Main battle tanks are falling out of favor now that complete aerial domination is assumed. The main opponents of tanks like the Booker will not be other tanks (those are killed from the sky) but groups on insurgents with RPGs and the like.
No, the Bradley is more of a hardened troop transport with a 25mm chaingun. This has more armor and a 105mm main gun, plus crowd dispersal countermeasures like those seen on an Abrams
105 mm main gun will be useless. Ancient 7-72 also weight around 40 tons but has 120 mm cannon. The only purpose of the smaller caliber is to force the government to stock up on a new type of ammo.
A senseless piece of iron. Drones have proven that armored vehicles are either on fire, or you need to create mobile barns like the Russians. This is provided that you have the same Quantity of electronic warfare and air defense as the Russians.
Main battle tanks are falling out of favor now that complete aerial domination is assumed. The main opponents of tanks like the Booker will not be other tanks (those are killed from the sky) but groups on insurgents with RPGs and the like.
There seems to be some confusion in here between the Russian and US anti-drone capabilities 😂
So its a re branded Bradley?
No, the Bradley is more of a hardened troop transport with a 25mm chaingun. This has more armor and a 105mm main gun, plus crowd dispersal countermeasures like those seen on an Abrams
No.
In an era of many types of man portable anti-tank weapons - this only makes sense for General Dynamics bottom line.
drone food. aint worth a shit.
105 mm main gun will be useless. Ancient 7-72 also weight around 40 tons but has 120 mm cannon. The only purpose of the smaller caliber is to force the government to stock up on a new type of ammo.
T-72 not 7-72
A senseless piece of iron. Drones have proven that armored vehicles are either on fire, or you need to create mobile barns like the Russians. This is provided that you have the same Quantity of electronic warfare and air defense as the Russians.