; as BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider what is THE SUN ON BALANCE. Think about what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE !!! GREAT !!! Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE !!! Wonderful. The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. The tides are CLEARLY and necessarily proven to be ELECTROMAGNETIC/gravitational ON/IN BALANCE, as E=mc2 IS F=ma (ON/IN BALANCE).
By Frank DiMeglio
i just learned this in 10 minutes unlike my teacher who cannot teach correctly, this is the best video out there!
Thanks for the great comment. You can see a listing of all my videos at www.stepbystepscience.com
Dude, you are the bomb. You make us UNDERSTAND what we are doing vs just doing the work.
I try and thanks for the great comment.
THANK YOU YOU CLUTCHED UP FOR MY QUIZ TOMORROW
Awesome
So, I am a retired advanced life support paramedic. Haven’t done physics in 30 years and am now working on a biomechanics degree. These videos have been a life saver for me!!!!
Great and hope the new degree goes well.
My teacher went over this for 2 hours (its a block class) and he only made me more confused! This step by step process is exactly how a teacher should teach a class! Thank you so much for helping me understand this!
Step by Step science
i finally understood this tension breaking up components from watching your video.. was trying to figure it out for the past 2 days.. good thing i ran into this video of yours!! thanks a lot!
You have no idea how much your helping everyone out there including me. Thanks so much for the video. Please keep upload :)
Very nice of you to say, thanks for watching and commenting.
Physics final tomorrow and had no idea what static equilibrium was until 30 minutes ago. 3 videos later and I feel like an expert.
+Christine Copeman Excellent, thanks for watching and commenting.
You can see a listing of all my videos from my website at, www.stepbystepscience.com
wow ,actually this video tutorials help me solve a whole problem fluently ,am glad and impress,more grace
Thank you, glad to help.
much better than many videos on youtube. Especially the one listed on google.
Thank you. My Intro to Engineering book only had an example with one wire/cable being perfectly horizontal so this video helped out a lot.
Glad that the video helped. You can see a listing of all my videos at my website, www.stepbystepscience.com
thanks for teaching me in 10 minutes what my teacher couldn't in 54 minutes
The pleasure is all mine.
why is there no examples online that give you no weight
Now I have this knowledge for life! Can't spend it, can't lose it, unless I go Kuku.
Thank you this is a good refresher to prep for Statics.
After watching this, it felt like Physics is the easiest subject on Earth. This is really helpful. Thank you so much!
Thanks for the wonderful comment!
This is an excellent video that makes this so much more understandable.
Great that the video was helpful, You can see a listing of all my videos at www.stepbystepscience.com
Love your videos! They are very helpful!
Glad you like them! Thanks so much!
bless your soul sir
Thank you!
Thank you so much sir. I love your videos. You are clear and work step by step
Thank you. You made understanding the concept a possibility with practice. Well explained and clear steps
Great to hear! Thanks for the comment.
I swear to god, I'm so dumb. I hate myself. Sometimes I say things like "durr why iz dat number goin there hurr hurr". I'll do my best to ace my test though. If I do, I'll come back here tomorrow.
Very, VERY helpful video. I can't thank you enough.
Victor R and i oop-
Very concisely explained. Thank you!!!
THIS IS EXTRMELY HELPFUL. THANKS
THIS MAKES SO MUCH SENSE
thank you!
May GOD Bless You Sir and I wish I had you as my teacher
Thank you for the very nice comment.
Wow this is so straight forward 👏👏so impressed
So glad you like my videos. Thanks for the comment!
Simple and straight forward , thank you very much sir this video really helped me
So glad it was helpful, thanks for the comment
this video was a life saver! Thank you
You are very welcome. Thanks for the great comment.
Incredible. You made it click. Thank you so much!
Awesome, thanks for watching and commenting.
Thank you very much for making this video, it was very helpful as are the rest of your videos
Norwegian Wood Thank you very much for the positive comment, as you may have noticed this video was just posted yesterday.
thanks my grade 12 physics is slightly confusing!
you saved me thank you..very helpful and understandable
Excellent video thank you for creating this.
My pleasure, thanks for watching.
Thank you! This really helped me with my homework, cause it's quite confusing at first.😊
The video explains the concepts very well. I wish my physics instructors explained things as well as you do.
Thanks for the nice comment.
You can also see a listing of all my videos at my website,www.stepbystepscience.com
Thank you soooo much. Explained very well. And it helped that everything was typed and neat.
Thank you very much for the great comment, glad that you find the videos helpful.
Thanks for the help, this really helped me with my physics exam
Glad it helped! You're very welcome.
This is so helpful..I might actually pass my vectors test!!
Great hope the test goes well.
Very helpful Mister... really appreciate it :)
Very good presentation ,well specified it has helped me through ...‼️‼️🙏🙏🙏😊😊😊
Glad to hear that. Thanks for the nice comment.
wow, extremely easy to understand. Thanks
Glad to hear that! You're welcome.
thanks for teaching me in 10 mins. Finally able to understand the homeworks sually given by my teacher
Great that you found the videos helpful
You are The Boss , I am glad to watch your video ,you are amazing and i understood everything, even though My English is not good enough , thank you very much , made my day
Excellent, you are very welcome and thanks for the great comment.
thank you,it cleared my whole concept!.
Thank u bro u just clutched up my physics hw
That's excellent, you're very welcome.
Best videos ......salute
Thanks you very much!
Thank you! I understand!
Great explanation thank you very much
You are welcome, glad you liked it
thank you. this helped alot
May i ask about how when you solve for T2 @ 7:51 you ended up with 0.58xT1 what confused me is why is the T1 there.
Otherwise thank you for making these videos i really appreciate what you are doing sir.
T1 is there because you solve the previous equation for T2. When doing this you divide the cos 63 by the cos 38, that equals 0.58 and then multiply by T1. Does that help?
Yes sir it does,thank you very much.
Thank you so much, sir!!!!!This really helped me alot
You are very welcome, thanks for watching and commenting.
Very helpful!! thank you so much!
+Nicol Morales You are very welcome.
you can see a listing of all my videos from my website at, www.stepbystepscience.com
Also explain tension in a block on incline plane towards right and its weight acting die. And there is angle between normal force and tension
I love you so So much, thanks for this
You are very welcome.
Thank you! That helped :)
You're welcome!
i had a problem with this topic until I watched this video...thank you very much
You are very welcome, thanks for commenting.
Thank you
Thank u r an amazing teacher I love uuuuuu!!
Very nice of you to say, thanks.
thank you I'm appreciate in this solving how processes.
Welcome!
Clearly done!
Thanks for the comment
Thank you very much, good, nicely explained video
Thank you sir!
Your are very welcome!
Thanks, that was excellent!
You are welcome! You can see a listing of all my videos at my website, www.stepbystepscience.com
Thank you!
You are very welcome.
Very nice tutorial
Thank you very much.
well explained video.
Thank you.
Brilliant.
Very nice of you to say so!
thank you so muchhhh
You're welcome!
Thank you very much
You are very welcome and thanks for taking the time to comment.
thank you,very helpful 😀
Thanks for teaching me on Equilibrium physic in engineering in 10min unlike my teacher zzz
You are very welcome.
you save my day men! thanks a LOT!!!! :) petmalu
Thanks!!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!
Does this apply to every task like this? I get the right result for this one when i try to recreate it but when i try to do my homework the same way i cant get it right.
i love you man!
Thank you very much!
Thank yo this helped so much.
Wonderful
Thanks!
What if it swings in the Z axis, then what are the maximum and minimum tensions in each cable?
Wow, thank you so much. It was very helpfull.!
Thank u very much
You are very welcome
Sir which device do u use
Very simple....Apple MacBook Pro, presentations are made in Keynote and recorded with a program called ScreenFlow.
How could someone be so good at teaching? Is all of physics actually understandable and its maybe just the teacher who makes it hard? WELP.
A good teacher helps, and if the topics are broken down into small steps all the better. Thanks for the very nice comment.
Nice 😊
Thanks!
Holy, you're a god. Do you get paid for doing this, if not I gotchu
I don' get "paid" but I allow TH-cam to put advertisements on my videos. I get some money from that.
Thank you Teacher, I would like to ask about a part of a question I saw in an IG textbook, the question starts as "A smooth bead is threaded on a light inextensible string, the ends of the string are attached to the ceilling, the bead is acted on by a horizontal force F and the bead is in equilibrium..... ", the point is that the answer assumes that the tension on both sides of the string are equal, why is this true?
Thanks
Can you show what happen to the equations when the angle 63 and angle 38 are reduced to 0?
thank you very much sir
Why there is no force Normal in the y-direction?
Can you help me with some of my problems please Mr. Brian ?
I will subscribe and leave you you a nice comment too. Thank you very much for making this video and the other videos you make. They all are helpful.
Thanks for both!
You can see a listing of all my videos at my website, www.stepbystepscience.com
Ok. Thanks
what happens if like the ropes are in a corner and one is fixed on the wall past 180 degrees? How do you divide this in x and y components
Thank u so much!
You are very welcome!
In this question the angles are known..suppose the angles were not given then how to find the angles?( Mass is given)
on 8:31, i think it should be 2T1 becuase you added 2 Ts
May god bless u
He already has.
thank you sir for your wonderful explanation. but can i ask something? how can we determine if the system is whether a static equilibrium or not?
If all of the forces in the x-direction equal zero and all of the force in the y-direction equal zero then the system is in equilibrium.