The American Stealth Drone that May or May Not Exist (The RQ-180)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 474

  • @megaprojects9649
    @megaprojects9649  ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Thanks to Keeps for sponsoring this video! Head to keeps.com/MEGAPROJECTS to get a special offer.

    • @marcbeebee6969
      @marcbeebee6969 ปีที่แล้ว

      Our Favorite shiny head you tuber 😂😂😂

    • @LordMephiston40k
      @LordMephiston40k ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, yeah you can narrate....but can you whistle though?

    • @ThePixelated_kris
      @ThePixelated_kris ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ⁠@@LordMephiston40k yeah Simon if your last name really is whistler why dont you ever whistle? 🤔🤔🤔🤔

    • @j7ndominica051
      @j7ndominica051 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Keeps apparently didn't work on your. Lol.

    • @ThePixelated_kris
      @ThePixelated_kris ปีที่แล้ว

      @@j7ndominica051 he didnt have it by the time he did have it he lost his hair

  • @Olliethesnowman
    @Olliethesnowman ปีที่แล้ว +401

    My favorite shiny headed TH-camr😂😅😊🎉🎉😅

  • @flyer037
    @flyer037 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    You've forgotten a possibility of WHY they may have been spotted. Not necessarily because they want to "tease" the existence, but if they have been flying for 10+ years and they have been spotted 3 times, it is possible that these were "unscheduled" appearances. If there was an in flight emergency and the aircraft had to be diverted during a flight, it would appear in places at times it was not planned to be, and therefore seen.

  • @justinpaul3110
    @justinpaul3110 ปีที่แล้ว +187

    Ive had a very hard time believing that the USAF would've gone over 30 years without replacing the capabilities that the SR 71 was providing.

    • @julianweidner8387
      @julianweidner8387 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      What if they didn’t replace the sr-71. Could modern tech complete the mission objectives of an sr-71? Until super recent, I believe the answer is yes. I’m not committed to that opinion. It’s just a thread

    • @liddz434
      @liddz434 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well that’s why they said that U2 spy planes and satellites have been doing it.

    • @Strykenine
      @Strykenine ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Two words: Spy sattelites.

    • @justinpaul3110
      @justinpaul3110 ปีที่แล้ว

      @strykenine7902 spy satellites can be tracked and their orbits are predictable.
      This became apparent after the retirement of the Blackbird.
      Having a high flying, hypersonic spy plane can theoretically be anywhere within a matter of hours and cannot be tracked and planned on like a satellite can.

    • @texasthib2029
      @texasthib2029 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@Strykenine satellites aren’t an end all be all dude to their revolution around the earth stealth drones could have a near 100 percent up time due to air refueling

  • @ignitionfrn2223
    @ignitionfrn2223 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    3:00 - Chapter 1 - What we think we know
    7:45 - Chapter 2 - What we suspect
    11:35 - Chapter 3 - What it might be doing

  • @mtgdreamer
    @mtgdreamer ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Suggestion: Do a video on the Patriot Missle system. A video on a system able to hit a missed with another missle at supersonic speed sounds fun

    • @LRRPFco52
      @LRRPFco52 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      An actual Patriot senior leader instructor has already posted a bunch of videos on the Patriot system that far exceed anything you'll see on this channel.

    • @mtgdreamer
      @mtgdreamer ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LRRPFco52 I would like to see him do it. I was a Sargent in a Patriot battalion.

    • @dominicbeltz9057
      @dominicbeltz9057 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mtgdreamer habitual line crosser is the expert of the patriot system on this platform

    • @l.b8896
      @l.b8896 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@LRRPFco52you talkin about my boy HLC? I love Mr. LineCrosser

    • @LRRPFco52
      @LRRPFco52 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@l.b8896 👍

  • @static2430
    @static2430 ปีที่แล้ว +99

    The X-47B Drone (looks identical but slightly smaller to this RQ-180) has been around for a while now in the US Navy and has been operating off of carriers.

    • @johno1544
      @johno1544 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      They only built 2 of those for testing and they have already been mothballed. They considered sending them to a air museum

    • @ianj3735
      @ianj3735 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      They were retired in 2015 having met the objectives set for their development. The gained knowledge is notably being used with the MQ-25 program currently

    • @static2430
      @static2430 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johno1544 ah, I didn't know that. Thanks for the info.

    • @ameritoast5174
      @ameritoast5174 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@static2430 ya to my understanding those were basically test platforms and very expensive. The tech and knowledge to be used in future programs.

    • @jeremyholland4527
      @jeremyholland4527 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was used as technology demonstrator and it’s tech and what was learned was put into the ghostbat loyal wingman and stingray refueling drone.

  • @JustRootsAndLeaves
    @JustRootsAndLeaves ปีที่แล้ว +70

    I'm old enough to remember what the F-19 Stealth Fighter most definitely looked like after all the leaks by the pentagon and various credible bread-crumbs. Each bit of information confirmed the last and comprehensive picture of the F-19's shape and capability seemed to be agreed upon by all of the "experts"... until the F-117 was revealed.

    • @pkt1213
      @pkt1213 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I few so many F-19 missions.

    • @troydspain1099
      @troydspain1099 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Frisbee

    • @oxcart4172
      @oxcart4172 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      All those various "F-19s" looked so much better than the real thing!

    • @matthewsutton5946
      @matthewsutton5946 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Lol the F-19 design was intentionally made to be as far from the actual stealth as possible to confuse potential adversary nations. I remember it too. I built a model of it once along with another model that was supposed to be a Russian Stealth

  • @joesikkens158
    @joesikkens158 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I’ve been seeing either the RQ170 or RQ180 here in the Antelope Valley, CA: love right next to Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Skunkworks. Never knew the name till now. Looks amazing flying!

    • @jtek2259
      @jtek2259 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Try to take pictures if you can! It would be amazing to see more pictures of these bad boys, though I know that threatens your own safety

    • @bee5440
      @bee5440 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's the RQ-170! I've seen it too, Lockheed takes it out to fly every once and a while out of the regional airport. Definitely not the RQ-180

  • @cluisdotorg
    @cluisdotorg ปีที่แล้ว +27

    You are in fact my favorite shiny headed youtuber Simon. Thanks for that. :)

    • @MJ-zo5gb
      @MJ-zo5gb ปีที่แล้ว

      Mine is Scott Manly! 🤣

  • @Jayjay-qe6um
    @Jayjay-qe6um ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Once its existence is confirmed, I can't wait to see the RQ-180 in action, in Ace Combat 8.

    • @MrDalisclock
      @MrDalisclock ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Didn't ace combat 7 already do the drone thing pretty heavily?

  • @mutantryeff
    @mutantryeff ปีที่แล้ว +11

    One of the U-2 landing flight paths into Beale AFB is just slightly to the east of my house. I'd guess that it is no higher than 10K feet when heading north to Beale.

  • @batboy-xf3ki
    @batboy-xf3ki ปีที่แล้ว +1

    :::USAF::: "Awe, Simon! You love us!!!You really love us!"
    Jim Carry reference.

  • @royduenas1192
    @royduenas1192 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Awesome video, as always! I'm from Guam and know that there's a lot of strategic operations carried out from Anderson Air Force Base. The intelligence stated in this video coincides with how little information is known about the military reaction to China's presence in the waters near Guam. Our country may be guilty of a lot of things that are frowned upon, however, many don't understand the necessary steps that are needed to ensure our freedom and to sustain our way of life.

    • @Yuki_Ika7
      @Yuki_Ika7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly!

    • @Justin_Ebright
      @Justin_Ebright ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's why we avoid signing deals that ban weapons and such. It's not that we don't support the spirit or won't avoid using said weapons, it's just so we don't handcuff ourselves if an enemy nation does. If they aren't worried about a like-kind attack they'd be less likely to hesitate using them themselves.

  • @jameswhitehead6758
    @jameswhitehead6758 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the intro and the self-deprecating humor Simon.

  • @Ji66a
    @Ji66a หลายเดือนก่อน

    No doubt in my mind that Simon thought the teleprompter was wrong so he tried to compensate by calling it “Ace Adventure” movies! My favorite part is how sure of himself he was! 😂😂

  • @mattywanders
    @mattywanders ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Could you do an episode on the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel in Virginia? It's got to be the most terrifying bridge in the United States!

    • @patrickkelly8095
      @patrickkelly8095 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I love that bridge.

    • @mattywanders
      @mattywanders ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@patrickkelly8095 Wouldn't it make for a great episode?!

    • @CrisMind
      @CrisMind ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is it terrifying? I always love driving it

    • @justinpaul3110
      @justinpaul3110 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Are you kidding? That is the coolest bridge in the USA!
      The toll sucks though.

    • @patrickkelly8095
      @patrickkelly8095 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mattywanders it would.

  • @erasmus_locke
    @erasmus_locke ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'd love a video on that stolen RQ-170 in Iran

  • @nicklindberg90
    @nicklindberg90 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Best sponsorship on TH-cam

  • @e.s.5529
    @e.s.5529 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    if the platform is operating in broad daylight over the United States and Guam and can be filmed and photographed easily ...then there are probably two to three other platforms that are radically more advanced and secretive, that's a guarantee. There are more than likely 4th and 5th generations of the TR-3b ISR airframe attached to the N.R.O.

    • @SPCv4
      @SPCv4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Evidence?

    • @goldenhate6649
      @goldenhate6649 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Not necessarily. SR-71 flew over the US, so did the B2, so did the F-22. Just because it can be seen visually doesn't mean its not "the most" advanced. The things still have to fly long distance during testing and missions.

    • @Yuki_Ika7
      @Yuki_Ika7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yup, or at least in development

    • @Istandby666
      @Istandby666 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If it's flying, then it's old technology.

    • @Istandby666
      @Istandby666 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@goldenhate6649
      The B-2 is a 1982 design.
      The F-22, is a 1988 design.
      My biological father worked on these program's.

  • @Istandby666
    @Istandby666 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for bring up the B-21 and the RQ-170 and going in to public domain information to clarify your information.

  • @Heretic44
    @Heretic44 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the videos but the adverts are funny!! Keeps… yeah hows that getting on for you bulbshine? 😂 why would i buy it when it clearly isnt working your scalp hahahhahah

  • @nathancroke9602
    @nathancroke9602 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nothing to do with the actual video content, but as a fellow shiny head, I've recently learnt that beards are harder work than a full head of hair!

  • @SeauxNOLALady
    @SeauxNOLALady 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What has always blown my mind is that the aircraft that enter service publicly have been in development for decades at least… For instance, the F-22 Raptor was initially conceived back in the late twentieth century, like before cell phones, high speed internet and wireless networks were even a thing! Yet it’s the most advanced and powerful air platform ever built for air dominance!

  • @BaronVonQuiply
    @BaronVonQuiply ปีที่แล้ว +1

    03:36 _"Don't just take this video with a grain of salt, crack open the whole salt shaker"_
    Sir, as a man of class, I'll have you know I get my sodium chloride directly from the salt lick.

  • @zanemccune8759
    @zanemccune8759 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've seen... something like this flying over Colorado, I live near Buckley Space Force Base. It was so high it basically blended into the sky, my eyes could tell the shape far better than my camera.

  • @Amen6magi
    @Amen6magi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    RQ180 :god pls not anerica
    RQ180 birth:doctor where am i
    Doctor:your in iran😂

  • @EmillioMelendez
    @EmillioMelendez ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Your everyone’s favorite shiny headed TH-camr!

  • @JohnJohnson-dj2dv
    @JohnJohnson-dj2dv ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice that you used an old project jet for the slide photo that I worked with years ago...that would be the Northrop-Grumman X-47B. Awesome demonstration project and the awards we got were well deserved - IMHO!

  • @10p6
    @10p6 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Flying wings 'DO NOT REDUCE DRAG', they leverage lift in and reduce weight in a slimmer unibody.

  • @jrtstrategicapital560
    @jrtstrategicapital560 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can't wait for your review on Lockheeds alien reproduction vehicles...👌

  • @paulkeenan2691
    @paulkeenan2691 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    With the expansion of the Aurura Project- perhaps TRB3 or the more latest edition TRB 10+ could make a mention.

    • @dolphin265
      @dolphin265 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cancermcaids7688 well, rotodet engines are real even if the "aurora" isnt

    • @paulkeenan2691
      @paulkeenan2691 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cancermcaids7688 yeah and John Lear and Bob Lazar were the agents of reverse thinking

  • @thudthud5423
    @thudthud5423 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Is it called the RQ-180? Good question. The original stealth fighter was long rumored to be designated the "F-19" and it turned out to be the F-117.

    • @justinzak5025
      @justinzak5025 ปีที่แล้ว

      And wasn’t a fighter

    • @Xenomorphine
      @Xenomorphine ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rumours persist that the F-19 (whether purely in design or also in designation) existed and was separate to the F-117.
      There was also ASTRA and a number of others out there.

    • @thudthud5423
      @thudthud5423 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@justinzak5025 True. It should have been designated "A-11", "A12" or "A-13" (I'm not sure where it would have fit in.
      It was given an "F" designation, probably for misleading purposes, I'm thinking. But, why was it "117"?
      I think there is an actual explanation, but I've held two personal theories (one is probably the answer):
      1. For misleading purposes, it was given an engine designation. So, it would have a paper trail for accounting purposes, but those not in the know would think that funding was funneled into its program for engine development and not for an entire aircraft program.
      2. Its in the "Century Series" of US military aircraft that included the F-100 Super Sabre and the F-111 Aardvark. As I recall, there are "F-112, F-113, F-114, F-115 and F-116" aircraft designations given to "borrowed" Soviet fighters in the US inventory whose squadrons are flown out of Groom Lake. It makes an awful lot of sense that the Stealth "Fighter's" designation would follow in the same series as its an "Area 51 Child" as well.

    • @georgewright3949
      @georgewright3949 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thudthud5423 well the F117 had a role not dissimilar to the F105 and F111 both were light bombers

  • @nephalos666
    @nephalos666 ปีที่แล้ว

    WE LOVE YOU, SHINY HEAD MAN WHO ENTERTAINS US WITH HIS 20-SOME CHANNELS!!!!

  • @danielwhite8838
    @danielwhite8838 ปีที่แล้ว

    Uh. 12:45. Satellites have been giving real time high resolution imagery and data for decades. And the U2 platform/program is roughly 70 years old.

  • @jamesrochon2195
    @jamesrochon2195 ปีที่แล้ว

    Almost a Million!!🎉

  • @Fubblin
    @Fubblin ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The F-35 has filled some of the persistent ISR requirements by its mere presence in a battlespace due to its network system integration capabilities of enhancing awareness.

    • @patrickkelly8095
      @patrickkelly8095 ปีที่แล้ว

      Until the Chinese hack the system and down all of the planes.

    • @Yuki_Ika7
      @Yuki_Ika7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      True, but the RQ-180 might be able to go even higher and into more dangerous territory all while risking no Americans in the process (unless you count thier jobs if they crash the thing or leak it's specs or something other of the sort)

  • @tonymobbs7738
    @tonymobbs7738 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    there is also plant 42 that has a strong history with spycraft (and skunkworks). keep an eye on google maps occationally they will update and a spy craft of some sort will be out in the open

    • @sojolly
      @sojolly ปีที่แล้ว

      i heard many weird sounds in the night when i lived in east Palmdale.....

    • @SeauxNOLALady
      @SeauxNOLALady 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Plant 42? Do tell…

  • @cr0ss0ut
    @cr0ss0ut ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Interesting! I was on a flight from Sacramento to San Diego looking out of the window at the ground below. Then I saw a really fast moving aircraft shaped EXACTLY like the rendering at 16:00 it was black on top and absolutely hauling ass flying eastward about 1000 - 2000 feet below us before passing under the plane i was in. i thought i had a pretty clear view of it. unfortunately i was too quick for me to whip out my phone for a picture tho i did try.

    • @spencerstevens2175
      @spencerstevens2175 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm sure they flew this highly secret plane in the direct path of your known flight path

  • @TomThibodeau-z8z
    @TomThibodeau-z8z ปีที่แล้ว

    You think about doing a megaproject video on the USS Monitor/ CSS Virginia

  • @SuperpowerBroadcasting
    @SuperpowerBroadcasting ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Such an awesome aircraft!

  • @brianv1988
    @brianv1988 ปีที่แล้ว

    So it's kind of like the RQ ghost bat but that's a unmanned wingman the Australia is making ?...I really like the rq 170. Didn't even know there was another one then you have the global hawk and the mq4c- Triton was the replacement for the global hawk I could be wrong though

  • @gapprs84
    @gapprs84 ปีที่แล้ว

    @13:39 Those are not Global Hawks, they are USN MQ-4C Tritons.

  • @emjackson2289
    @emjackson2289 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Just remember the D21 . . . . launched from the back of the A12, so dodgy to launch that they launched them from the B52 but then they realised the SR71 was simply better than the D21.

    • @angelosasso1653
      @angelosasso1653 ปีที่แล้ว

      The D-21 has a special place in my heart. It was also ahead of its time. Sadly didn't have the success its mother had...

  • @angelosasso1653
    @angelosasso1653 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    If it should fly faster, wouldn't it be better to have a more arrow like wing? I would think, the design resembling the B-2/B-21, endurance and maybe height is the name of the game.

    • @paulmurgatroyd6372
      @paulmurgatroyd6372 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      With the thin air up at 80-100k/feet, it might be more useful to have the longer wings for stability. It probably isn't going as fast as an SR-71.

    • @angelosasso1653
      @angelosasso1653 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@paulmurgatroyd6372 Exactly, longer wings for higher endurance and greater altitude but for speed, this alignment is not optimal, I would guess it is flying subsonic. As pointed out in the video: It is most likely a replacement for the U-2 with added stealth and unmanned.

    • @joedufour8188
      @joedufour8188 ปีที่แล้ว

      TH-cam experts.... people who can't do simple long division but think they figured out what literal geniuses and experts didn't.

    • @paulmurgatroyd6372
      @paulmurgatroyd6372 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joedufour8188 Miserable bastards... people who just make comments to moan at everyone because why not.

  • @coadypurchase923
    @coadypurchase923 ปีที่แล้ว

    The usaf has a rich history of admitting to to its assets once they’ve become obsolete. I love the anxt they create by toying with us

  • @MarcinKryszak
    @MarcinKryszak ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice sweater Simon

  • @dominicmillns5856
    @dominicmillns5856 ปีที่แล้ว

    You’re favourite shiny headed youtuber here!
    - Babish has entered the ch
    - Vsauce has entered the ch
    - FACT BOI HAS ENDED THE CHAT.

  • @raymidway624
    @raymidway624 ปีที่แล้ว

    Their base might be where the RQ-170 operates as well. The area around the base is called Area 52. Same location where the F117 were stationed

  • @OdyTypeR
    @OdyTypeR ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I worked on F-16's back in the day, which had it's challenges, but I would hate to be a maintainer on one of these - having to take a knee and bow your head all the time...

  • @benkenobi7800
    @benkenobi7800 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do the Lockheed Martín Cornorant next please!!!

  • @pipinghotpizzarolls
    @pipinghotpizzarolls ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks chrome dome 💚

  • @dunatyphon5416
    @dunatyphon5416 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    HA! The RQ-170 wasn't "TAKEN OVER"..... it was hand delivered! 🤣🤣🤣

  • @SilvanaDil
    @SilvanaDil ปีที่แล้ว +7

    China: "We shot down a satellite in the past two years. It was sloppy, but we did it."
    USA: "We're not impressed given that we shot down a satellite -- cleanly -- over 15 years ago."

    • @dianapennepacker6854
      @dianapennepacker6854 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Try nearly 40 years ago! A F-15 shot one in the mid 80s.
      It wouldn't surprise me if we had ways to destroy a satellite without causing a debris field in space.
      Pretty interesting stuff honestly.

  • @pat8988
    @pat8988 ปีที่แล้ว

    “Conduct electronic warfare attacks”. (10:10). That would be one sure fire way to destroy your stealth.

  • @davepitts4479
    @davepitts4479 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Flash thingy time!

  • @_KaiTheGamer_
    @_KaiTheGamer_ ปีที่แล้ว

    Omg he really is my favorite shiny-headed youtuber

  • @HemiDude100
    @HemiDude100 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Ucav? *bf4 flashbacks intensify*

  • @jcdefrancis
    @jcdefrancis ปีที่แล้ว

    More like 2nd favorite. Babish #1!

  • @TheAslakVind
    @TheAslakVind 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just noticed a very public SOME post by the Air Force, retiring one of its U-2 Dragon Lady rec planes. I was curious, why that was made. Maybe it is not chained up to this new drone. Maybe the airframe just had it. But still..

    • @CVSoprano
      @CVSoprano 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Airframes are good until 2050. Shiny new toys motivation.

  • @MrAbraxus666
    @MrAbraxus666 ปีที่แล้ว

    *does the DiCaprio pointing meme* That's the Batwing Folks...That's the Batwing.

  • @Cheiff117
    @Cheiff117 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shiny head , dashing beard

  • @Arenesz
    @Arenesz ปีที่แล้ว

    IT DID FLY NOT LONG AGO!! YAY!!

  • @zmblion
    @zmblion ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I swear ive seen this a few yrs ago but idk i could be wrong but it was pretty similar. The air force does have a base not far away so idk.

  • @JIJO333
    @JIJO333 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved the AD, a bald dude talking about & advertising hair lose preventing shampoo. The proof? look at his head!

  • @Joker210SA
    @Joker210SA ปีที่แล้ว

    Lost my shxt over the white bat part lol 🤣 😂

  • @brendakrieger7000
    @brendakrieger7000 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!

  • @m1t2a1
    @m1t2a1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jack Northrop would love this.

  • @lilpaper3718
    @lilpaper3718 ปีที่แล้ว

    question what do you use to clean your beard

  • @happygolucky143
    @happygolucky143 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:47 i think i heard EQ Hawkeye 🤔

  • @craigme3014
    @craigme3014 ปีที่แล้ว

    stuff the head hair treatment! go for the beard! disclaimer i do not have one. nice jumper change!

  • @finscreenname
    @finscreenname ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seems like stealth could be overcome by having a satellite overhead and radar on the ground. These planes reflect radar away from the broadcaster's receivers but those waves have to go somewhere and the satellite could pick up the big hole in the sky. Also these planes may have a radar signature the size of a bird but what bird flies at 40,000 doing a couple hundred mph?

    • @apolloaero
      @apolloaero ปีที่แล้ว

      That's not how radar works. When giving RCS values equivalent to birds or insects, it's just to give you an idea on how small the RCS is. It doesn't mean you can see everything or that you're tracking millions of insects in hopes of catching one going 500 mph

    • @TheRealWilliamWhite
      @TheRealWilliamWhite ปีที่แล้ว

      Even then it's more likely that the radar malfunctioned then that there is something there

    • @TheNanotag
      @TheNanotag ปีที่แล้ว +1

      RCS isn't a single number; it varies based on multiple factors - frequency, angle relative to radar, and polarization.

  • @carlstanland5333
    @carlstanland5333 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Shikaka! 🛖🦇

  • @cheyennekline9674
    @cheyennekline9674 ปีที่แล้ว

    Definitely exists, I saw it flying over the Rocky Mountains when I was about 13. The military was doing some sketch shit in Colorado.

  • @logicalsnuffleupagus1822
    @logicalsnuffleupagus1822 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hey Simon, it would be really cool if you narrated a full-length Attenborugh style nature documentary. If my wife's huge knockers could speak they'd have your voice. I've been watching you since ancient times. Always believed you'd make a great nature documentary. Respectfully requested. 🙏

  • @ZayahFeaster
    @ZayahFeaster ปีที่แล้ว

    Simon, please do a crossover with Babish Cooking University 😭😭😭

  • @tedsmith6137
    @tedsmith6137 ปีที่แล้ว

    "....a clearly defined pointed tail....."? 4:50. So why is that not drawn on the sketches?

  • @Raffael66
    @Raffael66 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Aurora aircraft, tr3b black manta plane, RQ-180 plane, the US are the masters of classified aircraft Legends

  • @gwizdolby
    @gwizdolby ปีที่แล้ว

    True story. I along with most of our Hockey team shaved our heads in solidarity when a team mate of ours who was diagnosed with leukemia. Long story short. I liked the look and I kept bicing my head in the shower every other day for 5+ years. I went bald without ever knowing about it. You might think this is BS but for what ever the word from a random commenter on TH-cam is worth.

  • @Overneed-Belkan-Witch
    @Overneed-Belkan-Witch ปีที่แล้ว

    Remember, stick with Trigger. And you'll make it.

  • @BV-fr8bf
    @BV-fr8bf ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wing span of 170 feet? That almost as large as a B-52!

  • @Emma15969
    @Emma15969 ปีที่แล้ว

    That nice smooth bald head, dont be ashamed it's amazing.

  • @liamegan6721
    @liamegan6721 ปีที่แล้ว

    the us military has been in goblin mode since 1941

  • @AllDay3090
    @AllDay3090 ปีที่แล้ว

    *FUN FACT*
    Every U.S./Japanese ship equipped with the AEGIS system is able to shoot down Chinese satellites. They've had that capability for 10+ years now.

  • @hnd450
    @hnd450 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chicagoooooooooo!

  • @chat-1978
    @chat-1978 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn't it warm there😅😅
    Air-conditioning set to mega project temperatures?

  • @stankythecat6735
    @stankythecat6735 ปีที่แล้ว

    I swear to god , I saw one of theses over Palm Springs at night. It’s crazy looking

  • @eprohoda
    @eprohoda ปีที่แล้ว

    How are things?!Omg~ so epic drone. catch ya later! 💪

  • @femain1788
    @femain1788 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep making videos about fighter and stealth jets and they might just try to sell you one. 😂

  • @reggiep75
    @reggiep75 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shine me with the facts, Fact-Boi!!

  • @RonnieRawdawg
    @RonnieRawdawg ปีที่แล้ว

    I've seen one of these before there's one at my local airbase

  • @Insectoid_
    @Insectoid_ ปีที่แล้ว

    There are far more aircraft although many are test craft. Michael Schratt does some great presentations

  • @Alpha_Joe
    @Alpha_Joe ปีที่แล้ว

    it's reminded me of the mq101
    "where's the arsenal bird"

  • @AllDay3090
    @AllDay3090 ปีที่แล้ว

    *I THINK KEEPS WAS TROLLING WHEN THEY ASKED YOU TO BE A SPONSOR* 😂

  • @JokubasVas
    @JokubasVas ปีที่แล้ว

    7:10 that should be 22850 km instead of 28850 km

  • @Pavel_Poluian
    @Pavel_Poluian ปีที่แล้ว

    The first approach to this secret technology appeared 100 years ago! Pitts Sky Car - the device is an ancestor of contemporary flying saucers. This umbrella plane looks funny, but it is unlikely that the American inventor spent money on making the machine just for fun. The flight principle based on generating compression under a vibrating plane is no worse than the flight principle of traditional airplanes. When the device was being created, engineers realized that it would give a higher lifting force. Step by step it turned out during the tests that the device could perform a flight if the oscillation frequency was measured in megahertz and the amplitude of oscillation in millimeters. But at that time there were no technologies to get the total power of vibration and achieve supersonic frequency. The aircraft-?building company of Chance Vought cooperated with the Naval Department. The Skimmer flying saucer that appeared after WWII was a result of the cooperation. It is believed to be an experimental variant of a propeller-?driven airplane, however it is not ruled out that Chance Vought made the model especially for running tests of the aerodynamic lift of electrokinetic engines. In the late 1940s, first flying saucers appeared in the US. They resembled telephone loudspeakers: impulse electromagnets made one or several huge membranes beat the air at a megahertz frequency. And a streamline top part of the device provided the difference of drag forces on the top and on the bottom. But still some facts pertaining to the strange device remained unclear. A flying saucer could not generate any lifting force until it threw something off the way rockets did. This is a ring whirl: it does not leave vacuum to intake a flying saucer. It is necessary to keep a saucer on the ring whirl just for a couple of microseconds, the period within which a new whirl is generated. Flying saucers with impulse electromagnets were heavy and could not cover long distances. So, Americans had to use submarines to deliver them to the Soviet shores that gave rise to stories telling that UFOs emerged from under water. Later, new devices appeared where no electromagnetic field was used to shake a propelling membrane. The bodies of such devices were made of piezoceramic, and vibration appeared thanks to the piezoelectric effect (we know that piezoelectric tweeters make the sound in electronic alarm clocks and mobile phones). The new generation apparatuses were no longer saucers but spheres, ellipsoids and other three-?dimensional figures haloed with ionized gas. The USSR got UFOs of its own in the 1960s-70s. Once, Soviet Academician Shklovsky asserted in the popular informational program Vremya (Time) that there were no other creatures besides earth dwellers in the Universe. It sounded like an official statement of the Central Committee of the Soviet Communist Party saying that no aliens ever existed, and all reports alleging that people witnessed UFOs were misinformation. Special committees immediately started censoring newspaper publications and deleted everything that could be connected with UFO visits and aliens. At that very period Americans already had the third generation of flying saucers, dark objects with just few zones on them glowing. Those were whirl activators: the glow on the bottom to make the object fly and the glow on the side (so-?called illuminators) to make it move to the sides. Now used motor panel. They are arranged as a plasma TV screen. But the cell arresters is the tube of the rail launcher in cities. Plasma sparks popping up with great speed thousands of times per second - this creates a toroidal flux rings, which propel the apparatus.

  • @toddburgess5056
    @toddburgess5056 ปีที่แล้ว

    On a side note, I have a 17 foot aluminum canoe manufactured by Grumman

  • @donaldf.switlick3690
    @donaldf.switlick3690 ปีที่แล้ว

    MHD Demonstrations Of Nonconventional Flight
    th-cam.com/video/_nrS3XWR2bw/w-d-xo.html

  • @gunnerroo6514
    @gunnerroo6514 ปีที่แล้ว

    Friendly Advanced UAV entering the AO.

  • @MTBScotland
    @MTBScotland ปีที่แล้ว

    hope it is harder to electronically interfere with than the RQ-170 😂