Modern Warfare 3 vs Call of Duty Cold War: Attention-to-Detail Comparison
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ธ.ค. 2023
- Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 vs Call of Duty Cold War: Attention-to-Detail Comparison
#modernwarfare3 #callofduty #modernwarfare2 #callofdutygameplay
Thanks for watching.
PC Specification:
CPU: i5 13700K
GPU : Rtx 4080
RAM : 32 GB Corsair vengeance
Motherboard: MSI
HDD: 2 TB
SSD: NVME 2 TB
PSU: EVGA 1000
CPU Cooler: Deepcool AIO
Case: NZXT
Monitor: Samsung Neo G8
Keyboard: Corsair K70 Rapidfire
Mouse: Logitech G502 - เกม
![แข่งแลกของ 1 วัน!! ของใครแพงสุดชนะ!! [Ver.2024]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/joRT59ilPHg/mqdefault.jpg)
damn crazy how they have the time and budget to add breakable icicles but not enough time to make a longer campaign
But still it's great I like the campaign even if it's short it's like they finally do the quality over quantity.
@@MCDEMON-OG have you tried dmz?
@@MCDEMON-OGlil bro forgot about open combat missions
@@MCDEMON-OGLol did you just say MW3 campaign is quality over quantity? It’s god awful… every single game before MW2023 had high quality campaigns and lots of missions except for vanguard
Cold War’s story was great especially bc they had to do it from home bc of Covid 19
Treyarch is very proud of their engine. It may not look as visually impressive, but they made sure it was as optimized as possible.
cap cold war had shitty preformance compared to mw2019
@@jenzu4229didnt they both run on the same engine
@@Dwexy no
nahhh, cold war is on treyarch engine. mw2019 on IW9 engine@@Dwexy
@@Dwexy No, MW2019 runs on IW8, Cold War runs on a variant of Treyarch's T7. While both are variants of quake, they're both wildly different branches of their lineage.
“Great job team! We spent all our time and efforts on making our game look beautiful! Now how do we actually plan to make the game good?”
It’s honestly one of the best cods we’ve gotten recently in terms of multiplayer, with advanced movement, old maps, fixed recoil, and better balancing. It’s just the campaign that brings it down
@@jeotyx you say that like topping vanguard and mw2 mp is a hard thing to do.
@@DEORAx. I mean yeah but like ngl mw3 (the new one) tops a few old cods, but due to the people who will commit arson when someone says their favorite, obscure, filler cod game was okay at best I’m gonna keep those to myself
@@jeotyxcompared to cold war mw3 loses meaning the only way mw3 wins is against two trash games.
@@Slimeminemshady fair
Actually, the aiming system of Cold War is more accurate, because of the fact that with both eyes opened (not with the snipers though) you can aim in a better way, calculating the depth of your target. You can look it up, I do apologise if I didn’t make myself clear with this explanation
that is stated in the video yes
Something they don’t mention is that it helps maintain situational awareness.
Now I can apologize my bad aim in warzone. Thank you 😊
The character look to other side and still can shot straight WOW That's so realistic
Good job stating exactly what the video already said smh
1:39 Cold War does have this detail. You've pointed this out in an old video
Either it was removed or they turned down some graphical settings
Its there not as bright but he have woods in the shadow of course bo light going shine but the detail is there
It's called subsurface scattering and it's a feature in most modern game engines as well as pretty much all 3d renderers
The smoke casting shadows detail is very inconsistent in MW3
Sling in cold war is period accurate. Front of body weapon retention wasn't really a thing until maybe the 90s.
It did in ww2
Which means that MW3 is accurate for its time taking place in current day
MWIII realismo, detalles, "tactico", Cold war Diversion pura, arcade, Nostalgia
3:20 bro is balling
Cold War lighting was so much better than mw3 lighting
Colors too
Cold war is over saturated, mw goes for a more realistic lighting approach
@@stcknoobs5516 I’m not talking about 2019, cuz 2019 was the goat. The newer ones have trash ass lighting
3arc usually is known for their vibrant colors while IW is dull.
@@delightfulvibes8372 3arc goes for the color asthetic because of the time period. Black Ops 1 and Cold War are at times dirty smokey and very colorful, while Black ops 2, 3 and 4 are cleaner and more colorful because of the futuristic setting. The only 2 3arc games that are hardly colorful at all, are Call of Duty 3 and World at War, because they are set in War torn locations in WW2. Even Black Ops Declassified had some decent color to it
All the attention to detail in MW only for Cold War to still have overall better gameplay.
I forgot how good Cold War looked. Sad, that the next Black Ops game is in the MW Engine and not their own
The good thing is that it will be a game with almost 4 years of development, so I trust Treyarch that they can do it equally or better than what IW did with MW2019, because to be honest not even MW2 and 3 are even equal to MW2019 , this one is much superior.
@@Astarmajo Absolutely. Treyarch is great
it better not have MW reload animations😭
Part of me is really excited for Treyarch to have a shot with the new engine, but yeah I will miss this style. Cold War I think is a great send off to the old engine we've known and loved for many years.
@@winlover37a terrifying thought though is how much learning the new engine may have slowed development down
I feel like the fact where cold war models keep both eyes open, not sure if it's a detail they intentionally put in or unintentional as avatar model animations looked lazy (Portnova literally looked to the side and fired a shot then turned back like nothing happened)
At least cold war doesn't packet burst every 10 seconds
Both eyes open is what you are supposed to use with most weapons and optics
This was stated in the video already
Although aiming with both eyes is accurate… as a gameplay detail it makes Treyarch look “bad” because it’s 1 less animation.
They should have done a “focused” face expression instead of keep looking like a liveless doll
I love how Cold War ended up with minimal distraction to player
my favorite part is how you only notice any of this while making this style of video
MWIII: Doesn't have what CW does.
CW: Doesn't have what MWIII does.
What sense does that make?...
@@imalive365 MW3 has some realistic elements that CW doesn't have
CW has some realistic elements that MW3 doesn't have
quite simple
@@imalive365they are different teams using different engines who focused on different aspects of realism while working on their projects.
That being said MW3 is just MW2’s design decisions again as it was just dlc originally
Hey I think there’s this really cool detail you could show in your next video. When playing I accidentally stumbled upon this detail when random just hitting objects around a map in MW3, and at some point I hit a coffee machine and instead of just breaking, it actually started pouring out coffee from the dispenser. It’s a really cool thing and shows some real attention to detail
Sure... I will include it in next video
@@Stay_FrostyI found where to find he coffee machine and which map it is on. It is in high rise, in the kitchen in the building that you can go on top of (ACTIBASE Building) The room has 2 blue soda machines, and is on the East side of the building, at the front sort of near the helicopter. It also has some coffee beans packets that when you shoot, leave a pile of coffee beans on the table, which I thought was also pretty cool
@@DanstarProject thanks I was searching for it
this is a cool find!
most of the time when your in fight or flight mode, which is basically most the time in cold war, soldiers usually have both of their eyes open while aiming.
I love how everyone suddenly likes cold war now but when it was new people were shitting on it
Cod cycle.
Or the pandemic fucked up the game's development
Thats how cod works
isnt MW3 just MW2019 but with a diffrent color filter? and maybe upgraded HD 4K texture?
No, it's MWII with no differences
@@Izookyon spot
@Izooky yeah no differences because we havent progressed things way farther for them to make a new engine and that means you get to keep your stupid nicki minaj skin
@@ECHO-87 I'm a free-to-play player, never spent a dime :D
@@Izooky no it’s more like mw2 2009 with mw19 movement and Cold War 150 health lol
A few things I’d like to mention first off when on terminal you’re walking around and walking over Peper but when you’re walking over Peper IRL do you hear Peper? Also, when you’re shooting at the ground to make bullet holes bullets typically don’t make craters just watch any gun channel. You kind of see how they work. And then when you’re doing penetration test or hotspots as you called them, I don’t think I’ve ever seen bullets leave hotspots when shooting metal walls IRL they typically just leave a dent in the casing stay in the wall unless it goes straight through it and when you were floating objects, bullets don’t float, they sink that’s gonna say about that and then when you’re testing footprints in the ground, you are very favorable towards modern warfare three by choosing a rainy map with mud and water, but then going to the driest and least wet parts of call duty Cold War, not to mention do you leave footprints in the dirt when you walk around IRL and how noticeable are they huh? And this whole time when you’re shooting tires and glass you’re using high-powered guns on modern warfare three and then using guns that have less power like the M1 11 and the AK where is in Cold War there are guns that are powerful like in my warfare three but you chose not to use those because it would make modern warfare three look bad and I’m just saying my number three was made in a rush so missing a few details. Doesn’t seem that bad when it’s a game about shooting each other and teaching kids violence is always the answer
Calm down dude it's an arcade shooter made by treyarch and sledge hammer
@@emitruoyetsawinehwem4681 I was perfectly calm when I made this comment it’s just if you’re going to insult the community by looking at details in a game you got to expect backlash
Bruh
@@elduck3281 use some big boy words to convey your issue yes or are you unable 🤤?
@@jayrock825mc7Bruh. For you - unable.
Whoa c est juste incroyable sachant qu en 2011 bf3 sur 2 générations précédentes de consoles avait des destruction beaucoup plus avancées limite total de la map , bienvenue dans le futur activision .
It’s crazy how an IW 9 game can be worse than a game running on a custom IW 3 engine!
Its not the engine thats the problem. Its everything else.
mw3 took 16 months of development which is activision's fault . this yrs game was not meant to be MW3 Shg was developing aw2 (advance warfare 2 ) for 3 yrs. and aw2 was about to be this years game but activision declined and and they are forced to develop MW3 with just 16 months. if the devs had time for MW3 the game was about to be a banger for this yr
Definitely bro, a longer campaign with ACTUAL missions would make this one a great game. If only they developed this game for 30-36 months.
Cold War had an equal if not shorter amount of time and still made a banger.
@@delightfulvibes8372 mp = mw3 2023 >>>>>>> cw
campaign = cw>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mw3 2023
@@delightfulvibes8372CW didn't have much content when it was released , bit at the end of game's cycle it had lot. Plus there was also the pandemic too lol
Seeing footprints in cold war was literally a perk
I don't care if the game looks realistic. As long as I can actually play with a stable frame rate and actually enjoy the game, then I'll play it. I'm not paying $80 for realism 😭😭
I mean no surprise here, Treyarch has always gone for a more arcade-y approach with their games while IW sticks with realism the best they can
6:01 what M4 variant is that?
It’s the riveter shotgun
Its a shotty man
cold war is an underrated one
Why do people keep comparing the small details and making decisions on which game is better (not saying this video does it, but it happens ALOT)
the small details are literally the least important in a game.
Lets remember in mw2 and 3 water and swimming features have been made by treyarch.
people hate on these games but I absolutely adore how good it looks and the art direction, the people who make these maps and these models are so talented
Very interesting video, thank you for your service.
Damm guess all the attention went to "Physics" detail instead of "Story detail"
They had 6 months to create the mission, model items, create triggers in the map, make animations/cinematics,and voicelines wtf do you expect?
@@ECHO-87activision is a shit company so they forced them to do it under 1 year and orders
so happy that microsoft bought the company so we’ll be getting a better cod
and they spent all that time into making details no one is ever going to care about@@ECHO-87
@@mrjayden17I wouldn't out my hopes on Microsoft. Remember what happened with Halo?
@@ECHO-87Also dude acting like anyone pays the 70 dollars for the campagn, it was mid yes and rushed but Multiplayer is what most people buy cod for.
You gotta think treyarch only had a year to put this together with Covid. Y’all gotta give it a solid rating given it’s being put up against a game that has a 3 year process.
Bro, how did you start making nets with a 1911?
Even though graphically wise Cold War doesn’t hold up I still think it had the most solid gameplay cod had in recent memory.
The both eyes open while aiming makes sense though.
Have u tried it ??
I think the whole “both eyes open thing” for cold war is only there kus treyarch didnt bother to link head animations to actions lol
You can see portnova looking away as she fires the 1911
oddly specific but how much fun do you think it was for them to animate an underwater grenade explosion for cold war
$3
@@martholomeu9160he said fun… which is money.
And it was probably $20 because labor cost
do they have falling mags?
In Mw2 and 3 yes, when you drop a mag it actually drops in real time, though for some reason not all guns do this. I don't remember cold war having it.
Another detail, in Mw3 you can shoot a gun thats on the ground and it will move. So if you're sniping and somebody drops a gun in your scope line, you can melee it or shoot it and it will move out of the way. This was also in Mw2019, Vanguard and Mw2
Did you know in this game you can aim a laser in someones eye(more on their forehead than eye) but then they will see a lot of light from it
We live in a society where people would look at a vg character's esrs and see if the light passes through it
Correction soldiers are not trained to shoot with both eyes through a scope they leave that up to you to choose if you want to have both eyes open or not
this is an interesting comparison since both games had rushed development cicles
Do one on far cry 2. It actually has an insane amount of attention to detail especially for it being such an old game.
I’m excited for Treyarch’s next game to be on the Modern Warfare engine. As much as I love the past Treyarch games, their engines have always been a bit sluggish compared to Infinity Ward. Choppy movement, teammate arrows taking a while to go away on minimap when they die, bad hit detection, lower quality graphics(except ghosts was worse because they tried to make it work on so many platforms). Say what you want about Infinity Ward but they always nail it when it comes to performance and quality on their engine.
Can u please make all mw3 weapons in third person??
Sure
pandemic game vs a game that had all assets in front of them
Damn I remember that time, I played a beta of Cold War, there was a good time
In training soldiers are taught to use CCO which is close combat optics. Both eyes should be open because the reason for it is ease of accuracy and situational awareness. Using a SCOPE from a sniper rifle your so far away you can use one eye for the engagement however you can use both so you can peek and slew to a target if you see movement but its preference
Its a video game. It doesn't necessarily have to realistic, it just should be fun. Common problem with most of the studios, imposing realism in everything while cutting down on the fun factor
all those "improvements" and I'll still pick cold wars gameplay any day of the week
Imagine if they had TWO YEARS to work on a COD…
gulf war has had 4 years of development from what I've heard
@@tireiron33while working on cold war, vanguard zombies, mw2 features and mw3 zombies… They’re not 4 full years unfortunately.
@@BastiaXXbpe in separate teams lol, treyarch is not a small company by any means.
Anyways wont be a 100% dedication
@@BastiaXXbpe 4 times longer development time than mw2023
The original Modern Warfare series made sounds when you went through bushes…
finally after 15 years they made the most fair progress
You only keep both eyes open when using a red dot or hologram.
Was just about to say this lol
The fact both games look graphical the same means we ain’t making to another realistic cod anytime soon 😭
To you maybe I can tell the difference
You're looking in the wrong place of you're wanting a realistic shooter
_And no, MW'19 was not realistic_
@@BasedMysticPikachuliterally
COLD WAR have details which really matters and MW3 have details that no one give a fuq about or doesn't really matter in gameplay.
Bruh are sure you wanna talk about gameplay cause mw3 solos in every single way have you even tried mw3 or just watching crap videos of it.
Soviet era icicles are built different
that's crazy man.....
for cold wars sake, ik were only 37 seconds in, but technically you aren't supposed to close your eye at all when aiming down your sights.
Cold war is my favourite COD so far, MW3 i ended up getting and regretted it 😂 dont think ill get a other COD game unless i cant find another game to enjoy
All ik is in cold war the game runs properly and in every mw game like 2019 and up the game randomly freezes or i teleport or when i slide everything freezes but me then i teleport back
why couldn't there be a game that combines both upsides of these two games.
Because that takes TIME, and publishers want games on store shelves in 1/4 of that time, and Battlefield 2042 proved that putting all your dev teams together to make that happen doesn't exactly work out well.
@@robd9921Oh right cuz Embark with their game "The Finals" has both...
every cod is just the same thing with some features added and some removed. kind of like your permit test when you go to drive a car for the first time. questions taken out of a big pool.
WOW! who knew when comparing 2 games that are many years apart from each other that the older game isnt gonna be as advanced!
But the older game is more advanced
shoutout to bigmo 3:53
Bro that's cool😂
That right there was worth at least 20 gb worth of storage
Somehow cold war was made in less time than mw3, and it's still very impressive, tho hopefully xbox can make these game not be yearly releases, so we can get a great cod game
I was disappointed in the effort they took as far as realism, the ai are terrible.. youre telling me if im standing literally RIGHT behind somebody, they arent going to hear a suppressed pistol let alone rifle going off IN THEIR EAR? How come the street lights, something that adds lighting and affects stealth gameplay, cant be shot out? I cant tell you how many eye sores i had from using nvgs. All that after my game broke itself while playing the campaign, wasnt able to continue until watching several TH-cam videos on how to get it to work because the devs couldnt take the time to actually fix the mission that was bugged.
Now do MW3 compared to MW2 and it’s like we’ve gone back in time while going forward…
They can add all of this but still cant make a more enjoyable game
Why compare 3yold games to each other. Whats the point?
3:19 It’s tradition
Nothing says realistic like shooting icicles that don't break, but fall whole 😂
You have to be really desperate to jump on the bandwagon of mw3 if you're comparing it to a game that came out three years ago. Lol
i think your forgetting that cold war was made during the pandemic and everybody at treyarch working at home..
Tbh metallic sounds aren’t even that impressive unless if the dude is the most flat footed soldier in the world.
In cold war i would actually finish my games.. In MW3 i quiet 90 % games, there is something wrong with that game, enimies spawning behind you.
Oh yes, mwIII is SOOOOOO much better because they added 200 gb of details, instead of making the game
Good and balanced.
All these little things just for the games to be shit
Mw3 only had 8 months of development time
Activision just makes unreachable deadlines
@@Swift_lolsame as cold war
@@Swift_lol Wouldn't have happened if they were sticking to their original promise of 2 year service for MWII, but now they just churn out MWIII just to get the bag and let the game die
to be fair cold war is a fun arcadey classic-themed game
certainly felt like a cod game unlike this new hypercompetitive slop coming out recently
@@loafabredsledgehammer already created all these assets fpr treyarch to use in their engine
i used to utterly loathe cold war, who would've thought that in the present state i still like cold war better
it pisses me off, that they add things like breaking icicles with shots in their game before they actually fixing the game.
cold war was a masterpiece not because it was detailed but because it was fun to play they prioritized gameplay rather than stupid details people don't care about.
the movement was smooth as butter and fast paced, gameplay was the arcade-like shit that people used to love about the old games, skins actually related to the game none of this niki minaj, messi, neymar bullshit, slide canceling was in the game allowing players progression of their skills setting apart the good players from the bad ones, aim felt accurate rather than this random recoil stuff they have now. the higher ups have lost it and killed the game off and unfortunately there wont be a good call of duty again just more cashgrabs like warzone
I Remember mw 2019 was better then cold war in physics but mw3 is just worse
Huh. Wasn't expecting MW3 to take the W here. Good on Sledge for makiing do with what little time they had.
Agreed and they did way better than Treyarch's dogshit game that was CW, for 16 months they did better than what Treyarch did, from using the latest engine to reverting back to MW19's movement and gunplay unlike Treyarch when they decided to change it to a awful movement and dogshit gunplay
@@mysteryboii4869cold war is better than all sledge hammer and iw games combined dont get too happy lil bro
@@goofy5603 Cold War better than MWIII? Delusional keep coping, CW gunplay and movement were dogshit compared to MWIII.
@@mysteryboii4869 thats exactly the opposite of the truth thanks for talking bullshit
@@mysteryboii4869bro missed the 1 thing about BO CW Treyarch have to make it in time in 2020 during outbrake of Covid the time every body have to do all crap at their home and everything about that was complicated than it should be
graphics and attention to detail dont matter if the game isnt fun
The car shaking isn't a detail it's a real life occurrence. Cars shake in mw3 as a reference to real life so that when they crash the force from the wreckage can spread more evenly throughout the vehicle since mw3 is set in 2020s these cars are newer and safer compared to cold war that was set in the 80s were cars didn't have that safety feature. So it's not developers being lazy or anything it's actually realistic detailing
Cars back then had suspension…
I'm not sure you know how vehicle suspension works.
Are we talking about Modern Warfare 3 or Modern Warfare 3?
Why didn't they even try to change the name of the new one in the slightest?
There is a change. Modern Warfare 3 (old name) vs Modern Warfare III (new name) :P
Actually, you're supposed to close both eyes while aiming.
2023 and bushes staying still, kinda sad.
Main difference is mw3 is 120 fps and blurry asf, cold war is 170 fps and sharp
I haven’t really played mw3 but all I know is that it is a quick cash grab. They were gonna wait to release it but they rushed it and it is just a reskin of mw2. They fixed mw2 and called it mw3. Smh
yet CW is still 1000x better game
Treyarch actually cares about their games
Not the useless details
@@Therealjimpter
Bruh
Just accept that mw3 is better in details
@@eggnotcracked oh yeah they are but they are useless
@@Therealjimpter so rdr2 details are also useless?
Gta v?
Details make a game more immersive. So yeah details are important
But mw3 campaign is dog💩
@@eggnotcracked yeah I like useless details but not when the game is shit, you listed 2 of the greatest games ever made
so what youre telling me is sledgehammer once again wasted time on shit that doesnt matter instead of making a good game. have been a good cod since bo2 man.
Bo6 will be the one. It’s the longest dev time call of duty ever mad
Bf1 have all these detail and more (its a game from 2016)
Dude this is a vid on CoD not BF
Calm down bestie, this is CoD not BF
Interesting. What happened with 2042, can you explain real quick?
@@TheSovietFuzeit came back from the dead and is actually a good game now?
@@bakatom142It had to go F2p tho.