Can An S-400 Be Beat?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Go check out kommandostore....
Sign up for their mailing list and get 10% off first order!
For Business Inquires - CovertCabal@Ellify.com
If you'd like to help support me continue to create videos, you can do so here...
Patreon (Monthly) - / covertcabal
PayPayl (One Time Donations) - www.paypal.me/...
Discord - / discord
Names at the end are of supporters at Silver Level on Patreon, and $10 or more on PayPal
If you would like to have your name kept private, feel free to send me an email, or contact me through Patreon
Amazon Prime 30 Free Trial - amzn.to/2AiNfvJ
Microphone I use = amzn.to/2zYFz1D
Video Editor = amzn.to/2JLqX5o
Military Aircraft Models = amzn.to/2A3NPxu
Military Strategy Book = amzn.to/2AaqwST
----------------------------------
Credits:
Footage:
Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation
creativecommon...
The NATO Channel
Ministry of Defence of Estonia
Department of Defense (US)
"The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."
KCNA - North Korea State Media
Music:
BTS Prolog - Kevin MacLeod - incompetech.com
creativecommons...
Go check out kommandostore.com/covertcabal
Sign up for their mailing list and get 10% off first order!
I was going to sleep and was thinking how the mini drones cab be beaten and I thought maybe equipping civilians with water guns will work , upon thinking this I immediately came to talk abou this in one of you comment sections and saw one of your vedios uploaded 3 minutes ago, damn , pls answers me What do u think about dealing small drones equipped with small warheads being dealt with water guns ??
Thanks very much....!
the S400 used in the African lion exercise were located in Algeria the strongest pro Russian North African country
Any system can be beat just depends on how many assets you are willing to loose in the process.
How effective the CIWS and C-RAM in real combat
TH-cam at 2:15 am in morning: How can we beat s400?
Me a office worker with no military ties at 2:15 am: Yeah , how?
Haha..soinds extremely familiar
Me at 7:17pm after not getting enough sleep last night: "WTF are you doing in the office at 2:15am?"
Indians work round the clock
Me after doing bong hits and eating pizza all night.
@@orneryokinawan4529 Hey now... why you gotta make everyone jealous? 😅. Ah, the good old days😞
The problem with talking about engaging a system like the S400 is that it won’t just be alone in the middle of an open field. Itl have an entire network of smaller air defenses around it. Having short and medium anti air systems backing up the S400 make it significantly more dangerous as it’s much harder to directly attack.
not to mention that there are missile tubes buried in the ground, ready to launch and you can't spot them until they launch
@@TeddyKrimsony I didn’t know of any that are stored underground.
Well like he pointed out their is a whole range of approaches to attacking the C400 which are also applicable to all those supporting elements which if they are busy turtling around the C400 to survive then they cant be covering the rushing by ground forces who will then have to also Turtle under air defense restricting their maneuver and strategic depth exposing them to all the Indirect mass fires he was showing at the end. This is to say nothing of the Entire network of supporting UAS and satellites supporting SEAD and the greater campaign. USAF has been using decoy Drone swarms in the 100s to overwhelm and spoof air defense sense the first Iraq war and probably long before, Azerbaijan replicated the tactic with Israeli help to great success against Russian air defense systems which you might have seen. Just spamming a bunch of cheap small loitering munitions that cost a fraction of even the cheaper Russian SAMs easily over whelm C400 and most of its support point defense.
@Intel Guru the fixed batterys sam sistem of Russia are A135 an A235 and they use a nuclear head to intercept a ballistic nuclear missile
@Intel Guru I wasnt aware of the fixed batteries. That’s interesting. And yes I’d say it’s much like attacking a strike group. The layered approach of defense can make things much more complicated. You’d have to juggle defeating the capabilities of multiple systems.
Hi, RF engineer there ... actually you put it wrong about antennas. Lower frequency is used for overvier radar due to longer range without need of narrow beam. Higher frequency tracking radar need array of several antennas to produce very narrow beam to overcome losses over distance and it is inherent phenomena of such array to produce side lobes due to periodical interence across the radiation pattern
did you mean periodical interference? if not I don’t know what perifical interence means
@@marianandnorbert either way, what that means is that the way a radar ‘beam’ is formed on modern radars always produces sidelobes due to how the emitted energy waves interfere with each other.
7:12 the image at is incorrect, no phased array radar can produce such a beam shape without sidelobes. This image is for a laser which can direct 100% of its energy in one direction, not a radar.
My head hurts haha
@@marianandnorbert yeah. typo on phone :)
My nose is bleeding!!
ATACMS, lol.
Summarizing:
Less effective, more risky methods:
- using low flying jets
- using radar jamming and attacking with aircraft
- using two jets (very risky)
More effective and less risky methods:
- spawning close the site and pistol whipping the crew until they surrender.
- sneaking up on the operators and reading bedtime stories so they'd be asleep when you actually attack.
The second one is the best
Just overload it with uav until it's missiles end then destroy it simple as
Just shoot a stinky fart at the s400 and the radars will malfunction
Send a squad to take it out with RPG's, Javelins or C4.
Or just use ATACMS, short range ballistic missiles that were designed in the 1980s and built in the 90s.
Once again, reality proves US cold war era tech >> modern ruzzian "tech"
Edit: forgot to add "LOL!"
It’s possible. No system is 100% invincible.
Anything is possible as long you know yourself and your enemies and what possibility in every scenario
@@bluearmy6847 No, You Are Wrong, Terrain and Unwanted Climatic Event Can Stop The Best Human Ever Created
That goes for the F16 to
1 pantsir, one s-400, one tor etc, YES can be beat. thats why Israel beats Syrian defenses. but a Russian complete setup of AAS , no one can beat it. that would be like: 6 acusition radars, 4 targeting radars, 1 s-500 for ABM systems, 4 s-400's with each 1 radar of each type, 4 launchers etc. then 2-3 s-300 VM mobile versions, 4-5 Tor's, buk's, 5-6 Pantsirs and then Shulkas. all of these systems will be layered and you simply cant beat all those systems at one time and they protect each other in an onion layer.
@Intel Guru a manned assault with no air support on a heavily guarded site deep inside unfriendly territory is not possible
Jamming is probably a core element of any attack on the system.
Reflective light waves are also optional to lower your view on enemy radar, orbital satellite, electric surveillance, modern equipment, etc. All though you'll still be visible to the naked eye it's enough to keep your foes in the dark on your position.
That was tried on a Slovak antique S-300 sometime in 200?. They were using ground based jammers (much more power than air based) and the conclusion was, no way. it was from some article in Jane's.
True. And maybe Turkey can give info on this system to its NATO allies!!
@@simplicius11 He explain the nature of Jamming pretty clearly and nothing is impervious to jamming any more then to the laws of physics, jamming for that matter is gonna be pretty hairy in this age of small stealthy UAS, flying jammer drones infiltrating between sights are gonna really be wreaking havoc to say noting or their supporting swarm of other attack and recon drones doing hard kills and signals intel. Air deliver a bunch of cheap small stealthy anti radiation kamikaze drones to come in under the jamming and bunch of decoy target drones like happened to Armenia and iraq.
I'd say everything: Jamming, counter-measures, saturation attacks, HARMs, multiple attack vectors, stealth, unguided bombs, artillery... You want everything you could possibly use.
Covert Cabal (describing American approach to air defense): "Interceptor aircraft just work so much better"
Mig 31: AM I JOKE TO YOU
Yes, because after actually reaching full interception speed the engines just commit sudoku
@@annelisemeier283 I think you your auto correct did you dirty. It's seppuku not sodoku 😅.
ArgosySpecOps nah that was on purpose. I couldn’t come up with a witty russian-sounding remark for suicide so I just went with sudoku.
And where the hell are the pantsir SRSAM which is also an integral part of a s400 regiment.
@@ArgosySpecOps "commit sudoku" is internet lingo. Same as purposefully screaming "Bonsai!" as a joke.
Almost always Russian equipment look better on paper. But when they're exposed to actual conflicts they fail to perform as intended.
The weakest link will be the operators -
1 - Guy forgets to arm the radar from standby
2 - passed out/sleeping
3 - misidentifies target as friendly
Or have too much vodka party 😂
It can only be on YT when millions of western brainless trolls whine and cry about it under Hollywood special effects fake flick😂😃😆reality fact
Add in Vodka 😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Another cracking video. This is why i rate this channel so highly above the mountain of poorer quality so called 'analysis videos' ! Keep up the good work
Well you can't rate it that much more higher than the robut voice channels, you got 3 choices, good, bad, and average. I thought this video was good so I gave it a thumbs up
And i took that personal
"analysis" - yea, sure.
meanwhile in the video a defensive weapon posed as a threat.
@@dfsdfsdsfsdfsdfs6694 What?
@@militaryanalysis5028 LOl
Im really glad you channel is going to kick mines ass! You absolutely deserve it and I love this channel! Keep it going man! I wanna see you hit 1 million subs! Keep it going brother! Best Regards, Matt
Haha thanks. I don't know if I can top your recent F-35 video though haha
too funny
Basing your military tactics on "Oh, yeah, that's trash, it can't be as good as our own stuff. It's all propaganda." Is the surest way to be surprised and chronically under-prepared.
Real militaries leave that way of thinking to the keyboard generals.
Lmaooo
You have no idea how true that statement is. Or maybe you do.
Exactly
This!!
Especially that is dangerous attitude if it is accompanied by a lack of concern about how to actually deal with the enemy even if it may be weaker than thought in some way. An underestimated enemy has an unnecessary advantage.
You forget that interceptors can only independently track a target at a relatively short range. Air defense radars are also overlapped and can receive returns from another radar system. Hiding from one will make you visible to another. Also, when a search radar picks up a contact, the targeting radar will lock on so there is no would be no use to that. There is the issue with electronic jamming in that the radar return is near impossible to fake unless you happen to be sitting right there in the truck. Attacking from multiple directions is also an issue. Not only would another installation catch you, a search radar is able to do the long range navigation as well. The attack radar (high frequency radar) is only 100% necessary if it's a missile without onboard guidance. If it is a missile with terminal guidance, then the low frequency radar can get it within a few 10's of kilometers where it will do it's thing. It is pointed out that the system can engage multiple targets from multiple directions and considering there are different missiles, I have no reason to doubt.The detection range you pointed out is not quite accurate and many other issues with your strategies. Unfortunately, getting around the s400 or any comprehensive radar network is a task, even for a stealth aircraft.
Remember how stealth works. That rcs is the lowest radar return assuming that you are facing directly at the radar system and presenting your least observable features. But radar waves are mostly deflected rather than absorbed and any other system on the area will put some heat on you.
Moral of the story, it's never a good m day to be an attacking pilot.
Too many stand-off weapons nowadays to be an emitting radar on a battlefield.
Good post Dude! These defense sites have one thing other YT channels don't: Knowledgeable people!
IADs tend to have been the first thing destroyed in the opening hours of a conflict though. Any emitting radars don't tend to last long.
@@_.-._.-._.-._.- Hence the existence of mobile radars & hidden radar sites, all providing auxiliary support should the main & known radars be destroyed. Afterwards it will be much more difficult to take them out.
@@izhamsham843 Plus over the air communications and data emitters tend to get taken out with prejudice, along with any IADS radar emitters. Which forces communications for the IADS to mostly occur via landlines, which are also vulnerable to stand-off weapons and tend to be taken out at the start of a SEAD or DEAD campaign in order to force them back into emitting OTA in order to be integrated. It's not a fun time to be an air defense system operator - everything wants to kill you and unmanned aircraft and loitering munitions usually mean a pointless death by operators to try and fire upon.
Drone swarm, doesn't have to be armed, just have to mask the real threat on the enemy radar, same concept as MIRV and decoys
Russians have various electronic warfare systems that are specifically designed to disable drones.
Pansirs would take care of those....s400 is always protected by battery of pantsir-1
Electronic countermeasure aren't the be all end all system, long range they suck and work the best at close range however that also mean the real threat would be closer too, and pantsir can be overwhelmed like in Syria. Russian ECM screw with the signals of drones, one way to go around that is a computer with pre program missions, it won't get any data from any other sources but its computer. Not very flexible but would get the job done targeting a known SAM site. Or you could go really fancy and put an AI in each drone, but we already have decoy missile, just have to dedicate a large number for this type of mission.
@@ghosta8116 would they, though? On paper all these Russian AA systems are perfect. But like he said in the video, and as Israel proved in Syria, it's pretty easy to destroy these things (Pantsir).
They'd probably be more effective if they were automated, like some of the American systems are.
Ghost A Pansirs have very recent footage of getting blown to smithereens by non-western drones tho
Decoys seem the way to go. Way cheaper than trying to saturate the SAM site with large numbers of expensive ordinance. Just so long as the decoy perfectly mimics the actual ordinance so the system doesn't know to ignore them and focus on the actual threat.
MALD is a very scary machine once you understand it's purpose.
Well, it's quite simple actually, if you throw enough stuff at it, eventually, something will hit.
just make sure what you throw is cheaper than the S400.
Smort
with the buk and pantshir it will be difficult
Why does it have to be cheaper? If the site is destroyed, then the location it is protecting is exposed to attack.
@@newguy954 if they can shoot down American prsm rocket artillery then fine
Because that's what America says it will use
Decoys are cheaper I'm sure ...
Looks like the Bayraktar, among other systems, seems to beat it.
We are finding now that its a highly overrated system. Cheap ass Turkish drones can beat it. Ukranian farmers can beat it. Russia is a paper tiger technologically
@@chrisbreezy-ryanbarbosa4320 Ukranian farmers can steal it
@@danepher ramming int with a tractor would do too :D
Bayraktrars haven't taken out any S400s. Plenty of Pantsir/Tor/Buk and earlier variants, as well as artillery, however. I don't believe the S400 batteries (which are located on Russian soil over the border) have been targeted at all, in any capacity.
@@VisibilityFoggy I personally think bayraktar and other drones could take out s400.
Because drones are small and has a low radar cross section, I don't think the s400 can take out something that small
It would be interesting to see a video comparing western air defence systems. It seems that with the proliferation of cruise and ballistic missiles, especially in China, that saturation attacks are becoming more likely. The best defence for Guam or Okinawa would seem to be many shorter range but less expensive missiles. An analysis of what kind of air defence mix would work best would be a very interesting video.
Western air defense is generally much less effective, because as noted in the video, in the west we rely on aircraft for air defense instead of surface based platforms.
@@92HazelMocha The West (Americas) has never been attack since 1812 by the British..
The US defence policy is the other country knowing they will be nuked off the planet if the attack the US mainland or properties.
It's how "MAD" has prevented WW3 for 60 years and still does.
@footballcoreano capable of making and has are two different things. Germany and the US have no such defenses now, Russia does. Everything beyond that is speculative.
I will do that when time comes. ;)
If you wish to understand how works SAM and the "whys" you can do it here.
th-cam.com/video/noYxsLqSMjI/w-d-xo.html
Sooner or later the channel will reach to S-300/400.
@@92HazelMocha When WW3 Starts no defence system will Keep ICBM warheads from coming down from orbit from doing their job.
Russia has a GDP below Bazil and still thinks its a world player.
Pantsir-S3E is made for protection of S-400, and Russian AA systems tactical doctrine is the formation of a ring - Pantsir protects S-400, BUK Viking protects the wider surrounding and S-400 aligned with NEBO-M watches everything and shoots on 300+ km. If something slips by, they have 2 more rings to beat.
"i found out the killer robots shut down after their killcounter hits a million so i just send wave after wave of my men until all the robots shut down"
No system is 100%
If the s400 was 100%
No plane would fly again
I am a Jet pilot and sorry to say, if you are locked by a S 400 system, simply eject.
What do you fly?
Its a #PoorAssesment by the host.
Why? For him saying that S-400 is stationary in a single location --- no! Its not! Its mobile and can be placed anywhere.
Secondly, the host said, the engagement radar looking at one direction. Thereforth, it can be destroyed from its blindspot if attacked from both sides, front & back --- WRONG!
Why? Do you think, in the real war, the #Russians will place only one engagement radar looking only at one side? Off course, theyre not stupid to do so. Ok
Perhaps, they can place 3 or 4 engagement radars looking at every side.
The host said, the s-400 can be attacked by a low flying fighter plane, another poor assesment.
In the real war scenario, does he think that if war is drclared between the US and Russia, then the Russians will let any aircraft carrier get near to its positions? Off course, big NO NO! Since the S-400 can strike target from around 400 - 600 km away, then just before any US planes take into flight from its aircraft carrier will be met with s-400s, then the Russians fighter planes will have plenty of time to meet US airforces in the air.
The host of this video is clearly lack the understanding of the basic in real war scenario
😂
@@theclassifiedvideos7168 The Western Single Point Perspective as always 😂they think they can just joke around and the later is going to sit and watch
@@sitegopro3411 exactly! One-sided. The narrator of this video know nothing, literally nothing, zero, about the basics in a real war scenario.
The only viable approach is saturation.
When you finally destroy the S-400, you ran out of missiles to attack the main target.
🤣🤣🤣
I don’t think they’re too concerned about defending the admiral Kuznetsov at this point. Except maybe the oil companies
Couple things to keep in mind, the first you did mention towards the end, they have not been used so all you are going on is guesses and what Russia -who hopes to sell them, say. Second in games, units or systems are roughly approximated at best. For the S 400 this is an approximation giving the games capabilities of an approximation. Another thing to keep in mind about games is that they often are more concerned about challenge and playability then recreating a perfect simulation of actual capabilities. Nobody wants to play a game that is WAY too easy or hard.
Now I'm picturing a B-2 dropping glide bombs like a flying fortress dropping bombs over Berlin.
Everything can be beaten , and then it is called supernova 😃💥
No nukes, there are other options to this instead of full power lethal explosive!
1. Multiple anti-missiles in low altitude.
2. Fake missiles with high radar system.
2/3. (Coordinated offenses) Using different angles to strike the SAM simultaneously.
3. Stealth electronic technology/ tactics.
4. Long range equipment which gives off no signal.
So many options and decisions that can be put into purpose, nuke only destroy everything and fighting a enemy with them mean death to the world.
Can the supernova be beaten tho 🤔
USA: How can we beat the S-400?
Russia: You really can't.
Israeli F35 pilot: Sure we can, just buy the latest obscenely expensive stealth fighter jets from the US!
Ukrainian helicopter pilots, flying questionably maintained Soviet-era choppers: hold my beer.
You’d never want to attack and sink admiral kuznitsov. It’s already doing that itself haha you’d just be helping them save time and money getting rid of it
This video is set up on the premise that only *one* search and *one* target radar are part of a SAM battery. In practice, SAM batteries have more Radars and different locations. A certain city in my country is defended by 8 SAM batteries with 3 different types of missile systems. One battery that I spotted had 2 search Radars and 3 target Radars. All the sites around te city are reportedly linked together for better data processing and noise filteration.
So in conclusion a well prepared, linked and positioned SAM battery systems are a huge threat which is the way most countries establish SAM batteries.
Slow low flying drones like the switchblade will beat it all day. They aren't going to shoot a bunch of birds thinking they are drones.
With the rise of supersonic missiles, any defense systems, theirs and ours become pretty obsolete to a degree.
This video makes a good case for a Pre-emptive Attack strategy. The best Defense is a good Offense. It is better to take out your enemies’ offensive capabilities (ie. Aircraft Carriers, Ground Air Bases, ICBM Missile sites, SLBM) before they can launch their planes and missiles, because once launched, they can effectively overwhelm and defeat your SAM systems. America should prepare for and anticipate a Russian pre-emptive attack soon.
what they need is a big data upgrade. this would slurp all the information from all sensors of all attacks to be analysed and improved on esp with regards to operator alertness. the pantsir attack when the guys were on a smoke break being one that comes to mind.
so an AI operator would be a great addition to the capability of the system.
'beat' is a verb, or an a noun.
'beaten' is an adjective.
"Can S-400 be beat" is grammatically incorrect and nonsensical in the noun form of 'beat'.
I too read that twice
Exactly
I'm pretty sure an S-401 can beat it.
Full sized Tomahawks with nuclear cluster bombs. 50 KT per cluster munition.
Welcome to 2021.
Perhaps the best way to attack a SAM site, S400 included, is to send in wild weasels (which nowadays can even be armed drones) - to get the radars turned on .... then cut loose ECM and HARMs simultaneously when they radiate. It's still a guess as to which platform would prevail. S400s are supposedly pretty good weapons, and they do have ECCM capability, so those drones would have to be a sort of swarm attack in themselves. Since the S400 sites are networked, you couldn't count on ALL the radars being turned on at once when you attack. It'd be a tough nut to crack, in my lay opinion. :)
What if someone is using multiple air defence systems just like India s400, then xrsam which has a range of 250km, then mrSam which has a range of 100km, then akash short range which has a range of 30km, in same place
Anything can be beaten or gotten around. The first step always seems to be getting a couple bad teenagers involved. Kids can circumvent ANYTHING adults can come up with.
Coming back today to point out we have footage from Ukraine of a SCALP missile merrily fly through an S400 site with a TOR launcher and not even be engaged
The newest missiles used with Wild Weasel tactics don't need an active radar to home. They remember where the radar was and keep going. They can also be used to attack launch sites as the data system on the launching platform remembers that as well. The information sharing systems that will be coming online in a couple years (or maybe even now) will allow another platform to fire on those targets without exposing themselves.
Currently seeing a lot of footage of Ukranian guided Turk Bayraktar drones doing insane damage on Russian convoys that would indicate yes .... yes the S-400 can be "beat".
😆 Western media propaganda tho... Fake news
@@mikeseal3053 lol I could link you to plenty of videos on shady websites showing Russian military hardware getting smacked in Ukraine, even shows the after effects of ruskies in a lot of different pieces haha. I seen on today of, a 4k video of a stinger smacking a Russian attack helicopter at 200ft then nose diving into the ground. Safe to say they needed to use dental records for identification. Or countless Russian tanks with the turrets blown off.. now that creates a erm a real mess
Next video , can Patriot be beat ?
Wait , it was , by low tech drones :)))
The problem with Patriot is the lack of a layered defence. HAWK, Roland/Rapier, Gepard etc. are either gone or where never part of the US system. The drones would work against the S400 but the Russians have short and mid range systems as well and integrate them. So the drone will likely be gunned down by a mobile 30mm gun.
Every time you plug kommandostore I end up blowing money. They fuckin rock.
Depends on the method pretty sure if you wanna take it out by air it isnt gonna be easy unless you have a bomb with a massive radius, and you drop it right outside the s400’s range but still have the s400 in range otherwise try shelling it from nearby maybe from ships if its on a coast or just use normal artillery from nearby, could also just do a funny by jamming radar or going in there and taking the out.
Forget about your stealth technology when dealing with the S-350 Vityaz, S-400 and S-500. These systems have more than one radar. There is also a Bistatic radar 52E6, which uses the location "on the lumen". During operation, the transmitter sends signals in the direction of the remote receiver. Static or moving objects are detected by the distortion of pulses reaching the receiver. Further, the radar automation is able to tie the route and transmit data to consumers.
Operators are a factor huh? There’s literally a “fuck everything in range” button on the S400 that even your basic infantryman can push, it’s a highly automated system when it needs to be.
One other way is to go in slow. The radars only shoot at fast targets. If they shoot at slow targets they would destroy their own cars and trucks. So in one of the Iraq wars the main Iraqi air defence radars was taken out by Apache helicopters flying slow instead of the faster F117 stealth bomber.
The radars do NOT care about speed. Also radar is facing the skies, if it detects a truck or car, someone’s crashed into the antenna 😂
I don’t know what example you’re referencing, but likely, the Apache’s survived due to the fact ground radars are highly susceptible to ”ground clutter” helicopters can stay close to the ground and thus are far less visible to radar.
@@moffatcam Do you know for sure (quote the instruction manual) or just guessing. It is not just cars but flock of birds and stuff thrown about by storms. And how do you explain the following:
To clear the way for the first airstrikes of the Gulf War, eight Apache helicopters had to covertly destroy Iraqi radar sites.
Why not use the F117 instead of the Apache?
Iraqi radars and system were stone age compare to the S400 system in 2021.
@@alberthenriette8976
"Also radar is facing the skies, " Now I know you do not know what you are talking. If the radar is facing the skies then fly low under the radar to attack .Most modern attack aircraft have terrian following
The most effective way to blind all radar over a very wide range for a serious attack whether conventional or nuclear is the nuclear blackout effect created by detonating nuclear weapons above the earth's atmosphere. It works by at least 3 methods, excitation of the ionosphere, excitation of the Van Allen radiation belts and EMP. the effect was discovered independently in 1962 by the US and USSR. So this is where the first explosions would occur. After that these systems and others that depend on radar won't take out a single midsile, warhead, or plane stealthy or not. So in a nuclear war even systems like S500 and S550 are useless. As Russian weapons become able to take out ICBMs in space during mid flight nuclear weapons may have to be stationed in orbit permanently ready to detonate without any warning.
If it’s Russian a sign saying bang will unfurl when it’s fired. Plus the wheels will fall off the lorry.
This assumes the Russian soldiers don’t run as soon as the FSB turns it’s back in them
after what we’ve seen in Ukraine, the S-400 is all bs!!😂 looks good on paper!
They have a cheap and easy solution.
Cheap decoy drones will be sent in high value area and drain the defense and also give away their location.
S-400/500 is really not that big problem.
Btw, they will have a very hard time getting weapons lock on F-22/35.
S-400 have in general been hyped by the russians to boost sales and propaganda.
Oh yes Doctor. You surely know everything. The only you don't know is that stealth was seen on radar before , lock on and busted.
What if enemy retaliate with fighter jet coupled with detector airplane as soon as s400 detects , it will give barely no time for any jet to survive , it'll be hunted down . The crux is it isn't easy to take down any defence system, it is always heavily guarded with fighter planes around.
Did US practice how to run away from battle field ? Without finishing anything they start ? 😆😆😆😆😂😆😂
We need an update
ATACMS after watching this video: CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!
The makers of S400 knows exactly what you are talking about and even more, they have been in the business for a long time. The success of S300 is a testament that S400 is a LETHAL WEAPON. and again lets also bring S500 into perspective.
yes so much success, if shooting civilian 747's is the goal....
long range sams are not lethal to modern fighter jets, but they force them to turn around and defend stoping them from their mission
To beat any ADA you swarm the battery with ARM’s while simultaneously launch against the primary target. The operator will decide to engage the ARM’s to preserve its battery’s operations for future engagements.
If the Russians see this happening, they will, like you say, use the missiles to defend against the ARMs.
The fighters attacking the primary target would be engaged by Migs.
2 Years on into the ruosko /Ukraine war and the S400 has proved itself to be a pile of junk. The only think this out of date joke missile has hit is a couple of its own sides aircraft, the ground, a shopping mall and itself! ( Boomeranged back and took its own launcer out).
So if anyone bought one of these, youve bought a lemon
Now i know why close and medium air defense are used thx a lot
Итого: можно ли побить с-400? Ответ: можно, наверное.
Скорее нет, чем можно наверное. Торы закроют любой спам дронов и низколетящих.
How does one find footage of the PrsMs animation by lockheed? Seems like something interesting and now that they've deleted it it sounds extra juicy
Seems the stat counters always fail to consider how a system actually works or consider tactics.
The air defense systems dome comes in layers, s300 s400 and s350, so weither you fly low or attack from two directions there always will be the second layer to beat, as for jamming, in general there's always a krasukha unit in so you need to stop being jammed in order to jam a signal.
The s400 will be complemented with medium range and short range nd quick reaction sams. The best way to destroy the s400 is to send a small platoon to infiltrate the enemy and destroy with bombs the most effective I think
Great staff, thank you. Attaking S400 means a full scale war and that means nuclear strikes by both sides. Not a great outcome. If anyone apart from the US will try to attack S400 site a result would be low. So all is the theory which is good.
Of course its all just theory. But it keeps the balance, no one should even consider that war is a viable possibility.
Very well done.
You have to use the same frequency as a radad use for jamming . So you have to know this frequency or just mirror incoming signals. But radad can use random frequency for every "ping" signal. Jamming will not work in this case: The first answer will be definetly correct, the next answers should be analized by computer with previous answers and compare them with potential positions (all aircrafts has speed limits) and we get only several potential targets.
To be honest I don't know how works real anit-jamming system this one I've just invented. But as a programmer I can say that it is pretty easy problem.
EPIC EPISODE AGIAN THANKS AND LOVE FROM PAKISTAN
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHA!!!!!! Today this looks like it mustve been an April Fools joke!!!! Hahahaha "Ooooooh NOOOOOO, the S-400 is invincible!!!" Yea, but only in the way that S- 500 was before it became a smoking heap.....
Very informative, thanks
The point is that an integrated and networked Russian air defense system that includes the S-400 cannot be defeated without a major SEAD strike, which would take weeks of planning and use up vast amounts of munitions. In Russia or Ukraine, it could not possibly be launched by surprise. If the strike is a failure, it cannot be repeated for a long, long time thanks to the munitions expenditures. The USA fired hundreds of anti-radiation missiles during the Bosnian War but never did succeed in completely suppressing the Serbian anti-air missile system. With factories and depots nearby, the Russians could repair or replace any damage to their missile systems very quickly.
So ua helis did
in This Video No Mention Some Other Ways to Beat Any Radar-ed Missile System:
1 - Moles Attack Missile (MAM) : this missile go to radar before enter "pop-up" (detected) range .. they Enter to Ground and dig to some level beond ground and at near of Radar the Rise from Ground and boom
2- Ortho Rain Missile (ORM) : This Missile go to radar before enter to pop-up zone they pull up the very high altited then fraction to 1/12 of gulf ball size with falling angle to Radar and broke it
3- Lens of God ( LOG) : This Missile is go high to sun angle to radar were be open as Lens and Burn Radar from Above
4- Road Runner Missile (RRM): This Missile go as suicide car with very fast and from street and have some machine gun to deal with gurd and enter area and exploed near radar
and a lot and lot (KLU) (ERB) (UUM) (ZRV) (OKS) ....
up
The machine is interesting but also if stationed in an air base there would be more than 2, so probably about 6 per air base.
Send decoy drones the size of a jet. or attack them with swarm of mini drones
For aircraft the answer is no since S400 can detect and lock its target from 600 km away. The S400 missile also have batter missile velocity 1200 m/s it means no chance for aircraft to hide, run or even manuvers. The system can be destroyed with longer range missile like Tomahawk, problem is the S400 can also lock and destroy those missile. S400 can just be disabled by manually murdering its crew or bribe with Benyamin Franklin' note.
The S400 has several types of missiles. The speed of the rockets is different, from 1000 m per second to 2500
What about the fact the air defense site is going to have its own jet fighters patrolling around as well
1,000,000 mini-tomahawks. Done.
In a word? Absolutely.
They are called "MISSILES" because they miss more often than they actually hit in reality. Otherwise, they might be called HITTLES... LOL.
The test of the pie is in the putting.
Got my money on ‘loitering Ammunition’ drones
careful the Ruskie fan boys are still sore in the rear after the Turks made their AA look a fool in Armenia.
The S400 has 3 radars but the short and medium range systems are im sure integrated, possibly with other search radars or passive radars .
The Turkish drone is not detectable to Russian radar.
Aircraft can be detected by radar. US constantly tries going to into Russian territory to see how far they can get undetected, and Russian pilots end up meeting them and escorting them out, typically before they are allowed to get too into Russian territory. Were you not aware of this? Also, s400 has been used in combat, uh, Syria? They have s400 defending the 2 military bases. Bunch of advanced drones attacked them.
I didnt hear anything about stealth missles like JASSM. How would S400 stop 1 or several of those?
seems it is easily beaten, not even standing chance against ATACMS
See you forgot to think about the tractors as the apex predator they are!
Well even if fly low... Ivan sure will threw vodka bottle at it
Thanx i will try this tomorrow in with f15
We have the s400 system it’s what we built the f35 around it’s in the high desert in palm dale
Saying all that it has not being put out there for a real test against real enemy.
Thank you for your awesome work!
Excellent information! Well explained!
So Radarjamming is actually throwing back the own signal multiple Times, this way they are overwhelmed by Information ?
Superb video. Thanks!