SHOULD LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS REALLY SWITCH? AUTOCAD VS REVIT

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 41

  • @geronimomanuel2542
    @geronimomanuel2542 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The terrain models you've showed in Revit are really impressive. I didn't know how much details u can put on a Revit draw. I'm trying to learn this software but it's tricky. Thanks for the video!

    • @DesignItGreen
      @DesignItGreen  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sure can! Hardly know any revit myself! but trying to get more into BIM software

    • @yotamski6707
      @yotamski6707 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Check out Environment for Revit. They have a great plug in for landscape and site design and their TH-cam channel has a bunch of tutorials :)

    • @CSDesignSoftware
      @CSDesignSoftware 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Autodesk introduced TopoSolids (3D solid representations of topographies) in Revit 2024 - providing an exciting base for landscape professionals moving forward.

  • @blueboychi
    @blueboychi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Having worked with Revit in architecture for over 20 years, I am finally excited to be working with LAs to get them on board. Revit is finally catching up and the external tools that weren't available even 2 years ago are making it truly functional for landscape architecture!

    • @DesignItGreen
      @DesignItGreen  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Slowly but surely

    • @briansmith9707
      @briansmith9707 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've been taking AutoCad in college, and it's just very frustrating, coming from manual drafting. I've started learning Revit. I wish I could talk to someone like you. Do I really need to get good at AutoCad first? Can you just begin with Revit?...

  • @amandamarin4120
    @amandamarin4120 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think you've hit the nail on the head with this video. Revit does present a lot of room to grow in the future and new opportunities. Also using it when it makes sense for the project.

    • @DesignItGreen
      @DesignItGreen  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! I think it's a great place for conversation. revit might not be the answer, but BIM software certainly is in my opinion

  • @CSDesignSoftware
    @CSDesignSoftware 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Useful video attempting to compare AutoCAD vs Revit (CAD vs BIM) based on capabilities, functionality, workflow & room to grow ☺. There is no doubt that most landscape professionals using Revit do so mainly because of the need to collaborate in the same environment as other disciplines (architectural) &/or because a particular project specifically requires it. However, looking at the wider benefits of a move from AutoCAD to Revit provides a clearer direction...
    > Accuracy (in the real world, 3D is always better than 2D)
    > Efficiency (change a 'model' component and ALL views are modified automatically)
    > New opportunities (ability to analyse model to answer bigger questions).

    • @DesignItGreen
      @DesignItGreen  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree, just need to get more people on board

  • @casperNsuzy
    @casperNsuzy ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’m a landscape architect who used AutoCAD for over 20 years before switching to BIM. Vectorworks is the answer for Landscape Architects, not Revit. Autodesk has ignored our profession for the entirety of my career, why would I use their AEC software for my LA projects when there is a better choice?

    • @DesignItGreen
      @DesignItGreen  ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha! I love the hate… I too love vectorworks but not that many people know/use it

    • @casperNsuzy
      @casperNsuzy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DesignItGreen There's no hate here. Vectorworks has been the go to Landscape Architecture software for over two decades. It's the choice of some of the world's leading landscape and architecture firms. Your narrative of people not using it is simply not true. You do harm to the LA community by spreading such misinformation.

  • @Ollicle
    @Ollicle 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Quite frankly its the cost of the software that is the prohibitive element here. We would happily take the leap into it but the cost of providing revit to the staff that would need it is just too high. Hence we have to keep bimbling along in 2d cad. Furthermore, how are you supposed to start learning it if you can't afford it!

    • @DesignItGreen
      @DesignItGreen  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I certainly don’t disagree on that and is a valid point. In general the cost of programs has gotten out of hand. Especially considering you need to have multiple programs for drafting, presentation, and visualization

  • @timdaugherty7612
    @timdaugherty7612 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm old enough (yikes!) to have been on the front line of the industry transitioning from manual drafting to CAD back in the 80's and early 90's. Unfortunately it took Landscape Architects almost a decade to catch up to their cousins in Engineering and Architecture. Professionally I think it set us back - reinforcing the stereotype of being earthy landscapers more than a technical craft.
    In terms of BIM/Revit don't you think it will ultimately come down to the same thing it always does? Time and Money. Do clients have a NEED to spend 25% more on LA fees for us to build BIM models? Do they want another month or two added to the schedule? Outside of large public work projects I don't see it yet, but accept that could change.

    • @casperNsuzy
      @casperNsuzy ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Once you convert to a BIM process, the documentation process accelerates and you end up saving time over the life of the project, just like CAD accelerated the drawing and detailing process. Like any new skill, it takes some time to learn like the transition from the boards to CAD. This one's easier though because people generally know how to use computers these days :). I use BIM for projects large and small because it's faster overall and results in a better set of construction drawings later in the process.

    • @timdaugherty7612
      @timdaugherty7612 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@casperNsuzy Good info. I guess I'm more skeptical about the cost associated with converting a team to BIM...both in training, but also software costs, etc. But I admittedly don't know as I haven't done it.

    • @casperNsuzy
      @casperNsuzy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@timdaugherty7612 I've transitioned a few teams from AutoCAD to Vectorworks and have had very good results. In the case of Vectorworks, it replaced AutoCAD and is less expensive than either AutoCAD or Revit. Plus, they have a comprehensive and free training platform that can get people up to speed at their own pace. Revit can get exceptionally expensive when you factor in having to build families from scratch or purchasing add on software to give it basic landscape functionality. Anyhow, it takes 6-9 months to transition teams in my experience, unless they already have experience with the chosen software.

    • @DesignItGreen
      @DesignItGreen  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree with all the points! Seems like a really intensive hurdle to climb but something that we need to do sooner rather than later

  • @selenaschneider123
    @selenaschneider123 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ugh I'm a 2022' architect 😢graduate and I've hated revit all those 5 years during Uni, and still do to this day, It's such an "anti-design" and so an "engineer" software I hate it so much 😭 idk why but hand sketching, post production and other combos like you do in your channel (loveee morpholio) makes everything feel more human~thought~sensible~artsy💫 I've refused for so long to include Revit in my design process but lately seems like I've got no choice but to do so. :( I'm scared it may take away what I love about my career and turn it into punishment

    • @DesignItGreen
      @DesignItGreen  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree! Really hope vectorworks takes a strong hold in landscape architecture

  • @trowawayacc
    @trowawayacc ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Revit needs to up their game. The issue is the limits of revit are bad for city size proyects.

    • @DesignItGreen
      @DesignItGreen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I definitely think revit needs to keep improving

    • @yotamski6707
      @yotamski6707 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Check out Environment for Revit. They have a great plug in for landscape and site design and their TH-cam channel has a bunch of tutorials :)

    • @CSDesignSoftware
      @CSDesignSoftware 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It would be great if Revit improved for the benefit of the landscape profession@@DesignItGreenbut clearly the main direction is towards architects. CloudScapes remains focused on delivering tools for the landscape profession (for CAD + Revit)... until such time as Autodesk changes direction ☺. Clearly the more conversation about what the landscape sector requires the better ☺

  • @Play4Vida
    @Play4Vida 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is not autocad architecture vs Revit.
    Doing a comparison with AutoCAD standard is not a good comparison.

  • @hunaheal3125
    @hunaheal3125 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi im looking into adding Samsung tablet into my work flow, but im having a difficult time finding apps that work well for landscape architecture under the android system, like morpholio trace for Ipad. Do you know of such apps like morpholio trace that works with Samsung tablet?

    • @DesignItGreen
      @DesignItGreen  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think sketchbook is the best bet I believe for samsung. I wish morpholio would go cross platform

  • @zmousez5197
    @zmousez5197 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi!
    I got an interesting question, but have nobody to ask. Do landscape architects use some regulations and normative documents in planning and landscaping ( for example, sanitary ruptures, a certain distance between playground and car parking, norms of ground embankment) in other countries (I`m not from USA) and what is it (What kind of norms and its name), if it`s not a secret.
    I`ll be glad, if you answer.

    • @DesignItGreen
      @DesignItGreen  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The short answer is yes. There are LOTS of documentation with regulations and so forth for all aspects of design

    • @zmousez5197
      @zmousez5197 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DesignItGreen what is it called, if it's not a secret?

    • @CR-rc5ch
      @CR-rc5ch 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are general standards for design that come from how materials and products perform. ASTM STANDARDS. There are also building codes for fire , safety, sanitary, stormwater, etc at federal and state levels. There are also local regulations and codes. There is also knowledge based on experience, primarily from studying how things fail. I recommend refraining your question. Looking for one specific answer to something that is immeasurably vast as a topic is self deceiving and could lead you to make some pretty costly mistakes, both financially and with human health safety and welfare. In short...there's no secret or one manual.

    • @zmousez5197
      @zmousez5197 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your answer!@@CR-rc5ch

  • @Landschaftsarchitektin
    @Landschaftsarchitektin ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You should switch to Vectorworks!

    • @DesignItGreen
      @DesignItGreen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I love using Vectorworks… but haven’t come across a single arch firm using it

    • @sarafarag4336
      @sarafarag4336 ปีที่แล้ว

      thanks for this information .i love vectorworks but the license is very expensive @@DesignItGreen

    • @jamesbettison450
      @jamesbettison450 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Am I missing something, have young Landscape Architects really been using cad and designing in 2D ??? Vectorworks has everything seen here and more!

  • @iqratech2695
    @iqratech2695 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    super no.1