A beautiful woman talking about literature and philosophy? Sign me up. As a society, we ALL need to get more involved in discussing ideas worth discussing. Imagine if the algorithm was designed to push learning and critical thinking rather than outrage and clickbait. We create the society we deserve.
Hello ❤, thank you very much. Of course, considering that I work specifically on German idealism and Western philosophy, Kant distinguished between theoretical understanding and practical reason in the First and Second Critiques, and that in the Critique of the Power of Judgment through the power of reflective judgment, he sought a connection between practical reason and theoretical understanding. On the basis that understanding and practical reason are two distinct powers and their scope of application is also distinct, and as a result, we must think about these two powers, the categories of understanding, and the laws of practical reason in a single and unique subject without encountering any distinction, in such a way that the possibility of realizing the goal of practical reason in the world of objective reality, which is governed by coercive causality, is teleologically compatible with this world. Kant attributes this teleology as an a priori concept to reflective judgment, and at the same time, the mediation of reflective judgment between understanding and practical reason is envisioned. From a post-Kantian perspective, this dualism is interpreted as a kind of defect, and the solution is In order to save freedom, which was his mission in the Enlightenment tradition, Kant first developed the dialectic of practical reason in the first postulate, namely freedom, which was a conception of man as he is in himself. In the final part of the Critique of Judgment, he developed the natural finality of the idea of God in such a way that the existence of a superhuman understanding is conceived, which is created in such a way that the realization of the finality of practical reason is teleologically compatible with it. These two solutions were not convincing from the post-Kantian perspective. As a result, first Reinhold and then Fichte in the Comprehensive Foundations of the Doctrine of Knowledge consider the beginning of philosophy as a starting point that can prove the unconditional principle, namely the act of self-expansion of the absolute I, which the transcendental philosopher wants to research. After that, in the Doctrine of Knowledge in a New Way, he describes the action of pure self-consciousness as rational intuition, and this is what Kant's critical philosophy strives for. In order to realize this Kantian ideal, namely the compatibility of these two theoretical and practical realms, the beginning point is with the action of the The self-expansion of the absolute self begins to explain the representations with a sense of necessity, which is a kind of activism and knowledge, and not a mere act of representation, and consequently makes possible the Kantian ideal that I mentioned above, namely the reconciliation of the realms of the coercive causality of nature and freedom, morality and nature, because this beginning is both theoretical and practical.
What an absorbing subject. Of course, I think Kant has the right idea even though it doesn’t square with our current fascination with identity politics, or the scientific idea that we do not have free will. You keep making the videos. I’ll keep watching.
Wow Im so happy I found your channel! I’m a 25 yo first year biology PhD student and this was really fun to listen to while cooking. Your cinematography is very beautiful. Kant is so inspiring, I always wish I had the intellectual perseverance to live as he described but it is very hard.
Ah, I do love me some Kantian ethics! Thanks for this video! A great refresher and a fun way to spend some time! The aesthetics of this channel are also really cool and cozy! I saw some criticisms of your accent, and I would like to hit back against them. You are perfectly understandable if the listener is properly paying attention. Everyone can always improve on clarity, but don't feel too bad about it! Oh, and this might go beyond the scope of your channel, but I would love to see a small section, perhaps at the end, to hear some of your personal thoughts and feelings on the video's topic! Just something to think about!
I'll show you my chat gpt, oh yeah i just push this button on my smartphone, some changes....the wiring will not agree it's not hospitable but we have a priori something else to make sense of conditional perception in the mind of alterity in process perception of words and reality formation regardless of the mind of alterity the process of sense psychology then effectively decenters objects to be analyzed in the mind through language and practices that use a specific formula for self positing alterity in the content independently of the idealism of the other to deconstruct them to constantly shape-shifting reality by reducing elements of our system to achieve a difference in perception as a totality of existence within a demographic organization in cognitive bias of being towards death in a trancdental lifeworld of being towards something that others as well as the something others... practical reasonable thought on alterity psychology of the other, analytic that emerged into continental deconstruction
Bravo --- stellar video on all levels, After I studied Ethics during my university days, I tried to follow Kant's "Categorical Imperative" in my 20s, but i failed numerous times :( Keep forging on --- you've launched a provocative, informative and entertaining channel📖📖📚📚👏👏 Also excellent intonation and vocal delivery -- you're a polyglot.
Бля, я так и не понял троллинг это или нет, и есть ли тут намек на ее внешность. Но иногда комменты просто пишешь в моменте, на эмоциях. Это был как раз один из них
A day on earth Every day I see the world I am forever amazed by its unending wonders And all the beauty of everything around me Each blade of grass, every pebbles, shoot and twigs Drops of dew as diamonds in the morning sun The fresh scent of renewed hope in the early breath The promises of life awoken Riches and abundance and rewards near I am so very small - this world so big Though I look and look I cannot see very far But I can see I belong here That I belong to this here The new day also brings hurdles and sorrow Streams to cross, treacherous and menacing covers I am just a solitary little mouse trotting along In this immeasurable field I call home And no matter the dangers and the threats However unkind the weather and cold the nights And the friends lost and the dark days I am grateful for this ground I walk on I am the life given to me Like a voice needs a listener And the dream a dreamer This earth comes alive under my tiny little feet I am bound to it as it is to me Here and now I belong To this life given to me I am a voice, I am a dream, I am a breath I am just a little mouse
very informational and effective presenting style all keypoints covered and had me watch all other videos on this channel and waiting for the next video.!!!!
Listening to your accent i would guess you're German....probably. Anyways.....wonderful to see a lovely girl like you starting a channel about philosophy. Maybe there is hope for this generation after all. Consider me a liker and subscriber! Greetings from Germany!
I hear his critique of the classic Utilitarianism, but it's always bugged me that people use that one weakness to throw the whole thing out rather than simply add the consideration of all people as an end as part of the consideration of how "good" any given action is, but...oh well.
Same goes for Hedonism. The Epicurean school is more complicated than solely 'pleasure for me good, more please'. It also took into account overall wellbeing, long-term effects and the feelings of others. Even intellectuality and an interest in the arts was important to them. Kant howevers denies that things can be 'good', in a moral sense. This seems true, but in another sense all things are good, in as much as they can be desired (like health, a loved one, or food). Also it would make sense that good-willed intentions are also good (in a derived sense). The way Kant uses it seems a bit limited
This is really great! So according to Kant, you may have a duty to your wife even after you're divorced. But that doesn't extend to having sex with her, does it? What about doing whatever _she_ thinks you should do? I mean, imagine someone who referred to herself as "She who must be obeyed" while you were married. Of course that was just playfullness. And if she doesn't speak to you, except through her daughter, who is really a part of herself, ... well, that's not authority, is it? How did Emmanuel Kant know all this stuff?
1) Kant glorifies the Good will to submit to categorical imperative - however, Jung essentially argues that no unexamined good will can remain that way. 2) Is duty still admirable when fully integrated into the being (insofar as it is possible)? Because blindly following duty is a disservice to the source of the duty (the source may need some rectification, tying into Kant's rebuke of blindly following external laws), while identifying with the source of the duty itself seems blasphemous. 3) The conflict between admiring nature and wishing to transcend it is interesting. Kant admired the steadfast precision of the swallows but wanted greater dignity than an animal. Lovely but absurd in a way. Does reason over instinct as a principle really have a place in a world where incredibly important actions happen in the present without time to reserve judgment? Just some psychological thoughts that arise due to your video, which is excellent and comes off as sincere.
I wish more intelligent people cared about aesthetics and decorum. It used to be the norm. Many videos have fancy editing, which is nice and makes them more engaging, but anyone can do that. These videos on the other hand are made special because of the effort you put into yourself.
I respect Kant I really do, but I do question the ‘untold perfect’ capacity he seems to suggest humans have for following rational duty. Just as an example, you don’t cure a depressed person by saying ‘don’t be depressed’ and importantly this is because they don’t have control over that, if they did life would be easy, you could control your emotions and thus only take action according to rational duty. This shows Humans, try as they might, can not completely cut themselves off from emotional influence. In fact in order to continue following rational thought you might first have to do an action which fixes your emotional state ready for identifying duty again.
Kant is emphasizing that humans are very prone to following their emotions and inclinations, he‘s not saying that we are easily capable of acting rationally
I have to agree ':/ The script is great, though! But I do struggle with parsing many of the sentences. For me, in particular, the challenge was words with the English consonant sounds “th” and “r”. (Neither of these consonant sounds exist in German, right?)
It is hard to imagine how this material could have been more concisely and effectively presented! Very well done!
well some visuals would definitely make it more effective... that's not hard to imagine lol
@@ABRARKHANISMfor me, given the subject matter, a finely crafted essay was perfectly sufficient, particularly given we’re in the “Literature Café.”
A beautiful woman talking about literature and philosophy? Sign me up. As a society, we ALL need to get more involved in discussing ideas worth discussing. Imagine if the algorithm was designed to push learning and critical thinking rather than outrage and clickbait. We create the society we deserve.
Very good introduction to Kant for me. Thank you!
Wonderful video! Please continue to create more content like this. I wish we had more content like your channel’s on TH-cam.
Hello ❤, thank you very much. Of course, considering that I work specifically on German idealism and Western philosophy, Kant distinguished between theoretical understanding and practical reason in the First and Second Critiques, and that in the Critique of the Power of Judgment through the power of reflective judgment, he sought a connection between practical reason and theoretical understanding. On the basis that understanding and practical reason are two distinct powers and their scope of application is also distinct, and as a result, we must think about these two powers, the categories of understanding, and the laws of practical reason in a single and unique subject without encountering any distinction, in such a way that the possibility of realizing the goal of practical reason in the world of objective reality, which is governed by coercive causality, is teleologically compatible with this world. Kant attributes this teleology as an a priori concept to reflective judgment, and at the same time, the mediation of reflective judgment between understanding and practical reason is envisioned. From a post-Kantian perspective, this dualism is interpreted as a kind of defect, and the solution is In order to save freedom, which was his mission in the Enlightenment tradition, Kant first developed the dialectic of practical reason in the first postulate, namely freedom, which was a conception of man as he is in himself. In the final part of the Critique of Judgment, he developed the natural finality of the idea of God in such a way that the existence of a superhuman understanding is conceived, which is created in such a way that the realization of the finality of practical reason is teleologically compatible with it. These two solutions were not convincing from the post-Kantian perspective. As a result, first Reinhold and then Fichte in the Comprehensive Foundations of the Doctrine of Knowledge consider the beginning of philosophy as a starting point that can prove the unconditional principle, namely the act of self-expansion of the absolute I, which the transcendental philosopher wants to research. After that, in the Doctrine of Knowledge in a New Way, he describes the action of pure self-consciousness as rational intuition, and this is what Kant's critical philosophy strives for. In order to realize this Kantian ideal, namely the compatibility of these two theoretical and practical realms, the beginning point is with the action of the The self-expansion of the absolute self begins to explain the representations with a sense of necessity, which is a kind of activism and knowledge, and not a mere act of representation, and consequently makes possible the Kantian ideal that I mentioned above, namely the reconciliation of the realms of the coercive causality of nature and freedom, morality and nature, because this beginning is both theoretical and practical.
What an absorbing subject. Of course, I think Kant has the right idea even though it doesn’t square with our current fascination with identity politics, or the scientific idea that we do not have free will.
You keep making the videos. I’ll keep watching.
Great video! Super good content. Nice summary of Kant’s philosophy. Interesting example. I will watch more of this channel. A job well done!
❤️
Wow Im so happy I found your channel! I’m a 25 yo first year biology PhD student and this was really fun to listen to while cooking. Your cinematography is very beautiful.
Kant is so inspiring, I always wish I had the intellectual perseverance to live as he described but it is very hard.
You did say that it is coming soon, but I wasn't expecting it with the same day hahahah and another great one at that
😄😁
Ah, I do love me some Kantian ethics! Thanks for this video! A great refresher and a fun way to spend some time! The aesthetics of this channel are also really cool and cozy!
I saw some criticisms of your accent, and I would like to hit back against them. You are perfectly understandable if the listener is properly paying attention. Everyone can always improve on clarity, but don't feel too bad about it!
Oh, and this might go beyond the scope of your channel, but I would love to see a small section, perhaps at the end, to hear some of your personal thoughts and feelings on the video's topic! Just something to think about!
Love it!, I was just researching and writing about objective and subjective approaches to morality, very interesting topic
Metaethics! Very exciting and debatable :)
@@literature.café Indeed! maybe you could do a video about it hehe 👀👀
I'll show you my chat gpt, oh yeah i just push this button on my smartphone, some changes....the wiring will not agree it's not hospitable but we have a priori something else to make sense of conditional perception in the mind of alterity in process perception of words and reality formation regardless of the mind of alterity the process of sense psychology then effectively decenters objects to be analyzed in the mind through language and practices that use a specific formula for self positing alterity in the content independently of the idealism of the other to deconstruct them to constantly shape-shifting reality by reducing elements of our system to achieve a difference in perception as a totality of existence within a demographic organization in cognitive bias of being towards death in a trancdental lifeworld of being towards something that others as well as the something others... practical reasonable thought on alterity psychology of the other, analytic that emerged into continental deconstruction
What a complete analysis. Great work!
Thank you! :)
Very nice video :), will watch the rest when I have time.
Bravo --- stellar video on all levels,
After I studied Ethics during my university days, I tried to follow Kant's "Categorical Imperative" in my 20s, but i failed numerous times :(
Keep forging on --- you've launched a provocative, informative and entertaining channel📖📖📚📚👏👏
Also excellent intonation and vocal delivery -- you're a polyglot.
Thank you !☺️
вот смотрю я на тебя и твои видео... есть в этом что-то светлое, легкое, что облегчает мою душу которая уже со временем отвыкает от подобного
Это моральный закон просвечивает наружу :))
Бля, я так и не понял троллинг это или нет, и есть ли тут намек на ее внешность. Но иногда комменты просто пишешь в моменте, на эмоциях. Это был как раз один из них
@@mev23611 намёк на тему видео и самую известную цитату из обсуждаемого произведения. :)
Great presentation, also wonderning if the topic of existentialism would make a good video :))
I keep that in mind :)
Great work, thank you.
A day on earth
Every day I see the world
I am forever amazed by its unending wonders
And all the beauty of everything around me
Each blade of grass, every pebbles, shoot and twigs
Drops of dew as diamonds in the morning sun
The fresh scent of renewed hope in the early breath
The promises of life awoken
Riches and abundance and rewards near
I am so very small - this world so big
Though I look and look I cannot see very far
But I can see I belong here
That I belong to this here
The new day also brings hurdles and sorrow
Streams to cross, treacherous and menacing covers
I am just a solitary little mouse trotting along
In this immeasurable field I call home
And no matter the dangers and the threats
However unkind the weather and cold the nights
And the friends lost and the dark days
I am grateful for this ground I walk on
I am the life given to me
Like a voice needs a listener
And the dream a dreamer
This earth comes alive under my tiny little feet
I am bound to it as it is to me
Here and now I belong
To this life given to me
I am a voice, I am a dream, I am a breath
I am just a little mouse
How can you be so pretty and smart at the same time? This is a compliment 🙂
very informational and effective presenting style all keypoints covered and had me watch all other videos on this channel and waiting for the next video.!!!!
Immanuel Kant!
Rhymes with 'hunt.' Bravo.
Keep on the good work:)
Actually a super good vid
❤️
Listening to your accent i would guess you're German....probably.
Anyways.....wonderful to see a lovely girl like you starting a channel about philosophy. Maybe there is hope for this generation after all.
Consider me a liker and subscriber!
Greetings from Germany!
She is so smart.
And pretty. 😏
@@dariuszgaat5771 Bruh. She is reciting Kant; that's not important right now 💀💀💀
0:25 existential dread intensifies
😄
drama queen
Wonderful review! Can you do a video on the stranger by albert camus. Have a nice day!
I keep that in mind :)
I hear his critique of the classic Utilitarianism, but it's always bugged me that people use that one weakness to throw the whole thing out rather than simply add the consideration of all people as an end as part of the consideration of how "good" any given action is, but...oh well.
Same goes for Hedonism. The Epicurean school is more complicated than solely 'pleasure for me good, more please'. It also took into account overall wellbeing, long-term effects and the feelings of others. Even intellectuality and an interest in the arts was important to them.
Kant howevers denies that things can be 'good', in a moral sense. This seems true, but in another sense all things are good, in as much as they can be desired (like health, a loved one, or food). Also it would make sense that good-willed intentions are also good (in a derived sense). The way Kant uses it seems a bit limited
Absolutely, there are definitely more things to say about utilitarianism
Moral is forced and expected to be followed by everybody. Personal responsability is out of the equation. Personal ethic is by far superior.
Idc who the IRS sends I’m still not doing my taxes
🤝
Thanks TH-cam algorithm 😊
This is really great! So according to Kant, you may have a duty to your wife even after you're divorced. But that doesn't extend to having sex with her, does it? What about doing whatever _she_ thinks you should do? I mean, imagine someone who referred to herself as "She who must be obeyed" while you were married. Of course that was just playfullness. And if she doesn't speak to you, except through her daughter, who is really a part of herself, ... well, that's not authority, is it? How did Emmanuel Kant know all this stuff?
1) Kant glorifies the Good will to submit to categorical imperative - however, Jung essentially argues that no unexamined good will can remain that way.
2) Is duty still admirable when fully integrated into the being (insofar as it is possible)? Because blindly following duty is a disservice to the source of the duty (the source may need some rectification, tying into Kant's rebuke of blindly following external laws), while identifying with the source of the duty itself seems blasphemous.
3) The conflict between admiring nature and wishing to transcend it is interesting. Kant admired the steadfast precision of the swallows but wanted greater dignity than an animal. Lovely but absurd in a way. Does reason over instinct as a principle really have a place in a world where incredibly important actions happen in the present without time to reserve judgment?
Just some psychological thoughts that arise due to your video, which is excellent and comes off as sincere.
Сделайте видео про Ницще. Вы интересуетесь акселерационизмом? Ник Лэнд, Марк Фишер?
Where in Germany are you from?
Hy, great content.What camera did you use in this video?
Canon EOS 2000D
@@literature.café Thank you very much! Very nice and warm colours.
God bless you!
I wish more intelligent people cared about aesthetics and decorum. It used to be the norm. Many videos have fancy editing, which is nice and makes them more engaging, but anyone can do that. These videos on the other hand are made special because of the effort you put into yourself.
What's your educational background? Are you working with a manager?
No, I don’t-it’s a hobby. :) I study Philosophy and Economics.
I respect Kant I really do, but I do question the ‘untold perfect’ capacity he seems to suggest humans have for following rational duty.
Just as an example, you don’t cure a depressed person by saying ‘don’t be depressed’ and importantly this is because they don’t have control over that, if they did life would be easy, you could control your emotions and thus only take action according to rational duty.
This shows Humans, try as they might, can not completely cut themselves off from emotional influence. In fact in order to continue following rational thought you might first have to do an action which fixes your emotional state ready for identifying duty again.
Kant is emphasizing that humans are very prone to following their emotions and inclinations, he‘s not saying that we are easily capable of acting rationally
You are incredible. I suspect that you've studied philosophy and classic literature? What sparked your interest in such "deep" subjects?
C - E - D
L - E - U - N - Z ceptum season paper henry paper
you are beautifulll ♥
simps in the comments be like: omg the subject i couldn't care less about makes sense, thank you!
i thought i was the only one that noticed that in 90% of the comments hahahahahah
You are too beautiful to be this intelligent
You are beauty (next 2-3 years still young; enough) and you read philosophy?
I love you... :D
Good stuff, but I have to say that your accent is a drawback, which renders certain content of yours challenging to hear clearly.
I have to agree ':/ The script is great, though!
But I do struggle with parsing many of the sentences. For me, in particular, the challenge was words with the English consonant sounds “th” and “r”. (Neither of these consonant sounds exist in German, right?)
Thank you for your feedback. I try my best to make it clearer :)
Turning on the subtitles work for me