Twelve years ago I went to a mid week church service with Dr. Sam Gipp as the guest preacher. At an intermission I spoke with Dr. Gipp and told him that I had been saved for 49 years and did not know Gods specific will for my life. He asked if I could read the Bible 25 pages a day? I said sure. He said you need to show the Lord you mean business. After 9 months the Lord showed me the job He had for me. (street preaching in cities near me every week) I have continued reading the 25 pages a day and it has transformed my life. I tell my kids, my grandkids and believers I meet every week. "read the Book, read the Book , read the Book!". There is nothing more important in life than reading that Book. The Monarch of books. Thank you Dr. Gipp. I'll see you on the other side!
While I agree that IS the best advice I will point out that the only places in the Bible we are commanded to study (II Tim 2:15)and search the scriptures (John 5;39)are removed in the new versions. Occurs only in the old AV 1611. If you ask the Lord to show the truth, He will.@@PaDutchRunner
@@thevulture5750 there’s probably a sense in which all of reality is mathematically encoded. God created a world that can be interpreted in multifarious ways, including via math.
Just my own anecdotal experience but the lord brought me to read the KJB for the first time 15years ago and I was never the same. Been reading other versions my entire life and they all fell flat and had little impact on my walk. Friends around my age (30’s) think it’s too difficult and outdated, but then I read it in our study time together and it just hits the heart differently.
This might be some of the most incoherent nonsense i have ever heard proposing to be a conversation about biblical schoarship. Unfortunately for Sam Gipp, presuppositions and indoctrination within a highly idiosynchtatic subculture has totally suplanted any notion of careful, study in any kind of spirit resembling humility. I'm enbarassed for him and the people that are attracted to this kind of intellectually dishonest dreck. Do better Sam.
That's the Holy Spirit. So many Christians are unwilling or unable to explain that they know the KJB is God's true word because the Holy Spirit convicts and inspires them to understand.
It's funny how people say the KJV is too hard to read and understand......then try to justify their new version by "learning Greek". 🤣🤣🤣 Hypocrisy at its best👍
@@KingjamesAV1611 Yup, idk how more people don't see that. Honestly people just tend to regurgitate what they are told by their pastor, parents, friends, favorite TH-cam "teachers" etc.
I read the NKJV because of John MacArthur. I read the NASB because of Hal Lindsey. I read the NLT because of Chuck Swindoll. I read the ESV because of my kids' Baptist AWANA program, until one day they looked up while reading and said, "Dad, why are verses missing?" After a year of study, I came to the conclusion that God did in fact keep his promise to preserve His word and that it is found in the King James Bible. Thanks to those few of you who stood up to deliver the truth: Sam Gipp, Gail Riplinger, David W. Daniels, Robert Breaker and Gene Kim.
Sam Gipp? A Russian must learn English to have the true word of God. Not any old English but the archaic English of the KJV.. Where so many words have changed meaning. Gail Riplinger? Pathological liar and deceiver. Her so called "acrostic algebra" which she claims God gave her. So a "new revelation not in scripture" typical of all false teachers. Nothing more than the spirit of divination or witchcraft. Just like this numerogy deception. David W Daniels? KJV only cultist from "chicktracts". Full of double standards, circular reasoning, conspiracy theories, and outrageous lies. Gene Kim? Blasphemer. Think that those who reject the KJV only heresy. Will bow the knee to him. What an arrogant presumptuous blasphemous false teacher. Robert Breaker? Who would not reply to me. When I exposed some of his lies he said about other translations. Translations that God is using and blessing to bring many to Christ. The heavens cannot contain the Almighty. But the idolatrous KJV only cult try to confine him to some imperfect uninspired translation called the KJV. The KJV translators knew their work was not perfect, they said that even the meanest translation is still the word of God. The KJV only cult in their delusions pride and arrogance think they know better. KJV onlyism one of Satan's most subtle deceptions. That has left sanity behind. Thank you Lord for the excellent modern more accurate translations you have blessed us with.
Sam Gipp? Gail Riplinger? David W Daniels? Robert Breaker? Gene. Kim? Five very good reasons to reject the KJV only heresy. Three other reasons are Will Kinney, Steven Anderson, Michael Hoggard. All teaching this KJV only insanity. Eight good reasons to avoid KJV only churches... After all if they teach this heresy, what other false teachings will they teach?
Before Christ I watched the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson...You are the Johnny Carson of the believers show! You are doing a great job having these guys come in and talk. You have a gift for getting them to open up. God bless you Brother. THANK YOU.
A circumstantial case for the Comma of John: In 484 A.D. the bishop of Carthage with 400 bishops quoted the comma to an Arian Vandal king. Being the bishop of Carthage, he would have had access to the Scriptures of Cyprian, and he probably had a Vulgate, maybe a first edition. Also, Gregory Nazianzus wrote on the grammar, and he had a student named Jerome. Seems strong evidence to me. Blessings.
Right on, Brothers - note that one of Dean John Burgon's forerunners as Dean of Chichester was the Orientalist William Thorne (1568 - 1630), who had a hand in translating the King James Bible.
@@aitornavarro6597 I knew where you going , that’s why I said that. You can claim all day there is no perfect translation til you turn blue. I know I have the perfect translation, KJV. You welcome! .
@@OmarGonzalez-gx1ks I read the KJV so your comment makes no sense. I simply don't believe translations are inspired like the originals were inspired. Languages don't equate 100% in translation therefore perfect translations are impossible although translations are nearly accurate.
@@RichardMaldonado Bart Erhman cannot give you hope, joy, love and peace. Bart Erhman does not have faith and is like the first century religious leaders in Jesus time
If the Byzantine manuscripts are preferred, why use a translation based on half a dozen of them instead of the majority reading of the 6,000 manuscripts? The Byzantine majority reading is much closer to the Alexandrian readings, than it is to the Textus Receptus.
may i ask if somebody used another version of the bible other than the KJV on witnessing a person then that person saved do you think that person really saved because he uses another version of the bible
It is not about the translation, but the message. Is Jesus the Son of God? Yes. Was he executed for our sins and rose on the 3rd day? Yes. Our we forgiven if we follow Christ and receive him as our savior as long as we repent and turn from our sins? Yes.
New Covenant Whole Gospel: Who is now the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary? What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. What brings all local churches together into one Body under the blood of Christ? The answer is found below. Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him. He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth. Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? What did Paul say about Genesis 12:3 in Galatians 3:8? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. 1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight. 1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment. 1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us. The following verses prove the Holy Spirit is the master teacher for those now in the New Covenant. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Mar 1:8 I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost. Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. Act 11:16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. 1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. 1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him. Watch the TH-cam videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.
@@shamusmcgee861 I do not reject the truth. The Father's word is truth. Jesus is the way the truth and the life. The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of truth. The three persons of the Godhead, in perfect unity. The KJV only heresy a man made tradition that has no scriptural support. In other words a false teaching and a damnable deception. Something that could not have existed before 1611.
@@shamusmcgee861 Should you not be asking me "am I for the Lord Jesus Christ or not"? Yes by God's grace I am a child of God because of what Christ did for me. Dying for my sin. By the grace of God I am on the Lord's side. If you mean am I going to bow down to the idolatry which is King James onlyism. A man made tradition without any scriptural support. Definitely not I was making perfect sense. What was it you did not understand?
13:40…”they would make copies if doctrinal verses…”. What proof do you have of this? It’s sounds good, plausible, but sounding good doesn’t make it true
the translation of the Hebrew Bible into Koine Greek, may have been produced at Alexandria, Egypt in stages, starting about 250 BCE. The Alexandrian community then included the largest community of Jews, including a group of scholars who prepared the translation. Codex Sinaiticus and codex vaticanus are the oldest manuscripts dated to mid 4th century AD compared to the more recent Majority text or received text. There are barely any differences in the various translations apart from sone contested verses (Mark 16:9-20) is an example. In the newer Bible translations those verses are still in there but with brackets stating these verses are not in the older or more reliable manuscripts) Nothing takes away from the Christian doctrine - in fact we now have an embarrassment of riches as far as manuscripts are concerned - These manuscripts 5,800 plus - do not differ in any substantial way apart from spelling mistakes or quotation marks etc. Even the KJV was translated and also has side notes. No-one is trying to get rid of the King James Bible - it is a beautiful translation with Elizabethan language - however it is difficult to read for today’s reader - and so it was updated to todays language in 1982 with the NKJV and then we have the NIV and ESV etc all translated with teams of over 50 scholars and PhD theologians and professors from around the world who were very careful to preserve the word for word text as much as possible (NIV more mixture of thought for thought and using critical text. The critical text and the Textus Receptus barely differ It is healthy to have different translations and to compare
Those are legit. Mark (forgot his last name), has some valid points if you actually listen to him. He never bashes the translation, but talks about how the English language has changed in the last 400 years. Words meant one thing when the KJV was translated. The same word as changed it’s meaning so when reading in the KJV we see it in our modern English when it meant something else 400 years ago.
Great subject, content and conversation....BUT...the man who is coughing is soooo distracting. Keep the mic away from incessant coughers....or excuse yourself from the table...
My elevator pitch: The KJB has the links in every chain from OT to NT using consistency in word usage, prophecy, mathematics and timing with respect to how it began its journey on the world stage. Consider: it came at the height of the reformation. It came at the birth of the English Empire. It survived the gunpowder plot of the Jesuits. And then I dare you to look at the lives surrounding the 4 Stuart's who were the kings of england at the time. Christ came to earth at the 4th prophetic day of the creation week. Mary was catholic beheaded by Elizabeth who was protestant. Elizabeth was the 'virgin' queen. Mary was James' mother. James was VI of Scotland, and I of England =7. Charles I beheaded, Charles II avenged, return of the KING. And many many more, not to mention the kangaroo court of Charles I who was king James I's son. Jesus was in a kangaroo court. Jesus will return to defeat all his enemies. I cant shorten this comment because that's all this is... just another comment. But I encourage everyone to look without trusting the Jesuit history revisionism that's going on in today's cancel culture, when it comes to whether or not you believe James was a Godly man...he was human right? Then he's not God on earth and he sins so is that going to make the whole bible a farce? I should hope not!
@@JPH4886 check out TRUTH IS is CHRIST'S channel He uses the pure bible software and finds other numeric patterns The word LORD is 1,769 times in 1st 5 books...take away Genesis and its 1,611 times
Codex vaticanus is bad because it was discovered in a Catholic library. The KJV translators used Erasmus’ greek printed texts, oops he was a Catholic and he got his manuscripts from Catholic libraries. The other translations use Wescott and Hort’s greek text, they don’t, they use Nestlé-Aland or UBS. Words like Lehi vs the jaw in Judges 16 Hallelujah vs Alleluia in Rev 19 Charity vs love for agape Calvary vs place of a skull (the latin is locum calvarium ie place of a skull) in Luke 22 Lucifer vs morning star in Isaiah 14 (Lucifer is the Latin word for you guessed it morning star) etc etc
Sam Gipp's teaching on Easter in Acts 12:4 is very flawed. He provides no evidence whatsoever that establishes an etymological link between Easter and Astarte. Alexander Hislop offers no evidence either for such a connection. Back in 1611 "Easter" was used interchangeably with "Passover" to refer to the Jewish feast. You would think one would do a bit of research into how particular words were used in 1611.
The Greek word behind Easter in Acts 12:4 is pascha. This word is found 29 times and translated in all other places as passover. Some KJV translators likes some words. Like charity for agape in 1 Cor. The most frequent occurrence of agape is in 1 John and not once translated as charity. The KJVO make a big deal about charity not being used in other translations. There are quite a number of others also.
The elephant in the room that no kjvonlyist will discuss honestly is, what about the known and obvious errors in the King James? With all due respect, I teach and preach from the KJV, but to say a translation - any translation - is perfect and without error is demonstrably false. For instance, there's no Easter in scripture. The word is pascha. It means passover.
The original Greek word is pacha, which would normally and rightly be translated as Passover, but in this case the KJB Translators knew that it was Easter, because those were the days of Unleavened Bread, which comes after Passover, so Passover was over, thus it has to be Easter.
@@paulflannigan888 Sam Gipp's answer book? Doing mental gymnastics to try and justify the mistranslation of Easter. Instead of the correct translation which is Passover . The KJV translators got it wrong. Ezekiel 45 v 21 makes it clear that Passover is a feast of seven days. Not that the KJV idolaters like Sam Gipp care about truth. Just the insane worship of an imperfect uninspired translation. Easter was not known when Luke wrote the book of Acts. Herod wanted to please the Jews that is why he was waiting till after the Passover. Other reasons to reject the KJV only heresy, besides Sam Gipp. Will Kinney, Steven Anderson, Mike Hoggard, Gene Kim, David W Daniels, Robert Breaker. All represent the lunatic fringe of the KJV only cult. Professional liar Gail Riplinger represents the extreme lunatic fringe of the KJV only cult. Her so called "acrostic algebra" alongside Mike Hoggard's numerology is the spirit of divination or witchcraft. So is heretic Gene Kim's and his blasphemous idolatrous teachings. As has been said Satan does not need atheists, he has the KJV only cult spreading his deceptions. Thank God for better more accurate modern translations, in English we can understand. Without all the added uninspired verses that are in the KJV.
We keep being told that all these revisions are made for readability. That's not the issue at all. The issue has never been readability. The issue is source documents. 3000+ source documents supporting KJV. Sometimes called majority text. The other versions, including NKJV, are supported by 50-70 supporting texts. Sinaiticus was actually pulled out of a garbage can. KJV was uncontested for 350 years. People who call people who defend KJV only a cult are a group who I would call the 'anything but the KJV' cult. Kjv is still 30% of Bibles sold. Next closest is nasb at 15%.
Ruckman was right ! Nobody has the originals and if you had them , what are you going to do with them ? The universal language is English not Greek , the King James Bible is superior to the original autographs- Ruckman was right
I AM KJV EXCLUSIVE - I BELIEVE THE KJV IS THE BEST TRANSLATION (IN ENGLISH) WE HAVE - I BELIEVE THE LORD GOD DID INDEED PERSERVE HIS WORD IN ENGLISH WITH THE KJV - *BUT* I DO *NOT* BELIEVE THAT THE KJV IS INSPIRED!!!!!!! BUT I WOULD LIKE TO ASK; *"WHICH PERSON, ON THE PANEL ABOVE, USES THE 1611 PUBLICATION OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE???!!!!"*
The translated text of 1611 is the same today. There were corrections of printing errors, a font change and standardization of spelling. The KJB is God's pure words perfectly preserved in English and therefore is inspired. The inspiration is in the words.
@@johnword4775 *INSPIRATION MEANS YOU START WITH A BLANK SHEET OF PAPER, THEN THE LORD GOD TELLS YOU WHAT TO WRITE ON IT - PLAIN AND SIMPLE!!!!!!!* THE KJV TRANSLATERS STARTED WITH A BISHOP'S BIBLE AND CORRECTED THE TEXT TO BETTER FIT THE MASEROTIC HEBREW AND THE BEZA'S 1598 GREEK TEXT - *THAT IS NOT INSPIRATION* - YOU ARE JUST A PARROT THAT KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT THE TRANSLATION OF THE KJV - BUT, I SHALL NOT PERSUE THIS IF YOU WILL JUST STOP TRYING TO POKE ME IN THE EYE, I WOULD NOT WANT TO BE THE ONE THAT SHATTERS ANY OF YOUR FAITH, AND I TOO LOVE THE KJV BIBLE - THE KJV BIBLE IS GOD'S WORD IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, THAT IS A GOOD STATEMENT, JUST STAY AWAY FROM THE WORD "INSPIRED"!!!!!!!
Twelve years ago I went to a mid week church service with Dr. Sam Gipp as the guest preacher. At an intermission I spoke with Dr. Gipp and told him that I had been saved for 49 years and did not know Gods specific will for my life. He asked if I could read the Bible 25 pages a day? I said sure. He said you need to show the Lord you mean business. After 9 months the Lord showed me the job He had for me. (street preaching in cities near me every week) I have continued reading the 25 pages a day and it has transformed my life. I tell my kids, my grandkids and believers I meet every week. "read the Book, read the Book , read the Book!". There is nothing more important in life than reading that Book. The Monarch of books. Thank you Dr. Gipp. I'll see you on the other side!
Wonderful!
As much as I disagree with him re: the KJV, his advice regarding reading the Bible is the best advice anyone could ever give anyone.
While I agree that IS the best advice I will point out that the only places in the Bible we are commanded to study (II Tim 2:15)and search the scriptures (John 5;39)are removed in the new versions. Occurs only in the old AV 1611. If you ask the Lord to show the truth, He will.@@PaDutchRunner
@@PaDutchRunnerThe KJV Bible is mathematically encoded.
@@thevulture5750 there’s probably a sense in which all of reality is mathematically encoded. God created a world that can be interpreted in multifarious ways, including via math.
Just my own anecdotal experience but the lord brought me to read the KJB for the first time 15years ago and I was never the same. Been reading other versions my entire life and they all fell flat and had little impact on my walk. Friends around my age (30’s) think it’s too difficult and outdated, but then I read it in our study time together and it just hits the heart differently.
This might be some of the most incoherent nonsense i have ever heard proposing to be a conversation about biblical schoarship.
Unfortunately for Sam Gipp, presuppositions and indoctrination within a highly idiosynchtatic subculture has totally suplanted any notion of careful, study in any kind of spirit resembling humility.
I'm enbarassed for him and the people that are attracted to this kind of intellectually dishonest dreck.
Do better Sam.
That's the Holy Spirit. So many Christians are unwilling or unable to explain that they know the KJB is God's true word because the Holy Spirit convicts and inspires them to understand.
It's funny how people say the KJV is too hard to read and understand......then try to justify their new version by "learning Greek". 🤣🤣🤣
Hypocrisy at its best👍
@@KingjamesAV1611 Yup, idk how more people don't see that. Honestly people just tend to regurgitate what they are told by their pastor, parents, friends, favorite TH-cam "teachers" etc.
@@brandonquintana7683 ....Amen brother 🙏
I read the NKJV because of John MacArthur. I read the NASB because of Hal Lindsey. I read the NLT because of Chuck Swindoll. I read the ESV because of my kids' Baptist AWANA program, until one day they looked up while reading and said, "Dad, why are verses missing?" After a year of study, I came to the conclusion that God did in fact keep his promise to preserve His word and that it is found in the King James Bible. Thanks to those few of you who stood up to deliver the truth: Sam Gipp, Gail Riplinger, David W. Daniels, Robert Breaker and Gene Kim.
Dr Ruckman is one of the biggest soldiers fighting against the corrupt bible scholars.
*Not one of those bibles is still Holy and not one of those ''men of God'' have any idea they're teaching from the now UNholy word of satan.*
Sam Gipp? A Russian must learn English to have the true word of God. Not any old English but the archaic English of the KJV.. Where so many words have changed meaning. Gail Riplinger? Pathological liar and deceiver. Her so called "acrostic algebra" which she claims God gave her. So a "new revelation not in scripture" typical of all false teachers. Nothing more than the spirit of divination or witchcraft. Just like this numerogy deception. David W Daniels? KJV only cultist from "chicktracts". Full of double standards, circular reasoning, conspiracy theories, and outrageous lies. Gene Kim? Blasphemer. Think that those who reject the KJV only heresy. Will bow the knee to him. What an arrogant presumptuous blasphemous false teacher. Robert Breaker? Who would not reply to me. When I exposed some of his lies he said about other translations. Translations that God is using and blessing to bring many to Christ. The heavens cannot contain the Almighty. But the idolatrous KJV only cult try to confine him to some imperfect uninspired translation called the KJV. The KJV translators knew their work was not perfect, they said that even the meanest translation is still the word of God. The KJV only cult in their delusions pride and arrogance think they know better. KJV onlyism one of Satan's most subtle deceptions. That has left sanity behind. Thank you Lord for the excellent modern more accurate translations you have blessed us with.
Sam Gipp? Gail Riplinger? David W Daniels? Robert Breaker? Gene. Kim? Five very good reasons to reject the KJV only heresy. Three other reasons are Will Kinney, Steven Anderson, Michael Hoggard. All teaching this KJV only insanity. Eight good reasons to avoid KJV only churches... After all if they teach this heresy, what other false teachings will they teach?
Before Christ I watched the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson...You are the Johnny Carson of the believers show! You are doing a great job having these guys come in and talk. You have a gift for getting them to open up. God bless you Brother. THANK YOU.
If he didnt do this, he'd be a comedian
A circumstantial case for the Comma of John: In 484 A.D. the bishop of Carthage with 400 bishops quoted the comma to an Arian Vandal king. Being the bishop of Carthage, he would have had access to the Scriptures of Cyprian, and he probably had a Vulgate, maybe a first edition. Also, Gregory Nazianzus wrote on the grammar, and he had a student named Jerome. Seems strong evidence to me. Blessings.
Pete Ruckman "do you have the word of God" timeless chalk talk!
And I'm not even Baptist.
Right on, Brothers - note that one of Dean John Burgon's forerunners as Dean of Chichester was the Orientalist William Thorne (1568 - 1630), who had a hand in translating the King James Bible.
I bought on Ebay kjv super giant print. I am so excited to read it 🎉
When does the book on the Catalog of the Greek Testaments come out?
God knew what he was doing when he gave the English world the perfect book. KJV
@@OmarGonzalez-gx1ksWhat does that have to do with my question?
@@OmarGonzalez-gx1ksThere is no a perfect translations.
@@aitornavarro6597 I knew where you going , that’s why I said that. You can claim all day there is no perfect translation til you turn blue. I know I have the perfect translation, KJV. You welcome!
.
@@OmarGonzalez-gx1ks I read the KJV so your comment makes no sense. I simply don't believe translations are inspired like the originals were inspired. Languages don't equate 100% in translation therefore perfect translations are impossible although translations are nearly accurate.
Amen !
Bart erhman was a student of Metzger (textual critic ), who didn’t believe the account in Genesis and some other scripture.
@@RichardMaldonado Bart Erhman cannot give you hope, joy, love and peace. Bart Erhman does not have faith and is like the first century religious leaders in Jesus time
Great job and God Bless you all.
If the Byzantine manuscripts are preferred, why use a translation based on half a dozen of them instead of the majority reading of the 6,000 manuscripts? The Byzantine majority reading is much closer to the Alexandrian readings, than it is to the Textus Receptus.
may i ask if somebody used another version of the bible other than the KJV on witnessing a person then that person saved do you think that person really saved because he uses another version of the bible
It is not about the translation, but the message. Is Jesus the Son of God? Yes. Was he executed for our sins and rose on the 3rd day? Yes. Our we forgiven if we follow Christ and receive him as our savior as long as we repent and turn from our sins? Yes.
The shortest is the most accurate because why would you TAKE AWAY? Makes more sense to add.
You guys are saying things without substantiating any of your claims.
They are a cult. They worship the King Jimmy over God.
New Covenant Whole Gospel:
Who is now the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary?
What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. What brings all local churches together into one Body under the blood of Christ? The answer is found below.
Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him.
He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth.
Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD:
Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? What did Paul say about Genesis 12:3 in Galatians 3:8? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart.
Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36)
We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.
1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.
1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.
1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us.
The following verses prove the Holy Spirit is the master teacher for those now in the New Covenant.
Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
Mar 1:8 I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost.
Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
Act 11:16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost.
1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
Watch the TH-cam videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.
Amen!
It’s funny that Gipp mentioned the Ankleburg show. Him and the other 2 KJVO guys got owned by facts by real scholars.
It's not that I'm "King James Only" but I'm Word of God Only. It just so happens, that's what GOD decided the Bible to be.
I am word of God only. Which is why I reject the KJV only heresy
@@Sam-tk6us - In so doing ... You reject the Truth !!!
@@shamusmcgee861 I do not reject the truth. The Father's word is truth. Jesus is the way the truth and the life. The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of truth. The three persons of the Godhead, in perfect unity. The KJV only heresy a man made tradition that has no scriptural support. In other words a false teaching and a damnable deception. Something that could not have existed before 1611.
@@Sam-tk6us - Well ...are you for the King James or against it. Make up your mind. You are not making any sense. !!!
@@shamusmcgee861 Should you not be asking me "am I for the Lord Jesus Christ or not"? Yes by God's grace I am a child of God because of what Christ did for me. Dying for my sin. By the grace of God I am on the Lord's side. If you mean am I going to bow down to the idolatry which is King James onlyism. A man made tradition without any scriptural support. Definitely not I was making perfect sense. What was it you did not understand?
13:40…”they would make copies if doctrinal verses…”. What proof do you have of this? It’s sounds good, plausible, but sounding good doesn’t make it true
the translation of the Hebrew Bible into Koine Greek, may have been produced at Alexandria, Egypt in stages, starting about 250 BCE. The Alexandrian community then included the largest community of Jews, including a group of scholars who prepared the translation.
Codex Sinaiticus and codex vaticanus are the oldest manuscripts dated to mid 4th century AD compared to the more recent Majority text or received text.
There are barely any differences in the various translations apart from sone contested verses (Mark 16:9-20) is an example.
In the newer Bible translations those verses are still in there but with brackets stating these verses are not in the older or more reliable manuscripts)
Nothing takes away from the Christian doctrine - in fact we now have an embarrassment of riches as far as manuscripts are concerned -
These manuscripts 5,800 plus - do not differ in any substantial way apart from spelling mistakes or quotation marks etc.
Even the KJV was translated and also has side notes.
No-one is trying to get rid of the King James Bible - it is a beautiful translation with Elizabethan language - however it is difficult to read for today’s reader - and so it was updated to todays language in 1982 with the NKJV and then we have the NIV and ESV etc all translated with teams of over 50 scholars and PhD theologians and professors from around the world who were very careful to preserve the word for word text as much as possible
(NIV more mixture of thought for thought and using critical text. The critical text and the Textus Receptus barely differ
It is healthy to have different translations and to compare
One thing these KJVO people will never admit that the translators for the KJV also used the critical text method when working on it.
CH Spurgeon referred the opponents of the King James Bible - as 'College Boys'.
I’m wondering if any “False Friends” will be spying on this video.
Those are legit. Mark (forgot his last name), has some valid points if you actually listen to him. He never bashes the translation, but talks about how the English language has changed in the last 400 years. Words meant one thing when the KJV was translated. The same word as changed it’s meaning so when reading in the KJV we see it in our modern English when it meant something else 400 years ago.
Great subject, content and conversation....BUT...the man who is coughing is soooo distracting.
Keep the mic away from incessant coughers....or excuse yourself from the table...
So graceful of you.
My elevator pitch: The KJB has the links in every chain from OT to NT using consistency in word usage, prophecy, mathematics and timing with respect to how it began its journey on the world stage.
Consider: it came at the height of the reformation. It came at the birth of the English Empire. It survived the gunpowder plot of the Jesuits. And then I dare you to look at the lives surrounding the 4 Stuart's who were the kings of england at the time.
Christ came to earth at the 4th prophetic day of the creation week. Mary was catholic beheaded by Elizabeth who was protestant. Elizabeth was the 'virgin' queen. Mary was James' mother. James was VI of Scotland, and I of England =7. Charles I beheaded, Charles II avenged, return of the KING. And many many more, not to mention the kangaroo court of Charles I who was king James I's son. Jesus was in a kangaroo court. Jesus will return to defeat all his enemies. I cant shorten this comment because that's all this is... just another comment. But I encourage everyone to look without trusting the Jesuit history revisionism that's going on in today's cancel culture, when it comes to whether or not you believe James was a Godly man...he was human right? Then he's not God on earth and he sins so is that going to make the whole bible a farce? I should hope not!
Deuteronomy 16:11 "...which the LORD thy God hath chosen to place his name there."
After the 1769 version, technology accelerated with steam engine
Also..less than 150 years between lightbulb and snartphone
@@JPH4886 check out TRUTH IS is CHRIST'S
channel
He uses the pure bible software and finds other numeric patterns
The word LORD is 1,769 times in 1st 5 books...take away Genesis and its 1,611 times
I grew up in KJV, Fundy Baptist churches. There’s no doubt in my mind that they mean well; however, the facts cannot justify the claims of KJV-Only.
Which facts? Can you be specific?
Codex vaticanus is bad because it was discovered in a Catholic library.
The KJV translators used Erasmus’ greek printed texts, oops he was a Catholic and he got his manuscripts from Catholic libraries.
The other translations use Wescott and Hort’s greek text, they don’t, they use Nestlé-Aland or UBS.
Words like
Lehi vs the jaw in Judges 16
Hallelujah vs Alleluia in Rev 19
Charity vs love for agape
Calvary vs place of a skull (the latin is locum calvarium ie place of a skull) in Luke 22
Lucifer vs morning star in Isaiah 14 (Lucifer is the Latin word for you guessed it morning star) etc etc
Sam Gipp's teaching on Easter in Acts 12:4 is very flawed. He provides no evidence whatsoever that establishes an etymological link between Easter and Astarte. Alexander Hislop offers no evidence either for such a connection. Back in 1611 "Easter" was used interchangeably with "Passover" to refer to the Jewish feast. You would think one would do a bit of research into how particular words were used in 1611.
The Greek word behind Easter in Acts 12:4 is pascha. This word is found 29 times and translated in all other places as passover. Some KJV translators likes some words. Like charity for agape in 1 Cor. The most frequent occurrence of agape is in 1 John and not once translated as charity. The KJVO make a big deal about charity not being used in other translations. There are quite a number of others also.
Guy on the right needs a throat losenger
The elephant in the room that no kjvonlyist will discuss honestly is, what about the known and obvious errors in the King James? With all due respect, I teach and preach from the KJV, but to say a translation - any translation - is perfect and without error is demonstrably false. For instance, there's no Easter in scripture. The word is pascha. It means passover.
So is Passover before or after the feast of unleavened bread?
Wrong. Read The Answer Book, see Question #2, by Sam Gipp.
The original Greek word is pacha, which would normally and rightly be translated as Passover, but in this case the KJB Translators knew that it was Easter, because those were the days of Unleavened Bread, which comes after Passover, so Passover was over, thus it has to be Easter.
No more chirping from Brayan ?
@@paulflannigan888 Sam Gipp's answer book? Doing mental gymnastics to try and justify the mistranslation of Easter. Instead of the correct translation which is Passover . The KJV translators got it wrong. Ezekiel 45 v 21 makes it clear that Passover is a feast of seven days. Not that the KJV idolaters like Sam Gipp care about truth. Just the insane worship of an imperfect uninspired translation. Easter was not known when Luke wrote the book of Acts. Herod wanted to please the Jews that is why he was waiting till after the Passover. Other reasons to reject the KJV only heresy, besides Sam Gipp. Will Kinney, Steven Anderson, Mike Hoggard, Gene Kim, David W Daniels, Robert Breaker. All represent the lunatic fringe of the KJV only cult. Professional liar Gail Riplinger represents the extreme lunatic fringe of the KJV only cult. Her so called "acrostic algebra" alongside Mike Hoggard's numerology is the spirit of divination or witchcraft. So is heretic Gene Kim's and his blasphemous idolatrous teachings. As has been said Satan does not need atheists, he has the KJV only cult spreading his deceptions. Thank God for better more accurate modern translations, in English we can understand. Without all the added uninspired verses that are in the KJV.
When the Lord saved me, I immediately learned Greek. Why bother with a translation? 🤔
Probably because Greek is a dead language.
You learned Greek immediately?
@michaelharrington75 well, it took a few years technically... but I was in prison at the time.
We keep being told that all these revisions are made for readability. That's not the issue at all. The issue has never been readability. The issue is source documents. 3000+ source documents supporting KJV. Sometimes called majority text. The other versions, including NKJV, are supported by 50-70 supporting texts. Sinaiticus was actually pulled out of a garbage can. KJV was uncontested for 350 years. People who call people who defend KJV only a cult are a group who I would call the 'anything but the KJV' cult. Kjv is still 30% of Bibles sold. Next closest is nasb at 15%.
Bro actually said "academia is not a friend to the bible"
More like it’s not a friend of king James onlyism.
He is probably referring to pharisees of today. God bless.
Ruckman was right ! Nobody has the originals and if you had them , what are you going to do with them ? The universal language is English not Greek , the King James Bible is superior to the original autographs- Ruckman was right
I AM KJV EXCLUSIVE - I BELIEVE THE KJV IS THE BEST TRANSLATION (IN ENGLISH) WE HAVE - I BELIEVE THE LORD GOD DID INDEED PERSERVE HIS WORD IN ENGLISH WITH THE KJV - *BUT* I DO *NOT* BELIEVE THAT THE KJV IS INSPIRED!!!!!!!
BUT I WOULD LIKE TO ASK; *"WHICH PERSON, ON THE PANEL ABOVE, USES THE 1611 PUBLICATION OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE???!!!!"*
The translated text of 1611 is the same today. There were corrections of printing errors, a font change and standardization of spelling. The KJB is God's pure words perfectly preserved in English and therefore is inspired. The inspiration is in the words.
@@johnword4775
*INSPIRATION MEANS YOU START WITH A BLANK SHEET OF PAPER, THEN THE LORD GOD TELLS YOU WHAT TO WRITE ON IT - PLAIN AND SIMPLE!!!!!!!*
THE KJV TRANSLATERS STARTED WITH A BISHOP'S BIBLE AND CORRECTED THE TEXT TO BETTER FIT THE MASEROTIC HEBREW AND THE BEZA'S 1598 GREEK TEXT - *THAT IS NOT INSPIRATION* - YOU ARE JUST A PARROT THAT KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT THE TRANSLATION OF THE KJV - BUT, I SHALL NOT PERSUE THIS IF YOU WILL JUST STOP TRYING TO POKE ME IN THE EYE, I WOULD NOT WANT TO BE THE ONE THAT SHATTERS ANY OF YOUR FAITH, AND I TOO LOVE THE KJV BIBLE - THE KJV BIBLE IS GOD'S WORD IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, THAT IS A GOOD STATEMENT, JUST STAY AWAY FROM THE WORD "INSPIRED"!!!!!!!
There are errors in its translation.
The King James Bible is infact infallible.
Thou shalt not... Oh forget it... Just insert whatever you want.
@@JP-ec9rl
SORRY, BUT I REALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOUR POST HAD TO DO WITH THE KING JAMES BIBLE???!!!!
No offense! I am a Christian, it just that I was trying to sleep but couldn’t until I come across this video. 😊😊😊😊
Education isn't for everyone! 🤣
Win one for the Gipper! 😅