Cancelled Nickel Trades on the LME

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024
  • In markets, there are few principles considered more important by traders than the idea that when a commitment to a deal is made, it should stand come what may.
    So, there was uproar in the commodities market last week over the London Metal Exchange’s decision to bring the global nickel market to a halt and cancel futures trades because of a “short squeeze” on a Chinese tycoon facing potential billions of dollars of losses.
    In one of the most controversial moments in its 145-year history, the LME cancelled an entire days’ worth of trades after a near doubling of the price of nickel, a metal used in stainless steel and electric vehicle batteries.
    The rally, partially sparked off by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, had left Xiang Guangda, the tycoon behind Tsingshan Holding, China’s leading stainless steel and nickel manufacturing group, unable to meet demands for extra cash on a huge bearish bet that backfired. The LME believes that if had it forced the settlement of the trades, it would have bankrupted some of its smaller members and its decision was “in the interests of the market as a whole”.
    In today’s video we look at what happened in the nickel market and how it is working itself out.
    Patrick's Books:
    Statistics For The Trading Floor: amzn.to/3eerLA0
    Derivatives For The Trading Floor: amzn.to/3cjsyPF
    Corporate Finance: amzn.to/3fn3rvC
    Patreon Page: / patrickboyleonfinance
    Visit our website: www.onfinance.org
    Follow Patrick on Twitter Here: / patrickeboyle
    Patrick Boyle On Finance Podcast:
    Spotify: open.spotify.c...
    Apple: podcasts.apple...
    Google Podcasts: tinyurl.com/62...
    Join this channel to support making this content:
    / @pboyle

ความคิดเห็น • 937

  • @PBoyle
    @PBoyle  2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Thanks to our growing list of Patreon Sponsors and Channel Members for supporting the channel. www.patreon.com/PatrickBoyleOnFinance
    : Marc De Mesel, Annie Chen, Nate Stapleton,Timothy Baird, WIlam, Hernan Merino, Random Encounter, Nieuwsbrief Ikwil, Bee Positive Consulting, hyunjung Kim, John Cadena, Ian Tracey, Callum McLean, Oscar, Simon Pena, Ed, Pavle Obradovic, Erik Van Ekelenburg, David O'Connor, Pjotr Bekkering, Alex, Robert W Proudfoot, pooh shmoo, Robert Muller, Andre Michel, Ivan Iliev, Gopaljee Atulya, Milan Tomic, Mark Hooker, Artem Vasenin, P H, Sebastian, Michal Lacko, Peter Bočan, Michael Pierce, V Jordan, Gil, HalfwitHam, Mark Brophy, Patrick T, David Urdenata, Juan Valdez, Bruce Roberts, Chad Norman, Bruce Roberts, Shamikh Rana, Friday Guy, Marc De Mesel, Augusto Ramos, Soy Boomer Doomer, Bob Slartabartfast, Robert Feiler, Camil Dbouk, Erik Montesinos, Matthew Loos, Az Indragiri, Aman Bali, Lautaro Parada, Pratap, Deborah Joseph, Robin Sung, Kurt Johnston, Dominik Auerbach, Gurmeet Kaushal, John Hall, Dara Mo, Josef Goergen, Wilbert Cheng, Daniel Talero, Jaroslav Tupý, Trevor Lucey JB Weld, Alex, Sunny, Carlos Figuera, Peter Pomelov, Null065, Rick Thor, MeBerzerk, Henry Nguyen, Sola F, The Collier, Carlos Mejia, J Wadia, Bitcoin OG, easy boekhouding, Albert, Eugene Jung, Oisin Quinn, Daniel Cervini, Jonathon Yong, Iris Ji, Emil Nicolaie Perhinschi, Charles, Gerard Scott Eli Auto, Excks, Michael Li, Par Hedman, Praveen Mishra, Gerard Scott, joel köykkä, Areeb Ahmed, David Wang, Yazan Qaraqish, Rodolfo Cornetti, Daniel Winroth, johnny, Nick Jerrat, Chris Houston, Alastair Currie, Robert Griffin, Andrei, zizi Golo, Fab Vida, Constantin Petrenco, pawel irisik, NotAScam, James Halliday, 22 Dust, Carsten Baukrowitz, Heinrich, Arron T, Ben Brown, Stephen Mortimer (to The Moon), Ryan B. Hicks, B S, Liam, Logan Vrankovic, William Heaton, Paul McCourt, Daniel, Aaryan Koura, Steven, Christopher Boersma, Ulf Lundblad, Dorothy Watson, Greg Blake, Simon Bone, Livermores Quant, The Collier Report, Scott Gardner, The Man Koala, Brian McCullough, Daniel S. Smith, Finance Student, Milton Danielsson, Julie, Mohammad Rehman, James Wallace, Daniel Poellmann, Edosa Odigie, Dixon Yuen, Marek Novák, Stamatis Drepaniotis Michael Smith, Ahmed Hamadto, Chris Davey, Mike Farmwald, Michael A. Mayo, Lachezar Georgiev, Kamet Batra, Bradley Johnson, Sagar Gudi, Michael Chessar, Kate ATL, Tong Cheung, Lady Dje, James Barnes, Chris Hall, Kurt Johnston, ICBM Catcher Juan Valdes, KernelSC, Josh Garcia, Linn Engström, Veltsh, Konrad P-kala, Pastacat, Adam Vorting, Matthew McQuade, Christopher Lesner, freebird, Kenneth WedMore Lund, erfective, Jason Young, Jonathan Kopnick, Peter Hendrickson, steel, MM420, Bastien, Tom Willett, Chris Whitehead, Anil Jason, JOJO, Jason Butterley, AS7, Greg Thatcher, Ezekiel Templin, Robert M Daily, MrLuigi1138 Grecia Bate, Leszek Frankowski, Nam Nguyen, Goutham, Karim THIBAULT, C, David R. Ingemi, Robert Wave, Dmitri Alexeev, Aaron Rose, Ethan Hernandez, Brett Turley, Claude Chevroulet, Adrian, Stephan Marosvary, Yigit Yargili Louis Julien, Jan Lukas Kiermeyer, Gearoid O Connor, Fredrick Saupe, Subliminal Transformation, Jason Horton, Alex McMahon, Adi, Ben, Kurt Mueller, Joaquin Madruga, Janusz Wieczorek, Federico Viscomi, Corgi, Mahdi, Burgerinn, Quinn Cone, Sam Doyle, QiKaiQian, Stephen, Joshua Rosenthal, Timotej Zat’ko, Frank Yashar, Michael Smith, Emilian Marius Tudor, Julian Aßmann, Cormac, Max Kaye, Ian Shearer, Theodosius the Elder, Michael Kopřiva, Tinni, Goran Milivojevic, chris, Daniel Mooney, Joe Del Vicario, Alexandre Mah, ultima9, Norman A. Letterman, maRiano polidoRi, Andrew Steinborn, Stephan Prinz, Gary Yrag, Mark, Mattia Midali, Matthew Berry, Ann Williams, Jay T, Gabor, Florian Haas, Shivendra Saklani, Zachary Tu, Jeffrey, Lane Alan Deyoe, Chett Flynn Jonathan Horn, Andrei-Gabriel, Mo Herbert, Lane Andrews, Justin Thuet, Olaf Thiele, Ivan Ilaev, Todd Gross, Andrea Russo, Douglas Caldwell, Devere, Wade Hobbs, Volodymyr Palii, James Hoctor, Gavotti SGP, Ryne Davis, Jean-Philippe Lemoussu, Keanu Thierolf, Grizzly Grey Bear, Muhammad, Michael Chow, Stefan Alexander, James Blandford, Miroslav Ognyanov, Scott Guthery, Vanya Davidenko, Oswaldo Caraballo Fermin, Arto Karhu, James Bache, EJ, Jason Harner, Cameron Batko, Dale Patch, Stefan Penner, Mick Jasny, Robin Talbot, Mischa Trunz, Arvid, Andre, Eric, Jonathan Metter, Niandis and Yoshinao Kumagai

    • @tunahxushi4669
      @tunahxushi4669 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      AMC is a Chinese controlled company. They sold off some actual stock but maintained complete control of the company itself. Since 100% of the company is actually CCP owned, more investigation is needed.

    • @depreciatingasset
      @depreciatingasset 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Law suit? Crowdfund a lawsuit? Divest LME from foreigners

    • @depreciatingasset
      @depreciatingasset 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't think even lawsuits will get people their money. Bcz ccp owns the queen the royalty and all politicians moms in the west are w.hõřes of Xi and the million ccp members

    • @Ppp.9826
      @Ppp.9826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi, Cushlamush Irish Green for those magnates of Metaling cute hoors.🍀 don't put up with this.. Even though you may not see I still have a itsy bitsy crush on you don't blow your big head up futher your not my god patrick your my equal. even if you like girls or boys. oops forcasting that feeling. (Privately saying,) Public i had to take a hand fan out My laced fan from China to cool me off. oh pat your no good I had a thought thats all.Your Not a Enterprise.i love your semi dipples kind of cushlamush or is it malush, Malus.

    • @chandrachauhan4068
      @chandrachauhan4068 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You have a spammer in the comments section Patrick. I will block some but maybe warn others about it.

  • @tiagogferreira
    @tiagogferreira 2 ปีที่แล้ว +726

    In the future this channel will be regarded as a documentary about the slow descent into madness of a professional trader during our roaring 20s. Love your content Patrick :)

    • @thomas316
      @thomas316 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Let's be honest, we always knew markets where essentially Numberwang. 😆

    • @1MinuteFlipDoc
      @1MinuteFlipDoc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@thomas316 "markets" are just too lucrative to not be gamed/fixed by insiders.

    • @whazzat8015
      @whazzat8015 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      So disturbing it made him blink.

    • @Lawofimprobability
      @Lawofimprobability 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But in this case, the roaring is anger, not the speed of the economy.

    • @PGG98
      @PGG98 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@1MinuteFlipDoc except the lunacy we've been seeing these past few years has exponentially increased with real life effects. It's almost like an exodus

  • @vengefulspirit99
    @vengefulspirit99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +420

    When you owe the bank a million dollars, it's your problem. When you owe the bank a billion dollars, it's the bank's problem.

    • @dansplain2393
      @dansplain2393 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Aka when you owe the bank a million dollars, they got you by the balls. When you owe the bank a billion dollars, you got them by the balls :)

    • @rkan2
      @rkan2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +96

      ...When you owe the bank a hundred billion dollars, it's the taxpayer's problem.

    • @bullseye0900
      @bullseye0900 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please explain

    • @Daft_Sage
      @Daft_Sage ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@bullseye0900 Because a small enough loss has a negative impact on your ability to do business. A big enough loss affects the banks ability to do business. A really big loss affects the economic stability of the country.

  • @Meowmeow.age.6
    @Meowmeow.age.6 2 ปีที่แล้ว +563

    Halting trading is fine. Going back in time to cancel trades is BS.
    It is hard to trust these markets. Every market is a war zone and I don't want a plunge protection team stepping in on a crash or a short squeeze.

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      only sensible reasons is when the market glitches, ie when price discovery is wrong not due to trades (it is never wrong due to trades) but to technical factors IMO

    • @tunahxushi4669
      @tunahxushi4669 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      ? BS ? The Chinese banks didn't want to lose money. The firm that controls the trading is Chinese. There's nothing BS to the CCP since it's the way the mafia CCP ALWAYS operates. It would be BS if this exchange operated honestly, but of course it can't it's Chinese. Very simple because this is the standard operating procedure of the CCP. Instead of being confused, people need to read up on what China is, a mafia.

    • @Sunny25611
      @Sunny25611 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Gambling’s gambling. Insider trading is also a gamble and very few are ever busted for it.

    • @caligulapontifex5759
      @caligulapontifex5759 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@benchoflemons398 Wait until this happens at the COMEX. If the big players are looking at same billions in loses COMEX would do the exact same thing.

    • @drsgme69
      @drsgme69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      LME is a complete joke of an exchange

  • @HT-vd4in
    @HT-vd4in 2 ปีที่แล้ว +167

    In which world can you just reverse trades? This is completely corrupt!

    • @Lawofimprobability
      @Lawofimprobability 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Mistaken trades have been cancelled in some stock trades (such as mistakenly confusing the number of shares with the price of shares) and different exchanges have adopted different rules to deal with mistakes or suspected market chaos. Being able to reverse trades offers some protection against the routine risk of human error but raises the risk of favoritism.
      In most cases, the risks of favoritism are low BUT this case is being mentioned because it is really, really suspicious. Don't assume most reversed trades are this dubious.

    • @tunahxushi4669
      @tunahxushi4669 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      In the Chinese world you can do anything. Black is white, up is down. The CCP is a mafia, this is how any mafia works. Do not be surprised, dig a little deeper, expect this type of behavior in the future.. always. This is standard operating procedure for the CCP.

    • @runningforglory
      @runningforglory 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tunahxushi4669 are you in China rn?

    • @Zunidrap
      @Zunidrap 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In the world where corrupt China is allowed to do whatever they want, that is, our world.

    • @ripvanrevs
      @ripvanrevs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@tunahxushi4669 At first I thought you were talking about the United States democratic party.

  • @daddyw1719
    @daddyw1719 2 ปีที่แล้ว +422

    Congrats to those little guys who made millions going long, while risking it all. Then finding out 24-hours your exchange decided to change-the-rules in play, and wipe out your gains to bail out the big-guy. RIP guys...

    • @itemushmush
      @itemushmush 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      i'm getting 2008 "too big to fail" vibes from this!

    • @LLlap
      @LLlap 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Oh those poor war profiteers!

    • @ReneSalasDesign
      @ReneSalasDesign 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      We need to get rid of these intermediaries and develop decentralized exchanges.

    • @gickygackers
      @gickygackers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@LLlap you make no money

    • @coolworx
      @coolworx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@LLlap So you support corporate welfare and bailouts?

  • @matty1234a1
    @matty1234a1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +572

    "We're definitely not helping china" *wipes out 7 billion in losses for a Chinese state own foundry*

    • @mikeindigo2808
      @mikeindigo2808 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Agree it’s ridiculous. We are helping them killing us

    • @georgeo162
      @georgeo162 2 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      Exactly. That China was able to corrupt an entire exchange is frightening, and regulators need to act.

    • @cy20998
      @cy20998 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      It also wiped out their own losses. Who do you think pays if short losses aren’t paid? It’s actually the broker’s fault for not controlling for this in the first place. This is like blaming home buyers instead of the banks for the 2008 crisis.

    • @smokelord2002
      @smokelord2002 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@georgeo162 have you seen usa exchanges? They get massively manipulated daily to siphon wealth from everyday citizens and sec doesnt bat a eye. Lol cry me a river. All exchanges or markets are manipulated.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@georgeo162 don't assume this particular case was due a bribe, though.

  • @somewhere6
    @somewhere6 2 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    Unbelievable manipulation and favouritism. Thanks for this clear report.

  • @jaymacpherson8167
    @jaymacpherson8167 2 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    A Chinese for-profit company owns the exchange. The biggest loser would be a Chinese company that is the biggest nickel producer on earth, whose biggest lender is a Chinese state-owned bank. Why do I think the “regulators” will at most issue a fine that is a tiny fraction of the trades that were cancelled?

    • @tunahxushi4669
      @tunahxushi4669 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The simplest answer is usually the correct one. The CCP controls this exchange. The CCP has chosen not to burn $8 billion, why would it? 100% of contracts from the CCP Chinese have not been honored. It's not amazing what happened, it's only amazing that people are shocked.

    • @jaymacpherson8167
      @jaymacpherson8167 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tunahxushi4669 Thank you for confirming my presumption.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No. If there's a definitive kickback established London will more than likely coerce Chinese state-backed companies to divest their shares in LME. This will infuriate Beijing, so expect retalliation in kind.

    • @jaymacpherson8167
      @jaymacpherson8167 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DG-wr6cl Did you click “view all replies?”

  • @Kevin_Street
    @Kevin_Street 2 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    I can't imagine making a twenty-five-million dollar profit and having some organization say "Nope, that's cancelled now like it never happened." It certainly shakes one's confidence in the exchange itself as a safe place to invest.

    • @DanOneOne
      @DanOneOne ปีที่แล้ว

      welcome to "fair capitalism!". Where you lose, it's on you, when we lose, we cancel your trade... Everything is fake

    • @alexanderSydneyOz
      @alexanderSydneyOz ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's not "investment". We are talking about professional, corporate, speculators. They are not looking for safety.

    • @user-fb7ym2fk5h
      @user-fb7ym2fk5h ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@alexanderSydneyOz They are looking for a moderate safety. Otherwise it is gambling. Professionals don't gamble. Btw since when speculation is a bad thing to do?

    • @MrSmokinDragon
      @MrSmokinDragon ปีที่แล้ว

      Taking long or short positions are speculation, not investment.

    • @user-fb7ym2fk5h
      @user-fb7ym2fk5h ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@MrSmokinDragon you would be surprised, but speculation defined as investment.

  • @thecupcakeman3087
    @thecupcakeman3087 2 ปีที่แล้ว +292

    The Great Nickel Pickle of 2022

    • @nobody.123
      @nobody.123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      It’s only the first *Quarter,* and problems are a *Dime* a dozen. It makes no *Cents!*

    • @iworkforwendys
      @iworkforwendys 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      pickle Rick, funniest shit I've ever seen

    • @RixRunIt
      @RixRunIt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Amazing

    • @asap9779
      @asap9779 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@iworkforwendys nobody even mentioned pickle Rick yet we're all thinking it

    • @whazzat8015
      @whazzat8015 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Redickleous

  • @LouisHansell
    @LouisHansell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +104

    Expecting a gold mining company to be mining gold is very 20th century.

  • @Witnessmoo
    @Witnessmoo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +191

    LME should never have done this and I don’t understand how they even could do it considering that traders formed contracts at the point where the offer was accepted. You can’t just reverse that… I think there will be a decade of Litigation from this. And LME could actually go belly up

    • @mvpfocus
      @mvpfocus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      _Should_ go belly up. You can't have an exchange with their thumb firmly on the scales. It's a farce.

    • @TheHighborn
      @TheHighborn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      i actually see no reason why traders or anybody would continue using the LME forward.

    • @jchrizzy6995
      @jchrizzy6995 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JESSEDIGI i feel like every important decision is just by two rich dicks somewhere

    • @AsurmenHandOfAsur
      @AsurmenHandOfAsur 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sue the shite out them!

    • @0xCAFEF00D
      @0xCAFEF00D 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Suspicion against the UK rising sharply considering other suspect events during this time.
      Surely this will be settled in UK courts too.
      I don't think they'll get any out of LME.

  • @NOLA-vv3sz
    @NOLA-vv3sz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +156

    This action by the LME turned our metals group upside down. The unwillingness to allow a market to collapse and firms to close just adds more powder to a keg that always blows up eventually. It will just be a bigger explosion later. No one is willing to accept the pain now. It is always kicking the can further. That is not to minimize the pain we would feel today if we let these systems collapse. It would be horrible. But kicking the can just makes the eventual explosion biblical instead of horrible. As it stands, we have to find a new place to hedge metals.

    • @marvelcomiks8078
      @marvelcomiks8078 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      There is a difference. If it explodes now, those holding that can will die. But if the can is kicked down the road others get to die too!

    • @dosgos
      @dosgos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Before this debacle, other exchanges might have been reluctant to step into LME's nickel business. I suppose the LME opened the door to nickel...and all the other products it traded. I think that would be a logistical nightmare. At least the lawyers will keep busy reworking public and private contracts.

    • @drsgme69
      @drsgme69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      LME is a joke ffs

    • @dosgos
      @dosgos 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@drsgme69 It certainly was a centre of global commerce for a long time. One mistake could end it all.

    • @whazzat8015
      @whazzat8015 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@marvelcomiks8078 Kicking the can down the road?
      Maybe.
      But worse yet it won't be galvanized, or plated.

  • @dosgos
    @dosgos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    With the lost in trust, I wonder if the LME will be viable going forward. The big investment banks and funds can not allow this precedent to become the norm.

    • @rosen9425
      @rosen9425 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It already is. The LME does whatever it wants to protect whoever they serve, and gets away with it

    • @joemerino3243
      @joemerino3243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The big investors are probably the ones getting the LME to do this.

    • @AsurmenHandOfAsur
      @AsurmenHandOfAsur 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@joemerino3243 No it's Tsingshan and the HKEX (which is controlled by the CCP). The CCP probably ordered this trade halt at the LME to limit their losses on bailing out Tsingshan!

    • @joemerino3243
      @joemerino3243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@AsurmenHandOfAsur I bet the CCP is a pretty big investor.

    • @hugooliveira4440
      @hugooliveira4440 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is the norm already. When a virgin woman gets banged she will never be a vigin again

  • @InvestToLive
    @InvestToLive 2 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    On this day in history, a Nickel became a Dime.

  • @johnpatrick1588
    @johnpatrick1588 2 ปีที่แล้ว +243

    It all means not a free market. Different rules for some. Seems to show the LME is operating a flawed business model.

    • @Erik-ko6lh
      @Erik-ko6lh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      A Chinese finger is on the scale.

    • @xEnder515
      @xEnder515 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      That's because free markets don't exist and never have.
      Markets have always been influenced by govts and always will. Every market is a regulated market. It's not free. Nothing is free

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@xEnder515 otc or dark pools are mostly without government regulation. You find your counterpart and you trade what you want at the price you want. Exchanges are regulated by their own nature. I really don't get your point.

    • @xEnder515
      @xEnder515 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@chemicalfrankie1030
      Free markets never existed and never will. That's the point.
      Nothing is free 👍

    • @EFCasual
      @EFCasual 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The market exists only insofar as it serves power and thus it is aligned to power.

  • @ashishpatel350
    @ashishpatel350 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    inother words the chinese benefited from manipulating the markets in their favor. they might as well move the lme to china if they want to cancel legitimate trades.

    • @richardbloemenkamp8532
      @richardbloemenkamp8532 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think the LME is owned by the Honk Kong Government. So maybe technically they are Chinese. I think that legal consequences of this action will either result in in a reverse of the decision or a collapse of the LME.

    • @ashishpatel350
      @ashishpatel350 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardbloemenkamp8532 china took over hong kong and purged anyone that wanted democracy

  • @samsonsoturian6013
    @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    A bigger question is if owners of the LME exchange personally made bets on nickle. If so, it's textbook insider trading.

    • @Sunny25611
      @Sunny25611 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes it is.

    • @Kredeidi
      @Kredeidi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How about this Tsingshang literally betting against nickel because "hey we gonna produce lots of it in the future"? Why isnt that called insider trading?

    • @jesselivermore2291
      @jesselivermore2291 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Kredeidi thats insurance.

    • @alexanderSydneyOz
      @alexanderSydneyOz ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Kredeidi "How about this Tsingshang literally betting against nickel because "hey we gonna produce lots of it in the future"? Why isnt that called insider trading?"
      Seriously, is this question a joke? You are referring to producer hedging. ie the *specific* reason for which futures exchanges exist.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kredeidi Because Tsingshang didn't own LME. It was a Chinese state backed venture, and a different Chinese state backed venture owned LME, hence why they're being treated as affiliated entities while having no explicit ownership.

  • @michaelfernandez3182
    @michaelfernandez3182 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Patrick Boyle is hands down one of the most compelling, entertaining, and thorough teachers ive watched. He makes really conplex topic easy to understand. I feel like i learn a lot from him and often find myself laughing out loud at his jokes.

  • @critterfritter69
    @critterfritter69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    What's the moral of this story? Robinhood was American. LME is Chinese. There is no free market. A truly free market would allow anyone, big or small to get wiped out on the fickle fingers of fate, a true casino. It should not care if one individual got crushed, or entire economies go in the tank and civil war breaks out.

    • @waszkreslem9306
      @waszkreslem9306 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The assumptiom that short squeeze was something just normal is a wishful thinking. Good that LME cancelled trades as it would had another hit on inflation.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you believed that you wouldn't be here.

    • @TheMountainBeyondTheWoods
      @TheMountainBeyondTheWoods 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Robinhood stopped trading, they didn't reverse them, there's a huge difference there.

    • @TheMountainBeyondTheWoods
      @TheMountainBeyondTheWoods 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Steve L I wasn't trying to excuse what Robinhood did, I don't use or even like them, I was pointing out that what the LME did is much worse.

    • @aby0ni
      @aby0ni 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I love this comment 😂

  • @Hawking1969
    @Hawking1969 2 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    Patrick, you are the only adult in Financial TH-cam. Don't change, and thank you.

    • @Professional_Youtube_Commenter
      @Professional_Youtube_Commenter 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      make a course for $1000/month, golden vip platinum exclusive coaching programme, just 3 spots left, buy in 3 minutes to secure your spot.

  • @freedom7995
    @freedom7995 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Thank you for the video! If anyone knows of a class action lawsuit that retail investors can join, specifically people who lost not only their profits but their actual investments in Nickel via ETPs, ETFs, ETNs or futures , because of the LME actions - please post details of legal firms to be contacted. One would think LME cancellations are illegal and that FCA and PRA would help people who have been wrongly make to lose billions!

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Are retail investors allowed on the LME?

    • @AsurmenHandOfAsur
      @AsurmenHandOfAsur 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The LME is Chinese owned so this is why they stopped trading. They where limiting the liability to the CCP.

  • @bobboberson5755
    @bobboberson5755 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    When you remove the unlimited risk of a short you destroy price discovery.

    • @hume1234561
      @hume1234561 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How so? Shorting should be made illegal.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's called an ITM put.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hume1234561 how so? It has the same effect as put buying. In fact, you can perfectly replicate the exact risk/reward of a short using options.

    • @macicoinc9363
      @macicoinc9363 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@hume1234561 If you can't bet against something that is rotten, then the whole world would smell like a dumpster.

  • @mikemian
    @mikemian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    When you own the exchange, you make the rules. Clearly a partisan move by an owner that doesn't understand how markets work and got caught.

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Sure thing, but traders can decide to ditch that exchange for someone more reliable. it is wired they did not provide any explanation on why they cancelled the trades. I mean, if it happens once, it could well happen again in the future!

    • @joeblow9657
      @joeblow9657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      TFW you should limit foreign ownership but don't and pay the price

    • @joeblow9657
      @joeblow9657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Carl-hs420a The term you're referring to is high treason and yes we should

    • @TheMountainBeyondTheWoods
      @TheMountainBeyondTheWoods 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joeblow9657 Indeed, the west has gone insane, adversarial foreign powers should never ever have so much control of your financial system.

    • @joeblow9657
      @joeblow9657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheMountainBeyondTheWoods It's like the Soviet Union buying the London Stock exchange but without the safety of mutually assured destruction. IMO excess immigration and the whoring out of institutions like universities, real estate markets, regulators, and finance markets is disgraceful.

  • @skyplanet9858
    @skyplanet9858 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Your subtle sarcasm is epic 😂

  • @honeyisaac
    @honeyisaac 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    UK gov should look into LME

    • @kevinford6420
      @kevinford6420 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      They are in bed with the crooks

    • @stateofopportunity1286
      @stateofopportunity1286 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Narrator: They didn't.

    • @lauriebarns9901
      @lauriebarns9901 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This scope for this sort of "questionable dealing" was a major driver behind a certain segment of support for BREXIT. Rees Mogg represents the public face of it.

    • @David-ud9ju
      @David-ud9ju 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stateofopportunity1286 That's not true. The FCA launched an investigation, which was presumably closed with no wrong doing found as I can't find a follow up and the LME were taken to court by Elliot and Jane Street and the judges ruled that the LME had acted within their regulated power and done nothing wrong.

  • @WojciechP915
    @WojciechP915 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I work in an industry that uses lots of stainless steel. Our products are required to be "free from Cuban nickel". Apparently Cuba has some of the largest nickel resererves.

  • @user-us2bp3fz8i
    @user-us2bp3fz8i 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Remember the dudes tried the same thing with silver in the 80s? How did that go for them

    • @bunnystrasse
      @bunnystrasse 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hunt brothers hahahah

  • @nitsuanew
    @nitsuanew 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    LME is one of the weirdest exchanges. Buys and sells of a same contract don’t offset until the prompt data/expiration. It creates a box position.

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I imagine it is due to the nature of its main participants, commodities producers who need to hedge their product vs pure financial hedging

    • @nitsuanew
      @nitsuanew 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@chemicalfrankie1030 that’s fair. The producers and manufacturers don’t necessarily have the cash to close out a contract before prompt dates. For me, the idle profit is cash that isn’t earning any interest.

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nitsuanew that's a good point

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Weird "arbitrage opportunities" ensue...

  • @zuluwarrior2888
    @zuluwarrior2888 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    LME needs to be sued into the ground. Regulators need to force divestment of lme from the chinese.

  • @andreasbucher7717
    @andreasbucher7717 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Gold, historys oldest meme investment." - Patrick Boyle
    Very well put.

  • @seancraig8711
    @seancraig8711 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You are my favorite economics channel on TH-cam and I wish I could meet more people like you.
    Thank you for making videos that help me learn and grow.

  • @danpartridge7339
    @danpartridge7339 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Well done Patrick, another great explanation . But what did anyone expect when you have Administrators with very little market experience running these exchanges. Why was the Whale allowed to run the LME nickle pit for his own benefit ??? And why did they open the the market that day , it was very obvious something bad was going to happen. But to cancel the days trading !!! unbelievable. If I was a member firm i would demand my fees back and move to OTC trading . RIP the LME.

  • @chemicalfrankie1030
    @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    thanks for the video!! some comments.
    1. still not clear why LME cancelled the trades - the reputational damage is huge. Halting it or providing bands is (questionable but) fine, since it does not change the rules after he fact. Can anyone has any insight on why they did it?
    2. OTC contracts are not a problem per se, due to their nature. Counterparts almost always find a solution.
    3. is LME the only exchange for nickel price discovery? if it is traded (not OTC) somewhere else, why isn't the other price used (de facto making irrelevant their trading suspensions or bands - traders would just wait using another exchange as benchmark
    4. very interesting how LME differentiate from other exchanges thanks to their warehouse capabilities, I was not aware of that!

    • @rkan2
      @rkan2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It wants to suck the producer's dicks and says fu to pure speculators...

    • @vsync
      @vsync 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      China doesn't care about reputation in the same way the West does

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Steve L I checked where nickel is traded after having watched this video (I'm not familiar with commodity trading I admit) and apparently CME does not trade Nickel and to trade Nickel in Shanghai, the other major avaible exchange for Nickel, you need to be affiliated with a Chinese entity... Coincidence??!! 11

    • @nurgle11
      @nurgle11 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Steve L Australian nickel production comes in behind Russia, Philippines and Indonesia at about 10-13% of Global production, significant but not major.

  • @AoCabo
    @AoCabo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    An exchange canceling trades is absolutely absurd and wildly inappropriate. It's shameful

  • @KL-nj9oe
    @KL-nj9oe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Please keep us informed on this fiasco. Thanks!

  • @colddogs
    @colddogs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    a classic case of rules for thee, not for me

  • @JackDuffley
    @JackDuffley 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Moves like this make you wonder what you really "own"

    • @stapleman007
      @stapleman007 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You will own nothing, and you will be happy!

  • @qn5947
    @qn5947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    The Elites in LME cancelling all the trades to help the Chinese short sellers.

    • @tunahxushi4669
      @tunahxushi4669 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Chinese own the exchange. The only shocking thing is that anybody is shocked. This is standard operating procedure for the CCP Chinese. No due diligence? Stop engaging in activities with the Chinese and this will stop happening.

  • @mikecain6947
    @mikecain6947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A great video. I at least follow these when you do them. You really know how to explain difficulty subjects.

    • @mikecain6947
      @mikecain6947 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @♜þinned ßy Patrick Boylҽ My pleasure, both informative and entertaining.

    • @Leshic2
      @Leshic2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mikecain6947 I thought nobody get's fooled by those cat fish, scam accounts.
      I've been proven wrong.
      Pay more attention when it "looks like" the "real account".
      Scammers get very creative, and when you see them, report them to help others.

  • @SpaceTimeTurtle
    @SpaceTimeTurtle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    LME: hey Gamestop bois... hold my beer!!
    Thank you Patrick for a wonderfully hilarious summary.
    :):)

  • @marvelcomiks8078
    @marvelcomiks8078 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Imagine if they can do this even now without any tinge of shame, how much WORSE if they become the world currency? Its going to be mayhem.

  • @TheMrFishnDucks
    @TheMrFishnDucks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is hilarious. Looking forward to how this turns out. Nice video. Keep up the good work.

  • @Fr.VeniceLAI
    @Fr.VeniceLAI 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    LME, balatantly, cancelling Nickel Trades retroactively on, Tuesday, March-8, 2022, I think, has the effect not only just tarnished LME's credbility and reputation as a credible metal trading platform/exchange, but also more seriously impacted the creditability of HongKong & HKGEXchange, as a financial trading center & TradingHub in Asia. The reputation of HKG Exchange is worth and valued at ca. USD6.0 TRILLION, Th4, losing a couple of Billions$ for the Master, in order to maintain LME steadfastness and credibility, ultimately would have been fully justified. Now, the damage is done and may not be recovered.

  • @jonc67uk
    @jonc67uk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    All looking a bit broken isn't it. No such thing as a free market apparently, which isn't exactly a shock.

  • @mulemule
    @mulemule 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Once again, Patrick methodically and *factually* reveals the absurdly biased and crooked joke of "free markets."

  • @jillianonthehudson1739
    @jillianonthehudson1739 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love this. Wonderfully detailed and interesting breakdown, and hilarious at the same time. All boxes checked. Thank you

  • @lukefreeborn4923
    @lukefreeborn4923 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    No matter how many mistakes you make or how slow you progress in trading you're still way ahead of everyone who isn't trying

    • @fayehervig8914
      @fayehervig8914 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      or who quite after the first bad experience! the falling 97-99% are not a myth! it is logical

    • @Lily-en2ry
      @Lily-en2ry 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      People try their luck when they are scared to loose their money or have failed during the past and that's me making a loss of €4,670 last year October on crypto investments but not till I was referred to Mr Jurgen bright a rare and Trusted crypto expert trader who helped me recover all my losses and made extra profit for me

    • @Lily-en2ry
      @Lily-en2ry 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Investwithjurgen😊😊😊

    • @Lily-en2ry
      @Lily-en2ry 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      on te le gra m📧..️👆👆

    • @michellegeraldine9372
      @michellegeraldine9372 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      With Jūrgen's guidance and teachings I've learnt not to sell in a panic when everything goes down and not to buy in euphoria when everything goes up, I advice y'all to forget prediction and start making a good profit now because future valuations are all speculations and guesses. The market is very unstable and cannot tell if is going bearish or bullish while myself and others are trading without fear of making a lose while others are being patient for the price to skyrocket, it all depends on the pattern you follow and the one handling your trades, I'm surprised seeing a comment about Jürgen really he's an honest and the best crypto trader

  • @davids949
    @davids949 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks once again!
    What a tangled web we do weave... I found one of the more interesting comments you made starting around 9:10 and going to 9:20. To paraphrase... this could devastate the global medals markets... As much as I like the image of the LME and brokers sitting on a yacht having a discussion about what to do I nevertheless wonder if there are larger concerns involved with those conversations too. Beyond just China. Say the EU and the US for starters? The issue that keeps flashing through my mind is that the present economic system has been corrupted, mismanaged, and this has been done so by greed and Central planners. However as much as I want some concept of free markets and natural market forces to rule I am nevertheless left with the central problem of how do we extricate ourselves from this present quasi reality in an orderly fashion without crushing the living capacity of half the world? Put another way... I have an Uncle who is a communist. He has for his entire career worked for government and through pension and healthcare is dependent upon government. He complains about the petrodollar at every given opportunity for years. The only time I can get him to shut up on the subject is when I remind him that without the Petro dollar his butt would be in a sling as there would be no capacity for the government to employ him let alone pay his retirement or lifetime health Care benefits. I sometimes wonder if we are in a trap of our creation and the only escape allowed is in fact as bad as being in the trap, maybe.

  • @scottlaroche2006
    @scottlaroche2006 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I appreciate your videos, Patrick. Thank you for creating them.

  • @brianhay4024
    @brianhay4024 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mr Boyles States "gold is the world's oldest meme stock". I had not thought of it in those terms before but that statement is profound and spot on.

  • @NICO-Z-TRADER
    @NICO-Z-TRADER 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Good content as usual ! LME will go down to history as a complete failure. Another example of how the simple freaking basic trading rules that apply to all participants actually don't apply to you if you are an important player of the market and state backed. Yep, you heard it. Trades cancelled... This is really the worst LME could do. My thought to all those who made millions in being long to Nickel only to find out that all their earnings were wiped out by a simple decision from the exchange ...

  • @walkingstick6655
    @walkingstick6655 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yikes! Sure, halt trading, but how the HELL can the LME cancel a day's trades? That's insane. "In the best interests of...."

  • @bondisteve3617
    @bondisteve3617 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Many thanks Patrick.

  • @NicholasShanks
    @NicholasShanks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The deadpan humour at regarding GME at the end was great.

  • @MarkoErr
    @MarkoErr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    good story as always, LME regulation - trading without daily price notation limits ( so common in share exchanges) is quite unorthodox and could be explained in more detail.

  • @sunnymon1436
    @sunnymon1436 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "The nationality of the participant was not a relevant factor" - no, but their money, holdings and economic ties were. That's politics for ya!

  • @user-mg4yw9yc7l
    @user-mg4yw9yc7l 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It was good to hear that Goldman had an opinion. 从 m And thankyou Patrick for bringing some clarity to this muddy and ugly situation.

  • @robattenn
    @robattenn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Patrick for exposing those clowns... and the clowns that do their bidding!!

  • @Mojo-IRE
    @Mojo-IRE 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Completely unacceptable to do what the LME did. It's a line crossed as you say.

  • @johnpatrick1588
    @johnpatrick1588 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Owe the bank $1 milion it is your problem. Owe the bank a billion dollars and it is the bank's problem.

    • @stapleman007
      @stapleman007 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So banks are immune to failure?

    • @stapleman007
      @stapleman007 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Public risk, private profits.

  • @alexandroalvarez2464
    @alexandroalvarez2464 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    As usual, another brilliant delivery by Patrick Boyle . Explaining in a clear succinct manner the complexity and behaviour of the Ni market . Thank you

  • @e.3075
    @e.3075 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What an incredible mess thanks for sharing this all. Interesting story.

  • @Daniel-ny7bn
    @Daniel-ny7bn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Patrick how as a financier did you gain such deep domain expertise on the industries that you cover? By which I mean areas like the Nickel production process. My goal is to one day have the same level of robust knowledge that you do to understand global markets as a whole and not in small pieces

  • @johnhoude1340
    @johnhoude1340 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Did my Tesla just go up ten thousand dollars? 😳 Anybody want to buy a stainless steel refrigerator? This reminds me of the crash of 1987. A four dollar naked put option I wrote cost me $88.00 to cover. It had $26.00 of time value in it with one week to expiry. In a 24 hour period i lost my house, car, investment portfolio and eventually my marriage. A constant reminder that things can go wrong many magnitudes beyond the worse immaginable.

    • @moneyobsessed
      @moneyobsessed 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      any advice from your expirences?

    • @GoodMortySmith
      @GoodMortySmith 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@moneyobsessed stay on level 2 option trading and never write naked options you cannot cover. When you sell naked contracts you don’t own the underlying position and will have to spend a lot of money if things go south. Level 3 privileges let you sell naked options…. Stay on level 2. Only risk what you have.

  • @ricinphx
    @ricinphx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I finally understand what happened. Thank you very much for the thorough explanation. I will happily subscribe to your channel and can’t wait to binge watch your videos. Greetings from Phoenix, Arizona.

  • @MaxRedstone
    @MaxRedstone 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is INSANE, this is a total distortion of market efficiency and price discovery. How can a hedger or speculator trust a market that's being manipulated?

  • @Eloquence00
    @Eloquence00 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    R.i.p. LME. They fucked up hard here.

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which is the alternative thou? CME does not trade nickel and to trade on ShFE you need connections with a Chinese company

  • @HT-vd4in
    @HT-vd4in 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You cannot lose if you own the bank!

  • @naturalselfyoga1617
    @naturalselfyoga1617 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Crazy stuff. Stranger than fiction.

  • @mrfabulous123
    @mrfabulous123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wish I could just cancel the football game when I am losing on a bet.

  • @jamvan1000
    @jamvan1000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The precedent is always more important than the decision itself.

  • @TheMountainBeyondTheWoods
    @TheMountainBeyondTheWoods 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sheesh, what a shitshow this was. Who can ever trust the LME again? Great content and it was also great to watch Patrick trying harder not to laugh at this mess as the video progressed.

  • @benlamprecht6414
    @benlamprecht6414 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for your excellent analysis and presentation

  • @yoyo762
    @yoyo762 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So whats new???
    NYSE as cancelled " fat finger" trades that affected big houses but never for a small trader who was on the wrong button.
    It was too bad, so sad for him. The big house calls the exchange and claims it was a mistake. Oh, then the trade (s) were busted in exchange lingo.

  • @johnyramos8527
    @johnyramos8527 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The LME should now be treated as meme stock that it has become!

  • @titanstrading
    @titanstrading 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, incredible. Thanks for sharing!

  • @gregfam6250
    @gregfam6250 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    LME needs to be punished. Imagine building your thesis and your strategy and positions over a long time, then to have all your gains arbitrarily cancelled.

  • @Sasripper
    @Sasripper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I heard a rumor on the day there was a Chinese SOE involved, not surprised at this behavior, happens all the time on the mainland markets. The national side moves in to prop up trades. The LME shouldn't have been sold in 2012 but that was during the Chinese FDI heydays of magic money.

  • @chi-jenyang9752
    @chi-jenyang9752 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cancelling the trades is like Powerball cancelling the winning lottery ticket and refund $2 to the winner.

  • @jeffotoole4509
    @jeffotoole4509 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I can just almost see all the lawyers lining up here. I am no fan of lawyers but in this case I hope they get every penny that’s owed. Absolutely insane.

  • @AA-il9pc
    @AA-il9pc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    We about to get Econ in this bitch

  • @Theopenwindowmaniacs
    @Theopenwindowmaniacs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Typical Chinese move, when you're losing the game, just change the rules at the expense of all participants (save for yourself).

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Statistically speaking in China, investment performance is directly proportional to account size, meaning the top 10% of accounts consistently beat the market by huge margins while the bottom 10% consistently lose money. Meanwhile in the first world, not even well connected and rich and brilliant star fund managers can consistently beat the market average.
      I wonder why...

    • @tensevo
      @tensevo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not sure it is about Chinese,
      the house always wins,
      they will treat you like a child, take your pocket money, make you think you can win big,
      but it's all daylight robbery.

  • @justinmjulian
    @justinmjulian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Intense breakdown, but certainly comprehensive. Thanks for the update!
    Love the comment on gold as a meme. Seems advertisements for the yellow virtue get shoved in our face every time the S&P has a correction of any kind.

  • @RemiStardust
    @RemiStardust 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:08 Wow, nice tank :)

  • @WORLD-OF-MERLIN
    @WORLD-OF-MERLIN 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    They should not allow short selling as it is not fair to retail investors. Because short sellers get to win when they win and if they lose like this then it gets canceled so they win either way, whereas retailers if they win, well they just lost because they got canceled and if they lose then it’s fair game. It makes retailers not want to trade anymore, as it is unfair and they are at a disadvantage towards them

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol what are you talking about - what you say does not make sense
      also, retail investors should not exists...

    • @WORLD-OF-MERLIN
      @WORLD-OF-MERLIN 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chemicalfrankie1030 So when short sellers lose big in the LME case; then it simply gets reset; whereby, the retail investor doesn’t get their profit. That’s not fair. But when the retail investor loses big in betting on the price going up; then it’s too bad for the retailer, as there’s no reset for them.

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WORLD-OF-MERLIN baside the fact I do not hink retail investors are allowed in the LME, the practice of cancelling trades is wrong irrispective of the position who suffered the hit.

    • @WORLD-OF-MERLIN
      @WORLD-OF-MERLIN 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chemicalfrankie1030 in other words, that is what I was trying to say. It’s not fair to one side or the other. Makes traders lose confidence.

  • @ArnobAlam
    @ArnobAlam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Could you also cover the LME aluminum market and what happened with this market in the 2000s?

  • @81Earthangel
    @81Earthangel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A follow-up video, especially on the regulators take on this would be super interesting. Great stuff Patrick.

  • @vsync
    @vsync 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I despise your "SPACs delenda est" campaign
    but your delivery is top-notch and I about died laughing when you slipped this one in

  • @sand_ferret
    @sand_ferret 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Blood nickel...got to love it....

    • @stapleman007
      @stapleman007 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Blood nickel transfusion!

  • @Wltrwllyngaeiou
    @Wltrwllyngaeiou 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Another example of how over-globalization and over-financialization promoted volatility rather than prosperity?

    • @harrywoodman2988
      @harrywoodman2988 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      looks more like a boozy roulette table than a market

    • @negochristian1
      @negochristian1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No. You re welcomed to but locally if you don't like globalization. I'll buy where best price & quality.
      Guess what would happen if we were to compete for clients given our suppliers?

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol why?? the LME was founded in 1877!
      - allowing speculators is questionable, i admit, but favours liquidity (i.e. price discovery and fair prices fro EVERYONE)
      - your credit card contract is more 'over-financialized' than a market exchanging commodity (which even allows for physical delivery!!)
      I am not sure what you are talking about...

    • @Lawofimprobability
      @Lawofimprobability 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Global interlocking of supply chains has certainly created a lot of market correlation but I hadn't thought about how ownership of exchanges would be impacted.

  • @Gumardee_coins_and_banknotes
    @Gumardee_coins_and_banknotes 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I see in 2007 Nickel price went to $49k, nothing much happened, world still exists.

  • @hugooliveira4440
    @hugooliveira4440 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm going to use this in my favor. Next time I'll call my exchange and say: hey you, reverse my last losing trade by tomorrow alright

  • @transcrobesproject3625
    @transcrobesproject3625 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I find it infuriating how you can make these complicated financial systems seem necessary, and not just a means for skimming a larger and larger slice off the top of the productive economy! It is genuinely giving me a much richer appreciation of how the modern economy works. Thanks!

    • @Lawofimprobability
      @Lawofimprobability 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Commodities traders take on the risk of price swings. The result is that producers get a more predictable price while buyers get a more reliable price (as in the goods will actually be there). Without traders, the buyers and sellers would have to make a lot of guesses about how the supply and demand will swing.
      In the short-term, a lot of the market swings look random. In the long-term, they are predictable. You don't know if this year's olive harvest will be good or bad but you can gather data to guess and buy alternatives based on either possibility. Famously, when the price of beef rises, traders move on to buy chicken as an alternative which gives the chicken farmers a quick boost in revenue and provides a ready supply for people shifting their purchases from beef to chicken.
      Commodities traders smooth the process so you don't get the huge long-term swings of the past.

    • @hahahano2796
      @hahahano2796 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      People think they're necessary for various reasons. They ignore laws which, if utilized, limit monopolies, trusts, etc. They think people literally doing nothing except extracting wealth from the system is "helping". They overlook how speculation hurts all but those speculating. They think "the little guy" is a multinational multi billion dollar company because it's stock price is relatively low. Among other ills. They have drunk the coolaid. They cannot fathom how they are a part of a machine that takes and takes. They use edge cases and outliers of "that one time..." it might have helped someone to justify rampant economic lechery.

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hahahano2796 your 'rant' is very confused and denotes not appreciation on how the system works and the benefits it provides. It is not perfect, but it is the best way devised so far for price discovery, trade on that price, and ultimately, economic stability. Do you have a better solution?

    • @hahahano2796
      @hahahano2796 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@chemicalfrankie1030 Just call it a rant and ignore everything I said. That sure proved me wrong! Given widespread market manipulation you cannot claim it does the things you claim it does. It it doesn't do its job, and is actually a hindrance to its goals, it shouldn't exist at all. Please, take off the green colored classes.

    • @chemicalfrankie1030
      @chemicalfrankie1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hahahano2796 market manipulation is present, and there are laws to protect investors from it. Mostly applied, not always unfortunately. Again, which would be your solution? Also, what happened on the LME is not market manipulation (so I'm not really sure how it entered the conversation, and this is why I assessed what you wrote as a rant)

  • @paxdriver
    @paxdriver 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I absolutely love how all economic theory and game theory relies on the critical assumption of rational actors and limited to no intervention, because based on those simple principles we can assert as material fact that capitalism without any hint of socialism is the be all end all pinnacle of human civilization and productive enterprise. It's just so so funny were it not so utterly catastrophic lol

  • @kharyrobertson3579
    @kharyrobertson3579 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So I guess we aren't pretending that the Nickel market isn't a centrally planned market anymore.

  • @guitarbobification
    @guitarbobification 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    All serious, interesting, and educational till the very end and the AMC and gold comments. Classic humor! Great video - great finish! Love it.

  • @karimekhadiri
    @karimekhadiri 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "Gold is the oldest meme stock"
    My kids will learn this in there uni just you wait

  • @SoundsLikeOdie
    @SoundsLikeOdie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    My poor understanding of the market makes me feel like there is a oversupply of funds at the moment due to the money printing that has taken place recently. Investors are desperate to find homes for their funds.
    Ultimately that's what's causing irrational market movements. Something like this LME spike could have had massive knock on effects.
    Having worked with casinos for many years I get the same feel from the current traders as I do from the casino punters. This could end very badly for everyone.

    • @plo8monster113
      @plo8monster113 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      all on 14 red how do we short the LME surviving this