You are a very good teacher. You assumed students do not understand certain terms and explained them beautifully before moving on. This video is better than most videos I have seen on TH-cam because after watching it, I am confident in how to use Discriminant Analysis.
Finally!!! I have been searching for a simple method of calculating and interpreting discriminant validity. Thank you!!!! Now I can go to bed and continue putting my thoughts and responding to my research questions later.
Thank you for your video. It is really helpful. However, I have some questions, hope you could help me on this. 1) I have 7 indenpendent variables. When I ran the Tests of Equality of Group Means, only 4 of them show the sig. value < 0.05. From what I read, this means only those 4 variables has significant contribution to the discriminant model. THE QUESTION IS: Do I have to run the discriminant analysis again using only those 4 variables? 2) If not, how should I interpret the Standardized canonical discriminant function coefficients table? Do I only take into consideration the 4 variables only when assessing explanatory power. 3) For the Functions at group centroids table - How do we know if the discriminant score of he/she is falling to which side? Do we calculate the average to determine the neutral point, or always use 0 as the neutral point? Hope you clear my confusion. Thank you again, your video has been very helpful.
Thanks for the video madam, but just a suggestion, if you don't intend to explain all the output tables accurately then it's better to skip those parts rather than keeping them and not explaining what they are actually showing.
well I think in common sense, precision 50% is similar to a 50/50 choice. If the precision is below 50%, why would you waste time using that function if it's worse than doing a blind classification.
You are a very good teacher. You assumed students do not understand certain terms and explained them beautifully before moving on. This video is better than most videos I have seen on TH-cam because after watching it, I am confident in how to use Discriminant Analysis.
Thank you🙏
Finally!!! I have been searching for a simple method of calculating and interpreting discriminant validity. Thank you!!!! Now I can go to bed and continue putting my thoughts and responding to my research questions later.
Thank you
awesome... after watching a lot of useless videos, this helped me out
Thank you
Thank you so much, after struggling for long you made it possible for me today. God bless you!
Thank you🙏
Thank you so much. I love your pedagogy to explain this topic step-by-step.
Thank you🙏
Thank you maam, really helpful lecture
Thank you
you have nicely explained the analysis. thank you madam.
Thank you🙏
Very informational video thank you ma'am
It can be used in any decision making model.
It’s really helpful, Thank you madam
Thank you🙏
Thank you Madam.. very informative..
Thank you🙏
Thank you for your video. It is really helpful. However, I have some questions, hope you could help me on this.
1) I have 7 indenpendent variables. When I ran the Tests of Equality of Group Means, only 4 of them show the sig. value < 0.05. From what I read, this means only those 4 variables has significant contribution to the discriminant model. THE QUESTION IS: Do I have to run the discriminant analysis again using only those 4 variables?
2) If not, how should I interpret the Standardized canonical discriminant function coefficients table? Do I only take into consideration the 4 variables only when assessing explanatory power.
3) For the Functions at group centroids table - How do we know if the discriminant score of he/she is falling to which side? Do we calculate the average to determine the neutral point, or always use 0 as the neutral point?
Hope you clear my confusion. Thank you again, your video has been very helpful.
Thanks for this video.
Thank you🙏
Very nyc mam .. usefull ❤️
Thanks for the video madam, but just a suggestion, if you don't intend to explain all the output tables accurately then it's better to skip those parts rather than keeping them and not explaining what they are actually showing.
@@saurabhyadav-nu3mj ok Thank for suggestions i will take care these points in future
can you add your word doc as an attachment to the video so that it can be referred at last moment.
Sure I will attach
Where it is attached?
@@Ashulekhacan you send please
Interpretations are not clear
maam what if the dependent variables measured on 05 point likerts scale? my independent variable is metric.
can you provide this data so we can perform this practical in SPSS .
Sure I will provide
Do you have one on concurrent validity?
Do you have a soft copy of this presentation madam?
Ma'am if data is collected on likert scale for both dependent and independent variables, what should we use logistic regression or discrimant analysis
that should be linear regression, i suppose
why the precision of the discriminant function must be above 50%?
well I think in common sense, precision 50% is similar to a 50/50 choice. If the precision is below 50%, why would you waste time using that function if it's worse than doing a blind classification.