Exercise Intensity as a Percentage of Maximal Heart Rate Example Calculations

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @countrymusicguitarclassics
    @countrymusicguitarclassics 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I learn so much from your channel and your videos. The presentation style is straight to the point and full of knowledge. Keep making these videos. I subscribed and learning everyday!

    • @VivoPhys
      @VivoPhys  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for the kind words.

  • @gregrogers3203
    @gregrogers3203 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you Dr Matthews! Very informative.
    Just what I was looking for, what range of % max rate HR is considered Vigorous exercise.
    Many thanks as well for linking to additional info.

    • @VivoPhys
      @VivoPhys  11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      77-95% American College of Sports Medicine, ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription 11th ed.

  • @hornet224
    @hornet224 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Formula 220-Age works good for me. Mine is 142. Riding a bicycle for 75 minutes @ 17.6 Kmh my HRM is 124 bpm maximum and my average is 99. I consider this moderate exercise and has no heavy breathing while still able to speak.

  • @rickycarfan54
    @rickycarfan54 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow… i just discovered your channel today and it is packed of super interesting video and content!
    my congratulation! 👏👏
    i’ll be surely gonna watch all of them!! 😊
    i would have a question thoug… what is the relationship between heart rate and calorie burned?? calorie burn are completely connected to heart rate or they depend on something else?

    • @VivoPhys
      @VivoPhys  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you. I'm glad to hear that you like my videos. Both heart rate and calorie burn rate will increase as exercise intensity increases. However, a precise formula from heart rate to calories burned would not be accurate because the rate of increase between those variables during exercise vary between people.

    • @rickycarfan54
      @rickycarfan54 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@VivoPhys got it. But anyway… would it be correct to say that the more your heart rate is high… the more calories you are burning?

    • @VivoPhys
      @VivoPhys  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Generally speaking yes, but you cannot compare between people and say that.

    • @rickycarfan54
      @rickycarfan54 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VivoPhys yes yes… it can be intended only in relatio to one person. I’m asking that cause sometimes i notice that for the same type of workout (or the same speed if for example i’m running outside) so for the same amount of “work” i have pretty different heart rate.. i mean same work out but one day the medium heart rage is 105, the other day the medium is 115 😓( this is pretty high for me… my max is 140 maybe. 135 i’m kinda about to die!!😅)
      so i just don’t understand how to read or interpretate this?! 😞

  • @cliftonparchment4498
    @cliftonparchment4498 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    awesome informative video

    • @VivoPhys
      @VivoPhys  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you.

  • @reginajohnson188
    @reginajohnson188 ปีที่แล้ว

    My max is 177 and my vigorous exercise is 141.9 - 159.45 so my number is not on the workout chart 📉📈 but I saw my max of 177 and I don't know what work out to do can you explain it in a video 📷 please

  • @shika-way
    @shika-way 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    New sub here. Hi I just checked ur vdo on harris benedict equation explanation..I have an enquery. If I'm calculating for an overnight person n not obese which equation is to be used and in the place where I should use the weight should I use the current weight or the target weight

    • @VivoPhys
      @VivoPhys  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi SHIKA- WAY. When unsure I would go with the Mifflin-St. Jeor equations. They are still suitable even for normal weight individuals. To my understanding they just aren't as commonly used. Below is a website talking about this a bit if you want to check that out.
      blog.nasm.org/nutrition/resting-metabolic-rate-how-to-calculate-and-improve-yours#:~:text=The%20Mifflin%2DSt%20Jeor%20formula,%C3%97%20age%20in%20years)%20%2D%20161
      As for what weight to use I would use the current weight. Then for weight loss you would need to calculate how many calories of reduction from that value make sense for their weekly goal. Remember 1-2 pounds (1kg) is as much as you can reasonably expect to loss each week without major side effects or major consequences for lean body mass. 1 pound of fat is 3500 kcal. All of these are just estimates. Once you see a week or two of adherence you can determine if you need to add back in or remove more calories based on the individuals actual progress.

  • @joynavalkar777
    @joynavalkar777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Too good thnx

    • @VivoPhys
      @VivoPhys  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad you like it.

  • @sajadmoradi9459
    @sajadmoradi9459 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    tnx dear dr

    • @VivoPhys
      @VivoPhys  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're welcome sajad moradi!

  • @littlevoice_11
    @littlevoice_11 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would the calculation be different if someone has a mild lung condition?

    • @VivoPhys
      @VivoPhys  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Little Voice. I believe the calculations would be the same. It is wise to consult your medical doctor first though.